This document outlines the marking criteria for an assignment on an ethical case review. It will be marked based on an ethical review using principles from a learning module, a discussion of teamwork strategies for health contexts and their relevance to the case. Additional criteria include clear definition and explanation of concepts, evidence of research, logical analysis and discussion integrating literature, and appropriate formatting and referencing. Deductions may be applied for issues relating to presentation, word count, or referencing errors. The maximum mark is 30 points.

1. HSNS 366 Assignment 1 Part B Marking Criteria-Ethical Case Review
Marking criteria Achievement level Mark
Ethical review
 Completionof SmartSparrowlearningmodule and Conductsa
comprehensive reviewof principles
 Discussesrelevantethical principles andAppliesprinciples
appropriately tothe ethical case
SS 2.5/2.5
8/10
Teamwork
 Identifiesrelevantfactorsandprocessesforsuccessful teamwork
 Discussesstrategiesthatcan be usedinhealthcontexts and
Relates/recommends strategiesforthe ethical case 8/10
Content
 Clearidentification,definitionandexplanation of central concepts
 Evidence of focusedreadingandresearchtolocate anddevelop
knowledge of keytopicareas
Analysis
 Logical developmentandapplicationof ideastothe topic
 Reviewof currentandrelevantliterature tosupportthoughtsand
ideas
 Thoughtful analysisanddiscussionintegratinginformationfromthe
evidence-basedliteratureandsynthesizingresponsestokeytopic
area
8/10
Provisional mark /30
DEDUCTIONS are appliedfor the following:
 Inappropriate presentation,grammar,punctuation, spellingand
referencing
 Minimal or extended wordlimit(maximum10% leeway)
 Poorformattingand/orpresentation
 Failure tocheck/editspelling,grammarandpunctuationerrors
 Incorrect/incompletereferencing
Final mark 24/30
Assessedby:
Comments: