This document discusses the history and purpose of the Malaysian Evidence Act 1950. It was modeled after the Indian Evidence Act of 1872, which codified English common law rules of evidence. The Act aims to regulate the presentation of facts in court proceedings to ensure justice and fair trials. It defines evidence as oral statements by witnesses and documentary evidence. Evidence must relate to facts in issue or other relevant facts as defined in the Act. Relevant facts are those that are logically connected or probative to matters requiring proof, subject to exclusionary rules like hearsay. The document also discusses types of evidence and the distinction between facts in issue in civil and criminal cases.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Non expert opinion is not covered yeah:)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Relevancy of evidence under Section 6 of Evidence Act 1950Intan Muhammad
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Non expert opinion is not covered yeah:)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Relevancy of evidence under Section 6 of Evidence Act 1950Intan Muhammad
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
The contents are listed in the 1st page of the note :) credit goes to Dr Munzil for the amazing comprehensive notes, I just added / rearranged few parts to ease my understanding.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves everyday, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
CONTOH MOOTING OLEH PELAJAR TAHUN AKHIR DI UUMASMAH CHE WAN
Appeal on criminal case which is a rape case. we are acting on behalf of appellant (accused). This case was based on real situation in the case of Azahan bin Aminallah v PP.
This is a comparative study on the concept of illegally obtained evidence between Malaysia, United Kingdom, United States of America and the concept from Islamic Perspective.
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
The contents are listed in the 1st page of the note :) credit goes to Dr Munzil for the amazing comprehensive notes, I just added / rearranged few parts to ease my understanding.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves everyday, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
CONTOH MOOTING OLEH PELAJAR TAHUN AKHIR DI UUMASMAH CHE WAN
Appeal on criminal case which is a rape case. we are acting on behalf of appellant (accused). This case was based on real situation in the case of Azahan bin Aminallah v PP.
This is a comparative study on the concept of illegally obtained evidence between Malaysia, United Kingdom, United States of America and the concept from Islamic Perspective.
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
This is own research on the questions for tutorial 1 which consists of three questions that is relating to the introduction of the evidence as well as the evidence law.
Relevancy of evidence under Section 5 of Evidence Act1950Intan Muhammad
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
An Analysis on the Probative Value of Evidence: A Reviewiosrjce
IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science is a double blind peer reviewed International Journal edited by International Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR).The Journal provides a common forum where all aspects of humanities and social sciences are presented. IOSR-JHSS publishes original papers, review papers, conceptual framework, analytical and simulation models, case studies, empirical research, technical notes etc.
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF EVIDENCE
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
Appreciation of evidence and Types of Witness.pptxsrikarna235
Admissibility of Evidence
Types of Witness
Accomplice
Witness Protection Scheme
Police Witness
Admissibility of Admission and Confession
Difference between S.123 & S.124
Burden of Proof
Lecture 2: Preliminary Aspects of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872Badrinath Srinivasan
This lecture is a part of the lecture series intended to help advocates from Tamil Nadu write the All India Bar Exam . The lecture deals with the preliminary portions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The audio of the lecture can be accessed from here: https://bit.ly/2IW7n6D and the video can be seen at this page: https://youtu.be/NqWMY2EYabs
California Discovery Law: Why Requests for Production of Documents may not be...Scott A McMillan
Under California Discovery Law, requests for production of documents and special interrogatories serve separate purposes. It is improper to pose document requests in contention form.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
2. History of Act
• The Evidence Act 1950 is the main source of the law
of evidence in Malaysia. The Evidence Act 1950 is
modeled on the Indian Evidence Act which is a
codified form of English Law.
• Per Thomson CJ (as he then was) in Looi Wooi
Saik v PP [1962] MLJ 337, 339 (CA) stated:
“In this country the question is governed by the terms
of the Evidence Ordinance which is the same as the
Indian Evidence Act…It is generally accepted that
the Indian Act was drafted by Sir James Stephen in
1872 with the intention of stating in a codified form
of English law relating to evidence as it stood at that
date”.
• The Indian Evidence Act, originally passed by the
British parliament in 1872, contains a set of rules
and allied issues governing admissibility of any
evidence in the Indian courts of law.
Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, (March 3,
1829 - March 11, 1894
3. Purpose of rules of evidence
• Sharma J in PP v Sanassi [1970] 2 MLJ 198 provides the
purposes of the law of evidence are:
• To regulate the proving of facts in judicial proceedings so
that the relevant substantive law can be applied to proved
facts.
• To ensure justice by providing for set of rules so that cases
are treated alike where the rules of evidence are concerned.
• To limit or restrict the investigations made by the courts
within the bounds prescribed by general convenience. In
other words, to limit the evidence to materials facts and not
to waste time discussing issues, which are too remote or
which would raise multiplicity of issues.
• To ensure the tendering of the best evidence possible.
• To protect the accused as well as the public and to ensure a
fair trial.
4. Law of Evidence: Is It Substantive or
Adjective?
• In all lawsuits involving Conflict of Laws, questions
of procedure as opposed to substance are always
determined by the lex fori, i.e. the law of the state in
which the case is being litigated.
• All questions of evidence to determine the
admissibility and probative value of evidence and
whether a witness is competent, are dealt with under
the lex fori. Foreigners are tried to our procedure and
law of evidence.
• See Bain v. Whitehaven and Furness Junction Ry.
Co. (1850) 3 H.L. Cas. 1.
5. The Role of the Common Law
• There have been frequent references to the common
law by the local courts and the common law plays a
significant part in law of evidence which cannot be
ignored. However it is submitted that the courts
should seeks the answer in the Evidence Act 1950
first and should only refer to the common law where it
is absolutely necessary (where there is an ambiguity
or where there is a lacuna).
• See The Governor and Company of the Bank of
England v Vagliano Brothers [1891] AC 107;
Jayasena v. R [1970] 1 All ER 219; PP v Sanassi
[1970] 2 MLJ 198; PP v Yuvaraj [1969] 2 MLJ 89 &
PP v Glenn Knight Jeyasingam [1999] 2 SLR 499.
6. EVIDENCE.
Section 3 of EA 1950,
Evidence includes:
• (a) all statements which the court permits or requires to be
made before it by witnesses in relation to matters of fact
under inquiry: such statements are called oral evidence;
• (b) all documents produced for the inspection of the
court: such documents are called documentary evidence;
• However, the use of the word ‘includes’ is intended to
make the definition of ‘evidence’ in the section extensive.
This means that the meaning of the word ‘evidence’ in the
section goes beyond the narrow statutory meaning
explicitly set out.
• This view is based in the case of Chin Seow Noi v PP
[1994] 1 SLR 135 where Yong Pung How CJ said at page
156 that “The use of the single word ‘includes in our
section 3 is clearly intended to make the definition of
evidence an extensive one”.
8. Facts in issue & relevant facts
• Section 5 of EA 1950, Evidence may be given of facts in issue
and relevant facts. It provides that:
“Evidence may be given in any suit or proceeding of the existence
or non-existence of every fact in issue and of such other facts as
are hereinafter declared to be relevant, and of no others”.
o This section lays down the rule that evidence may be given only
of fact in issue and others facts declared by this Act to be relevant,
and no other.
9. Facts in issue
• Fact in issue in civil proceeding
- It is identifiable from the pleadings. The
whole point of which is to set out the parties’
allegations, admissions, and denials. Matter
which are left open in dispute.
- See How Paik Too v Mohideen [1968] 1
MLJ 51, 52.
• Fact in issue in criminal proceeding
- In any event, whenever there is a plea of not
guilty, everything is in issue and the
prosecution have to prove the whole of their
case, including the identity of the accused, the
nature of the act and the existence of any
necessary knowledge or intent.
- See R v Sims [1946] 1 All ER 697, 701.
10. Relevant facts
• Section 3 of EA 1950 provides that:
- relevant mean “one fact is said to be relevant to
another when the one is connected with the other in
any of the ways referred to in the provisions of this Act
relating to the relevancy of facts”.
• Whatever is logically probative is not necessarily
admissible in evidence unless it is so declared under
the Act. Matters that are logically relevant but not
legally admissible include privileges, hearsay and
character evidence.
• PP v Haji Kassim (1971) 2 MLJ 115 stated that “If
any fact is sought to be introduced in evidence it must
be relevant and admissible under section 5”.
• Chong Siew Fai CJ in Thavanathan a/l
Subramaniam v PP [1997] 2 MLJ 401 at page 409
stated that “Of the law of evidence, the cardinal rule
relating to relevancy is that subject to exclusionary
rules, all evidence which sufficiently relevant to the
facts in issue is admissible”.
11. Continue…
• Per Thesiger J in R v Harz [1966] 3 All ER 433, 449 stated that:
- “The main general rule governing the entire subject is that evidence which is
sufficiently relevant to an issue before the court is admissible and all that is
irrelevant or insufficiently relevant should be exclude. Thus the word relevant
is to all intents and purposes synonymous with the phrase of probative value”.
o Lord Simmon of Glaisdale in DPP v Killbourne [1973] AC 729 “evidence is
relevant if it is logically probative or disapprobative of some matter which
requires proof”.
o Per Lawton LJ in R v Turner [1975] 1 ALL ER 70 states:
- “Relevance, however, does not result in evidence being admissible: it is a
condition precedent to admissibility. Our law excludes evidence of many
matters which in life outside the court sensible people take into consideration
when making decisions. Two broad heads of exclusion are hearsay and
opinion”. Facts declared to be relevant by the Act are contained in section 6 to
55 (Part One, Chapter Two).