This document discusses the development of a quality letter for evaluating action-research applied to territorial governance. It outlines several objectives for the letter, including reaching consensus on basic principles for action-research processes and protocols. The document then discusses several key aspects of action-research quality, including participation, sustainability, transparency, and co-responsibility. It proposes that the quality letter establish pillars for evaluating the mobilization of territorial resources, knowledge sharing, participatory processes, and management of results. The goal is to provide teams with a self-assessment tool to improve their action-research practices.
ICT to evaluate participation in urban planning: remarks from a case study Fr...Beniamino Murgante
This document discusses evaluating participation in urban planning using information and communication technologies (ICT). It begins with an introduction to the topic and then discusses challenges in evaluating participation. ICT can assist in evaluation by supporting participatory processes through tools like email, online forums and social media. However, evaluation requires identifying the goals of online involvement and perspectives to assess from, such as political, technical or social views. The document then describes a case study from Italy called "PartecipaPUG" before concluding.
Track 4. New publishing and scientific communication ways: Electronic edition, Information metrics and digital educational resources
Authors: Antonio Jose Rodrigues Neto, Maria Manuel Borges and Licinio Roque
This document summarizes the objectives and work packages of the "Axis B" project. The project aims to study territorial job systems, governance frameworks, and social/ecological innovation related to job creation. It involves comparing different European regions and identifying best practices. The project consists of three work packages on: 1) analyzing territorial job systems, 2) evaluating employment governance models, and 3) studying examples of socio-ecological innovation. Each work package contains multiple tasks and will produce synthesis reports on their findings to help inform policymakers. The overall goal is to help territories foster more sustainable job opportunities.
This document summarizes the work of the Plan Integral del Distrito V in Huelva, Spain, which aims to promote social and territorial innovation in its district through a bottom-up collaborative approach. Over the past 10 years, it has brought together over 55 diverse actors to implement projects that meet local needs, improve quality of life, and empower citizens through participatory governance structures. Some of its successes include renovating over 1,400 homes, establishing youth and health programs, and generating social studies. The plan seeks to holistically address challenges through democratic multi-level governance, trust-building networks, and continuous evaluation of its impact on social inclusion.
The document discusses the use of lines and traces in spatial planning and urban design. It defines soft lines as joining different perspectives and horizons through synesthesia, while hard or trace lines contain the weight and materiality of places. Traces reflect light and shadows and call to viewers like prints. The document also examines how lines are used in artistic drawings, architectural plans, and spatial experiences to analyze space and represent the necessary exposure of humans in urbanism.
3C L Apport De La ThéOrie Des Jeux à L Intelligence Te Rritoriale Illustra...Territorial Intelligence
This document discusses using game theory to analyze territorial planning issues. It presents a case study that used game theory to illuminate the transfer of Nantes Atlantique airport. It describes developing three games to model different interactions between players: an airport/airlines game, a regional airport game, and a "Community Game" between Nantes and Rennes. The Community Game modeled cooperation scenarios between the two communities. Experimental play of the Community Game provided results to help guide decision-making around airport cooperation. The document concludes that game theory and reflexive modeling can benefit territorial intelligence by clarifying player preferences and enabling simulations of actor interactions.
The document discusses governance and territorial intelligence in addressing climate change through democratic tools and at varying territorial scales. It outlines three conflicting injunctions to act between democratic participation and action. It also describes a double time calendar to both address climate change in the long term through scenarios and forecasts, as well as short term reactivity. An incomplete democracy is noted around consulting and warning citizens on new issues. Scalar fittings are discussed to communicate, deliberate locally, and improve consistency across policies and plans at different levels. Overall, the document concludes on implementing territorial intelligence to overcome skepticism around policies and build a less conflictual democracy through political aims, technical support, and identifying societal challenges.
ICT to evaluate participation in urban planning: remarks from a case study Fr...Beniamino Murgante
This document discusses evaluating participation in urban planning using information and communication technologies (ICT). It begins with an introduction to the topic and then discusses challenges in evaluating participation. ICT can assist in evaluation by supporting participatory processes through tools like email, online forums and social media. However, evaluation requires identifying the goals of online involvement and perspectives to assess from, such as political, technical or social views. The document then describes a case study from Italy called "PartecipaPUG" before concluding.
Track 4. New publishing and scientific communication ways: Electronic edition, Information metrics and digital educational resources
Authors: Antonio Jose Rodrigues Neto, Maria Manuel Borges and Licinio Roque
This document summarizes the objectives and work packages of the "Axis B" project. The project aims to study territorial job systems, governance frameworks, and social/ecological innovation related to job creation. It involves comparing different European regions and identifying best practices. The project consists of three work packages on: 1) analyzing territorial job systems, 2) evaluating employment governance models, and 3) studying examples of socio-ecological innovation. Each work package contains multiple tasks and will produce synthesis reports on their findings to help inform policymakers. The overall goal is to help territories foster more sustainable job opportunities.
This document summarizes the work of the Plan Integral del Distrito V in Huelva, Spain, which aims to promote social and territorial innovation in its district through a bottom-up collaborative approach. Over the past 10 years, it has brought together over 55 diverse actors to implement projects that meet local needs, improve quality of life, and empower citizens through participatory governance structures. Some of its successes include renovating over 1,400 homes, establishing youth and health programs, and generating social studies. The plan seeks to holistically address challenges through democratic multi-level governance, trust-building networks, and continuous evaluation of its impact on social inclusion.
The document discusses the use of lines and traces in spatial planning and urban design. It defines soft lines as joining different perspectives and horizons through synesthesia, while hard or trace lines contain the weight and materiality of places. Traces reflect light and shadows and call to viewers like prints. The document also examines how lines are used in artistic drawings, architectural plans, and spatial experiences to analyze space and represent the necessary exposure of humans in urbanism.
3C L Apport De La ThéOrie Des Jeux à L Intelligence Te Rritoriale Illustra...Territorial Intelligence
This document discusses using game theory to analyze territorial planning issues. It presents a case study that used game theory to illuminate the transfer of Nantes Atlantique airport. It describes developing three games to model different interactions between players: an airport/airlines game, a regional airport game, and a "Community Game" between Nantes and Rennes. The Community Game modeled cooperation scenarios between the two communities. Experimental play of the Community Game provided results to help guide decision-making around airport cooperation. The document concludes that game theory and reflexive modeling can benefit territorial intelligence by clarifying player preferences and enabling simulations of actor interactions.
The document discusses governance and territorial intelligence in addressing climate change through democratic tools and at varying territorial scales. It outlines three conflicting injunctions to act between democratic participation and action. It also describes a double time calendar to both address climate change in the long term through scenarios and forecasts, as well as short term reactivity. An incomplete democracy is noted around consulting and warning citizens on new issues. Scalar fittings are discussed to communicate, deliberate locally, and improve consistency across policies and plans at different levels. Overall, the document concludes on implementing territorial intelligence to overcome skepticism around policies and build a less conflictual democracy through political aims, technical support, and identifying societal challenges.
This document discusses the objectives and principles of action research favoring territorial governance for sustainable development. The objectives are to reach consensus on basic principles, propose a quality letter, and evaluate projects. The principles discussed include transformation, multidimensionality, partnership, participation, sustainability, transparency, co-responsibility, and co-learning. Participation is identified as a key factor of quality. The document aims to define what constitutes durable, collaborative participation to achieve high quality action research.
This document discusses best practices for engaging end users in research. It recommends starting stakeholder participation early, talking to the right stakeholders, being flexible in methods used, and putting local and scientific knowledge on equal footing. The document also discusses using stakeholder analysis to systematically identify and engage relevant end users. Stakeholder analysis identifies interested parties, their power to influence outcomes, and how they interact. It can help answer questions about how parties can work more effectively together.
Irc@zaragoza urban water cooperation without animationsIRC
The United Nations proclaimed 2013 the International Year of Water Cooperation. IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre supports this focus has a wealth of lesson on improving water cooperation through learning alliances. At the UN Water Conference 2013 in Zaragoza, IRC presented lessons on learning alliances for better water cooperation in SWITCH, a multi-country urban water project.
Knowledge Management in Agricultural Research in the CGIAR and CIAT: lessons ...CIAT
This document summarizes lessons learned from knowledge management and social learning experiences at the CGIAR and CIAT agricultural research centers. It discusses several aspects of knowledge management, including face-to-face interaction, research collaboration, open access, data management, information technologies, and monitoring and evaluation. It also covers social learning aspects like participation, reaching end users, extension versus learning, and taking a systemic focus. The document concludes with recommendations to strengthen knowledge sharing and networking to support collaborative, multidisciplinary agricultural research.
Reflections on monitoring a large-scale civil society WASH initiative: Lesson...IRC
By A/Prof Juliet Willetts, Bruce Bailey, Dr Paul Crawford for the the Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium, 9 - 11 April 2013, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
University of North Carolina talk 28 May 2012Chris Batt
The document discusses the challenges facing knowledge institutions like museums, libraries, and archives in the digital age. It outlines three main areas of focus: 1) environmental changes like new user behaviors and expectations in a digital world, 2) the need for organizational readiness to adopt new technologies and change practices, and 3) the need to update infrastructure and policy frameworks that were designed for the physical collections of the past. The document argues that the existing models and paradigms of knowledge institutions may not be able to successfully accommodate the development of distinctive online services that maximize public value in this new landscape.
This document summarizes a European policy network called KeyCoNet that is focused on identifying and analyzing strategies for implementing key competences in education reforms. It lists the partner organizations involved in KeyCoNet which represent policy, research, and practice in several European countries. The network's goals are to increase its influence on education policies through disseminating its studies, videos, and newsletters. It will identify and analyze emerging strategies for teaching key competences, which are interdependent skills like critical thinking, initiative, problem solving, and cultural awareness. KeyCoNet will engage in literature reviews, case studies, and peer visits to schools to understand how key competences can be effectively implemented and will produce recommendations to share its findings.
This document provides information about the KeyCoNet partners network. It lists partners from various European countries that represent the areas of policy, research, and practice. It then provides the operational definition of key competences that are the focus of the network's activities. Finally, it outlines the network's methodology, which involves identifying and analyzing strategies for implementing key competences in education reforms through case notes, case studies, peer visits, and disseminating the findings.
Presentation to the IEA DSM ExCo of changes to our draft workplan after input from 50+ experts. All proposed changes were accepted in Norway, May 2012.
This document outlines a research strategy to study goat value chain development models in order to generate evidence and lessons learned. It will take a participatory action research approach using innovation platforms and producer hubs to test interventions, monitor changes, and conduct focused studies. Key questions focus on how these models impact practices, market access, and benefits for actors. A hybrid monitoring and evaluation approach using outcome mapping and indicators will track behavioral changes and value chain performance over time.
The two-day workshop focused on water research impact and uptake. On day one, participants discussed who should be engaged, the different timescales of research and policy, and how uptake is more about processes than products. Distributed responsibility and dedicated resources are needed to adequately address impact. Day two covered scientometrics indicators to measure impact, the value of networks for knowledge sharing, and ensuring accountability for uptake across organizations. The workshop highlighted the need to reconcile different stakeholder perspectives on defining and measuring impact while further raising awareness of impact within research institutions.
Do the Software Architects get the Needed Support for the job They Perform?Kresimir Popovic
In this paper, we report on two year case study
research in a software development organization which
includes more than 20 architects of different social profile,
knowledge and time zone locations. During that time, we built
up understanding on how to support software architects in
knowledge codification (converting human expertise to
organized, categorized, indexed, easily accessible knowledge in
a knowledge base form available for the organizational
members). By following an action research cycle, we first
diagnosed the architecting process of this organization and
proposed solutions for identified problems. The revelations
gained over the past two years have resulted in creation of a
theoretical instruction framework of what software architects
do and what support they need.
This document proposes a South-South collaboration called CESSAF between the Asian subcontinent and Africa to share knowledge on sustainable urban living. It discusses establishing the PEI-Science, Technology, and Resource Centre in New Delhi to facilitate knowledge sharing activities between partner institutions. This would include joint research, training programs, student and faculty exchanges to build capacity and further sustainable development goals in both regions.
This document outlines the essential elements of implementing an innovation platform (IP) for agricultural research and development. It discusses the purpose of establishing an IP, which is to effectively link research to development through multi-stakeholder engagement. Key elements that are described include identifying stakeholders and their roles, selecting entry points for the IP, evaluating the outcomes and impact of the IP, integrating related research activities, and designating resources for facilitation and implementation.
This document presents a framework for evaluating health IT projects. It consists of several components: [1] A project structure template to guide planning, preparation, evaluation, and dissemination of results. [2] Multidimensional evaluation methods that assess both qualitative and quantitative outcomes across technical, clinical, and organizational areas. [3] Criteria pools for selecting evaluation measures. [4] Guidelines for confidentiality, analysis, and reporting of results. The goal is to provide consistent, high-quality evaluation that identifies benefits and areas for improvement to inform future health IT implementations.
Programme planning and evaluation in extension workDegonto Islam
Programme is the total educational job being done in particular settings that forms the basis for extension plan. Programme planning is decision making process which actually analysis the existing condition and matter and evaluation the alternative approach to solve the crux with priorities of the human feeling and needs. Generally initial objectives are peoples participations at grass roots level.
This document outlines the essential elements of implementing an innovation platform (IP) for linking research to development in dry areas. The key elements discussed include:
- The purpose of the IP is to engage stakeholders and facilitate dialogue to effectively generate and disseminate agricultural research and development.
- Entry points should initially focus on relatively easy, relevant options to build early success and trust.
- The main output is a demonstration of the principles of multi-stakeholder engagement increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of research.
- Expected outcomes include greater adoption of options by communities as well as improvements to delivery systems through adoption by national development programs.
Lessons on sector learning with WASH Resource Centre NetworksIRC
Continuous joint learning is crucial for a strong and adaptive water and sanitation sector. In the past 2 years, we have been reflecting on the ways in which national Water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) Resource Centre Networks (RCN) support learning in their WASH sectors.
IRC and RCN coordinators in 5 countries have been sharing experiences and gathering evidence of change that result from learning between organisations and at sector level. See http://www.irc.nl/page/50054
Présentation d'une communication qui prend du recul sur une activité menée par la Scop Acokima, plus précisément par ma collègue Samira OULD-BOUZIAN et moi-même : nous accompagnons la Communauté de Communes de la Plaine Dijonnaise à co-construire son Projet de Territoire, selon une méthode innovante inspirée de Catalyse.
La communauté de communes des Plaines de Dijon (en Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France, dont l’acronyme usuel est CCPD) s’interroge sur ces points, et a décidé de s’engager dans la rédaction d’un document d’orientation politique important : le Projet de Territoire.
Dans une double posture d’accompagnement méthodologique et de recherche-action, cette collectivité nous a demandé d’inventer ensemble la conception et l’écriture collective de ce projet de territoire qui s’apparente à un guide pour l’action publique locale, à une feuille de route opérationnelle adoptée par les élus communautaires.
Nous avons alors imaginé une recherche action faisant appel à la méthodologie Catalyse® (inti.hypotheses.org), structurant une intelligence collective territoriale innovante pour ce territoire. Il s’agit de confronter la vision des élus, des agents, des citoyens et des acteurs locaux du territoire dans deux dimensions : quelle perception de la CCPD expriment-ils individuellement et collectivement ? Quelles projections peuvent-ils imaginer pour les 15 ou 20 ans à venir ? Quels éléments envisagent-ils pour s’accorder sur un projet de territoire commun ? Comment en hiérarchiser les éléments dans l’optique de la transition socio-écologique ?
Dans cette communication, nous nous attacherons à présenter le contexte de la recherche action, la méthodologie imaginée et expérimentée, ainsi que les premiers résultats, puisque le dispositif se terminera au printemps prochain.
Organisé par les laboratoire Sic.lab (Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication) et le GRM (Sciences de Gestion), un workshop a eu lieu à la MSH de Nice le vendredi 29 juin 2018, rassemblant praticiens et universitaires autour d’une problématique commune : les « Pratiques collaboratives et réseaux d’acteurs dans les territoires ».
Cette problématique se décline en trois axes :
1er axe : Gouvernance et réseaux : réseaux d’acteurs de l’innovation, réseaux numériques, pratiques collaboratives,
2ème axe : Identité et valorisation des territoires : esthétique, design, patrimoine et communication
3ème axe Gestion de projets territoriaux : mise en œuvre, engagement des parties prenantes, organisation collaborative.
L'objectif était de présenter une vision SIC de l’intelligence collective territoriale.
More Related Content
Similar to ITGO Quality letter presentation-Miedes
This document discusses the objectives and principles of action research favoring territorial governance for sustainable development. The objectives are to reach consensus on basic principles, propose a quality letter, and evaluate projects. The principles discussed include transformation, multidimensionality, partnership, participation, sustainability, transparency, co-responsibility, and co-learning. Participation is identified as a key factor of quality. The document aims to define what constitutes durable, collaborative participation to achieve high quality action research.
This document discusses best practices for engaging end users in research. It recommends starting stakeholder participation early, talking to the right stakeholders, being flexible in methods used, and putting local and scientific knowledge on equal footing. The document also discusses using stakeholder analysis to systematically identify and engage relevant end users. Stakeholder analysis identifies interested parties, their power to influence outcomes, and how they interact. It can help answer questions about how parties can work more effectively together.
Irc@zaragoza urban water cooperation without animationsIRC
The United Nations proclaimed 2013 the International Year of Water Cooperation. IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre supports this focus has a wealth of lesson on improving water cooperation through learning alliances. At the UN Water Conference 2013 in Zaragoza, IRC presented lessons on learning alliances for better water cooperation in SWITCH, a multi-country urban water project.
Knowledge Management in Agricultural Research in the CGIAR and CIAT: lessons ...CIAT
This document summarizes lessons learned from knowledge management and social learning experiences at the CGIAR and CIAT agricultural research centers. It discusses several aspects of knowledge management, including face-to-face interaction, research collaboration, open access, data management, information technologies, and monitoring and evaluation. It also covers social learning aspects like participation, reaching end users, extension versus learning, and taking a systemic focus. The document concludes with recommendations to strengthen knowledge sharing and networking to support collaborative, multidisciplinary agricultural research.
Reflections on monitoring a large-scale civil society WASH initiative: Lesson...IRC
By A/Prof Juliet Willetts, Bruce Bailey, Dr Paul Crawford for the the Monitoring Sustainable WASH Service Delivery Symposium, 9 - 11 April 2013, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
University of North Carolina talk 28 May 2012Chris Batt
The document discusses the challenges facing knowledge institutions like museums, libraries, and archives in the digital age. It outlines three main areas of focus: 1) environmental changes like new user behaviors and expectations in a digital world, 2) the need for organizational readiness to adopt new technologies and change practices, and 3) the need to update infrastructure and policy frameworks that were designed for the physical collections of the past. The document argues that the existing models and paradigms of knowledge institutions may not be able to successfully accommodate the development of distinctive online services that maximize public value in this new landscape.
This document summarizes a European policy network called KeyCoNet that is focused on identifying and analyzing strategies for implementing key competences in education reforms. It lists the partner organizations involved in KeyCoNet which represent policy, research, and practice in several European countries. The network's goals are to increase its influence on education policies through disseminating its studies, videos, and newsletters. It will identify and analyze emerging strategies for teaching key competences, which are interdependent skills like critical thinking, initiative, problem solving, and cultural awareness. KeyCoNet will engage in literature reviews, case studies, and peer visits to schools to understand how key competences can be effectively implemented and will produce recommendations to share its findings.
This document provides information about the KeyCoNet partners network. It lists partners from various European countries that represent the areas of policy, research, and practice. It then provides the operational definition of key competences that are the focus of the network's activities. Finally, it outlines the network's methodology, which involves identifying and analyzing strategies for implementing key competences in education reforms through case notes, case studies, peer visits, and disseminating the findings.
Presentation to the IEA DSM ExCo of changes to our draft workplan after input from 50+ experts. All proposed changes were accepted in Norway, May 2012.
This document outlines a research strategy to study goat value chain development models in order to generate evidence and lessons learned. It will take a participatory action research approach using innovation platforms and producer hubs to test interventions, monitor changes, and conduct focused studies. Key questions focus on how these models impact practices, market access, and benefits for actors. A hybrid monitoring and evaluation approach using outcome mapping and indicators will track behavioral changes and value chain performance over time.
The two-day workshop focused on water research impact and uptake. On day one, participants discussed who should be engaged, the different timescales of research and policy, and how uptake is more about processes than products. Distributed responsibility and dedicated resources are needed to adequately address impact. Day two covered scientometrics indicators to measure impact, the value of networks for knowledge sharing, and ensuring accountability for uptake across organizations. The workshop highlighted the need to reconcile different stakeholder perspectives on defining and measuring impact while further raising awareness of impact within research institutions.
Do the Software Architects get the Needed Support for the job They Perform?Kresimir Popovic
In this paper, we report on two year case study
research in a software development organization which
includes more than 20 architects of different social profile,
knowledge and time zone locations. During that time, we built
up understanding on how to support software architects in
knowledge codification (converting human expertise to
organized, categorized, indexed, easily accessible knowledge in
a knowledge base form available for the organizational
members). By following an action research cycle, we first
diagnosed the architecting process of this organization and
proposed solutions for identified problems. The revelations
gained over the past two years have resulted in creation of a
theoretical instruction framework of what software architects
do and what support they need.
This document proposes a South-South collaboration called CESSAF between the Asian subcontinent and Africa to share knowledge on sustainable urban living. It discusses establishing the PEI-Science, Technology, and Resource Centre in New Delhi to facilitate knowledge sharing activities between partner institutions. This would include joint research, training programs, student and faculty exchanges to build capacity and further sustainable development goals in both regions.
This document outlines the essential elements of implementing an innovation platform (IP) for agricultural research and development. It discusses the purpose of establishing an IP, which is to effectively link research to development through multi-stakeholder engagement. Key elements that are described include identifying stakeholders and their roles, selecting entry points for the IP, evaluating the outcomes and impact of the IP, integrating related research activities, and designating resources for facilitation and implementation.
This document presents a framework for evaluating health IT projects. It consists of several components: [1] A project structure template to guide planning, preparation, evaluation, and dissemination of results. [2] Multidimensional evaluation methods that assess both qualitative and quantitative outcomes across technical, clinical, and organizational areas. [3] Criteria pools for selecting evaluation measures. [4] Guidelines for confidentiality, analysis, and reporting of results. The goal is to provide consistent, high-quality evaluation that identifies benefits and areas for improvement to inform future health IT implementations.
Programme planning and evaluation in extension workDegonto Islam
Programme is the total educational job being done in particular settings that forms the basis for extension plan. Programme planning is decision making process which actually analysis the existing condition and matter and evaluation the alternative approach to solve the crux with priorities of the human feeling and needs. Generally initial objectives are peoples participations at grass roots level.
This document outlines the essential elements of implementing an innovation platform (IP) for linking research to development in dry areas. The key elements discussed include:
- The purpose of the IP is to engage stakeholders and facilitate dialogue to effectively generate and disseminate agricultural research and development.
- Entry points should initially focus on relatively easy, relevant options to build early success and trust.
- The main output is a demonstration of the principles of multi-stakeholder engagement increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of research.
- Expected outcomes include greater adoption of options by communities as well as improvements to delivery systems through adoption by national development programs.
Lessons on sector learning with WASH Resource Centre NetworksIRC
Continuous joint learning is crucial for a strong and adaptive water and sanitation sector. In the past 2 years, we have been reflecting on the ways in which national Water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) Resource Centre Networks (RCN) support learning in their WASH sectors.
IRC and RCN coordinators in 5 countries have been sharing experiences and gathering evidence of change that result from learning between organisations and at sector level. See http://www.irc.nl/page/50054
Similar to ITGO Quality letter presentation-Miedes (20)
Présentation d'une communication qui prend du recul sur une activité menée par la Scop Acokima, plus précisément par ma collègue Samira OULD-BOUZIAN et moi-même : nous accompagnons la Communauté de Communes de la Plaine Dijonnaise à co-construire son Projet de Territoire, selon une méthode innovante inspirée de Catalyse.
La communauté de communes des Plaines de Dijon (en Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France, dont l’acronyme usuel est CCPD) s’interroge sur ces points, et a décidé de s’engager dans la rédaction d’un document d’orientation politique important : le Projet de Territoire.
Dans une double posture d’accompagnement méthodologique et de recherche-action, cette collectivité nous a demandé d’inventer ensemble la conception et l’écriture collective de ce projet de territoire qui s’apparente à un guide pour l’action publique locale, à une feuille de route opérationnelle adoptée par les élus communautaires.
Nous avons alors imaginé une recherche action faisant appel à la méthodologie Catalyse® (inti.hypotheses.org), structurant une intelligence collective territoriale innovante pour ce territoire. Il s’agit de confronter la vision des élus, des agents, des citoyens et des acteurs locaux du territoire dans deux dimensions : quelle perception de la CCPD expriment-ils individuellement et collectivement ? Quelles projections peuvent-ils imaginer pour les 15 ou 20 ans à venir ? Quels éléments envisagent-ils pour s’accorder sur un projet de territoire commun ? Comment en hiérarchiser les éléments dans l’optique de la transition socio-écologique ?
Dans cette communication, nous nous attacherons à présenter le contexte de la recherche action, la méthodologie imaginée et expérimentée, ainsi que les premiers résultats, puisque le dispositif se terminera au printemps prochain.
Organisé par les laboratoire Sic.lab (Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication) et le GRM (Sciences de Gestion), un workshop a eu lieu à la MSH de Nice le vendredi 29 juin 2018, rassemblant praticiens et universitaires autour d’une problématique commune : les « Pratiques collaboratives et réseaux d’acteurs dans les territoires ».
Cette problématique se décline en trois axes :
1er axe : Gouvernance et réseaux : réseaux d’acteurs de l’innovation, réseaux numériques, pratiques collaboratives,
2ème axe : Identité et valorisation des territoires : esthétique, design, patrimoine et communication
3ème axe Gestion de projets territoriaux : mise en œuvre, engagement des parties prenantes, organisation collaborative.
L'objectif était de présenter une vision SIC de l’intelligence collective territoriale.
De nombreux outils de diffusion de données territoriales existent. Chaque jour, de nouveaux indicateurs de plus en plus fins sont développés et mis à disposition du public comme des décideurs locaux. Ces données et indicateurs sont diffusés via différents portails internet dont l’appropriation par les acteurs est à ce jour difficilement quantifiée et qualifiée. Une étude conjointe entre le Commissariat Général à l’Égalité des Territoires (www.cget.gouv.fr) et le laboratoire CIMEOS – MSH de Dijon, de l’Univ. de Bourgogne Franche-Comté a été lancée en 2016 afin de construire une vision concertée de l’utilisation pratique par les territoires des connaissances produites nationalement, afin d’en comprendre l’impact, d’en évaluer la prégnance dans la construction des politiques publiques au niveau local comme national. Comment des démarches de diagnostic et d’observation s’inscrivent par exemple dans des dynamiques d’intelligence territoriale actées par les acteurs locaux ?
Dans un contexte de quartiers dits « prioritaires », amenés à se transformer au gré des innovations sociales, l’intérêt est ici de comprendre comment les acteurs se sont approprié des outils d’observation du territoire pour affiner leurs stratégies et améliorer la qualité de leurs actions.
Notre enquête, menée auprès d’élus, d’associatifs, de bureaux d’études, comme de producteurs et diffuseurs de données, permet d’éclairer de nouveaux modes de communication organisationnelle. Ce projet, revêtant la forme d’une recherche-action, s’intéresse dans un second volet à la production d’indicateurs par et pour les parties prenantes d’un territoire, à leur implication en amont de la réflexion et de la définition des besoins. Il questionne donc les acteurs sur l’organisation, la production et l’usage des informations territoriales. La méthodologie adoptée combine une enquête par entretiens semi-directifs, de l’analyse des contenus et des discours, et de la veille informationnelle territoriale.
L’analyse des entretiens porte sur la perception des acteurs territoriaux de l’utilisation des données socio-économiques, des indicateurs, et de leur transformation en actions concrètes. Les résultats qui en découlent serviront à la rationalisation des pratiques dans une démarche socio-pragmatique, tournée vers des réalisations s’inscrivant dans la transition socio-écologique.
J'ai été invité par Jean Tkaczuk, président du CCRRDT (Comité consultatif de la Recherche et du Développement Technologique) de la Région Occitanie, et Béatrice Vacher, éminente collègue locale (Mines Albi), à participer au séminaire "Construire une culture cohérente" organisé à Castres, pour y présenter les recherches actuelles en Intelligence Territoriale, au sein du réseau INTI (http://inti.hypotheses.org/), et plus particulièrement la méthode Catalyse (http://www.acokima.org/savoir-faire/la-methode-catalyse/).
Inti17-Usages électoraux des outils numériques marketing-Philippe HaagTerritorial Intelligence
Usages électoraux des outils numériques marketing : nouvelle étape de la marchandisation du politique ? Philippe Haag, doctorant (dris. O. Galibert & C. Masselot)
Este documento describe un proyecto de investigación-acción-participativa llevado a cabo por investigadores de la UNLP y el CONICET en Argentina. El proyecto involucra a más de 20 investigadores, estudiantes y organizaciones sociales que trabajan en tres "mesas de trabajo" para abordar problemas sociales y ambientales a través de la inteligencia territorial. Los objetivos incluyen mejorar las condiciones ambientales y reducir la contaminación alrededor de una refinería, así como mejorar asentamientos precarios e identificar usos de tierras desocupadas
INTI17-GirardotJJ-Emergencia y perspectivas del concepto de inteligencia terr...Territorial Intelligence
Este documento presenta una introducción al concepto de inteligencia territorial y su desarrollo dentro de la Red Internacional de Inteligencia Territorial (INTI). Explica que la inteligencia territorial surgió de investigaciones multidisciplinarias y del método Catalyse, desarrollado en los años 80-90. También describe los principales hitos en la formalización del concepto y la red INTI, incluyendo proyectos europeos desde 2002, la definición concertada en 2012, y los ejes de investigación establecidos en 2014. El objetivo final es promover un desar
El documento discute la necesidad de un enfoque territorial participativo y de desarrollo para la investigación científica y política. Propone que la conciencia de clase y lugar son condiciones vitales para la praxis científica a través de la investigación-acción participativa. El desarrollo territorial debe valorizar las identidades locales, la participación comunitaria y las prácticas agroecológicas.
Résilience d’un quartier populaire : enjeux d’un community management territorial. Retour sur expérience : programme Mocida, quartier de Fontaine d'Ouche, Dijon (Bourgogne, France). Comment mobiliser les citoyens aux comportements éco-responsables ? Cyril Masselot
Présentation de Noémie Fiore, Chargée de Communication pour l’ASBL Monceau-Fontaines, lors de la visite du Pôle d'Economie Sociale du CPAS de Charleroi lors de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161125 Données territoriales en ESS - entre usages et co-constructio...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Cyril MASSELOT, Stéphane DJAHANCHACHI (Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté), dans l'Atelier 16 "Intelligence collective et développement des territoires" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161125 Quelle intelligence collective autour des coopérations inter...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Rudy CLAUDOT (CESW), Alexandre MOINE (Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté), "Quelle intelligence collective autour des coopérations intercommunales ? Le cas de la wallonie (Belgique)", dans l'Atelier 16 "Intelligence collective et développement des territoires" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
Présentation de Caroline RENOUPREZ, Atout Ei, "Les entreprises d’insertion", dans l'Atelier 15 "Entrepreneuriat social et coopératif-Scop" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161125 Febecoop - Fondamentaux et enjeux actuels de l’entrepreneuria...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Stéphane BOULANGER, Febecoop, "Fondamentaux et enjeux actuels de l’entrepreneuriat coopératif", dans l'Atelier 15 "Entrepreneuriat social et coopératif-Scop" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161124 La ségrégation professionnelle selon le genre dans l'ESS - ...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Blanca MIEDES UGARTE, Celia SANCHEZ LOPEZ, Manuela A. FERNANDEZ BORRERO (Univ. de Huelva), "La ségrégation professionnelle selon le genre dans l'ESS : le cas des entreprises espagnoles insertion", dans l'Atelier 14 "Economie Sociale et Solidaire et Genre" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161124 Les initiatives féminines dans les économies sociales et so...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Giovanna TRUDA (Univ. de Salerno, Italie), "Les initiatives féminines dans les économies sociales et solidaires et leur implémentations dans le territoire. Une comparaison internationale", dans l'Atelier 14 "Economie Sociale et Solidaire et Genre" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161124 Les initiatives féminines dans les économies sociales et so...
ITGO Quality letter presentation-Miedes
1. CaENTI quality letter on action-research
WP5-CAENTI discussion
Dr. Blanca Miedes Ugarte
Associated Professor of Applied Economy
Observatorio Local de Empleo
www.ole.uhu.es
Universidad de Huelva (Spain)
miedes@uhu.es
Research-Action Line “Governance”
European Network of Territorial Intelligence
www.territorial-intelligence.eu
2. Particular aspects of CAENTI research action
processes:
1. Territorial focus (actors’ needs).
2. Multidimensionality (sectors, disciplines).
3. Mix qualitative and qualitative analysis (methodological
rigorousness).
4. TICs more than a single mean, central tools.
5. Territorial pedagogy.
6. Long term projects.
7. Participation involve all levels not only institutional heads.
8. Balanced relationship researchers-actors.
2
3. WP5 Objectives.
First year Objective:
• To reach a consensus on the formulation of a series of basic principles
the members think they should be observed by the protocols of Action-
Research applied to territorial development, in such a way that the processes
and results of the research allow promoting good governance.
Second year Objective:
• The issue of specific protocols has been tackled by drawing up the
proposal of a quality letter for Action-Research applied to territorial
governance of sustainable development.
Third year Objective:
• Catalogues and video.
• Analysis of CAENTI A-R regarding the quality letter (wp6u)
3
4. CONTEXT CAENTI research action
-Sustainable Development as a multidimensional experience
issue.
- Action-Research as a link between territorial
- Political decentralization and emergence of intelligence and governance.
territorial projects.
- Principles of A-R favoring territorial governance of
- Higher complexity of territorial decision-making, sustainable development:
formal and informal networks: territorial
• Transformation, Multidimensionality, Partnership,
governance.
Participation, Sustainability, Transparence, Co-
- Knowledge Society as a Learning Society. responsibility, Co-learning, Co-evaluation.
- ICT’s as a development key factor.
- Participation as an Action-Research key factor.
Reflection on the Quality of Action-Research
Quality criteria
Participation as a key factor of quality
What partipation process is made of?
Pillars of participation
4
5. Principles
Transformation: it is an implicit principle in the research-action
concept; it consists in fostering the transformer role that research can
performed on social reality. Social needs as departing point.
Multidimensionality: focussing research object using a
multidimensional and multisectorial well balanced approach.
Partnership: fostering and involving territorial partnerships in the
research-action processes.
Participation: assuring that territorial actors’ participation (those
who are directly confronted with territorial problems) is carried out in an
effective way.
5
6. Principles
Sustainability: it consists in carrying out long term action-research
processes which are needed to obtain a more evolutionary knowledge in order to
generate sustainable territorial development dynamics.
Transparency: the research-action processes must lead to a higher
transparency of the results regarding to both knowledge and policies, facilitating
and democratizing the processes of decisions making.
Co-responsibility: the component “action” and the component “research”
are equally responsible for the evolution of the process.
Co-learning: the research-action processes must facilitate the cooperative
learning of all the participants, improving the capacity of the territorial system to
look for solutions to the future problems keeping in mind their past experience. In
other words, they ought to strengthen the development of the territorial intelligence.
6
7. Quality?
Quality criteria
Outcome :
•Better knowledge of territorial dynamics (theory, models,
indicators) and research methods appropriate to territorial
features and dynamics. Territorial
•Ability of Action-Research project to originate a territorial Actors
action which are more adjusted to the inhabitants’ real
needs.
Empowerment
Process:
Better ability to mobilise and mutualise the
territorial actors’ competences in the long term.
7
8. Quality
Durable
Collaborative
Participation
How to construct this DCP? 8
9. CaENTI Quality Letter Pillars.
PILLAR 1: PILLAR 2:
Territorial Resources Mobilisation Knowledge and Abilities Mutualisation
- Research on the target territory’s resources - Multidimensionality of Action-Research.
(knowledge and actors mapping).
- Co-learning.
- Organising actors/researchers
partnerships.
Durable
Collaborative
Participation
PILLAR 3: PILLAR 4:
Participants’ Responsibleness Common Mastery of Results
- Organisation of collaborative management - Continuous assessment of Action-Research
of the project. impacts on territory.
- Deontology and autonomy of participants. - Durability of developed actions.
9
10. DURABLE COLLABORATIVE PARTICIPATION ADDED VALUES.
ICTS:
- Information gathering, manage and use of
information.
- Communication easiness.
- Generation of virtual working spaces.
Added Values
- Action-Research representativeness within
territory.
- Generation of trustable networks.
- Mutual learning between action and research
fields.
- Introduction of continuous systemic assessment
in territorial action.
- Reorient research objectives in terms of
territorial needs.
- Valorisation and recognition of social action
and research. 10
11. Huelva debate
• The quality letter is a proposal which takes as its
reference an ideal (Balanced) model of territorial
action-research project was raised.
• Most real projects do not have a comprehensive nature, nor
are the processes that originate them as linear as the reading
of the letter may intend.
• Thus, the letter is a set of general guidelines and
recommendations for actors and investigators to approach
participatory processes from a global perspective.
• Its application must be oriented by the participants in action-
research projects to the specific characteristics of each case.
11
12. Huelva debate
• Two crucial questions:
– Quality may be assessed, giving rise to the
corresponding plan of improvements to feedback the
process.
– Its an instrument thought for the teams’ internal
use, as a reference for self-assessment, It not might be
used in a decontextualised way by external funders.
12
13. After Huelva
• A self-assessment template on the quality of
participatory processes in territorial action-
research projects was elaborated (UHU and
UFC).
• Participative process of vatuation by CaENTI
wp5 teams.
13
14. Steps for implementation
a) Choice of work team responsible for quality and planning.
– Equilibrated composition
– Awareness about needed resources (time).
b) Adaptation of the template to the specific features of the
action-research project.
– More research oriented or more action oriented.
– Context.
14
15. Content
• The template is made up, firstly, of a number
of statements
related with the achievement of activities performed in
the project which are directly involved in quality
improvement. The statements have been arranged around the four
pillars.
• The teams must show to what extent they agree with the statements
included in the template, which are always written indicating that each
activity has been performed correctly.
– They can value from 1 (“totally disagree with the statement”, therefore,
the worst with respect to the project quality) to 5 (“totally agree with the
statement”, therefore, the best with respect to the project quality).
• It is important is that the final valuation reflected in the template will be the
result of agreement.
15
16. REFLECTION GRID ABOUT THE PARTICIPATIVE PROCESS IN ACTION -RESEARCH
Please, cross the section considering the degree of agreement of the group with each expression. If
possible, please, specify the objective elements or circumstances (evidences) that you have considered
in your valuation.
(5 means “we totally agree”, 1 means “we totally disagree”).
Pillar 1. Mobilization of the territorial actors and resources.
Objective 1.a. Investigation of the target territory’s actors and resources.
Mean 1.a.1: Compilation and analysis of existing documents and data Aspects in which
(scientific and technical, political, legal, etc.) on the target problems. 1 2 3 4 5 valuation is
based
The documentation used to define the project of action -research is
sufficient (considering quantity and quality) to give a global initial vision
of the target problems. It is based on coherent theoretical grounds.
The documentation used to define the project of action -research is
sufficient to give an historical perspective of the target problems.
The diversity and quality of documentary sources allows the main
dimensions of the object of action-research to be considered, and to
build a theoretical framework of the links between them.
The documentation has been jointly analyzed by all the project promoter
team.
16
17. Content
• It is not an instrument for quantitative but rather for
qualitative analysis.
• A the second element of the template is another box,
arranged by pillars identifying main strengths and
weaknesses of the project.
• Once the self-assessment has been completed, the team may
decide to submit the results of the opinion to an external
committee .
• The idea is that the instrument can feed the reflexive process
of the action research teams on their own practice.
17
18. CONCLUSIONS and AUTOASSESMENT
Pillar 1. Mobilization of the territorial actors and resources.
(Name those aspects of the project which have the better performance)
Main Strengths
Describe
Positive effects
of these
Strengths
Main (Name those aspects of the project which have the worst performance)
Weakness
Describe
Negative
effects of these
Weakness
Improvement Result
Objective Responsible Deadline
Actions indicators
Name Action 1. 1
Name Action 1. 2
Name Action 1. 3
….
18
20. QL enhances EFQM main principles
• Direction towards results.
• Direction to the “client”.
• Leadership.
• Management by processes.
• Development and implication of people.
• Continuous process of learning and improvement.
• Development of alliances.
• Social responsibility of the organization.
20
21. CaENTI quality letter on action-research
WP5-CAENTI discussion
Gracias Dr. Blanca Miedes Ugarte
Associated Professor of Applied Economy
Observatorio Local de Empleo
www.ole.uhu.es
Universidad de Huelva (Spain)
miedes@uhu.es
Research-Action Line “Governance”
European Network of Territorial Intelligence
www.territorial-intelligence.eu
22. Work
Activities
Job
Prospects
Quality Social
Life Innovation
Systems Gouvernance
Education, new Info-com: new
culture, work cultural models
Dissemination
Nantes 2010 22
23. Work
concept
Job
Prospects
Quality Social
Life Territorial Innovation
Job
Systems Gouvernance
Education, new culture, work
Info-com: new cultural models
Dissemination
Nantes 2010 23