This document discusses patent families and how they are defined at the European Patent Office (EPO). It explains that the EPO supports two concepts of patent families: the simple patent family in DOCDB and the extended patent family in INPADOC. The simple patent family covers one invention, while the extended family covers a broader technology. It also describes what constitutes a priority and how priorities differ between the two concepts.
American Invents Act (AIA) Overview.
AIA Transitions.
Changes.
Post Issuance Proceedings.
What You Need For a Patent.
Comparisons.
First Inventor to File with Grace (FTFG).
Prosecution Under FTFG.
Patent: A presentation on "Patent Drafting" by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan - Ban...BananaIP Counsels
Patent: A presentation on "Patent Drafting" by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan - BananaIP
BananaIP Counsels, formerly Brain League IP Services, founded in 2004 at the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Bangalore’s incubation center (NSRCEL), is recognized as an IP/Patent trailblazer in India. The firm’s mission is to help clients maximize business value from their Intellectual Property (IP)/Patents, and gain competitive advantage in the market place. In its evolution from Brain League, BananaIP carries forward the firm’s core values – Merger of Technology,Management and Law, Swift Adaptation to changes in competitive environment, and business driven approach to Intellectual Property (IP)/Patent Services.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
Presentation on the Patent Process in US
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
American Invents Act (AIA) Overview.
AIA Transitions.
Changes.
Post Issuance Proceedings.
What You Need For a Patent.
Comparisons.
First Inventor to File with Grace (FTFG).
Prosecution Under FTFG.
Patent: A presentation on "Patent Drafting" by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan - Ban...BananaIP Counsels
Patent: A presentation on "Patent Drafting" by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan - BananaIP
BananaIP Counsels, formerly Brain League IP Services, founded in 2004 at the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Bangalore’s incubation center (NSRCEL), is recognized as an IP/Patent trailblazer in India. The firm’s mission is to help clients maximize business value from their Intellectual Property (IP)/Patents, and gain competitive advantage in the market place. In its evolution from Brain League, BananaIP carries forward the firm’s core values – Merger of Technology,Management and Law, Swift Adaptation to changes in competitive environment, and business driven approach to Intellectual Property (IP)/Patent Services.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
Presentation on the Patent Process in US
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
PatSeer is a fully-featured global patent database with powerful integrated analytics, project management, and collaboration capabilities. PatSeer includes 74 million full-text records and more than 115 million+ records across 104+ countries. It includes a rich search syntax with all the capabilities needed by professional patent searchers. With powerful filtering, multidimensional analysis, and collaboration capabilities PatSeer helps you get your patent projects done online with ease.
IPFlair provides the best patent consultant in India with the online patent filing process. So get patented today with IPFlair and boost up your business strategy.
Workshop for the Intellectual Property Department of the Sapalo Velez Bundang & Bulilan Law Offices, Marikina East Lake View Farm (MELF) Morong, Rizal (Philippines), 13 January 2012
Detailed information on different types of intellectual property rights and how to protect them through patent filing, copy rights, geographical identification and other procedures
PatSeer is a fully-featured global patent database with powerful integrated analytics, project management, and collaboration capabilities. PatSeer includes 74 million full-text records and more than 115 million+ records across 104+ countries. It includes a rich search syntax with all the capabilities needed by professional patent searchers. With powerful filtering, multidimensional analysis, and collaboration capabilities PatSeer helps you get your patent projects done online with ease.
IPFlair provides the best patent consultant in India with the online patent filing process. So get patented today with IPFlair and boost up your business strategy.
Workshop for the Intellectual Property Department of the Sapalo Velez Bundang & Bulilan Law Offices, Marikina East Lake View Farm (MELF) Morong, Rizal (Philippines), 13 January 2012
Detailed information on different types of intellectual property rights and how to protect them through patent filing, copy rights, geographical identification and other procedures
The Peculiar Searching Habits of the North American Patent Searcheratripper
This presentation was given in March 2011 at the International Symposium on IPR Information Dissemination, Taipei, Taiwan. I was asked to talk about some of the systems used by patent searchers in the United States.
Safe Nests in Global Nets - Innovation and IPAlberto Minin
This presentation and related paper contributes to research providing a new interpretation for the appropriability of critical industrial R&D, and in general to the literature on internationalization and maturation of R&D off shoring.
Critical R&D projects and technologies remain home-bound even in very large multinationals. Why? I was able to discuss the result of my quantitative empirical analysis directly with the managers involved in key decisions relating to the development of some of these technologies.
Their viewpoint suggests the presence of what I have defined “Safe R&D nests”. I will discuss that such “safeness” derives by a close coordination between scientific and technological research and management of intangible assets.
2. FULLTEXT FACSIMILE
EPO PATENT
INFORMATION
RESOURCE
DOCDB/XML
EPODOC EXTENDED WORLD WIDE EPO
FAMILIES LEGAL STATUS Patent
Information
Resource
EPO
Open REGISTER
Patent
Services
Commercial Global PATSTAT
Hosts Patent
Index
YO
U INPADOC
Worldwide
Legal Status
ESPACEne Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
10. PATENTS
PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY
P1 P2 P3
DOCUMENT DOCUMENT DOCUMENT DOCUMENT
D1 D2 D3 D4
EXTENDED FAMILY SIMPLE FAMILY
11. WHAT IS A "PATENT FAMILY" ?
A set of patents taken in various countries
to protect one single invention.
Where the "priority right" of the first filing is
extended to subsequent filings in other countries"
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
12. WHAT IS A "PRIORITY" ?
"Right of priority" is a time-limited right triggered
by the first filing of an application for a patent.
To make use of the right of priority the applicant
must "claim the priority" of the first application
when filing a subsequent application.
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
13. WHAT IS A "PATENT FAMILY" @
EPO
EPO is supporting two patent family concepts
DOCDB Simple Patent Family
INPADOC Extended Patent Family
DOCDB SIMPLE
versus
INPADOC EXTENDED
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
14. WHAT IS A "PRIORITY" @ EPO
Every possible link is a "priority" at the EPO
applications claimed under the Paris Convention
US provisional applications claimed for priority
previous applications claimed for :
continuation
continuation in part
division
references to an earlier PCT filing
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
15. DOCDB Simple versus INPADOC Extended
DOCDB Simple Patent Family
is covering one invention
technical content covered is identical
members have to have ALL priorities in common
with ALL other members
INPADOC Extended Family
is covering a technology
might be slight differences in technical content
members do not have to share more than ONE priority
with at least ONE other member, directly or indirectly
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
16. DOCDB Simple versus INPADOC Extended
DOCDB Simple Patent Family
most restrained definition of a patent family
particularly suited for prior art search
tailored to the needs of EPO examiners
INPADOC Extended Family
broadest definition of a patent family
supports identification technological trends
supports definition of geographical coverage
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
17. DOCDB Simple Patent Family
Most restrained definition of a patent family
Group of applications that cover ONE invention
Only want to take significant links into account
Only consider priorities that claim "first filing"
that claim first filing of new technical detail
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
18. ONLY THE SIGNIFICANT LINKS !!
Consider only those priorities that claim
an application that is "first filing"
an application that is equivalent to a "first filing"
an application that is standing in for a "first filing"
That means : only priorities that claim
under the Paris Convention [ INID 30 ]
a US continuation in part [ INID 63 ]
a US provisional application [ INID 30 ]
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
19. INPADOC Extended Patent Family
Broadest definition of a patent family
Group of applications that are related inventions
Do not want to miss ONE single link
Consider every possible link to be a "priority"
every application to application reference
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
20. EVERY LINK POSSIBLE !!
The usual suspects :
applications claimed under the Paris Convention
US provisional applications
But also ...
domestic applications claimed for a continuation,
for a continuation in part, for a division
reference to an earlier PCT filing [ INID 86 ]
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
21. BRAINS in GEAR !!
First Filing
Extended Patent Family
US Continuation in Part
Fenny Versloot-Spoelstra
22. The "First Filing" is the mother of the invention
It discloses
new technical content
for the first time
Exercise [1] : US2008311819
26. Q.5
NO priority on the first page
ONE priority in the bibliography
This is an artificial priority ...
... generated in anticipation of
subsequent filings in other countries
that claim the first filing
for right of priority
27. Q.6
... in order to
group applications
that cover one single invention
in one simple patent family
only consider significant links ...
28. artificial priority in anticipation
of subsequent filings in other
DK countries
that claim the first filing
20050000192 for right of priority
WO DK CA CN EP JP
2007065494 200500192 KR NO US
PCT route first filing national phase
not "significant"
within scope of
simple family EXTENDED FAMILY = SIMPLE FAMILY
30. Q.7
first publication formally
disclosing new technical detail
claiming TWO applications
for right of priority
so not THE first filing
these are THE first filings
announced in the gazette never
formally published
31. Q.8
Q.9
GB 20060025102 GB 20070006766 GB 20070006769
GB 2444804 GB 2444803 GB 2456682
Division of
[ claims divided out ]
SPORTS
SPORTS GARMENT SWIM CAP
GARMENT
AU AT AU
BR BR
CN CN
EP DK EP
JP KR ES JP
US EXTENDED FAMILY KR US
is a collection of
SIMPLE FAMILIES
32. GB 2444804
GB 2444803 A
NO new technical detail
"swim cap" already present in original filing
new technical detail only the claims have been "divided out"
GB 2456682
33. A "Continuation in Part" is like a first filing
It adds new technical detail
on top of an existing invention
Only in the U.S. of A !!
Exercise [3] : US20070011914
34. Q.10
references to
domestic applications
first filing
35. Q.11
artificial priority
in anticipation of
future domestic filings
referring to this application
every reference to
a domestic application
is a priority link
36. the first filing
is a
continuation in part of
is a
continuation in part of
is a
continuation in part of
38. US 11/182970 A US 11/195219 US 11/328593
in g s
L ac ge
d v itie
nd Ri s Ca
d r ed
r ou ise mbe s
pa Ra Me c es
ra Re
W
US 11/448967
r
e cto
o t
l Pr
ca
mi
a to
An
And let's start with YOU, let's start with putting YOU in the picture [ click ] You will most probably access our data through one of our on-line services - free of charge. Through OPS - Open Patent Services - or through ESPACEnet - that is driven by OPS. [ click ] OPS has access to EPODOC - the search and reference database that is there to support our examiners in their search and examination effort. [ click ] EPODOC has access to our full-text and facsimile database, to the repository of extended patent families, to worldwide legal status, to the EPO register, but most importantly [ C ] EPODOC is being fed by the EPO Patent Information Resource. That is a pretty impressive package that you have at your disposition, I would say OPS and ESPACEnet are our public services - free of charge. At the other end of the scale we have our subscription products, INPADOC worldwide legal status and the EPO patent information resource - also known as "DOCDB/XML" [ click ] Main customers there are the commercial hosts. They buy the data, add value for the benefit of their specific audiences and make the information available to their users - which might well be YOU. [ click ] Spin-off products of the DOCDB/XML raw data product are GPI - Global Patent Index - and PATSTAT - our database for patent statistics ... to which YOU might well be a subscriber. Now ... when YOU are the centre of our universe where the dissemination of patent information is concerned.
... the patent publication is the throbbing heart in our patent information system. Patent bibliographic data, abstracts and cited references [ click ] Classifications as printed on the first page of the document IPC/8, domestic classifications, US patent classifications CPC-NO - CPC as allocated by the national offices FI and Fterm as allocated by the JPO ... [ click ] Over 100 patent issuing authorities are providing us with data. [ click ] Business processes are there to connect the data to the patent publication [click] A dedicated family building process will group the publications into SIMPLE patent families [ click ] Every week we run through the COMPLETE collection to build and re-build EXTENDED patent families. As soon as we have a patent family, examiners at the EPO and the USPTO can start allocating CPC - cooperative patent classification - in a joint classification effort. [ click ] As soon as we have a patent family, we will do our best to make sure that there is an English language abstract in almost every family. If there is no publication in a family in the English language, we will order out for one. [ click ] Everything inside the box is the EPO Patent Information Resource. [ click ] Outside of the box we find our master database for legal status, full-text and facsimile documents, loosely connected to the patent publication or application.
Imagine ... you are sitting at your desk, staring at a million and one patent documents ... and someone is waiting for you to find ALL the patents related to recreational shoes like the ones marketed by Timberland.
Now ... wouldn't that be much easier if the patent documents were nicely organised? If the patent documents were nicely grouped into "families" of inventions? Into "patent families"?
Patent families will help you reduce your workload, you will only have to look at one document in a family to understand the invention overcome language barriers, there will always be one document in a family in a language that you can understand They will help you find related inventions define geographical coverage identify technological trends. .
Let's start with a concept that we all know, let's start with families of people. [ click ] Families of people are related through bloodlines [ click ] Families of inventions are related through priorities
Let's start with a concept that we all know, let's start with families of people. [ click ] Families of people are related through bloodlines [ click ] Families of inventions are related through priorities
[ click ] This is an extended family of patents. All of the documents in the picture are family members, even the two documents at the far ends of the family tree. They are indirectly related, they have priority 2 in common indirectly . [ click ] This is a simple family of patents. The two documents in the middle of the picture are directly related, they share exactly the same set of priorities.
Patents can be grouped into families. So ... what is a patent family? In the most general sense of the word, a patent family is ... .
Patents in a family are related through priority links. So ... what is a priority? In the most general sense of the word, a priority or "right of priority" is ...
What is a "patent family" at the EPO? At the EPO we are supporting two concepts : The DOCDB simple patent family and the INPADOC extended patent family. [ click ] Let's compare those two concepts that we support at the EPO. Let's put DOCDB simple against INPADOC extended and see which one wins If there are winners and losers at all ...
What is a priority at the EPO? Every possible link between patent applications is a "priority" at the EPO : ...
[ click ] The DOCDB Simple Patent Family is covering one single invention, which means that the technical content covered by each member in the family is exactly the same. To be a member of a simple patent family, you have to have ALL priorities in common with ALL of the other members. [ click ] The INPADOC Extended family is covering a technology, which means there might be slight differences in technical content from one member to the other. Its members do not have to share more than one priority with at least one other member, directly or indirectly. Members at the far ends of the family tree do not necessarily have to have a priority in common. Like what we have seen with our families of people. The grand-dads left and right did not have one single blood-line in common. The kids in the middle had all of their blood-lines in common.
There is a patent family concept for anybody's taste or purpose. [ click ] The DOCDB Simple Patent Family is the most restrained definition of a patent family. It is sometimes also referred to as the "restricted" family. It is particularly suited for prior art search, it is tailored to the needs of EPO examiners but will serve anyone with an interest in searching. [ click ] The INPADOC Extended family is the broadest definition of a patent family, it supports identification technological trends, it supports definition of geographical coverage. Winners all around, I would say, no losers at all. Both concepts serve patent professionals equally well, depending on what they are looking for.
... is the most restrained definition of a patent family. In a DOCDB Simple Patent Family you will find a group of applications that represent one single invention. A "list of equivalents" if you like. The "also published as" in the ESPACEnet bibliography. [ click ] Here we only want to take the significant priority links into account. In this concept we will only consider priorities that claim "first filing".
Only the significant links!! [ click ] Significant links are those priorities that claim an application that is a "first filing" that is equivalent to a "first filing" that is standing in for a "first filing" [ click ] That means that we will be considering only those priorities that claim an application under the Paris Convention - the "first filing" an application that is a US continuation in part - equivalent to a "first filing" an application that is a US provisional - standing in for the "first filing" I have listed the INID codes under which you can find them on the first page. You might want to make a quick note of the INID codes, if you are not already familiar with them. You will need them in your exercises.
And then we have the INPADOC Extended Patent Family This is the broadest definition of a patent family. It is a group of applications that cover inventions that are related, either directly or indirectly. [ click ] To connect all of those related inventions to one another, it is vital that we do not miss out on one single link. We will have to consider every possible link to be a "priority"
Every link possible ... what are they ... There are the usual suspects : applications claimed for priority under the Paris Convention US provisional applications claimed for priority [ click ] But also : references to domestic applications reference to an earlier PCT filing
And then it is time to get our brains in gear. I have got some exercises organised around the first filing an extended patent family with its roots in Europe a US example : the continuation in part Not only to explain the concepts, but also to show you how we are translating information that you find on the first page of the original document into bibliographic data in ESPACEnet
Q.1 : Every possible link to another application is a "priority" at the EPO. There is more than one link to another application for this publication. Which links can you identify ? Q.2 : In a simple patent family we are only looking at the significant links. Which one is the significant link in this case ? Why do you think that is?
Q.3 : Go to the bibliographic data for this US publication. You will find the other members in this DOCDB simple patent family under "also published as". Knowing that this US publication claims a DK application for right of priority, which publication do you think represents the first filing ?
Q.4 : Have a look at the original document of the first filing. How many links to other applications do you see?
Q.5 : Go to the bibliographic data of the first filing and check out the links. Compare the priority links that you find in the bibliographic data to what you have seen on the first page of the original document. What do you notice?
Q.6 : Members of a simple patent family claim identical priorities. These publications do NOT claim an equal number of priorities. They DO cover identical technical content. They DO belong in one simple patent family What do you think we have done to make sure these application will be members of the same simple patent family? Think in significant links.
Let's re-cap! It starts with the first filing in Denmark, disclosing the toy building block. The applicant has taken the PCT route to further protect his invention. The PCT filing has entered the national phase in Canada, China, Japan, Korea, Norway and the US. The PCT filing has entered the regional phase in Europe. All of these entries into the national or regional phase refer to the PCT filing. The Danish first filing does not claim any applications for priority. An artificial priority has been generated in anticipation of subsequent filings in other countries that may claim this first filing for priority. The reference to an earlier PCT filing claimed by the national/regional phases is not considered a significant link.
Let's have a look at this EXTENDED patent family A revolution in swim wear by SPEEDO, that never really made the mark ...
Q.7 : This is the first document formally disclosing new technical detail. In the previous exercise we have seen that "first filings" do not claim any applications for priority in the INID (30) section. What is the first thing you notice, when looking for priority claims?
Q.8 : Let's browse through the extended patent family. The fact that the applicant is UK based all across this family tells you this invention was first filed in GB. Knowing that this is a British invention what would you think is the "hard core" of this family? Click on "compact" to get a better overview. Q.9 : Select GB 2444803 Browse through the abstract and have a look at the drawing. Have a look at its family members under "also published as". There is another GB-A that is a member of this simple patent family. Click on it, browse through the abstract and have a look at the drawing Characteristic of a simple patent family is that it covers identical technical detail. What is the first thing you notice?
Q.10 : Every possible link to another application is a "priority" at the EPO. There are no INID [30] priorities claimed under the Paris Convention There are no INID [86] priorities referring to an earlier PCT Where would you look to find priority links? Can you hazard a guess at where you can find the "first filing"?
Q.11: Go to the bibliographic data of this US continuation in part Compare what you have seen on the original document to what you see in the bibliographic data. Do you notice anything? Can you try and explain what you see? Think of what we have seen when looking at the first filing in the first exercise.
Let's see that artificial priority in action ...
Q.12 : Go to the extended family. Click on "compact" for a better overview. Click on US 2007011910, 11, 12 and 14 in sequence. Compare the priorities claimed by each of the US members. You can see the number of priorities claimed grow from one member to the next. Is there anything else that strikes you? Focus on the first filing.