2. Background & Dilemma
Advertising to children has been a highly debated topic for many years
Many believe that children are impressionable by nature and therefore, it is wrong to influence
them through advertisements
The industry itself loves the fact that there is a target audience so easily persuaded
Does advertising have certain negative effects on children observing these promotions?
3. Koolaid Commercial
Could this ad be considered false advertisement?
Keeping in mind the target audience and their ability to distinguish between literal and hypothetical
meanings
4. Questions
Is it concerning how easily advertisers can target children through all of the various channels of
distribution – through multiple platforms?
Is it unethical to target an audience who can be so easily persuaded?
At what age can advertisers start targeting “children” and/or “adolescents”?
5. In My Opinion…
Children are naïve & therefore, fall victim to scams
Advertisers have a conscious responsibility to be mindful of their deceit
Not necessarily completely unethical
Depending on intent and how the promotional activity is approached
By targeting a market that is so naïve, children so easily fall prey to scams. Some may argue that it is their parent’s responsibility to monitor what they see and don’t see. I personally think advertisers have a social responsibility to be conscious of how deceptive their message may come across. With that being said, I’m not sure I can say that advertisers who seek a market opportunity are completely unethical. A lot of it stems from intent and the way in which the promotional activity is approached.