05 практики міської мобільності

•

0 likes•507 views

natavoloshyna

Тренінг з планування сталої міської мобільності. Львів 17-18 грудня 2015 р.

ІЛЮСТРАЦІЇ
МІСЬКОЇ МОБІЛЬНОСТІ –
ХОРОШІ ПРИКЛАДИ
ТА (НЕ) НАБУТИЙ ДОСВІД
ОНДРАШ ЕКЕЙШ
МОБІЛІССІМУС ЛТД
БУДАПЕШТ
ekes@mobilissimus.hu
+36 30 869 1674
ТРЕНІНГ З ПЛАНУВАННЯ СТАЛОЇ МІСЬКОЇ МОБІЛЬНОСТІ
(ПСММ), ЛЬВІВ, 17-18 ГРУДНЯ 2015

49
A város és a közlekedés megértése,
szeretete

Дякую за Вашу увагу!
Ондраш Екейш
Експерт з питань мобільності
Тел.: + 36 (30) 869 1674
e-mail:
ekes@mobilissimus.hu

This document discusses indicators for terrestrial invasive species and forest health in watershed condition assessments. It provides descriptions of "good", "fair", and "poor" ratings for the extent of invasive species populations and levels of insect/disease impacts and ozone damage in forests. Maps and data sources are presented as examples of how to evaluate these indicators, such as by showing areas at risk of tree mortality from insects/diseases or where ozone causes decreased tree growth. The document recommends collaboration and citizen science, such as through databases that track invasive species treatments or map their distributions, to share information on these forest and watershed health issues.

The document discusses Indicator 10 of the Watershed Condition Framework, which addresses the effects of rangeland vegetation on soil and water quality. Specifically, it examines the composition of native and desirable non-native plant species in rangeland areas compared to their natural levels based on site potential. A rating system of Functioning Properly, Functioning at Risk, and Impaired Function is provided based on the vegetation's contribution to soil, nutrient cycling, hydrology, plant production levels, and the presence of introduced plant species. The likelihood of watershed impacts increases as plant production decreases relative to the site's potential.

10 rangeland vegetation mo_ukr

natavoloshyna

8 fire regimewildfire_english_072418

natavoloshyna

This document provides guidance on assessing Indicator 8 (Fire Regime or Wildfire) of the Watershed Condition Framework. It can be assessed using either Attribute 8.1 (Fire Regime Condition Class) or 8.2 (Wildfire Effects). Attribute 8.1 evaluates departure from the natural fire regime based on vegetation, fuels, and fire characteristics. Attribute 8.2 evaluates effects of wildfire on soils and ground cover in terms of recovery time. The potential for watershed impacts increases with greater departure from the natural fire regime and as wildfire recovery times lengthen.

8 fire regime mo_ukr

natavoloshyna

8. wildfire rh ukr

natavoloshyna

8. wildfire

natavoloshyna

The document discusses wildfire detection and assessment using remote sensing tools and data. It presents a global wildfire detection tool from NASA that uses satellite data to identify fire occurrences. Maps of the Polyana watershed show the location of detected fires from 2001 to the present time based on this satellite data. The objectives are to detect wildfires using remote sensing tools and assess wildfire effects also using remote sensing data.

Water quality delehan

natavoloshyna

Aquatic biota savytskyi

natavoloshyna

4 aquatic biota_english_071418

natavoloshyna

This document discusses indicator 4 of the 12 indicator model for watershed condition - aquatic biota. It focuses on the distribution, structure, and density of native and introduced aquatic fauna. There are three attributes: 1) aquatic life form presence, 2) native species, and 3) exotic and/or invasive species. Condition is rated on a scale of 1 to 3, with 1 being properly functioning and 3 being impaired. The document provides examples of how the US Forest Service applied the indicator and attributes to evaluate watershed conditions in West Virginia. It also discusses considerations for field applications related to aquatic habitat and sampling strategies.

4 aquatic biota mo_ukr

natavoloshyna

3 aquatic habitat_english_071418

natavoloshyna

This document discusses indicator 3 of the Watershed Condition Framework, which is aquatic habitat. It addresses three attributes of aquatic habitat: 1) habitat fragmentation, which occurs when physical barriers isolate aquatic populations; 2) large woody debris (LWD), which performs important ecological functions in aquatic ecosystems; and 3) channel shape and function. The document provides examples and guidance on assessing each attribute, including considering road-stream crossings, barrier culverts, and LWD recruitment for attributes 1 and 2. It also provides a hypothetical example assessment for a US Forest Service area that rated attributes 1 and 2 as impaired based on fragmentation from crossings and historically low LWD due to past land management practices.

3 aquatic habitat mo_ukr

natavoloshyna

3.3 channel shape smj july26_english

natavoloshyna

The document discusses methods for assessing channel shape and function, including measuring channel dimensions, sediment balance, width to depth ratios, meander patterns, floodplains, headcuts, and alluvial fans. Specific metrics are described such as expected meander belt width and considerations for evaluating meander bends. Signs of channel instability and impairment are provided for incised channels, over-widened channels, and where roads intersect channels and floodplains. Alluvial fans are described as dynamic landforms where sediment is deposited.

2. water quantity rh ukr

natavoloshyna

2. water quantity

natavoloshyna

This document discusses water quantity as an indicator of watershed condition. It defines a natural hydrograph as the natural seasonal flows of a river without human influence, and an altered hydrograph as flows that have been changed by dams, diversions or groundwater withdrawals. These changes are measured using streamflow gauges and proxy features to assess the impact on magnitude, duration and timing of flows. The condition is rated as minor if flows are free flowing with limited impacts, moderate if dams mimic natural patterns and extreme flows are unaffected, and high if dams significantly alter seasonal flows and extreme events.

1. water quality sh j_ukr

natavoloshyna

1 final water quality smj july26_english

natavoloshyna

- Water quality can be impacted by nonpoint source pollution from many sources across a watershed and point source pollution from identifiable sources like pipes or factories. - The document discusses water quality criteria from state regulations and federal guidelines, water quality data from government agencies, and how water quality informs environmental management decisions. - Specific examples include state surface water quality standards, fish consumption advisories, and monitoring data on parameters like pH, aluminum, turbidity, and phosphorus from various water bodies.

3.3 channel shape sh j_ukr

natavoloshyna

River classification smj_july25_english

natavoloshyna

This document provides an overview of fluvial geomorphology and channel classification methods. It discusses the connection between watershed processes, land, and water. Several classification systems are described for classifying stream channels, including the Rosgen and Montgomery-Buffington systems. Level 1 classification involves rapidly identifying stream type, while Level 2 classification uses field measurements of cross-sections, slope, sinuosity and other characteristics to further classify channels. Indicators of bankfull width are also outlined. The classification systems can be used to understand natural channel processes and impacts of disturbance.

River classification ukr

natavoloshyna

More from natavoloshyna

10 rangeland vegetation_english_072318

natavoloshyna

10 rangeland vegetation mo_ukr

natavoloshyna

8 fire regimewildfire_english_072418

8 fire regime mo_ukr

8. wildfire rh ukr

8. wildfire

Water quality delehan

natavoloshyna

Aquatic biota savytskyi

natavoloshyna

4 aquatic biota_english_071418

natavoloshyna

4 aquatic biota mo_ukr

natavoloshyna

3 aquatic habitat_english_071418

natavoloshyna

3 aquatic habitat mo_ukr

natavoloshyna

3.3 channel shape smj july26_english

natavoloshyna

2. water quantity rh ukr

natavoloshyna

2. water quantity

natavoloshyna

1. water quality sh j_ukr

natavoloshyna

1 final water quality smj july26_english

natavoloshyna

3.3 channel shape sh j_ukr

natavoloshyna

River classification smj_july25_english

natavoloshyna

River classification ukr

natavoloshyna

More from natavoloshyna (20)

10 rangeland vegetation_english_072318

10 rangeland vegetation mo_ukr

8 fire regimewildfire_english_072418

8 fire regime mo_ukr

8. wildfire rh ukr

8. wildfire

Water quality delehan

Aquatic biota savytskyi

4 aquatic biota_english_071418

4 aquatic biota mo_ukr

3 aquatic habitat_english_071418

3 aquatic habitat mo_ukr

3.3 channel shape smj july26_english

2. water quantity rh ukr

2. water quantity

1. water quality sh j_ukr

1 final water quality smj july26_english

3.3 channel shape sh j_ukr

River classification smj_july25_english

River classification ukr

05 практики міської мобільності

1. ІЛЮСТРАЦІЇ МІСЬКОЇ МОБІЛЬНОСТІ – ХОРОШІ ПРИКЛАДИ ТА (НЕ) НАБУТИЙ ДОСВІД ОНДРАШ ЕКЕЙШ МОБІЛІССІМУС ЛТД БУДАПЕШТ ekes@mobilissimus.hu +36 30 869 1674 ТРЕНІНГ З ПЛАНУВАННЯ СТАЛОЇ МІСЬКОЇ МОБІЛЬНОСТІ (ПСММ), ЛЬВІВ, 17-18 ГРУДНЯ 2015

8. 8

12. 12 Folyó barátság Бордо

13. Ліон

14. Ліон