CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
Adaptive US
Inc.
December
2021.
CONFLICTS ARE PART OF
LIFE AND ARE INEVITABLE.
WE SHOULD NOT AVOID
THEM. SOMETIMES EVEN
CONFLICTS CAN BE HELPFUL
TO IDENTIFY SCENARIOS
THAT WE DID NOT
ANTICIPATE IN THE
BEGINNING. AS BUSINESS
ANALYSTS, WE SHOULD
HAVE SOME TECHNIQUES IN
OUR ARMOR WHICH WOULD
HELP US TO RESOLVE
CONFLICTS.
Why
Manage
Conflict
s?
CONFLICT
MANAGEME
NT
What is Conflict?
Conflict Styles
Techniques for Managing
Conflicts
WHAT IS CONFLICT?
Conflict is a
struggle
between
stakeholders
who perceive
they have
incompatible
goals.
CONFLICTS
Negative
Wasted resources and energy
spent dealing with the conflict
Decreased productivity
Lowered motivation
Decreased morale
Poor decision-making
Trust Issues
Toxic culture
Positive
Better information
Better choices
Reduces anxiety
Encourages collaboration
Increases understanding
Speeds decision making
CONFLICT
MANAGEMEN
T
The tools, process and
procedure for managing
conflict
EMOTIONS
ARE VITAL
DURING
CONFLICT
MANAGEME
NT
 Emotions play strong role
during conflicts.
 Negative emotions cause
intense and even irrational
behavior leading to a break
down.
 Appoint a facilitator to keep
tab on emotions
 If emotions run high, allow a
cool-off period
CONFLICT
STYLES
Kilmann
Thomas
CONFLICT STYLES
Competing
Accommodating
Avoiding
Compromising
Collaborating
CONFLICT STYLES GOALS
Competing: Goal is to win.
Accommodating: Goal is to yield.
Avoiding: Goal is to delay.
Compromising: Goal is to find a middle
ground.
Collaborating: Goal is to ensure parity
of goals.
CONFLICT STYLES-
COMPETING
 Quick, decisive action is vital-e.g.,
emergencies
 Unpopular courses of action need
implementing-e.g., cost cutting, enforcing
unpopular rules, discipline
 When you know you're right
 To protect against people who take advantage
of noncompetitive behavior.
CONFLICT STYLES –
ACCOMMODATING
 The issue is much more important to the other
person than to you, As a goodwill gesture to
help maintain a relationship;
 To build up social credits for later issues which
are important to you;
 Continued competition would only damage
your cause-when you are outmatched and
losing.
 Preserving harmony and avoiding disruption
are especially important. This is courting
behavior.
 You realize that you are wrong. To allow a
better position to be heard, to learn from
others, and to show that you are reasonable.
CONFLICT STYLES –
AVOIDING
 An issue is trivial, or when other more
important issues are pressing.
 You perceive no chance of satisfying your
concerns-e.g., when you have low power, or
you are frustrated by something which would
be very difficult to change
 The potential damage of confronting a conflict
outweighs the benefits of its resolution.
 Gathering more information outweighs the
advantages of an immediate decision.
 To let people cool-down. To reduce tensions
to a productive level and to regain perspective
and composure.
CONFLICT STYLES –
COMPROMISING
 Goals are moderately important, but not worth
the effort or potential disruption of more
assertive modes.
 Each side has equal power, and both are
strongly committed to mutually exclusive
goals-are in labor-management bargaining.
 To achieve temporary settlements to complex
issues.
 To arrive an expedient solution under time
pressure.
 As a backup mode when collaboration or
competition fails to be successful.
CONFLICT STYLES –
COLLABORATING
 To find an integrative solution.
 Your objective is to learn-e.g., test your own
assumptions, understand the views of others.
 To merge insights from people with different
perspectives on a problem.
 To gain commitment by incorporating other's
concerns into a consensual decision.
 To work through hard feelings which have
been interfering with an interpersonal
relationship.
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT TIPS
CONNECT CLARIFY CONFIRM CONTRACT
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT TIPS
Listen Actively
Have Empathy
Watch Body Language
Have patience
Think from other stakeholder’s point of view
CONFLICT
RESOLUTION
TECHNIQUES
RATIONALE INVESTIGATION
Often stakeholders state something as their
need.
The real need can be quite different from the
stated need.
Investigate the rationale behind the conflict.
Use this information to resolve the conflict.
DISCUSSION
Make all conflicting parties discuss and negotiate a
solution to the conflict.
Encourage conflicting parties to exchange information,
arguments, and opinions.
Try to convince one another of each other’s viewpoints
in order to reach an agreeable solution.
COMPROMISE
Encourage conflicting parties to find a compromise
between alternative solutions.
In contrast to an agreement, a compromise consists of
an amalgamation of different parts of alternative
solutions.
Also, a compromise can mean that all alternative
solutions as proposed so far are discarded and entirely
new solutions are creatively developed.
VOTING
Conduct voting among all conflict parties on solution
alternatives.
Present alternatives up for voting to all relevant
stakeholders.
Each stakeholder casts her vote for an alternative and
the alternative with the most votes is accepted as the
resolution for the conflict.
DEFINITION OF VARIANTS
Find a way to develop the system in a way that permits
variants/alternatives.
This way, the system can satisfy the different interests
of stakeholders.
This is indeed a great method that can be considered
a win-win.
EXPERT OPINION / MEDIATION
Allow an external expert to choose the right option.
Ensure the expert is unbiased with respect to the
decision.
DECISION MATRIX
Create a table that contains solution alternatives in
columns and all relevant decision criteria in rows.
Provide weight to evaluation criteria. Multiply weight
with alternative performance rating.
Calculate sums of columns in order to find a solution.
Accept solution alternative with the highest score.
OVERRULING
If all other methods fail, request the sponsor to
decide.
This technique is only advisable if other resolution
techniques have failed or are not applicable due to
limitations of resources (e.g., time).
RESOURCE
S
National Institute of
Advanced Conflict
Resolution
http://www.niacr.org/
Art of Facilitation, by Dale
Hunter
Thomas/Kilmann Conflict
Style Instrument
http://www.kilmanndiagnosti
cs.com/catalog/thomas-
kilmann-conflict-mode-
instrument
THANK YOU!

Adaptive US Conflict Management

  • 1.
  • 2.
    CONFLICTS ARE PARTOF LIFE AND ARE INEVITABLE. WE SHOULD NOT AVOID THEM. SOMETIMES EVEN CONFLICTS CAN BE HELPFUL TO IDENTIFY SCENARIOS THAT WE DID NOT ANTICIPATE IN THE BEGINNING. AS BUSINESS ANALYSTS, WE SHOULD HAVE SOME TECHNIQUES IN OUR ARMOR WHICH WOULD HELP US TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS. Why Manage Conflict s?
  • 3.
    CONFLICT MANAGEME NT What is Conflict? ConflictStyles Techniques for Managing Conflicts
  • 4.
    WHAT IS CONFLICT? Conflictis a struggle between stakeholders who perceive they have incompatible goals.
  • 5.
    CONFLICTS Negative Wasted resources andenergy spent dealing with the conflict Decreased productivity Lowered motivation Decreased morale Poor decision-making Trust Issues Toxic culture Positive Better information Better choices Reduces anxiety Encourages collaboration Increases understanding Speeds decision making
  • 6.
    CONFLICT MANAGEMEN T The tools, processand procedure for managing conflict
  • 7.
    EMOTIONS ARE VITAL DURING CONFLICT MANAGEME NT  Emotionsplay strong role during conflicts.  Negative emotions cause intense and even irrational behavior leading to a break down.  Appoint a facilitator to keep tab on emotions  If emotions run high, allow a cool-off period
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    CONFLICT STYLES GOALS Competing:Goal is to win. Accommodating: Goal is to yield. Avoiding: Goal is to delay. Compromising: Goal is to find a middle ground. Collaborating: Goal is to ensure parity of goals.
  • 11.
    CONFLICT STYLES- COMPETING  Quick,decisive action is vital-e.g., emergencies  Unpopular courses of action need implementing-e.g., cost cutting, enforcing unpopular rules, discipline  When you know you're right  To protect against people who take advantage of noncompetitive behavior.
  • 12.
    CONFLICT STYLES – ACCOMMODATING The issue is much more important to the other person than to you, As a goodwill gesture to help maintain a relationship;  To build up social credits for later issues which are important to you;  Continued competition would only damage your cause-when you are outmatched and losing.  Preserving harmony and avoiding disruption are especially important. This is courting behavior.  You realize that you are wrong. To allow a better position to be heard, to learn from others, and to show that you are reasonable.
  • 13.
    CONFLICT STYLES – AVOIDING An issue is trivial, or when other more important issues are pressing.  You perceive no chance of satisfying your concerns-e.g., when you have low power, or you are frustrated by something which would be very difficult to change  The potential damage of confronting a conflict outweighs the benefits of its resolution.  Gathering more information outweighs the advantages of an immediate decision.  To let people cool-down. To reduce tensions to a productive level and to regain perspective and composure.
  • 14.
    CONFLICT STYLES – COMPROMISING Goals are moderately important, but not worth the effort or potential disruption of more assertive modes.  Each side has equal power, and both are strongly committed to mutually exclusive goals-are in labor-management bargaining.  To achieve temporary settlements to complex issues.  To arrive an expedient solution under time pressure.  As a backup mode when collaboration or competition fails to be successful.
  • 15.
    CONFLICT STYLES – COLLABORATING To find an integrative solution.  Your objective is to learn-e.g., test your own assumptions, understand the views of others.  To merge insights from people with different perspectives on a problem.  To gain commitment by incorporating other's concerns into a consensual decision.  To work through hard feelings which have been interfering with an interpersonal relationship.
  • 16.
    CONFLICT MANAGEMENT TIPS CONNECTCLARIFY CONFIRM CONTRACT
  • 17.
    CONFLICT MANAGEMENT TIPS ListenActively Have Empathy Watch Body Language Have patience Think from other stakeholder’s point of view
  • 18.
  • 19.
    RATIONALE INVESTIGATION Often stakeholdersstate something as their need. The real need can be quite different from the stated need. Investigate the rationale behind the conflict. Use this information to resolve the conflict.
  • 20.
    DISCUSSION Make all conflictingparties discuss and negotiate a solution to the conflict. Encourage conflicting parties to exchange information, arguments, and opinions. Try to convince one another of each other’s viewpoints in order to reach an agreeable solution.
  • 21.
    COMPROMISE Encourage conflicting partiesto find a compromise between alternative solutions. In contrast to an agreement, a compromise consists of an amalgamation of different parts of alternative solutions. Also, a compromise can mean that all alternative solutions as proposed so far are discarded and entirely new solutions are creatively developed.
  • 22.
    VOTING Conduct voting amongall conflict parties on solution alternatives. Present alternatives up for voting to all relevant stakeholders. Each stakeholder casts her vote for an alternative and the alternative with the most votes is accepted as the resolution for the conflict.
  • 23.
    DEFINITION OF VARIANTS Finda way to develop the system in a way that permits variants/alternatives. This way, the system can satisfy the different interests of stakeholders. This is indeed a great method that can be considered a win-win.
  • 24.
    EXPERT OPINION /MEDIATION Allow an external expert to choose the right option. Ensure the expert is unbiased with respect to the decision.
  • 25.
    DECISION MATRIX Create atable that contains solution alternatives in columns and all relevant decision criteria in rows. Provide weight to evaluation criteria. Multiply weight with alternative performance rating. Calculate sums of columns in order to find a solution. Accept solution alternative with the highest score.
  • 26.
    OVERRULING If all othermethods fail, request the sponsor to decide. This technique is only advisable if other resolution techniques have failed or are not applicable due to limitations of resources (e.g., time).
  • 27.
    RESOURCE S National Institute of AdvancedConflict Resolution http://www.niacr.org/ Art of Facilitation, by Dale Hunter Thomas/Kilmann Conflict Style Instrument http://www.kilmanndiagnosti cs.com/catalog/thomas- kilmann-conflict-mode- instrument
  • 28.

Editor's Notes

  • #10 Competing - need to satisfy own needs high, need to satisfy other's needs low; Accommodating - need to satisfy own needs low, need to satisfy other's needs high; Avoiding - need to satisfy own needs low, need to satisfy other's needs low; Compromising - need to satisfy own needs about 50%, need to satisfy other's needs about 50%. This is the split the difference approach. Collaborating - need to satisfy own needs high, need to satisfy other's needs high.
  • #11 Competing - need to satisfy own needs high, need to satisfy other's needs low; Accommodating - need to satisfy own needs low, need to satisfy other's needs high; Avoiding - need to satisfy own needs low, need to satisfy other's needs low; Compromising - need to satisfy own needs about 50%, need to satisfy other's needs about 50%. This is the split the difference approach. Collaborating - need to satisfy own needs high, need to satisfy other's needs high.