This document provides instructions for a 250-word discussion on funding a minority health program. Students are asked to read about how social welfare programs are funded from their textbook, and two articles on non-profit advocacy and bureaucratic disentitlement in social programs. For the discussion, students should consider applying for either a categorical or block grant for a program serving minority groups with certain health issues, subject to means testing. They must justify which type of grant would be better based on the provided readings.

1. [From 10$/Pg] 2 295 –
[From 10$/Pg] 2 295 –250 words ReadingsUse your Social Policy and Social Programs text
to complete the following:Read Chapter 7, “How Do We Pay for Social Welfare Policies and
Programs?” pages 139–157.Use the Capella Library to complete the following:Hasenfeld, Y.,
& Garrow, E. E. (2012). Nonprofit human-service organizations, social rights, and advocacy
in a neoliberal welfare state. Social Service Review, 86(2), 295–322.Lipsky, M. (1984).
Bureaucratic disentitlement in social welfare programs [PDF]. Social Service Review, 3–
27. This article provides historical context.For this discussion, consider the following:You
apply for federal help in funding a program aimed at improving minority health care in
your area. The program serves people of all ages who are suffering from specified ailments,
but has a means testing eligibility requirement that limits aid based on income
level. Investigate which type of grant funding, categorical or block, would be better for this
program, and provide resources to substantiate you choice.Use this unit’s readings to
inform your discussion.