After watching the PBS documentary, Inside the Meltdown, tell about something you found interesting in the movie. [One thing to try to pick up from the video is the notion of moral hazard versus systemic risk. As banks started collapsing in 2008, economists debated what, if anything, the government should do. Initially, many economists invoked the notion of Moral Hazard, which says that the government should not do anything. (If the government bails out a company then it sends the wrong message to the market.) On the other hand, as banks started collapsing, many economists moved to the argument of Systemic Risk, which says that the government should bail out a bank with many ties to other banks and financial institutions. (If the bank is allowed to fail, it can create a domino effect, pulling down other banks and potentially bringing down the entire banking system.) So, think about which of the two ideas was being when it came to action or lack of action when it came to the failing of Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae, and AIG. Note that discussion do not have to have anything to do with moral hazard and systemic risk.