Sovereignty for Police Officers Course, Form #12.022

1
Sovereignty For
Police Officers
Form #12.022
29MAR2013 Sovereignty For Police Officers, Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM) http://sedm.org

3
by:
Sovereignty Education and
Defense Ministry (SEDM)
http://sedm.org
March 29, 2013

5
If you want a copy of this presentation after viewing
the course, you can download it from:
–Liberty University, Section 2.15
http://sedm.org/LibertyU/LibertyU.htm
–SEDM Forms Page, Form #12.022
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
Course Materials

6
• Information appearing in this presentation is educational in nature
• Everything presented is based on:
– Thousands of hours of scriptural and legal research
– Review and use of the resulting research by the over 1 Million people who have visited
and are currently using the SEDM Website and Family Guardian Website
– Continuous feedback from our many readers that have improved the quality of the
information over time
• If you find anything inaccurate in this presentation, our Member Agreement, Form #01.001
makes it a DUTY of all members to promptly bring the error to our immediate attention with
supporting evidence so that we may continually improve our materials. Your evidence must
be completely consistent with our presentation below:
Reasonable Belief About Income Tax Liability, Form #05.007
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ReasonableBelief.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
• The application of this information to your specific legal circumstances is exclusively your
choice and responsibility
• The information presented is copyrighted and subject to the copyright restrictions found at:
http://sedm.org/disclaimer.htm
• Our disclaimer is the SAME disclaimer as the U.S. government uses. See section Internal
Revenue Manual, Section 4.10.7.2.8 at:
http://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/ch10s11.html
DISCLAIMER

7
DISCLAIMER
• THIS NON-COMMERCIAL VIDEO IS
PROTECTED BY THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE OF
THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C.
• PLEASE CONSULT OUR D.M.C.A. PAGE IF
YOU HAVE COPYRIGHT ISSUES:
http://sedm.org/Ministry/DMCA-Copyright.htm

8
1.Introduction
2.Police Aren’t Required to Protect You
3.Sovereignty core beliefs
4.People in public service SHARE our goals
5.What Sovereignty is NOT
6.Misconceptions about Sovereignty Advocates
7.Current objections to public service
employees
COURSE OUTLINE

9
8. Application: Vehicle Code
9. Abuse of the police powers
10.Questions to Ponder on . . .
11.Hidden scams behind the vehicle code
12.Sovereignty and gun control
13.Sovereignty and taxation
14.Sympathy for people killed in the line of duty
15.Summary and Conclusions
COURSE OUTLINE

10
• Thank you for your oath to uphold the
American moral and ethical values.
Thank you

11
Introduction
• This video was prepared to:
–Provide an overview of Sovereignty.
–Dispel government propaganda designed to
discredit and misrepresent the issue of
Sovereignty.
–Raise the awareness to the people in public
service about their own Sovereign status.
–Educate the people about their proper roles
when public service is exercised.
–Provide a defense useful in traffic court.

12
• The Declaration of Independence is the First Organic Law to
which all subsequent laws must heed. It establishes
CONSENT of the governed as the foundation of ALL JUST
government civil authority.
• Public service requires the taking of an oath to uphold the
Organic Laws so established, whereby all people hold equal
status, with no superior, before stepping down to performing
services for others, such as public service.
• Under said First Law, no group of people can lawfully get
together and strip anyone of that sovereign equality without
his/her consent.
• The Bill of Rights establishes the moral and ethical conditions
under which people may lawfully be stripped of their
sovereignty and equality as ONLY under common law crimes.
Introduction

13
• The First Amendment is FIRST in the Bill of Rights
because:
– It recognizes and protects the ABSOLUTE right of all to associate and
DIS-associate.
– The FIRST thing you do when forming any group, including a
“government” is to give those who are NOT a member of said group the
ABSOLUTE RIGHT to NOT join or participate.
– Those CONSENSUALLY associated are called STATUTORY “citizens”
and “residents”.
– Those NOT CONSENSUALLY associated are called NONRESIDENTS
and TRANSIENT FOREIGNERS.
– If the right to contract means anything at all, it means the right to
CONTRACT any and every government OUT of the relationship between
the parties, and disassociate with any civil statutory status over which
the government enjoys jurisdiction.
Introduction

14
• The First Ten Amendments (The Bill of Rights)
protect all sovereigns from socio-political abuse and
unlawful loss of life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness (property) unless sovereigns EXPRESSLY,
knowingly, and willfully consent to become unequal
via a fully disclosed agreement, or are found guilty of
a common law crime, by a jury of their peers.
• The Bill of Rights can only be interpreted in harmony
with the intent of the writers at a time when ONLY
common law existed. Since there were no statutes at
that time, then the only crimes at common law would
be murder, rape, arson, theft, mayhem, treason, etc.
Introduction

15
• To refuse to associate and thereby remain a nonresident is not
“lawless” nor does it mean one is an anarchist because those
“nonresidents” who don’t associate are still subject to:
– The CRIMINAL law. . . and
– The COMMON law.
• If it is “anarchistic”, then the government itself is an anarchist
because it unconstitutionally abuses sovereign immunity to:
– Pick and choose what laws it wants to be subject to.
– What laws it is NOT subject to.
– When it is a “person” under the civil law.
Anyone, including governments, who can do the above is truly
“lawless” and an anarchist.
• If government claims sovereign immunity, then WE as co-equals
must ALSO have it, because it was delegated from We the People.
Introduction

16
• The so-called purpose of establishing government is
to PROTECT and SERVE the public and NOT the
“individual”:
“..fundamental principle of American law is that a government and its agents
are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police
protection, to any individual citizen"
[Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d .1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981]
• The basis for paying “taxes” is to fund the
institutionalized process of providing protection for
club members, such as “citizens” and “residents”.
• Those who are members of the club are parties to the
“social compact”, which is a contract or agreement.
Police Aren’t Required to Protect You

17
• The above case establishes that:
– The PARTY is the individual within the social compact and NOT the
“collective” or group.
– Police have NO RECIPROCAL DUTY under the protection contract to
THAT PARTY, and therefore, do NOT render the main consideration
under the contract to the individual.
– This converts the CONTRACT into a COMPACT, because it is a ONE-
sided “benefit”. This is because the police have no duty to the
individual citizen, and yet the individual citizen is perceived as a party
to the social compact. This creates a contradiction.
• It is a principle of contract law that all contracts:
– Are UNENFORCEABLE without MUTUAL consideration and MUTUAL
obligation.
– If only one party “benefits”, then a theft is occurring against the other
party, unless the party consented.
Police Aren’t Required to Protect You

18
• Therefore, if police don’t have a legally enforceable obligation
or duty to a SPECIFIC citizen to protect them, then:
– Where does the MUTUAL obligation arise for the individual citizen to pay for
services NOT rendered directly to them in the form of “taxes”?
– Do we REALLY have a “government” as legally defined, if they don’t have to
protect you PERSONALLY in exchange for the taxes you pay INDIVIDUALLY?
• This can only mean that:
– Police officers only operate upon the PUBLIC domain.
– Police officers have a duty to protect ONLY PUBLIC property and PUBLIC
persons, not PRIVATE property or PRIVATE persons.
– You have to CONVERT (donate) your PRIVATE property to PUBLIC property to
even qualify for their services!
• Would you hire a security guard to protect YOUR PRIVATE property under
the above circumstances? We wouldn’t!
Police Over-reach

19
Sovereignty Core Beliefs
• The essence of sovereignty is that EVERYONE has equal
rights, equal dignity, and deserves equal respect and
treatment under the law, whether a sovereign or a public
servant, regardless of race, creed, nationality, etc..
• The U.S. Supreme Court agreed, when it held:
“No duty rests more imperatively upon the courts than the enforcement of those
constitutional provisions intended to secure that equality of rights which is the
foundation of free government.“
[Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Ellis, 165 U.S. 150 (1897) ]
• The “free government” in the above U.S. Supreme Court
citation reveals that “equality of rights” is the guarantee of
“free association” by consent to duty. The Court reinforced
that the Declaration of Independence established that all JUST
powers derive from the consent of the governed.

20
• Consent to alternative choices and voluntary
free association does not mean “compelled”.
– People freely associate by instituting governments, which
are bound to serve ONLY those within said association.
– The free market is the only moral, ethical, and viable force
which can self-regulate toward sustainable economic and
socio-political interactions in the Land of The Free.
– Public sector associations obey the same rules governing
free association. Capitalism works in the private sector, just
as well in the public sector!
– Any compelled association is therefore a violation of equal
protection and equal treatment.

21
• No association of several people is allowed to
violate rights of one of the people, and either
are equal in authority and rights under the
foundational or substantive laws. This is
because:
–In the Land of The Free any one of the people has
only the power to self-govern. Said power is the
only power that can be delegated at different
degrees of association with others.
–In our society of equals, with no superior, no one
can delegate that which he/she does not have.

22
–If one knowingly, willingly, and freely joins
associations by consenting to a statutory civil
status, one acquires only the contractual
obligations attached to the particular association.
A “foreigner” may get a “driver’s license” without
the automatic presumption of STATUTORY
“citizen” status.
–Any other approach leads to idolatry toward
government and turns government into an
unconstitutional civil religion, in which
OBEDIENCE is the worship, FRANCHISES are the
bible, and the God being worshipped is civil rulers.

23
• Like every other type of “business”, government delivers a
“product” called “protection” and no one can be forced to
become a customer for that product.
– “Customers” are called statutory “citizens” and “residents”.
– “Non-customers” are called “nonresidents” and “transient foreigners” and may
not assume the status of “person” or “individual” under the civil statutory law.
• It is a CRIME and UNCONSTITUTIONAL SLAVERY to compel
people to become a “customer” and therefore to become a
statutory “citizen” or “resident”.
• The U.S. Supreme Court agrees:
In imposing a tax, says Mr. Chief Justice Marshall, the legislature acts upon its
constituents. "All subjects," he adds, "over which the power of a State extends
are objects of taxation, but those over which it does not extend are, upon the
soundest principles, exempt from taxation. This proposition *334 may almost be
pronounced self-evident." McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 428.
[United States v. Erie R. Co., 106 U.S. 327 (1882)]

24
• Sovereignty means:
–Dignity, respect, and absolute EQUALITY of
rights and EQUALITY of treatment.
–Only being treated UNEQUALLY when
EXPRESS informed consent is demonstrated
with evidence.
• Even as a police officer, you cannot escape
the sovereign responsibility of self
government.
In Short

25
• There are ONLY two types of governments:
– Those that civilly govern by CONSENT. See:
Requirement for Consent, Form #05.003
http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Consent.pdf
– Terrorist government. See:
De Facto Government Scam, Form #05.043
http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/DeFactoGov.pdf
• Any attempt to do any of the following is terrorism as legally
defined:
– Impose or enforce any civil status upon a non-consenting party.
– Enforce the civil statutory laws against non-residents.
– Collect income taxes from non-resident parties.
– Place conditions upon the acquisition of any government product or service
that would compel one to assume a specific civil status, such as statutory
“citizen” or “resident”. Simply paying directly and immediately for the service
ought to be sufficient to receive it. This is “privilege induced slavery”.
Two Types of Governments

People in Public Service Share Our Goals

27
• Upon taking the oath of public service, sovereigns
may exercise specific delegated police powers ONLY
for the purpose of protecting the PRIVATE property
of those freely associated. Said task is done through:
–Legal education.
–Law enforcement.
–Political activism.
–Administrative activism.
–Legal activism.
• As police officers, sovereigns must learn the law and
its relationship to criminal statutes, just as our
members must also do on a regular basis.

28
• The only difference between any of the
following is consent:
–Theft and a donation.
–A statutory “citizen” and a nonresident.
–A “taxpayer” and a “nontaxpayer”.
–Rape and consensual sex.
• As public servants, sovereigns preserve their own
interest in preventing crime by strictly observing the
requirement for consent in all enforcement actions.

29
• A sovereign’s job under oath is JUSTICE.
• JUSTICE requires recognizing all sovereign rights
such as:
– To be left alone, unless accused of a common law crime
according to the restrictions promulgated in the Bill of
Rights.
– To be left alone unless one knowingly, willfully, voluntarily,
freely, and under full disclosure, consents to civil statutory
status such as “driver”, “citizen”, “resident”, etc..
Otherwise, any compelled association would fall under
unconstitutional eminent domain and identity theft, where
the public rights attached to “civil status” are the property
STOLEN.

What Sovereignty is NOT

31
What Sovereignty is NOT
• True “sovereigns” are NOT:
– Sovereign citizens (an oxymoron. See Form #08.011, Sections 9.1, 9.2).
– Elitists (denies First Organic Law of All men are created equal)
– Super constitutionalists (Constitutions are rules for governments)
– Terrorists (See Black’s Law definition).
– Violent (sovereignty never advocates the initiation of force)
– Occupy Movement (sovereigns do not “occupy” themselves)
– Racists (equality of ALL, not just the white race)
. . .or any other stereotype that might connect them to violent, anti-
government, or criminal people or activities.
• Sovereignty in our country is protected by each and
every one of us. Slander, labeling or defamation is a
tool used by those who oppose the rule of law and
oppose the equality and dignity of all.

32
Misconceptions About Sovereignty Advocates
• Sovereigns are NOT elitists, because they promote the
EQUALITY of rights under the law, dignity, and respect for
ALL, regardless of race, sexual orientation, or nationality, in
keeping with all foundational laws of our American Society.
• Sovereigns are NOT anti-government. Since there would be no
government unless instituted amongst CONSENTING
sovereigns, there is no benefit to any “violent overthrow” of
free association.
• Sovereigns are against monopolies on anything, and provide
for the enforcement of civil laws against ONLY “club”
members. Non-members have to be civilly LEFT ALONE.
• Sovereigns do not deem criminal laws as “voluntary”.

33
• Sovereigns are not “anarchists”. They are civilly
governed as co-equals by the common law but not
statute law. A voluntary civil franchise such as the
vehicle code requires consent. Lack of consent is:
– NOT deemed as “anarchistic”.
– Rather called “freedom of choice” and “freedom of
association”.
– Called an exercise of your unalienable right to NOT contract
or civilly associate with the government for CIVIL
“protection”.
– For details, see:
Problems With Atheistic Anarchism, Form #08.020
Misconceptions About Sovereignty Advocates

34
Current objections to public service employees
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service deceive the
public to avoid procuring consent, by arbitrarily decreeing
“codes” such as franchises as “law” for everyone, or
PRESUME a “code” is LAW or PUBLIC LAW, when in fact it is
a voluntary franchise, requiring consent.
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service exercise LOVE
OF MONEY to force people into a commercial/tax obligation
without their consent to BECOME “taxpayers” or “customers”
of a specific service.
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service fail to give
reasonable notice of the requirement for consent when they
make a legal presentment.

35
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service fail to protect
people’s right to be LEFT ALONE. Hence equal protection is
transgressed AGAINST. “Justice” is legally defined as the
“right to be left alone”. (See
http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/justice.htm)
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service enforce an
UNEQUAL relationship , and thus violate the Constitution.
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service steal by
PRESUMING a legal interest of government in ALL property.
“Property” is defined as EXCLUSIVE use of a thing and the
RIGHT TO EXCLUDE ALL OTHERS from using, controlling, or
“benefitting from” the use of a thing. (see Ministry
Introduction, Form #12.014;
http://sedm.org/Ministry/MinistryIntro.pdf )

36
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service
claim sovereign immunity but refuse to
recognize the equal right of others to it. Thus,
they interfere with EVERY attempt to approach
them as an EQUAL, not as a SERVANT.
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service
steal by PRESUMING others are party to a
contract, such as an “employee” or “public
officer” without demonstrating consent to the
status. This includes the Internal Revenue
Code and the vehicle code.

37
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service try to
insert themselves as a party into every commercial
transaction, against the wishes of the parties to said
transaction, by PRESUMING that the parties operate
under a civil statutory status such as “driver”- which
in fact the parties do not have or do not consent to
having. This:
– Reflects an attempt to defraud under color of law.
– Is a direct interference with the protected right to contract,
for which governments are instituted among men.
– Is no different than a “stick up” of a common street
criminal.

38
• Some sovereigns under oath to public service PRESUME
consent to additional services although one signed-up for
only one specific service. Forms such as driver licenses are
presumed to ALSO usually falsely:
– Identify a domicile on federal territory.
– Identify the applicant as an agent of a particular association
or organization. This includes statutory entities such as
“citizen”, “resident”, “driver”, “spouse”, “taxpayer”, etc.
None of the above should be PRESUMED, and they should
ask whether people want these things and not force them
onto the people through deception.

39
• One cannot take a Constitutional oath to support and
defend the equality and rights of all and yet:
– Refuse to recognize the right to disassociate from the “club” as a
statutory “person” or “citizen” and to instead be a status of statutory
non-citizen national.
– Refuse to recognize and protect the right to NOT participate in a
specific civil franchise.
– Refuse to recognize and protect the right of sovereigns NOT to procure
a specific government service.
– Refuse to recognize and protect the right to NOT procure any specific
civil statutory status, including “driver”, “citizen”, “resident”, etc.
– Refuse to recognize and protect the right to exclude the government
from taxing or benefitting from the use of one’s property. “Property”,
after all, is legally defined as the right to exclude.
– Refuse to recognize and protect the right to NOT use government
identifying numbers in connection with any transaction.
Orwellian Doublethink

40
• Forced “protection” by any association or organization is a
racket paid for through “PROTECTION MONEY”.
• Likewise, forced “taxation” by any government instituted
among men is “PROTECTION MONEY”.
• The only lawful governmental PROTECTION is of the People’s
right to contract or NOT to contract for protection.
• The foundational and substantive laws of the Land of The Free
disallow compelled associations such as “doing business”, or
being a “club member” called a “citizen”/”resident” of a lawful
government association.
• No foundational or substantive laws allow the use of Mafia-like
techniques, such as threats, force, lies, deception, etc.,
against those who object or fail to “volunteer” to pay a tribute
which is effectively “Protection Money” (i.e. “district” taxes).
Mafia v. Government?

41
For a complete video on the Government Mafia, see:
http://famguardian1.org/Mirror/SEDM/Media/MafiaGovt.mp4
Mafia v. Government?

Application: Vehicle Code

43
CRIMINAL PROVISIONSCIVIL/FRANCHISE PROVISIONS
Speeding
Driving
without
license
Drunk
driving
Running
red light
Illegal
parking
“Civil Infractions” “Crimes”
Driving
without
seatbelt
Man-
slaughter

# Description Civil/Franchise
Provisions
Criminal Provisions
1 Violations called “Infractions” Crimes
2 Type of violation Malum prohibitum Malum in se
3 Type of law PRIVATE law
Civil franchise
PUBLIC law
4 Requires consent to
enforce?
YES NO
5 Applicable to: Those who consent to the civil
statutory status of “driver”
All
6 Commercial activity? Yes No
7 Origin of authority Regulation/taxation of use of
public roadways for hire
Public protection
8 Violations heard in “Traffic court” Criminal court
9 Type of court hearing case Franchise court Constitutional court

# Description Civil/Franchise
Provisions
Criminal Provisions
11 Requires an injured party? No Yes
12 Acquires the “force of law”
without consent
No Yes
13 Requires domicile to
violate?
Yes No
14 Jury trial? No (violates constitution if no
consent given)
Yes

46
• License plates and driver licenses are government property.
• When a police officer stops people, the first thing they ask for is evidence
that such property is being “used” in connection with the commercial use
of the roadways.
• Only when the license/registration (government property) is
CONSENSUALLY so used can it lawfully convey rights to any government.
• Likewise, our time, vehicle, and property are PRIVATE when not so used,
and thus we have the EQUAL right to demand that:
– Government representatives procure our consent to take or use it for THEIR benefit.
– Government representatives must sign up for OUR license to use said property when it is
PRIVATE.
– The use of said property WITHOUT said license FROM US is EQUALLY a violation of our
anti-franchise agreement and a tort.
• A “public officer” is legally defined as someone in charge of public
property. Likewise, a police officer using our time, towing our vehicles, or
demanding penalties in connection with otherwise PRIVATE property
becomes OUR servant instead of the government’s. It goes BOTH ways.
How Vehicle Code Violates Equality

47
• Police officers can be “off duty” when they take off their
uniform BUT…
• If we go “off duty” by removing the license plate and not using
the driver license because we are NOT using the commercial
roadways for hire, we are:
– Stopped by police for driving without a license plate.
– Suspected of being criminals.
– Prosecuted for driving without license and/or registration.
– Harassed for not having a commercial relationship with the
government.
• In other words, the government abuses the vehicle code
franchise as a means to compel us to work for them 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week, WITHOUT COMPENSATION and we are
punished while “OFF DUTY”.
How Vehicle Code Violates Equality

48
• Policemen are supposed to enforce ONLY the
criminal laws.
• The vehicle code contains BOTH civil franchise
provisions as WELL as criminal provisions.
• Civil franchise provisions of the vehicle code:
– Are called “infractions” or “civil infractions”.
– Are intended primarily to raise revenue.
– May only be enforced against those who CONSENT to
acquire the civil/franchise status of “driver” AND who
ALREADY work for the government as public officers
domiciled on federal territory not within any state.
Abuse of the Police Powers

49
• It is an abuse of the police powers to:
– Use policemen as revenue collectors.
– Incentivize policemen with commissions on each ticket
given.
– Put a policeman on the stand for a civil infraction matter
who has a direct or indirect financial interest in the
outcome. This is a breach of public trust and conflict of
interest.
– Arrest people who are not ALREADY public officers for
refusing to get a “driver” license.
– Give policemen access to any more guns/weaponry than
the citizens themselves may obtain. This violates equal
protection and equal treatment that is the foundation of the
Constitution.
Abuse of the Police Powers

50
• No trust White man who love green paper.
• No trust chief in black robe and hammer [judge]. He kidnap
many.
• No trust man in black clothes with gun and red light on
moving wagon [police]. He tax collector for White chief in
black robe and hammer.
• No trust White man in black robe with wooden hammer. He lie
much.
• No trust White man who change laws all the time.
• No trust White man who pretend “codes”
[compacts/consensual franchises] are law for everyone.
• No trust White man that no keep his promise.
The World According to Chief White Hawk

51
• No trust White man that no respect the Great
Creator Spirit.
• No trust White man that do not pray to Great
Spirit.
• No trust White man who kill unborn babies
with spear.
• No trust White chief who do not read the good
Book.
• No trust White man who forsake babies and
leave squaw alone.

53
• When we want to terminate a driver license, the DMV
will say THEY are the only ones who can do it and
when THEY terminate it, they will call it a
“suspension” and then make us a criminal if they
catch you driving without a license from SOME
government.
• DMV will misrepresent the civil or penal provisions
“code” as law for those who never applied for a
license.
• DMV violate the Fifth Amendment right NOT to
incriminate oneself by taking biometric data in
connection with the license application.
How the DMV/Vehicle Code SCAMS People

54
• When we apply for a license, they compel us to be a public
officer in the national government by compelling the providing
of a Social Security Number. This allows them to:
– Place any burden or tax on you they want.
– Kidnap our legal identity and move it to federal territory not protected by the
Constitution. See 42 U.S.C. §1301 definitions.
– Alienate an Unalienable right in violation of the Declaration of Independence.
– Trade “rights” for “privileges” even though you don’t consent. This violates
the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine of the U.S. Supreme Court.
– Convert PRIVATE rights to PUBLIC rights without the consent of the owner.
– Institute a THEFT and taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
– Work a purpose OPPOSITE of that for which governments are established,
which is to protect PRIVATE rights. The first step in that process is to keep
PRIVATE rights from being converted to PUBLIC rights without the consent of
the owner. Therefore, the DMV is NOT a government agency, but an ANTI-
GOVERNMENT agency that does the OPPOSITE of what governments are
established to do.

55
• It’s a SCAM to mix CIVIL and CRIMINAL law together
in one title of code called the “vehicle code”, and
refuse to give the public “REASONABLE NOTICE”
within each section whether that section is CIVIL or
CRIMINAL.
– It can’t be BOTH.
– Doing so delegates undue discretion to traffic court personnel.
– Doing so violates the due process of law because it fails to give
“reasonable notice” to the public of what is expected of them.
– Doing so causes the public to falsely believe that the section can be
enforced against them WITHOUT their consent.

56
"It has long been established that a State may not
impose a penalty upon those who exercise a right
guaranteed by the Constitution." Frost & Frost
Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of California, 271 U.S.
583. "Constitutional rights would be of little value if
they could be indirectly denied,' Smith v. Allwright, 321
U.S. 649, 644, or manipulated out of existence,'
Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339, 345.“
[Harman v. Forssenius, 380 U.S. 528 at 540, 85 S.Ct.
1177, 1185 (1965)]

57
WHAT IF. . .
– The civil provisions of the “code” are a voluntary
franchise?
– The “code” is not “law” for EVERYONE because it is a
voluntary civil franchise?
– “Traffic court” is a binding arbitration board for people
already INSIDE the government as “public officers”?
– “Traffic infractions” do not apply to those who do not
consent to acquire the civil status of “driver”?
– It is a crime of THEFT and SLAVERY to FORCE someone to
assume the duties and liabilities associated with the civil
status of “driver”?
Questions to Ponder On. . .

58
WHAT IF…
– The “citizen/government” relationship has been
replaced with the “employee/employer” relationship?
This is called a “de facto government”.
– Imputing or enforcing any civil status against a non-
consenting party is an unconstitutional taking without
compensation (violates Fifth Amendment)?
– Attempts to enforce the “driving without a license”
civil provisions of vehicle code are simply a method to
recruit people to volunteer to become uncompensated
officers of the government without consent, and to do
so at the point of a policeman’s gun?

59
WHAT IF . . .
– “Taxes” are really just “protection money” to procure the
right to simply be “left alone” (justice) by a group of thugs?
– Police are being brain washed by their employer to enforce
a civil religion based on INEQUALITY between the
Government and the People?
– Everything in this presentation is TRUE?
– Police raised the information in the presentation with their
boss and requested a written, signed response? Do they
think they would be terminated, and if so, are they really
SERVING AND PROTECTING their own interests as ONE of
the People when not in uniform? Those obeying or
enforcing the law should have NOTHING to hide and be
“beyond reproach”, right?

60
WHAT IF. . .
–Some uniformed thugs are the ones “sticking up”
and robbing people at the point of the gun by
forcing them to become statutory “driver”
franchisees?
–A white collar boss is the one that orders the
violations documented here?
–Towing or confiscating the unregistered PRIVATE
vehicle of an unlicensed PRIVATE party not
“driving” is a criminal theft?

61
WHAT IF. . .
–Traffic court for those who did not consent to
become “drivers” constitutes an unconstitutional
“bill of attainder”?
–“Traffic court” is a PRIVATE business not within
the government? That is how Black’s Law
Dictionary describes “franchise courts”.
–Police supervisors are hiding these critical facts
from their underlings?
–Judges are hiding these critical facts from police?

62
WHAT IF. . .
–Legislators are hiding these critical facts
from policemen?
–The TRUTH on these matters are in STATE
statutes that we are very deliberately NOT
allowed to read and are difficult to find?
–The professors at police criminal justice
program are hiding these critical facts from
us?

63
WHAT IF . . .
• Police are chronically and frequently violating
their Constitutional oath by NOT knowing these
things or taking them seriously? Do policemen
EVEN care, or is it ONLY about the money, their
pay, and their “benefits”?
• It is a violation of the state Constitution to hear
a case in a franchise court called “traffic court”
against a party who never consented to acquire
a license and who demands a jury trial?

64
• If indeed the civil provisions of the vehicle code apply to
EVERYONE, then why would one have to “apply” (consent) for a
“license”.
• Who polices the police? Aren’t they supposed to police EACH
OTHER?
• How can government impose “duties” on nonconsenting parties
without instituting involuntary servitude in violation of the 13th
Amendment?
• Do police blindly follow orders like the Nazis and illegally injure
people and violate their oath with impunity by simply doing what
they are told?
• Do policemen even have the ability to FINALLY THINK for themself .
. . or did PUBLIC/GOVERNMENT school destroy that?

65
God gave us all a GOOD and
incredibly complex brain.
Are we finally going to USE it, or just
keep drinking Nazi Kool-Aide?
Why didn’t they teach all this in the
criminal justice curricula police
undergo?

66
• [Judge Napolitano on why we should not trust the government.
See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZHX44thcLk]
Judge Napolitano

67
• The fact that the people charged with
learning and enforcing our laws DON’T
ask these questions or try to answer
them AT A PERSONAL LEVEL:
–Causes the Sovereign People they serve to distrust
their government.
–Undermines the credibility of the government.
–Is a common source of fear, terror, and terrorism
among the public.
–Undermines your job of protecting the public
health, safety, and morals.
Terrorism

68
• WHO is the real “terrorist”?
[Original (pre-Orwellian) Definition of the Word "Terrorism"
Funk and Wagnalls New Practical Standard Dictionary (1946)]
Terrorism

69
• [Do we work for the government, or does the government work for us?
See: http://youtu.be/edNmwmKRLeA]
Judge Napolitano

70
• Sovereigns wrote the Second Amendment. Therefore there is
no reason to object to gun control, so long as:
– The SAME rules apply to police officers.
– No police officer may have any more weaponry than a law abiding
American can have.
– No member of the military operating within the states may have or
acquire any more weaponry than a law abiding American can have.
• The above position is based on the Constitutional requirement
for equal protection and equal treatment.
• Any deviation from the above, turns “government” into a civil
religion with supernatural or superior powers that then
becomes the object of “worship”/obedience compelled at gun
point.
Sovereignty and gun control

71
• At the founding of our republic, SLAVES were the
only ones who couldn’t own guns. Do police want
EVERYONE to be a slave?
• Resources documenting our position on gun control:
– Gun Control Topic, Family Guardian website
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/GunControl/GunControl.htm
– Gun Control and Militia Playlist
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLin1scINPTOusX8K51ftxzWvTSLX7Wza-
Sovereignty and gun control

72
• We are not against paying taxes.
• We don’t object to paying for police, jails, courts, and the
military. We think that EVERYONE should have to pay for
these things and pay the SAME AMOUNT, since all are
protected equally.
• We ONLY object to the following methods of taxation:
– Ability of government to charge people UNEQUALLY for the same service, such
as through graduated taxation.
– No constitutional limits on the percentage of one’s earnings paid for either
federal or state services.
– Ability of government to administratively seize property without a court trial to
pay for taxes. They ought to have to take us to court to collect, just like we
have to do when we want to collect from anyone else. This is a requirement of
equal protection and equal treatment.
– Charging or taxing for services that people DO NOT WANT or DO NOT NEED
beyond the basic services above.
Sovereignty and Taxation

73
• The sovereignty movement is growing fast mainly
because of widespread government corruption.
• The sovereignty movement is a DEFENSIVE reaction
to:
– The widespread refusal by corrupted public servants to prosecute
THEIR OWN CRIMES.
– The fact that citizens are forbidden by the courts to prosecute these
crimes themselves and the de facto criminals are the ones who refuse
to prosecute the crimes.
– The fact that a corrupted government not only doesn’t protect PRIVATE
property or PRIVATE rights, but ONLY protects its own THEFT of
PRIVATE rights from the public. Thus, we have an ANTI-government
rather than a “government”, because they do the OPPOSITE to what
governments were CREATED to do.
Widespread Government Corruption is the REAL
Reason for the Growth of the Sovereignty Movement

74
– The fact that public servants refuse to “leave us alone” and terrorize us to
subsidize activities and a so-called “government” that we want NO part of and
are not a “member of”. That’s state sponsored terrorism, not “government”.
– The fact that those in government fraudulently pretend they are a “government”
but refuse to actually ACT like a government. See:
De Facto Government Scam, Form #05.043;
http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/DeFactoGov.pdf.
• Evidence of this widespread corruption is documented at:
Government Corruption, Form #11.401
http://sedm.org/GovCorruption/GovCorruption.htm
• The quickest way to undermine the growth of the
sovereignty movement is to:
– Prosecute the corruption within the government documented in the
above.
– Directly address the issues raised UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY in
the court record if it is in fact wrong, as required by 26 U.S.C. §6065.

75
• Presumptuously (and in violation of due process of law) calling the above
evidence either “bogus” or “frivolous” without directly rebutting the above
evidence with EQUALLY persuasive evidence only expands the
sovereignty movement because:
– Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(b)(6), a failure to deny constitutes an
admission of the facts of evidence no expressly denied.
– It is a crime of witness tampering to “selectively enforce” against those who expose
government corruption in order to silence whistleblowers.
• Calling our research “frivolous” or “bogus” or attempting to civilly
penalize us without offering evidence PROVING that assertion from our
domicile as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b) is:
– A violation of the separation of powers doctrine in which courts are unconstitutionally
acting in a political capacity within the Executive Branch.
– Perpetuates and protects an unconstitutional state-sponsored religion in which
government criminals have a de facto unconstitutional “title of nobility” or indemnity
from prosecution for their crimes.

76
• If you as a public servant want to know why the sovereignty movement exists and
continues to expand, LOOK IN THE MIRROR!

77
• We feel the pain of those police who have been shot
or whose colleagues have been killed by violent
extremists.
• We read/watch the same police training information
and videos as you in regards to “sovereign citizens”.
See:
– 10 tips and tactics for investigating Sovereign Citizens
http://www.policeone.com/investigations/articles/6176998-10-tips-and-tactics-for-investigating-Sovereign-Citizens/
– Sovereign Citizens and Law Enforcement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=d_y-gLm9Hrw
Sympathy for people killed in the line of duty

78
• The fact of the matter is that:
– People like Jerry Kane who allegedly killed police officers
never, to our knowledge, claimed to be a “sovereign
citizen”. We have a copy of HIS ENTIRE research hard disk
and none of it claims he was a “sovereign citizen”.
– Connecting Jerry Kane with the status of “sovereign
citizen” may be a way to focus underserved attention on
people such as us who DO NOT support violence against
police officers, are not anti-government, and who don’t
advocate or condone breaking any law.
– The reason is that we represent a threat by our ability to
prove the government corruption that makes some of what
you do a criminal offense. CORRUPT governments ONLY
protect themselves, and enslave rather than protect others.

79
• Anyone who shoots policemen is a criminal and
ought to go to jail, no matter what they call
themselves, including “sovereign citizen”.
• The same thing applies to policemen who stick up
people at the point of a gun for refusing to contract
with the government to become a statutory
“taxpayer” or “resident” called a “driver”. It’s still a
“stick-up”.

80
Summary and Conclusions
• Government workers such as police have been
drinking government Kool-Aide their whole career.
• Most of what police do is lawful insofar as it pertains
to enforcing the CRIMINAL laws. We thank God for
the things that police do that ARE lawful.
• The unlawful part is documented in this presentation
and deals primarily with the civil/franchise aspects of
the vehicle code, and the misrepresentation of that
portion of the “CODE” as PUBLIC LAW or law for
EVERYONE.
• Police for the most part didn’t CREATE the
lawlessness documented here, but they are
instruments of it if they don’t question authority.

81
Summary and Conclusions
• Isn’t it time that we all start:
– Reading the law for ourself?
– Questioning authority?
– Not allowing “public policy” or a “code” that is not law for
EVERYONE and not PUBLIC LAW to be enforced against
those who are NOT subject or who do not consent to BE
subject? These are the REAL people you are supposed to
be defending, RIGHT: the poor, needy, and uninformed.
– Defending the PEOPLE from a corrupted government that
police work for?
– Taking the police oath seriously to support and defend the
Constitution?

82
Further Information
• The following resources on our website go into much
greater detail on the subject of this presentation.
– Policy Document: Rebutted False Arguments About Sovereignty, Form
#08.018
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/RebFalseArgSovereignty.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
– Policy Document: Answers to Press Questions About Sovereignty
Advocacy, Form #08.019
– Citizenship and Sovereignty Course, Form #12.001-background on
sovereignty and citizenship, but NOT “sovereign citizenship”

83
– Foundations of Freedom, Form #12.021-introduces equality and
sovereignty as the foundation of freedom
» Video 1: Introduction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikf7CcT2I8I
» Video 2: Freedom, Sovereignty, and Justice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ofiwvb_sJJI
– Sovereignty Forms and Instructions, Form #10.005 –detailed forms and
instructions to restore the sovereignty EVERYONE was born with
– Government Franchises Course, Form #12.012 – background on
franchises. Most of the vehicle code is a civil franchise.
– Non-Resident Non-Person Position, Form #05.020 – summary of legal
obligations of the government in its treatment of “nonresidents”, who
are people NOT associated with or consenting under the “social
compact”.
Further Information

84
– Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private Persons, Form
#05.037 – why it is unconstitutional and criminal to compel any civil status
against non-consenting parties. This is where the right NOT to be a statutory
“citizen” or “resident” is established, even among those born in a country.
– Secrets Police Don’t Want You to Know- Eddie Craig, former police
officer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3nok7Cby28&
– Policy Document: Rebutted False Arguments Against This Website, Form
#08.011 – additional rebutted false arguments against some but not all alleged
beliefs of so-called “sovereign citizens”.
http://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/RebFalseArgAgWebsite.pdf
– It’s an Illusion –John Harris. Proves that the present de facto government is an
illusion.
https://youtu.be/spf4d6pG7ek
Further Information

85
• For an entertaining video on how we tell our
members to deal with the police, see:
Dealing with the Police, Chris Rock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8
Further Information

Sovereignty for Police Officers Course, Form #12.022

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to Sovereignty for Police Officers Course, Form #12.022

Similar to Sovereignty for Police Officers Course, Form #12.022 (20)

More from Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM)

More from Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM) (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Sovereignty for Police Officers Course, Form #12.022