SlideShare a Scribd company logo
7th Responsive Space®
Conference
1
A Concept of Operations for Sea-launched TacSats for
Responsive Space (STaRS)1
LtCol Robert Carneal
Mr. RayMing Chang
U.S. Air Force
robert.carneal@losangeles.af.mil
rayming.chang@losangeles.af.mil
ABSTRACT
The Responsive Space community has focused on Responsive Launch as an area of
improvement that would help achieve space become more responsive. Unfortunately,
developing a Responsive Launch capability is fraught with difficulties. American launch
facilities (i.e., Eastern Range, Western Range, Kwajalein, etc.) have numerous logistical
and physical limitations that restrict U.S ability to quickly launch a satellite, including:
restricted launch fans, prior easements, launch plumes, and safety concerns.
This paper proposes a possible solution that avoids many of the difficulties associated
with launch systems used today: a Sea-launched TacSats for Responsive Space (STaRS)
system.
A Sea-based TacSat launch capability would solve many of the problems associated with
limited launch pads at fixed sites, including issues with “possible” launch pad availability
due to competing program priorities as opposed to having a definite launch date. Of
course, STaRS systems will need to deal with issues that land-based systems do not, such
as ocean environments, transportation logistics, and security concerns.
Sea-launched vehicles are a proven technology. The prime example of highly effective
sea-based launch system is United Launch Alliance’s Sea-Launch. Another example is
the ICBM architecture which already exists with Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles
(SLBMs) aboard ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Russia has been launching
satellites from submarines since at least 1994. For example, in 2006, the Russian
Federation successfully launched an 80 kg Compass-2 satellite from a K-84
"Ekaterinburg” submarine.
The least expensive option for a sea-borne STaRS platform would be to convert a used
tanker or cargo ship. Command of a STaRS ship would likely be split between the Navy
and the Air Force. Cost savings could be realized by utilizing a primarily civilian crew
1
The views presented are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Department of
Defense or its Components
7th Responsive Space®
Conference
2
on the STaRS ship with joint Navy and Air Force command, similar to how the Military
Sealift Command's Prepositioning Program is crewed. A more expensive option would
be to convert and dedicate a SSBN submarine for STaRS missions. STaRS ships/subs
could be pre-positioned near the equator or incorporated into a Navy fleet.
A STaRS platform will likely be able to carry at least several launch vehicles on standby,
if not several dozen. A STaRS platform will therefore likely have the capacity to quickly
launch a constellation of TacSats which would provide more flexibility and
responsiveness. In addition, STaRS could launch a Payload Assist Module (PAM) in
order to insert a payload beyond LEO.
A STaRS system has the potential to avoid many of the problems associated with land-
based launch and provide a real responsive launch capability.

More Related Content

Similar to Abstract for STaRS

LauncherOne revolutionary orbital transport for small satellites
LauncherOne  revolutionary orbital transport for small satellitesLauncherOne  revolutionary orbital transport for small satellites
LauncherOne revolutionary orbital transport for small satellites
Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Unmanned Marine Vehicles - SAR
Unmanned Marine Vehicles - SARUnmanned Marine Vehicles - SAR
Unmanned Marine Vehicles - SAR
VR Marine Technologies
 
The Ares Projects: Back to the Future
The Ares Projects: Back to the FutureThe Ares Projects: Back to the Future
The Ares Projects: Back to the Future
American Astronautical Society
 
Wind Farm Access Vessel
Wind Farm Access VesselWind Farm Access Vessel
Wind Farm Access VesselBoyang Wang
 
B 08 Mpf(F) Ship Studies
B 08 Mpf(F) Ship StudiesB 08 Mpf(F) Ship Studies
B 08 Mpf(F) Ship Studies
guest9455a7
 
Nano satellite by anil
Nano satellite by anilNano satellite by anil
Nano satellite by anil
Anil Yadav
 
Long_Alexandra-8900_final
Long_Alexandra-8900_finalLong_Alexandra-8900_final
Long_Alexandra-8900_finalAlexandra Long
 
Von Braun Symposium 2008: SpaceX
Von Braun Symposium 2008: SpaceXVon Braun Symposium 2008: SpaceX
Von Braun Symposium 2008: SpaceX
American Astronautical Society
 
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics compressed - color
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics   compressed - colorAuv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics   compressed - color
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics compressed - color
Cory Treffiletti
 
Environmentally Adaptive Deployment of Lagrangian Instrumentation Using a Sub...
Environmentally Adaptive Deployment of Lagrangian Instrumentation Using a Sub...Environmentally Adaptive Deployment of Lagrangian Instrumentation Using a Sub...
Environmentally Adaptive Deployment of Lagrangian Instrumentation Using a Sub...
David Fratantoni
 
Space Launch System Secondary Payloads
Space Launch System Secondary PayloadsSpace Launch System Secondary Payloads
Space Launch System Secondary Payloads
Dr. Pankaj Dhussa
 
Space Station
Space StationSpace Station
Space StationBong Tong
 
A Comparative Analysis for Predicting Ship Squat in Shallow Water
A Comparative Analysis for Predicting Ship Squat in Shallow WaterA Comparative Analysis for Predicting Ship Squat in Shallow Water
A Comparative Analysis for Predicting Ship Squat in Shallow Water
IRJET Journal
 
SeaBasing 21 v3.0
SeaBasing 21 v3.0SeaBasing 21 v3.0
SeaBasing 21 v3.0
1st_TSG_Airborne
 
Challenger final release
Challenger final releaseChallenger final release
Challenger final releasemickmonte
 
Spaceplanes
SpaceplanesSpaceplanes
Spaceplanes
Abdul Saleem A
 
Power Dynamics Innovations LLC Latest Design Build Contract
Power Dynamics Innovations LLC Latest Design Build ContractPower Dynamics Innovations LLC Latest Design Build Contract
Power Dynamics Innovations LLC Latest Design Build Contract
Carl Liberty
 

Similar to Abstract for STaRS (20)

LauncherOne revolutionary orbital transport for small satellites
LauncherOne  revolutionary orbital transport for small satellitesLauncherOne  revolutionary orbital transport for small satellites
LauncherOne revolutionary orbital transport for small satellites
 
Unmanned Marine Vehicles - SAR
Unmanned Marine Vehicles - SARUnmanned Marine Vehicles - SAR
Unmanned Marine Vehicles - SAR
 
The Ares Projects: Back to the Future
The Ares Projects: Back to the FutureThe Ares Projects: Back to the Future
The Ares Projects: Back to the Future
 
Wind Farm Access Vessel
Wind Farm Access VesselWind Farm Access Vessel
Wind Farm Access Vessel
 
FINAL PAPER
FINAL PAPERFINAL PAPER
FINAL PAPER
 
B 08 Mpf(F) Ship Studies
B 08 Mpf(F) Ship StudiesB 08 Mpf(F) Ship Studies
B 08 Mpf(F) Ship Studies
 
Nano satellite by anil
Nano satellite by anilNano satellite by anil
Nano satellite by anil
 
Long_Alexandra-8900_final
Long_Alexandra-8900_finalLong_Alexandra-8900_final
Long_Alexandra-8900_final
 
Von Braun Symposium 2008: SpaceX
Von Braun Symposium 2008: SpaceXVon Braun Symposium 2008: SpaceX
Von Braun Symposium 2008: SpaceX
 
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics compressed - color
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics   compressed - colorAuv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics   compressed - color
Auv launch and recovery from us navy ships wpics compressed - color
 
Environmentally Adaptive Deployment of Lagrangian Instrumentation Using a Sub...
Environmentally Adaptive Deployment of Lagrangian Instrumentation Using a Sub...Environmentally Adaptive Deployment of Lagrangian Instrumentation Using a Sub...
Environmentally Adaptive Deployment of Lagrangian Instrumentation Using a Sub...
 
Space Launch System Secondary Payloads
Space Launch System Secondary PayloadsSpace Launch System Secondary Payloads
Space Launch System Secondary Payloads
 
Space Station
Space StationSpace Station
Space Station
 
A Comparative Analysis for Predicting Ship Squat in Shallow Water
A Comparative Analysis for Predicting Ship Squat in Shallow WaterA Comparative Analysis for Predicting Ship Squat in Shallow Water
A Comparative Analysis for Predicting Ship Squat in Shallow Water
 
SeaBasing 21 v3.0
SeaBasing 21 v3.0SeaBasing 21 v3.0
SeaBasing 21 v3.0
 
Challenger final release
Challenger final releaseChallenger final release
Challenger final release
 
Lpd 25
Lpd 25Lpd 25
Lpd 25
 
Lpd 25
Lpd 25Lpd 25
Lpd 25
 
Spaceplanes
SpaceplanesSpaceplanes
Spaceplanes
 
Power Dynamics Innovations LLC Latest Design Build Contract
Power Dynamics Innovations LLC Latest Design Build ContractPower Dynamics Innovations LLC Latest Design Build Contract
Power Dynamics Innovations LLC Latest Design Build Contract
 

Abstract for STaRS

  • 1. 7th Responsive Space® Conference 1 A Concept of Operations for Sea-launched TacSats for Responsive Space (STaRS)1 LtCol Robert Carneal Mr. RayMing Chang U.S. Air Force robert.carneal@losangeles.af.mil rayming.chang@losangeles.af.mil ABSTRACT The Responsive Space community has focused on Responsive Launch as an area of improvement that would help achieve space become more responsive. Unfortunately, developing a Responsive Launch capability is fraught with difficulties. American launch facilities (i.e., Eastern Range, Western Range, Kwajalein, etc.) have numerous logistical and physical limitations that restrict U.S ability to quickly launch a satellite, including: restricted launch fans, prior easements, launch plumes, and safety concerns. This paper proposes a possible solution that avoids many of the difficulties associated with launch systems used today: a Sea-launched TacSats for Responsive Space (STaRS) system. A Sea-based TacSat launch capability would solve many of the problems associated with limited launch pads at fixed sites, including issues with “possible” launch pad availability due to competing program priorities as opposed to having a definite launch date. Of course, STaRS systems will need to deal with issues that land-based systems do not, such as ocean environments, transportation logistics, and security concerns. Sea-launched vehicles are a proven technology. The prime example of highly effective sea-based launch system is United Launch Alliance’s Sea-Launch. Another example is the ICBM architecture which already exists with Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBMs) aboard ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Russia has been launching satellites from submarines since at least 1994. For example, in 2006, the Russian Federation successfully launched an 80 kg Compass-2 satellite from a K-84 "Ekaterinburg” submarine. The least expensive option for a sea-borne STaRS platform would be to convert a used tanker or cargo ship. Command of a STaRS ship would likely be split between the Navy and the Air Force. Cost savings could be realized by utilizing a primarily civilian crew 1 The views presented are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Department of Defense or its Components
  • 2. 7th Responsive Space® Conference 2 on the STaRS ship with joint Navy and Air Force command, similar to how the Military Sealift Command's Prepositioning Program is crewed. A more expensive option would be to convert and dedicate a SSBN submarine for STaRS missions. STaRS ships/subs could be pre-positioned near the equator or incorporated into a Navy fleet. A STaRS platform will likely be able to carry at least several launch vehicles on standby, if not several dozen. A STaRS platform will therefore likely have the capacity to quickly launch a constellation of TacSats which would provide more flexibility and responsiveness. In addition, STaRS could launch a Payload Assist Module (PAM) in order to insert a payload beyond LEO. A STaRS system has the potential to avoid many of the problems associated with land- based launch and provide a real responsive launch capability.