Justice Dato' Mohd Hishamudin Mohd Yunus had an illustrious 23-year career as a judge, most notably on the Court of Appeal, where he was known for his integrity, independence, and commitment to upholding the constitution and protecting human rights. He authored several landmark judgments promoting fairness, equality, civil liberties, and limiting overreach of executive power. However, some of his bolder rulings were later overturned. He will be remembered for his principled stances and creative, equitable interpretations of the law.
Dato’ Seri Ir Hj Nizar bin Jamaluddin v Dato’ Seri Dr Zambry bin Abdul Kadir
(Attorney General, Interverner) [2010] 2 MLJ 285 - as fulfill the assessment of LAW 487 - Constitutional Law II at Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
Article 7 prohibition of retrospective criminal lawHafizul Mukhlis
Article 7 of the document prohibits retrospective criminal laws in two parts. First, it prohibits punishing people for acts that were legal at the time. Second, it prohibits imposing greater punishment than what was prescribed by law at the time of the offense. The document discusses that retrospective changes to substantive criminal law and punishment are not allowed, while retrospective procedural changes are permitted. It analyzes a past court case, Loh Kooi Choon, where a constitutional amendment was found to improperly deprive someone of legal protections retroactively.
This document summarizes the rights of an arrested person under Article 5(3) and (4) of the Malaysian constitution. It discusses the three main rights: 1) the right to be informed of the grounds for arrest, 2) the right to consult a legal practitioner, and 3) the right to be defended by a legal practitioner of one's choice. It examines Malaysian case law that has interpreted and established limitations on these rights, such as allowing a reasonable delay before access to a lawyer to avoid interfering with police investigations. The document also discusses exceptions to these rights for enemy aliens under certain security laws.
The document discusses the rights of arrested persons under Article 5 of the Malaysian Constitution.
It describes the 3 rights under Article 5(3): 1) the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest, 2) the right to consult a lawyer, and 3) the right to be defended by a lawyer of one's choice. It also discusses the right under Article 5(4) to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours.
Several court cases are discussed that relate to defining and enforcing these rights. For example, in Abdul Rahman v Tan Jo Koh the court held that a person must be given a reason for their arrest within a reasonable time. In Ramli bin Salleh the right to counsel was
This document summarizes key aspects of religious freedom and property rights under the Malaysian Constitution. It outlines the rights to profess, practice and propagate religion (A11), as well as limits on these rights, including restrictions on attempting to convert Muslims. It discusses cases related to religious instruction in schools, wearing religious attire, and preventing religious propagation. The document also defines property under A13, notes it includes tangible and intangible forms, and outlines legal requirements and protections regarding deprivation of property, including the right to compensation.
CONTOH MOOTING OLEH PELAJAR TAHUN AKHIR DI UUMASMAH CHE WAN
Appeal on criminal case which is a rape case. we are acting on behalf of appellant (accused). This case was based on real situation in the case of Azahan bin Aminallah v PP.
This document summarizes a discussion on constitutional law and human rights in Malaysia. It discusses how certain fundamental rights like the right to be informed of arrest grounds and the right to be produced before a magistrate have sometimes been denied to detainees due to legal provisions that override these rights or imperfect law implementation. It then explains the powers granted under Article 149 of the Malaysian constitution to pass laws that can limit fundamental rights in order to combat threats like subversion, even without a state of emergency. Key cases related to judicial review of such laws and the Internal Security Act are analyzed.
Dato’ Seri Ir Hj Nizar bin Jamaluddin v Dato’ Seri Dr Zambry bin Abdul Kadir
(Attorney General, Interverner) [2010] 2 MLJ 285 - as fulfill the assessment of LAW 487 - Constitutional Law II at Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
Article 7 prohibition of retrospective criminal lawHafizul Mukhlis
Article 7 of the document prohibits retrospective criminal laws in two parts. First, it prohibits punishing people for acts that were legal at the time. Second, it prohibits imposing greater punishment than what was prescribed by law at the time of the offense. The document discusses that retrospective changes to substantive criminal law and punishment are not allowed, while retrospective procedural changes are permitted. It analyzes a past court case, Loh Kooi Choon, where a constitutional amendment was found to improperly deprive someone of legal protections retroactively.
This document summarizes the rights of an arrested person under Article 5(3) and (4) of the Malaysian constitution. It discusses the three main rights: 1) the right to be informed of the grounds for arrest, 2) the right to consult a legal practitioner, and 3) the right to be defended by a legal practitioner of one's choice. It examines Malaysian case law that has interpreted and established limitations on these rights, such as allowing a reasonable delay before access to a lawyer to avoid interfering with police investigations. The document also discusses exceptions to these rights for enemy aliens under certain security laws.
The document discusses the rights of arrested persons under Article 5 of the Malaysian Constitution.
It describes the 3 rights under Article 5(3): 1) the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest, 2) the right to consult a lawyer, and 3) the right to be defended by a lawyer of one's choice. It also discusses the right under Article 5(4) to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours.
Several court cases are discussed that relate to defining and enforcing these rights. For example, in Abdul Rahman v Tan Jo Koh the court held that a person must be given a reason for their arrest within a reasonable time. In Ramli bin Salleh the right to counsel was
This document summarizes key aspects of religious freedom and property rights under the Malaysian Constitution. It outlines the rights to profess, practice and propagate religion (A11), as well as limits on these rights, including restrictions on attempting to convert Muslims. It discusses cases related to religious instruction in schools, wearing religious attire, and preventing religious propagation. The document also defines property under A13, notes it includes tangible and intangible forms, and outlines legal requirements and protections regarding deprivation of property, including the right to compensation.
CONTOH MOOTING OLEH PELAJAR TAHUN AKHIR DI UUMASMAH CHE WAN
Appeal on criminal case which is a rape case. we are acting on behalf of appellant (accused). This case was based on real situation in the case of Azahan bin Aminallah v PP.
This document summarizes a discussion on constitutional law and human rights in Malaysia. It discusses how certain fundamental rights like the right to be informed of arrest grounds and the right to be produced before a magistrate have sometimes been denied to detainees due to legal provisions that override these rights or imperfect law implementation. It then explains the powers granted under Article 149 of the Malaysian constitution to pass laws that can limit fundamental rights in order to combat threats like subversion, even without a state of emergency. Key cases related to judicial review of such laws and the Internal Security Act are analyzed.
The document discusses habeas corpus under Article 5(2) of the Malaysian constitution. It provides that habeas corpus guarantees the right to challenge unlawful detention in court. The court can order the production of a detained person and quash an illegal arrest or detention. However, habeas corpus does not apply in certain situations, such as when serving a lawful court sentence, lawful arrests for 24 hours, or remand under a magistrate's order. It also does not apply to challenges of trial legality, bail conditions, restriction orders, or detention for deportation under immigration law. The remedy in those cases is appeal through criminal procedure codes instead of habeas corpus.
The document discusses Article 5 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, which protects individuals from being deprived of life or personal liberty except in accordance with law. It summarizes the rights this article provides, including the right to know the grounds of arrest, the right to legal representation, and the right to be produced before a magistrate. It also discusses exceptions to these rights under emergency laws and the remedy of habeas corpus.
The appellant, a defense lawyer for Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, filed a motion to disqualify two prosecutors based on supporting documents. The High Court judge held the motion was baseless and proposed holding the appellant in contempt of court. In a summary hearing, the appellant was found guilty and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment. The Federal Court allowed the appeal, finding that: (1) the appellant was justified in filing the motion, so there was no abuse of court process; (2) the contempt charge was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) the appellant should have been granted an adjournment to fully prepare his defense, as denying this deprived him of a fair hearing.
Review of syariah court decisions by the high courtNoor Atikah
The document summarizes two court cases regarding the jurisdiction of civil and syariah courts in Malaysia to determine matters relating to a person's religion.
In the first case, the High Court held that under the Federal Constitution, civil courts cannot interfere with or set aside orders from Syariah courts, as their jurisdictions are separate.
The second case involved competing claims over the body of a deceased man from his Hindu wife and the Majlis Agama Islam. The Syariah Court had ordered the body be buried according to Islamic rites, but the High Court dismissed the wife's attempt to nullify his conversion to Islam, holding that it had no jurisdiction to review Syariah Court decisions or determine matters of Islamic
Rosmimah has been married to Sallehuddin for 20 years and they have 3 children together. Sallehuddin took a job in Dubai and the whole family moved there. After a year, he married Jenny in Dubai without divorcing Rosmimah. Rosmimah and the children then returned to Malaysia with Sallehuddin's consent. Sallehuddin did not provide maintenance. The document discusses whether Rosmimah and the children are entitled to maintenance given the circumstances. It also discusses the rights of inheritance for both Rosmimah and Jenny in the event of Sallehuddin's death considering the properties acquired during his marriages.
Article 5 Federal Constitution Malaysia - Liberty of a pesonNelfi Amiera Mizan
Article 5 of the Malaysian Federal Constitution provides rights to liberty of the person but contains some defects. It outlines exceptions where a person may be deprived of liberty but these exceptions have been interpreted too narrowly by courts. Compared to international standards like the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 5 does not sufficiently protect personal liberty and is easily overridden by security laws. Reforms are needed to strengthen Article 5's protections, such as amending absolute emergency powers and defining 'law' to incorporate principles of natural justice.
UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY IN MALAYSIA BEFORE AND AFTER 2012ASMAH CHE WAN
1) The document discusses Malaysian laws regarding unlawful and peaceful assemblies, including definitions, objectives, and analysis of relevant acts such as the Federal Constitution, Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, Police Act 1967, and Peaceful Assembly Act 2012.
2) It provides an overview of key provisions within these acts pertaining to unlawful assemblies, permits for assemblies, police powers, and criticisms of the Peaceful Assembly Act.
3) A comparison is made between Malaysian laws on freedom of assembly and those of the United States and Canada, noting differences in requirements for permits, restrictions on speech, and police responsibilities during assemblies.
This document discusses the legal rights of arrested persons in Malaysia, including the right to legal representation and habeas corpus. Some key points:
(1) Section 28A of the Criminal Procedure Code provides rights for arrested persons such as informing them of the grounds for arrest and allowing communication with a lawyer.
(2) Habeas corpus applications can challenge unlawful detentions and procedural improprieties in arrests and detentions. Courts have enforced compliance with mandatory legal requirements.
(3) The right to legal representation begins from the time of arrest, but may be reasonably restricted to facilitate police investigations. Overall the document analyzes various cases related to habeas corpus and legal rights after arrest.
The document summarizes the history and current state of the legal profession in Malaysia. It discusses:
- The legal profession in Malaysia is a fused profession with no distinction between solicitors and barristers.
- The earliest lawyers were known as "law agents" or "advocates and attornies", with the first admission recorded in 1808.
- Various ordinances established regulatory bodies for lawyers in different states, which were consolidated by the Legal Profession Act 1976, establishing the Malaysian Bar and Bar Council. However, Sabah and Sarawak continue to have their own separate legislation and professional bodies.
Article 13 of the Malaysian Constitution establishes the right to property and places limitations on when property can be deprived. Article 13(1) states that no one can be deprived of property without a law authorizing such deprivation. However, the term "law" incorporates the concept of "jus" or legitimate law, providing some safeguards against arbitrary or unreasonable laws. Article 13(2) allows for acquisition of property for public purposes or purposes beneficial to the economic development of Malaysia, as long as adequate compensation is provided. The courts can determine what constitutes adequate compensation under the Constitution.
The document summarizes key points about maintenance of a spouse under Malaysian family law:
1) Section 77 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act provides the court the power to order maintenance for a spouse in three situations: during matrimonial proceedings, when granting or after granting a divorce or judicial separation decree, or if a spouse is found alive after being presumed dead.
2) The court determines maintenance amounts based primarily on the means and needs of the parties, regardless of income proportions, but considers the responsibility of each party for the marriage breakdown.
3) The right to receive court-ordered maintenance ends if the recipient remarries or lives in adultery with another person.
(1) A Temporary Occupation License (TOL) allows temporary occupation of state land, mining land, or reserved land for a specified purpose.
(2) A TOL is issued by the Land Administrator with approval from relevant authorities and is valid only until the end of the calendar year. It can be renewed up to three times with approval from the State Authority.
(3) A TOL holder has rights of possession of the land but cannot transfer or assign the license. The license terminates upon the death of the holder or dissolution of a company holder.
This document discusses whether breach of promise to marry should remain a cause of action in Malaysian courts. It begins by explaining that in England, the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 abolished this cause of action, but notes that Malaysian law is not bound by English legislation due to cut-off dates under Section 3 of the Civil Law Act. The document then provides arguments for why breach of promise to marry remains a valid cause of action in Malaysia, such as to uphold the integrity of promises made and award exemplary damages for distress caused by breaches. Case examples are discussed throughout to support keeping this as a cause of action.
Criminal Law II - General Defences (Part 2)intnmsrh
The document summarizes general defences in criminal law, including consent, duress, and private defence.
Consent is not a defence if given under fear, misconception, unsoundness of mind, or by a minor. Duress is a defence for threats of instant death that reasonably cause apprehension, but not if the accused voluntarily exposed themselves to threats.
Private defence must be used to avert an impending danger, commences with reasonable apprehension of harm, and ends when the apprehension stops. More harm than necessary cannot be inflicted, and recourse to authorities must be attempted if possible.
Land Law II notes - For Revision Purposes OnlyAzrin Hafiz
This document summarizes 11 land law cases related to jual janji (conditional sale) transactions and lien cases in Malaysia. It provides brief summaries of the facts and outcomes of each case. The cases cover topics such as whether a transaction constituted a jual janji or outright sale, the right to redeem land after the agreed repayment period has expired, and priority of claims when charges or liens on land are involved.
The document summarizes the different methods of amending the Malaysian Constitution as outlined in Articles 159 and 161E. It discusses four methods: amendments requiring a simple majority in Parliament; a two-thirds majority in Parliament and consent of the Conference of Rulers; a two-thirds majority in Parliament and consent of the Governors of Sabah and Sarawak; and a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament. It also examines debates around amendments affecting the basic structure of the Constitution and examples of past attempted amendments concerning the powers of the King and constitutional monarchy.
Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)Azrin Hafiz
This document discusses the law around betrothal or a promise to marry in Malaysia. It defines betrothal as an agreement to marry between two parties. For a betrothal contract to be valid, there must be an offer and acceptance, consideration in the form of consent to marry, and the parties must have the capacity to marry. The document outlines the requirements for capacity including that the parties must be single, of age, not within a prohibited degree of relationship, and of religions that do not prevent marriage. It discusses exceptions and cases related to these requirements. The document also examines what constitutes a breach of contract if the betrothal is valid and potential defenses a defendant could raise. Finally, it lists the available remedies if
The document discusses the writ as a mode of originating process in court. It provides details on:
- The requirements for a writ to be deemed issued, including being numbered, signed, dated and sealed.
- The importance of the date of issue, which determines limitation periods and the lifespan of the writ.
- The options if a plaintiff's writ expires, such as issuing a new writ or applying to renew the writ.
- The rules regarding serving a writ on individuals and companies, including the various methods and exceptions.
Contents :
Definition
Importance
Attendance
Appearance
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
This document summarizes three court cases related to constitutional law in Malaysia:
1) Tan Tek Seng v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan, which found that a public servant's dismissal was unconstitutional as they were not given opportunity to be heard.
2) Inspector General of Police v Lee Kim Hoong, which upheld a detention under the Emergency Ordinance as the ordinance had been properly presented to Parliament.
3) Re the Detention of R.Sivarasa & Ors, which discussed requirements that an accused be informed of arrest grounds and limitations on judicial review of parliamentary proceedings.
This document is a high court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by Babbar Khan challenging his detention order under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act. The key details are:
1) Babbar Khan claimed the detention order violated his constitutional rights and was based on false FIRs. However, the court found the detaining authority had provided Khan with copies of the detention order and grounds in Urdu and informed him of his right to make representations.
2) While personal liberty is a fundamental right, preventive detention is allowed under Article 22(5) to prevent threats to public order. The goal is to prevent future harm, not punish past actions.
3) The court dismissed Khan's petition
The document discusses habeas corpus under Article 5(2) of the Malaysian constitution. It provides that habeas corpus guarantees the right to challenge unlawful detention in court. The court can order the production of a detained person and quash an illegal arrest or detention. However, habeas corpus does not apply in certain situations, such as when serving a lawful court sentence, lawful arrests for 24 hours, or remand under a magistrate's order. It also does not apply to challenges of trial legality, bail conditions, restriction orders, or detention for deportation under immigration law. The remedy in those cases is appeal through criminal procedure codes instead of habeas corpus.
The document discusses Article 5 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, which protects individuals from being deprived of life or personal liberty except in accordance with law. It summarizes the rights this article provides, including the right to know the grounds of arrest, the right to legal representation, and the right to be produced before a magistrate. It also discusses exceptions to these rights under emergency laws and the remedy of habeas corpus.
The appellant, a defense lawyer for Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, filed a motion to disqualify two prosecutors based on supporting documents. The High Court judge held the motion was baseless and proposed holding the appellant in contempt of court. In a summary hearing, the appellant was found guilty and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment. The Federal Court allowed the appeal, finding that: (1) the appellant was justified in filing the motion, so there was no abuse of court process; (2) the contempt charge was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) the appellant should have been granted an adjournment to fully prepare his defense, as denying this deprived him of a fair hearing.
Review of syariah court decisions by the high courtNoor Atikah
The document summarizes two court cases regarding the jurisdiction of civil and syariah courts in Malaysia to determine matters relating to a person's religion.
In the first case, the High Court held that under the Federal Constitution, civil courts cannot interfere with or set aside orders from Syariah courts, as their jurisdictions are separate.
The second case involved competing claims over the body of a deceased man from his Hindu wife and the Majlis Agama Islam. The Syariah Court had ordered the body be buried according to Islamic rites, but the High Court dismissed the wife's attempt to nullify his conversion to Islam, holding that it had no jurisdiction to review Syariah Court decisions or determine matters of Islamic
Rosmimah has been married to Sallehuddin for 20 years and they have 3 children together. Sallehuddin took a job in Dubai and the whole family moved there. After a year, he married Jenny in Dubai without divorcing Rosmimah. Rosmimah and the children then returned to Malaysia with Sallehuddin's consent. Sallehuddin did not provide maintenance. The document discusses whether Rosmimah and the children are entitled to maintenance given the circumstances. It also discusses the rights of inheritance for both Rosmimah and Jenny in the event of Sallehuddin's death considering the properties acquired during his marriages.
Article 5 Federal Constitution Malaysia - Liberty of a pesonNelfi Amiera Mizan
Article 5 of the Malaysian Federal Constitution provides rights to liberty of the person but contains some defects. It outlines exceptions where a person may be deprived of liberty but these exceptions have been interpreted too narrowly by courts. Compared to international standards like the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 5 does not sufficiently protect personal liberty and is easily overridden by security laws. Reforms are needed to strengthen Article 5's protections, such as amending absolute emergency powers and defining 'law' to incorporate principles of natural justice.
UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY IN MALAYSIA BEFORE AND AFTER 2012ASMAH CHE WAN
1) The document discusses Malaysian laws regarding unlawful and peaceful assemblies, including definitions, objectives, and analysis of relevant acts such as the Federal Constitution, Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, Police Act 1967, and Peaceful Assembly Act 2012.
2) It provides an overview of key provisions within these acts pertaining to unlawful assemblies, permits for assemblies, police powers, and criticisms of the Peaceful Assembly Act.
3) A comparison is made between Malaysian laws on freedom of assembly and those of the United States and Canada, noting differences in requirements for permits, restrictions on speech, and police responsibilities during assemblies.
This document discusses the legal rights of arrested persons in Malaysia, including the right to legal representation and habeas corpus. Some key points:
(1) Section 28A of the Criminal Procedure Code provides rights for arrested persons such as informing them of the grounds for arrest and allowing communication with a lawyer.
(2) Habeas corpus applications can challenge unlawful detentions and procedural improprieties in arrests and detentions. Courts have enforced compliance with mandatory legal requirements.
(3) The right to legal representation begins from the time of arrest, but may be reasonably restricted to facilitate police investigations. Overall the document analyzes various cases related to habeas corpus and legal rights after arrest.
The document summarizes the history and current state of the legal profession in Malaysia. It discusses:
- The legal profession in Malaysia is a fused profession with no distinction between solicitors and barristers.
- The earliest lawyers were known as "law agents" or "advocates and attornies", with the first admission recorded in 1808.
- Various ordinances established regulatory bodies for lawyers in different states, which were consolidated by the Legal Profession Act 1976, establishing the Malaysian Bar and Bar Council. However, Sabah and Sarawak continue to have their own separate legislation and professional bodies.
Article 13 of the Malaysian Constitution establishes the right to property and places limitations on when property can be deprived. Article 13(1) states that no one can be deprived of property without a law authorizing such deprivation. However, the term "law" incorporates the concept of "jus" or legitimate law, providing some safeguards against arbitrary or unreasonable laws. Article 13(2) allows for acquisition of property for public purposes or purposes beneficial to the economic development of Malaysia, as long as adequate compensation is provided. The courts can determine what constitutes adequate compensation under the Constitution.
The document summarizes key points about maintenance of a spouse under Malaysian family law:
1) Section 77 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act provides the court the power to order maintenance for a spouse in three situations: during matrimonial proceedings, when granting or after granting a divorce or judicial separation decree, or if a spouse is found alive after being presumed dead.
2) The court determines maintenance amounts based primarily on the means and needs of the parties, regardless of income proportions, but considers the responsibility of each party for the marriage breakdown.
3) The right to receive court-ordered maintenance ends if the recipient remarries or lives in adultery with another person.
(1) A Temporary Occupation License (TOL) allows temporary occupation of state land, mining land, or reserved land for a specified purpose.
(2) A TOL is issued by the Land Administrator with approval from relevant authorities and is valid only until the end of the calendar year. It can be renewed up to three times with approval from the State Authority.
(3) A TOL holder has rights of possession of the land but cannot transfer or assign the license. The license terminates upon the death of the holder or dissolution of a company holder.
This document discusses whether breach of promise to marry should remain a cause of action in Malaysian courts. It begins by explaining that in England, the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 abolished this cause of action, but notes that Malaysian law is not bound by English legislation due to cut-off dates under Section 3 of the Civil Law Act. The document then provides arguments for why breach of promise to marry remains a valid cause of action in Malaysia, such as to uphold the integrity of promises made and award exemplary damages for distress caused by breaches. Case examples are discussed throughout to support keeping this as a cause of action.
Criminal Law II - General Defences (Part 2)intnmsrh
The document summarizes general defences in criminal law, including consent, duress, and private defence.
Consent is not a defence if given under fear, misconception, unsoundness of mind, or by a minor. Duress is a defence for threats of instant death that reasonably cause apprehension, but not if the accused voluntarily exposed themselves to threats.
Private defence must be used to avert an impending danger, commences with reasonable apprehension of harm, and ends when the apprehension stops. More harm than necessary cannot be inflicted, and recourse to authorities must be attempted if possible.
Land Law II notes - For Revision Purposes OnlyAzrin Hafiz
This document summarizes 11 land law cases related to jual janji (conditional sale) transactions and lien cases in Malaysia. It provides brief summaries of the facts and outcomes of each case. The cases cover topics such as whether a transaction constituted a jual janji or outright sale, the right to redeem land after the agreed repayment period has expired, and priority of claims when charges or liens on land are involved.
The document summarizes the different methods of amending the Malaysian Constitution as outlined in Articles 159 and 161E. It discusses four methods: amendments requiring a simple majority in Parliament; a two-thirds majority in Parliament and consent of the Conference of Rulers; a two-thirds majority in Parliament and consent of the Governors of Sabah and Sarawak; and a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament. It also examines debates around amendments affecting the basic structure of the Constitution and examples of past attempted amendments concerning the powers of the King and constitutional monarchy.
Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)Azrin Hafiz
This document discusses the law around betrothal or a promise to marry in Malaysia. It defines betrothal as an agreement to marry between two parties. For a betrothal contract to be valid, there must be an offer and acceptance, consideration in the form of consent to marry, and the parties must have the capacity to marry. The document outlines the requirements for capacity including that the parties must be single, of age, not within a prohibited degree of relationship, and of religions that do not prevent marriage. It discusses exceptions and cases related to these requirements. The document also examines what constitutes a breach of contract if the betrothal is valid and potential defenses a defendant could raise. Finally, it lists the available remedies if
The document discusses the writ as a mode of originating process in court. It provides details on:
- The requirements for a writ to be deemed issued, including being numbered, signed, dated and sealed.
- The importance of the date of issue, which determines limitation periods and the lifespan of the writ.
- The options if a plaintiff's writ expires, such as issuing a new writ or applying to renew the writ.
- The rules regarding serving a writ on individuals and companies, including the various methods and exceptions.
Contents :
Definition
Importance
Attendance
Appearance
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
This document summarizes three court cases related to constitutional law in Malaysia:
1) Tan Tek Seng v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan, which found that a public servant's dismissal was unconstitutional as they were not given opportunity to be heard.
2) Inspector General of Police v Lee Kim Hoong, which upheld a detention under the Emergency Ordinance as the ordinance had been properly presented to Parliament.
3) Re the Detention of R.Sivarasa & Ors, which discussed requirements that an accused be informed of arrest grounds and limitations on judicial review of parliamentary proceedings.
This document is a high court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by Babbar Khan challenging his detention order under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act. The key details are:
1) Babbar Khan claimed the detention order violated his constitutional rights and was based on false FIRs. However, the court found the detaining authority had provided Khan with copies of the detention order and grounds in Urdu and informed him of his right to make representations.
2) While personal liberty is a fundamental right, preventive detention is allowed under Article 22(5) to prevent threats to public order. The goal is to prevent future harm, not punish past actions.
3) The court dismissed Khan's petition
The document summarizes key articles in the Malaysian Constitution related to fundamental rights and liberties. It discusses Articles 5-13, which protect rights such as liberty of the person, equality before the law, freedom of movement, religion, speech and property. For each article, it provides an overview of the rights protected, relevant court cases that have interpreted the scope of the rights, and ongoing debates or issues that have arisen in applying the articles. The document indicates that while the Constitution enshrines broad fundamental rights and liberties for Malaysians, there are ongoing discussions around limitations of these rights, particularly related to national security, public order and Malaysia's multi-religious society.
This document discusses the rule of law principle and its application in Malaysia based on several cases. It provides definitions and explanations of the rule of law from Dicey and Lord Bingham. Several cases are summarized that upheld the rule of law, including Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ismail regarding retrospective criminal laws, Ah Thian v Government of Malaysia on equality before the law, and Chai Choon Hon v Ketua Polis Daerah, Kampar on freedom of speech. The document concludes that while fundamental liberties in Malaysia are limited by some security laws, the country still generally respects the rule of law.
The document discusses the concept of rule of law. It summarizes British jurist A.V. Dicey's three aspects of rule of law: 1) no punishment without clear breach of law, 2) equality before the law regardless of status, and 3) judicial decisions protect individual rights. It then analyzes how well Malaysia upholds these aspects, noting issues like preventive detention laws and different court systems for different religious groups. The document also examines Joseph Raz's additional principles of rule of law and whether Malaysian law complies, finding issues like allowing some retrospective laws and limiting judicial review powers.
Somewhere amidst the unending human rights violations, prolonged court proceedings and bleak hopes, the word ‘justice’ has lost its meaning. In Hans Kelsen’s words, longing for justice is a man’s eternal longing for happiness.
Rule of Law and Violation of Human RightASMAH CHE WAN
This document discusses the principles of rule of law in Malaysia and examines some human rights violations. It begins by outlining the history and key principles of rule of law, including supremacy of law, equality before the law, and protection of individual rights. However, it notes that certain laws like the Sedition Act and Peaceful Assembly Act have been used to restrict freedoms and violate rights to speech, assembly, and due process. The document then analyzes several human rights issues in Malaysia, such as abuse of police powers, restrictions on media and political expression, and curbs on peaceful protests. It concludes that while Malaysia aims to uphold rule of law, certain security and public order laws have permitted excessive executive discretion and suspension of human
Here are the key points in response to your questions:
- Ho Kwan Seng established that the rule of natural justice requiring a person not be condemned unheard applies to every administrative action that adversely affects an individual, regardless of how the power is labeled. This extended natural justice protections beyond just "judicial" or "quasi-judicial" powers.
- Rohana Ariffin was significant as it was the first case to explicitly illustrate the application of procedural fairness in Malaysia. It established that procedural fairness requires the duty to give reasons for decisions that adversely impact individuals. It extended the obligations of decision-makers under natural justice/procedural fairness beyond just the right to be heard.
In summary, Ho
Judicial activism of the Supreme Court of IndiaShantanu Basu
This document discusses the concept and evolution of judicial activism in India. It provides context on how judicial activism emerged in response to failures of other branches of government and expanded the scope of judicial review. Key developments include:
1) The Supreme Court interpreted Article 21 of the constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, to include a variety of social and economic rights. This allowed judicial intervention in many new areas.
2) The Court also drew from Directive Principles of State Policy to support expanded interpretations of fundamental rights, setting precedents for public interest litigation on issues like legal aid, prisons, and the environment.
3) Landmark rulings established new principles in environmental law like "public trust doctrine
This document provides a summary and analysis of laws and practices regarding remand and detention in Bangladesh. It discusses several important Supreme Court cases that have established guidelines around remand. The BLAST v. Bangladesh case established guidelines to limit police power to arrest and detain, replacing the vague term "concerned" with a more specific term. The ASK v. Bangladesh case challenged unlawful detention of prisoners who had served their sentences. The document also analyzes sections of the Bangladesh criminal code related to remand and argues terms like "reasonable suspicion" are vague and open to misuse.
On the 24th of August 2017, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered its verdict in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India, unanimously affirming that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution. The verdict brought to an end a constitutional battle that had begun almost exactly two years ago, on August 11, 2015, when the Attorney-General for India had stood up during the challenge to the Aadhaar Scheme, and declared that the Constitution did not guarantee any fundamental right to privacy. The three judges hearing the case referred the constitutional question to a larger bench of five judges which, in turn, referred it further to a nine-judge bench. The case was argued over six days in the month of July 2017.
Six out of nine judges – Chelameswar, Bobde, Nariman, Sapre, Chandrachud and Kaul JJ – delivered separate opinions (Chandrachud J wrote for himself and on behalf of Khehar CJI, Aggarwal and Nazeer JJ). Spanning 547 pages, Puttaswamy is undoubtedly a historic and landmark verdict of our times, and one of the most important civil rights judgments delivered by the Supreme Court in its history. Apart from affirming the existence of the fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution ,it will have a profound impact upon our legal and constitutional landscape for years to come. It will impact the interplay between privacy and transparency and between privacy and free speech; it will impact State surveillance, data collection, and data protection, LGBT rights, the legality of food bans, the legal framework for regulating artificial intelligence, as well as many other issues that we cannot now foresee or anticipate. For this reason, the judgment
The Chief Justice heard arguments from the State regarding a public interest litigation concerning banners placed in Lucknow with personal details of over 50 individuals accused of vandalism.
The State argued the Court did not have jurisdiction and the banners served the public interest of deterring unlawful behavior. However, the Court found no law permitted disclosing personal details and this violated privacy rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.
While the State can maintain law and order, it cannot violate fundamental rights. The banners interfered with privacy without statutory backing. Privacy is a fundamental right in India, recognized globally and integral to human dignity. Therefore, the Court ruled the banners must be removed.
1. The document discusses the concept of "suo moto" rule in Bangladesh, which allows judges to initiate legal proceedings on their own motion to protect fundamental rights and ensure justice for disadvantaged groups.
2. Key points made include that suo moto rule allows for rapid resolution of cases, creates accountability for public institutions, deters illegal behavior by powerful actors, and provides access to justice for vulnerable populations.
3. Examples of suo moto in Bangladesh include cases protecting children from unjust imprisonment and responding to media reports about rights violations. While an important tool, suo moto also has limitations such as judges initiating cases based on unverified information.
The document analyzes leading Supreme Court cases related to national security, public order, and rule of law. It discusses two key Supreme Court cases - Anuradha Bhasin vs Union of India and Ram Manohar Lohia vs State of Bihar. In Anuradha Bhasin, the Supreme Court held that the government must disclose all orders restricting internet access. In Ram Manohar Lohia, the court distinguished between 'law and order', 'public order', and threats affecting 'national security', with increasing levels of threat. The document examines over 125 Supreme Court judgments to understand jurisprudence around balancing security concerns with civil liberties and rule of law.
This document discusses Shariah law and its sources and applicability in modern times. It outlines four main elements/sources of Shariah law: the Quran, hadiths, ijma (consensus of Islamic scholars), and qiyas (analogical reasoning). It also describes three categories of crimes under Shariah law - hadd (fixed punishments for offenses against God), qisas (equivalence law for intentional injuries), and tazir (discretionary punishments). The document aims to explain the concept of hudud (hadd crimes/punishments) and its suitability today given criticisms of its implementation.
Judicial review is the power of the courts to determine the constitutionality
Of legislative acts in a case instituted by aggrieved person.
It is the power of the court to declare a legislative act on the grounds
of Unconstitutionality.
People and entities seek judicial review to obtain remedy from an agency decision if they feel they have been injured.
Judicial review is an example of separation of powers in a modern government system( where judiciary is one of the branches of government).
Constitutional Law 5 - Rts of Accused PersonsKevin YL Tan
The document discusses key provisions in Part IV of the Singapore Constitution relating to fundamental liberties and human rights, including Articles 9, 11-15. It analyzes judicial interpretations of these rights to liberty, equal protection, freedom of speech and religion. It also examines how these rights can be overridden by legislation passed under the Internal Security Act for reasons of public security and emergency powers in Article 149.
The Constitutional Court has handed down several judgements regarding the right to vote in South Africa. It found that South African citizens living abroad have the right to vote if registered. It also ruled that denying prisoners the right to vote was unconstitutional. Parliament later amended the law to disenfranchise prisoners serving sentences without the option of a fine. The rule of law requires that the state exercises power as authorized by law. South African courts have invoked the rule of law to limit government power and ensure it complies with the constitution. The court also sought to protect the independence of the National Prosecuting Authority by invalidating laws that could compromise its independence or induce favoritism. However, some argue the appointment of the NPA head remains vulnerable
Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism. Sanjana Bharadwaj
This PPT will give you a breif idea on what is Judicial Review, how did it origionate in India with a reference of Judicial Activism and PIL along with examples and case laws.
Similar to A Judge With Many Landmark Decisions (20)
This document discusses burden and standard of proof in law of evidence. It defines burden of proof as the obligation to provide sufficient evidence to support one's case, and distinguishes between burden of establishing a case and evidential burden of introducing evidence. The standard of proof refers to the degree of probability required to discharge the burden. For criminal cases, the standard is proof beyond reasonable doubt, while for civil cases it is on a balance of probabilities. The more serious the allegation, the higher the standard of proof required.
1. A witness who is inconsistent in giving evidence, especially if the inconsistencies are material contradictions, cannot generally be regarded as a credible witness. However, not all inconsistencies necessarily undermine credibility.
2. For a witness to refresh their memory by referring to notes, certain conditions must be met under Section 159 of the Evidence Act. The writing must have been made by the witness at the time of the event or soon after.
3. Even if the conditions for refreshing memory are satisfied, the opposing party still has the right to inspect the document and cross-examine the witness on it. Referring to a document alone does not necessarily make the witness credible; it depends on whether the statutory safeguards are
The document discusses key concepts related to presumption and judicial notice in Malaysian law. It defines presumption as an inference drawn from known facts, and distinguishes between presumption of law and presumption of fact. It explains different types of presumptions under Malaysian law including those that the court "may presume", "shall presume", and those that constitute "conclusive proof". It also defines judicial notice as facts that a judge will notice without proof, and provides examples of facts that courts commonly take judicial notice of, such as identities of government leaders.
1. Samad Tuah bin Jebat was charged with stealing a motorbike under Section 379A of the Penal Code.
2. The prosecution argued for a heavier punishment to deter the increasing number of motorbike thefts in the area.
3. The defense pleaded for leniency as it was the accused's first offense, and he needed the motorbike due to desperation and intended to return it.
4. The magistrate found the accused guilty but discharged him with a bond for good behavior for 2 years, taking into account it was a first offense due to necessity, and that imprisonment may not be the solution.
This document provides the text of Malaysia's Child Act 2001, which consolidates and amends laws relating to the care, protection and rehabilitation of children. Some key points:
- It establishes the National Council for Children to oversee child welfare issues.
- It defines terms like "child", "Court for Children", and types of institutions like places of safety, refuge, detention, and approved schools.
- It covers issues like children in need of care/protection, criminal procedures for children, placing children in institutions, and the roles of protectors, probation officers, and other officials.
- It has transitional provisions to continue existing councils, rules, and childcare institutions established under previous laws.
This document provides an overview of the juvenile justice system in Malaysia. It discusses that 60% of Malaysia's population is under 30 years old, and that while perceptions are that juvenile crime is increasing, data is limited and inconsistent. For children accused of crimes, the Child Act of 2001 established specialized procedures and the Court for Children to handle their cases separately from adult procedures. The document outlines the key stages of handling a child in conflict with the law, from arrest to sentencing. It also discusses exceptions for serious crimes and status offenses. Overall, the document presents background on juvenile justice in Malaysia and the legal framework established in the Child Act.
PRINCIPLE OF PRIMA FACIE CASE AND MAXIMUM EVALUATION AT THE CLOSE OF PROSECUT...surrenderyourthrone
This document discusses the standard of proof required at the close of the prosecution's case in Malaysian criminal trials. It summarizes the key cases that addressed this issue, including Haw Tua Tau v Public Prosecutor, Khoo Hi Chiang v Public Prosecutor, and Public Prosecutor v Ong Cheng Heong. Public Prosecutor v Ong Cheng Heong established that only a prima facie case, not proof beyond reasonable doubt, is required at this stage. It clarified that a prima facie case means credible evidence for each essential element of the charge, subject to maximum evaluation but not equating to proof beyond reasonable doubt. This standard was affirmed in subsequent cases and resolved the long-
1) Several laws in Malaysia carry mandatory death penalties for offenses such as murder, drug trafficking, and treason. Between 1970-1996, 349 people were executed, mostly for drug offenses.
2) While the number of executions has decreased in recent years, official statistics show the death penalty has been ineffective in reducing drug addiction and the number of known addicts has risen.
3) Caning is a supplementary punishment to imprisonment for around 40 crimes including drug offenses, rape, and firearms offenses. However, caning violates international human rights standards against cruel or degrading treatment or punishment.
Baldah Toyyibah (Prasarana) Kelantan Sdn Bhd v Dae Hanguru Infra Sdn Bhd and ...surrenderyourthrone
The Court of Appeal was determining two appeals regarding a dispute over a construction agreement for the Kota Bharu-Kuala Krai Highway Project. The plaintiff had sued the defendants for breach of contract. The key issues were whether there was an enforceable contract and whether the plaintiff was entitled to compensation. The Court of Appeal allowed the first defendant's appeal and dismissed the plaintiff's appeal. It found that there was no valid contract between the parties due to a lack of consensus ad idem. While the plaintiff was later nominated as the contractor, this did not remedy the lack of consensus needed to form a valid contract. As the plaintiff did not prove a valid enforceable contract existed, it was not entitled to compensation for breach
The bankrupt appealed the dismissal of their application for discharge from bankruptcy. The creditor opposed the appeal, arguing that the Director General of Insolvency's (DGI) report was incomplete and unreliable. The court agreed that the DGI report failed to undertake a comprehensive investigation of the bankrupt's assets. As the DGI report is a main piece of evidence in bankruptcy cases, it should have been more detailed. The court dismissed the appeal, as it was not bound to accept an incomplete or unreliable report.
JUSTIFIKASI KEPERLUAN PENAHANAN REMAN MENURUT PERUNDANGAN ISLAM DAN SIVILsurrenderyourthrone
Dokumen tersebut membahasakan justifikasi keperluan penahanan reman menurut hukum Islam dan perundangan sivil. Penahanan reman dipraktikkan sejak zaman Nabi Muhammad sebagai salah satu prosedur penyiasatan untuk mencegah tertuduh melarikan diri dan menghancurkan bukti. Kebanyakan ulama Islam mengizinkan penahanan reman yang bersifat sementara untuk tujuan investigasi, bukan hukuman. Tempoh penahanan bervariasi menurut
The document is the Contracts Act 1950 of Malaysia. It contains 191 sections organized into 10 Parts that establish rules and principles related to contracts. Some key details include:
- The Act relates to contracts and was first enacted in 1950, with revisions in 1974 and 2006.
- Part I establishes preliminary definitions for terms used in the Act like proposal, acceptance, promisor, promisee, consideration, agreement, void, contract, and reciprocal promises.
- Parts II through IX cover topics like communication and revocation of proposals, void and voidable contracts, contingent contracts, performance of contracts, consequences of breach, indemnity and guarantee, bailment, and agency.
- Part X addresses the
This document provides an overview of Islamic law of property in Malaysia. It discusses several key topics:
1) The administration of Muslim estates, which can be testate (with a will) or intestate (without a will). Small estates valued under RM600,000 are distributed by land administrators according to Islamic inheritance law. Non-small estates are distributed by civil courts, who require a certificate from the sharia court.
2) Wills made by Muslims must comply with sharia principles and are adjudicated by sharia courts. Some states have enacted Muslim Wills Enactments to govern this.
3) Nominations in insurance policies and savings accounts are treated differently by different state fatwas regarding
WRITTEN AND ORAL IN ISLAMIC LAW - DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE AND NON-MUSLIMS IN MOR...surrenderyourthrone
This document discusses a case from 1881 in which a Jewish merchant named Ya'akov b. Shalom Assarraf sued a Muslim associate in a shari'a court in Fez, Morocco. Ya'akov presented a legal document as evidence that the defendant owed him money, and the judge ruled in Ya'akov's favor based solely on this documentary evidence, contradicting the common understanding that Islamic law privileged oral testimony over written documents. The document analyzes this case in the context of scholarship on evidentiary standards in Islamic law and the role of non-Muslims in shari'a courts, arguing it highlights the need to reexamine assumptions about the probative value of documents and legal interactions between religious groups in
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
1. A JUDGE WITH MANY LANDMARK DECISIONS
Emeritus Professor Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi
Holder of the Tunku Abdul Rahman Chair, Faculty of Law, University of Malaya
Justice Dato’ Mohd Hishamudin Mohd Yunus illuminated the judicial firmament for 23 years and
retired from the Court of Appeal on Sept 9, 2017. He was an exemplar of judicial integrity, fearless
independence and unwavering commitment to constitutional supremacy and human rights. He
saw law as an embodiment of justice and not a mere heathen word for power. Whenever he
could, he interpreted legal provisions in such a way as to promote fairness and equity.
He was a distinguished member of a very small band of Malaysian jurists in the “post-Salleh
Malaysian judiciary”1 who maintained fearless independence, resisted politicization and refused
to allow executive policies and priorities to trump the law and the Constitution. He acted with
even-handedness towards all persons, irrespective of race and religion or political affiliation. The
dominant tendency in the superior courts of his time, of allowing race and religion to outweigh
the Constitution, did not colour his judgments. His life was animated by the finest ideals of the
Constitution. The law in his hands was interpreted creatively and equitably.
How far his example and his judicial philosophy will be emulated by other judges remains to be
seen. What we can hope for is that in the new Malaysia after GE14, there will be more judges like
him who will honour their oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.
A SELECTION OF HIS PROMINENT JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Personal liberty: Throughout his judicial career, Justice Hishamudin showed tenderness for
fundamental liberties and exhibited a creative and activist streak in his interpretation of laws. He
will be remembered with respect by all those who believe that the judiciary must balance the
might of the state with the rights of citizens.2
The learned judge will most certainly be remembered for his Abdul Ghani Haroon v IGP trilogy.3
In this series of cases involving preventive detention under the Internal Security Act, he made a
number of bold and pioneering rulings. First, an applicant for habeas corpus has a right to be
present in court during the proceedings. This eminent ruling was overruled by the Federal Court
on a pedantic, literal and executive-minded interpretation of Article 5(2): “Where a complaint is
made … that a person is being unlawfully detained the court shall inquire into the complaint and,
1
“Post-Salleh Malaysian judiciary” refers to the judiciary after the suspension of the Lord President Tun Salleh
Abas and five other Supreme Court judges in 1988. Three of the six were ultimately dismissed.
2
Parts of this essay are drawn from the author’s article in The Star, “A Judge With Many Landmark
Decisions”, Reflecting on the Law, Thursday, 17 Sep 2015.
3
Abdul Ghani Haroon v Ketua Polis Negara [2001] 2 CLJ 574; Abdul Ghani Haroon v Ketua Polis Negara Application
(No. 3) [2001] 2 CLJ 709; Abdul Ghani Haroon v Ketua Polis Negara (Application (No. 4) [2011] 3 CLJ 606.
2. unless satisfied that the detention is lawful, shall order him to be produced before the court and
release him”. The apex court felt that the order of production should not be automatic and should
be issued only after the judge is satisfied that the detention is unlawful. It is humbly submitted
that the Federal Court was wrong and Justice Hishamudin was eminently correct. The proud
history of habeas corpus in other countries supports a tradition that the applicant is required to
be present in court rather than be heard in abstentia. To hold otherwise would make no sense if
there is allegation of torture, inhumane treatment or of custodial death. In such circumstances
the only way to establish facts is to produce the detainee in court. A second principle enumerated
by Justice Hishamudin was that the discretion of the police to arrest is not absolute. Judicial
review of executive discretion is possible if grounds of arrest and sufficient particulars are not
supplied and access to lawyer and family is denied. The right to see one’s family was a creative
interpretation of Article 5(1). Third, habeas corpus will issue if there is unreasonableness and bad
faith in police conduct. Justice Hishamudin emphasized an objective rather than a subjective
criterion to test the legality of police conduct. Fourth, in a courageous and innovative ruling, he
ruled that the police can be restrained from re-arresting the detainee immediately after release.
In another ISA case, Justice Hishamudin awarded the detainee in Abdul Malek Hussin bin Hussin
v Borhan bin Hj Daud & Ors [2008] 1 MLJ 368 RM2.5mil in damages for unlawful detention and
assault. His judgement was partly set aside on appeal.
All the above rulings ran counter to prevalent judicial subservience to executive perceptions of
security and public order in preventive detention cases.
In Muhamad Juzaili bin Mohd Khamis v. State of Negeri Sembilan [2015] 3 MLJ 513, the appellants
were Muslim men who, because of a gender identity disorder, had been expressing themselves
as women by wearing female clothes and make up. Section 66 of the Syariah Criminal Enactment
(Negeri Sembilan) 1992 made it an offence for any male Muslim to wear a woman’s attire or to
pose as a woman. The appellants had been repeatedly detained, arrested and prosecuted by the
religious authority. They challenged the constitutionality of Section 66. The High Court dismissed
the challenge. It was held by the Court of Appeal, with Justice Hishamudin writing the majority
opinion, that Section 66 interferes with the personal liberty of the appellants because it prevents
them from moving about in public places to reach their respective work places. The right to work
is part of their right to life in Article 5(1). Additionally, Section 66 was inconsistent with Article 8
of the Constitution because it unfairly subjected G.I.D. sufferers to the same provisions as other
normal males. It was further discriminatory because it singled out males who dressed like females
and said nothing about females who dress like males. Section 66 affects the appellants’ right to
freedom of expression, in that they are prohibited from expressing themselves in the way
dictated by their psychological make-up.
Equality: In Manoharan Malayalam & Anor v Dato’ Seri Mohd Najib Abdul Razak & Ors [2013] 8
CLJ 1010, the plaintiffs alleged that the Federal Government discriminated against Tamil primary
schools contrary to Articles 4, 8 and 12. The High Court refused locus standi (legal standing to
sue). Justice Hishamudin and his brother judges at the Court of Appeal overruled the High Court
3. and granted the applicants the right to submit their arguments because concerned citizens with
a bona fide complaint of human rights violation should have a right to be heard on merits.
In the famous transgender, cross-dressing case of Muhamad Juzaili [2015] 3 MLJ 513, Justice
Hishamudin wrote the unanimous opinion that section 66 of the Negri Sembilan Enactment
which penalises men who dress like a woman, but does not impose similar punishment on
women who dress like men, was a violation of the equality doctrine.
Speech and association: In the Muhammmad Hilman Idham v. Kerajaan Malaysia [2011] 9 CLJ
50 Justices Hishamudin and Linton Albert J. held that section 15(5)(a) of the Universities and
University Colleges Act, which forbade students from expressing any sympathy or support for any
political party, was contrary to the Constitution’s guarantees in Article 10. The decision
emphasized that parliament is not supreme, and the restrictions imposed on free speech must
be confined to the restrictions enumerated in Article 10(2). There must be a rational and not a
fanciful connection between the law and the object sought to be achieved.
Secrecy: In a dissenting judgment relating to the Official Secrets Act and the secrecy of a water
concession agreement, Justice Hishamudin disagreed with the majority that the Minister cannot
be compelled to disclose the agreement and the audit report: Minister of Energy, Water and
Communication & Anor v Malaysian Trade Union Congress & Ors [2013] 1 MLJ 61.
Property: In Ismail Bakar & Ors v Director of Land and Mines, Kedah Darul Aman [2010] 9 CLJ
810, the delay of nine years to effect payment for a compulsory acquisition order rendered the
order null and void. In Ee Chong Pang & Ors v The Land Administrator of the District of Alor Gajah
& Anor [2013] 2 MLJ 16, the failure of the Malacca government to comply with the mandatory
procedure of issuing Form A, invalidated the compulsory land acquisition order. In Syarikat
Pengangkutan Kesejahteraan Sdn Bhd v Tenaga Nasional BHD [2010] 1 CLJ 625, the right to
property under Article 13 was involved. There was an exercise of statutory power under the
Electricity Supply act 1990 to enter the private land for installation purposes. However, notices
required by the law were not addressed to the registered proprietor. There was no date for
hearing and there was inadequate description of the land in the notice. No proper assessment
inquiry was conducted. Compensation was not paid to the land owner but to a third party!
However, TNB gained occupation of the plaintiff’s land. It was held that the defendant’s
occupation of the disputed area was prima facie unlawful. The notices that were issued were
defective. There was no proper assessment inquiry. As such, there was a violation of Article 13(1)
of the Constitution which requires that no person shall be deprived of his property save in
accordance with the law. The Defendant’s claim for restitution against the third party (that had
received the compensation) could not be granted because the Defendant had not come to the
court with clean hands.
In Jitender Singh A/L Pagar Singh & Ors v. Pentadbir Tanah Wilayah Persekutuan [2008] 7 MLJ
479 there was a dispute as to the amount of compensation for the compulsory acquisition of
property. Under Section 40(2) of the Land Acquisition Act 1960, two assessors were appointed
4. and they had the power to decide upon the amount of compensation. Where the assessors differ
from each other, the judge shall elect to concur with the decision of one of the assessors. Justice
Hishamudin held that both assessments were reasonable, but he adopted the evaluation which
favoured the land owners. To his mind, this was in consonance with the spirit of Article 13.
Syariah courts: The Malaysian legal system enshrines both Islam and liberal rights. Since the 90s
these dual commitments provide contending visions for the state and society. A number of
controversial cases from the courts of law indicate how many superior court judges have become
co-opted to ride along on the ‘Islamic state’ bandwagon. A 'rights-versus-rites binary' has been
constructed in law, politics, and the popular imagination.4 Many judges have sidestepped
constitutional supremacy to give primacy to religion and the religious establishment. Syariah-civil
court conflict of jurisdiction cases have proliferated. Many superior court judges, at the slightest
whiff of Islamic law, surrender jurisdiction to the Syariah courts. Justice Hishamudin is not one
of them. While acknowledging the jurisdiction of Syariah courts in matters assigned exclusively
to them by the Constitution’s Schedule 9 List II Paragraph 1, Justice Hishamudin, in the case of
Dato’ Kadar Shah Tun Sulaiman v Datin Fauziah Haron [2008] 4 CLJ 504, ruled that a trust, even
between Muslims, was a matter within federal jurisdiction. Even though the Defendant was
arguing that there was a Muslim gift (a topic in the State List) and not a trust (a topic in the
Federal List), there was no ouster of the civil court’s jurisdiction.
The learned judge laid down a number of guidelines. (1) Where there is an issue of competing
jurisdiction between the civil court and Syariah Court, the proceedings before the High Court
must take precedence over the Syariah Court. (2) Whether this case involved a Muslim gift (a
Syariah court matter) or a civil trust (a civil court matter) is an issue that is not severable and
therefore in the civil court’s jurisdiction. (3) Questions of breach of trust came within the
jurisdiction of the High Court. Any dispute pertaining to the Law of Trusts is outside the
jurisdiction of the Syariah courts (4) The High Courts are superior courts and the Syariah Courts
are inferior tribunals existing under State law. As such, the High Court has supervisory jurisdiction
over all inferior tribunals including Syariah Courts. (5) Article 121(1) and (1A) must not be
interpreted literally or rigidly but must be interpreted purposively. (6) Civil courts are ousted only
if the Syariah Court has exclusive jurisdiction.
In Siti Hasnah Vangarama Abdullah v Tun Dr Mahthir Mohamad (As the President of Perkim)
[2012] 7 CLJ 845, a seven-year-old child born into a Hindu family was converted to Islam by
Muslim religious authorities in Penang without the consent of her parents. On reaching maturity
she challenged the constitutionality of her forced conversion. A question arose whether the civil
court or the Syariah court had jurisdiction over the matter. Justice Hishamudin held that (1) A
subject matter does not cease to be within the jurisdiction of the civil courts just because it has
an Islamic element in it. (2) As there was an allegation that the child was made to renounce her
religion in an unconstitutional and illegal manner, therefore, the fundamental rights of the
parents and the child under Articles 11 and 12 were involved and the civil High Court had
4
Tamir Moustafa, Constituting Religion: Islam, Liberal Rights, and the Malaysian State,
https://www.cambridge.org/core
5. exclusive jurisdiction. (3) A High Court must be extremely cautious and slow in declining
jurisdiction and in coming to the conclusion that the subject matter of an action falls within the
exclusive jurisdiction of the Syariah Courts especially if fundamental rights are involved. (4) The
civil courts cannot interfere with the Syariah court only if the matter is within the exclusive
jurisdiction of the Syariah court.
Binding precedent: In pursuing justice, Datuk Hishamudin occasionally unshackled himself from
the doctrine of binding judicial precedent. In Raja Segaran a/l S Krishnan v Malaysian Bar [2008]
4 MLJ 941, he refused locus standi to a lawyer who wished to prevent the Bar Council from
discussing the misconduct of the then Chief Justice. Though only a High Court judge then, he
strongly disagreed with a Court of Appeal judgment to bar such discussion. In Dato’ V
Kanagalingam v David Samuels [2006] 3 CLJ 909 the Plaintiff, in a commercial suit, had
manipulated the process of the court to secure a judge of his choice and obtain a mandatory
injunction in the High Court in relation to 540,000 shares. The Court of Appeal in the exercise of
its inherent power had ordered the preservation of the status quo pending appeal. Undaunted,
the Plaintiff applied to the Federal Court for leave to appeal. Leave was granted and the apex
court harshly criticised the alleged lack of neutrality of the Court of Appeal and ordered parts of
the Court of Appeal judgment to be expunged. The Defendant then published an article in an
international magazine criticizing the Plaintiff’s conduct. The Plaintiff sued in defamation. At the
High Court, Justice Hishamudin dismissed the suit on a number of grounds – that the pleading
was defective; that the Plaintiff’s wrongful conduct and manipulation of the process of the court
was the main reason for the publication of the article. In addition, Justice Hishamudin, then a
High Court judge, strongly criticized the Federal Court that had heard the case as being
unconstitutionally constituted. A High Court judge had been illegally coopted by the Chief Justice
to sit on the Bench in disregard of Article 122(2).
In Ishak Hj Shaari v PP [2011] 2 CLJ 46 the issue was whether the Court of Appeal as the apex
court for appeals from the Sessions Court has the inherent power to reopen and set aside an
earlier order of the same court? The majority held that the review jurisdiction or review powers,
not being derived from Article 121(1B), were limited to practice and procedure and could not
extend to setting aside an earlier decision. In his dissent, Justice Hishamudin invoked the “judicial
power” of Article 121(1) and held that the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal had inherent
jurisdiction to review their previous decisions under exceptional circumstances or to prevent an
injustice or abuse of the process of the courts.
Law reform: In Abdul Ghani Haroon v Ketua Polis Negara and another application [2001] 2 MLJ
689 the learned judge invited Parliament to abolish or review the ISA “to prevent or minimise the
abuses highlighted in (his) judgment”.
Misconduct by judges and lawyers: In several judgments, Justice Hishamudin did not hesitate to
take to task lawyers or judges who strayed from the path of justice or propriety. In Dato’ V.
Kanagalingam v David Samuels & Ors [2006] 6 MLJ 521, a prominent lawyer made a RM100
million libel claim against the author of an article in a commercial magazine. In dismissing the
6. claim, Justice Hishamudin referred to the lawyer’s wrongful conduct in the Ayer Molek case5
which the Court of Appeal had taken judicial note of. He held that a person cannot bring an action
based on his own wrong-doing. He also had harsh words for the illegally constituted Federal Court
quorum which ordered the Court of Appeal remarks to be expunged.
Administrative law: In Manoharan Malayalam vs Dato’ Seri Mohd Najib Tun Hj Abdul Razak
[2013] 8 CLJ 1010, the issue was whether the plaintiffs who alleged that the Federal Government
discriminated against Tamil primary schools, had locus standi to commence the proceedings. It
was held by Justice Hishamudin on behalf of the majority that where the complaint is that the
Federal Government or its agents had violated the Constitution by its action or legislation, the
plaintiff has locus to challenge the unconstitutionality without the necessity of showing that his
personal interest or some special interest of his has been adversely affected. The learned court
relied on the opinion in Robert Linggi v The Government of Malaysia [2011] 7 CLJ 373 and
affirmed the trend of liberalisation of the rules of locus standi. It was held that wherever there
is a bona fide complaint by a concerned citizen of a violation of the Constitution, he has a right
to knock on the doors of justice.
However, a different approach was adopted, and rightly so, by the Court of Appeal in State
Government of Selangor vs Murtini Kasman [2014] 7CLJ 773. The issue here was that the
opposition Pakatan Rakyat Coalition had issued a campaign manifesto promising an allowance to
every single mother in Selangor. The promise was not honoured and a group of single mothers
went to the court. The High Court held that the mothers had a reasonable cause of action and a
legitimate expectation. On appeal to the Court of Appeal it was held that a government cannot
be bound by an election manifesto which is more of a moral obligation. Also, there is no room
for the doctrine of legitimate expectation in relation to election promises.
Civil procedure: In Rashidah Mohammad vs Mayban Finance Bhd [2003] 2 CLJ 542 there was a
simple issue of procedure - the defendant Bank had applied to transfer the proceedings to the
High Court of Kuala Terengganu from the High Court in Kuala Lumpur. Under the Rules of the
High Court 1980 there is no provision for the exercise of such power. But true to his belief in
inherent powers of the court, Justice Hishamudin held that there is merit in the Defendant’s
application because the plaintiff has an address in Dungun, the defendant has a branch office in
Terengganu and the plaintiff’s claim emanated from a suit commenced in Kuala Terengganu High
Court. The defendant’s witnesses reside in Terengganu. Justice would best be served if the
proceedings are transferred.
Legal personality: In the case of Chin Yoke Teng v. William Ui Yee Mein [2005] 1 CLJ 819, there
was a civil suit by a lady for breach of promise to marry. In her action against the defendant, the
plaintiff added her unborn child as the second plaintiff to the proceedings. It was held that under
5
Ayer Molek Rubber Co Bhd & Ors v Insas Bhd & Anor [1995] 2 MLJ 734]
7. various laws including the Interpretation Acts 1948 & 1967, an unborn child has no legal
personality to sue.
In sum, Justice Hishamudin’s life was one of courage, conviction and judicial activism. He left
behind large footprints. His years on the Bench were marked by integrity, fearless independence
and an unwavering commitment to do justice on the facts of each case. After his retirement, he
remains active in legal affairs and staff and students of law schools continue to benefit from his
wisdom and experience in many areas
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
One aspect of Justice Hishamudin’s judicial life that attracted controversy in some circles was his
creative, activist and liberal interpretation of the law. A look at his decisions indicates that he was
not supportive of a passive role for the judiciary. In fact, in an erudite article in 2011, he openly
supported judicial activism. In his words judicial activism refers to “a judicial decision that is
creative, that breathes life into the law; a decision that involves inductive reasoning, that is
positive and takes into account the social needs of the time, whilst at the same time paying heed
to the principles of justice and the legal and constitutional framework within which that decision
is made”6. In his article, Justice Hishamudin chose as an example of judicial activism the decision
of Tan Sri Wan Suleiman to convene the Supreme Court during the tragic events of the judicial
crisis of 1988. Lord President Tun Salleh had been suspended by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and
a tribunal, headed by Tun Salleh’s Deputy, was constituted to try him. Tun Salleh applied to the
High Court for an injunctive relief to stop the Tan Sri Hamid Omar Tribunal from delivering its
recommendations. The High Court judge Ajaib Singh J deliberately delayed the disposition of the
application. Tun Salleh applied to the Supreme Court. Tan Sri Hamid Omar as the Acting Lord
President would normally have the right to convene a session of the Supreme Court under
Section 39(1) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. Instead, he instructed the court registrar to
prevent the application from being filed. In the face of the various impediments placed before
the court on the instructions of Tan Sri Hamid Omar, and given the conflict of interest situation
involving Tan Sri Hamid, Tan Sri Wan Suleiman, as the next most senior judge, convened an urgent
sitting of the Supreme Court which issued an order of prohibition. For his moral courage and
independence, Tan Sri Wan Suleiman was suspended and later dismissed. Dato’ Hishamudin
refers to the decision of Tan Sri Wan Suleiman as an act of great judicial activism.
Building on Dato’ Hishamudin’s views, it is suggested that a judicial decision is “activist” or
“creative” if:
• It is non-literal; it rejects strict textualism or plain meaning of the words.
• It is not based on the actual words but on the legislative history.
• It views the law holistically i.e. reads rules in the context of the whole legal system. It
emphasizes coherence and harmony and reads a norm as part of the whole system.
6
“Judicial Activism – The Way To Go?” [2012] 6 MLJ xvii
8. • It supplements (formal) rules with “non-rule standards”, i.e. with principles, presumptions
and a dimension of morality. The decision has an innate sense of equity and justice and right
and wrong.
• It takes note not only of the letter but also the spirit of the law i.e. it looks not only at rules
but behind them to their idealistic purpose (purposive interpretation).
• It looks not only at rules but beyond them to their consequences. What inspires the decision
is not the content but the consequence; not the form but the functioning; not what the law
says but what the law does.
• It escapes the icy grip of precedent and refuses to allow the dead hand of the past to dictate
to the present.
Having defined judicial creativity as above, let me administer one caution. Creativity and justice
are not always fellow-travelers. Regrettably, it is often the case that judges exercise their genius
to interpret the law creatively to expand the horizons of power and constrict those of freedom.
For example, in Ooi Ah Phua v Officer in Charge Criminal Investigation, Kedah/Perlis [1975] 2 MLJ
198 the arrestee sought to enforce his Article 5(3) right “to consult and be defended by a legal
practitioner of his choice”. The learned judge held that though the right exists from the moment
of arrest, it can only be exercised after police have completed their investigation! The judicial
gloss on the law rewrote Article 3 in the name of public order but to the detriment of the hapless
detainee.
In Hjh Halimatussaadiah Hj Kamaruddin v Public Service Commission Malaysia & Anor [1992] 1
CLJ 413 freedom of religion in Article 11 was interpreted to mean only the essential, mandatory
practices of religion - which is not how the faithful view things.
In Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Ors [2007] 4 MLJ 585 and a host of
decisions on attempted apostasy, the freedom of conscience of the parties in Article 11 was
subjected by the Federal Court to the prior permission of the Syariah court. Where does this prior
permission requirement come from? Not from Article 11(5) – restriction on religious freedom on
the ground of “public order, public health and morality”. Not from Schedule 9 List II Para 1 which
permits “creation and punishment of offences against the precepts of Islam” “except in relation
to matters in the Federal list or covered by federal law”. Lina Joy was not being prosecuted for a
crime. The prior permission of the Syariah court appears to be a pure judicial gloss on the law to
appease Malay-Muslim public opinion and at the same time recognize the constitutional
freedom, though in a nominal way.
In support of Justice Hishamudin’s views on judicial activism it is submitted that there are many
moral, philosophical and interpretive imperatives that support judicial creativity.
The judiciary is a moral institution: More than the executive and the legislature, the judiciary is
the bulwark of our liberties and protector and guardian of values on which a democratic, rule of
law society thrives. It is often the case that for electoral reasons, the executive and the legislature
look away when injustices blight our society. This is where the moral role of the judiciary becomes
9. important. For example, in the USA, while the atrocities of racial discrimination blazed, the
executive and the legislature slept till the sixties. The Supreme Court in Brown Et Al. v Board of
Education of Topeka Et Al. 347 U.S. 483 stepped in to roll back by the tide of discrimination.
The reality of uncontrolled executive power: Throughout the world there has been a massive
enlargement of the bureaucratic apparatus of the State. The traditional parliamentary techniques
for providing a check and balance and for supervising the administration are not working well.
Therefore, it is imperative that judicial control over the administration be proportionally
strengthened. According to Prof. Wade “as liberty is subtracted, justice must be added”.
Time-frame problems: The Constitution is a document not just for the present but for posterity.
Its wisdom could not possibly have calculated for the felt necessities of today and tomorrow. It
must be interpreted to keep pace with the march of time, to stay sensitive to the rise and fall of
ideas, and to remain abreast of the tides that wash at our shores. Provisions enacted in one age
need to be applied in a time frame of the continuum to problems of another age. A present time
frame interpretation to a past time frame statute invariably involves the judge in a time travel
from the past to the present. The judge has to leap-frog decades to apply the law to the felt
necessities of the times. For example, the concept of ‘property’ in Article 13 drafted in 1957 must
take note of the age of copyright, trademark, patents and industrial designs today. Freedom of
speech must wake up to the cyber age.
Novel situations require holistic view: Life is always larger than the law and the glittering
generalities of the law cannot anticipate all the vicissitudes of life. Now and then novel situations
arise on which the law provides no guidance. For example, does Article 5(1) on personal liberty
give to an accused a right to an expeditious trial? Does an indigent have a right to legal aid as part
of due process under Article 5 and equal protection under Article 8? Whenever rules run out, as
they sometimes do, the judge should not wring his hands in despair. He should adopt a prismatic
approach to the clauses of the Constitution and read into the text, some non-textual,
unenumerated, implied rights. He should reach out into the heart of legal darkness where the
flames of precedent fade and flicker and extract from there some raw materials with which to
fashion a sign-post to guide the law. The contemporary philosopher Ronald Dworkin gives similar
advice in situations where rules run out. According to him, the law consists of rules and non-rule
standards. The judge can rely on principles, doctrines and standards to assist in his decision.
These non-rule standards are an integral part of the majestic, seamless web of the law. A
constitutional court is entitled to view the whole matrix of the law in arriving at his decision.
Ambiguities: The law of the Constitution is so full of ambiguities and conflicts that often the judge
must reach out beyond formal rules to seek a solution to the problem at hand.
Interpretation is a creative task: The law is in language and most legal words are like amoebas
constantly changing shape. Interpretation is an art, not a science. The interpretive task, in its
functioning, if not in its form, is virtually indistinguishable from the law constitutive task. As
10. Justice Holmes pointed out poetically: “A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged, it is
the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content according to the
circumstances and the time in which it is used… It is for the judge to give meaning to what the
legislature has said”. (Towne v Eisner, Collector of United States Internal Revenue for the Third
District of the State of New York 235 U.S. 418)
The number of theories on judicial interpretation is so varied and the taxonomy is so confusing
that the analysis and classification of the various theories is rather subjective and imprecise.7
Given the richness of approaches, it is easy to agree with McHugh J that “any theory of
constitutional interpretation must be a matter of conviction based on some theory external to
the Constitution itself”.8
It is proposed to lump all theories of statutory construction in two categories:
(i) Literal interpretation, and
(ii) Liberal interpretation.
Among the theories of literal interpretation are the following:9
Textual: This is also referred to as literalism, strict textualism, or the plain meaning theory. It is
often described as originalism10 or positivism.11 Decisions should be based on the ordinary
meaning of the actual words of the written law if the meaning is unambiguous. A verbis legis non
est recedendum. “From the words of the law there is not any departure”. Textualism is an
originalist theory that makes primary reliance on the text itself and non-textual sources like the
drafters’ intention or natural law are not binding.
Doctrinal: Decision should be based on the prevailing, normative practices or opinions of legal
professionals. Argumentum a simili valet in lege. “An argument from a like case avails in law’.
This approach is consistent with a rigid application of the doctrine of stare decisis.
In contrast, there are many theories of liberal interpretation:
Historical intention: Decision should not be based on the actual words but on the legislative and
case history. Intention of the drafters is important. Animus hominis est anima scripti. “Intention
is the soul of the instrument”. The law should be interpreted purposively. A slight variation is that
7
Malayan Law Journal, Halsbury’s Laws of Malaysia, vol. 3(2) (at 19 May 2018), Constitutional Law, ’15
Constitutional Interpretation’ [100 207]
8
McGinty v Western Australia (1996) 186 CLR 140 at 230.
9
Gary Lawson, The Constitutional Case Against Precedent, 17 Harv. J.L. & Public Policy 23, 24 (1994)
10
McGinnis, J O and Rappaport, M B “Original Methods Originalism: New Theory of Interpretation and the Case
Against Construction”, (2009) 103(2) Northwestern University Law Review 751-802.
11
Purcell Jr E A, “Democracy, the Constitution and Legal Positivism in America: lEssopns from a Winding and
Troubled History”, Florida law review 66(4) (2015) 19 May 2018 https://scholarship.law.ufl.
Edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1209&content=flr
11. some jurists emphasise the original intention of the actual text and not of the drafters, which
converts this approach to a literal approach.
Functional: This is also referred to as the pragmatic, consequentialist, prudentialist or economic
approach. The social, political and economic consequences of alternative interpretations must
be regarded. Not the content but the consequence, not the form but the functioning is important.
Not what the law says, but what it does must be noted. When the declared law leads to unjust
or undesirable results or raises issues of public policy or public interest, judges around the world
try to find ways of adding moral colours or public policy shades to the legal canvas. In this
sociological, functional, consequentialist approach, factual data from society is collected and
analysed to understand the working of the law and law’s actual consequences. This is referred to
as the “Brandeis Brief” method of lawyering in the courts.
One could note for instance that public interest interpretation of Article 5(3) in Ooi Ah Phua v
Officer in Charge Criminal Investigation, Kedah/Perlis [1975] 2 MLJ 198 in which the constitutional
right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of one’s choice was judicially interpreted
to come alive only after police have completed their investigation.
In Hjh Halimatussaadiah Hj Kamaruddin v Public Service Commission Malaysia & Anor [1992] 1
CLJ 413, a public servant’s freedom of religion was subjected to a “reasonable restriction” not
enumerated in Article 11(5). In a string of cases under Article 8, the Courts have grafted the
judicial concept of “rational classification” to classify citizens in different categories for purposes
of the equality doctrine. Witness the pension case of Government of Malaysia v VR Menon [1990]
1 MLJ 277.
In the party-hopping case of Dewan Undangan Negeri Kelantan & Anor v Nordin bin Salleh & Anor
[1992] 1 MLJ 697 the judges adopted a consequentialist approach. The consequence of the anti-
hopping law will be that a punishment will follow the exercise of the fundamental right to
association.
Structural: Decision should emphasise the coherence and harmony of the system. The law should
be read as a whole. A statutory provision should be read in the light of other provisions of the
legislation. One Nemo aliquam partem recte intelligere potest antequam totum perlegit. “No one
can properly understand a part until he has read the whole”.
Natural law approach: This is also called the equitable, ethical, aspirational and natural law
approach. Decision must be based on an innate sense of justice, balancing of interests and what
is right and wrong regardless of what the written law provides. Equitas est perfecta quodam ratio
quoe jus scriptum interpretatur et emendat; nulla scriptura comprehensa, sed sola ratione
consistens. “Equity is a perfect reason which interprets and amends written law”.12 Decisions are
12
Coke, Littleton, 24.
12. based on natural law and a theory of higher law. An unjust law is not law - lex injusta non est lex.
The judge takes note of what is required or advised by the laws of nature. Jura nature sunt
immutabilia. “The laws of nature are unchangeable”.
Dworkinian holistic approach: According to Ronald Dworkin, law includes rules as well as non-
rule standards that have grown up in the life of the community. A judge must interpret the law
holistically, reading a section in the context of other sections and a statute in the context of other
statutes that are pari materia. If the formal rules lead to injustice, it is the job of the judge to
mitigate the harshness of the law by reading the statute in the light of doctrines, principles and
a dimension of morality. Dworkin rejects lex injusta non est lex but advises judges at the
interpretive stage to use the moral paint brush to add colours to the legal canvas. Justice
Hishamudin did that often.
Prudential: In the related prudential approach, decisions should be based on factors external to
the law such as the convenience of overburdened officials, avoidance of litigation or of disturbing
a stable body of practices, or efficiency of government operations. Boni judicis est lites dirimere.
“The duty of a good judge is to prevent litigation”.
Rules of interpretation: Along with theories of interpretation, there are scores of rules of
interpretation. For example, the rule of “literal interpretation”, the rule of “purposive
interpretation” the “golden rule”, the rule of “harmonious construction”, the Mischief rule13,
“later overrides former”, “special overrides general”, the “doctrine of pith and substance” and
the “rule of ejus dem generis”.
In response to the multiplicity of rules of interpretation, it is often said in jest that the golden rule
is that there are no golden rules!
Consistency in principle: It is submitted that if judicial creativity is permissible to expand the
powers of the State, then it should also be permissible to expand the horizons of freedom. We
must be consistent in principle and not hide behind separation of powers in some situations but
add judicial colours to the law in others to provide legitimacy to expansive exercises of power.
Separation of powers or check and balance? Separation of powers need not mean strict
compartmentalization of Montesquieu. It can also refer to check and balance of Madison. It can
also refer to a diarchal allocation of the same power to more than one branch of the State, to
keep anyone from exercising unlimited competence. Judicial review and judicial activism are
essential aspects of check and balance.
Judicial activism is inherent in a supreme Constitution: In addition to the moral, philosophical
and interpretive imperatives, the Constitution of Malaysia is framed in such a way that judicial
13
Rule in Heydon’s Case (1584) 3 Co Rep 7a, 76 ER 637)
13. activism is an inherent, inevitable and indispensable part of the constitutional and legal system.
The Constitution is supreme. Any pre or post Merdeka law that violates the Constitution can be
invalidated by the courts. Parliament is not supreme. There is a chapter on fundamental liberties.
In a federal system of government, there is a clear demarcation of federal-state powers on
legislative, executive, judicial and financial matters. Though Islam is the religion of the
Federation, it is not the basic law of the land and applies in only 24 areas enumerated in Sch 9
List II Para 1. Some provisions of the Constitution are entrenched against easy repeal or
amendment and judicial review is available if the mandated procedures are not complied with.
Constitutional interpretation is a class of its own: Constitutional philosophers are generally in
agreement that a Constitution is a living document and cannot be interpreted literally or
pedantically: Badan Peguam v Kerajaan [2008] 2 MLJ 285. This is the “living tree” approach
towards interpreting the Constitution. Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor [1981] 1 MLJ 64 asserted
that the term ‘law’ in the Constitution includes natural justice. In the Singapore Constitutional
Reference No. 1 of 1995 [1995] 2 SLR 201, a purposive interpretation was emphasized.14
One must bear in mind that the Constitution is not just a lawyer’s document, but also the vehicle
of a community’s legal, political and social life. It is the repository of the nation’s dreams and
demands, its values and vulnerabilities. It seeks to reconcile the irreconcilable conflict between
the might of the State and the rights of the citizens.
A Constitution is not drafted just to protect the rich but also to liberate the poor, the orang asli,
the marginalized and the disadvantaged. While reflecting existentialist realities, it is meant to be
dynamic and transformative.
A Constitution is not the last will and testament of our forefathers. It is a document of destiny for
the generations to come.
A Constitution is not just black-letter words (as the majority in Kok Wah Kuan v Public Prosecutor
[2007] 5 MLJ 174 implied by rejecting the unwritten doctrine of separation of powers). A
Constitution has a spirit and a soul. It is founded on values of freedom and justice and doctrines
like rule of law, separation of powers and natural justice.
It is the duty of judges to enforce these values. Constitutionalism and constitutional supremacy
are not promoted if the interpretation that is chosen is literally possible but promotes absolutism,
shields abuse of power and prevents accountability.
More than most judges of his time, Justice Hishamudin reflected these values. Malaysian
jurisprudence owes him a great debt of gratitude.
14
However, Rajeevan Edakalavan v Public Prosecutor [1998] 1 SLR 815 preferred strict textualism. Likewise, Loh
Kooi Choon [1977] 2 MLJ 187 gave primacy to the written text. Dato Menteri Othman Baginda [1981] 1 MLJ 29
emphasized the sui generis principle of interpretation.