Fournier’s Gangrene: 
A Urologic Emergency 
You Don’t Want to Miss! 
Angela Lou Reu, B.A., M.S., PA-C 
Emergency Care Consultants
Chief Complaint: Flu-like Symptoms 
 HPI: The patient is a 43 y/o male with h/o DM, HTN, 
HLD, and obesity who presents to the ED with flu-like 
symptoms. He c/o feeling feverish with chills, 
diaphoresis, nausea and generalized body aches x 4-5 
days. He reports decreased appetite and has not been 
taking his home meds for the past few days d/t not 
feeling well. Sugars have been “high”. No temp taken at 
home. He denies headache, neck pain or stiffness, 
cough or URI symptoms, sore throat, runny nose, sinus 
congestion, earache, chest pain, SOB, abdominal pain, 
vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, urinary symptoms, 
rashes, recent illness or ill contacts and has no other 
complaints or concerns at this time.
History cont. 
 PMH: DM, HTN, HLD, obesity 
 PSH: None 
 Home Meds: ASA, Metformin, Lantus, Lipitor, Losartan 
 Allergies: NKDA 
 SH: Lives at home with wife. Former smoker. Daily drinker 
(reports 4 beers daily). 
 FH: Noncontributory
ROS – pertinent positives and negatives 
 General: feverish with 
chills, diaphoresis, 
decreased appetite 
 HEENT: no headache, sore 
throat, runny nose, sinus 
congestion, earache 
 CV: no chest pain 
 Pulm: no cough, sputum, 
or SOB 
 GI: nausea without 
vomiting, no diarrhea or 
constipation 
 GU: denies urinary 
complaints 
 MS: myalgias, denies neck 
pain/stiffness 
 Skin: denies rash
Physical Exam 
 Vitals: T 102.2 HR 114 BP 104/87 RR 22 Sats 98% on RA 
 General: lethargic, appears ill, diaphoretic, uncomfortable, 
mild distress 
 HEENT: NC/AT, PERRLA, conjunctiva clear, sclera white, 
EOMI, EACs clear, TMs noninjected with good light reflex, dry 
mucous membranes, no oropharyngeal edema, erythema, or 
exudate, uvula midline 
 Neck: soft, supple, no LAD, no meningeal signs 
 CV: regular rhythm, tachycardic, no m/r/g
Physical Exam cont. 
 Pulm: Tachypneic, Lungs CTAB, no wheezing or rales 
 Abdomen: obese, soft, nondistended, nontender, normal 
bowel sounds 
 MS: Extremities warm, well perfused, no cyanosis, clubbing, 
edema, SILT, MAE 
 Neuro: lethargic, oriented x 3, CN II-XII grossly intact 
 Skin: good color, warm to touch, diaphoresis noted
Differential Diagnosis 
 F/C, diaphoresis, decreased appetite, nausea, myalgias 
 Influenza or viral illness 
 Otitis media/externa 
 Sinusitis 
 Bacterial or viral pharyngitis 
 Pneumonia 
 Gastroenteritis 
 UTI/pyelonephritis 
* Wait! After family leaves the room, the nurse tells you that the 
patient has something he wants to show you. *
The rest of the story… 
 Upon reassessment, the patient tells you that he has a 
“problem” in his groin area. 
 You pull back the blanket, and to your surprise...
GU Exam 
 Erythematous, edematous scrotum with warmth and 
exquisite tenderness on palpation. Malodor noted. Necrotic 
tissue, midline scrotum and dorsal penile shaft. No open 
lesions or active drainage. Erythema extending onto 
abdominal wall, perineum and bilateral proximal thighs with 
bogginess and crepitus.
Reconsider the Differential 
 Scrotal pain and swelling 
 Cellulitis 
 Gonococcal balanitis 
 Epididymitis or orchitis 
 Strangulated hernia 
 Scrotal abscess 
 Testicular torsion 
 Hydrocele or Varicocele 
 Vascular occlusion syndromes 
 Polyarteritis nodosa 
 Warfarin necrosis
Don’t Miss the Obvious!!! 
 Fever, lethargy, severe scrotal pain and swelling with 
erythema, crepitus +/- necrotic tissue should raise suspicion 
of necrotizing fasciitis of the genitalia, or… 
Fournier’s Gangrene! 
 Failure to examine the genitals, especially in diabetics or 
immunocompromised patients, can result in misdiagnosis 
and delay in treatment!!!
Labs – Sepsis Workup 
 CMP: Na 133, K 4.1, Glucose 417, Cr 1.5, bicarb 26 
 CBC: WBC 15.5, Hgb 12.2, HCT 37.2 PLT 255 
 UA/UC: pending 
 INR: 1.2 
 Lactate: 1.6 
 Blood cultures x 2: pending
Imaging 
 Do not delay early surgical debridement for imaging studies. 
Delay will result in a negative impact on prognosis! 
 24-hour delay increases mortality rate by 11.5%, 6-day delay by 
76%.
Fournier's Gangrene 
 First described in 1764 by Baurienne. Named after French 
venereologist, Alfred Jean Fournier, in 1883. 
 Aggressive, rapidly spreading infection of soft tissue, or necrotizing 
fasciitis, that affects the genitalia, perineal, and/or perianal regions. 
 Ten times more common in men, but can affect women and even 
children. 
 Rare, but life threatening! 
 High mortality rate (20-30%, some reports as high as 50%), despite 
advanced management.
Epidemiology and Etiology 
 Etiology 
 Perineal and genital skin infections (scrotal or anorectal abscess) 
 Urethral stricture 
 Anorectal, urogenital and perineal trauma (including genital piercing and intracavernosal 
cocaine injection) 
 Iatrogenic (indwelling catheter, traumatic catheterization, prostatic or rectal biopsy, anal 
dilatation, hemorrhoidectomy, vasectomy, penile implant, hydrocele aspiration) 
 Nidus typically from GI tract (30-50%), GU tract (20-40%), and cutaneous injuries (20%). 
 Associated Comorbidities: 
 DM (20-70%), alcoholism (25-50%), immunosuppression (including malnutrition, SLE, 
Crohn’s, chronic corticosteroid use, chemotherapy, HIV, liver disease, IVDA, and, less likely, 
bone marrow malignancy) 
 Onset to presentation, on average, 5 days.
Microbiology 
 Polymicrobial infections by aerobes and anaerobes: 
 Enterobacter, esp. E coli 
 Klebsiella 
 Bacteroides 
 Streptococci 
 Staphylocci 
 Clostridia 
 Pseudomonas 
 Most are normal flora in the perineum and genitalia, most common 
E coli. 
 On average, at least 3 organisms cultured from each patient.
Pathophysiology 
Portal of entry of microorganism into perineum/genitalia 
Impaired host cellular immunity = favorable environment to permit 
infection 
Virulence in synergy promotes rapid spread and extensive tissue damage 
Microvascular thrombosis leading to cutaneous and subcutaneous 
necrosis, facilitating bacterial proliferation along fascial planes
Clinical Presentation 
 Most common presenting complaints: 
 Fever, lethargy – first sign 
 Intense scrotal pain and tenderness with edema - hallmark 
 Cellulitis 
 Fetid odor 
 Crepitus/Fluctuance (gas producing organisms) 
 As inflammation worsens, necrotic tissue appears. Fascial necrosis is 
usually more extensive than visible gangrene suggests. 
 Infection can spread up the entire anterior abdominal wall, up to the 
clavicle. 
 Rapid progression to multi-organ failure secondary to Gm – sepsis, the 
most common cause of death.
Diagnosis 
 Primarily clinical (HIGH clinical index of suspicion) 
 Labs (CBC, CMP, Coag studies, Lactate, Blood cultures, 
Wound cultures – intraoperative) 
 Surgical consult 
 Imaging ??? 
 Early surgical exploration and debridement of all necrotic 
tissue – definitive diagnosis 
 Clinical predictive values (LRINEC or FGSI)
Imaging 
 May be useful in atypical presentation or questionable true 
extent of disease. 
 Plain radiographs 
 May show air in tissue. 
 Ultrasonography 
 Differentiate intrascrotal abnormality; shows thickened, swollen 
scrotal wall containing gas. 
 CT and MRI 
 Diagnose or rule out retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal process.
LRINEC Score – Laboratory Risk Indicator 
for Necrotizing Fasciitis Score
Fournier’s Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI)
Clinical Predictive Scores 
 LRINEC can be used to risk stratify patients with cellulitis to 
determine the likelihood of necrotizing fasciitis being 
present. 
 A LRINEC score ≥ 6 should raise suspicion of necrotizing fasciitis 
among patients with severe soft tissue infections. 
 A LRINEC score ≥ 8 is strongly predictive of this disease. 
 FGSI is useful to help predict outcome. 
 A FGSI score > 9 is associated with a 75% death rate. 
 A FGSI score of < 9 is associated with 78% survival. 
 One study quoted, a FGSI score of > 10.5 is associated with 96% 
death and a score of < 10.5 is associated with 96% survival.
Treatment 
 Aggressive multimodal approach. 
 Hemodynamic stabilization – aggressive fluid resuscitation. 
 Broad spectrum triple antibiotics – cover Gm +, Gm – and 
Anaerobes (Zosyn and Vanco , PLUS Clindamycin for anti-toxin 
effects against toxin-elaborating strains of strep and 
staph). Narrowed based on culture and sensitivities. 
Early surgical debridement - primary 
component of treatment (Average 3.5 
procedures per patient).
Treatment cont. 
 Hyperbaric Oxygen – believed to be effective adjunct, though no 
conclusive evidence regarding effectiveness. 
 Neutralizes anaerobes, improves neutrophil function, increased 
fibroblast proliferation, promotes angiogenesis. 
 Honey ??? – natural antimicrobial, digests necrotic tissue, 
accelerates healing by stimulating growth and multiplication of 
epithelial cells. 
 Wound VAC – minimizes contamination and skin defects, as well as 
speeds tissue healing. 
 Plastics Reconstruction – split-thickness graft to repair perineal and 
scrotal defects.
Fournier’s Gangrene: Report of Thirty-Three 
Cases and a Review of the Literature 
Group 1 
 21 patients, mean age 57 
 Broad spectrum antibiotics 
 Broad debridement (avg 3) 
 Exhaustive cleaning 
 Split-thickness skin grafts or 
delayed closure 
Group 2 
 12 patients, mean age 48 
 Broad spectrum antibiotics 
 One debridement per patient 
 Unprocessed honey daily 
 Own new scrotal skin (4 
patients) or secondary 
suturing (8 patients)
Results 
Group 1 
 Older, multiple comorbidites, 
more extensive disease 
 Longer hospitalization (4.5 
weeks) 
 Three patients died – severe 
sepsis 
 Worse clinical and cosmetic 
results 
Group 2 
 Younger, healthier, more 
localized disease 
 Shorter hospitalization (4 
weeks) 
 No deaths 
 Better clinical and cosmetic 
results
Back to the Case 
 Started on Zosyn/Vanc/Clindamycin 
 2L IVF resuscitation 
 NPO 
 To OR for emergent debridement 
 LRINEC score 7 (intermediate risk for necrotizing fasciitis) 
 FGIS score 8 (>78% chance of survival)
After Debridement
Plastics Reconstruction
Summary 
 Fournier's Gangrene is BAD. Mortality rates remain high, despite 
aggressive management. Long term complications for those who 
survive (pain, sexual dysfunction, infertility, extensive scarring). 
 HIGH clinical index of suspicion, especially in diabetics, alcoholics, and 
patient’s with immunosuppression. 
 Low threshold for Surgical consult and early operative intervention. 
 Broad spectrum antibiotics. 
 +/- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy. 
 Honey – reduce cost, morbidity and mortality ??? 
 Clinical predictive scores useful to help predict outcome.
Questions ???
References 
 Burch DM, Barreiro TJ, Vanek VW. Fournier’s gangrene: Be alert for 
this medical emergency. JAAPA Nov 2007; 20(11):44-47. 
 Kessler CS, Baum J. Non-Traumatic Urologic Emergencies in Men: A 
Clinical Review. West J Emerg Med. Nov 2009; 10(4): 281-287. 
 Mallikarjuna, MN. Vijayakumar, A, Patil, VS, et al. Fournier’s 
Gangrene: Current Practices. ISRN Surgery, Vol. 2012, Article ID 
942437, 8 pages, 2012. 
 Pastore, et al. A multistep approach to manage Fournier’s gangrene 
in a patient with unknown type II diabetes: surgery, hyperbaric 
oxygen, and vacuum-assisted closure therapy: a case report. 
Journal of Medical Case Reports 2013, 7:1.
References cont. 
 Rahmaz L, Erdemir R, Kibar Y, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: 
Report of thirty-three cases and a review of the literature. 
International Journal of Urology, 12: 960-967. 
 Stevens, DL, Baddour, LM. (2014). Necrotizing soft tissue 
infections. In: UpToDate, Sexton DJ, Edwards MS, (Ed), 
UpToDate, Waltham, MA, 2014. 
 Thwaini A, Khan A, Malik A, et al. Fournier’s gangrene and it’s 
emergency management. Postgrad Med J. Aug 2006; 
82(970):516-519.

Fournier's gangrene

  • 1.
    Fournier’s Gangrene: AUrologic Emergency You Don’t Want to Miss! Angela Lou Reu, B.A., M.S., PA-C Emergency Care Consultants
  • 2.
    Chief Complaint: Flu-likeSymptoms  HPI: The patient is a 43 y/o male with h/o DM, HTN, HLD, and obesity who presents to the ED with flu-like symptoms. He c/o feeling feverish with chills, diaphoresis, nausea and generalized body aches x 4-5 days. He reports decreased appetite and has not been taking his home meds for the past few days d/t not feeling well. Sugars have been “high”. No temp taken at home. He denies headache, neck pain or stiffness, cough or URI symptoms, sore throat, runny nose, sinus congestion, earache, chest pain, SOB, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, urinary symptoms, rashes, recent illness or ill contacts and has no other complaints or concerns at this time.
  • 3.
    History cont. PMH: DM, HTN, HLD, obesity  PSH: None  Home Meds: ASA, Metformin, Lantus, Lipitor, Losartan  Allergies: NKDA  SH: Lives at home with wife. Former smoker. Daily drinker (reports 4 beers daily).  FH: Noncontributory
  • 4.
    ROS – pertinentpositives and negatives  General: feverish with chills, diaphoresis, decreased appetite  HEENT: no headache, sore throat, runny nose, sinus congestion, earache  CV: no chest pain  Pulm: no cough, sputum, or SOB  GI: nausea without vomiting, no diarrhea or constipation  GU: denies urinary complaints  MS: myalgias, denies neck pain/stiffness  Skin: denies rash
  • 5.
    Physical Exam Vitals: T 102.2 HR 114 BP 104/87 RR 22 Sats 98% on RA  General: lethargic, appears ill, diaphoretic, uncomfortable, mild distress  HEENT: NC/AT, PERRLA, conjunctiva clear, sclera white, EOMI, EACs clear, TMs noninjected with good light reflex, dry mucous membranes, no oropharyngeal edema, erythema, or exudate, uvula midline  Neck: soft, supple, no LAD, no meningeal signs  CV: regular rhythm, tachycardic, no m/r/g
  • 6.
    Physical Exam cont.  Pulm: Tachypneic, Lungs CTAB, no wheezing or rales  Abdomen: obese, soft, nondistended, nontender, normal bowel sounds  MS: Extremities warm, well perfused, no cyanosis, clubbing, edema, SILT, MAE  Neuro: lethargic, oriented x 3, CN II-XII grossly intact  Skin: good color, warm to touch, diaphoresis noted
  • 7.
    Differential Diagnosis F/C, diaphoresis, decreased appetite, nausea, myalgias  Influenza or viral illness  Otitis media/externa  Sinusitis  Bacterial or viral pharyngitis  Pneumonia  Gastroenteritis  UTI/pyelonephritis * Wait! After family leaves the room, the nurse tells you that the patient has something he wants to show you. *
  • 8.
    The rest ofthe story…  Upon reassessment, the patient tells you that he has a “problem” in his groin area.  You pull back the blanket, and to your surprise...
  • 9.
    GU Exam Erythematous, edematous scrotum with warmth and exquisite tenderness on palpation. Malodor noted. Necrotic tissue, midline scrotum and dorsal penile shaft. No open lesions or active drainage. Erythema extending onto abdominal wall, perineum and bilateral proximal thighs with bogginess and crepitus.
  • 10.
    Reconsider the Differential  Scrotal pain and swelling  Cellulitis  Gonococcal balanitis  Epididymitis or orchitis  Strangulated hernia  Scrotal abscess  Testicular torsion  Hydrocele or Varicocele  Vascular occlusion syndromes  Polyarteritis nodosa  Warfarin necrosis
  • 11.
    Don’t Miss theObvious!!!  Fever, lethargy, severe scrotal pain and swelling with erythema, crepitus +/- necrotic tissue should raise suspicion of necrotizing fasciitis of the genitalia, or… Fournier’s Gangrene!  Failure to examine the genitals, especially in diabetics or immunocompromised patients, can result in misdiagnosis and delay in treatment!!!
  • 12.
    Labs – SepsisWorkup  CMP: Na 133, K 4.1, Glucose 417, Cr 1.5, bicarb 26  CBC: WBC 15.5, Hgb 12.2, HCT 37.2 PLT 255  UA/UC: pending  INR: 1.2  Lactate: 1.6  Blood cultures x 2: pending
  • 13.
    Imaging  Donot delay early surgical debridement for imaging studies. Delay will result in a negative impact on prognosis!  24-hour delay increases mortality rate by 11.5%, 6-day delay by 76%.
  • 14.
    Fournier's Gangrene First described in 1764 by Baurienne. Named after French venereologist, Alfred Jean Fournier, in 1883.  Aggressive, rapidly spreading infection of soft tissue, or necrotizing fasciitis, that affects the genitalia, perineal, and/or perianal regions.  Ten times more common in men, but can affect women and even children.  Rare, but life threatening!  High mortality rate (20-30%, some reports as high as 50%), despite advanced management.
  • 15.
    Epidemiology and Etiology  Etiology  Perineal and genital skin infections (scrotal or anorectal abscess)  Urethral stricture  Anorectal, urogenital and perineal trauma (including genital piercing and intracavernosal cocaine injection)  Iatrogenic (indwelling catheter, traumatic catheterization, prostatic or rectal biopsy, anal dilatation, hemorrhoidectomy, vasectomy, penile implant, hydrocele aspiration)  Nidus typically from GI tract (30-50%), GU tract (20-40%), and cutaneous injuries (20%).  Associated Comorbidities:  DM (20-70%), alcoholism (25-50%), immunosuppression (including malnutrition, SLE, Crohn’s, chronic corticosteroid use, chemotherapy, HIV, liver disease, IVDA, and, less likely, bone marrow malignancy)  Onset to presentation, on average, 5 days.
  • 16.
    Microbiology  Polymicrobialinfections by aerobes and anaerobes:  Enterobacter, esp. E coli  Klebsiella  Bacteroides  Streptococci  Staphylocci  Clostridia  Pseudomonas  Most are normal flora in the perineum and genitalia, most common E coli.  On average, at least 3 organisms cultured from each patient.
  • 17.
    Pathophysiology Portal ofentry of microorganism into perineum/genitalia Impaired host cellular immunity = favorable environment to permit infection Virulence in synergy promotes rapid spread and extensive tissue damage Microvascular thrombosis leading to cutaneous and subcutaneous necrosis, facilitating bacterial proliferation along fascial planes
  • 18.
    Clinical Presentation Most common presenting complaints:  Fever, lethargy – first sign  Intense scrotal pain and tenderness with edema - hallmark  Cellulitis  Fetid odor  Crepitus/Fluctuance (gas producing organisms)  As inflammation worsens, necrotic tissue appears. Fascial necrosis is usually more extensive than visible gangrene suggests.  Infection can spread up the entire anterior abdominal wall, up to the clavicle.  Rapid progression to multi-organ failure secondary to Gm – sepsis, the most common cause of death.
  • 19.
    Diagnosis  Primarilyclinical (HIGH clinical index of suspicion)  Labs (CBC, CMP, Coag studies, Lactate, Blood cultures, Wound cultures – intraoperative)  Surgical consult  Imaging ???  Early surgical exploration and debridement of all necrotic tissue – definitive diagnosis  Clinical predictive values (LRINEC or FGSI)
  • 20.
    Imaging  Maybe useful in atypical presentation or questionable true extent of disease.  Plain radiographs  May show air in tissue.  Ultrasonography  Differentiate intrascrotal abnormality; shows thickened, swollen scrotal wall containing gas.  CT and MRI  Diagnose or rule out retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal process.
  • 21.
    LRINEC Score –Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis Score
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Clinical Predictive Scores  LRINEC can be used to risk stratify patients with cellulitis to determine the likelihood of necrotizing fasciitis being present.  A LRINEC score ≥ 6 should raise suspicion of necrotizing fasciitis among patients with severe soft tissue infections.  A LRINEC score ≥ 8 is strongly predictive of this disease.  FGSI is useful to help predict outcome.  A FGSI score > 9 is associated with a 75% death rate.  A FGSI score of < 9 is associated with 78% survival.  One study quoted, a FGSI score of > 10.5 is associated with 96% death and a score of < 10.5 is associated with 96% survival.
  • 24.
    Treatment  Aggressivemultimodal approach.  Hemodynamic stabilization – aggressive fluid resuscitation.  Broad spectrum triple antibiotics – cover Gm +, Gm – and Anaerobes (Zosyn and Vanco , PLUS Clindamycin for anti-toxin effects against toxin-elaborating strains of strep and staph). Narrowed based on culture and sensitivities. Early surgical debridement - primary component of treatment (Average 3.5 procedures per patient).
  • 25.
    Treatment cont. Hyperbaric Oxygen – believed to be effective adjunct, though no conclusive evidence regarding effectiveness.  Neutralizes anaerobes, improves neutrophil function, increased fibroblast proliferation, promotes angiogenesis.  Honey ??? – natural antimicrobial, digests necrotic tissue, accelerates healing by stimulating growth and multiplication of epithelial cells.  Wound VAC – minimizes contamination and skin defects, as well as speeds tissue healing.  Plastics Reconstruction – split-thickness graft to repair perineal and scrotal defects.
  • 26.
    Fournier’s Gangrene: Reportof Thirty-Three Cases and a Review of the Literature Group 1  21 patients, mean age 57  Broad spectrum antibiotics  Broad debridement (avg 3)  Exhaustive cleaning  Split-thickness skin grafts or delayed closure Group 2  12 patients, mean age 48  Broad spectrum antibiotics  One debridement per patient  Unprocessed honey daily  Own new scrotal skin (4 patients) or secondary suturing (8 patients)
  • 27.
    Results Group 1  Older, multiple comorbidites, more extensive disease  Longer hospitalization (4.5 weeks)  Three patients died – severe sepsis  Worse clinical and cosmetic results Group 2  Younger, healthier, more localized disease  Shorter hospitalization (4 weeks)  No deaths  Better clinical and cosmetic results
  • 28.
    Back to theCase  Started on Zosyn/Vanc/Clindamycin  2L IVF resuscitation  NPO  To OR for emergent debridement  LRINEC score 7 (intermediate risk for necrotizing fasciitis)  FGIS score 8 (>78% chance of survival)
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
    Summary  Fournier'sGangrene is BAD. Mortality rates remain high, despite aggressive management. Long term complications for those who survive (pain, sexual dysfunction, infertility, extensive scarring).  HIGH clinical index of suspicion, especially in diabetics, alcoholics, and patient’s with immunosuppression.  Low threshold for Surgical consult and early operative intervention.  Broad spectrum antibiotics.  +/- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy.  Honey – reduce cost, morbidity and mortality ???  Clinical predictive scores useful to help predict outcome.
  • 32.
  • 33.
    References  BurchDM, Barreiro TJ, Vanek VW. Fournier’s gangrene: Be alert for this medical emergency. JAAPA Nov 2007; 20(11):44-47.  Kessler CS, Baum J. Non-Traumatic Urologic Emergencies in Men: A Clinical Review. West J Emerg Med. Nov 2009; 10(4): 281-287.  Mallikarjuna, MN. Vijayakumar, A, Patil, VS, et al. Fournier’s Gangrene: Current Practices. ISRN Surgery, Vol. 2012, Article ID 942437, 8 pages, 2012.  Pastore, et al. A multistep approach to manage Fournier’s gangrene in a patient with unknown type II diabetes: surgery, hyperbaric oxygen, and vacuum-assisted closure therapy: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports 2013, 7:1.
  • 34.
    References cont. Rahmaz L, Erdemir R, Kibar Y, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: Report of thirty-three cases and a review of the literature. International Journal of Urology, 12: 960-967.  Stevens, DL, Baddour, LM. (2014). Necrotizing soft tissue infections. In: UpToDate, Sexton DJ, Edwards MS, (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA, 2014.  Thwaini A, Khan A, Malik A, et al. Fournier’s gangrene and it’s emergency management. Postgrad Med J. Aug 2006; 82(970):516-519.