The document analyzes a 2009 study of consumer perceptions of reputation for the 600 largest global companies across 32 countries. Three key findings:
1) Ferrero, IKEA, and Johnson & Johnson had the best reputations overall, with 22 companies scoring over 80/100.
2) Companies from emerging markets like Brazil, India, and China tended to have stronger reputations than those from developed countries.
3) Transparency and ethics were increasingly important to consumers in building reputation beyond just products/services.
The Global Pulse 2008 study measured the reputations of over 1,000 of the world's largest companies in 27 countries. Toyota was ranked as having the best reputation with a Global Pulse score of 86.53. The top 50 companies, which all had Global Pulse scores above 80, represented 13 different countries and were dominated by companies in the food and consumer products industries. The study provides insight into how the general public perceives large companies worldwide.
Reputation Institute's - 2009 Global Reputation Pulse Reportjasoncronkhite
Reputation Institute's Global Reputation Pulse project surveyed more than 60,000 people in 32 countries, to measure consumer perceptions of 1,000 companies in North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Africa.
El Global Reputation Pulse es un estudio anual de la reputación de las compañías más grandes del mundo. Este estudio ha sido desarrollado por Reputation Institute con el objetivo de proporcionar a los ejecutivos una visión general y en profundidad sobre la reputación de sus compañías con respecto a los consumidores.
El Global Reputation Pulse analiza a las compañías más grandes del mundo en cada país, en función de sus "ingresos totales”. Además, las empresas evaluadas deben cumplir otros criterios, como tener una presencia significativa entre los consumidores y ser, al menos, familiares para público general. Todas las empresas son evaluadas sólo en su país de origen solamente, y posteriormente, los resultados son estandarizados, de forma que se elimina la variación única relacionada con el país de origen, para permitir comparaciones entre empresas de distintos países.
El Global Reputation Pulse es un estudio anual de la reputación de las compañías más grandes del mundo. Este estudio ha sido desarrollado por Reputation Institute con el objetivo de proporcionar una visión general y en profundidad sobre la reputación corporativa de las principales compañías del mundo con respecto a los consumidores.
El Global Reputation Pulse analiza a las compañías más grandes del mundo en cada país, en función de sus "ingresos totales”. Además, las empresas evaluadas deben cumplir otros criterios, como tener una presencia significativa entre los consumidores y ser, al menos, familiares para público general. Todas las empresas son evaluadas sólo en su país de origen solamente, y posteriormente, los resultados son estandarizados, de forma que se elimina la variación única relacionada con el país de origen, para permitir comparaciones entre empresas de distintos países.
Sustainability in Korea: Performance & Trends 2013SolAbility
This document discusses corporate sustainability and governance issues in Korea in 2013. It provides an overview of trends showing increasing management awareness of sustainability but stagnating governance practices. Financial returns for sustainable companies significantly outperformed the market. The document also analyzes issues around controlling family structures ("Chaebols") of large Korean conglomerates that concentrate power and hamper independent oversight.
The document summarizes a conference on collaboration, cultural change and competitive edge through corporate social responsibility. The conference will provide tools and proven strategies for embedding CSR throughout organizations to create business value and measurable returns. Speakers will address issues like managing supply chain risk under new regulations and forming partnerships to advance CSR programs. Attendees can learn how leading companies meet long-term sustainability targets and engage investors on ESG issues.
XanGo introduces its new wellness product Formula X51, which was developed over several years to address metabolic imbalance and restore natural vigor by reducing fatigue, stress, and depression through balancing hormones, enzymes, and neurotransmitters. Formula X51 is designed to complement XanGo Juice in supporting overall wellness, and initial product trials found that Formula X51 significantly reduced fatigue and improved vigor. With the launch of Formula X51, XanGo expects continued strong sales growth and momentum for the company.
The document discusses Google's organizational culture and belief system. It analyzes Google's flat, autonomous structure and how well it is suited to competition. Google's culture is described as having high sociability and solidarity, placing it in the "networked" sector of the Goffee-Jones matrix. While Google's unique culture drives innovation, some aspects like low control could challenge sustainability in changing competitive landscapes. The document evaluates if any parts of Google's belief system may be outdated given shifts in its business environment and technology trends.
The Global Pulse 2008 study measured the reputations of over 1,000 of the world's largest companies in 27 countries. Toyota was ranked as having the best reputation with a Global Pulse score of 86.53. The top 50 companies, which all had Global Pulse scores above 80, represented 13 different countries and were dominated by companies in the food and consumer products industries. The study provides insight into how the general public perceives large companies worldwide.
Reputation Institute's - 2009 Global Reputation Pulse Reportjasoncronkhite
Reputation Institute's Global Reputation Pulse project surveyed more than 60,000 people in 32 countries, to measure consumer perceptions of 1,000 companies in North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Africa.
El Global Reputation Pulse es un estudio anual de la reputación de las compañías más grandes del mundo. Este estudio ha sido desarrollado por Reputation Institute con el objetivo de proporcionar a los ejecutivos una visión general y en profundidad sobre la reputación de sus compañías con respecto a los consumidores.
El Global Reputation Pulse analiza a las compañías más grandes del mundo en cada país, en función de sus "ingresos totales”. Además, las empresas evaluadas deben cumplir otros criterios, como tener una presencia significativa entre los consumidores y ser, al menos, familiares para público general. Todas las empresas son evaluadas sólo en su país de origen solamente, y posteriormente, los resultados son estandarizados, de forma que se elimina la variación única relacionada con el país de origen, para permitir comparaciones entre empresas de distintos países.
El Global Reputation Pulse es un estudio anual de la reputación de las compañías más grandes del mundo. Este estudio ha sido desarrollado por Reputation Institute con el objetivo de proporcionar una visión general y en profundidad sobre la reputación corporativa de las principales compañías del mundo con respecto a los consumidores.
El Global Reputation Pulse analiza a las compañías más grandes del mundo en cada país, en función de sus "ingresos totales”. Además, las empresas evaluadas deben cumplir otros criterios, como tener una presencia significativa entre los consumidores y ser, al menos, familiares para público general. Todas las empresas son evaluadas sólo en su país de origen solamente, y posteriormente, los resultados son estandarizados, de forma que se elimina la variación única relacionada con el país de origen, para permitir comparaciones entre empresas de distintos países.
Sustainability in Korea: Performance & Trends 2013SolAbility
This document discusses corporate sustainability and governance issues in Korea in 2013. It provides an overview of trends showing increasing management awareness of sustainability but stagnating governance practices. Financial returns for sustainable companies significantly outperformed the market. The document also analyzes issues around controlling family structures ("Chaebols") of large Korean conglomerates that concentrate power and hamper independent oversight.
The document summarizes a conference on collaboration, cultural change and competitive edge through corporate social responsibility. The conference will provide tools and proven strategies for embedding CSR throughout organizations to create business value and measurable returns. Speakers will address issues like managing supply chain risk under new regulations and forming partnerships to advance CSR programs. Attendees can learn how leading companies meet long-term sustainability targets and engage investors on ESG issues.
XanGo introduces its new wellness product Formula X51, which was developed over several years to address metabolic imbalance and restore natural vigor by reducing fatigue, stress, and depression through balancing hormones, enzymes, and neurotransmitters. Formula X51 is designed to complement XanGo Juice in supporting overall wellness, and initial product trials found that Formula X51 significantly reduced fatigue and improved vigor. With the launch of Formula X51, XanGo expects continued strong sales growth and momentum for the company.
The document discusses Google's organizational culture and belief system. It analyzes Google's flat, autonomous structure and how well it is suited to competition. Google's culture is described as having high sociability and solidarity, placing it in the "networked" sector of the Goffee-Jones matrix. While Google's unique culture drives innovation, some aspects like low control could challenge sustainability in changing competitive landscapes. The document evaluates if any parts of Google's belief system may be outdated given shifts in its business environment and technology trends.
The document discusses how leading organizations are driving performance through employee engagement despite lacking resources during economic downturns. It finds that highly engaged employees are 2.5 times more productive than peers, but engagement alone is not enough - employees must also feel enabled to perform at their best. Top organizations achieve high performance by cultivating a strong employer brand, carefully linking rewards to business goals, and developing inspiring leaders who create an environment where people feel motivated and empowered.
Collaborative Leadership at HR Directors Business Summit Engage Group
This presentation supported Annie Hazlerigg’s, Senior Consultant at Engage Group, presentation at HR Directors Business Summit in Birmingham on the theme of collaborative leadership, giving organisations a framework for developing their collaboration strategies.
For more information, please visit www.engagegroup.co.uk
Presentación de Charles Fombrun, Presidente del Reputation Institute, en le marco de la presentación del informe Reputation Pulse España 2010, el 7 de mayo 2010, en EOI, Escuela de Organización Industrial.
Leadership Impacts the Bottom Line...Is leadership development a key componen...Arseth Insights
Strong leadership is a strategic imperative in today's competitive market place. What critical skills are emerging in this new environment and how do you develop them?
Arseth Insights is an executive coaching firm offering executive leadership coaching and leadership development services.
Mba Tech Slides Dangelo Submission 022008 [Compatibility Mode]mpdangelo
The document discusses how global sourcing strategies can help companies adapt and grow in an increasingly "flat world" where boundaries are less defined. It argues that companies need to examine their entire operations and value chains to identify opportunities for outsourcing or collaboration beyond just labor costs. A holistic and iterative approach is needed to transition processes smoothly and ensure long-term sustainability through adaptable governance models. Global sourcing allows for new implementation models and workforce mixes to enhance competitiveness in changing industry conditions.
Haciendo del Voluntariado Corporativo para el Desarrollo una mult-herramienta...Fundación CODESPA
Describe la importancia de la integración de los objetivos de negocio y sociales y cómo esto puede hacerse a través del voluntariado corportativo y ejemplo del proyecto Engage
Best Places To Work In HR 2008 Research ReportGareth Jones
The document provides results from a survey of HR professionals rating their employer organizations.
Overall, medium-sized private sector organizations scored the best, taking 4 of the top 5 places. Benefits, maternity leave, work hours, and reward/recognition were common themes across sectors.
When comparing private vs public sectors, the private sector generally offered better benefits while the public sector offered better maternity pay. Small organizations performed worst in benefits and maternity.
Across sectors, maternity leave varied greatly, with manufacturing, transport/logistics, and chemicals having the lowest family-friendliness. Reward/recognition and benefits need improvement across all sectors.
The chapter discusses organizational culture and change. It describes how organizational culture helps management achieve objectives by uniting employees through shared values and norms. Culture is sustained through symbols, rituals, heroes and stories. Strong cultures can facilitate or inhibit change which organizations may pursue to achieve goals in response to environmental or internal forces. Models like Lewin's three-step model and force-field analysis are presented to understand and manage change while addressing potential resistance.
The Global Reptrak 2015 - Las marcas con la mejor reputación del mundoMilton Vela Valencia
El Reptrak es el modelo para el estudio de la reputación de las compañías propuesto por Reputation Institute, que cada año realiza un estudio anual en más de 15 países del mundo de diferentes continentes, para clasificar a las empresas más importantes, con 7 criterios: Oferta, innovación, gestión del talento, integridad, ciudadanía, liderazgo y salud financiera.
BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2013Kantar
The BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands report found that overall brand value increased 7% to $2.6 trillion. Several key themes emerged:
1) Recovery - Economies continued to improve in many markets, allowing brands to regain value lost during the recession.
2) Refinement - Rather than major innovations, brands focused on incremental improvements to encourage cautious consumer spending.
3) Relevance - Brands sought to offer personal relevance to more reflective consumers.
Financial, consumer, and technology brands saw mixed results, with financial brands improving the most at 20% as profits rebounded. Strong brands continued to outperform the stock market, growing 58% over eight years versus 23%
The BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands report found that overall brand value increased 7% to $2.6 trillion. Key highlights include:
- Financial brands such as global banks and regional banks saw strong growth of 23% and 15% respectively, recovering value lost during the recession.
- Consumer categories like apparel, retail, and personal care rebounded with growth rates of 21%, 17%, and 11%.
- The technology category was flat as brands focused on incremental improvements rather than major innovations.
- Commodity categories like oil and gas declined, with the category decreasing 4% in value.
- Fast growing markets still contributed brands but the number declined to 17 from
An introduction to global Havas meaningful brands study by Yves Del Frate, CO...Maxus Belgium
The document discusses how relationships between people and brands are changing. Some key points:
- 73% of people would not care if most brands disappeared, and less than 20% of brands notably improve quality of life. People's attachment to brands varies by region.
- Expectations of brands' role in society are growing, with over 70% of people in Western Europe believing brands should help solve social/environmental problems and improve well-being. However, fewer than half feel brands currently meet these expectations.
- A new "Meaningful Brands Index" measures how much brands contribute to people's lives. The top 25 most meaningful global brands are listed, with half being technological brands. Some brands are
This document introduces the BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands report for 2011. It provides an overview of the report, which ranks the 100 most valuable global brands based on quantitative consumer research and financial analysis. New sections this year include commentary on trends influencing brands and brand valuations, as well as in-depth reports on brand development in Brazil, China, and India. Brands are analyzed across 13 sectors and the rankings provide insight for business leaders making strategic decisions.
Global brands allow companies to achieve economies of scale in production and marketing. However, some national brands are better suited to local tastes and cultures. The document discusses the advantages and risks of both global and national brands. It concludes that companies should use global brands where possible but national brands where necessary to adapt to local conditions.
Brandz Report là báo cáo về thương hiệu uy tín thứ 2 trên toàn thế giới (sau BBR của Interbrand) được xuất bản hằng năm.
Đây là báo cáo năm 2014.
Millward Brown hiện là công ty con của WPP.
This document provides an analysis of Estee Lauder Companies' current position, performance, vision, mission, objectives, external environment, internal strengths and weaknesses. It discusses Estee Lauder's 26 brands operating in over 130 countries, growth in different product segments, geographic revenue analysis, and financial performance from 2005-2007. PESTLE, Porter's 5 Forces, and external/internal factor analyses are also included. Recommended strategies are market development, penetration, product development, and forward/backward/horizontal integration.
The document discusses the Global Corporate Reputation Index, which evaluates the reputations of over 6,000 companies based on consumer surveys in 6 countries. It finds that while performance scores are higher than citizenship scores, companies with strong reputations excel at both. Tech companies have the best reputations overall, while oil and gas score lowest. China has the strongest company reputations, while Japan and Brazil are most critical. Long-standing companies tend to have stronger, more durable reputations. The top 25 companies are revealed.
Up 7% BrandZ™ Top 100 Rises 7 percent With growth across categories Year of recovery, refinement and relevance There was a new tone. It fit the new normal. Both brands and consumers adjusted to constant uncertainty and sober expectations about economic growth.
They fit into the calculus of consumption the impact on the natural environment, personal health, and human well being along the supply chain. Shaped by these considerations, brand value appreciated. The value of the BrandZ™ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands rose 7 percent to $2.6 trillion last year, compared with a flat performance a year ago. All but two of the 13 categories analyzed in this report improved in brand value.
Technology and oil and gas declined modestly. These results indicate that strong brands continue to regain value lost during the recession and now, in some cases, surpass their pre-recession levels. The total brand value of the BrandZ™ Top 100 Strong Brands Portfolio has improved 77 percent since 2006. In addition, the BrandZ™ Top 100 Strong Brands Port-folio, comprised of diverse public companies, appreciated 58 percent during that eight-year period, compared with a market value gain of only 23 percent by the S&P 500. Despite a sharp decline in the growth of its brand value last year, Apple remained number one in the BrandZ™ Top 100 ranking, on the strength of the meaningful difference of its brand. Google moved to the number two position, marginally surpassing IBM, which continues to be the world’s most valuable B2B brand. These brands demonstrate both the capacity to grow brand strength quickly (Apple was founded in 1976, Google in 1998) and sustain it over time (IBM celebrated its centennial in 2011).
Three key themes emerge from the BrandZ™ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2013: Recovery The economy continued to improve— not everywhere, but in the US. All categories experienced healthy sales. Refinement With confidence still fragile, brands resisted introducing break-through innovations and instead encouraged consumer spending with incremental product and service improvements.
Relevance Reaching these more reflective consumers required offering products and services that not only projected mass appeal, but also promised personal relevance for the individual. BrandZ™ Portfolio outperforms S&P 500 Over the past seven years, the S&P 500 increased 23 percent in market value. In contrast, the BrandZ™ Portfolio of the strongest brands appreciated 58 percent.
The value of the top 100 global brands, as measured by the BrandZ ranking, grew 7% in the past year. This indicates that strong brands continue recovering value lost during the recession and sometimes surpassing pre-recession levels. Key themes from the report include recovery in the economy and sales, brand refinement through incremental improvements rather than major innovations, and an emphasis on personal relevance for consumers. Financial brands showed strong growth, accounting for 20% of total brand value, reflecting profit rebounds and new initiatives. Food and drink brands saw mixed results depending on category challenges.
This document provides an executive summary of the BrandZ Top 100 Most Powerful Brands Ranking for 2008. It highlights that the total brand value of the Top 100 brands increased 1% from 2007 to $1.94 trillion in 2008, with Google ranked as the most valuable brand. It also notes trends such as the strong performance of technology brands and brands from emerging markets like China. The summary identifies several sectors that experienced high brand value growth such as mobile operators, technology, personal care, and fast food.
The document discusses how leading organizations are driving performance through employee engagement despite lacking resources during economic downturns. It finds that highly engaged employees are 2.5 times more productive than peers, but engagement alone is not enough - employees must also feel enabled to perform at their best. Top organizations achieve high performance by cultivating a strong employer brand, carefully linking rewards to business goals, and developing inspiring leaders who create an environment where people feel motivated and empowered.
Collaborative Leadership at HR Directors Business Summit Engage Group
This presentation supported Annie Hazlerigg’s, Senior Consultant at Engage Group, presentation at HR Directors Business Summit in Birmingham on the theme of collaborative leadership, giving organisations a framework for developing their collaboration strategies.
For more information, please visit www.engagegroup.co.uk
Presentación de Charles Fombrun, Presidente del Reputation Institute, en le marco de la presentación del informe Reputation Pulse España 2010, el 7 de mayo 2010, en EOI, Escuela de Organización Industrial.
Leadership Impacts the Bottom Line...Is leadership development a key componen...Arseth Insights
Strong leadership is a strategic imperative in today's competitive market place. What critical skills are emerging in this new environment and how do you develop them?
Arseth Insights is an executive coaching firm offering executive leadership coaching and leadership development services.
Mba Tech Slides Dangelo Submission 022008 [Compatibility Mode]mpdangelo
The document discusses how global sourcing strategies can help companies adapt and grow in an increasingly "flat world" where boundaries are less defined. It argues that companies need to examine their entire operations and value chains to identify opportunities for outsourcing or collaboration beyond just labor costs. A holistic and iterative approach is needed to transition processes smoothly and ensure long-term sustainability through adaptable governance models. Global sourcing allows for new implementation models and workforce mixes to enhance competitiveness in changing industry conditions.
Haciendo del Voluntariado Corporativo para el Desarrollo una mult-herramienta...Fundación CODESPA
Describe la importancia de la integración de los objetivos de negocio y sociales y cómo esto puede hacerse a través del voluntariado corportativo y ejemplo del proyecto Engage
Best Places To Work In HR 2008 Research ReportGareth Jones
The document provides results from a survey of HR professionals rating their employer organizations.
Overall, medium-sized private sector organizations scored the best, taking 4 of the top 5 places. Benefits, maternity leave, work hours, and reward/recognition were common themes across sectors.
When comparing private vs public sectors, the private sector generally offered better benefits while the public sector offered better maternity pay. Small organizations performed worst in benefits and maternity.
Across sectors, maternity leave varied greatly, with manufacturing, transport/logistics, and chemicals having the lowest family-friendliness. Reward/recognition and benefits need improvement across all sectors.
The chapter discusses organizational culture and change. It describes how organizational culture helps management achieve objectives by uniting employees through shared values and norms. Culture is sustained through symbols, rituals, heroes and stories. Strong cultures can facilitate or inhibit change which organizations may pursue to achieve goals in response to environmental or internal forces. Models like Lewin's three-step model and force-field analysis are presented to understand and manage change while addressing potential resistance.
The Global Reptrak 2015 - Las marcas con la mejor reputación del mundoMilton Vela Valencia
El Reptrak es el modelo para el estudio de la reputación de las compañías propuesto por Reputation Institute, que cada año realiza un estudio anual en más de 15 países del mundo de diferentes continentes, para clasificar a las empresas más importantes, con 7 criterios: Oferta, innovación, gestión del talento, integridad, ciudadanía, liderazgo y salud financiera.
BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2013Kantar
The BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands report found that overall brand value increased 7% to $2.6 trillion. Several key themes emerged:
1) Recovery - Economies continued to improve in many markets, allowing brands to regain value lost during the recession.
2) Refinement - Rather than major innovations, brands focused on incremental improvements to encourage cautious consumer spending.
3) Relevance - Brands sought to offer personal relevance to more reflective consumers.
Financial, consumer, and technology brands saw mixed results, with financial brands improving the most at 20% as profits rebounded. Strong brands continued to outperform the stock market, growing 58% over eight years versus 23%
The BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands report found that overall brand value increased 7% to $2.6 trillion. Key highlights include:
- Financial brands such as global banks and regional banks saw strong growth of 23% and 15% respectively, recovering value lost during the recession.
- Consumer categories like apparel, retail, and personal care rebounded with growth rates of 21%, 17%, and 11%.
- The technology category was flat as brands focused on incremental improvements rather than major innovations.
- Commodity categories like oil and gas declined, with the category decreasing 4% in value.
- Fast growing markets still contributed brands but the number declined to 17 from
An introduction to global Havas meaningful brands study by Yves Del Frate, CO...Maxus Belgium
The document discusses how relationships between people and brands are changing. Some key points:
- 73% of people would not care if most brands disappeared, and less than 20% of brands notably improve quality of life. People's attachment to brands varies by region.
- Expectations of brands' role in society are growing, with over 70% of people in Western Europe believing brands should help solve social/environmental problems and improve well-being. However, fewer than half feel brands currently meet these expectations.
- A new "Meaningful Brands Index" measures how much brands contribute to people's lives. The top 25 most meaningful global brands are listed, with half being technological brands. Some brands are
This document introduces the BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands report for 2011. It provides an overview of the report, which ranks the 100 most valuable global brands based on quantitative consumer research and financial analysis. New sections this year include commentary on trends influencing brands and brand valuations, as well as in-depth reports on brand development in Brazil, China, and India. Brands are analyzed across 13 sectors and the rankings provide insight for business leaders making strategic decisions.
Global brands allow companies to achieve economies of scale in production and marketing. However, some national brands are better suited to local tastes and cultures. The document discusses the advantages and risks of both global and national brands. It concludes that companies should use global brands where possible but national brands where necessary to adapt to local conditions.
Brandz Report là báo cáo về thương hiệu uy tín thứ 2 trên toàn thế giới (sau BBR của Interbrand) được xuất bản hằng năm.
Đây là báo cáo năm 2014.
Millward Brown hiện là công ty con của WPP.
This document provides an analysis of Estee Lauder Companies' current position, performance, vision, mission, objectives, external environment, internal strengths and weaknesses. It discusses Estee Lauder's 26 brands operating in over 130 countries, growth in different product segments, geographic revenue analysis, and financial performance from 2005-2007. PESTLE, Porter's 5 Forces, and external/internal factor analyses are also included. Recommended strategies are market development, penetration, product development, and forward/backward/horizontal integration.
The document discusses the Global Corporate Reputation Index, which evaluates the reputations of over 6,000 companies based on consumer surveys in 6 countries. It finds that while performance scores are higher than citizenship scores, companies with strong reputations excel at both. Tech companies have the best reputations overall, while oil and gas score lowest. China has the strongest company reputations, while Japan and Brazil are most critical. Long-standing companies tend to have stronger, more durable reputations. The top 25 companies are revealed.
Up 7% BrandZ™ Top 100 Rises 7 percent With growth across categories Year of recovery, refinement and relevance There was a new tone. It fit the new normal. Both brands and consumers adjusted to constant uncertainty and sober expectations about economic growth.
They fit into the calculus of consumption the impact on the natural environment, personal health, and human well being along the supply chain. Shaped by these considerations, brand value appreciated. The value of the BrandZ™ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands rose 7 percent to $2.6 trillion last year, compared with a flat performance a year ago. All but two of the 13 categories analyzed in this report improved in brand value.
Technology and oil and gas declined modestly. These results indicate that strong brands continue to regain value lost during the recession and now, in some cases, surpass their pre-recession levels. The total brand value of the BrandZ™ Top 100 Strong Brands Portfolio has improved 77 percent since 2006. In addition, the BrandZ™ Top 100 Strong Brands Port-folio, comprised of diverse public companies, appreciated 58 percent during that eight-year period, compared with a market value gain of only 23 percent by the S&P 500. Despite a sharp decline in the growth of its brand value last year, Apple remained number one in the BrandZ™ Top 100 ranking, on the strength of the meaningful difference of its brand. Google moved to the number two position, marginally surpassing IBM, which continues to be the world’s most valuable B2B brand. These brands demonstrate both the capacity to grow brand strength quickly (Apple was founded in 1976, Google in 1998) and sustain it over time (IBM celebrated its centennial in 2011).
Three key themes emerge from the BrandZ™ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2013: Recovery The economy continued to improve— not everywhere, but in the US. All categories experienced healthy sales. Refinement With confidence still fragile, brands resisted introducing break-through innovations and instead encouraged consumer spending with incremental product and service improvements.
Relevance Reaching these more reflective consumers required offering products and services that not only projected mass appeal, but also promised personal relevance for the individual. BrandZ™ Portfolio outperforms S&P 500 Over the past seven years, the S&P 500 increased 23 percent in market value. In contrast, the BrandZ™ Portfolio of the strongest brands appreciated 58 percent.
The value of the top 100 global brands, as measured by the BrandZ ranking, grew 7% in the past year. This indicates that strong brands continue recovering value lost during the recession and sometimes surpassing pre-recession levels. Key themes from the report include recovery in the economy and sales, brand refinement through incremental improvements rather than major innovations, and an emphasis on personal relevance for consumers. Financial brands showed strong growth, accounting for 20% of total brand value, reflecting profit rebounds and new initiatives. Food and drink brands saw mixed results depending on category challenges.
This document provides an executive summary of the BrandZ Top 100 Most Powerful Brands Ranking for 2008. It highlights that the total brand value of the Top 100 brands increased 1% from 2007 to $1.94 trillion in 2008, with Google ranked as the most valuable brand. It also notes trends such as the strong performance of technology brands and brands from emerging markets like China. The summary identifies several sectors that experienced high brand value growth such as mobile operators, technology, personal care, and fast food.
BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2014Kantar
The value of the BrandZTM Global Top 100 brands increased 12% in 2014 to $2.9 trillion, marking a shift from economic recovery to growth. All categories rose in brand value led by Apparel, which grew 29% overall. Only 18 brands lost value compared to an average of 31 in previous years since the financial crisis. Growing economies in North America and Europe drove gains as BRIC markets slowed. Google surpassed Apple as the top brand. Tencent and Facebook were the fastest risers. Technology dominated with nearly a third of total value.
It was a year of real growth, but also of disruption and even transformation.
The BrandZ™ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2014 added $310 billion to reach $2.9 trillion in brand value, a 12 percent increase.
Prior to the BrandZ™ Global 2014 results, the Top 100 had increased an average of about 6 percent, $125 billion, annually since the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009.
This year, led by apparel, with a 29 percent overall increase, all categories rose in brand value. And 10 of 14 categories experienced double-digit growth, indicating that brands across the economy have moved beyond recovery into a period of new growth.
Original content here: http://www.millwardbrown.com/brandz/Top_100_Global_Brands.aspx
The value of the BrandZTM Global Top 100 brands increased 12% in 2014 to $2.9 trillion, marking a shift from economic recovery to growth. All categories rose in brand value led by Apparel with a 29% increase. Only 18 brands lost value compared to an average of 31 in previous years since the financial crisis. Growth was driven by resurgent North American and European economies while BRIC markets slowed. Google surpassed Apple as the top brand. Tencent and Facebook were the fastest risers. Technology dominated with nearly a third of total value.
BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands study 2014 - Millward BrownVikrant Mudaliar
The BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands study, commissioned by WPP and conducted by Millward Brown Optimor, is now in its ninth year. It is the only ranking that uses the views of potential and current buyers of a brand, alongside financial data, to calculate brand value.
The combined value of the Top 100 has nearly doubled since the first ranking was produced in 2006. The Top 100 today are worth $2.9 trillion, an increase of 49% compared with the 2008 valuation, which marked the start of the banking and currency crisis.
This document introduces the sixth annual BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands report. It summarizes that the total value of the top 100 brands grew to $2.4 trillion in 2011, up 17% from 2010, faster than the 13% growth in global equity markets. The report ranks brands based on quantitative consumer research and financial analysis from over 2 million consumer interviews. New this year, it includes expert commentary on trends influencing brands like the digital revolution and generational shifts. It also features in-depth reports on brand development in Brazil, China, and India for the first time.
Brandz 100 milward brown 2011
Source & Download:
http://www.millwardbrown.com/BrandZ/Default.aspx
"Developed by Millward Brown Optimor, the BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands ranking analyzes the world’s leading brands and the economic and competitive dynamics that influence value fluctuations. It is the most comprehensive annual ranking of brand value, and focuses on consumer-facing brands, rather than corproate brands.
Millward Brown congratulates all brands in this year’s BrandZ Top 100."
Informe que analiza la reputación de España medida en 23 países en base a más 80.000 valoraciones. Se analizan un total de 17 variables reputacionales de la Marca España.
El documento analiza la crisis de credibilidad y reputación que enfrentan los partidos políticos en España. Explica que los ciudadanos han perdido la confianza en los partidos debido a la corrupción y la contradicción entre sus promesas y acciones. Para recuperar la legitimidad, los partidos necesitan implementar planes a largo plazo para mejorar su reputación basados en la estima, admiración, respeto y confianza de los ciudadanos. Expertos opinan que los partidos deben someterse a análisis de reputación, mod
Este documento resume los conceptos clave de la reputación corporativa y la gestión de la misma. Explica que la reputación se basa en las percepciones de los grupos de interés sobre el pasado y futuro de una empresa. También presenta el modelo RepTrak para medir la reputación a través de indicadores como Pulse. Finalmente, analiza cómo la reputación genera valor económico y cómo las empresas aún están en las primeras etapas de gestionarla de manera estratégica.
En un mundo en el que una empresa con mala reputación puede valer un tercio que una empresa de similares características, pero con una reputación excelente, factores que sólo hace unos cuantos años eran sinónimo de garantía y solidez, como su capacidad de generar cashflow, pueden que en la actualidad no sean más simples parachoques temporales. Incluso no hay que descartar que sus licencias para operar resulten cada vez más difíciles de renovar, sobre todo en un contexto dominado por una opinión frustrada y escéptica, y con el riesgo añadido de políticos populistas deseosos de capitalizar el resentimiento de los consumidores.
Para ayudar a las compañías a navegar en este entorno desafiante y lleno de retos, Reputation Institute realizó, entre diciembre 2011 y abril 2012, una investigación mundial en la que participaron responsables de gestionar la reputación corporativa de sus empresas. Preguntamos a 351 líderes de alto nivel, en 318 de las principales empresas de todo el mundo, cómo se entiende y gestiona la reputación en sus respectivas compañías. Sus respuestas sugieren que, aunque la mayoría de los ejecutivos están de acuerdo en que la reputación es crucial para el éxito del negocio, sólo una minoría ha aprendido a gestionarla de una manera estructurada.
Este documento presenta los resultados del estudio RepTrakTM Pulse España 2012 sobre la reputación de las principales empresas españolas según la opinión del público general. Mercedes-Benz tiene la mejor reputación, seguida de Google y Danone. El estudio evalúa la reputación de 120 empresas en 7 dimensiones e identifica líderes en cada dimensión. Además, analiza la relación entre reputación y comportamientos favorables de los clientes, como la intención de recomendación.
Presentación de Fernando Prado, managing partner de Reputation Institute España, en la ESADE el 15-12-2010, titulada La Reputación de España en el Mundo 2010, con el resultado del estudio anual sobre la reputation Institute sobre la reputación de España.
Este documento presenta información sobre la reputación corporativa. Explica conceptos clave como qué es la reputación corporativa, cómo se mide a través del RepTrak Pulse, y la relación entre la reputación y la responsabilidad social corporativa y la gestión de marca. También resume los resultados del estudio Global Reputation Pulse 2010 sobre las empresas con mejor reputación a nivel mundial.
Informe de Reputation Pulse e Inmark Perú sonbre la reputación corporativa de las principales empresas en Perú. Incluye el top ten de las 10 empresas más reputadas en este país latinoamericano.
Este documento presenta los resultados de un estudio sobre la reputación de España en el mundo realizado por el Instituto de Análisis de Intangibles (IAI) en colaboración con Reputation Institute y patrocinado por BBVA y Ferrovial. El estudio aplica el modelo RepTrak de medición de reputación corporativa a 21 países, evaluando la reputación de España según 9 dimensiones como atractivo natural, cultural, financiero, etc. Los resultados muestran que España tiene una reputación fuerte, especialmente en Europa, aunque existen oportunidades para mejorar en áreas como
El documento presenta los resultados clave del estudio "Global Reputation Pulse 2010" para España. Danone es la empresa líder en reputación en España. Las empresas del sector informático generan mayor confianza, mientras que los sectores bancario y de telecomunicaciones tienen una reputación más débil. Las dimensiones más importantes de la reputación son la oferta de productos y servicios e integridad.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM