Webinar : A CCS communications framework developed by the Japanese Knowledge ...Global CCS Institute
This webinar was led by Dr Hiroyasu Takase, Managing Director of Quintessa Japan. Knowledge sharing in a multidisciplinary and multi-stakeholder project such as a CCS project, presents challenges for motivating and facilitating creative interactions among experts from diverse areas of practice, as well as interactions between experts and non-expert stakeholders.
In the last three years, the Global CCS Institute has been empowering a community of CCS experts in Japan to develop and test their ideas, methodologies and toolkits to meet these challenges. An overview of this work was presented in the webinar together with lessons learnt, bearing in mind their possible use by other members. In addition, issues to be addressed by further work will be briefly discussed.
Webinar : A CCS communications framework developed by the Japanese Knowledge ...Global CCS Institute
This webinar was led by Dr Hiroyasu Takase, Managing Director of Quintessa Japan. Knowledge sharing in a multidisciplinary and multi-stakeholder project such as a CCS project, presents challenges for motivating and facilitating creative interactions among experts from diverse areas of practice, as well as interactions between experts and non-expert stakeholders.
In the last three years, the Global CCS Institute has been empowering a community of CCS experts in Japan to develop and test their ideas, methodologies and toolkits to meet these challenges. An overview of this work was presented in the webinar together with lessons learnt, bearing in mind their possible use by other members. In addition, issues to be addressed by further work will be briefly discussed.
4. McNamara:11 Lessons from Vietnam (The Fog of War)
1. Empathize with your enemy.
2. Rationality will not save us.
3. There’s something beyond one’s
self.
4. Maximize efficiency.
5. Proportionality should be a
guideline in war.
6. Get the data.
7. Belief and seeing are both often
wrong.
8. Be prepared to reexamine your
reasoning.
9. In order to do good, you may have
to engage in evil.
10.Never say never.
11.You can’t change human nature.
1. 敵に感情移入せよ。
2. 合理性は我々を救わない。
3. 自己のセルフ、利己を越えるものが何
かがある。
4. 効率を最大化せよ。
5. 均斉、釣り合いというものは戦争でのガ
イドラインであるだろう。
6. データを得よ。
7. 信じることと見ることはしばしば両方とも
間違っている。
8. あなた自身の論理、理を再点検する準
備をせよ。
9. よきことをするためには、悪と提携しなけ
ればならないかもしれない。
10.決してない、しない、絶対ない、というこ
とは決していわない、
11.人間の本性、性質は変えることは出来
ない。
6. デモクラシーの原則
(produced by the Bureau of International Information Program,
U.S. Department of State)
1.デモクラシーとは何か
2.多数者の支配、個人の保護
と少数者の権利
3.市民と軍、シビリアン・コント
ロール
4.政党
5.市民の義務
6.自由な報道
7.連邦主義
8.法の支配
9.人権
10.行政権
11.立法
12.独立した司法府
13.合憲主義
14.言論と表現の自由
15.政府のアカウンタビティー
16.自由公平な選挙
17.宗教信仰の自由
18.女性と女子の権利
19.連立・連携と譲歩・妥協
20.非政府組織の役割
21.教育とデモクラシー
11. What is a Think Tank?
A think tank is an organization that conducts public-policy research,
analysis, and advice on domestic and international issues, which enable
policy makers and the public to make informed decisions about public
policy issues.
Functions:
• Generate new information through research
• Evaluate public policies and programs
• Provide policy advice to government
• Educate public through publications and seminars
• Engage policymakers, media and the public
McGann, 2012
16. Countries with the Largest Number of TT
1. Unites States 1830
2. China 429
3. United Kingdom 287
4. Germany 194
5. India 192
6. France 177
7. Argentina 137
8. Russia 122
9. Japan 108
10. Canada 99
18. Wealthiest Foundations
World Wealthest Foundations Asset 設立
1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation United States $42.3 billon 1994
2. Stichting INGKA Foundation Netherlands $36.0 billion 1982
3. Wellcome Trust United Kingdom $25.9 billion 1936
4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute United States $16.9 billion 1953
5. Ford Foundation United States $11.2 billion 1936
6. J. Paul Getty Trust United States $10.5 billion 1982
7. Kamehameha School United States $10.1 billion 1887
8. Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation UAE $10.0 billion 2007
9. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation United States $9.53 billion 1972
10. William Flora Hewlett Foundation United States $8.7 billion 1967
11. Li Ka Shing Foundation Hong Kong $8.3 billion 1980
12. The MasterCard Foundation Canada $8.2 billion 2006
13. W.K. Kellogg Foundation United States $8.16 billion 1930
14. The Church Commissioners for England Unite Kingdom $8.1 billion 1948
15. Lily Endowment United States $7.7 billion 1937
19. United States Think Tanks
Some facts of US think tanks:
• There are 6,618 think tanks in the world now found in 182
countries and the vast majority of think tanks are found in
the United States , 1,823. 90.5% created since 1951, 31%
between 1981-1990.
• In the United States, think tanks are filled with individuals
who go in and out of government
• Government rely on think tanks because they generate and
offer solutions to some of the most complex issues of the
day.
20. Think Tank Ranking Criteria
Special Achievement
Best Advocacy Campaign
Best For-Profit Think Tanks
Best Government Affiliated Think Tanks
Best Managed Think Tanks
Best Policy Study/Report Produced by a Think Tank 2013-2014
Best Think Tank Conference
Think Tanks with Best Use of the Internet
Think Tanks with the Best Use of the Media
Think Tanks with the Most Innovative Policy Ideas/Proposals
Think Tanks with the Most Significant Impact on Public Policy
Think tanks with Outstanding Policy-Oriented Public Programs
Top Think Tanks with Annual Operating budgets of Less Than $5 Million USD
21. Think Tank Ranking Criteria
Area of Research
Defense and National Security: 国家安全保障
Domestic Economic Policy:国内経済政策
Education Policy: 教育政策
Energy and Resource Policy:エネルギー・資源政策
Environment:環境問題
Foreign Policy and International Affairs:外交政策、国際関係
Domestic Health Policy:国内健康医療施策
Global Health Policy:グローバル健康医療政策
International Development:国際開発
International Economic Policy:国際経済政策
Science and Technology:科学技術政策
Social Policy:社会政策
Transparency and Good Governance:透明性とグッド・ガバナンス
22. Top 20 Think Tanks in the United States
McGann, 2014
1. Brookings Institution
2. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
3. Center for Strategic and International Studies
4. Council on Foreign Relations
5. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
6. Rand Corporation
7. Pew Research Center
8. Cato Institute
9. Heritage Foundation
10. Center for American Progress (CAP)
23. Top Think Tanks in the United Statescontinued
11. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
12. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy
Research (AEI)
13. Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE)
14. Center for a New American Security (CNAS)
15. World Resources Institute (WRI)
16. Atlantic Council
17. Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs
18. James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy
19. Hoover Institution
20. Urban Institute
24. U.S. Think Tanks by State
McGann, 2014
State # of Think Tanks
Washington, D.C. 396
Massachusetts 176
California 173
New York 146
Virginia 105
Illinois 55
Maryland 50
Texas 47
Connecticut 45
Pennsylvania 42
25. Different Characteristics of Think Tanks
#1 Area of Research
Brookings Institution
United States
Area of Research:
Economic Studies
Foreign Policy
Global Economy
Development
Governance Studies
Japan Marine Science, Inc
Japan
Area of Research:
Maritime technology
Traffic route/passage design
Transportation technologyOther possible areas of research
are:
•Domestic economy
•International health
•Environment
•Human Rights
•Business
•Information & Communication
•Science &Technology
•Security
•Peace Studies
•Education
26. Different Characteristics of Think Tanks
#3 Budget
Rand Corporation
United States
Specialties: Military strategy, political
economy, health and education policy
Budget: $251,000,000
Adam Smith Institute
London
Specialties: Free market and social policies
Budget: $500,000
Some have budgets in the tens of millions of dollars and some are
one-man operations
27. Different Characteristics of Think Tanks
#4 Scope of Influence
Some think tanks like CSIS are shaping national
policy with their ideas and research; others merely
offer ideas to help government operate.
Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
United States
41. オバマの政策アプローチ
Show me the Evidence: Obama’s Fight for
Rigor and Results in Social Policy
written by Ron Haskins & Greg Margolis
published by Brookings Institution, 2015
オバマ政権における社会政策の形成・決定・実施の
厳密性と成果を求める挑戦・闘い。
51. Bibliography
Global “Go-To-Think Tanks” Report 2008 by James McGann
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/files/2008_Global_Go_To_Think_Tanks.pdf
Robert S. McNamara 1995. In Retrospect: Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam. Random House, Inc.
Raymond Struyk 2015. Improving Think Tank Management. Results For Development Institute.
James G. McGann 2015. 2014 Global Go To think tanks Index Report. Think Tanks and Civil
Societies Program. University of Pennsylvania.
http://www.2014_Global_Go_To_Think_Tank_Index_Report.pdf
Helped by:
Kaede Kawauchi
Universityof Pennsylvania
Class of 2011