2. The DTC has a role to ensure that all
medicines prescribed and dispensed to
patients are safe and of good quality.
This involves:
monitoring and addressing
medication errors
monitoring and ensuring drug
quality
monitoring and managing ADRs
3. Medication error is a failure in the
treatment process that leads to, or has
the potential to lead to, harm to the
patient
Medication error is any preventable
event where a dose of medication that
is received by a patient differs from
what the prescriber has prescribed, or
from hospital policy and procedures
(AHSP 1999).
4. During Treatment Process
Diagnosis
Prescription written
Prescription received and processed
Drug dispensed
Drug administered
Patient receives drug
Patient response
5. Prescribing the wrong drug
Writing illegibly
Confusing the name of one drug
Prescribing the wrong dose
Calculating or Writing wrong dose
Wrong route of administration
Prescribing the wrong formulation (slow
release drugs)
Prescribing the duration of treatment
incorrectly
6. Prescribing wrongly for a given individual
Error in identity
Failing to account pre-existing
disease
Failing to account concurrent
therapy
Prescribing with inadequate or incorrect
instructions
Prescribing without informed consent of the
patient
7. medicine given to the wrong patient
Confusing Names
wrong dose or strength given
medicine given for the wrong duration
medicine given to a patient with a known
allergy.
prescribed medication not given
Confusing in Abbreviation, e.g.
QD vs QID
IU vs IV
8. AZT (Azithromycin) Vs AGT (Tinidazole)
Alspan (Hyoscine Butylbromide) Vs Alpan (Loratidine)
Metriz (Metronidazole) Vs Metrix (Glucosamide)
Metlong (Metforming) Vs Metlog (Metoprolol)
Itop (Itopride HCl) Vs Metop (Metoprolol)
Aceclo (Aceclofen) Vs Seclo (Omeprazole)
T-zine (Cetrizine HCl) Vs Tizan (Tizanidine)
9. Errors in drawing up and giving medicines
Wrong drug
Correct drug, wrong dose
Correct drug, wrong dilution
Correct drug, wrong formulation
Entraining air, particles or other contaminants with the
drug
Errors in administration
giving a drug outside or against currently accepted
practice
Wrong route, wrong site, wrong rate, wrong patient
Wrong drug by mistake
IV drug incompatibility
10. Establishing a consensus group of physicians,
nurses and pharmacists to select best practices
Introducing a punishment-free system to collect
and record information about medication errors
Developing written procedures with guidelines
and checklists for the administration of IV fluids
and high-risk drugs such as insulin, heparin
and narcotics
Developing standardized times to administer
medicines and a policy to do so only when
patients are on the wards
Requiring that a patient’s identity be confirmed
before administering a drug
Allowing verbal or telephone orders only in an
emergency
11. Requiring legible handwriting and complete
spelling of a drug name
Requiring the use of standardized notation
Dose units written in one way only, for example
‘mcg’ not ‘µg’ or ‘g’ not ‘gm’
Use of leading zeros for values less than 1 (0.2
instead of.2) and avoidance of trailing zeros for
values more than 1 (2 instead of 2.0)
Requiring that the route of administration and
the complete directions (for example ‘daily’ not
‘OD’) be written on all drug orders
(prescriptions)
Requiring that prescribers write generic and
brand names for medicines with ‘look-alike’ or
‘sound-alike’ names.
12. Dispensing and rechecking prescription
In cases of suspected suicidal intent by
a patient, to counsel and report to
authorities is recommended.
Automatic stop orders for critical drugs
that are not renewed by the physician in
the therapeutic order sheets like
mannitol, potassium and antibiotics are
sometimes made part of a hospital
policy.
The pharmacists, through collaboration
with the hospital or district therapeutics
committee, issue a drug watch list for
all hospital staff to be aware of.
13. An appreciably harmful or unpleasant
reaction, resulting from an intervention
related to the use of a medicinal product
A serious adverse reaction is any medical
occurrence that at any dose normally used in
humans:
results in death
requires inpatient hospitalization or
prolongation of existing hospitalization
results in persistent or significant
disability or incapacity
is life-threatening.
14. Type A reactions
These are an exaggerated but otherwise normal
pharmacological response to the effects of the
medicine given in therapeutic dose.
These reactions cause significant morbidity but are
rarely severe. Examples include:
pharmacodynamic, for example bronchospasm
with beta-blocker administration
toxic, for example absolute or relative overdosing
of aminoglycosides causing deafness
withdrawal syndrome or rebound effect, for
example spontaneous rise in blood pressure with
clonidine discontinuation
15. Type B reactions
These are bizarre and unpredictable with
no relation to dose and are often allergic
in nature.
They are often severe and cause high
mortality. Examples include:
idiosyncratic reactions, for example
irreversible aplastic anaemia caused by
chloramphenicol
anaphylactic reactions, for example
anaphylactic shock with penicillin
drug-induced diseases, for example
antibiotic-associated colitis.
16. The main ADR monitoring system is
Pharmacovigilance Program
Any ADR monitoring system should include, as
a minimum:
reporting of an ADR to the DTC on standard
forms
investigation and analysis of reports by a
selected DTC member
discussion and evaluation of reports by the
DTC on a regular schedule (quarterly) and
report to medical staff
reporting to manufacturers and national
regulatory authorities of all events thought to
be ADRs (and not known side-effects).
17. WHO Definition:
“The science and activities relating to
the detection, assessment,
understanding and prevention of
adverse effects or any other drug
related problem”
18. In 2002: National Drug Regulatory Authority of Nepal
(DDA) took initiatives to set up a pharmacovigilance
program in Nepal.
In October 2004: Government of Nepal designated
DDA as National Center to liaison with the UMC,
Sweden, the WHO Collaborating Centre for
International Drug Monitoring.
In July 2006: Nepal became a WHO UMC Programme
full member country.
The revised National Drug Policy 2009 (Draft)
recognizes the need for a pharmacovigilance program
in Nepal.
The DDA acts as a focal point for ADR monitoring and
regional centers operate under it.
Establishing system of regular reporting of the
Adverse Drug Reaction and keeping it operational.
19. Manipal Teaching Hospital,
Pokhara
Tribhuwan University Teaching
Hospital (TUTH), Kathmandu
Nepal Medical College, Kathmandu
KIST Medical College, Lalitpur
BP Koirala Institute of Health
Sciences, Dharan (BPKIHS)