SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 48
Download to read offline
A-F Accountability
  Improving Transparency
            &
     Student Success


        November 7, 2011
The new A–F model

The information in this presentation
reflects the proposed rule approved by the
Indiana State Board of Education on
11.7.11 and is subject to change.
The new A–F model
• Simplifies designations awarded to schools

• Incorporates Indiana Growth Model into accountability
  (elementary & middle schools)
   – Focuses on closing achievement gaps
   – Focuses on all students, not just the “bubble kids”

• Recognizes 4- and 5-year graduation rates (high schools)

• Includes College & Career Readiness as a measure of
  school success (high schools)
Which Schools are Assessed?

• Public schools (Traditional & Charter)
• Accredited non-public schools
• Nonpublic schools accredited by an entity
  recognized by the Indiana State Board of
  Education that participate in the voucher
  system
Growth & Improvement Targets
• Preliminary scores may be raised or lowered
  based on schools meeting set targets



• Targets are based on the three-year average
  growth or improvement of the top or bottom
  quartile of schools*
    *For AY 2011-12 the ECA targets are based on a two-year average and will be updated for AY 2012-13 based on
    a three-year average.
Two Models
• Elementary & Middle School Model (E/MS)
• High School Model (HS)

*Schools that educate students in both E/MS
 and HS will be assessed using both models
 and receive a combined final grade that will
 incorporate the weighted enrollment from
 each model for the final calculation
Elementary & Middle School Model
• Student Performance on ISTEP+, IMAST, and
  ISTAR, and

• Student Academic Growth on ISTEP+
  – High Growth of the
     • Bottom 25% of students
     • Top 75% of students
  – Low Growth of
     • 100% of students
Elementary & Middle School Model
                 Calculating Grades

• Separate grades are determined for
  English/Language Arts and Math


• A final grade is determined by averaging the
  English/Language Arts and Math grades
Elementary & Middle School Model
   Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade
Excluded in the calculations for performance & growth
  for E/LA are:
• Students that were enrolled for less than 162 days
• Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested
  as LAS Links Level 1 LEP and have NOT been Level 1
  LEP for more than one year, and previously have NOT
  been classified as LAS Links Level 2 or higher.
• Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested
  as LAS Links Level 2 LEP and have NOT been Level 2
  LEP for more than one year.
Elementary & Middle School Model
   Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade
Step 1: Assign a preliminary score based on the percentage
  of students who passed the E/LA ISTEP+, IMAST, or
  ISTAR:
                90.0   – 100.0%   4.00 points
                85.0   – 89.9%    3.50 points
                80.0   – 84.9%    3.00 points
                75.0   – 79.9%    2.50 points
                70.0   – 74.9%    2.00 points
                65.0   – 69.9%    1.50 points
                60.0   – 64.9%    1.00 points
                0.00   – 59.9%    0.00 points
Elementary & Middle School Model
Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade

Step 2: The preliminary score may be raised based
  on high academic growth of students who were
  in the bottom 25% for performance on ISTEP+.

• Raise by one 1.00 points if ≥ 42.5% of the
  bottom 25% showed high growth


      *A school must have a minimum of 10 students in the bottom 25% to be eligible
      for points in this area.
Elementary & Middle School Model
  Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade

Step 3: The preliminary score may be raised based
  on high academic growth of students who were
  in the top 75% for performance on ISTEP+.

• Raise by 1.00 points if ≥ 36.2% of the top 75% of
  students showed high growth



     *A school must have a minimum of 10 students in the top 75% to be eligible for
     points in this area.
Elementary & Middle School Model
   Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade

Step 4: The score may be lowered based on low
  academic growth of 100% of the students on
  ISTEP+.

• Lower by 1.00 points if ≥ 39.8% of 100% of the
  students showed low growth



     *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for possible loss of
     points in this area.
Elementary & Middle School Model
  Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade

Step 5: The score may be lowered if student
  participation is too low on the annual mandatory
  assessments.

• Lower by 1.00 points if < 95.0% of students in
  either subgroup take the ISTEP+, IMAST or ISTAR
  exams.

    *A school must have a minimum of 40 students in the subgroups to be eligible for
    loss of points in this area.
Elementary & Middle School Model
             Calculating a Math Grade
Excluded in the calculations for performance & growth
  in Math are:
• Students that were enrolled for less than 162 days
• Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested
  as LAS Links Level 1 LEP and have NOT been Level 1
  LEP for more than one year, and previously have NOT
  been classified as LAS Links Level 2 or higher.
• Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested
  as LAS Links Level 2 LEP and have NOT been Level 2
  LEP for more than one year.
Elementary & Middle School Model
                Calculating a Math Grade
Step 1: Assign a preliminary score based on the percentage of
   students who passed the Math ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR:

                 90.0   – 100.0%      4.00 points
                 85.0   – 89.9%       3.50 points
                 80.0   – 84.9%       3.00 points
                 75.0   – 79.9%       2.50 points
                 70.0   – 74.9%       2.00 points
                 65.0   – 69.9%       1.50 points
                 60.0   – 64.9%       1.00 points
                 0.00   – 59.9%       0.00 points
Elementary & Middle School Model
                  Calculating a Math Grade

Step 2: The preliminary score may be raised based on
  high academic growth of students who were in the
  bottom 25% for performance on ISTEP+.

• Raise by 1.00 points if ≥ 44.9% of the bottom 25%
  showed high growth



    *A school must have a minimum of 10 students in the bottom 25% to be eligible
    for points in this area.
Elementary & Middle School Model
                  Calculating a Math Grade

Step 3: The score may be raised based on the high
  academic growth of the top 75% of students on
  ISTEP+.

• Raise by one letter grade if ≥ 39.2% of the
  top 75% students showed high growth



    *A school must have a minimum of 10 students in the top 75% to be eligible for
    points in this area.
Elementary & Middle School Model
                   Calculating a Math Grade

Step 4: The score may be lowered based on low
  academic growth of 100% of students on
  ISTEP+.

• Lower by one letter grade if ≥ 42.4% of 100% of
  the students showed low growth



     *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for possible loss of
     points in this area.
Elementary & Middle School Model
                  Calculating a Math Grade

Step 5: The score may be lowered if student
  participation is too low on the annual mandatory
  assessments.

• Lower by 1.00 points if < 95.0% of students in
  either subgroup take the ISTEP+, IMAST or ISTAR
  exams.

    *A school must have a minimum of 40 students in the subgroups to be eligible for
    loss of points in this area.
Elementary & Middle School Model
          Calculating a FINAL Grade

Step 1: Add together the final English/Language
  Arts and Math scores and calculate the
  averaged points received
Elementary & Middle School Model
              Calculating a FINAL Grade
Step 2: Convert the averaged points to a letter grade, using the
   following scale to determine a FINAL Elementary & Middle
   School grade:

               A    =    3.51 - 4.00 points
               B    =    3.00 - 3.50 points
               C    =    2.00 - 2.99 points
               D    =    1.00 - 1.99 points
               F    =    0.00 - 0.99 points
High School Model
• Schools are assessed in 4 areas:
  – English 10 ECA                                           (30%)*
  – Algebra 1 ECA                                            (30%)*
  – Graduation Rate                                          (30%)
  – College & Career Readiness                               (10%)*

• The scores of all assessed areas are weighted
  to determine a final grade.
     *The College & Career Readiness weight shall increase each year at least 5% and its
     increases will be offset by the equivalent decrease spread evenly over the English 10 and
     Algebra I ECAs weights.
High School Model
• English 10 and Algebra 1 ECAs
  – Student Performance
  – Student Improvement
     • 8th grade to 10th grade
     • 10th grade to graduation

• Graduation Rate
  – 4-year rate
  – 5-year rate
High School Model
• College & Career Readiness
  – AP exams
  – IB exams
  – Dual credits
  – Industry certifications


*Scores for each area are capped
  – Maximum = 4.00 points
  – Minimum = 0.00 points
High School Model
        Calculating an English 10 ECA Score
Excluded in the calculations for performance &
  improvement in English 10 ECA are:
• Students that were enrolled for less than 162 days
• Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested
  as LAS Links Level 1 LEP and have NOT been Level 1
  LEP for more than one year, and previously have NOT
  been classified as LAS Links Level 2 or higher.
• Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested
  as LAS Links Level 2 LEP and have NOT been Level 2
  LEP for more than one year.
High School Model
         Calculating an English 10 ECA Score
Step 1: Assign a preliminary score based on the percentage of
   students in the 10th grade cohort who passed the English 10
   ECA or ISTAR:

                 90.0   – 100.0%      4.00 points
                 85.0   – 89.9%       3.50 points
                 80.0   – 84.9%       3.00 points
                 75.0   – 79.9%       2.50 points
                 70.0   – 74.9%       2.00 points
                 65.0   – 69.9%       1.50 points
                 60.0   – 64.9%       1.00 points
                 0.00   – 59.9%       0.00 points
High School Model
           Calculating an English 10 ECA Score
Step 2: The score may be raised or lowered based
  on student improvement from 8th grade ISTEP+,
  IMAST, or ISTAR to English 10 ECA or ISTAR.

• Raise score by 0.50 points if the percentage of students
  from the 10th grade cohort that passed the ECA ≥ 10.3
  percentage points higher than the percentage of the
  same students who passed the E/LA portion of ISTEP+,
  IMAST, or ISTAR in 8th grade.


      *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
High School Model
           Calculating an English 10 ECA Score
Step 2 (cont.): The score may be raised or lowered
  based on student improvement from 8th grade
  ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR to English 10 ECA or ISTAR.

• Lower the score by 0.50 points if the percentage of students
  from the 10th grade cohort that passed the ECA < 0.0
  percentage points lower than the percentage of the same
  students who passed the E/LA portion of the ISTEP+, IMAST
  or ISTAR in 8th grade.

      *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for possible loss of
      points in this area.
High School Model
           Calculating an English 10 ECA Score
Step 3: The new score may be raised based on student
  improvement on the English 10 ECA or ISTAR from
  10th grade to graduation.

• Raise the score by 0.50 points if ≥ 59.3% of students in the
  graduation cohort that did not pass the English 10 ECA or
  ISTAR at the end of 10th grade pass those assessments by the
  time the cohort graduates.


      *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
High School Model
         Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score

• The Algebra I ECA score is calculated in the same
  manner as an English 10 ECA Score, but with
  different targets.
High School Model
        Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score
Excluded in the calculations for performance &
  improvement in Algebra I ECA are:
• Students that were enrolled for less than 162 days
• Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested
  as LAS Links Level 1 LEP and have NOT been Level 1
  LEP for more than one year, and previously have NOT
  been classified as LAS Links Level 2 or higher.
• Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested
  as LAS Links Level 2 LEP and have NOT been Level 2
  LEP for more than one year.
High School Model
           Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score
Step 2: The score may be raised or lowered based
  on student improvement from 8th grade ISTEP+,
  IMAST, or ISTAR to Algebra I ECA or ISTAR.

• Raise the score by 0.50 points if the percentage of
  students from the 10th grade cohort that passed the ECA
  ≥ 17.1 percentage points higher than the percentage of
  the same students who passed the Math portion of
  ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR in 8th grade


     *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
High School Model
            Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score
Step 2 (cont.): The score may be raised or lowered
  based on student improvement from 8th grade
  ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR to Algebra I ECA or ISTAR.

• Lower the score by 0.50 points if the percentage of students
  from the 10th grade cohort that passed the ECA < 0.0
  percentage points lower than the percentage of the same
  students who passed the math portion of the ISTEP+, IMAST
  or ISTAR in 8th grade.

      *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for possible loss of
      points in this area.
High School Model
            Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score

Step 3: The new score may be raised based on student
  improvement on the Algebra I ECA or ISTAR from
  10th grade to graduation.

• Raise the score by 0.50 points if ≥ 62.8% of students in the
  graduation cohort that did not pass the Algebra I ECA or
  ISTAR at the end of 10th grade pass those assessments by the
  time the cohort graduates from high school.

      *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
High School Model
               -Graduation Rate-
        Which Students Are Not Included?

• Up to 3% of students with special needs who are on
  the Certificate of Completion track may be excluded
  from calculations

• The total number of excluded students may not
  exceed 3% of the school’s total graduation cohort
High School Model
         Calculating a Graduation Rate Score

Step 1: Calculate a preliminary score based on the
  percentage of graduates from the graduation cohort:

                            Total # of Graduates in Cohort
                                 Total #         Total #

                            (   Students
                                   in
                                 Cohort
                                            -    Students
                                                 Excluded    )

     *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
High School Model
        Calculating a Graduation Rate Score
Step 2: Assign a preliminary score based on the percentage
  of graduates from the graduation cohort:

                90.0   – 100.0%   4.00 points
                85.0   – 89.9%    3.50 points
                80.0   – 84.9%    3.00 points
                75.0   – 79.9%    2.50 points
                70.0   – 74.9%    2.00 points
                65.0   – 69.9%    1.50 points
                60.0   – 64.9%    1.00 points
                0.00   – 59.9%    0.00 points
High School Model
       Calculating a Graduation Rate Score

Step 3: The score may be raised based on the
  percent of students who received non-waiver
  Honors Diplomas*

• Raise the score by 1.00 points if ≥ 34.4% of four-
  year graduates received a non-waiver Honors
  diploma.*


   *This will not be applied until AY 2014-15. The target number is subject to change.
   A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
High School Model
        Calculating a Graduation Rate Score

Step 4: The score may be lowered based on the percent of
  students who received General and waiver diplomas*

• Lower the score by 1.00 points if ≥ 32.8% of four-year
  graduates receive General and waiver diplomas*



     *This will not be applied until AY 2014-15. The target number is subject to change.
     An Industry Certification target number will also be applied to this subgroup in AY
     2014-15 as a mechanism for a school to not incur the 1.00 penalty. A school must
     have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
High School Model
        Calculating a Graduation Rate Score

Step 5: The score may be raised based on a school’s
  five-year graduation rate

• Raise the score by 1.00 points if at least 13.2% of
  students for the cohort that did not graduate
  within four years do so in five years.



    *This will not be applied until AY 2014-15. The target number is subject to change.
    A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
High School Model
            -College & Career Readiness-
          Which Students Are/Not Included?

• Only graduates from the graduation cohort are
  included in the College and Career Readiness Score.




     *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
High School Model
      Calculating a College & Career Readiness Score

Step 1: Calculate the percentage of graduates from the
  graduation cohort who passed an AP or IB Exam; or
  earned 3 college credits; or earned an industry
  certification:
     # Cohort              # Cohort               # Cohort Grads   # Cohort Grads

 (   Grads who
     Passed an
     AP Exam
                   +       Grads who
                           Passed an IB
                           Exam
                                            +     who Received +
                                                  3 College
                                                  Credits
                                                                   who Received
                                                                   Industry
                                                                   Certification
                                                                                    )
                             Total # Cohort Graduates

           * Each student may count only once in the numerator.
High School Model
     Calculating a College & Career Readiness Score

Step 2: Assign a score based on the percentage of
  graduates from the graduation cohort who
  demonstrated College & Career Readiness:

            25.0 - 100%    =   4.00 points
            18.4 - 24.9%   =   3.00 points
            11.7 - 18.3%   =   2.00 points
            05.0 - 11.6%   =   1.00 points
            00.0 - 04.9%   =   0.00 points
High School Model
                 Calculating a FINAL Grade
Step 1: Once all categories have a final score, find the
  weighted total of the scores.

English 10 ECA:                (score x 0.30)
Algebra I ECA:                 (score x 0.30)
Graduation Rate:               (score x 0.30)
College & Career Readiness     (score x 0.10) +


                                                Total Points
High School Model
             Calculating a Final Grade

Step 2: Convert the score to a letter grade using the
  following scale to determine a FINAL High School
  grade:

             3.51-4.00 points     =   A
             3.00-3.50 points     =   B
             2.00-2.99 points     =   C
             1.00-1.99 points     =   D
             0.00-0.99 points     =   F
Corporation
                 Calculating Grades

• Separate grades are determined for Elementary/
  Middle Schools and High Schools (the same
  methodology is used for the corporation-level as is
  used for the school-level)

• A corporation will receive one FINAL grade by adding
  the final two scores from both models (E/MS + HS)
  together after multiplying those scores by the
  enrollment percentages accordingly.
A-F Accountability

          Questions?

schoolaccountability@doe.in.gov

More Related Content

What's hot

Tip ca-shahbaz saud
Tip ca-shahbaz saudTip ca-shahbaz saud
Tip ca-shahbaz saudShahbaz Saud
 
COUNSELLING ON MATHEMATICS
COUNSELLING ON MATHEMATICSCOUNSELLING ON MATHEMATICS
COUNSELLING ON MATHEMATICSCHARAK RAY
 
Elive15 Discussion TBR Performance Metrics
Elive15 Discussion   TBR  Performance MetricsElive15 Discussion   TBR  Performance Metrics
Elive15 Discussion TBR Performance MetricsThomas Danford
 
Minicucci 2015-2016 Evaluation Report
Minicucci 2015-2016 Evaluation ReportMinicucci 2015-2016 Evaluation Report
Minicucci 2015-2016 Evaluation ReportLaura Minicucci
 
The basics of cbse cce and grading system
The basics of cbse cce and grading systemThe basics of cbse cce and grading system
The basics of cbse cce and grading systemBabu Appat
 
Tip ca-talha rehman
Tip ca-talha rehmanTip ca-talha rehman
Tip ca-talha rehmanTalha Rehman
 
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation 2014-2015
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation 2014-2015Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation 2014-2015
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation 2014-2015Laura Minicucci
 
Hitesh gondalia resume1edu1
Hitesh gondalia resume1edu1Hitesh gondalia resume1edu1
Hitesh gondalia resume1edu1Hitesh Gondalia
 
Assessment Guidelines for K to 12
Assessment Guidelines for K to 12Assessment Guidelines for K to 12
Assessment Guidelines for K to 12Roger Rochar
 
CBSE Special Scheme of Assessment for Board Examination Classes X and XII for...
CBSE Special Scheme of Assessment for Board Examination Classes X and XII for...CBSE Special Scheme of Assessment for Board Examination Classes X and XII for...
CBSE Special Scheme of Assessment for Board Examination Classes X and XII for...Parveen Kumar Sharma
 
Kerala Technological University (KTU)
Kerala Technological University (KTU)Kerala Technological University (KTU)
Kerala Technological University (KTU)Naseel Ibnu Azeez
 

What's hot (17)

Tip ca-shahbaz saud
Tip ca-shahbaz saudTip ca-shahbaz saud
Tip ca-shahbaz saud
 
COUNSELLING ON MATHEMATICS
COUNSELLING ON MATHEMATICSCOUNSELLING ON MATHEMATICS
COUNSELLING ON MATHEMATICS
 
presentation hamza ashraf tmm-01
presentation hamza ashraf tmm-01presentation hamza ashraf tmm-01
presentation hamza ashraf tmm-01
 
Adnan shahbuddin amm 1 a
Adnan shahbuddin amm 1 aAdnan shahbuddin amm 1 a
Adnan shahbuddin amm 1 a
 
Tip ca-talha saeed
Tip ca-talha saeedTip ca-talha saeed
Tip ca-talha saeed
 
Elive15 Discussion TBR Performance Metrics
Elive15 Discussion   TBR  Performance MetricsElive15 Discussion   TBR  Performance Metrics
Elive15 Discussion TBR Performance Metrics
 
Minicucci 2015-2016 Evaluation Report
Minicucci 2015-2016 Evaluation ReportMinicucci 2015-2016 Evaluation Report
Minicucci 2015-2016 Evaluation Report
 
The basics of cbse cce and grading system
The basics of cbse cce and grading systemThe basics of cbse cce and grading system
The basics of cbse cce and grading system
 
Tip ca-talha rehman
Tip ca-talha rehmanTip ca-talha rehman
Tip ca-talha rehman
 
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation 2014-2015
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation 2014-2015Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation 2014-2015
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation 2014-2015
 
Hitesh gondalia resume1edu1
Hitesh gondalia resume1edu1Hitesh gondalia resume1edu1
Hitesh gondalia resume1edu1
 
Mean
MeanMean
Mean
 
Assessment Guidelines for K to 12
Assessment Guidelines for K to 12Assessment Guidelines for K to 12
Assessment Guidelines for K to 12
 
Saira shahid
Saira shahidSaira shahid
Saira shahid
 
CBSE Special Scheme of Assessment for Board Examination Classes X and XII for...
CBSE Special Scheme of Assessment for Board Examination Classes X and XII for...CBSE Special Scheme of Assessment for Board Examination Classes X and XII for...
CBSE Special Scheme of Assessment for Board Examination Classes X and XII for...
 
Kerala Technological University (KTU)
Kerala Technological University (KTU)Kerala Technological University (KTU)
Kerala Technological University (KTU)
 
KTU Academic Regulations 2019
KTU Academic Regulations 2019KTU Academic Regulations 2019
KTU Academic Regulations 2019
 

Viewers also liked

Ses toronto 2010 : Quebec search landscape
Ses toronto 2010 :  Quebec search landscape Ses toronto 2010 :  Quebec search landscape
Ses toronto 2010 : Quebec search landscape iProspect Canada
 
The idea journal 4
The idea journal 4The idea journal 4
The idea journal 4Anthony Chew
 
Superintendent's report Aug 2011
Superintendent's report   Aug 2011Superintendent's report   Aug 2011
Superintendent's report Aug 2011Larry Espe
 
Aida Holgado Y Esther Jimenez 4ºC
Aida Holgado Y Esther Jimenez 4ºCAida Holgado Y Esther Jimenez 4ºC
Aida Holgado Y Esther Jimenez 4ºCedulopez
 

Viewers also liked (8)

About cwi
About cwiAbout cwi
About cwi
 
Ses toronto 2010 : Quebec search landscape
Ses toronto 2010 :  Quebec search landscape Ses toronto 2010 :  Quebec search landscape
Ses toronto 2010 : Quebec search landscape
 
Lumi products overview
Lumi products overviewLumi products overview
Lumi products overview
 
The idea journal 4
The idea journal 4The idea journal 4
The idea journal 4
 
!Prograc10
!Prograc10!Prograc10
!Prograc10
 
Superintendent's report Aug 2011
Superintendent's report   Aug 2011Superintendent's report   Aug 2011
Superintendent's report Aug 2011
 
Aida Holgado Y Esther Jimenez 4ºC
Aida Holgado Y Esther Jimenez 4ºCAida Holgado Y Esther Jimenez 4ºC
Aida Holgado Y Esther Jimenez 4ºC
 
Refguide
RefguideRefguide
Refguide
 

Similar to A f detailed power point for s-boe 11.7.11

Texas State Accountability System 2013
Texas State Accountability System 2013Texas State Accountability System 2013
Texas State Accountability System 2013txprincipalorg
 
State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015txprincipalorg
 
New K-12 Grading System (HS/Elem)
New K-12 Grading System (HS/Elem)New K-12 Grading System (HS/Elem)
New K-12 Grading System (HS/Elem)Manresa School
 
Teacher Rating 2013-2014
Teacher Rating 2013-2014Teacher Rating 2013-2014
Teacher Rating 2013-2014Justin Rook
 
Cc etraining final_cbse_ppt1
Cc etraining final_cbse_ppt1Cc etraining final_cbse_ppt1
Cc etraining final_cbse_ppt1Subhash Jain
 
Catherine Wreyford - Reforms to Primary Assessment and Accountability
Catherine Wreyford - Reforms to Primary Assessment and AccountabilityCatherine Wreyford - Reforms to Primary Assessment and Accountability
Catherine Wreyford - Reforms to Primary Assessment and AccountabilityLamptonLWA
 
Norm reference grading system.ppt
Norm reference grading system.pptNorm reference grading system.ppt
Norm reference grading system.pptCyra Mae Soreda
 
002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILD002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILDStephen Fujii
 
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...National Partnership for Educational Access
 
overviewaccountabilitymetrics_june2014.ppt
overviewaccountabilitymetrics_june2014.pptoverviewaccountabilitymetrics_june2014.ppt
overviewaccountabilitymetrics_june2014.pptMohamedHendawy17
 
Teacher Rating 2012-2013
Teacher Rating 2012-2013Teacher Rating 2012-2013
Teacher Rating 2012-2013Justin Rook
 
MCAS Presentation Nov 27, 2018
MCAS Presentation Nov 27, 2018MCAS Presentation Nov 27, 2018
MCAS Presentation Nov 27, 2018Franklin Matters
 
Golden Triangle Plus 1
Golden Triangle Plus 1Golden Triangle Plus 1
Golden Triangle Plus 1Richard Voltz
 
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 ConventionMSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Conventionmarylandeducators
 
Assessment and Evaluation in education
Assessment and Evaluation in education Assessment and Evaluation in education
Assessment and Evaluation in education umarfarooq915
 
DDN-PPT on Class X board Result.pdf
DDN-PPT on Class X board Result.pdfDDN-PPT on Class X board Result.pdf
DDN-PPT on Class X board Result.pdfPoonamBhardwaj54
 
Idoe dropout recovery accountability framework 11.30.2012
Idoe dropout recovery accountability framework 11.30.2012Idoe dropout recovery accountability framework 11.30.2012
Idoe dropout recovery accountability framework 11.30.2012Blacketor Consultants, LLC
 

Similar to A f detailed power point for s-boe 11.7.11 (20)

Texas State Accountability System 2013
Texas State Accountability System 2013Texas State Accountability System 2013
Texas State Accountability System 2013
 
State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015
 
New K-12 Grading System (HS/Elem)
New K-12 Grading System (HS/Elem)New K-12 Grading System (HS/Elem)
New K-12 Grading System (HS/Elem)
 
New k 12 grading system
New k 12 grading systemNew k 12 grading system
New k 12 grading system
 
NCCE Bylsma
NCCE BylsmaNCCE Bylsma
NCCE Bylsma
 
Teacher Rating 2013-2014
Teacher Rating 2013-2014Teacher Rating 2013-2014
Teacher Rating 2013-2014
 
Cc etraining final_cbse_ppt1
Cc etraining final_cbse_ppt1Cc etraining final_cbse_ppt1
Cc etraining final_cbse_ppt1
 
Catherine Wreyford - Reforms to Primary Assessment and Accountability
Catherine Wreyford - Reforms to Primary Assessment and AccountabilityCatherine Wreyford - Reforms to Primary Assessment and Accountability
Catherine Wreyford - Reforms to Primary Assessment and Accountability
 
Norm reference grading system.ppt
Norm reference grading system.pptNorm reference grading system.ppt
Norm reference grading system.ppt
 
002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILD002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILD
 
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
 
overviewaccountabilitymetrics_june2014.ppt
overviewaccountabilitymetrics_june2014.pptoverviewaccountabilitymetrics_june2014.ppt
overviewaccountabilitymetrics_june2014.ppt
 
All about-the-atar
All about-the-atarAll about-the-atar
All about-the-atar
 
Teacher Rating 2012-2013
Teacher Rating 2012-2013Teacher Rating 2012-2013
Teacher Rating 2012-2013
 
MCAS Presentation Nov 27, 2018
MCAS Presentation Nov 27, 2018MCAS Presentation Nov 27, 2018
MCAS Presentation Nov 27, 2018
 
Golden Triangle Plus 1
Golden Triangle Plus 1Golden Triangle Plus 1
Golden Triangle Plus 1
 
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 ConventionMSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
 
Assessment and Evaluation in education
Assessment and Evaluation in education Assessment and Evaluation in education
Assessment and Evaluation in education
 
DDN-PPT on Class X board Result.pdf
DDN-PPT on Class X board Result.pdfDDN-PPT on Class X board Result.pdf
DDN-PPT on Class X board Result.pdf
 
Idoe dropout recovery accountability framework 11.30.2012
Idoe dropout recovery accountability framework 11.30.2012Idoe dropout recovery accountability framework 11.30.2012
Idoe dropout recovery accountability framework 11.30.2012
 

More from Blacketor Consultants, LLC

2008 09 thru 2013-2014 istep for sbsc - nov 2014
2008 09 thru 2013-2014   istep for sbsc - nov 20142008 09 thru 2013-2014   istep for sbsc - nov 2014
2008 09 thru 2013-2014 istep for sbsc - nov 2014Blacketor Consultants, LLC
 
Virtual Learning Policy Consideration (iNacol)
Virtual Learning Policy Consideration (iNacol)Virtual Learning Policy Consideration (iNacol)
Virtual Learning Policy Consideration (iNacol)Blacketor Consultants, LLC
 
INdiana Department of Education May 2012 Elsener overview / baseline for com...
INdiana Department of Education  May 2012 Elsener overview / baseline for com...INdiana Department of Education  May 2012 Elsener overview / baseline for com...
INdiana Department of Education May 2012 Elsener overview / baseline for com...Blacketor Consultants, LLC
 
Indiana Department of Education 2012 review (Bennett) / baseline for comparison
Indiana Department of Education 2012 review (Bennett) / baseline for comparisonIndiana Department of Education 2012 review (Bennett) / baseline for comparison
Indiana Department of Education 2012 review (Bennett) / baseline for comparisonBlacketor Consultants, LLC
 
Powerpointfromwebex3inverventionselection801612
Powerpointfromwebex3inverventionselection801612Powerpointfromwebex3inverventionselection801612
Powerpointfromwebex3inverventionselection801612Blacketor Consultants, LLC
 

More from Blacketor Consultants, LLC (20)

Change.org (opioids)
Change.org (opioids)Change.org (opioids)
Change.org (opioids)
 
2014 vs 2015 testing time
2014 vs 2015 testing time2014 vs 2015 testing time
2014 vs 2015 testing time
 
Pence executiveorder 2 2015
Pence executiveorder 2 2015Pence executiveorder 2 2015
Pence executiveorder 2 2015
 
Us doe-education-2015-update
Us doe-education-2015-updateUs doe-education-2015-update
Us doe-education-2015-update
 
Chalk beathandout final
Chalk beathandout finalChalk beathandout final
Chalk beathandout final
 
2008 09 thru 2013-2014 istep for sbsc - nov 2014
2008 09 thru 2013-2014   istep for sbsc - nov 20142008 09 thru 2013-2014   istep for sbsc - nov 2014
2008 09 thru 2013-2014 istep for sbsc - nov 2014
 
Virtual Learning Policy Consideration (iNacol)
Virtual Learning Policy Consideration (iNacol)Virtual Learning Policy Consideration (iNacol)
Virtual Learning Policy Consideration (iNacol)
 
Choice special savings distribution
Choice special savings distributionChoice special savings distribution
Choice special savings distribution
 
Waiver response from CECI
Waiver response from CECIWaiver response from CECI
Waiver response from CECI
 
Waiver IDOE response
Waiver IDOE responseWaiver IDOE response
Waiver IDOE response
 
INdiana Department of Education May 2012 Elsener overview / baseline for com...
INdiana Department of Education  May 2012 Elsener overview / baseline for com...INdiana Department of Education  May 2012 Elsener overview / baseline for com...
INdiana Department of Education May 2012 Elsener overview / baseline for com...
 
Indiana Department of Education 2012 review (Bennett) / baseline for comparison
Indiana Department of Education 2012 review (Bennett) / baseline for comparisonIndiana Department of Education 2012 review (Bennett) / baseline for comparison
Indiana Department of Education 2012 review (Bennett) / baseline for comparison
 
Indiana Open door law handbook
Indiana Open door law handbookIndiana Open door law handbook
Indiana Open door law handbook
 
Common core standards 2010
Common core standards 2010Common core standards 2010
Common core standards 2010
 
Glenda& IDOE board clash over waiver
Glenda& IDOE board clash over waiverGlenda& IDOE board clash over waiver
Glenda& IDOE board clash over waiver
 
Powerpointfromwebex3inverventionselection801612
Powerpointfromwebex3inverventionselection801612Powerpointfromwebex3inverventionselection801612
Powerpointfromwebex3inverventionselection801612
 
Powerpointfromintrotoflexibilitywaiver
PowerpointfromintrotoflexibilitywaiverPowerpointfromintrotoflexibilitywaiver
Powerpointfromintrotoflexibilitywaiver
 
2008 efficiency and effectiveness rankings
2008 efficiency and effectiveness rankings2008 efficiency and effectiveness rankings
2008 efficiency and effectiveness rankings
 
02 pac presentation by luke britt
02 pac presentation by luke britt02 pac presentation by luke britt
02 pac presentation by luke britt
 
03 nasbe presentation by kris amundson
03 nasbe presentation by kris amundson03 nasbe presentation by kris amundson
03 nasbe presentation by kris amundson
 

A f detailed power point for s-boe 11.7.11

  • 1. A-F Accountability Improving Transparency & Student Success November 7, 2011
  • 2. The new A–F model The information in this presentation reflects the proposed rule approved by the Indiana State Board of Education on 11.7.11 and is subject to change.
  • 3. The new A–F model • Simplifies designations awarded to schools • Incorporates Indiana Growth Model into accountability (elementary & middle schools) – Focuses on closing achievement gaps – Focuses on all students, not just the “bubble kids” • Recognizes 4- and 5-year graduation rates (high schools) • Includes College & Career Readiness as a measure of school success (high schools)
  • 4. Which Schools are Assessed? • Public schools (Traditional & Charter) • Accredited non-public schools • Nonpublic schools accredited by an entity recognized by the Indiana State Board of Education that participate in the voucher system
  • 5. Growth & Improvement Targets • Preliminary scores may be raised or lowered based on schools meeting set targets • Targets are based on the three-year average growth or improvement of the top or bottom quartile of schools* *For AY 2011-12 the ECA targets are based on a two-year average and will be updated for AY 2012-13 based on a three-year average.
  • 6. Two Models • Elementary & Middle School Model (E/MS) • High School Model (HS) *Schools that educate students in both E/MS and HS will be assessed using both models and receive a combined final grade that will incorporate the weighted enrollment from each model for the final calculation
  • 7. Elementary & Middle School Model • Student Performance on ISTEP+, IMAST, and ISTAR, and • Student Academic Growth on ISTEP+ – High Growth of the • Bottom 25% of students • Top 75% of students – Low Growth of • 100% of students
  • 8. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating Grades • Separate grades are determined for English/Language Arts and Math • A final grade is determined by averaging the English/Language Arts and Math grades
  • 9. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade Excluded in the calculations for performance & growth for E/LA are: • Students that were enrolled for less than 162 days • Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested as LAS Links Level 1 LEP and have NOT been Level 1 LEP for more than one year, and previously have NOT been classified as LAS Links Level 2 or higher. • Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested as LAS Links Level 2 LEP and have NOT been Level 2 LEP for more than one year.
  • 10. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade Step 1: Assign a preliminary score based on the percentage of students who passed the E/LA ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR: 90.0 – 100.0% 4.00 points 85.0 – 89.9% 3.50 points 80.0 – 84.9% 3.00 points 75.0 – 79.9% 2.50 points 70.0 – 74.9% 2.00 points 65.0 – 69.9% 1.50 points 60.0 – 64.9% 1.00 points 0.00 – 59.9% 0.00 points
  • 11. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade Step 2: The preliminary score may be raised based on high academic growth of students who were in the bottom 25% for performance on ISTEP+. • Raise by one 1.00 points if ≥ 42.5% of the bottom 25% showed high growth *A school must have a minimum of 10 students in the bottom 25% to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 12. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade Step 3: The preliminary score may be raised based on high academic growth of students who were in the top 75% for performance on ISTEP+. • Raise by 1.00 points if ≥ 36.2% of the top 75% of students showed high growth *A school must have a minimum of 10 students in the top 75% to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 13. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade Step 4: The score may be lowered based on low academic growth of 100% of the students on ISTEP+. • Lower by 1.00 points if ≥ 39.8% of 100% of the students showed low growth *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for possible loss of points in this area.
  • 14. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating an English/Language Arts Grade Step 5: The score may be lowered if student participation is too low on the annual mandatory assessments. • Lower by 1.00 points if < 95.0% of students in either subgroup take the ISTEP+, IMAST or ISTAR exams. *A school must have a minimum of 40 students in the subgroups to be eligible for loss of points in this area.
  • 15. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating a Math Grade Excluded in the calculations for performance & growth in Math are: • Students that were enrolled for less than 162 days • Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested as LAS Links Level 1 LEP and have NOT been Level 1 LEP for more than one year, and previously have NOT been classified as LAS Links Level 2 or higher. • Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested as LAS Links Level 2 LEP and have NOT been Level 2 LEP for more than one year.
  • 16. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating a Math Grade Step 1: Assign a preliminary score based on the percentage of students who passed the Math ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR: 90.0 – 100.0% 4.00 points 85.0 – 89.9% 3.50 points 80.0 – 84.9% 3.00 points 75.0 – 79.9% 2.50 points 70.0 – 74.9% 2.00 points 65.0 – 69.9% 1.50 points 60.0 – 64.9% 1.00 points 0.00 – 59.9% 0.00 points
  • 17. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating a Math Grade Step 2: The preliminary score may be raised based on high academic growth of students who were in the bottom 25% for performance on ISTEP+. • Raise by 1.00 points if ≥ 44.9% of the bottom 25% showed high growth *A school must have a minimum of 10 students in the bottom 25% to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 18. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating a Math Grade Step 3: The score may be raised based on the high academic growth of the top 75% of students on ISTEP+. • Raise by one letter grade if ≥ 39.2% of the top 75% students showed high growth *A school must have a minimum of 10 students in the top 75% to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 19. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating a Math Grade Step 4: The score may be lowered based on low academic growth of 100% of students on ISTEP+. • Lower by one letter grade if ≥ 42.4% of 100% of the students showed low growth *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for possible loss of points in this area.
  • 20. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating a Math Grade Step 5: The score may be lowered if student participation is too low on the annual mandatory assessments. • Lower by 1.00 points if < 95.0% of students in either subgroup take the ISTEP+, IMAST or ISTAR exams. *A school must have a minimum of 40 students in the subgroups to be eligible for loss of points in this area.
  • 21. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating a FINAL Grade Step 1: Add together the final English/Language Arts and Math scores and calculate the averaged points received
  • 22. Elementary & Middle School Model Calculating a FINAL Grade Step 2: Convert the averaged points to a letter grade, using the following scale to determine a FINAL Elementary & Middle School grade: A = 3.51 - 4.00 points B = 3.00 - 3.50 points C = 2.00 - 2.99 points D = 1.00 - 1.99 points F = 0.00 - 0.99 points
  • 23. High School Model • Schools are assessed in 4 areas: – English 10 ECA (30%)* – Algebra 1 ECA (30%)* – Graduation Rate (30%) – College & Career Readiness (10%)* • The scores of all assessed areas are weighted to determine a final grade. *The College & Career Readiness weight shall increase each year at least 5% and its increases will be offset by the equivalent decrease spread evenly over the English 10 and Algebra I ECAs weights.
  • 24. High School Model • English 10 and Algebra 1 ECAs – Student Performance – Student Improvement • 8th grade to 10th grade • 10th grade to graduation • Graduation Rate – 4-year rate – 5-year rate
  • 25. High School Model • College & Career Readiness – AP exams – IB exams – Dual credits – Industry certifications *Scores for each area are capped – Maximum = 4.00 points – Minimum = 0.00 points
  • 26. High School Model Calculating an English 10 ECA Score Excluded in the calculations for performance & improvement in English 10 ECA are: • Students that were enrolled for less than 162 days • Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested as LAS Links Level 1 LEP and have NOT been Level 1 LEP for more than one year, and previously have NOT been classified as LAS Links Level 2 or higher. • Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested as LAS Links Level 2 LEP and have NOT been Level 2 LEP for more than one year.
  • 27. High School Model Calculating an English 10 ECA Score Step 1: Assign a preliminary score based on the percentage of students in the 10th grade cohort who passed the English 10 ECA or ISTAR: 90.0 – 100.0% 4.00 points 85.0 – 89.9% 3.50 points 80.0 – 84.9% 3.00 points 75.0 – 79.9% 2.50 points 70.0 – 74.9% 2.00 points 65.0 – 69.9% 1.50 points 60.0 – 64.9% 1.00 points 0.00 – 59.9% 0.00 points
  • 28. High School Model Calculating an English 10 ECA Score Step 2: The score may be raised or lowered based on student improvement from 8th grade ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR to English 10 ECA or ISTAR. • Raise score by 0.50 points if the percentage of students from the 10th grade cohort that passed the ECA ≥ 10.3 percentage points higher than the percentage of the same students who passed the E/LA portion of ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR in 8th grade. *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 29. High School Model Calculating an English 10 ECA Score Step 2 (cont.): The score may be raised or lowered based on student improvement from 8th grade ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR to English 10 ECA or ISTAR. • Lower the score by 0.50 points if the percentage of students from the 10th grade cohort that passed the ECA < 0.0 percentage points lower than the percentage of the same students who passed the E/LA portion of the ISTEP+, IMAST or ISTAR in 8th grade. *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for possible loss of points in this area.
  • 30. High School Model Calculating an English 10 ECA Score Step 3: The new score may be raised based on student improvement on the English 10 ECA or ISTAR from 10th grade to graduation. • Raise the score by 0.50 points if ≥ 59.3% of students in the graduation cohort that did not pass the English 10 ECA or ISTAR at the end of 10th grade pass those assessments by the time the cohort graduates. *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 31. High School Model Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score • The Algebra I ECA score is calculated in the same manner as an English 10 ECA Score, but with different targets.
  • 32. High School Model Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score Excluded in the calculations for performance & improvement in Algebra I ECA are: • Students that were enrolled for less than 162 days • Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested as LAS Links Level 1 LEP and have NOT been Level 1 LEP for more than one year, and previously have NOT been classified as LAS Links Level 2 or higher. • Students who are Limited English Proficient, tested as LAS Links Level 2 LEP and have NOT been Level 2 LEP for more than one year.
  • 33. High School Model Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score Step 2: The score may be raised or lowered based on student improvement from 8th grade ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR to Algebra I ECA or ISTAR. • Raise the score by 0.50 points if the percentage of students from the 10th grade cohort that passed the ECA ≥ 17.1 percentage points higher than the percentage of the same students who passed the Math portion of ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR in 8th grade *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 34. High School Model Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score Step 2 (cont.): The score may be raised or lowered based on student improvement from 8th grade ISTEP+, IMAST, or ISTAR to Algebra I ECA or ISTAR. • Lower the score by 0.50 points if the percentage of students from the 10th grade cohort that passed the ECA < 0.0 percentage points lower than the percentage of the same students who passed the math portion of the ISTEP+, IMAST or ISTAR in 8th grade. *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for possible loss of points in this area.
  • 35. High School Model Calculating an Algebra I ECA Score Step 3: The new score may be raised based on student improvement on the Algebra I ECA or ISTAR from 10th grade to graduation. • Raise the score by 0.50 points if ≥ 62.8% of students in the graduation cohort that did not pass the Algebra I ECA or ISTAR at the end of 10th grade pass those assessments by the time the cohort graduates from high school. *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 36. High School Model -Graduation Rate- Which Students Are Not Included? • Up to 3% of students with special needs who are on the Certificate of Completion track may be excluded from calculations • The total number of excluded students may not exceed 3% of the school’s total graduation cohort
  • 37. High School Model Calculating a Graduation Rate Score Step 1: Calculate a preliminary score based on the percentage of graduates from the graduation cohort: Total # of Graduates in Cohort Total # Total # ( Students in Cohort - Students Excluded ) *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 38. High School Model Calculating a Graduation Rate Score Step 2: Assign a preliminary score based on the percentage of graduates from the graduation cohort: 90.0 – 100.0% 4.00 points 85.0 – 89.9% 3.50 points 80.0 – 84.9% 3.00 points 75.0 – 79.9% 2.50 points 70.0 – 74.9% 2.00 points 65.0 – 69.9% 1.50 points 60.0 – 64.9% 1.00 points 0.00 – 59.9% 0.00 points
  • 39. High School Model Calculating a Graduation Rate Score Step 3: The score may be raised based on the percent of students who received non-waiver Honors Diplomas* • Raise the score by 1.00 points if ≥ 34.4% of four- year graduates received a non-waiver Honors diploma.* *This will not be applied until AY 2014-15. The target number is subject to change. A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 40. High School Model Calculating a Graduation Rate Score Step 4: The score may be lowered based on the percent of students who received General and waiver diplomas* • Lower the score by 1.00 points if ≥ 32.8% of four-year graduates receive General and waiver diplomas* *This will not be applied until AY 2014-15. The target number is subject to change. An Industry Certification target number will also be applied to this subgroup in AY 2014-15 as a mechanism for a school to not incur the 1.00 penalty. A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 41. High School Model Calculating a Graduation Rate Score Step 5: The score may be raised based on a school’s five-year graduation rate • Raise the score by 1.00 points if at least 13.2% of students for the cohort that did not graduate within four years do so in five years. *This will not be applied until AY 2014-15. The target number is subject to change. A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 42. High School Model -College & Career Readiness- Which Students Are/Not Included? • Only graduates from the graduation cohort are included in the College and Career Readiness Score. *A school must have a minimum of 10 students to be eligible for points in this area.
  • 43. High School Model Calculating a College & Career Readiness Score Step 1: Calculate the percentage of graduates from the graduation cohort who passed an AP or IB Exam; or earned 3 college credits; or earned an industry certification: # Cohort # Cohort # Cohort Grads # Cohort Grads ( Grads who Passed an AP Exam + Grads who Passed an IB Exam + who Received + 3 College Credits who Received Industry Certification ) Total # Cohort Graduates * Each student may count only once in the numerator.
  • 44. High School Model Calculating a College & Career Readiness Score Step 2: Assign a score based on the percentage of graduates from the graduation cohort who demonstrated College & Career Readiness: 25.0 - 100% = 4.00 points 18.4 - 24.9% = 3.00 points 11.7 - 18.3% = 2.00 points 05.0 - 11.6% = 1.00 points 00.0 - 04.9% = 0.00 points
  • 45. High School Model Calculating a FINAL Grade Step 1: Once all categories have a final score, find the weighted total of the scores. English 10 ECA: (score x 0.30) Algebra I ECA: (score x 0.30) Graduation Rate: (score x 0.30) College & Career Readiness (score x 0.10) + Total Points
  • 46. High School Model Calculating a Final Grade Step 2: Convert the score to a letter grade using the following scale to determine a FINAL High School grade: 3.51-4.00 points = A 3.00-3.50 points = B 2.00-2.99 points = C 1.00-1.99 points = D 0.00-0.99 points = F
  • 47. Corporation Calculating Grades • Separate grades are determined for Elementary/ Middle Schools and High Schools (the same methodology is used for the corporation-level as is used for the school-level) • A corporation will receive one FINAL grade by adding the final two scores from both models (E/MS + HS) together after multiplying those scores by the enrollment percentages accordingly.
  • 48. A-F Accountability Questions? schoolaccountability@doe.in.gov