hoose (1) one childhood experience from the list provided below. This list has been generated from the Australian Institute of health and Welfare (2020) Australia’s Children report. Asthma in children aged 5-14 Type 1 diabetes in children aged 0-14 Brain cancer in children up to 14 years Anxiety disorders in children aged 5-14 Dental decay in children over 12 Overweight/Obesity in children 5-14 School aged child living with an intellectual disability Children experiencing homelessness Low birthweight babies Children who are exposed to or a victim of family violence After researching the prevalence of your chosen childhood experience, develop a brief hypothetical case study (200 words or so) about a child and their family highlighting the health care setting in which you (the nurse) meet the family; the case study helps to guide your essay and provide context for your reader. To explore the impact of your chosen childhood experience on the child and their family in the case study you have developed, read widely and address the following prompts informed by contemporary and relevant developmental, nursing and family care theory: Outline the prevalence in Australia of the childhood experience chosen and highlight the short term, medium term and potential long term health outcomes/impact on the child  Discuss the impact (protective or otherwise) of family, culture and environment on the identified health outcomes for children identified from prompt 1 Explore the impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and development of the child in the case study, in light of their age/stage of development  When you (the nurse) meet the family (as outlined in your case study) how might you engage therapeutically with the child and family? Outline age/development appropriate communication strategies that you could adopt to support child/family flourishing  Based on the chosen childhood experience selected and the case study specifics, provide two priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales, that would advocate for positive child/family health outcomes  This essay will be developed with an introduction, body and conclusion, with correct grammar and spelling and acknowledging sources using APA 7th Edition referencing style. Word count of 2000 words +/-10% will be maintained; inclusive of intext references, excluding reference list. Rubric Assessment 3: Case study and literature review Assessment 3: Case study and literature reviewCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcome1.Case study developed is clear, informative and feasible 5 PtsExceeds expectationsVery well considered case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and comprehensively presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse interaction is clearly defined.4 PtsMeets ExpectationsWell considered case study. The child/family circumstances are realistic and thoroughly present.

1. hoose
(1) one
childhood experience from the list provided below. This list
has been generated from the Australian Institute of health and
Welfare (2020) Australia’s Children report.
Asthma in children aged 5-14
Type 1 diabetes in children aged 0-14
Brain cancer in children up to 14 years
Anxiety disorders in children aged 5-14
Dental decay in children over 12
Overweight/Obesity in children 5-14
School aged child living with an intellectual disability
Children experiencing homelessness
Low birthweight babies
Children who are exposed to or a victim of family violence
After researching the prevalence of your chosen childhood
experience, develop a brief hypothetical case study (200 words
or so) about a child and their family highlighting the health care
setting in which you (the nurse) meet the family;
the case study helps to guide your essay and provide context for
your reader.

2. To explore the impact of your chosen childhood experience on
the child and their family in the case study you have developed,
read widely and address the following prompts informed by
contemporary and relevant
developmental, nursing and family care theory:
Outline the prevalence in Australia of the childhood experience
chosen and highlight the short term, medium term and potential
long term health outcomes/impact on the child
Discuss the impact (protective or otherwise) of family, culture
and environment on the identified health outcomes for children
identified from prompt 1
Explore the impact of the chosen childhood experience on the
learning and development of the child in the case study, in light
of their age/stage of development
When you (the nurse) meet the family (as outlined in your case
study) how might you engage therapeutically with the child and
family? Outline age/development appropriate communication
strategies that you could adopt to support child/family
flourishing
Based on the chosen childhood experience selected and the case
study specifics, provide two priority nursing
actions/interventions with rationales, that would advocate for
positive child/family health outcomes
This essay will be developed with an introduction, body and
conclusion, with correct grammar and spelling and
acknowledging sources using APA 7th Edition referencing style.
Word count of 2000 words +/-10% will be maintained; inclusive
of intext references, excluding reference list.

3. Rubric
Assessment 3: Case study and literature review
Assessment 3: Case study and literature
reviewCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a learning
outcome1.Case study developed is clear, informative and
feasible
5
PtsExceeds expectationsVery well considered case study. The
child/family circumstances are realistic and comprehensively
presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the
context of the family and nurse interaction is clearly defined.4
PtsMeets ExpectationsWell considered case study. The
child/family circumstances are realistic and thoroughly
presented in light of the chosen childhood experience; the
context of the family and nurse interaction is clearly defined.3
PtsMeets ExpectationsGood case study. The child/family
circumstances are realistic and clearly presented in light of the
chosen childhood experience; the context of the family and
nurse interaction lacks some clarity.2.5
PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory case study. The child/family
circumstances are realistic and presented in light of the chosen
childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse
interaction lacks some detail or depth.0
PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory case study. The child/family
circumstances are not clearly presented in light of the chosen
childhood experience; the context of the family and nurse
interaction lacks clarity/detail making it difficult for the reader
to conceptualise the situation.
5 pts

4. This criterion is linked to a learning outcome2.Outline the
prevalence in Australia of the childhood experience chosen and
highlight the short term, medium term and potential long term
health outcomes/impact on the child
10
PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this
criterion, demonstrating accuracy and comprehensive
consideration of health outcomes/impact on the child related to
the chosen childhood experience.8
PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating accuracy and thorough consideration of health
outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood
experience.7
PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating accuracy and fair consideration of health
outcomes/impact on the child related to the chosen childhood
experience; may lack depth detail in some aspects.5
PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating accuracy, health outcomes/impact on the child
related to the chosen childhood experience may be limited;
further depth in response/consideration would have increased
marks.0
PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory achievement against this
criterion, demonstrating inaccuracy and inadequacy regarding
prevalence data and/or health outcomes/impact on the child
related to the chosen childhood experience; further depth in
response/consideration would have increased marks.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome3.Discuss the

5. impact (protective or otherwise) of family, culture and
environment on the identified health outcomes for children
identified from criteria 2
10
PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this
criterion, demonstrating sophisticated insight into the impact of
family, culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the
case study child identified in criteria 2.8
PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating well considered insight into the impact of family,
culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case
study child identified in criteria 2.7
PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating some insight into the impact of family, culture,
and environment on the health outcomes for the case study child
identified in criteria 2.5
PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating sufficient understanding of the impact of family,
culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case
study child identified in criteria 2; lacking in detail or depth to
achieve a higher mark.0
PtsNo MarksUnsatisfactory achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating a lack of understanding of the impact of family,
culture, and environment on the health outcomes for the case
study child; discussion may be general rather than specific to
the situation presented in the case study.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome4. Explore the
impact of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and
development of the child in the case study, in light of their

6. age/stage of development
10
PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this
criterion, demonstrating sophisticated examination of the
possible impact of the chosen childhood experience on the
learning and development of the child in the case study.8
PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating a thorough examination of the possible impact of
the chosen childhood experience on the learning and
development of the child in the case study.7
PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating well considered possible impact of the chosen
childhood experience on the learning and development of the
child in the case study.5
PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion,
demonstrating a sufficient understanding of the possible impact
of the chosen childhood experience on the learning and
development of the child in the case study; lacking in detail or
depth to achieve a higher mark.0
PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory achievement against this
criterion, demonstrating a lack of understanding of the chosen
childhood experience on the learning and development of the
child in the case study; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a
higher mark; discussion may be general rather than specific to
the situation presented in the case study.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome5. When you (the
nurse) meet the family (as outlined in your case study) how
might you engage therapeutically with the child and family?
Outline age/development appropriate communication strategies

7. that you could adopt to support child/family flourishing
10
PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this
criterion, outlining therapeutic engagement strategies that are
cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case
study. Strategies presented are supportive of child/family
flourishing.8
PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion,
outlining therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant
of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study.
Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing.7
PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion,
outlining therapeutic engagement strategies that are cognizant
of the family/child situation as outlined in the case study.
Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing.5
PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion,
outlining some therapeutic engagement strategies that are
cognizant of the family/child situation as outlined in the case
study; lacking in detail or depth to achieve a higher mark.
Strategies presented are supportive of child/family flourishing;
but may be somewhat generic.0
PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory achievement against this
criteria, therapeutic engagement strategies may be absent or
inconsistent with/inappropriate for the family/child situation as
outlined in the case study; discussion may be general rather
than specific to the situation presented in the case study.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome6. Based on the
chosen childhood experience selected and the case study
specifics, provide two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions

8. (separate to the therapeutic engagement strategies) with
rationales, that would advocate for positive child/family health
outcomes
5
PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this
criterion. Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions are
clearly articulated and thoroughly justified. The actions
suggested are positive in intent and are specific to the needs of
the child/family in the case.4
PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion.
Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales
are clearly articulated. The actions suggested are positive in
intent and are specific to the needs of child/family in the
case.3.5
PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion.
Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales
suggested. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are
relevant to the needs of the child/family but may not address the
most pressing priorities as objectively presented in the case.2.5
PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion.
Two (2) priority nursing actions/interventions with rationales
suggested. The actions suggested are positive in intent and are
relevant to the needs of the child/family but are more generic
rather than specific to the situation.0
PtsUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory achievement against this
criterion. Nursing actions are absent or demonstrate a lack of
understanding regarding prioritization of care needs in relation
to the presented case; discussion may be general rather than
specific to the situation presented in the case study.
5 pts

9. This criterion is linked to a learning outcome7. Use of evidence.
Criteria 2-6 above are informed by at least 12 sources of high
quality contemporary, relevant and credible developmental,
nursing and family care theory and literature that is integrated
into discussion to support key points
5
PtsExceeds expectationsExemplary achievement against this
criterion, a very well informed paper utilizing high quality
evidence4
PtsMeets ExpectationsHigh achievement against this criterion, a
very well informed paper3
PtsMeets ExpectationsGood achievement against this criterion;
a well informed paper that would benefit from further reading
an research in some areas or some different choices of
evidence2.5
PtsSatisfactorySatisfactory achievement against this criterion; a
paper that is accurate in its content but lacks depth in some
areas or relies on evidence that is variable in quality. Further
reading and research would have improved achievement against
this criterion0
PtsUnsatisfactoryThis paper does not draw on sufficient
reliable, contemporary of relevant theory or literature to present
an informed position. Further reading, research and effort to
integrate evidence into discussion would have improved
achievement against this criterion
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome8.Scholarly
approach; written expression, development of essay and
acknowledgement of sources, adherence to word count
2000words +/- 10% (inclusive of intext citations, excludes

10. reference list). Submission is formatted using Times New
Roman, 12 font and double spaced with 2.54cm 'normal'
margins.
5
PtsExceeds expectationsExcellent essay structure that is logical,
clear, and sophisticated in its development. Professional
terminology is used throughout. No errors with grammar,
syntax, punctuation, and spelling. APA 7th referencing style is
used, no referring errors in text or reference list. Adheres to the
Word limit +/- 10% and submission formatting.4
PtsMeets ExpectationsVery good essay structure. Occasional
errors with grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling. Minor
editing and revision required. APA 7th referencing style is used,
minor errors in intext citations and/or reference list. Adheres to
the Word limit +/- 10% and submission formatting.3
PtsMeets ExpectationsGood essay structure. Some errors with
grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling, limited editing and
revision required. APA 7th referencing style is used, some
errors in intext citations and/or reference list. Adheres to the
Word limit +/- 10%, and submission formatting is mostly
correct.2.5
PtsSatisfactoryAdequate essay structure. Consistent errors with
grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling which detract from
the clarity of the work, however key points are still adequately
communicated to the reader. Significant editing and revision
required to improve the academic quality of the work. APA 7th
referencing style is used inconsistently, with errors. Adheres to
the Word limit +/- 10% and submission formatting is mostly
correct.0
PtsUnsatisfactoryPoor essay structure, errors in grammar,
syntax, punctuation, and spelling detract significantly from the

11. clarity of the writing so that ideas and understanding of
concepts cannot be communicated clearly to the reader.
Thorough editing and revision is required to achieve
satisfactorily in this criteria. Incorrect application of APA 7th
edition referencing style resulting in inadequate
acknowledgement of sources and risk of breaching academic
integrity/plagiarism. Word count not adhered to, formatting of
work impedes clarity of message and document presentation.
5 pts
Total points: 60