This document discusses challenges with carcass disposal during avian influenza outbreaks and options for protecting animal agriculture. It notes that burial of infected carcasses can contaminate groundwater with high levels of nitrogen. Alternative options like composting, landfilling, and rendering are evaluated, with landfilling posing risks if leachate enters water sources but having potential for virus inactivation if buried deeply and far from collection systems. Preparing disposal agreements with landfills in advance is recommended to facilitate response in future outbreaks.
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Jatin Das Park 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
Protecting Animal Agriculture: Carcass Management and HPAI Disposal
1. Protecting Animal Agriculture
Carcass Management and HPAI
2015 Challenges
October 14, 2015
Lori P. Miller, PE
USDA APHIS
Lori.p.miller@aphis.usda.gov
3. Protecting Animal Agriculture
0 ft BGS
10 ft BGS
30 ft BGS
35 BGS
❶
BARN HOME
LEACHATE/ GROUNDWATER
Burial Effect on Environment
Property values? Clean-Up Liability?
4. Protecting Animal Agriculture
Why is nitrogen a problem?
• EPA standard for nitrates in drinking water is 10.0 mg/L
• Carcass burial sites generate over 1000 times the
standard
• Causes Methemoglobinemia (blue baby syndrome)
which can be fatal to infants
• Toxic to aquatic life
• Depletes dissolved oxygen in receiving waters
• Stimulates aquatic plant growth (eutrophication)
7. Protecting Animal Agriculture
Avian Influenza Disposal Decision Tree
Is In-House
Composting
Feasible?
If not, is Outdoor
Composting
Feasible?
If not, is Onsite
Burial permitted?
If not, are Mobile
Technologies
available?
If not, are landfills
available?
If not, are
rendering plants
available?
If not, are
incinerators
available?
If not, reconsider
previous options.
See
Checklist to
answer
questions
10. Protecting Animal Agriculture
Landfill Challenges
• Concerns about risk of infected leachate, protection of
operators, public opposition, and potential lawsuits.
• Federal government, state government, and landfill
companies worked together for 42 days to get first load
accepted
• During that time, developed waste acceptance criteria to
address operational issues,
• Developed safety guidelines for operators with CDC and
NIOSH,
• APHIS developed Frequently Asked Questions for public
• Landfill companies requested federal indemnification but
APHIS was prohibited by law
• State of Iowa agreed to provide indemnity
11. Protecting Animal Agriculture
Risks from Landfill Leachate
• Virus lasts less than 6 days in infected carcass at room temperature
(Busquets et al, 2010); if it takes a day to euthanize, collect, and
transport to landfill, there will be 90% (1 log) reduction in virus
loading;
• Virus lasts less than 29 days in landfill leachate at 95F, less than 40
days at 70F (Graiver et al, 2009);
• If infected birds are landfilled 30 feet from the leachate collection
system, the amount of virus will be reduced 99.9% (3 log reduction)
at 95F by the time the leachate reaches the collection system.
12. Protecting Animal Agriculture
Mitigating Risks from Landfill
Leachate
• Burial of waste far (at least 90 feet) from the leachate collection
system will further reduce virus concentration due to time at
elevated temperatures
• Burial of waste at least 24 ft deep and at least 60 feet from edges of
the landfill will ensure elevated temperatures (73F to 135F) (Yesiller
et al, 2005) and faster virus inactivation
• Leachate discharged to a pond or wetland will further reduce the
virus concentration.
• Landfills that spray concentrated leachate directly from the leachate
collection system onto the surface of the landfill can use bird hazing
while spraying to avoid exposing mallards (most susceptible
species)
13. Protecting Animal Agriculture
Looking Forward
• Numerous efforts underway to identify and address
lessons learned
• Many states are working with local landfills to develop
agreements in advance
• This fall could be worse than the spring in terms of
number of affected premises
• Landfills are an important option for a successful
response