This document is a response letter from Denise Newsome to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regarding two previous complaints Newsome filed against her former employers.
Newsome reiterates her demand to be notified of any conflicts of interest regarding her complaints. She also argues that the EEOC is required by federal statute to defer her complaints to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, but has failed to do so, depriving her of her civil rights. Newsome cites several court cases establishing that filing with a state agency is a mandatory prerequisite to filing an age discrimination claim in federal court. She maintains the EEOC's actions have been arbitrary and caused her harm.
062112 Response To EEOC 06/14/12 LetterVogelDenise
This document responds to a June 14, 2012 letter from Wilma Javey, Director of the Cincinnati Area Office of the EEOC. It objects to Javey usurping authority over the Secretary of Labor and asserts this constitutes an abuse of power that has caused irreparable harm. It also alleges the EEOC's handling of the complaint is a continuation of criminal and civil wrongs in violation of statutes and in retaliation for a previous complaint. The response requests mandatory deferral to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission and for findings of fact and conclusions of law. It reiterates objections and requests to be advised of conflicts of interest.
041017 EEOC RESPONSE TO FIRST HERITAGE CREDIT LLC's STATEMENT OF POSITIONVogelDenise
The document is a rebuttal by Vogel Denise Newsome to a "Statement of Position" filed by First Heritage Credit, LLC regarding an EEOC charge of discrimination. Newsome objects to not being provided documents referenced in First Heritage's filing. Newsome also argues that First Heritage has not met the legal requirements to establish a defense of insubordination against the discrimination claims. Newsome requests documents from the EEOC and argues the charge was timely filed and the statute of limitations has not expired.
040617 NOTIFICATION - STATEMENT OF POSITION From First Heritage Credit (FHC)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Here is a copy of the “STATEMENT OF POSITION” provided by Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart on BEHALF of First Heritage Credit LLC in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charge brought by Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome AGAINST her former Employer.
First Heritage Credit’s “Statement of Position” is NOT in COMPLIANCE with the EEOC’s Guidelines – i.e. FATEFULLY FAILING to respond to EACH claim/charge RAISED in Newsome’s EEOC Charge. As a matter of law, FAILURE to DENY and/or RESPOND to EACH of the Claims/Charges raised ARE DEEMED “ADMITTED!”
A copy of Newsome’s EEOC Charge against First Heritage Credit/1st Heritage Credit may be found at: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/notice-of-eeoc-complaint-against-1-st-heritage-credit-llc-filed
Please feel free to visit our Website at www.vogeldenisenewsome.net and www.vogeldenisenewsome.com where BOTH are presently in the stage of being set up. We are very happy that we went with a Web Building Program as JOOMLA because OUR GOAL is to get OUTSIDE the WALLS of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime who REPEATEDLY attempts to OBSTRUCT Viewership, Analytics, etc.; however, COMPETITIVE Retro-ACTIVE Responses from us in using other Social Media Forums and SEO Engines, etc. the efforts by SlideShare’s NEW OWNER – MicroSoft – to BLOCK VIEWERSHIP has failed. Our COUNTER ATTACKS are VERY PRODUCTIVE based on the information we are getting from our website(s).
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/02-2017-vogeldenisenewsomenet-website-report
LOL!
05/24/12 - Response To EEOC Letter Of 050812VogelDenise
The document is a response letter from Denise Newsome to the United States Department of Labor - United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regarding two charges of discrimination. Newsome declines to sign confidentiality or mediation agreements, citing concerns about protecting her rights to publicly inform others about matters of social and economic importance. Newsome requests that a commissioner charge be issued and marks boxes to indicate the discriminatory actions are continuing and systematic in nature.
031615 - FAX TO EEOC WILMA SCOTT & CONGRESSMAN BENNIE THOMPSONVogelDenise
(1) Vogel Denise Newsome filed a discrimination charge against her former employer First Heritage Credit LLC with the EEOC on February 13, 2015, including a 310-page complaint.
(2) On February 20, 2015, only 7 days later, the EEOC area director dismissed the charge, claiming it was not filed in a timely manner.
(3) Newsome visited the EEOC office on February 27, 2015 to request written proof that her charge was untimely filed. She was told to submit documentation to have her case reopened.
03/30/15 FAX EMAIL TO BENNIE THOMPSON-CorrectedVogelDenise
This letter requests immediate action against the law firm Baker Donelson for its alleged racist, discriminatory, and terrorist actions against the author, Vogel Denise Newsome. It makes nine demands, including firing Baker Donelson as legal counsel for the US government, cancelling federal contracts with the firm, investigating and prosecuting the firm for civil rights violations, and seizing its financial and business assets pending investigation. The letter argues Baker Donelson has conspired in racist attacks against Newsome and others over 25 years and should be held accountable.
062112 Response To EEOC 06/14/12 LetterVogelDenise
This document responds to a June 14, 2012 letter from Wilma Javey, Director of the Cincinnati Area Office of the EEOC. It objects to Javey usurping authority over the Secretary of Labor and asserts this constitutes an abuse of power that has caused irreparable harm. It also alleges the EEOC's handling of the complaint is a continuation of criminal and civil wrongs in violation of statutes and in retaliation for a previous complaint. The response requests mandatory deferral to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission and for findings of fact and conclusions of law. It reiterates objections and requests to be advised of conflicts of interest.
041017 EEOC RESPONSE TO FIRST HERITAGE CREDIT LLC's STATEMENT OF POSITIONVogelDenise
The document is a rebuttal by Vogel Denise Newsome to a "Statement of Position" filed by First Heritage Credit, LLC regarding an EEOC charge of discrimination. Newsome objects to not being provided documents referenced in First Heritage's filing. Newsome also argues that First Heritage has not met the legal requirements to establish a defense of insubordination against the discrimination claims. Newsome requests documents from the EEOC and argues the charge was timely filed and the statute of limitations has not expired.
040617 NOTIFICATION - STATEMENT OF POSITION From First Heritage Credit (FHC)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Here is a copy of the “STATEMENT OF POSITION” provided by Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart on BEHALF of First Heritage Credit LLC in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charge brought by Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome AGAINST her former Employer.
First Heritage Credit’s “Statement of Position” is NOT in COMPLIANCE with the EEOC’s Guidelines – i.e. FATEFULLY FAILING to respond to EACH claim/charge RAISED in Newsome’s EEOC Charge. As a matter of law, FAILURE to DENY and/or RESPOND to EACH of the Claims/Charges raised ARE DEEMED “ADMITTED!”
A copy of Newsome’s EEOC Charge against First Heritage Credit/1st Heritage Credit may be found at: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/notice-of-eeoc-complaint-against-1-st-heritage-credit-llc-filed
Please feel free to visit our Website at www.vogeldenisenewsome.net and www.vogeldenisenewsome.com where BOTH are presently in the stage of being set up. We are very happy that we went with a Web Building Program as JOOMLA because OUR GOAL is to get OUTSIDE the WALLS of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime who REPEATEDLY attempts to OBSTRUCT Viewership, Analytics, etc.; however, COMPETITIVE Retro-ACTIVE Responses from us in using other Social Media Forums and SEO Engines, etc. the efforts by SlideShare’s NEW OWNER – MicroSoft – to BLOCK VIEWERSHIP has failed. Our COUNTER ATTACKS are VERY PRODUCTIVE based on the information we are getting from our website(s).
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/02-2017-vogeldenisenewsomenet-website-report
LOL!
05/24/12 - Response To EEOC Letter Of 050812VogelDenise
The document is a response letter from Denise Newsome to the United States Department of Labor - United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regarding two charges of discrimination. Newsome declines to sign confidentiality or mediation agreements, citing concerns about protecting her rights to publicly inform others about matters of social and economic importance. Newsome requests that a commissioner charge be issued and marks boxes to indicate the discriminatory actions are continuing and systematic in nature.
031615 - FAX TO EEOC WILMA SCOTT & CONGRESSMAN BENNIE THOMPSONVogelDenise
(1) Vogel Denise Newsome filed a discrimination charge against her former employer First Heritage Credit LLC with the EEOC on February 13, 2015, including a 310-page complaint.
(2) On February 20, 2015, only 7 days later, the EEOC area director dismissed the charge, claiming it was not filed in a timely manner.
(3) Newsome visited the EEOC office on February 27, 2015 to request written proof that her charge was untimely filed. She was told to submit documentation to have her case reopened.
03/30/15 FAX EMAIL TO BENNIE THOMPSON-CorrectedVogelDenise
This letter requests immediate action against the law firm Baker Donelson for its alleged racist, discriminatory, and terrorist actions against the author, Vogel Denise Newsome. It makes nine demands, including firing Baker Donelson as legal counsel for the US government, cancelling federal contracts with the firm, investigating and prosecuting the firm for civil rights violations, and seizing its financial and business assets pending investigation. The letter argues Baker Donelson has conspired in racist attacks against Newsome and others over 25 years and should be held accountable.
041815 - APPEAL-PETITION TO EEOC (Newsome vs First Heritage Credit Matter)VogelDenise
ATTEMPTS BY THE United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) and its Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz COVER-UP of Employment Discrimination Practices by First Heritage Credit
EEOC COMPLAINT AGAINST 1ST HERITAGE CREDIT LLC FILEDVogelDenise
Through Newsome’s EEOC Complaint and Investigation(s), see HOW Corporations as First Heritage Credit LLC use the Willie Lynch Practices in its DAILY OPERATIONS – i.e. SLAVEMASTERS relying on IGNORANT BLACK-Americans to ATTACK and DESTROY each other while they sit back and LAUGH at these STUPID BLACK-Americans!
02/09/15 PUBLIC RELEASE EEOC CHARGE AGAINST 1ST HERITAGE CREDIT – United States of America’s SYSTEMATIC RACIST TERRORIST ACTS REPORTED – WATCH And See HOW President Barack Obama, The United States Congress, Their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz ALONG With Their WESTERN/EUROPEAN/JEWISH Allies Will WORK To COVER-UP Their CRIMES and CIVIL INJUSTICES!
Have You Heard Of Willie Lynch? Have You Seen Willie Lynch In Practice? There's nothing like getting an AFRICAN-American Education.
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obama-administrations-willie-lynch-and-jim-crow-practices-english
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/willie-lynch-letter
120816 FAX RESPONSE - TO 111516 EEOC CORRESPONDENCE FROM DELNER FRANKLIN-THOM...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This is a REDACTED Copy of Vogel Denise Newsome's 12/08/16 faxed RESPONSE to the 11/15/16 Correspondence and Notice of Revocation she received from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Birmingham District Office (Delner Franklin-Thomas - AREA DIRECTOR).
03/12/11 PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT (President Barack Obama)VogelDenise
This document is a petition for an extraordinary writ filed with the United States Supreme Court by Denise Newsome. The petition raises numerous questions regarding the handling of Newsome's prior "Emergency Motion to Stay" and alleges discrimination, bias, conflicts of interest, and due process violations in the lower courts' handling of her legal matters. Newsome seeks emergency injunctive relief and asks the Supreme Court to correct various legal wrongs. She alleges a pattern of unlawful practices against her related to her protected activities.
CHARLES K. GRANT, Baker Donelson & KU KLUX KLAN Efforts To Take Over Jackson ...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This information is provided for purposes of informing and educating the PUBLIC/WORLD of the efforts of the KU KLUX KLAN and its Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz to UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY TAKE CONTROL of a Historical Black University (Jackson State University) by using HOUSE NEGROES and ENGAGING in FRAUDULENT and DECEPTIVE practices to ACHIEVE the OBJECT of such CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES!
In the 10/07/15 Article entitled, “URBAN RENEWAL FROM THE EYES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVIST VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME,” Newsome NOTIFIED of such CRIMINAL activities by WHITE Zionists and WHITE Supremacists WHEN they FAILED in the MERGING of the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) in Mississippi.
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/100715-urban-renewal-from-the-eyes-of-community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Not only that, this information is provided to EXPOSE “HOW” the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime is CONTROLLED and RUN by the WHITE Zionist and WHITE Supremacist Law Firm of BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ (“Baker Donelson”) and such CRITICAL and PERTINENT Information is INTENTIONALLY WITHHELD from Citizens/Residents in the United States of America as well as from FOREIGN Governments/Leaders and Citizens!
Information such as this WILL BE USED in the BUILDING of a GOVERNMENT on behalf of BLACKS/AFRICAN-Americans/Negroes/People-of-Color.
Baker Donelson has MADE KNOWN that it likes to work behind the scene – i.e. remaining UNDETECTED! However, these BEHIND-THE-SCENES RACIST/DISCRIMINATORY and TERRORIST Acts are being BROUGHT OUT to the PUBLIC/WORLD by Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome! WHITE Zionists and WHITE Supremacists that are COWARDS and LIKE TO HIDE and FRAME OTHERS for their RACIST/DISCRIMINATORY and TERRORIST Acts; however, Newsome is here to EXPOSE and make sure that HISTORY is ACCURATELY written REGARDING “HOW” the United States DESPOT FELL!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-invisible-practices-pulling-the-strings-behindthescene-practices
It is IMPORTANT for the PUBLIC/WORLD to SEE and KNOW that Baker Donelson is Legal Counsel to:
United States of America
FEDERAL and STATE Government Agencies – i.e. EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE and JUDICIAL
And HOW they use their CONTROL of the FEDERAL and STATE Governments to MANIPULATE the JUDICIAL PROCESS and COVER-UP their CRIMINAL and CIVIL Wrongs!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-invisible-practices-pulling-the-strings-behindthescene-practices
JUST THE FACTS FROM,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
(513) 680-2922
DONATE IN SUPPORT at: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
The document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system, beginning with the origins of common law in medieval England and continuing through the major sources of American law including the U.S. Constitution, federal and state statutes, administrative regulations, and court precedents. It discusses both civil and criminal legal procedures and jurisdictions.
The document discusses concerns about discrimination and retaliation against the author by President Obama, his legal counsel Baker Donelson, and JP Morgan Chase. It provides background on their relationships and alleges they hacked the author's payroll account with Adecco and contacted employers like CZV to interfere with employment in response to the author engaging in protected activities. The purpose appears to be exposing patterns of racist and illegal behavior.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION - DEMAND FOR DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE (Regions Bank)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Requests for Admissions – Settlement Demand – Demand for Discharge of Mortgage
This is a document that is being published as many victims of the United States of America’s DESPOTISM CORPORATION Empire’s FORECLOSURE Scams are looking for solutions and remedies to address the INJUSTICES they are being subjected to as a direct and proximate result of the USA’s Despotism Empire’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, its Clients and/or their CO-Conspirators’ engagement in WAR Crimes and other Criminal Acts.
With the USA’s CORPORATION Nazi/Zionists release of the CORONAVIRUS for purposes of War Crimes, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, EXTERMINATION of the Civilian Population – i.e. for POPULATION CONTROL as well as in keeping with Nazi Leader Adolf Hitler’s NEW World Order Agenda to make the WHITE Race SUPREME over ALL other Races – this document is being shared for Educational and Informational reasons to provide those who are VICTIMS of such War Crimes that seek to ENSLAVE them, MURDER them and ROB them of their LIVELIHOOD, Home, Property, etc., through FORECLOSURE Scams, that there may be INTERNATIONAL OPTIONS available to them (i.e. especially if they are Natives/Indians/Moorish Nationals/Moorish Americans…)
The Fate of Property Held as Joint Tenants in a State Without Unilateral Seve...William Sloan
Where clients have made or are making an Enduring Power of Attorney ensure that both the client and the Attorney understand that the Attorney will be entitled to be automatically recognised as the client’s Case Guardian in any subsequent Family Court proceedings after the client no longer has capacity.
• If parties are considering acquiring property, then ensure you give complete advice about the potential consequences of holding a property as joint tenants including the fact that unilateral severance is currently not available in Western Australia.
• If parties already hold property as joint tenants, then consider giving advice about options to take steps to sever the joint tenancy, including the prospect of subsequent Family Court proceedings if the property continues to be held as joint tenants.
080317 Baker Donelson KKK SCAM TO DESTROY BLACK TOWNS - Municipal BondsVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
NOT BONDS and NOT LOANS – Its’ Called RESTITUTION!
It is important for the PUBLIC/WORLD to understand, that there are OTHER Legal and Lawful SOLUTIONS to OBTAIN FUNDING for the RESTORATION of Black/African-American Communities, Schools and bringing Businesses into the BLACK/AFRICAN-American MAJORITY Towns/Cities!
This document provides an overview of administrative protections and objectives for week 2. It begins by differentiating between civil rights and civil liberties, and defining administrative law. It then discusses statutory protections like Title VII, Title IX, HIPAA, the Privacy Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and the Whistleblower Protection Act. The document goes on to explain administrative law, administrative hearings, and how cases can cross over into civil matters. It also discusses the due process clause of the 5th and 14th amendments and requirements for impartiality in administrative hearings.
The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter Vol. 2 No. 3 (March 2015) Tanya Ward Jordan
The document summarizes information from the C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter Vol. 2 / No. 3 (March 2015). It discusses the Judgment Fund, which pays court judgments and Justice Department settlements against the government. It also promotes transparency of "Alleged Discriminating Officials" or RMOs, the people alleged to have discriminated in EEO complaints. Finally, it provides summaries of various EEO cases, such as Webster v Rumsfield and Elmers v Veterans Affairs, and highlights news items related to EEOC proposed rule changes.
06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)VogelDenise
We are working on getting this document translated in multiple languages due to overwhelming INTERNATIONAL interests. Please be patient and feel free to check back for other translations.
SSA's ALJs Were Unconstitutionally Appointed Prior to July 16, 2018Chermol & Fishman, LLC
The Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v. SEC that administrative law judges (ALJs) of the Securities and Exchange Commission were improperly appointed under the Constitution if not appointed by the head of the agency. This ruling also applies to ALJs of the Social Security Administration. Disability representatives should object in letters to unfavorable rulings by SSA ALJs before July 16, 2018, requesting reassignment to a new ALJ, as the prior ALJ was not properly appointed under Lucia. Lucia can also apply to federal court appeals of social security disability cases.
Divorce 101: What You Need To Know Before Filing For Divorce in ArizonaBillie Tarascio
With 8 in 10 people in Arizona filing for divorce without an attorney, it's vital that you know what attorneys know about what to do before you start the process. This presentation walks you through the things you'll need to know
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This Article contains the 06/15/17 Response from the STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA - BOARD OF EDUCATION!
As we move into a NEW ERA, it is IMPORTANT to SEND A STRONG MESSAGE to the United States’ DESPOTISM “CORPORATE” Government Regime, the State of Florida, Florida’s Governor RICK SCOTT, . . .FLORIDA BOARD OF GOVERNOR, the Law Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz that the CANNOT have Florida A&M University. Their WHITE President Donald Trump asked “WHAT DO WE HAVE TO LOSE?” Apparently Blacks/African-American/Negroes/People-Of-Color have a GREAT DEAL and are making GREAT STRIDES that the WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists have STOOPED to such LEVELS and are TRYING to STEAL their SCHOOLS and UNIVERSITIES!
Also, is here is the News Article of the KOCH BROTHERS efforts to FORM a NEW GOVERNMENT in that they REALIZE that their DESPOTISM “CORPORATE” Government Regime has COLLAPSED – What STUPIDITY!
At least their PAYING ATTENTION to WHAT Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome is doing! LOL!
Support the WORK with your LOVE DONATIONS at:
USA: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
INTERNATIONAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
With Peace & Love,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
(513) 680-2922
Barbara A. Thompson & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis, Due ProcessWilliam Kritsonis
This document discusses the constitutional concept of due process as it applies to public school employment in Texas. It outlines the different types of employment contracts for school personnel, including at-will, probationary, term, and continuing contracts. It explains that due process protections apply if a property right, such as continued employment under a term contract, is deprived. The hiring and firing process, as well as common legal issues that arise regarding contract non-renewals and terminations, are also summarized.
Barbara A. Thompson & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis, employment lawWilliam Kritsonis
This document discusses the constitutional concept of due process as it applies to public school employment in Texas. It explains that public employees are entitled to due process protections under the 14th Amendment if they have a property right in continued employment. It outlines the different types of employment contracts in Texas public schools - including at-will, probationary, term, and continuing contracts - and the due process rights afforded to employees under each type. It also discusses the hiring and firing process for public school personnel and the role of the State Board for Educator Certification.
02/28/12 EMAIL CONTENTS (What The United States Of America's CONGRESS/MEDIA I...VogelDenise
02/28/12 EMAIL CONTENTS (What The United States Of America's CONGRESS/MEDIA Is HIDING
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, HEALTH CARE BILL/LAW, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
This document is a presentation on same-sex marriage that includes: an overview of the Declaration of Independence and basic rights it enshrines; a summary of the Defense of Marriage Act; and summaries of three major court cases - Plessy v. Ferguson, Perez v. Sharp, and Loving v. Virginia - that relate to marriage rights. The presentation also examines arguments for and against maintaining the Defense of Marriage Act.
Marketing channels refer to the independent organizations involved in making a product available for use or consumption. They perform functions like breaking bulk, pricing, passing consumer data to manufacturers, bringing different product assortments, buying or storing products, sharing risks, and helping with promotional campaigns. Strategies used include the pull strategy, which relies on consumer demand, and push strategy, which relies on selling and promotion efforts. Channels can be standardized globally but also adapted locally, as seen with McDonald's standardizing layouts and services worldwide but adapting menus in different countries. Channels are developed in levels from the manufacturer or distributor (level 0) down to retailers (level 3). Channel flow includes the movement of cash, physical products, legal title, information
041815 - APPEAL-PETITION TO EEOC (Newsome vs First Heritage Credit Matter)VogelDenise
ATTEMPTS BY THE United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) and its Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz COVER-UP of Employment Discrimination Practices by First Heritage Credit
EEOC COMPLAINT AGAINST 1ST HERITAGE CREDIT LLC FILEDVogelDenise
Through Newsome’s EEOC Complaint and Investigation(s), see HOW Corporations as First Heritage Credit LLC use the Willie Lynch Practices in its DAILY OPERATIONS – i.e. SLAVEMASTERS relying on IGNORANT BLACK-Americans to ATTACK and DESTROY each other while they sit back and LAUGH at these STUPID BLACK-Americans!
02/09/15 PUBLIC RELEASE EEOC CHARGE AGAINST 1ST HERITAGE CREDIT – United States of America’s SYSTEMATIC RACIST TERRORIST ACTS REPORTED – WATCH And See HOW President Barack Obama, The United States Congress, Their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz ALONG With Their WESTERN/EUROPEAN/JEWISH Allies Will WORK To COVER-UP Their CRIMES and CIVIL INJUSTICES!
Have You Heard Of Willie Lynch? Have You Seen Willie Lynch In Practice? There's nothing like getting an AFRICAN-American Education.
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obama-administrations-willie-lynch-and-jim-crow-practices-english
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/willie-lynch-letter
120816 FAX RESPONSE - TO 111516 EEOC CORRESPONDENCE FROM DELNER FRANKLIN-THOM...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This is a REDACTED Copy of Vogel Denise Newsome's 12/08/16 faxed RESPONSE to the 11/15/16 Correspondence and Notice of Revocation she received from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Birmingham District Office (Delner Franklin-Thomas - AREA DIRECTOR).
03/12/11 PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT (President Barack Obama)VogelDenise
This document is a petition for an extraordinary writ filed with the United States Supreme Court by Denise Newsome. The petition raises numerous questions regarding the handling of Newsome's prior "Emergency Motion to Stay" and alleges discrimination, bias, conflicts of interest, and due process violations in the lower courts' handling of her legal matters. Newsome seeks emergency injunctive relief and asks the Supreme Court to correct various legal wrongs. She alleges a pattern of unlawful practices against her related to her protected activities.
CHARLES K. GRANT, Baker Donelson & KU KLUX KLAN Efforts To Take Over Jackson ...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This information is provided for purposes of informing and educating the PUBLIC/WORLD of the efforts of the KU KLUX KLAN and its Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz to UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY TAKE CONTROL of a Historical Black University (Jackson State University) by using HOUSE NEGROES and ENGAGING in FRAUDULENT and DECEPTIVE practices to ACHIEVE the OBJECT of such CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES!
In the 10/07/15 Article entitled, “URBAN RENEWAL FROM THE EYES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVIST VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME,” Newsome NOTIFIED of such CRIMINAL activities by WHITE Zionists and WHITE Supremacists WHEN they FAILED in the MERGING of the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) in Mississippi.
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/100715-urban-renewal-from-the-eyes-of-community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Not only that, this information is provided to EXPOSE “HOW” the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime is CONTROLLED and RUN by the WHITE Zionist and WHITE Supremacist Law Firm of BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ (“Baker Donelson”) and such CRITICAL and PERTINENT Information is INTENTIONALLY WITHHELD from Citizens/Residents in the United States of America as well as from FOREIGN Governments/Leaders and Citizens!
Information such as this WILL BE USED in the BUILDING of a GOVERNMENT on behalf of BLACKS/AFRICAN-Americans/Negroes/People-of-Color.
Baker Donelson has MADE KNOWN that it likes to work behind the scene – i.e. remaining UNDETECTED! However, these BEHIND-THE-SCENES RACIST/DISCRIMINATORY and TERRORIST Acts are being BROUGHT OUT to the PUBLIC/WORLD by Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome! WHITE Zionists and WHITE Supremacists that are COWARDS and LIKE TO HIDE and FRAME OTHERS for their RACIST/DISCRIMINATORY and TERRORIST Acts; however, Newsome is here to EXPOSE and make sure that HISTORY is ACCURATELY written REGARDING “HOW” the United States DESPOT FELL!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-invisible-practices-pulling-the-strings-behindthescene-practices
It is IMPORTANT for the PUBLIC/WORLD to SEE and KNOW that Baker Donelson is Legal Counsel to:
United States of America
FEDERAL and STATE Government Agencies – i.e. EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE and JUDICIAL
And HOW they use their CONTROL of the FEDERAL and STATE Governments to MANIPULATE the JUDICIAL PROCESS and COVER-UP their CRIMINAL and CIVIL Wrongs!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-invisible-practices-pulling-the-strings-behindthescene-practices
JUST THE FACTS FROM,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
(513) 680-2922
DONATE IN SUPPORT at: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
The document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system, beginning with the origins of common law in medieval England and continuing through the major sources of American law including the U.S. Constitution, federal and state statutes, administrative regulations, and court precedents. It discusses both civil and criminal legal procedures and jurisdictions.
The document discusses concerns about discrimination and retaliation against the author by President Obama, his legal counsel Baker Donelson, and JP Morgan Chase. It provides background on their relationships and alleges they hacked the author's payroll account with Adecco and contacted employers like CZV to interfere with employment in response to the author engaging in protected activities. The purpose appears to be exposing patterns of racist and illegal behavior.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION - DEMAND FOR DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE (Regions Bank)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Requests for Admissions – Settlement Demand – Demand for Discharge of Mortgage
This is a document that is being published as many victims of the United States of America’s DESPOTISM CORPORATION Empire’s FORECLOSURE Scams are looking for solutions and remedies to address the INJUSTICES they are being subjected to as a direct and proximate result of the USA’s Despotism Empire’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, its Clients and/or their CO-Conspirators’ engagement in WAR Crimes and other Criminal Acts.
With the USA’s CORPORATION Nazi/Zionists release of the CORONAVIRUS for purposes of War Crimes, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, EXTERMINATION of the Civilian Population – i.e. for POPULATION CONTROL as well as in keeping with Nazi Leader Adolf Hitler’s NEW World Order Agenda to make the WHITE Race SUPREME over ALL other Races – this document is being shared for Educational and Informational reasons to provide those who are VICTIMS of such War Crimes that seek to ENSLAVE them, MURDER them and ROB them of their LIVELIHOOD, Home, Property, etc., through FORECLOSURE Scams, that there may be INTERNATIONAL OPTIONS available to them (i.e. especially if they are Natives/Indians/Moorish Nationals/Moorish Americans…)
The Fate of Property Held as Joint Tenants in a State Without Unilateral Seve...William Sloan
Where clients have made or are making an Enduring Power of Attorney ensure that both the client and the Attorney understand that the Attorney will be entitled to be automatically recognised as the client’s Case Guardian in any subsequent Family Court proceedings after the client no longer has capacity.
• If parties are considering acquiring property, then ensure you give complete advice about the potential consequences of holding a property as joint tenants including the fact that unilateral severance is currently not available in Western Australia.
• If parties already hold property as joint tenants, then consider giving advice about options to take steps to sever the joint tenancy, including the prospect of subsequent Family Court proceedings if the property continues to be held as joint tenants.
080317 Baker Donelson KKK SCAM TO DESTROY BLACK TOWNS - Municipal BondsVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
NOT BONDS and NOT LOANS – Its’ Called RESTITUTION!
It is important for the PUBLIC/WORLD to understand, that there are OTHER Legal and Lawful SOLUTIONS to OBTAIN FUNDING for the RESTORATION of Black/African-American Communities, Schools and bringing Businesses into the BLACK/AFRICAN-American MAJORITY Towns/Cities!
This document provides an overview of administrative protections and objectives for week 2. It begins by differentiating between civil rights and civil liberties, and defining administrative law. It then discusses statutory protections like Title VII, Title IX, HIPAA, the Privacy Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and the Whistleblower Protection Act. The document goes on to explain administrative law, administrative hearings, and how cases can cross over into civil matters. It also discusses the due process clause of the 5th and 14th amendments and requirements for impartiality in administrative hearings.
The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter Vol. 2 No. 3 (March 2015) Tanya Ward Jordan
The document summarizes information from the C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter Vol. 2 / No. 3 (March 2015). It discusses the Judgment Fund, which pays court judgments and Justice Department settlements against the government. It also promotes transparency of "Alleged Discriminating Officials" or RMOs, the people alleged to have discriminated in EEO complaints. Finally, it provides summaries of various EEO cases, such as Webster v Rumsfield and Elmers v Veterans Affairs, and highlights news items related to EEOC proposed rule changes.
06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)VogelDenise
We are working on getting this document translated in multiple languages due to overwhelming INTERNATIONAL interests. Please be patient and feel free to check back for other translations.
SSA's ALJs Were Unconstitutionally Appointed Prior to July 16, 2018Chermol & Fishman, LLC
The Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v. SEC that administrative law judges (ALJs) of the Securities and Exchange Commission were improperly appointed under the Constitution if not appointed by the head of the agency. This ruling also applies to ALJs of the Social Security Administration. Disability representatives should object in letters to unfavorable rulings by SSA ALJs before July 16, 2018, requesting reassignment to a new ALJ, as the prior ALJ was not properly appointed under Lucia. Lucia can also apply to federal court appeals of social security disability cases.
Divorce 101: What You Need To Know Before Filing For Divorce in ArizonaBillie Tarascio
With 8 in 10 people in Arizona filing for divorce without an attorney, it's vital that you know what attorneys know about what to do before you start the process. This presentation walks you through the things you'll need to know
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This Article contains the 06/15/17 Response from the STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA - BOARD OF EDUCATION!
As we move into a NEW ERA, it is IMPORTANT to SEND A STRONG MESSAGE to the United States’ DESPOTISM “CORPORATE” Government Regime, the State of Florida, Florida’s Governor RICK SCOTT, . . .FLORIDA BOARD OF GOVERNOR, the Law Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz that the CANNOT have Florida A&M University. Their WHITE President Donald Trump asked “WHAT DO WE HAVE TO LOSE?” Apparently Blacks/African-American/Negroes/People-Of-Color have a GREAT DEAL and are making GREAT STRIDES that the WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists have STOOPED to such LEVELS and are TRYING to STEAL their SCHOOLS and UNIVERSITIES!
Also, is here is the News Article of the KOCH BROTHERS efforts to FORM a NEW GOVERNMENT in that they REALIZE that their DESPOTISM “CORPORATE” Government Regime has COLLAPSED – What STUPIDITY!
At least their PAYING ATTENTION to WHAT Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome is doing! LOL!
Support the WORK with your LOVE DONATIONS at:
USA: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
INTERNATIONAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
With Peace & Love,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
(513) 680-2922
Barbara A. Thompson & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis, Due ProcessWilliam Kritsonis
This document discusses the constitutional concept of due process as it applies to public school employment in Texas. It outlines the different types of employment contracts for school personnel, including at-will, probationary, term, and continuing contracts. It explains that due process protections apply if a property right, such as continued employment under a term contract, is deprived. The hiring and firing process, as well as common legal issues that arise regarding contract non-renewals and terminations, are also summarized.
Barbara A. Thompson & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis, employment lawWilliam Kritsonis
This document discusses the constitutional concept of due process as it applies to public school employment in Texas. It explains that public employees are entitled to due process protections under the 14th Amendment if they have a property right in continued employment. It outlines the different types of employment contracts in Texas public schools - including at-will, probationary, term, and continuing contracts - and the due process rights afforded to employees under each type. It also discusses the hiring and firing process for public school personnel and the role of the State Board for Educator Certification.
02/28/12 EMAIL CONTENTS (What The United States Of America's CONGRESS/MEDIA I...VogelDenise
02/28/12 EMAIL CONTENTS (What The United States Of America's CONGRESS/MEDIA Is HIDING
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, HEALTH CARE BILL/LAW, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
This document is a presentation on same-sex marriage that includes: an overview of the Declaration of Independence and basic rights it enshrines; a summary of the Defense of Marriage Act; and summaries of three major court cases - Plessy v. Ferguson, Perez v. Sharp, and Loving v. Virginia - that relate to marriage rights. The presentation also examines arguments for and against maintaining the Defense of Marriage Act.
Marketing channels refer to the independent organizations involved in making a product available for use or consumption. They perform functions like breaking bulk, pricing, passing consumer data to manufacturers, bringing different product assortments, buying or storing products, sharing risks, and helping with promotional campaigns. Strategies used include the pull strategy, which relies on consumer demand, and push strategy, which relies on selling and promotion efforts. Channels can be standardized globally but also adapted locally, as seen with McDonald's standardizing layouts and services worldwide but adapting menus in different countries. Channels are developed in levels from the manufacturer or distributor (level 0) down to retailers (level 3). Channel flow includes the movement of cash, physical products, legal title, information
TURKISH YOUTH UNION CONFRONTS UNITED STATES MILITARY TERRORIST REGIME (ARABIC)VogelDenise
لأول مرة تصرخ لشباب الوحدة التركية للشجاعة الوقوف استغرق في مواجهة الولايات المتحدة لنظام ارهابي العسكرية الأمريكية.
لقد استمتعت حقا الضحكة والاستمرار في الضحك في كل مرة أشاهد فيديو كليب الافراج عنهم. لقد استمتعت وضع هذا العرض معا لتسليط المزيد من الضوء على هذه المسألة! ليس ذلك فحسب، وتجد أنها مثيرة للاهتمام لكيفية WESTERN الأخبار في تغطيتها وصفت الموقف بأنه هجوم. ومع ذلك، فشلت في إبلاغ العامة / عالم أن أعضاء اتحاد الشباب التركي كانت مجرد يعربون عن معارضتهم للولايات المتحدة الأمريكية العسكري إرهابية يجري على ترابه / في أرضهم!
NO أخرى البلطجة: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/no-more-bullying-standing-up-to-the-united-states-of-america
انه من العار والخزي عندما يرى المرء أن القيادات الحكومية في الأمم من اللون لم تتعلم شيئا من الولايات المتحدة للتاريخ أميركا - - كيف جاءت WHITES الأوروبية في وسرقوا الأرض أن الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية هي عليه اليوم من السكان الأصليين (الهنود ، وما إلى ذلك).
إنه لمن العار والخزي عندما القيادات الحكومية في الأمم من اللون تتآمر مع قادة الحكومة التي تسيطر عليها الأمم WHITE لقتل / جريمة قتل / تحطم مواطنيها بسبب لون بشرتهم، فضلا عن دينهم (المسلم / الإسلام). يبدو أن قادة حكومة غبية وجاهلة أن يتعلم شيئا ومثل الهنود الحمر الذين هم الآن في قفص بشأن التحفظات وضعت الأمم الأوروبية مع الغرب في عمل خطة الاستعباد:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/immigration-reform-in-the-united-states-of-america-arabic
إنه لمن العار والخزي عندما يعرفون القيادات الحكومية في الأمم من اللون أيضا بلادهم / تاريخ البلاد وكيف في وقت واحد كانت مدنهم جميل أن ننظر. ومع ذلك، هي الآن في حالة خراب بسبب الارهابي / WHITE تفوق أعمال الولايات المتحدة لليهود أميركا وكو كلوكس كلان! ليس هذا فقط كيف يمكن للولايات المتحدة حكومة WHITE تفوق أميركا سمحت لإسرائيل باستخدام جيشها ابدا وخوض الحروب الدينية لأنه يريد التفوق اليهودي في ال�
United States of America – IMMIGRATION REFORM - INDONESIANVogelDenise
Dokumen tersebut membahas reformasi imigrasi di Amerika Serikat dan Inggris. Di AS, isu imigrasi ilegal sangat kontroversial dan berbagai usulan reformasi telah diajukan untuk meningkatkan imigrasi hukum dan mengurangi ilegal, namun belum terwujud. Di Inggris, debat reformasi berfokus pada mengurangi imigrasi dan meningkatkan kontrol perbatasan.
The ability to safely store and easily share files is a critical IT function for any IT department. The file server has been the traditional model for delivering this functionality. Johan Hammerstrom, Chief Operating Officer at Community IT Innovators, talked about the benefits and challenges of different types of filesharing options.
TURKISH YOUTH UNION CONFRONTS UNITED STATES MILITARY TERRORIST REGIME (TURKISH)VogelDenise
İLK ÇIKIŞ TÜRK GENÇLİK BİRLİĞİ için cesur bir BAĞIRIN Amerika'nın ASKERİ TERÖR Rejimi Amerika Birleşik Devletleri karşı karşıya aldı durun.
GERÇEKTEN GÜLDÜREN ZEVK ve ben serbest bırakıldı Video Klip görmek her zaman Gülme DEVAM. Ben SAYIDA üzerinde EK IŞIK döken birlikte bu SUNUM koyarak zevk! Sadece bu değil, WESTERN Haber kendi kapsama alanında bir HÜCUM olarak standı etiketli HOW ilginç buluyorum; Ancak, Türk Gençlik Birliği üyeleri sadece kendi LAND'de / kendi TOPRAĞA olmanın Birleşik Devletleri en Of America TERÖR ASKERİ kendi İTİRAZ dile getiren olduğu KAMU / DÜNYA NOTIFY'dır için BAŞARISIZ!
ARTIK SATAŞMA: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/no-more-bullying-standing-up-to-the-united-states-of-america
Bir Renk Milletler Hükümet Liderleri Amerika'nın TARİHİ Of Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ŞEY ÖĞRENDİK olduğunu gördüğünde bir AYIP ve REZALET var - - AVRUPA WHITES geldi ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri yerlilerden bugün (Kızılderililer üzerinde arazi ÇALDI nasıl , vs.).
Bu BEYAZ-KONTROLLÜ Milletler Hükümet Liderleri Renkli anlaşmak Uluslar Devlet Liderleri / / CİNAYET ÖLDÜRMEK çünkü onların deri RENK yanı sıra DİN (Müslüman / İslam) kendi Vatandaşlar MAHVETMEK bir AYIP ve utanç verici olduğunu. HİÇBİR ŞEY ve ŞİMDİ WEST'in İLE AVRUPA Milletler EYLEM köleleştirme bir PLANINI koyduk REZERVASYONLARINIZ üzerinde CAGED ARE Kızılderili Kızılderililer gibi ÖĞRENDİK Görünüşe göre aptal ve cahil Hükümet Liderleri:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/immigration-reform-in-the-united-states-of-america-turkish
Renk Milletler Hükümet Liderleri ayrıca ülkenin / ULUS'S Geçmiş bilmek ve ne zaman bir AYIP ve REZALET NASIL kendi ŞEHİRLER bakmak GÜZEL vardı bir zamanda; Ancak, çünkü TERÖR / Amerika'nın YAHUDİLER ve Klu Klux Klan Birleşik Devletleri ırkçı beyaz Elçilerin yıkıntıları içinde ARTIK! Sadece Amerika'nın ırkçı beyaz Hükümeti Of Amerika Birleşik Devletleri İZİN NASIL olduğunun İSRAİL Ortadoğu'da ve DÜNYA GENELİNDE Yahudi tahakküm istiyor çünkü onun DİNİ Wars BEGIN ve MÜCADELE onun ASKERİ KULLANIMI için bu!
BAŞARISIZ var vb BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER, NATO, AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ, ALL desteğiyle - Milletler / Hükümetler GÜLEN ve Amerika, İsrail ve onların AKRABALARININ Birleşik Devletleri gibi bir TERÖR Hükümet Rejimi ile TEKLİFLERİ YAPMA olmak için NASIL aptal olduğunu işlerini yapmak ve görünmek için altında bu YAHUDİ ve beyazların üstünlüğünü BASARAK bir parçası olan "TEK DÜNYA iÇİN!"
Amerika Birleşik Devletleri en Amerika ASKERİ TERÖR Rejimi karşı alınan STANDI üzerinde TÜRK GENÇLİK BİRLİĞİ Yani TEKRAR ÇOK TEŞEKKÜRLER. Böyle BOLD STANDLARI büyük olasılıkla Amerika Birleşik Devletleri YAHUDİLER ve Klu Klux Klan bu ORGANİZASYONU sahip TÜRKİYE Hükümet yetkilileri ile çalışma hakk�
032115 - NOTICE OF APPEAL-PETITION TO EEOC OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONSVogelDenise
Vogel Newsome appeals the dismissal of her EEOC complaint against her former employer. She filed the complaint on February 9, 2015 within the 180-day deadline. However, the EEOC dismissed it on February 20, 2015 claiming it was not filed timely. Newsome then submitted requests to reopen the case, but the EEOC has refused to do so and has engaged in harassing phone calls. Newsome believes the EEOC is obstructing justice and conspiring with her employer and their law firm. She is now filing this appeal to notify the EEOC of her timely filing and their mandatory duty to reopen the case.
This document discusses using big data and social media signals to understand consumers at an individual level. It advocates moving beyond metrics and numbers to humanize data by understanding people's interests, passions, behaviors and how they engage with brands across multiple touchpoints. The key points discussed are:
- Leveraging data signals to gain actionable insights about individuals and at scale.
- Understanding consumers holistically by what they pay attention to online, not just transactions.
- Mapping social data like interests, behaviors and recommendations to identify addressable audiences for brands.
- Using tools like network analysis and interest mapping to better understand audience communities and engagement.
The overall message is that brands can architect more personalized and relevant engage
Gujarati thank you to republic of ecuador (asylum of julian assange)VogelDenise
અમેરિકા યુનાઈટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ ઑફ અમેરિકા માને છે કે તે કાયદા ઉપર છે અને વારંવાર "વાતાગ્ર" (માતા સાથી ગ્રેટ બ્રિટન અને બહેન સાથી તરીકે સ્વીડન) ની મદદથી આ સમાચાર અહેવાલ આવા પ્રતિકારી / ફોજદારી જુલિયન Assange સામેની સમતળ કરેલું કૃત્યો માં તેની ભૂમિકાને છુપાવો પર આધાર રાખે છે અને માતાનો અમેરિકા યુદ્ધ ગુન્હાઓ યુનાઈટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ ઑફ અમેરિકા ખુલ્લા / ન્યુરેમબર્ગ ભંગ અને અન્ય આતંકવાદી કૃત્યો! કૃપા કરીને દર્દી હોય છે, અમેરિકા રાષ્ટ્રપતિ બરાક ઓબામા યુનાઈટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ અને તેમના કાનૂની સલાહકાર / શ્વેત સર્વોચ્ચ (બેકર ડોનેલ્સન Bearman કાલ્ડવેલ અને Berkowitz) અમેરિકા યુનાઈટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ વડા વિતરિત કરશે "એ PLATTER પર!"
06/08/10 - REQUESTS FOR RESPONSE & AFFIDAVITS BY JUNE 23, 2010 - Executive De...VogelDenise
06/08/10 - REQUESTS FOR RESPONSE & AFFIDAVITS BY JUNE 23, 2010 - Executive Department's Engagement In Criminal Acts - Obama Administration Of Justice (President Barack Obama, United States Attorney Eric Holder, and Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis)
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
2010 continued a three-year trend of record breaking EEOC charges, with 2010 charges the highest in the Commission’s 45-year history. Our challenging economy, increasingly diverse workforce, new EEO laws and recent court decisions are fueling this steady growth. Keeping up on the trends is critical to protecting your workplace, and sustaining a culture of respect and inclusion
What does this mean for employers? Enhanced anti-discrimination efforts are mission critical. Effective cultural change, behavioral change, and risk management require innovative and integrated anti-discrimination programs. Now, more than ever, reviewing and refining your organization’s EEO compliance programs is essential.
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC) - IghoVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
ihe ngwọta maka udo n'ụwa!
Ewere ACTION na ime OGOLOGO oge igabiga CHANGE!
Dị ka ndị ọzọ na ndị ọzọ ndị mmadụ na-aza elu na-amalite na-ewere nguzo MEGIDE ihe ọjọọ na ajọ Forces nke United States 'DESPOTISM Government ọchịchị / Organization / Alaeze Ukwu na ya West / European jikọrọ aka, ikpe maka CONSPIRACIES na-eyi ọha egwu Ọrụ akwali Racism of Nazi na / ma ọ bụ ya White Jewish-Zionist-Supremacist Members bụ oGOLOGO oge igabiga!
Ọ dịghị mgbaghara maka CONSPIRACIES nke United States 'DESPOTISM Government ọchịchị / Organization / Alaeze Ukwu na-ekere òkè Nzuzu Igbu na mgbukpọ omume nke Innocent ikom, ndị inyom na ụmụaka! The AJỤJỤ ịjụ bụ, "Olee otú a Nazi ụmụ na ha White Juu / Zionists / Supremacists ogbo ekwe ka Ike ụgha na ibibi Beautiful Nations-Of-Agba na agbanahụ ntaramahụhụ!"
Community mmume Vogel Denise Newsome bụ inye agba Akaebe dị ka akwụkwọ a - ENGLISH Version:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
na-akwado "ihe" United States 'DESPOTISM-eyi ọha egwu Government ọchịchị si / Organization Nazi Umu na / ma ọ bụ acha ọcha Juu / Zionists / Supremacists MAARA na MGBE ha maara ma / ma ọ bụ kwesịrị ịma nke mpụ ha; Otú ọ dị, Obi ekpebi ndị ọzọ ụzọ, bụ ndị n'elu Iwu, na-anọgide na na-ebibi ihe na ha ọchịchọ "Malite Agha Ụwa nke Atọ!"
Ọ bụ TIME maka Nations-Of-Agba na People-Of-Agba na-eteta na-akwụsị ndị ọcha Ọchịchọ ime ka agbụrụ ka agbụrụ nile agbụrụ ọzọ!
NO ọzọ agha, ọ bụ oge kpee ikpe ndị ọcha eyi ọha egwu nzukọ Ndị na-arụ ọrụ ruo n'okpuru guise nke United States 'DESPOTISM Government ọchịchị / Organization / Alaeze Ukwu!
Biko chere free inye na Nkwado ọrụ a na-eziokwu eweta CHANGE, udo ma na-ekpughepụ eziokwu na:
https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome ma ọ bụ
Nzuzo ma ọ bụ na-amaghị aha onyinye: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Na udo na ịhụnanya,
Community mmume Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
Ekwentị: (513) 680-2922
10/09/10 "Emergency Motion To Stay; Emergency Motion For Enlargement Of Time ...VogelDenise
This document is a letter from Denise Newsome to Chief Justice John Roberts regarding an "Emergency Motion" filing. It summarizes a lower court case involving Stor-All Alfred LLC v. Denise Newsome. Newsome believes the case involves retaliation from President Obama and his administration for her exercising her constitutional rights. She provides documentation to support claims of corruption involving Obama supporters and special interest groups influencing the judicial process. Newsome requests the Supreme Court's intervention to correct legal wrongs and injustices.
11/19/12 - Petition For Original Writ et al (PKH) - Supreme Court (Stamped)VogelDenise
This document lists 43 questions presented for review relating to lawsuits involving the petitioner Vogel Denise Newsome. The questions cover issues such as whether extraordinary circumstances exist warranting relief, whether judges and justices should have recused themselves due to conflicts of interest, whether the petitioner's right to a jury trial was violated, and whether various parties including Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and government officials engaged in criminal, retaliatory, or conspiratorial acts against the petitioner. The petitioner seeks review of lower court rulings and requests relief including injunctive action.
121815 - OBJECTION TO 120815 ORDER ON OBJECTION (Townsend Matter)VogelDenise
POWER WITH "WE THE PEOPLE" - KNOW YOUR LEGAL/LAWFUL RIGHTS TO OVERTHROW THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT and have a GOVERNMENT that WORKS for "WE THE PEOPLE!"
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - Overthrowing Despotism, Political Corruption, Judicial Corruption/Injustices. . . .HEALING and RESTORING a NATION!
08/25/12 United States Supreme Court RESPONSEVogelDenise
This document is a response from Petitioner Vogel Denise Newsome to the Supreme Court regarding documents that were returned on June 28, 2012 with no explanation. Newsome questions what the Supreme Court does not understand about her Petition for Extraordinary Writ filed under the All Writs Act. She notes potential conflicts of interest between the Court and Baker Donelson law firm. Newsome demands the Justices recuse themselves and accuses the Court of obstruction of justice and abuse of the judicial process to protect interests until after the 2012 election.
05/21/09 - REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: Reque...VogelDenise
05/21/09 - REPORTING OF RACIAL AND DISCRIMINATION PRACTICES COMPLAINT: Requests For Status; Request For Creation Of Committees/Court, Investigations And Findings - Constitutional, Civil Rights Violations and Discrimination; and DEMAND/RELIEF REQUESTED - - With PROOF OF MAILING (United States Postal Service RECEIPTS)
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
01/04/13 RESPONSE To 11/05/12 US Supreme Court Documents ReturnedVogelDenise
This document is a response from Denise Newsome to the Supreme Court regarding documents returned to her without explanation on November 5, 2012. It requests that the Court provide in writing by January 25, 2013 any deficiencies or lack of understanding regarding Newsome's October 30, 2012 petition that was received by the Court on November 5, 2012. Newsome reiterates demands for information on any conflicts of interest. The response aims to preserve Newsome's rights and address matters of public and international importance.
This document is an EEOC form used for filing an appeal or petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Office of Federal Operations. It requests information about the complainant, their attorney or representative if applicable, the agency being charged with discrimination, and whether any other actions have been taken on this matter. The complainant or their representative must sign and date the form, which includes a privacy act statement explaining that personal information is being collected to properly process appeals but failure to provide it could hinder or dismiss the appeal.
08/10/12 - MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONSE TO: Motion To Strike Motion To DismissVogelDenise
This document is a motion to strike filed by plaintiff Vogel Denise Newsome in the case of Newsome v. Page Kruger & Holland P.A. et al. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The motion seeks to strike responses filed by defendants in opposition to previous motions by Newsome. Newsome argues the defendants do not dispute her right to a jury trial under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the 7th Amendment. Newsome also argues Judge Tom S. Lee must recuse himself due to a conflict of interest. Newsome cites statutes requiring recusal when a judge's impartiality may reasonably be questioned.
REBUTTAL TO 093015 BANKRUPTCY COURT FRIVOLOUS FINAL JUDGMENT - SHELLACKING 10...VogelDenise
We look forward to providing with a copy of the REBUTTAL to Bankruptcy Judge Edward Ellington's 9/30/15 Final Judgment . . . in the Townsend matter. Please be patient and return at a later date. In the meantime, you may want to visit our website at www.vogeldenisenewsome.net
C4C dedicates this edition of C4C Federal Exchange to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. – An Iconic Civil Rights Activist, A Man of Service. The January 2015 edition of the Exchange features Mr. Felton Batiste of ASKFMB; civil rights activists Ms. Janet Howard and Ms. Joyce E. Megginson and an article by Mr. Douglas Kinan on Fergusons In America.
This document is a response to the Supreme Court of the United States' May 4, 2012 letter regarding an earlier filing by Denise Newsome. Newsome argues that her previous filings and demands for the Justices to step down were proper and supported extraordinary circumstances involving national security and corruption. She accuses the Court of obstruction of justice and game playing in delaying her petitions. Newsome warns that tensions with foreign nations are increasing as they observe how the U.S. government is handling her legal actions and cover up of crimes. She implies that international intervention may be necessary if her lawful requests are not followed.
The document summarizes a case between James Seehusen, the complainant, and Mayo Clinic, the respondent. It discusses the issues in the case, applicable law, factual background, and testimony provided at a hearing. Specifically, it describes Seehusen's employment history at Mayo Clinic including operating commercial vehicles. It also outlines incidents where Seehusen was disciplined and issues he raised about vehicle safety regulations.
This document is a court order denying a motion from defendants Alec and Mike Sou for attorneys' fees and expenses under the Hyde Amendment. It provides background on the criminal case against the Sous, including that they initially pled guilty but later withdrew their pleas after the court rejected their plea agreements. It then describes how the government dismissed all charges against the Sous after a witness testified inaccurately during trial about the legality of recruiting fees. The court applies the legal standard under the Hyde Amendment and denies the Sous' motion, finding that their arguments do not establish that the government's position was vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith.
This document discusses a motion filed by Creditor Vogel Newsome regarding the bankruptcy case of Ladye M. Townsend. Newsome argues the bankruptcy court lacks jurisdiction over the matter as her prior federal lawsuit against Townsend in district court established that court's jurisdiction. Newsome also alleges misconduct by Townsend's attorney and moves for Rule 11 sanctions. Newsome consolidates her various motions and does not waive her defense that the bankruptcy court lacks jurisdiction.
06/06/12 NOTICE OF LAWSUIT To Thomas Y Page (PKH Matter)VogelDenise
1. The document describes a tracking record for a certified mail item sent from Cincinnati, OH to Flowood, MS on June 7-8, 2012.
2. It shows the item was processed through sorting facilities in Cincinnati and Jackson, MS before being delivered in Flowood.
3. The tracking provides details on the status, dates, times, and locations associated with the delivery of this certified mail item.
This newsletter discusses several civil rights issues within the federal government. It reports that 50% of civil rights complaints filed against USDA officials were not acted on in a timely manner. It also discusses a 4th Circuit court ruling making hostile work environment claims harder for employers to defend against. The newsletter then lists the names of numerous alleged discriminating officials within several federal agencies that have been accused of civil rights violations based on EEOC complaints and lawsuits. It encourages transparency around these cases and officials involved.
06/12/12 - Response To United States Supreme Court Letter Dated 05/04/12 (FINAL)VogelDenise
This is the Lawsuit that United States President Barack Obama, the United States CONGRESS, United States Supreme Court and their Legal Counsel/Advisor Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz are trying to keep from being filed as they STRUGGLE to get President Barack Obama to the 2012 Presidential Elections!
ग्रेटर मुंबई के नगर आयुक्त को एक खुले पत्र में याचिका दायर कर 540 से अधिक मुंबईकरों ने सभी अवैध और अस्थिर होर्डिंग्स, साइनबोर्ड और इलेक्ट्रिक साइनेज को तत्काल हटाने और 13 मई, 2024 की शाम को घाटकोपर में अवैध होर्डिंग के गिरने की विनाशकारी घटना के बाद अपराधियों के खिलाफ सख्त कार्रवाई की मांग की है, जिसमें 17 लोगों की जान चली गई और कई निर्दोष लोग गंभीर रूप से घायल हो गए।
Why We Chose ScyllaDB over DynamoDB for "User Watch Status"ScyllaDB
Yichen Wei and Adam Drennan share the architecture and technical requirements behind "user watch status" for a major global media streaming service, what that meant for their database, the pros and cons of the many options they considered for replacing DynamoDB, why they ultimately chose ScyllaDB, and their lessons learned so far.
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHYVoterMood
Discover the life and times of Lalu Prasad Yadav with a comprehensive biography in Hindi. Learn about his early days, rise in politics, controversies, and contribution.
Slide deck with charts from our Digital News Report 2024, the most comprehensive exploration of news consumption habits around the world, based on survey data from more than 95,000 respondents across 47 countries.
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
18062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Christian persecution in Islamic countries has intensified, with alarming incidents of violence, discrimination, and intolerance. This article highlights recent attacks in Nigeria, Pakistan, Egypt, Iran, and Iraq, exposing the multifaceted challenges faced by Christian communities. Despite the severity of these atrocities, the Western world's response remains muted due to political, economic, and social considerations. The urgent need for international intervention is underscored, emphasizing that without substantial support, the future of Christianity in these regions is at grave risk.
https://ecspe.org/the-rise-of-christian-persecution-in-islamic-countries/
Recent years have seen a disturbing rise in violence, discrimination, and intolerance against Christian communities in various Islamic countries. This multifaceted challenge, deeply rooted in historical, social, and political animosities, demands urgent attention. Despite the escalating persecution, substantial support from the Western world remains lacking.
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdfEdouardHusson
Ceci est le projet de traité qui avait été négocié entre Russes et Ukrainiens à Istanbul en mars 2022, avant que les Etats-Unis et la Grande-Bretagne ne détournent Kiev de signer.
17062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
1. RESPONSE TO AUGUST 29, 2012
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
LETTER FROM WILMA L. JAVEY - -
REITERATION TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANY/ALL
CONFLICT-OF INTERESTS1
Submitted September 28, 2012
SUBMITTED TO: VIA U.S. PRIORITY MAIL – RECEIPT NO. 0311 2550 0003 1737 3108
United States Department of Labor
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)
ATTN: U.S. Secretary of Labor – Hilda L. Solis
Frances Perkins Building
200 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20210
VIA U.S. PRIORITY MAIL – RECEIPT NO. 0311 0240 0001 0055 0473
Ohio Civil Rights Commission (“OCRC”)
Central Office
ATTN: G. Michael Payton, Esq. (Executive Director)
30 East Broad Street, 5th Floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215
EEOC COMPLAINT(S): Charge No. 473-2012-00832 (The Garretson Firm Resolution Group, Inc.)
Charge No. 473-2012-00837 (Messina Staffing/Messina Management Systems)
1
Newsome relied upon legal resources (i.e. such as PREVIOUS EEOC DECISIONS, PREVIOUS OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS
COMMISSION DECISIONS, EEOC Compliance Manual, United States Code Annotated, Supreme Court of the United States decisions,
United States District Court(s) – Ohio decisions, etc.) in the preparation of this Response. Boldface, underline, italics, HIGHLIGHTS,
caps/small caps added for emphasis.
Page 1 of 9
2. Complainant/Employee: Vogel Denise Newsome (“Newsome”)
Post Office Box 14731
Cincinnati, Ohio 45250
Phone: (513) 680-2922
Respondent(s)/ The Garretson Firm Resolution Group, Inc.
Employer(s): Attn: Sandy Sullivan (Human Resources Representative)
Attn: Matthew Garretson (Founder/Chief Executive Officer)
7775 Cooper Road
Phone: (513) 575-7167 or (513) 794-0400/(888) 556-7526
County: Hamilton County, Ohio
**Ohio Office Having 50+ employees
Messina Staffing/Messina Management Systems
Attn: Vince Messina (President)
11811 Mason-Montgomery Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45249
(513) 774-9187
COMES NOW Complainant Vogel Denise Newsome (“Newsome) and submits this her “RESPONSE TO
THE AUGUST 29, 2012 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION LETTER FROM WILMA
L. JAVEY - - REITERATION To Be NOTIFIED Of ANY/ALL CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS”
(“RT082912EEOCLetter”) in regards to the above referenced Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(“EEOC”) Complaints and the
“OFFICIAL COMPLAINT/CHARGE OF DISCRIMINATION FILED OF AND AGAINST
THE GARRETSON FIRM RESOLUTION GROUP INC. AND/OR MESSINA
STAFFING/MESSINA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS WITH UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF LABOR - UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION –
CINCINNATI AREA OFFICE and OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION – CENTRAL OFFICE;
AND REQUEST FOR COMMISSIONER CHARGE TO BE ISSUED SUBMITTED FOR FILING
ON APRIL 30, 2012” (hereinafter “Official Complaint/Charge Of Discrimination”)
in these actions.
Attached please find a copy of the EEOC’s letter dated August 29, 2012, from Wilma L. Javey (Director –
Cincinnati, Ohio Area Office) at EXHIBIT “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
In accordance with the statutes and laws governing said matters, this instant “RT082912EEOCLetter” is
submitted to support Newsome’s TIMELY response as well as for purposes of PRESERVING issues raised in the
“Official Complaint/Charge Of Discrimination” and those in her subsequent filings/responses.
Secretary Hilda Solis, as you know, Newsome DEMANDED “to be advised of the „STATUS‟ of the
MANDATORY Deferral of this instant Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Complaint/Charge to the
Page 2 of 9
3. Ohio Civil Rights Commission pursuant to 29 § 1601.13 and other statutes/laws governing said matters. For
instance 29 § 1604.8 addresses how matters are to be handled that involves claims falling within the jurisdiction of
the EEOC and the Ohio Civil Rights Commission” and provided a link of the referenced Statute (29 § 1604.8)
should there be any questions at: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/29-cfr-16048-
processingcompltateagency-highlighted; however, to date, you have DELIBRATELY with MALICIOUS intent
FAILED to DEFER the Complaint(s) to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission. As a matter of FEDERAL
Statutes/Laws, Secretary Solis, you are MANDATORILY required to refer/defer Newsome’s Complaints/Charges:
Charge No. 473-2012-00832 (The Garretson Firm Resolution Group, Inc.)
Charge No. 473-2012-00837 (Messina Staffing/Messina Management Systems)
to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission. In further support of this instant “RT082912EEOCLetter” the following
FACTS remain UNDISPUTED and, therefore, sustains that yours and the EEOC’s actions are ARBITRARY
and/or CAPRICIOUS Newsome states:
a) That the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission HAS Jurisdiction over Newsome’s
Charge/Complaint and that it has been TIMELY FILED.
b) That DEFERRAL of Newsome’s Charges/Complaints to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission
because it involves claim(s) of AGE DISCRIMINATION, etc.; therefore, deferral is
MANDATORY and NOT a discretionary act to be determined by neither you NOR the
EEOC. Nevertheless, the EEOC has WITH MALICIOUS intent FAILED to defer
Newsome’s Charge/Complaint to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission which has cause
Newsome IRREPABLE injury/harm and deprived her rights secured/guaranteed under the
Civil Rights Act, United States Constitution and other statutes/laws governing said matters.
Moreover, depriving Newsome EQUAL protection of the laws, EQUAL privileges and
immunities under the laws and DUE PROCESS of laws.
c) Secretary Solis, while you are DELIBERATELY and with MALICIOUS intent attempting
to get Newsome to file a Civil Action in Federal Court in regards to her Complaints/Charges,
said Court(s) LACK jurisdiction act as stated in Newsome’s June 21, 2012 pleading entitled,
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT REQUESTS: MANDATORY
DEFERRAL TO THE OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION PURSUANT TO
29 CFR §1601.13/1604.8 AND OTHER GOVERNING STATUTES/LAWS,
MANDATORY COMMISSIONER CHARGE TO ISSUE PURSUANT TO 29
CFR § 1601.6 AND OTHER GOVERNING STATUTES/LAWS, AND
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSION OF LAW REQUESTED
PURSUANT TO OHIO REVISED CODE § 2315.19/FEDERAL RULES OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 52 AND OTHER GOVERNING
STATUTES/LAWS – COURT’S LACK OF JURISDICTION FOR FAILURE
TO DEFER; REITERATION OF OBJECTIONS AND REITERATION FOR
REQUESTS TO BE ADVISED OF ALL “CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS”
(“RT06-14-12EEOCLetter”)
Page 3 of 9
4. A copy of which may also be obtained from the Internet at:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/062112-response-to-eeoc-061412-letter
Secretary Solis, according to the United States Postal Service records, supporting delivery:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/062112-usps-proof-of-mailing-receipt-hilda-solis-g-
michael-payton
Wherein Newsome incorporates by reference the same defenses set forth in her June 21,
2012 pleading and previous filings.
Morris v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc., 471 N.E.2d 471 (Ohio,1984) – State filing is a
mandatory prerequisite to Age Discrimination in Employment Act action. Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, § 14, 29 U.S.C.A. § 633.
Piecuch v. Gulf & Western Mfg. Co., 626 F.Supp. 65 (N.D.Ohio.E.Div.,1985) -
District court lacked jurisdiction over age discrimination action, where plaintiff
had not filed his charge with Ohio Civil Rights Commission. Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967, § 14(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 633(b).
Furthermore see the following case law:
Ruth Dunn vs. Medina General Hospital, 917 F.Supp. 1185 (N.D. Ohio 1996) -
[3] Ohio is deferral state within meaning of statute mandating that in deferral
states, i.e. states where established agencies are empowered to remedy age
discrimination in employment, person may not bring suit in federal court under
ADEA unless person has commenced proceeding with appropriate state agency.
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, § 14(b), 29 USCA § 633(b). . . .
[3] The Supreme Court has held that 29 U.S.C. § 633(b) mandates that
in states where established agencies are empowered to remedy age discrimination
in employment (deferral states), a person may not bring a suit in federal court
under the ADEA unless she has commenced a proceeding with the appropriate
state agency. Oscar Mayer and Co. v. Evans, 441 U.S. 750, 99 S.Ct. 2066, 60
L.Ed.2d 609 (1979) (emphasis added). . . .Ohio is a deferral state within the
meaning of § 14(b) of the ADEA. Brownlow v. Edgcomb Metals Co., 573 F.Supp.
679, 683 (N.D.Ohio 1983).
EXHIBIT “B” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.
d) Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) Rule 11, Newsome is PROHIBITED
from bring a Lawsuit in which it is KNOWN to her as well as the EEOC and parties involved
that the Court(s) LACK Jurisdiction. Furthermore, Newsome as a matter of the FRCP is
MANDATORILY required to MITIGATE damages and the filing of a Lawsuit in which you
(Secretary Solis) and the EEOC is FULLY aware of CANNOT be filed for LACK of
Jurisdiction because of your DELIBERATE and MALICIOUS FAILURE to defer/refer the
Complaints/Charges regarding this instant matter to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.
e) UNDISPUTED are the statutes/laws governing said matters supporting that the EEOC is
MANDATORILY required to defer Newsome’s Complaints/Charges to the Ohio Civil
Rights Commission for COST-EFFICIENT purposes and handling. However, Secretary
Solis, you and the EEOC have FAILED to comply and are in violation of the Administrative
Procedure Act and other statutes/laws governing said issues. The Ohio Federal Court(s) are
clear on the MANDATORY requirements of DEFERRAL/REFERRAL. See for instance the
following case(s):
Page 4 of 9
5. Alsup vs. International Union of Bricklayers, 679 F.Supp. 716 (N.D. Ohio 1987) -
[11] In “deferral states” such as Ohio, where the EEOC defers to the state
agency established to investigate charges of discrimination, an EEOC charge
must be filed within 300 days after the alleged unlawful act. Civil Rights Act of
1964, § 706(e), as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e–5(f)(1).
[12] When a charge of discrimination is submitted to both the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission and state agency in a “deferral state,” the
EEOC will not formally file its charge of discrimination until after the state
agency has terminated its proceedings or 60 days have elapsed since filing of state
administrative charge, whichever occurs earlier; therefore, state administrative
charge of discrimination must generally be filed within 240 days of the alleged
unlawful practice in order to preserve claimant's right to file a Title VII lawsuit in
federal court. Civil Rights Act of 1964, § 706(e), as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §
2000e–5(f)(1).
See EXHIBIT “C” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full
herein. In the May 9, 2012 correspondence from the Ohio Civil Rights Commission’s
Sandra R. Aukeman, it ERRONOUSLY stated that Newsome’s Complaint/Charge was
UNTIMELY filed in that it applied the 180-DAY/SIX MONTHS statute of limitations,
stating,
"The Ohio Civil Rights Act, Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4112, requires
that a charge of discrimination be filed within six months of the date of harm and
therefore the charge is deemed untimely for us to pursue.
Your letter to us indicates both the Ohio Civil Rights Commission and the
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received identical
documentation. Charges may be filed with the U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission within 300 days from the date of harm and therefore could
be considered timely filed with them.
Our agency, the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, is the state admiinistrative
law enforcement agency that administers the Ohio Civiil Rights Act, Ohio Revised
Code Chapter 4112 and we are responsible for investigating charges of RACE,
color, sex, national origin, military status, disability, AGE and religion
discrimination in the areas of employment . . ."
See EXHIBIT “D” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full
herein. The Supreme Court of the United States’ decision in Oscar Mayer & Co. vs. Joseph
Evans, 99 S.Ct. 2066 (1979) is clear that:
[2] Though the Age Discrimination in Employment Act makes resort to
administrative remedies mandatory in states with agencies empowered to
remedy age discrimination in employment, a person aggrieved by alleged age
discrimination is not required by the ADEA to commence the state proceedings
within the time limit specified by state law. Age Discrimination in Employment
Act of 1967, §§ 7(c), 14(b), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 626(c), 633(b). . .
[1][2] We hold that that § 14(b) mandates that a grievant not bring suit
in federal court under § 7(c) of the ADEA until he has first resorted to
appropriate state administrative proceedings. We also hold, however, that the
grievant is not required by § 14(b) to commence the state proceedings within
time limits specified by state law. In light of these holdings, it is not necessary to
address the question of the circumstances, if any, in which failure to comply with
§ 14(b) may be excused.
[12] Even though the 120-day . . .statute of limitations on age discrimination
claims had run, complainant could comply with the mandatory requirement of
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act that he first resort to state
Page 5 of 9
6. administrative remedies by filing a signed complaint with the . . . State Civil
Rights Commission. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, § 14(b), 29
U.S.C.A. § 633(b). . . .
[12] We therefore hold that respondent may yet comply with the
requirements of § 14(b) by simply filing a signed complaint with the . . . State
Civil Rights Commission. That Commission must be given an opportunity to
entertain respondent's grievance before his federal litigation can continue. . . .
Section 14(b) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 81
Stat. 601, 607, 29 U.S.C. § 633(b), explicitly states that "no suit may be brought"
under the Act until the individual has resorted to the appropriate state remedies. .
. this means that his suit should not have been brought and should now be
dismissed.
EXHIBIT “D” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.
Even the SIXTH Circuit Court of Appeals has decided said issue to support that the Ohio
Civil Rights Commission ERRED in its failure to retain jurisdiction over Newsome’s
“Official Complaint/ Charge Of Discrimination” alleging 180-day statute had expired with
KNOWLEDGE and/or should have known that it was subject to the 240-day statute of
limitations.
Rasimas v. Michigan Dept. of Mental Health, 714 F.2d 614 (6th Cir. 1983) -
United States Supreme Court decision interpreting statutory Title VII filing
requirement to preclude charges being filed with Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission in deferral states until 60 days after state fair
employment agency has received notice of allegations may not be applied
retroactively, and therefore instant action, where plaintiff initiated complaint with
EEOC and state civil rights commission 244 days after he was terminated, was
timely filed. Civil Rights Act of 1964, §§ 701 et seq., 706(b), as amended, 42
U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e et seq., 2000e-5(c).
Nevertheless, here are approximately FIVE (5) MONTHS later and Secretary Solis, you and
the EEOC have FAILED to defer/refer Newsome’s Complaint/Charges to the Ohio Civil
Rights Commission.
f) It is UNDISPUTED that United States of America President Barack Obama is also an
Attorney (i.e. licensed to practice law – in fact CONSTITUTIONAL Law as he likes to
share) and has KNOWLEDGE that Newsome’s arguments are SOUND in statutes/laws
governing said issues.
g) It is UNDISPUTED that G. Michael Payton (Executive Director of the Ohio Civil Rights
Commission) is also an attorney. Therefore, it is NOT clear why Secretary Solis, President
Barack Obama, and Mr. Payton have not resolved the issues presented to get the
Complaints/Charges filed with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.
h) Secretary Solis, you DO NOT dispute the ERROR by the Ohio Civil Rights Commission;
however, you have FAILED to defer/refer this matter to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission
although there is EVIDENCE that the EEOC has KNOWLEDGE of the MANDATORY
“Deferral/Referral” requirements. See For instance Pitts vs. Dayton Power & Light Co.:
Arthur Pitts vs. Dayton Power & Light Co., 748 F.Supp. 527 (1989) - [1]
Terminated employee met requirements for bringing of action under the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) when the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission referred the employee's charge to the Ohio Civil Rights
Commission (OCRC) to meet the referral requirements of the ADEA, and the
employee commenced the action under the ADEA more than 60 days after
Page 6 of 9
7. proceedings were commenced with the OCRC. Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967, §§ 14, 14(b), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 633, 633(b). . . .
Section 633(b) of Title 29 of the United States Code provides in
pertinent part:
In the case of an alleged unlawful practice occurring in a State
which has a law prohibiting discrimination in employment
because of age and establishing or authorizing a State authority
to grant or seek relief from such discriminatory practice, no suit
may be brought under Section 626 of this title before the
expiration of sixty days after proceedings have been
commenced under the State law, unless such proceedings have
been earlier terminated....
the EEOC referred Plaintiff's EEOC charge to the OCRC in order to meet the
referral requirements of § 14 of the ADEA (Doc. # 14, Exh. A) . . .
See EXHIBIT “F” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.
i) Secretary Solis you and the EEOC neither DISPUTE that said issue(s) was raised and
preserved through Newsome June 8, 2012 filing entitled,
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DISMISSAL AND NOTICE OF
RIGHTS, NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT
VIOLATIONS, REQUEST FOR EEOC‟S “WRITTEN” DETERMINATION
– FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW, REQUEST FOR
“WRITTEN” TITLE VII INTERPRETATION/OPINION, REQUEST FOR
DEFERRAL TO THE OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION, REQUEST
FOR STATUS OF COMMISSION CHARGE TO ISSUE; OBJECTIONS TO
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION‟S MAY 31, 2012
DISMISSAL AND NOTICE OF RIGHTS; RESPONSE TO OHIO CIVIL
RIGHTS COMMISSION‟S LETTER DATED MAY 9, 2012 REGARDING
“YOUR INQUIRY REGARDING POTENTIAL CHARGE OF
DISCRIMINATION;” and 2ND REQUEST TO BE ADVISED OF ALL
“CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS” (hereinafter “RFROD&NOR. . .”)
A copy which may also be obtained from the Internet:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/060812-eeoc-response-final-13269482
Newsome TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY preserved this issue and set forth
demand and RIGHTS to have this instant EEOC Complaint/Charge deferred to the Ohio
Civil Rights Commission through her “RFROD&NOR. . .” See at Pages/Paragraphs: 7/¶ 8,
8/¶ 13, 11/¶ 24, 15/¶33, 18/¶42, 20/¶49 and Pages 29-30 IV.
REQUEST FOR DEFFERAL TO THE OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS
COMMISSION:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/060812-eeoc-response-final-13269482
https://secure.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8a70678e5d5f70afac9c
j) Newsome hereby DEMANDS that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s
Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis (i.e. NOT the Little “Want-To-BeChiefs” as Wilma L.
Javey) advise her in “WRITING” as to whether or not the instant Complaint/Charge brought
against Respondents (The Garretson Firm Resolution Group Inc. and Messina
Page 7 of 9
8. Staffing/Messina Management Systems) has been DEFERRED to the Ohio Civil Rights
Commission as MANDATORILY required by STATUTES/LAWS.
Secretary Solis you and the EEOC have a MANDATORY duty/obligation to MITIGATE
costs in the handling of Newsome’s Complaints/Charges. Have you and the EEOC
done so? NO! Instead, Secretary Solis, you insist on SUBJECTING Newsome to
further INJURY/HARM!
k) In REITERATING Newsome’s DEMAND at Page 7 and Paragraph 7 of “RT06-14-
12EEOCLetter,” Newsome DEMANDS to be advised of the:
“STATUS” of the MANDATORY issuance of COMMISSIONER CHARGE
of this instant Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Complaint/Charge
pursuant to 29 CFR § 1601.6 and other statutes/laws governing said matters.
Newsome’s Complaint/Charge and the issues brought through
pleadings/documents provided clearly support the issuance of COMMISSIONER
Charge. In support of the Equal Employment Commission's KNOWLEDGE that
Newsome’s Complaint/Charge and request set forth therein for the issuance of
COMMISSIONER CHARGE, information may be obtained at the following
links:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/commissioner-charge-systematic-task-
force-reporteeoc-highlighted
l) Secretary Solis it is UNDISPUTED that in accordance with the EEOC Guidelines governing
said matters that Newsome is ENTITLED to IMMEDIATE payment of Back Wages of
approximately $29,400 and does NOT have to wait until the completion of this matter;
moreover, yours, the EEOC and President Barack Obama’s efforts to wait until she has
EXHAUSTED her UNEMPLOYMENT Benefits!
m) UNDISPUTED is the fact that the record evidence supports/sustains “INDIVIDUAL” and
“SYSTEMATIC” DISCRIMINATORY practices leveled AGAINST Vogel Denise
Newsome and, therefore, warranting COMMISSIONER CHARGE to issue pursuant to 29
CFR § 1601.6 and other statutes/laws governing said matters . Please advise
Newsome whether or not the COMMISSIONER CHARGE that is also MANDATORILY
required to issue has been implemented. See also “RFROD&NOR. . .” Page 38 at Section
VII (REQUEST OF STATUS OF COMMISSIONER CHARGE TO ISSUE) as well as
Pages 4 – 6 at Section I.
EEOC Document: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/commissioner-
charge-systematic-task-force-reporteeoc-highlighted
WHEREFORE, PREMISES considered, Newsome is DEMANDING that Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis
provide her with a “WRITTEN RESPONSE” by TUESDAY, October 16, 2012, to this instant submittal and
advises that she does NOT waive any rights to have this matter DEFERRED to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission
and DEMANDS that the COMMISSIONER CHARGE issue in this matter.
Page 8 of 9