This document summarizes a study investigating barriers and facilitators to scaling up assistive health innovations for people living with dementia. The study uses a social innovation approach called the Dutch Ecosystem Dementia Care (EDC), which brings together over 100 stakeholders from healthcare, companies, knowledge institutes, government, and people with dementia. Preliminary results from focus groups and interviews found that collaboration between stakeholders is essential for scaling up innovations but is challenged by differing expectations and responsibilities. Barriers also exist in the development and adoption of technologies. Recommendations include facilitating practical collaboration between clients, healthcare professionals, and manufacturers through co-creation and a shared vision.
The purpose of this project is to use foresight practices to describe the process for creating a potential future of personalized healthcare for the year 2045 and explain how strategic innovation can be applied to a personalized healthcare company in 2019.
Abstract:
Currently, there is a convergence of three key factors in the global landscape that creates an opportunity for the research community to make fundamental contributions to improving the quality of life of every single citizen. Conversely, failure to recognize and act on this phenomenon may have disastrous effects on multiple levels. The first factor is the unprecedented focus and willingness to invest in the healthcare industry. The second factor is the fact that the prime directive of the healthcare sector, i.e. nothing interferes with the delivery of care, has ramifications on every aspect of information technology used in this domain. The final factor is the recognition that patient empowerment and buy-in will be critical for the advance of health information technology. These factors highlight the fact that there are inherent assumptions in the existing access models that render them ineffective and not applicable for long term use in the healthcare field.
This talk will highlight all these issues and challenge the research community to delve more the industry-specific constraints that require further innovation in the space; possibly necessitating a re-examination of the core assumptions in the field.
Bio:
Tyrone Grandison is currently the Program Manager for Core Healthcare Services in the Healthcare Transformation group of the IBM Services Research organization (Hawthorne, New York). His immediate interests are in developing innovative solutions for ensuring patient privacy protection and for integrating information from multiple sources to get more complete views of patients to enable better decision making. Prior to this, Tyrone led the Intelligent Information Systems (Quest) team in the Computer Science department at the IBM Almaden Research Center (San Jose, California). The team pioneered research in Relational Database Privacy, Disclosure-Compliant Query Processing for RFID and Mobile Data Networks, Security Exception Handling in Healthcare Information Systems and Large Scale Text Analysis of Online Data. Tyrone is a Distinguished Engineer of the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM), Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and has been further recognized by the IEEE (2010 Technical Achievement Award), the National Society of Black Engineers (i.e. Pioneer of the Year 2009) and the Black Engineer of the Year Award Board (i.e. Modern Day Technology Leader 2009, Minority in Science Trailblazer 2010). Tyrone received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees from the University of the West Indies, Jamaica in 1997 and 1998, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree from the Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine in the United Kingdom.
Presented: June 9, 2010
Presentation given by Josep Maria Tormos from Guttmann Neurorehabilitation Hospital in the framework of the Emergence Forum Barcelona
Biocat organized the Barcelona Emergence Forum (April 10-11th, 2014, Congress Palace, Montjuïc) supported by the TRANSBIO SUDOE, a translational cooperation project dedicated to innovation in life sciences in South-West Europe. The Barcelona Emergence Forum contributed to bringing together Academics, Companies, Investment Entities, Technology Platforms and Technology Transfer Offices from Spain, France and Portugal to set up collaborative projects on Human Health & Agro-food Innovation.
More information at: http://www.b2match.eu/emergenceforum2014
The purpose of this project is to use foresight practices to describe the process for creating a potential future of personalized healthcare for the year 2045 and explain how strategic innovation can be applied to a personalized healthcare company in 2019.
Abstract:
Currently, there is a convergence of three key factors in the global landscape that creates an opportunity for the research community to make fundamental contributions to improving the quality of life of every single citizen. Conversely, failure to recognize and act on this phenomenon may have disastrous effects on multiple levels. The first factor is the unprecedented focus and willingness to invest in the healthcare industry. The second factor is the fact that the prime directive of the healthcare sector, i.e. nothing interferes with the delivery of care, has ramifications on every aspect of information technology used in this domain. The final factor is the recognition that patient empowerment and buy-in will be critical for the advance of health information technology. These factors highlight the fact that there are inherent assumptions in the existing access models that render them ineffective and not applicable for long term use in the healthcare field.
This talk will highlight all these issues and challenge the research community to delve more the industry-specific constraints that require further innovation in the space; possibly necessitating a re-examination of the core assumptions in the field.
Bio:
Tyrone Grandison is currently the Program Manager for Core Healthcare Services in the Healthcare Transformation group of the IBM Services Research organization (Hawthorne, New York). His immediate interests are in developing innovative solutions for ensuring patient privacy protection and for integrating information from multiple sources to get more complete views of patients to enable better decision making. Prior to this, Tyrone led the Intelligent Information Systems (Quest) team in the Computer Science department at the IBM Almaden Research Center (San Jose, California). The team pioneered research in Relational Database Privacy, Disclosure-Compliant Query Processing for RFID and Mobile Data Networks, Security Exception Handling in Healthcare Information Systems and Large Scale Text Analysis of Online Data. Tyrone is a Distinguished Engineer of the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM), Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and has been further recognized by the IEEE (2010 Technical Achievement Award), the National Society of Black Engineers (i.e. Pioneer of the Year 2009) and the Black Engineer of the Year Award Board (i.e. Modern Day Technology Leader 2009, Minority in Science Trailblazer 2010). Tyrone received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees from the University of the West Indies, Jamaica in 1997 and 1998, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree from the Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine in the United Kingdom.
Presented: June 9, 2010
Presentation given by Josep Maria Tormos from Guttmann Neurorehabilitation Hospital in the framework of the Emergence Forum Barcelona
Biocat organized the Barcelona Emergence Forum (April 10-11th, 2014, Congress Palace, Montjuïc) supported by the TRANSBIO SUDOE, a translational cooperation project dedicated to innovation in life sciences in South-West Europe. The Barcelona Emergence Forum contributed to bringing together Academics, Companies, Investment Entities, Technology Platforms and Technology Transfer Offices from Spain, France and Portugal to set up collaborative projects on Human Health & Agro-food Innovation.
More information at: http://www.b2match.eu/emergenceforum2014
Karen Day, University of Auckland
Koray Atalag, University of Auckland
Denise Irvine, e3health
Bryan Houliston, Auckland University of Technology
(4/11/10, Illott, 1.45)
Future of Healthcare Provision Jan 2017Future Agenda
Building on insights from our 2015 future of health discussions, this is a new initial view on how healthcare provision may change, especially given emerging opportunities for improved patient engagement. As well as insights from discussions in India, UK, Canada, Singapore and the US it also includes other additional perspectives shared in interviews and workshops over the past 12 months.
We recognise that given the multi-factored nature of this topic and the rapid emergence of new options, what we have summarised in this document is itself in flux. As such, over the next few months we will be sharing this more widely for additional feedback ahead of publication of an updated paper over the summer. So, if you have any comments on changes and additions or issues that you think need more detail, please let us know and we will include.
As with all Future Agenda output, this is being published under creative commons (share alike non commercial) so you are free to share and quote as suits.
Reflection paper NO PLAGIARISM TIMES NEW ROMAN FONT. DO NOT U.docxlillie234567
Reflection paper: NO PLAGIARISM / TIMES NEW ROMAN FONT. / DO NOT USE CITATIONS EXCEPT FOR THE VIDEO.
For this assignment, you will take some time to reflect on what you know, what you are learning, and what you still want/need to learn in relation to this course. Opportunities to reflect on our profession’s learning competencies, practice behaviors, and methods for how to be an effective social worker are important moments in our development as lifelong learners. To complete this assignment, you will reflect on the assigned readings, classroom discussions, activities, and assignments.
INSTRUCTIONS:IT SHOULD BE REFLECTIVE WRITING. Please divide your paper up by competency. Each competency should be a new paragraph (1 paragraph for competency) that includes all of the information below:
EACH PARAGRAPH MUST CONTAIN THE INFORMATION BELOW:
1.
Describe the assignment/activity you engaged in. Describe the purpose of this assignment/activity. What did you do?
2.
Briefly describe the competency you are linking the assignment/activity to. Provide a brief synopsis of the competency in your own words.
3.
Describe how the assignment/activity helped you obtain certain knowledge and skills for each competency covered. how the assignment/activity helped you in the process of mastering the competency? How did this assignment/activity help you in learning the skill and/or obtaining the knowledge that the competency discusses?
4.
What do you still want and/or need to know in order to master the competency? This can be briefly summarized in a short conclusion paragraph at the end of your paper, or briefly discussed throughout the paper under each competency.
Core Competencies:
CC 1 – Demonstrate Ethical & Professional Behavior: I did a Response Paper on the Day It Snowed in Miami.
CC2 – Advance human rights and social, racial, economic, and environmental justice: I did a Response Paper on the 13th Film (13th Amendment).
CC3 – Engage Anti-racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ADEI) in Practice: I did a Social Justice & Action Project on the Women's Rights Movement.
CC4 – Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research: We talk in class about the TEDMED of Nadine Burke Harris regarding How childhood trauma affects health across a lifetime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95ovIJ3dsNk
CC5 – Engage in Policy Practice: I did a Policy Research Paper on Student Loans Forgiveness.
CC6 – Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities: I learn how to do an action plan and I created one Action Plan with goals and objectives for someone on how to work on anger management and how to find a job.
CC7 – Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities: I did an Individual & Family Assessment Paper on the movie (Precious) the principal actor.
Self Compassion Paper
Paper
Best Buy Co. Inc. Essay
Conflict Theory Paper
Elastic Paper
Paper
Paper
Product Pricing Essay
Chevy Volt Research Paper
The Future Of Best Buy
Bitcoin Essay
Social Mobilization & Risk Communication in Emergency Response: A Discuss of ...Abraham Idokoko
A seminar presentation to public health experts in the Department of Community Health & Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idiaraba, Nigeria on Thursday, 21st May, 2015.
Digital Health a call for Government Leadership and cooperation between ICT a...
20150321 Full Paper design4health_FINAL
1. Scaling up health innovations for people living with
dementia; A social innovation approach
Liselore Snaphaan1,2
, Ellen Verhaegh 1,3
, Eveline Wouters3
, Lena van Gastel4
,
Inge Bongers 1,2
1
Tilburg University, TRANZO, The Netherlands
2
Mental Health care institute, Eindhoven (GGzE), Innovate Dementia, The Netherlands
3
Fontys University, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
4
Midpoint, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Abstract
Context: For the upcoming 35 years a sharp increase of people with dementia is expected worldwide
(WHO, 2012). ‘Ageing in place’ will be stimulated to overcome this large socio-economical threat. The
use of assistive innovations in home situations seems promising (Nijhof, 2009). These innovations
however, still do not reach a large population (Oirschot ,2010). Scaling up innovations in public sectors
meets more challenges in comparison with private sectors (Micheli, 2012, Glasgow, 2012). This study
investigates the open collaboration between various stakeholders who influence the purchase and use
of technology for people with dementia in a home situation. From this social innovation approach,
barriers and facilitators of the scaling-up of technology have been explored.
Method: An Ecosystem research model for Dementia Care was used (EDC). The EDC structure consists
of 13 representatives of companies, knowledge institutes, healthcare organisations and governmental
bodies, to investigate the different perspectives of scaling up. Focus group meetings and supplementary
semi-structured interviews with respondents of the named stakeholder groups and people who are
living with dementia were performed.
Results: From June 2014 until now, the EDC has grown to almost 100 participants, who were aligned
with healthcare organizations (n=5), companies/care insurance (n=17), knowledge institutes (n=6),
governmental bodies (n=4) and people living with dementia (n=20). Preliminary results show that
collaboration between the stakeholders is essential to make scaling-up possible, but different
expectations and assumed responsibilities dominate.
Conclusions: During a half year time, over 40 stakeholders are collaborating in a social innovation
approach to make scaling-up of assistive innovation in the dementia care possible in the near future. To
make this collaboration effective, it seems that individual stakeholder groups need a linking pin
between each other. By the use of an EDC, this connection could be made by adjusting the
communication through shared knowledge, shared savings and shared values, which is expected to
have benefits for the scaling-up of assistive innovations.
Keywords: Dementia, social innovation, open network, ecosystem, collaboration, scale-up
2. Introduction
Worldwide, approximately 44.4 million persons are living with dementia. This number will increase
to 135.5 million in 2050 (WHO, 2012). Ageing in place will be stimulated by governments to
overcome this large socio-economical threat and is also preferred by the people who are living with
dementia themselves (Jonker et al., 2009; Van der Leeuw, 2007; Zantinge, 2011). Family care (often
partner and/or children), plays an important role in making ageing in place possible. Providing care
in a home setting is not always easy, and is for many informal caregivers a burden, especially in the
case of intensive care during a long time (Zwaanswijk, 2010). Therefore, adequate, early assistance
for people living with dementia is needed. The use of assistive innovations in home situations seems
promising to support ageing in place. The approach is supporting Activities of Daily Living and thus
eases the burden of family care (Nijhof, 2009). However, many of these innovations still do not
reach a large number of people (Oirschot, 2010). Scaling up innovations in public sectors has more
challenges compared to private sectors, due to hierarchic structures, resistance to change, and risk
avoidance which hinders the adoption process of potential users (Micheli et al., 2012). Collaboration
between private and public sectors with all stakeholders involved seems conducive to scaling up
(Glasgow et al., 2012; Micheli et al., 2012). Therefore, a national Ecosystem of Dementia Care (EDC)
in The Netherlands has been formed. One of the main foci is scaling up innovations in the public
health sector. EDC is a pragmatic , open, social innovation network where healthcare organisations,
knowledge institutes, companies, governmental bodies and people living with dementia
collaborate to make innovations accessible for people living with dementia at home. It investigates
who and what influences the purchase and use of technology for people living with dementia at
home from different stakeholder perspectives, while all these stakeholders influence these
processes of purchasing and using technology. From this social innovation approach, barriers and
facilitators of the scaling-up of technology were explored. Simultaneously, this network is used to
overcome the barriers discovered; thus the obtained solutions will directly be implemented into
daily practice.
Method: Dutch Ecosystem Dementia Care
The pragmatic open network where research and practice are merged is still growing. From June
2014 until now, the EDC has grown to almost 100 participators, who were aligned with healthcare
organizations (n=5), companies/care insurance (n=17), knowledge institutes (n=6), governmental
bodies (n=4) and people living with dementia (n=20). Monthly, 13 representatives of these
quadruple helix participators collaborate to build a network which investigates the different
perspectives of scaling up and overcome the found barriers. Based on experienced difficulties by
people living with dementia at home , 11 different domains were described by the dutch
psychogeriatrician association 2014. From these 11 domains four themes were chosen by a panel of
experts from EDC, to actively explore. These four themes were:
3. 1. Dementia friendly communities
2. Stimulating physical activity
3. Self-management in dementia care
4. Implementation of health care technology
All four themes share the same mission, namely: to stimulate ageing in place for people living with
dementia. To achieve this mission, one vision will be enhanced based on the key principles of an
ecosystem of Bergvall-Kåreborn and Ståhlbröst (2009): a pragmatic open innovation network
approach where co-creation is leading, and where high value innovations can be tested in a real life
environment like a home situation, that are potentially sustainable for people living with dementia.
The particular subject of this paper is the research of “Implementation of health care technology”.
The EDC is used as a social innovation approach to search for barriers and facilitators of scaling up
health innovations for people living with dementia and stimulate collaboration. All members of EDC
are using shared values, shared knowledge and shared savings as the fundaments of this
collaboration. To study the barriers and facilitators, focus group meetings (n=six) and
supplementary semi-structured interviews (n=16) were performed with respondents of health care
organisations, people who are living with dementia, care insurance companies, entrepreneurs and
members of knowledge institutes. The data were transcribed, coded and codified.
Results: Barriers and facilitators for scaling up
Six focus group meetings and 16 supplementary semi-structured interviews with several
stakeholders (healthcare professionals, members of different knowledge institutes, employees of
health insurance companies, entrepreneurs and people who are living with dementia) were
performed. Results show that collaboration between the stakeholders is a strong facilitator to make
scaling-up possible, in particular to create awareness and acceptance of the technology among
potential users. People living with dementia utter the need of a link between themselves and the
technology. This means that the perceive that the human aspect is to come into contact with
technological solutions is indispensable. As a client words it:
“So yes, it’s all about the link between the client, health care professional and producer, there has to
be something in between”.
It has been found that media such as the internet, often used by entrepreneurs to promote their
products to create awareness, are not sufficient to achieve acceptance and adoption of health care
innovations. Regarding to this human link, all stakeholder groups see health care professionals as
most important persons to fulfill this role. More specific, experts in dementia care such as dementia
consultants are indispensable for this matter.
Furthermore, barriers for an effective as well as an efficient pragmatic collaboration that
were discovered are different expectations and assumed responsibilities. For example, different
4. expectations regarding to which stakeholder has to finance assistive technology, seems to be an
important barrier. Furthermore, little consensus exists regarding to where an overview of
information can be found and which information is objective and reliable. Results show that a clear
description of tasks and task divisions for all stakeholders facilitates scaling up, while the lack of
such a description results in an impasse regarding the practical execution of tasks.
Apart from the adoption process of technology, barriers and facilitators were also found in
the earlier stage of the development of technology. Consensus about the collaboration between
product developers and people who are living with dementia in an early developmental stage, is
essential to achieve proper, desirable products. In practice, entrepreneurs are not used to the
involvement of people with dementia as a co-creator in a developmental stage but more as a tester
for prototypes in a later stage of the development. Acceptance and adoption of technology will,
according to all stakeholders, strongly be facilitated by co-creation in an early stage of the
development.
After awareness among potential users –people who are living with dementia- is created,
another strong barrier exists regarding the acceptance of the technology in order to achieve actual
purchase and use. “It seems too complex to use,” has often been said by clients as well as health
care professionals. Practical collaboration between technicians and health care professionals is
found to be facilitating for translating technical innovations to practical instruments. They are,
according to members of knowledge institutes, complementary in knowledge and skills that are
both needed to support the use, user-friendliness, and feasibility to use technology by people who
are living with dementia. As a member of a knowledge institute speaks:
“You shouldn’t address that matter [innovations for people who are living with dementia] only from
a healthcare perspective, or just from a technical perspective. You have to bridge those (…) and
there comes the role of the health care professional. They have to be trained to talk with such a
technician, and then he can translate the solution to the client with dementia in the right manner.”
Recommendations for future research and practice
Practical recommendations for the future are particularly related to the indispensable linking pin
between clients, health care professionals and product manufacturers. To achieve this, facilitation
of practical collaboration among different stakeholders is recommended, into which several follow-
up actions can be distinguished.
One major facilitator for scaling up innovations is the acceptation and adoption of these
innovations by the users. A positive trend is going on to stimulate co-creation. By including users in
the beginning of an innovation track as co-creators and not only as testers at the end of an
innovation track. A huge advantage of this co-creation approach is the direct input of users, product
developers know faster if the innovation is successful and ready for market or needs a new iteration
phase (Van Gemert-Pijnen et al., 2011). Although co-creation is important by developing
innovations to understand the user’s needs better, but more attention should be made for social
innovation in scaling up innovations. This finding is supported by Volberda (2013a, 2013b, 2014),
5. whose studies show that 75% of an innovation’s success is due to the technology and 25% derives
from the social aspects i.e. social innovation.
Future research should study the direct effects of several existing and new collaborations
between private and public parties in dementia care regarding the level of acceptance adoption and
actual use of innovations by people who are living with dementia, as well professional caregivers.
Collaboration of all stakeholders with a shared vision of shared knowledge, shared savings and
shared values, seems very promising to make acceptance, adoption and therefore scaling-up
possible. To make statements about sustainability of EDC, research of longer duration is
recommended.
6. References
BERGVALL-KÅREBORN, B and STÅLBRÖST, A. (2009) Living lab: an open and citizen-centric
approach for innovation. International journal of innovation and regional development, 1 (4), 356-370.
GLASGOW, R. E., VINSON, C., CHAMBERS, D., KHOURY, M.J., KAPLAN, R.M. and HUNTER, C.
(2012). National institutes of health approaches to dissemination and implementation science:
current and future directions. American journal of public health, 102 (7), 1274-1281.
JONKER, C.H.R., VERHEY, F.R.J. and SLAETS, J.P.J. (2009). Handboek dementie. Apeldoorn, Bohn
Stafleu van Loghum.
MICHELI, P., SCHOEMAN, M., BAXTER, D. and GOFFIN, K. (2012). New business models for public-
sector innovation. Research-technology management, 51-57.
NIJHOF, N., VAN GEMERT-PIJNEN., J.E.W.C., DOHMEN, D.A.J. and SEYDEL, E.R. (2009).
Dementia and technology. A study of technology interventions in the healthcare for dementia
patients and their caregivers. Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie [e-journal], 40 (3), 113-132.
OIRSCHOT, R., SOONIEUS, E., BAKE, J. and KROON, R. (2010). Eindrapportage Kennis (in) kaart
succes- en belemmeringsfactoren voor het versnellen van opschaling en innovaties. [pdf]. Den Haag,
Alares. Last accessed 27 October 2014 at:
http://www.zorgvoorinnoveren.nl/upload/file/Rapportage%20Kennis(in)kaart%20-
%20Onderzoek%20naar%20succesfactoren%20en%20belemmeringen%20bij%20opschalen%20va
n%20zorginnovatie.pdf
VAN DER LEEUW, J. and WILLEMS, C.G. (2007). Aanzet van een functioneel programma van eisen
voor domotica voor thuiswonende mensen met dementie. Utrecht, Vilans, kenniscirkel domotica
voor wonen en zorg. Last accessed 16 November 2014 at:
http://www.vilans.nl/docs/producten/Technologiethuiswonendementerende.pdf
VAN GEMERT-PIJNEN, J.E., NIJLAND, N., VAN LIMBURG, M., OSSEBAARD, H.C., KELDERS, S.M.,
EYSENBACH, G. and SEYDEL, E.R. (2011). A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact
of eHealth technologies. [Review]. J Med Internet Res, 13 (4), e111. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1672
VOLBERDA, H.W., COMMANDEUR, H., VAN DEN BOSCH, F. and HEIJ, K. (2013). Sociale innovatie
als aanjager van productiviteit en concurrentiekracht. M&O, 5, 5-34.
VOLBERDA, H.W. (2014). Investeren in sociale innovatie. Rotterdam, Inscope.
7. VOLBERDA, H.W., HEIJ, K and VAN DEN BOSCH, F.A.J. (2013). Erasmus concurrentie en innovatie
monitor 2012-2013. Rotterdam, Inscope.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. (2012). Dementia: a public health priority. [pfd]. World health
organization. Last accessed 3 November 2014 at:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75263/1/9789241564458_eng.pdf?ua=1
ZANTINGE, E.M., VAN DER WILK, E.A.,VAN WIEREN, S. and SCHOEMAKER, C.G. (2011). Gezond
ouder worden in Nederland. Rijksinstituut voor volksgezondheid en milieu (RIVM)
ZWAANSWIJK, M. (2010). Problemen en wensen van mantelzorgers van mensen met dementie:
een vergelijking tussen de beginfase en latere fasen in het ziekteproces. Tijdschrift voor gerontologie
en geriatrie, 4 (4), 162-171. doi:10.1007/BF03096203