This document is an amicus brief in support of Mingo Logan Coal Company's motion for summary judgment against the EPA. It argues that EPA's use of its Clean Water Act Section 404(c) authority to modify a Section 404 permit already issued by the Army Corps of Engineers sets an unprecedented and disruptive precedent. It asserts that this action by EPA introduces tremendous uncertainty for all current and future Section 404 permit holders, increasing costs and risks and deterring important economic investment and development that requires Section 404 permits. The amicus brief represents a broad coalition of industry groups dependent on Section 404 permitting, and contends EPA's action threatens substantial negative economic impacts.
Wind_Energy_Law_2014_Amanda James _Avoiding Regulatory Missteps for Developer...Amanda James
This document discusses various regulatory considerations for wind energy projects, including:
1) Permitting regulations at the federal, state, and local levels that address environmental impacts, site plans, and other approval requirements.
2) The need to comply with local land use and zoning laws, which can restrict turbine placements. Obtaining local approval is often crucial.
3) Additional requirements like adhering to FAA guidelines on lighting and radar interference, considering impacts to historic and cultural resources, and analyzing effects on federal farm programs and contracted land.
Summary of New Rules for Horizontal Drilling in West Virginia, as of July 1, ...Marcellus Drilling News
A summary of the new rules drillers in WV have to follow--rules that have been developed over the past two years. This summary of the changes and new rules is provided by the WV law firm Lewis Glasser Casey & Rollins, PLLC.
On June 21, 2016, United States District Judge Scott Skavdahl granted BakerHostetler’s petition for review of final agency action and declared the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) hydraulic fracturing rule unlawful. The court’s judgment sets aside BLM’s hydraulic fracturing rule.
Earthjustice Petition Against Agribusiness Development CorporationHonolulu Civil Beat
This document is a petition filed with the Commission on Water Resource Management of Hawaii. It seeks to amend the interim instream flow standards for Waimea River and its tributaries on Kauai, and requests a declaratory order against waste. The petition was filed by the Po'ai Wai Ola/West Kauai Watershed Alliance and describes the natural and cultural significance of the Waimea River system. It provides background on diversions from the river for sugar plantation operations. The petition presents USGS stream flow data and discusses impacts of diversions and waste on instream uses like habitat and offstream uses. It requests that the Commission order cessation of waste and amend interim standards to restore flows in the river
This document discusses several bills proposed in the 112th Congress that aimed to roll back clean water protections. It outlines key provisions of H.R. 2018, called the "Dirtiest Water Bill", which would limit the federal government and EPA's authority to enforce clean water standards and protect water quality. The document also notes that appropriation levels for environmental programs have been declining and lists several amendments proposed to attach regulations and funding for clean water and Great Lakes restoration efforts.
The final version of a guidance from the federal Environmental Protection Agency establishing a definition for what is and is not diesel fuel for the purposes of evaluating whether that substance can be allowed in fracking fluid.
“The ordinary man is much more likely to the right thing if he really understands why he is doing it, and what will probably happen if he does something else; and the best basis for sound judgment is a knowledge of what has been done in the past, and with what results.”
--- Sir John Cotesworth Slessor, Marshal of the Royal Air Force, GCB, DSO, MC, Senior Commander, Royal Air Force, Chief of the Air Staff from 1950 to 1952
This document summarizes the key compliance challenges with California's Construction General Permit. It discusses the background and requirements of the permit, including filing permit documents, developing stormwater pollution prevention plans, and electronic reporting. It outlines the state and federal regulatory frameworks for water quality permits. It also describes enforcement procedures such as inspections, notices of violation, and penalties. Overall, the document provides an overview of the construction stormwater permit requirements and compliance processes in California.
Wind_Energy_Law_2014_Amanda James _Avoiding Regulatory Missteps for Developer...Amanda James
This document discusses various regulatory considerations for wind energy projects, including:
1) Permitting regulations at the federal, state, and local levels that address environmental impacts, site plans, and other approval requirements.
2) The need to comply with local land use and zoning laws, which can restrict turbine placements. Obtaining local approval is often crucial.
3) Additional requirements like adhering to FAA guidelines on lighting and radar interference, considering impacts to historic and cultural resources, and analyzing effects on federal farm programs and contracted land.
Summary of New Rules for Horizontal Drilling in West Virginia, as of July 1, ...Marcellus Drilling News
A summary of the new rules drillers in WV have to follow--rules that have been developed over the past two years. This summary of the changes and new rules is provided by the WV law firm Lewis Glasser Casey & Rollins, PLLC.
On June 21, 2016, United States District Judge Scott Skavdahl granted BakerHostetler’s petition for review of final agency action and declared the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) hydraulic fracturing rule unlawful. The court’s judgment sets aside BLM’s hydraulic fracturing rule.
Earthjustice Petition Against Agribusiness Development CorporationHonolulu Civil Beat
This document is a petition filed with the Commission on Water Resource Management of Hawaii. It seeks to amend the interim instream flow standards for Waimea River and its tributaries on Kauai, and requests a declaratory order against waste. The petition was filed by the Po'ai Wai Ola/West Kauai Watershed Alliance and describes the natural and cultural significance of the Waimea River system. It provides background on diversions from the river for sugar plantation operations. The petition presents USGS stream flow data and discusses impacts of diversions and waste on instream uses like habitat and offstream uses. It requests that the Commission order cessation of waste and amend interim standards to restore flows in the river
This document discusses several bills proposed in the 112th Congress that aimed to roll back clean water protections. It outlines key provisions of H.R. 2018, called the "Dirtiest Water Bill", which would limit the federal government and EPA's authority to enforce clean water standards and protect water quality. The document also notes that appropriation levels for environmental programs have been declining and lists several amendments proposed to attach regulations and funding for clean water and Great Lakes restoration efforts.
The final version of a guidance from the federal Environmental Protection Agency establishing a definition for what is and is not diesel fuel for the purposes of evaluating whether that substance can be allowed in fracking fluid.
“The ordinary man is much more likely to the right thing if he really understands why he is doing it, and what will probably happen if he does something else; and the best basis for sound judgment is a knowledge of what has been done in the past, and with what results.”
--- Sir John Cotesworth Slessor, Marshal of the Royal Air Force, GCB, DSO, MC, Senior Commander, Royal Air Force, Chief of the Air Staff from 1950 to 1952
This document summarizes the key compliance challenges with California's Construction General Permit. It discusses the background and requirements of the permit, including filing permit documents, developing stormwater pollution prevention plans, and electronic reporting. It outlines the state and federal regulatory frameworks for water quality permits. It also describes enforcement procedures such as inspections, notices of violation, and penalties. Overall, the document provides an overview of the construction stormwater permit requirements and compliance processes in California.
Nick Ivanoff, president and CEO of Ammann & Whitney and senior vice chairman of the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA), testified before the House Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment regarding EPA's expanded interpretation of its permit veto authority under the Clean Water Act. He expressed concerns that EPA's retroactive veto of an issued section 404 permit undermines predictability and fairness in the permitting process. This increased uncertainty could jeopardize transportation project planning, financing, and delivery. ARTBA supports legislation to curb EPA's ability to retroactively veto valid permits and restore certainty for transportation construction.
A 119-page response submitted by Brad Gill, Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York to the NY Dept. of Environmental Conservation about the DEC's latest revision to draft fracking rules for the state. The IOGA response is highly critical of the new revisions and makes detailed recommendations on how to fix the proposed rules to ensure drilling actually happens in NY. According to IOGA, they are forced to now be "adversarial" in their stance after working closely with the DEC over the past 4.5 years on this issue.
OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.Marcellus Drilling News
Decision by the Ohio Supreme Court in a case striking down so-called "home rule" laws in which local municipalities try to prevent shale drilling by enacting local zoning regulations. The court found that according to OH law, the state and only the state may regulate where and when drilling is done. A huge victory for both landowners and the shale industry in the Buckeye State.
A response sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in June 2016 by Rio Grande LNG. The request asks FERC to reject numerous requests for "intervenor" status by antis who desire nothing more than to slow down the FERC approval process. Rio Grande says the applications are incomplete and should be rejected.
Friends of the Willamette has filed a lawsuit against WhyChang? alleging violations of its NPDES permit and various environmental laws. The memo analyzes WC's NPDES permit status, the scope of permit protections, and potential enforcement consequences. It finds that WC's permit remains valid, but some discharges may fall outside protections. Significant civil penalties are possible for violations, though some defenses like lack of notice may apply.
Revised regulations from the Dept. of Interiori's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that will govern how and when fracking happens on the 700 million acres of federally owned land, mostly in the Western United States. The BLM oversees a huge amount of land with some 92,000 oil and gas wells on its property. The new rules tighten reporting of fracking chemicals and the way cement is used to protect holes drilled to retrieve oil and gas.
An appeal filed by the odious anti-drilling Big Green groups Clean Air Council (from Philadelphia) and Environmental Integrity Project (from Washington, DC) to block an air quality permit granted to Shell for a potential ethane cracker to be built in Pittsburgh, PA--more than 250 miles from either of those cities.
Federal Energy Regulatory approval and certificate that allows the Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company to build their System Reliability Project--to construct and operate facilities in New Castle, Kent and Sussex counties in DE.
This document summarizes a proposed rule by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service to amend their regulations defining "destruction or adverse modification" of critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act. The current regulatory definition was found invalid by federal courts for being inconsistent with the Act. The proposed rule would replace the invalidated definition with one consistent with the Act and court opinions that critical habitat is intended to promote both the survival and recovery of listed species. Public comments will be accepted on the proposed rule and two other related documents until July 11, 2014.
U.S. Bureau of Land Management New Rules for Fracking on Federally-Owned LandsMarcellus Drilling News
Newly proposed rules, released on May 4 by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management that will govern hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian-owned lands in the U.S. The new rules require all chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing to be publically disclosed, rules for how wells are cased, and rules requiring drillers to get plans pre-approved for wastewater disposal.
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Bureau of Land Management's final rule regarding hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian lands:
1) It improves public disclosure of fracturing operations and chemicals used while protecting trade secrets. Operators must disclose details to BLM and the public, using FracFocus.
2) It strengthens well construction standards to ensure integrity and protect water resources, requiring cement evaluation and remediation if needed.
3) It provides for interim storage of recovered fluids in closed tanks to contain them, with limited exceptions.
4) It aims to increase oversight and transparency without undue delays or costs for operators.
Regulation of Marine Renewables in the US: A 15 Minute Encapsulationguest0c28de
This document summarizes the complex regulation of marine renewable energy development in the United States. Key points include:
- Regulation is complicated due to both state and national interests being involved.
- The main regulatory bodies are NOAA, MMS, and FERC, and their jurisdictions vary depending on the type of marine renewable technology (e.g. offshore wind, wave, tidal) and distance from shore.
- MMS and FERC have different approaches and rules regarding leasing/permitting areas on the Outer Continental Shelf or involving both state and federal waters.
- The document outlines some options for streamlining regulation to help marine renewable technologies progress, such as one-stop shopping, stream
A quarterly publication from the Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA) and the PIRA Energy Group. It recounts the latest battles by out-of-control environmentalists in their attempts to kill fossil fuels by demagoging and litigating against the miracle of hydraulic fracturing and shale drilling throughout the U.S. An excellent summary/rundown of the latest skirmishes in the fracking wars.
Delaware Riverkeeper v Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection - Leidy...Marcellus Drilling News
This document summarizes a court case involving petitions challenging permits issued by New Jersey and Pennsylvania environmental agencies for a pipeline expansion project. The court consolidated two petitions - one challenging NJ permits and one challenging a PA permit. The court determined it had jurisdiction to review the permits and that the state environmental agencies did not act arbitrarily in issuing the permits, so it denied the petitions. The project is now mostly completed in New Jersey.
Railroad Commission of Texas - Regulations for Geologic Storage of Carbon Dio...Global CCS Institute
As a part of the Institute's strategic focus on assisting CCS projects through knowledge sharing, three North American roadshow events will help the industry share project experiences and knowledge about CCS. Taking place in the US and Canada, the three events include:
• Austin, Texas on November 8, 2011;
• Calgary, Canada on 10 November, 2011; and
• Washington, D.C. on 19 January, 2012.
The first roadshow focused on sharing project experiences and knowledge from the projects in North America but also brought in projects from Europe (Don valley) and Australia (Callide) so that regionally diverse experiences could be shared amongst a global audience.
Attendance at the event was around 30 to 35 which allowed open and frank discussions around technical, management, and regulatory issues and how these challenges can impact on a project’s advancement and decision making processes.
This document is a complaint filed by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its Administrator in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. ARTBA is challenging EPA's denial of two rulemaking petitions submitted by ARTBA regarding the preemptive scope of the Clean Air Act regarding emissions from nonroad vehicles and engines. ARTBA seeks declaratory and injunctive relief requiring EPA to revise its rules and policies to conform with ARTBA's interpretation of the Clean Air Act.
Swim Drink Fish's Preliminary Submission on Pickering Nuclear Generating StationLOWaterkeeper
Here is Swim Drink Fish’s preliminary submission to the CNSC Tribunal as it reviews the PNGS licence conditions. OPG withholds vital information about the PNGS’ environmental impacts needed for Swim Drink Fish’s complete submission.
Big changes have already hit the construction industry in California in the form of a new Industrial Storm Water General Permit, but even more changes are looming. The State Water Resources Control Board is working on a new permitting process for protecting “waters of the state.” Learn the latest on this important regulatory front and how it may impact your operations.
This document is a draft specification from April 1997 by the U.S. Army for collapsible fabric water storage tanks holding 3000 gallons. It provides requirements for the materials, construction, and performance of the tanks. The tanks must be made of compatible and corrosion resistant materials approved for potable water use. The document specifies tests for the coated fabric and seams used in construction. The tanks must withstand various temperatures and humidity without damage and provide potable water storage for 90 days without leakage.
The document provides information about advertising opportunities with the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). It details the size and influence of the transportation construction market in the US. It also outlines ARTBA's print and digital publications that reach over 14,000 transportation industry professionals, and provides advertising rates and specifications. Key advertising options include placements in ARTBA's magazine, website, and weekly digital newsletter.
This document summarizes an issue of the publication "Transportation Builder" from September/October 2016. The cover story discusses the launch of the new "Safety Certification for Transportation Project Professionals" (SCTPP) certification program developed by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The program aims to make all transportation construction projects worldwide zero-incident zones. It is designed specifically for the transportation industry and was developed by industry safety experts. Thousands of transportation professionals will be eligible for the certification, which covers a wide range of safety topics. ARTBA chairman David Zachry expresses support for the new program and thanks those involved in its creation.
More Related Content
Similar to 06/03/11: Amicus Brief Opposing EPA Wetlands Permit Veto
Nick Ivanoff, president and CEO of Ammann & Whitney and senior vice chairman of the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA), testified before the House Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment regarding EPA's expanded interpretation of its permit veto authority under the Clean Water Act. He expressed concerns that EPA's retroactive veto of an issued section 404 permit undermines predictability and fairness in the permitting process. This increased uncertainty could jeopardize transportation project planning, financing, and delivery. ARTBA supports legislation to curb EPA's ability to retroactively veto valid permits and restore certainty for transportation construction.
A 119-page response submitted by Brad Gill, Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York to the NY Dept. of Environmental Conservation about the DEC's latest revision to draft fracking rules for the state. The IOGA response is highly critical of the new revisions and makes detailed recommendations on how to fix the proposed rules to ensure drilling actually happens in NY. According to IOGA, they are forced to now be "adversarial" in their stance after working closely with the DEC over the past 4.5 years on this issue.
OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.Marcellus Drilling News
Decision by the Ohio Supreme Court in a case striking down so-called "home rule" laws in which local municipalities try to prevent shale drilling by enacting local zoning regulations. The court found that according to OH law, the state and only the state may regulate where and when drilling is done. A huge victory for both landowners and the shale industry in the Buckeye State.
A response sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in June 2016 by Rio Grande LNG. The request asks FERC to reject numerous requests for "intervenor" status by antis who desire nothing more than to slow down the FERC approval process. Rio Grande says the applications are incomplete and should be rejected.
Friends of the Willamette has filed a lawsuit against WhyChang? alleging violations of its NPDES permit and various environmental laws. The memo analyzes WC's NPDES permit status, the scope of permit protections, and potential enforcement consequences. It finds that WC's permit remains valid, but some discharges may fall outside protections. Significant civil penalties are possible for violations, though some defenses like lack of notice may apply.
Revised regulations from the Dept. of Interiori's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that will govern how and when fracking happens on the 700 million acres of federally owned land, mostly in the Western United States. The BLM oversees a huge amount of land with some 92,000 oil and gas wells on its property. The new rules tighten reporting of fracking chemicals and the way cement is used to protect holes drilled to retrieve oil and gas.
An appeal filed by the odious anti-drilling Big Green groups Clean Air Council (from Philadelphia) and Environmental Integrity Project (from Washington, DC) to block an air quality permit granted to Shell for a potential ethane cracker to be built in Pittsburgh, PA--more than 250 miles from either of those cities.
Federal Energy Regulatory approval and certificate that allows the Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company to build their System Reliability Project--to construct and operate facilities in New Castle, Kent and Sussex counties in DE.
This document summarizes a proposed rule by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service to amend their regulations defining "destruction or adverse modification" of critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act. The current regulatory definition was found invalid by federal courts for being inconsistent with the Act. The proposed rule would replace the invalidated definition with one consistent with the Act and court opinions that critical habitat is intended to promote both the survival and recovery of listed species. Public comments will be accepted on the proposed rule and two other related documents until July 11, 2014.
U.S. Bureau of Land Management New Rules for Fracking on Federally-Owned LandsMarcellus Drilling News
Newly proposed rules, released on May 4 by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management that will govern hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian-owned lands in the U.S. The new rules require all chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing to be publically disclosed, rules for how wells are cased, and rules requiring drillers to get plans pre-approved for wastewater disposal.
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Bureau of Land Management's final rule regarding hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian lands:
1) It improves public disclosure of fracturing operations and chemicals used while protecting trade secrets. Operators must disclose details to BLM and the public, using FracFocus.
2) It strengthens well construction standards to ensure integrity and protect water resources, requiring cement evaluation and remediation if needed.
3) It provides for interim storage of recovered fluids in closed tanks to contain them, with limited exceptions.
4) It aims to increase oversight and transparency without undue delays or costs for operators.
Regulation of Marine Renewables in the US: A 15 Minute Encapsulationguest0c28de
This document summarizes the complex regulation of marine renewable energy development in the United States. Key points include:
- Regulation is complicated due to both state and national interests being involved.
- The main regulatory bodies are NOAA, MMS, and FERC, and their jurisdictions vary depending on the type of marine renewable technology (e.g. offshore wind, wave, tidal) and distance from shore.
- MMS and FERC have different approaches and rules regarding leasing/permitting areas on the Outer Continental Shelf or involving both state and federal waters.
- The document outlines some options for streamlining regulation to help marine renewable technologies progress, such as one-stop shopping, stream
A quarterly publication from the Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA) and the PIRA Energy Group. It recounts the latest battles by out-of-control environmentalists in their attempts to kill fossil fuels by demagoging and litigating against the miracle of hydraulic fracturing and shale drilling throughout the U.S. An excellent summary/rundown of the latest skirmishes in the fracking wars.
Delaware Riverkeeper v Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection - Leidy...Marcellus Drilling News
This document summarizes a court case involving petitions challenging permits issued by New Jersey and Pennsylvania environmental agencies for a pipeline expansion project. The court consolidated two petitions - one challenging NJ permits and one challenging a PA permit. The court determined it had jurisdiction to review the permits and that the state environmental agencies did not act arbitrarily in issuing the permits, so it denied the petitions. The project is now mostly completed in New Jersey.
Railroad Commission of Texas - Regulations for Geologic Storage of Carbon Dio...Global CCS Institute
As a part of the Institute's strategic focus on assisting CCS projects through knowledge sharing, three North American roadshow events will help the industry share project experiences and knowledge about CCS. Taking place in the US and Canada, the three events include:
• Austin, Texas on November 8, 2011;
• Calgary, Canada on 10 November, 2011; and
• Washington, D.C. on 19 January, 2012.
The first roadshow focused on sharing project experiences and knowledge from the projects in North America but also brought in projects from Europe (Don valley) and Australia (Callide) so that regionally diverse experiences could be shared amongst a global audience.
Attendance at the event was around 30 to 35 which allowed open and frank discussions around technical, management, and regulatory issues and how these challenges can impact on a project’s advancement and decision making processes.
This document is a complaint filed by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its Administrator in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. ARTBA is challenging EPA's denial of two rulemaking petitions submitted by ARTBA regarding the preemptive scope of the Clean Air Act regarding emissions from nonroad vehicles and engines. ARTBA seeks declaratory and injunctive relief requiring EPA to revise its rules and policies to conform with ARTBA's interpretation of the Clean Air Act.
Swim Drink Fish's Preliminary Submission on Pickering Nuclear Generating StationLOWaterkeeper
Here is Swim Drink Fish’s preliminary submission to the CNSC Tribunal as it reviews the PNGS licence conditions. OPG withholds vital information about the PNGS’ environmental impacts needed for Swim Drink Fish’s complete submission.
Big changes have already hit the construction industry in California in the form of a new Industrial Storm Water General Permit, but even more changes are looming. The State Water Resources Control Board is working on a new permitting process for protecting “waters of the state.” Learn the latest on this important regulatory front and how it may impact your operations.
This document is a draft specification from April 1997 by the U.S. Army for collapsible fabric water storage tanks holding 3000 gallons. It provides requirements for the materials, construction, and performance of the tanks. The tanks must be made of compatible and corrosion resistant materials approved for potable water use. The document specifies tests for the coated fabric and seams used in construction. The tanks must withstand various temperatures and humidity without damage and provide potable water storage for 90 days without leakage.
Similar to 06/03/11: Amicus Brief Opposing EPA Wetlands Permit Veto (20)
The document provides information about advertising opportunities with the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). It details the size and influence of the transportation construction market in the US. It also outlines ARTBA's print and digital publications that reach over 14,000 transportation industry professionals, and provides advertising rates and specifications. Key advertising options include placements in ARTBA's magazine, website, and weekly digital newsletter.
This document summarizes an issue of the publication "Transportation Builder" from September/October 2016. The cover story discusses the launch of the new "Safety Certification for Transportation Project Professionals" (SCTPP) certification program developed by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The program aims to make all transportation construction projects worldwide zero-incident zones. It is designed specifically for the transportation industry and was developed by industry safety experts. Thousands of transportation professionals will be eligible for the certification, which covers a wide range of safety topics. ARTBA chairman David Zachry expresses support for the new program and thanks those involved in its creation.
The document summarizes the July/August 2016 issue of the Transportation Builder magazine published by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The issue previews ARTBA's annual convention in Tucson, Arizona in October 2016 which will focus on transportation construction safety and feature speakers on business and aviation. It also advertises transportation construction equipment, products, and services.
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016artba
The document outlines the schedule for the National Work Zone Management Conference taking place from September 20-22 in Springfield, Virginia. The conference consists of multiple tracks of sessions covering topics such as work zone safety certification, signage and lighting, crash characteristics and countermeasures, quality of work zone markings, accommodating pedestrians and bicyclists, and new technologies including autonomous and connected vehicles. There will also be presentations on coordinating multiple work zones, real-time monitoring using ITS, and preventing work zone intrusions from the contractor's perspective. An opening luncheon will feature a panel on autonomous and connected vehicles in work zones.
This document provides information about the 2016 ARTBA National Convention being held from October 4-6 at the JW Marriott Tucson Starr Pass Resort & Spa in Tucson, Arizona. The convention will focus on putting safety first and will feature presentations on new safety certification programs and discussions on transportation policy and business topics. The document outlines the schedule of events, list of sponsors, and information about the host hotel and exhibitors.
This document is the May/June 2016 issue of Transportation Builder, the official publication of the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The issue focuses on transportation construction safety. It includes articles on ARTBA's new safety certificate training course, innovations in mobile barriers that provide positive separation for workers, and using technology to detect and repair potholes. The chairman's letter expresses ARTBA's continued commitment to transportation worker safety and previews a major new safety initiative to be announced at the upcoming ARTBA National Convention.
The summary is:
The 2016 Northeastern Regional Meeting will take place November 2-4 at the Borgata Hotel in Atlantic City, NJ. The agenda includes registration, networking events, presentations on innovative transportation technologies, workshops, panels on the state of the transportation industry, and updates from regional transportation organizations. Presentation topics will cover drones, autonomous vehicles, transportation construction market trends, and policy issues. Representatives from the Port Authority of NY/NJ, New Jersey DOT, and state contractors associations will also provide information.
The 2016 Southern Regional Meeting will take place from October 26-28 at the Ritz Carlton in New Orleans, LA. The agenda includes presentations and panel discussions on topics such as the impact of artificial intelligence on the construction industry, the state of transportation design and construction in the South, and state and federal transportation policy and market updates. Events include a first-time attendee networking event, opening and networking receptions, breakfasts and luncheons, and presentations from transportation officials and industry leaders. The meeting will provide an opportunity for transportation construction professionals in the Southern region to network, learn, and discuss important issues facing the industry.
The 2016 Central Regional Meeting will take place from November 2-4 at the Hyatt Regency McCormick Place in Chicago, Illinois. The meeting will include presentations and panel discussions on topics like the future transportation workforce and millennials, the state of the transportation industry in the central region, and transportation policy updates. There will also be opportunities for networking through various receptions and breakfast/lunch events. The meeting aims to bring together transportation construction professionals from the central United States to discuss current issues and opportunities in the industry.
The 2016 Western Regional Meeting will take place from October 26-28 at the Hilton in Austin, Texas. The agenda includes presentations and panel discussions on topics such as autonomous vehicles and their impact on infrastructure, the state of the transportation design and construction industry in the West, and transportation policy updates. There will also be opportunities for networking through various receptions and breaks during the three-day conference.
The 2016 Western Regional Meeting will take place from October 26-28 in Austin, Texas at the Hilton hotel. The agenda includes presentations and panel discussions on topics like autonomous vehicles and their impact on infrastructure, the state of the transportation design and construction industry in the West, and transportation policy updates. There will also be opportunities for networking through various receptions and meals. The meeting will conclude on Friday after presentations from the Texas Department of Transportation, an economic report, and state chapter affiliates.
The article discusses bridge infrastructure in the United States. It provides an overview of some recent bridge projects across the country, including projects in Chicago and Woodbridge Township, New Jersey that are repairing structurally deficient bridges. It also discusses Pennsylvania's efforts to address its large number of structurally deficient bridges. Additionally, it summarizes ARTBA's recent report that found over 61,000 structurally deficient bridges nationwide still need repair, though the number has decreased by over 2,000 from the previous year. The article encourages passage of a long-term transportation bill to provide increased and more stable funding for bridge repairs and replacements.
The document is the September-October 2015 issue of Transportation Builder, the official publication of the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). It includes articles on ARTBA's advocacy efforts to pass a long-term surface transportation bill, safety initiatives, engaging young professionals, and the upcoming Dr. J. Don Brock TransOvation workshop. It also previews the 12th annual "Through the Lens" photo feature showcasing transportation construction projects.
The document discusses a new cutter bit called the GENERATION X from Wirtgen Rhino Parts. It reduces operating costs through longer life and downtime through greater reliability. Its carbide shape maximizes production and carbide utilization. The heavy-duty wear ring minimizes toolholder wear and improves protection while optimizing bit rotation. Wirtgen Rhino Parts produces consistent, high-quality products through precision manufacturing.
This document is the January-February 2016 issue of Transportation Builder, the official publication of the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). It discusses several key issues and priorities for ARTBA in 2016, including:
1) Ensuring full funding of the surface transportation programs authorized in the FAST Act and obtaining long-term, increased funding for airport capital programs and the prevention of excessive regulatory actions.
2) ARTBA's strategic plan to engage the next generation of industry leaders, including rebranding the Young Executive Development Program as the Industry Leader Development Program and the Young Executive Leadership Council as the Industry Leader Development Council.
3) A new study showing that the Highway Trust Fund faces an annual $18
This issue of Transportation Builder focuses on bridges and airports. It provides information on 10 bridge projects and 14 airport construction projects across the U.S., including both new construction and rehabilitation of bridges and major capital work like terminals and runways at airports. Some of the projects are complete while others are still under construction, and some airport work remains planned. The issue also introduces a new Q&A feature interviewing a woman leader in transportation and highlights innovations from ARTBA's Research and Education Division.
This document outlines the schedule for a transportation construction industry conference held over three days. It lists over 30 different meetings, presentations, and events taking place during sessions on topics such as public-private partnerships, contracting, research and education, and legislative affairs. Sponsorship levels for the conference are also identified, ranging from platinum to silver to exhibitor levels.
This document contains the schedule and agenda for the 2016 ARTBA Federal Issues Program & Transportation Construction Coalition Fly-In event taking place from May 9-11 at the Hyatt Regency Washington Hotel. The schedule details the times and locations for various meetings, presentations, and legislative sessions focused on federal transportation issues. Sponsorship levels and participating organizations are also listed.
This document outlines the agenda and schedule for the 2016 Industry Leader Development Program hosted by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association. The program will provide an introduction to transportation infrastructure advocacy through presentations and discussions on topics such as transportation funding, the federal aid highway program, regulations, public-private partnerships, and meeting with congressional representatives. It will take place over two and a half days and include sessions, networking opportunities, and a reception on Capitol Hill.
The document is a program for the 2016 ARTBA P3s in Transportation Conference. It includes schedules, speakers, sessions and sponsors. The conference will feature discussions on public-private partnerships in transportation, international best practices, federal resources for P3s, and perspectives from Congress, state legislatures and the transportation industry. It will also include breakout sessions on emerging P3 markets, project protections, research developments, and impacts of the FAST Act.
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...BBPMedia1
Nathalie zal delen hoe DEI en ESG een fundamentele rol kunnen spelen in je merkstrategie en je de juiste aansluiting kan creëren met je doelgroep. Door middel van voorbeelden en simpele handvatten toont ze hoe dit in jouw organisatie toegepast kan worden.
Profiles of Iconic Fashion Personalities.pdfTTop Threads
The fashion industry is dynamic and ever-changing, continuously sculpted by trailblazing visionaries who challenge norms and redefine beauty. This document delves into the profiles of some of the most iconic fashion personalities whose impact has left a lasting impression on the industry. From timeless designers to modern-day influencers, each individual has uniquely woven their thread into the rich fabric of fashion history, contributing to its ongoing evolution.
The APCO Geopolitical Radar - Q3 2024 The Global Operating Environment for Bu...APCO
The Radar reflects input from APCO’s teams located around the world. It distils a host of interconnected events and trends into insights to inform operational and strategic decisions. Issues covered in this edition include:
Navigating the world of forex trading can be challenging, especially for beginners. To help you make an informed decision, we have comprehensively compared the best forex brokers in India for 2024. This article, reviewed by Top Forex Brokers Review, will cover featured award winners, the best forex brokers, featured offers, the best copy trading platforms, the best forex brokers for beginners, the best MetaTrader brokers, and recently updated reviews. We will focus on FP Markets, Black Bull, EightCap, IC Markets, and Octa.
IMPACT Silver is a pure silver zinc producer with over $260 million in revenue since 2008 and a large 100% owned 210km Mexico land package - 2024 catalysts includes new 14% grade zinc Plomosas mine and 20,000m of fully funded exploration drilling.
SATTA MATKA SATTA FAST RESULT KALYAN TOP MATKA RESULT KALYAN SATTA MATKA FAST RESULT MILAN RATAN RAJDHANI MAIN BAZAR MATKA FAST TIPS RESULT MATKA CHART JODI CHART PANEL CHART FREE FIX GAME SATTAMATKA ! MATKA MOBI SATTA 143 spboss.in TOP NO1 RESULT FULL RATE MATKA ONLINE GAME PLAY BY APP SPBOSS
Discover innovative uses of Revit in urban planning and design, enhancing city landscapes with advanced architectural solutions. Understand how architectural firms are using Revit to transform how processes and outcomes within urban planning and design fields look. They are supplementing work and putting in value through speed and imagination that the architects and planners are placing into composing progressive urban areas that are not only colorful but also pragmatic.
Dive into this presentation and learn about the ways in which you can buy an engagement ring. This guide will help you choose the perfect engagement rings for women.
Digital Marketing with a Focus on Sustainabilitysssourabhsharma
Digital Marketing best practices including influencer marketing, content creators, and omnichannel marketing for Sustainable Brands at the Sustainable Cosmetics Summit 2024 in New York
The Steadfast and Reliable Bull: Taurus Zodiac Signmy Pandit
Explore the steadfast and reliable nature of the Taurus Zodiac Sign. Discover the personality traits, key dates, and horoscope insights that define the determined and practical Taurus, and learn how their grounded nature makes them the anchor of the zodiac.
𝐔𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐢𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐄𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐲 𝐄𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐄𝐖𝐍𝐓𝐈𝐃𝐄’𝐬 𝐋𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬
Explore the details in our newly released product manual, which showcases NEWNTIDE's advanced heat pump technologies. Delve into our energy-efficient and eco-friendly solutions tailored for diverse global markets.
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...Herman Kienhuis
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on developments in AI, the venture capital investment landscape and Curiosity VC's approach to investing, at the alumni event of Amsterdam Business School (University of Amsterdam) on June 13, 2024 in Amsterdam.
Part 2 Deep Dive: Navigating the 2024 Slowdownjeffkluth1
Introduction
The global retail industry has weathered numerous storms, with the financial crisis of 2008 serving as a poignant reminder of the sector's resilience and adaptability. However, as we navigate the complex landscape of 2024, retailers face a unique set of challenges that demand innovative strategies and a fundamental shift in mindset. This white paper contrasts the impact of the 2008 recession on the retail sector with the current headwinds retailers are grappling with, while offering a comprehensive roadmap for success in this new paradigm.
Industrial Tech SW: Category Renewal and CreationChristian Dahlen
Every industrial revolution has created a new set of categories and a new set of players.
Multiple new technologies have emerged, but Samsara and C3.ai are only two companies which have gone public so far.
Manufacturing startups constitute the largest pipeline share of unicorns and IPO candidates in the SF Bay Area, and software startups dominate in Germany.
The Genesis of BriansClub.cm Famous Dark WEb PlatformSabaaSudozai
BriansClub.cm, a famous platform on the dark web, has become one of the most infamous carding marketplaces, specializing in the sale of stolen credit card data.
Best Competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai - ☎ 9928909666Stone Art Hub
Stone Art Hub offers the best competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai, ensuring affordability without compromising quality. With a wide range of exquisite marble options to choose from, you can enhance your spaces with elegance and sophistication. For inquiries or orders, contact us at ☎ 9928909666. Experience luxury at unbeatable prices.
Brian Fitzsimmons on the Business Strategy and Content Flywheel of Barstool S...Neil Horowitz
On episode 272 of the Digital and Social Media Sports Podcast, Neil chatted with Brian Fitzsimmons, Director of Licensing and Business Development for Barstool Sports.
What follows is a collection of snippets from the podcast. To hear the full interview and more, check out the podcast on all podcast platforms and at www.dsmsports.net
1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MINGO LOGAN COAL CO., INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:10-cv-00541-ABJ
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF
Pursuant to the concurrently filed Motion for Leave, the amici curiae listed in that motion
respectfully submit this brief in support of Plaintiff Mingo Logan Coal Company (“Mingo
Logan”)’s motion for summary judgment.
INTRODUCTION
In January 2011, when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency published a “Final
Determination” purporting to unilaterally modify a Clean Water Act permit that had been issued
to Mingo Logan by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers four years earlier, its decision echoed far
beyond the coal mines in the mountains of West Virginia. Never before had EPA acted against a
Corps permit after it was issued. Now, suddenly, EPA is claiming the power to step in and alter
the terms of an existing Corps permit any time it determines that the project’s impacts are
“unacceptable”—even when the agency had previously reviewed the permit and assented to its
issuance, and even when the permit holder is in full compliance. If EPA has this authority to
revise or revoke Corps permits after they issue, over the objections of the Corps and the State,
Corps permit holders can no longer be sure that their current or future projects are safe from a
similar fate.
2. 2
The universe of projects contingent on Clean Water Act Section 404 permits issued by
the Corps is a significant part of the U.S. economy. Every year, the Corps’ Section 404
permitting program authorizes approximately $220 billion in economic investment. EPA’s
assertion that it has the authority to revise Section 404 permits after the Corps issues them
creates tremendous investment uncertainty for all permit holders and potential project
proponents.
Amici are a wide-ranging coalition of industry groups whose membership deals daily with
the necessity of obtaining permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act. They include: the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, the
National Association of Manufacturers, the American Road and Transportation Builders
Association, the Association of American Railroads, the National Association of Home Builders,
the American Farm Bureau Federation, the Fertilizer Institute, the National Council of Coal
Lessors, the Industrial Minerals Association – North America, the Utility Water Act Group, the
Foundation for Environmental and Economic Progress and the Western Business Roundtable.1
In light of EPA’s unprecedented efforts to modify Mingo Logan’s Section 404 permit, members
of each of these groups face significant investment uncertainty with respect to both the permits
they are currently holding and the permits they plan to acquire in the future. Inevitably, that
uncertainty will translate into higher risks in borrowing, less investment, lost jobs and slower
growth throughout the U.S. economy. These impacts are not mere speculation on the part of
industry. Dr. David Sunding, Professor in the Department of Agricultural and Resource
Economics at the University of California, Berkeley, has evaluated the economic impacts
associated with EPA’s actions and found them to be significant.
1
The specific interests of these amici are set forth in the accompanying motion for leave.
3. 3
Other than saying that it rarely uses authority under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water
Act, EPA has made little effort to justify its unprecedented and aggressive expansion of that
authority, much less to consider how its actions against Mingo Logan would affect financing and
economic investment by other Section 404 permit holders and permit applicants. Amici can
attest that allowing EPA to assert such unbridled authority with respect to previously issued
Section 404 permits risks substantial economic dislocations in a variety of industries.
Accordingly, amici urge the Court to stop EPA from arrogating the authority to modify Section
404 permits after they have been issued.
ARGUMENT
I. EPA’s unprecedented action represents a significant change to the established
system of permitting under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
A. Section 404 permits are used by amici in a wide variety of circumstances.
Virtually any economically significant activity in the United States, whether undertaken
by public or private entities, requires some sort of regulatory approval. For activities that
discharge fill material into waters of the United States (including wetlands), a project proponent
often must obtain a Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
As indicated by the variety of industries and interests represented by amici, the need for a
Section 404 permit can arise in a surprisingly broad range of circumstances. The Corps
estimates that more than $220 billion of investment each year is conditioned on the issuance of
these permits. All sorts of activities—construction of utility infrastructure, housing and
commercial development, renewable energy projects like wind farms or solar arrays, and
4. 4
transportation infrastructure projects such as highways and rail lines—frequently involve the
permitted filling of the broadly defined “waters of the United States.”2
Most project proponents that apply for Section 404 permits simply cannot avoid
impacting waters that fall under the Corps’ jurisdiction. The regulatory definition of “waters of
the U.S.” encompasses most everything from ponds to simple creeks or drains to virtually any
area where the soil is saturated by surface or groundwater. See 40 C.F.R. 230.3(s), (t). It would
be impossible to provide utility and electric service, transportation, housing, food, fiber or other
amenities in those places without affecting waters or wetlands. For this reason, investment in
many sectors hinges on the Section 404 permitting process. Amici represent a cross-section of
the industries that are making those investments. Accordingly, amici and their membership are
dependent not only on the availability of Section 404 permits, but also on the predictability of the
regulatory process.
B. EPA’s attempt to modify an already-issued Section 404 permit is
unprecedented.
Section 404(a) of the Clean Water Act authorizes the Secretary of the Army to “issue
permits . . . for the discharge of dredged or fill material into the navigable waters at specified
disposal sites.” 33 U.S.C. § 1344(a). The Corps of Engineers, as the Secretary’s delegatee, has
promulgated detailed regulations setting forth the substantive and procedural requirements for
obtaining these Section 404 permits. See 33 C.F.R. Parts 323, 325. After the Corps issues a
permit under those regulations, it retains authority to modify, suspend or revoke that permit
under certain circumstances, provided that it adheres to the established procedures for doing so.
2
EPA has recently issued draft guidance that advocates an even broader interpretation of
the term “waters of the United States.” See 76 Fed. Reg. 24479 (May 2, 2011).
5. 5
See 33 C.F.R. § 325.7.3
Most Corps permits explicitly state that they are subject to modification,
suspension or revocation under the terms of the Corps’ regulations.
This case, of course, turns on the scope of EPA’s authority under Section 404(c) of the
Clean Water Act. EPA asserts that it has exercised this power only 13 times since the Clean
Water Act became law in 1972. See Testimony of Nancy K. Stoner, Acting Asst. Admin., Office
of Water, before the Subcomm. on Water Res. and Env’t, U.S. House of Rep. Transp. and
Infrastructure Comm. (“Stoner Testimony”) at 4 (May 11, 2011), attached as Appendix B. It is
important to recognize, however, that the number of times EPA has formally acted pursuant to
Section 404(c) is but a “miniscule fraction” of the number of times it has “resolved issues” by
using the threat of such action to obtain concessions from the Corps or project proponents. Id. at
5. In other words, the sheer number of times that EPA has used its authority under Section
404(c) does not even begin to capture the influence that the agency can have on the Section 404
permitting process.
For present purposes, the important issue is not how many times EPA has acted under
Section 404(c), or how it wields influence during the permitting process. Instead, the key
point—the reason that amici are faced with a dramatic change in the Section 404 permitting
process—is that “EPA has never before used its Section 404(c) authority to review a previously
permitted project . . . .” Letter from William C. Early, Acting Regional Administrator, to
Colonel Robert D. Peterson, District Engineer (“Early Letter”) (Oct. 16, 2009), AR011906
3
The relevant regulations state that the Corps will consider several “factors” before
modifying, suspending or revoking a Corps permit, including: the extent of the permittee’s
compliance with the permit’s terms and conditions, a change in circumstances related to the
permitted activity, the continued adequacy of or need for permit conditions, significant
objections to the activity not already considered, revisions to applicable statutory or regulatory
authorities, and the extent to which the change in the permit would adversely the permittee’s
plans, investments or actions. See 33 C.F.R. § 325.7(a).
6. 6
(emphasis added); see also EPA Proposes Veto of Mine Permit Under Clean Water Act (March
26, 2010), AR000001 (EPA press release stating that the agency had “never” used its Section
404(c) authority “for a previously permitted project”). Permit holders and prospective project
proponents who once looked to the Corps’ regulations governing suspension, modification and
revocation (see 33 C.F.R. § 325.7) as the exclusive framework under which Section 404 permits
might be altered or amended now face a completely new and undefined threat to those permits
from EPA.4
EPA, for its part, has done little to describe—much less delimit—the circumstances under
which it might employ its newly asserted power to act against a previously issued permit. True,
EPA has offered repeated assurances that the use of its Section 404(c) authority is used
“sparingly” (Stoner Testimony at 4) and that it “is not contemplating the use of Section 404(c) on
any other previously permitted surface coal mining projects in Appalachia” (id. at 10). But the
agency’s legal position seems to be that it can use its authority under Section 404(c) to modify an
already-issued permit any time it believes that the permitted project has “unacceptable” impacts.
This is not a meaningful or workable standard for those who want to invest in projects requiring
a Section 404 permit.
4
Despite the agency’s prior clear statements to the contrary, EPA Assistant Administrator
Nancy K. Stoner recently claimed that the Spruce No. 1 Mine was actually “the second time that
EPA has used its authority under Section 404(c) to withdraw authorization to discharge under a
previously issued permit . . . .” Stoner Testimony at 9. Amici surmise that Assistant
Administrator Stoner was referring to EPA’s actions against a project in Florida more than thirty
years ago. In that case, the Corps had originally permitted a facility for recreational purposes
without objection from EPA. See 45 Fed. Reg. 51275, 51276 (Aug. 1, 1980). When the Corps
subsequently proposed issuing a new permit that would have allowed the facility to be turned
into a landfill, EPA used its Section 404(c) authority against that new permit. See id.; 46 Fed.
Reg. 10203 (Feb. 2, 1981). But regardless of how it is now interpreting events from the early
1980s, EPA’s statements in October 2009 and March 2010 reflect a consensus that, prior to the
agency’s actions against Mingo Logan’s permit, EPA had never attempted to use its Section
404(c) powers against a “previously permitted project.”
7. 7
Regardless of how rare EPA says these types of actions have been in the past, or how
frequently it asserts that the circumstances in the present case are exceptional, its clearly
expressed rationale is disconcerting, and reflects the agency’s view that its powers under Section
404(c) are essentially unconstrained. Apparently, EPA believes it has the prerogative to revisit
an already-issued Section 404 permit any time that the permitted project’s impacts strike it as
“unacceptable,” regardless of whether those impacts are mitigated. And now that EPA has
opened the door to using its Section 404(c) authority against permits previously issued, and
where the permit holder is in compliance, there is no way to predict when the agency’s vague,
standardless determination that a project’s impacts are unacceptable will cause it to target some
other permit or group of permits.
II. EPA’s actions in this case threaten to cause significant disruption throughout the
economy.
EPA’s unprecedented effort to modify Mingo Logan’s previously issued Section 404
permit has caused significant uncertainty for both holders of and applicants for Section 404
permits. Obtaining a Section 404 permit already imposes significant burdens on a project
proponent that must be factored into the project’s overall economic cost. The additional doubt
that EPA’s actions have cast over the long-term stability of those permits increases those
economic costs, thereby altering the incentives to invest in projects that must pass through the
Section 404 process.
A. The Section 404 permitting process imposes substantial costs on industry.
Virtually any project that could have an impact on the natural environment requires the
project proponent to make a significant capital investment months or even years before receiving
any return on that investment. On top of any capital outlays, the proponent must also take into
account the costs associated with obtaining necessary regulatory approvals, which often may
8. 8
include a Section 404 permit. Satisfying the applicable regulatory requirements is not only time
consuming, but also requires the applicant to generate—and provide the regulator with—a great
deal of information about the project. These regulatory process costs are just as real as any other
economic burden facing the project proponent. See David Sunding, Economic Incentive Effects
of EPA’s After-the-Fact Veto of a Section 404 Discharge Permit Issued to Arch Coal (“Sunding
Report”) at 7 (May 2011), attached as Appendix A.
An economically rational investor will not make decisions based simply on a ratio
comparing a project’s costs and benefits. Rather, it will factor into its analysis a calculation of
the “hurdle rate”—the expected rate of return necessary for the project’s benefits to exceed its
actual costs. Sunding Report at 7.5
Where there is uncertainty about the future costs and
benefits of the project, the investor will adjust the hurdle rate accordingly. Id. The greater the
risk, the higher the hurdle rate, and the more likely it becomes that the investment will be
delayed or deterred. See id. When regulatory process costs are predictable, they can facilitate
investment by lowering risk; when those costs are unpredictable because the regulatory process
is uncertain, investment is discouraged. See id. at 7-8. This deterrence effect is especially strong
in cases like this one, where the agency claims authority to revoke a permit despite the
permittee’s full compliance with the terms of that permit, thus leaving the permit holder without
any means of limiting or managing the risk of revocation. See id. at 8.
Under the system as it existed prior to EPA’s actions against Spruce No. 1 Mine, Section
404 permit applicants did not need to include in their hurdle rate calculations the risk that EPA
would modify or revoke a permit once it had been secured. When the Corps issued a permit, the
permit holder knew that the only way for it to be altered would be through the Corps’ regulations
9. 9
governing suspension, revocation and modification in 33 C.F.R. § 325.7. After EPA’s action
against Mingo Logan’s permit, however, permit holders face a new risk that EPA will attempt to
modify their Section 404 permit after it issues, based on factors that the agency has done almost
nothing to articulate. As Dr. Sunding shows, this threat causes a distortion in the benefit-cost
ratio of new investment projects. See Sunding Report at 8.
B. EPA’s attempt to use its Section 404(c) authority in this case will have a
significant adverse impact on the economy.
As already discussed, and as EPA has rightly acknowledged, the agency’s decision to
review the previously issued Section 404 permit for Spruce No. 1 Mine is without precedent. By
definition, it represents a change in the existing statutory and regulatory framework. Section 404
permit applicants accordingly must make adjustments to their cost-benefit calculations that take
into account the risk that EPA could exercise its newly-asserted power to modify previously
issued permits. These adjustments include not only the risk that EPA will formally exercise its
Section 404(c) authority against the permit authorizing an applicant’s proposed project, but also
the possibility that the agency someday may decide that an applicant’s project needs to be
changed or eliminated, and that it will use the threat of action under Section 404(c) to force the
implementation of its desired changes.
1. EPA’s regulatory actions will delay or deter investment in new projects.
Increasing the amount of uncertainty that surrounds the Section 404 permitting process,
as EPA has done, simultaneously raises the investment threshold for both public and private
project proponents. Moreover, Dr. Sunding’s report demonstrates that the negative effect on
investment would be strong, even if the risk of EPA exercising its purported authority under
5
Sunding’s work shows that the benefit cost calculation for a given project can be
represented mathematically as Benefit/Cost > 1 + hurdle rate. See id. at 7.
10. 10
Section 404(c) is relatively small. For example, if the project proponent foresees a mere 1%
chance that EPA would act against its previously issued permit, it would decrease the expected
cost-benefit ratio for the project by 17.5%. Sunding Report at 9. A 2% chance that EPA would
act adversely decreases the project’s cost-benefit ratio by an astounding 30%. Id.
Not surprisingly, project proponents have already begun to recognize the consequences of
an increased risk that EPA will either negotiate or require whatever modifications of the permit it
wants, whenever it wants them. For the reasons discussed above, this increased risk means a
significant decrease in the expected cost-benefit ratio of a proposed project. In some instances,
the decrease in the cost-benefit ratio will be sufficient for the project proponent to be dissuaded
from pursuing the project. See Sunding Report at 9. This chilling of investment would occur
across the entire range of activities that require a Section 404 permit—the total of which is
currently estimated at around $220 billion annually.
Greater uncertainty may also reduce investment in projects that need a Section 404
permit by making it more difficult to obtain financing. Banks could account for the type of risk
that EPA’s actions against a previously issued permit have created by charging higher interests
rates on money they lend to other projects requiring a Section 404 permit. See Sunding Report at
10. Bond rating agencies also consider regulatory risk when evaluating a proposed bond
issuance. See id. This makes borrowing capital more expensive for project proponents and, at
the margin, would cause some proponents to abandon their projects.
In other cases, banks may also deal with the increased uncertainty that EPA has generated
by “rationing” their credit. As Dr. Sunding explains, this sort of rationing can occur even when
the project proponent is willing to pay the higher interest rate that the risk of an adverse EPA
action would likely require. See Sunding Report at 10. If the threat of EPA action pushes the
11. 11
interest rate above the “bank-optimal” rate, banks could see it as a sign that the loan is not worth
the risk it entails. See id. at 10-11. For some project proponents, that could mean a complete
loss of access to the credit market, which might leave them with no realistic way to move their
projects forward.
The impact of the uncertainty created by EPA’s actions against the Mingo Logan Section
404 permit does not stop with increased interest rates and loss of access to credit markets.
Because projects requiring Section 404 permits regularly involve substantial irreversible
investment—i.e., capital expenditures that offer no return unless used in production—they are
often riskier than other types of investment. As a result, private firms and public agencies
commonly use higher hurdle rates when comparing benefit-cost ratios for such projects. Sunding
Report at 7. When the regulatory environment is uncertain, the hurdle rate will be set even
higher. Id. This uncertainty will delay or completely deter irreversible investments that would
otherwise be made. Id. at 8. This deterrent effect is even greater for larger projects, which
inherently require a larger capital outlay. Id. at 9.
2. By deterring investment in new projects, EPA’s actions will cause direct
and indirect harms throughout the economy.
Amici, as representatives of many project proponents from a variety of industries who
will bear these increased costs, would be directly and adversely affected. Moreover, because
such a wide variety of activities are permitted under Section 404, reducing investment in those
activities will have far-reaching negative effects on the economy as a whole. For those industries
that rely on Section 404 permits, a reduction in investment would translate directly into lost jobs
12. 12
and reduced economic activity. Projects that would otherwise have been built, and jobs that
would otherwise have been created, will never materialize.6
In addition, reduced investment in Section 404-dependent projects will have downstream
impact on the other parts of the economy. Many developments that require a Section 404 permit
are the types of projects that tend to spur other investment, or offer benefits to consumers and the
public. See Sunding Report at 3-6. These benefit-generating projects can include private sector
activities, such as projects that increase the supply of housing or commercial space, and public
sector activities such as libraries, schools and infrastructure projects that reduce costs throughout
the economy and contribute to overall quality of life.7
See id. These multiplying, downstream
benefits will be lost, however, if the initial investment in the Section 404-dependent project does
not occur.
Finally, it is important to note that the increased uncertainty and risk caused by EPA’s
actions in this case have an adverse impact on landowners whose property may include
jurisdictional wetlands or open waters. In a competitive land market, land prices will reflect the
returns that could be generated if the land were dedicated to its highest and best use. See
Sunding Report at 11. For undeveloped land, this price includes the amount that developers
would be willing to pay to acquire the land for a project. See id. Because EPA’s actions have, at
the very least, lowered the expected returns from a project that requires the developer to obtain a
6
For instance, studies have shown that each dollar spent on new housing construction
produces approximately three dollars in total economic activity; every $1 billion in residential
construction creates close to 10,000-11,000 jobs. See Sunding Report at 3, 5. The reverse is also
true—every dollar that is not invested in housing construction projects as a result of EPA’s
actions represents lost jobs and reduced economic activity.
7
The evidence shows, for example, that transportation infrastructure projects frequently
have large benefit-cost ratios, meaning that the total benefits to society greatly exceed the project
costs. See Sunding Report at 3.
13. 13
Section 404 permit, developers will not be willing to pay as much for the land they need. See id.
This will reduce the equilibrium market price of land, harming both landowners who might be
interested in selling their land, and long-term landholders such as farmers, whose land is their
primary asset. See id.
* * *
EPA’s effort to modify Mingo Logan’s Section 404 permit cannot be viewed as an
isolated action against a coal mine in West Virginia. If EPA is free to unilaterally modify Mingo
Logan’s permit, which was issued four years ago, there is nothing to stop it from also modifying
other previously issued permits. The specter of such unpredictable regulatory actions will
discourage project proponents from pursuing Section 404-dependent development, which will in
turn cause significant harm to the entire U.S. economy.
Dr. Sunding’s appended study explains in some detail the mechanics of measuring the
economic impacts that could result from EPA’s action against Mingo Logan. Those calculations
are important because amici expect the harms caused by EPA’s reinterpretation of its Section
404(c) authority to be severe. Equally important, however, is the breadth of those impacts. As
described above, EPA’s attempt to change the established Section 404 permitting process will
have ripple effects that spread out far beyond the coal mining industry in Appalachia. Amici
represent a diversity of industries bound together by their frequent reliance on Section 404
permits. Thousands of permit holders—public entities and private entities, farmers, builders and
manufacturers—have been relying on the Corps’ Section 404 regulations and predictable process
for decades. If EPA is allowed to change the game, to interfere in the operation of a
longstanding permitting system, it will send shockwaves across the country, adversely impacting
14. 14
amici and all the industry participants that they represent. Those impacts, amici submit, are a
vital consideration in this case.
CONCLUSION
For all the reasons stated in this brief, amici urge the Court to find in favor of Plaintiff
Mingo Logan Coal Company, and to hold that EPA does not have the authority to modify
previously issued Section 404 permits.
Dated: June 3, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
____/s/ Jay C. Johnson_______________
Kathryn Kusske Floyd (D.C. Bar No. 411027)
Jay C. Johnson (D.C. Bar No. 487768)
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 750
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: (202) 442-3540
Fax: (202) 442-3199
johnson.jay@dorsey.com
Counsel for Amici Curiae
Of Counsel:
Robin S. Conrad
Sheldon Gilbert
National Chamber Litigation Center, Inc.
1615 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20062
Telephone: (202) 463-5337
Counsel for Amicus Curiae Chamber of Commerce of the
United States of America
15. 15
Nick Goldstein
Vice President of Environmental & Regulatory Affairs
and Assistant General Counsel
American Road & Transportation Builders Association
1219 28th Street NW
Washington, DC 20007
Telephone: (202) 289-4434
Counsel for Amicus Curiae American Road & Transportation
Builders Association
Louis Warchot
Michael Rush
Association of American Railroads
Suite 1000
425 3rd Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20024
Telephone: (202) 639-2503
Counsel for Amicus Curiae Association of American Railroads