SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
Court No. - 9
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5268 of 2022
Petitioner :- Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman And 3 Others
Respondent :- U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashank Singh,Sr. Advocate
Counsel for Respondent :- Punit Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard Dr. Adish C. Aggarwala, learned Senior Advocate
assisted by Sri Abhinav Singh and Sri Shashank Singh, learned
counsels for petitioners as well as Sri Punit Kumar Gupta, and
Ms. Poorva Agarwal, learned counsel for U.P. Sunni Central
Waqf Board-respondent no.1 and perused the record.
Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to the Civil
Judge(Senior Division), Mathura to decide the application dated
14.4.2021 bearing No. 14-Ga under section 45 of the Evidence
Act and the Provisions of Rule 10-A of Order XXVI of the
Code of Civil Procedure for conducting Scientific
Investigation of Shahi Eidgah and Jahanara's Masque" in Civil
Suit No. 151 of 2021 (Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and
others vs. U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board and others) within a
stipulated time period.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the
suit was filed by plaintiffs-petitioners for cancellation of
judgment and decree dated 20.7.1973 and 7.11.1974 passed by
Civil Judge, Mathura in Civil Suit No. 43 of 1967 as well as for
removal of encroachment. The petitioners had also moved an
application on 14.4.2021 for expert's opinion which is paper
No. 14-Ga. It is further submitted that although respondents
have been served but they have not filed any objection to the
application dated 14.4.2021(Paper No. 14-Ga).
Sri Punit Kumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for
respondent no.1 has submitted that respondent no. 1 had also
filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. on 16.7.2022
which is also pending for consideration and he has no objection
if both the applications are expedited and decided
simultaneously.
Without going into merit of the case, it is appropriate that the
above applications be decided expeditiously.
In view of above, Civil Judge(Senior Division), Mathura/Court
concerned is directed to decide the application dated
14.4.2021(Paper No. 14-Ga) of the plaintiffs-petitioners and the
application filed by respondent no.1 under Order 7 Rule 11
C.P.C. dated 16.7.2022 in Civil Suit No. 151 of 2021 (Bhagwan
Shrikrishna Virajman and others vs. U.P. Sunni Central Waqf
Board and others) expeditiously, if possible within three months
from the date of production of certified copy of this order after
affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and
without granting adjournment unnecessarily to either of the
parties, unless there is any legal impediment.
With aforesaid direction, the instant petition under Article 227
of the Constitution of India is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 18.7.2022
P.P.
Digitally signed by POONAM PATEL
Date: 2022.07.18 17:32:41 IST
Reason:
Location: High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad

More Related Content

Similar to 20220718 Allahabad HC on Krishna Janmabhommi Scientific Investogation.pdf

Varavara rao bail order feb 22
Varavara rao bail order feb 22Varavara rao bail order feb 22
Varavara rao bail order feb 22sabrangsabrang
 
SC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake case
SC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake caseSC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake case
SC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake caseGibran Ashraf
 
kafeel Khan Order 9 9-21
kafeel Khan Order  9 9-21kafeel Khan Order  9 9-21
kafeel Khan Order 9 9-21sabrangsabrang
 
33164_2022_2_301_39179_Order_15-Oct-2022.pdf
33164_2022_2_301_39179_Order_15-Oct-2022.pdf33164_2022_2_301_39179_Order_15-Oct-2022.pdf
33164_2022_2_301_39179_Order_15-Oct-2022.pdfsabrangsabrang
 
Allahabad hc nov 17 order undertrial
Allahabad hc nov 17 order undertrialAllahabad hc nov 17 order undertrial
Allahabad hc nov 17 order undertrialZahidManiyar
 
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ftsabrangsabrang
 
Nanuram saini and ors v state of raj
Nanuram saini and ors v state of rajNanuram saini and ors v state of raj
Nanuram saini and ors v state of rajZahidManiyar
 
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdfrajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdfsabrangsabrang
 
Abhishek, sanjeev v state of up
Abhishek, sanjeev v state of upAbhishek, sanjeev v state of up
Abhishek, sanjeev v state of upsabrangsabrang
 
UP Chief Secretary Summoned: May 5, 2017 Order of the Allahabad High Court
UP Chief Secretary Summoned: May 5, 2017 Order of the Allahabad High CourtUP Chief Secretary Summoned: May 5, 2017 Order of the Allahabad High Court
UP Chief Secretary Summoned: May 5, 2017 Order of the Allahabad High Courtsabrangsabrang
 
Exhibit of oral and documentory evidence
Exhibit of oral and documentory evidenceExhibit of oral and documentory evidence
Exhibit of oral and documentory evidenceArjun Randhir
 
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659ZahidManiyar
 
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021sabrangsabrang
 

Similar to 20220718 Allahabad HC on Krishna Janmabhommi Scientific Investogation.pdf (20)

Varavara rao bail order feb 22
Varavara rao bail order feb 22Varavara rao bail order feb 22
Varavara rao bail order feb 22
 
SC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake case
SC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake caseSC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake case
SC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake case
 
Adil v state of up
Adil v state of upAdil v state of up
Adil v state of up
 
Pp15
Pp15Pp15
Pp15
 
kafeel Khan Order 9 9-21
kafeel Khan Order  9 9-21kafeel Khan Order  9 9-21
kafeel Khan Order 9 9-21
 
33164_2022_2_301_39179_Order_15-Oct-2022.pdf
33164_2022_2_301_39179_Order_15-Oct-2022.pdf33164_2022_2_301_39179_Order_15-Oct-2022.pdf
33164_2022_2_301_39179_Order_15-Oct-2022.pdf
 
Bail(l) 13762 2021
Bail(l) 13762 2021Bail(l) 13762 2021
Bail(l) 13762 2021
 
Order_05-Jan-2023.pdf
Order_05-Jan-2023.pdfOrder_05-Jan-2023.pdf
Order_05-Jan-2023.pdf
 
Allahabad hc nov 17 order undertrial
Allahabad hc nov 17 order undertrialAllahabad hc nov 17 order undertrial
Allahabad hc nov 17 order undertrial
 
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
 
Nanuram saini and ors v state of raj
Nanuram saini and ors v state of rajNanuram saini and ors v state of raj
Nanuram saini and ors v state of raj
 
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdfrajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
rajasthan-high-court-news18-aman-chopra-416891.pdf
 
Abhishek, sanjeev v state of up
Abhishek, sanjeev v state of upAbhishek, sanjeev v state of up
Abhishek, sanjeev v state of up
 
Pp12
Pp12Pp12
Pp12
 
UP Chief Secretary Summoned: May 5, 2017 Order of the Allahabad High Court
UP Chief Secretary Summoned: May 5, 2017 Order of the Allahabad High CourtUP Chief Secretary Summoned: May 5, 2017 Order of the Allahabad High Court
UP Chief Secretary Summoned: May 5, 2017 Order of the Allahabad High Court
 
Exhibit of oral and documentory evidence
Exhibit of oral and documentory evidenceExhibit of oral and documentory evidence
Exhibit of oral and documentory evidence
 
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659
 
Sanjiv bhatt order
Sanjiv bhatt orderSanjiv bhatt order
Sanjiv bhatt order
 
Khalid v State.pdf
Khalid v State.pdfKhalid v State.pdf
Khalid v State.pdf
 
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021
 

Recently uploaded

Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)Mike Keyes
 
Dandan Liu is the worst real estate agent on earth..pdf
Dandan Liu is the worst real estate agent on earth..pdfDandan Liu is the worst real estate agent on earth..pdf
Dandan Liu is the worst real estate agent on earth..pdfbraydenstoch777
 
Bail, Disposal, Remand, Registration JD Sir.pptx
Bail, Disposal, Remand, Registration JD Sir.pptxBail, Disposal, Remand, Registration JD Sir.pptx
Bail, Disposal, Remand, Registration JD Sir.pptxRashmiPandey862734
 
A Brief Introduction About Katelyn Prost
A Brief Introduction About Katelyn ProstA Brief Introduction About Katelyn Prost
A Brief Introduction About Katelyn ProstKatelyn Prost
 
CHP 5 OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN.pptx
CHP 5 OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN.pptxCHP 5 OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN.pptx
CHP 5 OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN.pptxRashmiPandey862734
 
dandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdf
dandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdfdandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdf
dandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdfbraydenstoch777
 
REVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODS
REVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODSREVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODS
REVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODSCheong Man Keong
 
Protection Against Arrest and Detention art 2223 and 24.pptx
Protection Against Arrest and Detention art 2223 and 24.pptxProtection Against Arrest and Detention art 2223 and 24.pptx
Protection Against Arrest and Detention art 2223 and 24.pptxAkom8
 
Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...
Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...
Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...Leks&Co
 
Mergers and Acquisitions in Kenya - An explanation
Mergers and Acquisitions in Kenya - An explanationMergers and Acquisitions in Kenya - An explanation
Mergers and Acquisitions in Kenya - An explanationRovert3
 
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal ServicesStreamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal ServicesEternity Paralegal Services
 
Indian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of Partners
Indian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of PartnersIndian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of Partners
Indian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of Partnersshrishtijain1809
 
Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.
Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.
Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.aniruddhabamal
 
Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.shrishtijain1809
 
Does Apple Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?
Does Apple  Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?Does Apple  Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?
Does Apple Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?Graham Ware
 
Embed-1-4.pdf Decision of the High Court
Embed-1-4.pdf Decision of the High CourtEmbed-1-4.pdf Decision of the High Court
Embed-1-4.pdf Decision of the High Courtbhavenpr
 
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...AvinashMittal5
 
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South AfricaSolidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South AfricaUniversity of Ferrara
 
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of lawsApplication of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of lawsanvithaav
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
 
Dandan Liu is the worst real estate agent on earth..pdf
Dandan Liu is the worst real estate agent on earth..pdfDandan Liu is the worst real estate agent on earth..pdf
Dandan Liu is the worst real estate agent on earth..pdf
 
Bail, Disposal, Remand, Registration JD Sir.pptx
Bail, Disposal, Remand, Registration JD Sir.pptxBail, Disposal, Remand, Registration JD Sir.pptx
Bail, Disposal, Remand, Registration JD Sir.pptx
 
A Brief Introduction About Katelyn Prost
A Brief Introduction About Katelyn ProstA Brief Introduction About Katelyn Prost
A Brief Introduction About Katelyn Prost
 
CHP 5 OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN.pptx
CHP 5 OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN.pptxCHP 5 OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN.pptx
CHP 5 OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN.pptx
 
dandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdf
dandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdfdandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdf
dandan liu need to rot when she dies..pdf
 
REVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODS
REVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODSREVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODS
REVIVING OUR STAR GOD IMAGES FROM MARRYING OUR 4 HOLY LAWS OF STAR GODS
 
Protection Against Arrest and Detention art 2223 and 24.pptx
Protection Against Arrest and Detention art 2223 and 24.pptxProtection Against Arrest and Detention art 2223 and 24.pptx
Protection Against Arrest and Detention art 2223 and 24.pptx
 
Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...
Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...
Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Procedure for Appointment of Arbitr...
 
Mergers and Acquisitions in Kenya - An explanation
Mergers and Acquisitions in Kenya - An explanationMergers and Acquisitions in Kenya - An explanation
Mergers and Acquisitions in Kenya - An explanation
 
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal ServicesStreamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
 
Indian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of Partners
Indian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of PartnersIndian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of Partners
Indian Partnership Act 1932, Rights and Duties of Partners
 
Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.
Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.
Starbucks Corp. v. Sardarbuksh Coffee Co.
 
Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Rights of Consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
 
Does Apple Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?
Does Apple  Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?Does Apple  Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?
Does Apple Neurotechnology Patents Go To Far?
 
Embed-1-4.pdf Decision of the High Court
Embed-1-4.pdf Decision of the High CourtEmbed-1-4.pdf Decision of the High Court
Embed-1-4.pdf Decision of the High Court
 
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
 
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South AfricaSolidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
 
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of lawsApplication of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
 
Justice Advocates Legal Defence Firm
Justice Advocates Legal Defence FirmJustice Advocates Legal Defence Firm
Justice Advocates Legal Defence Firm
 

20220718 Allahabad HC on Krishna Janmabhommi Scientific Investogation.pdf

  • 1. Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5268 of 2022 Petitioner :- Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman And 3 Others Respondent :- U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashank Singh,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Punit Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. Heard Dr. Adish C. Aggarwala, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Abhinav Singh and Sri Shashank Singh, learned counsels for petitioners as well as Sri Punit Kumar Gupta, and Ms. Poorva Agarwal, learned counsel for U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board-respondent no.1 and perused the record. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to the Civil Judge(Senior Division), Mathura to decide the application dated 14.4.2021 bearing No. 14-Ga under section 45 of the Evidence Act and the Provisions of Rule 10-A of Order XXVI of the Code of Civil Procedure for conducting Scientific Investigation of Shahi Eidgah and Jahanara's Masque" in Civil Suit No. 151 of 2021 (Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and others vs. U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board and others) within a stipulated time period. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the suit was filed by plaintiffs-petitioners for cancellation of judgment and decree dated 20.7.1973 and 7.11.1974 passed by Civil Judge, Mathura in Civil Suit No. 43 of 1967 as well as for removal of encroachment. The petitioners had also moved an application on 14.4.2021 for expert's opinion which is paper No. 14-Ga. It is further submitted that although respondents have been served but they have not filed any objection to the application dated 14.4.2021(Paper No. 14-Ga). Sri Punit Kumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 has submitted that respondent no. 1 had also filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. on 16.7.2022 which is also pending for consideration and he has no objection if both the applications are expedited and decided simultaneously. Without going into merit of the case, it is appropriate that the above applications be decided expeditiously. In view of above, Civil Judge(Senior Division), Mathura/Court concerned is directed to decide the application dated
  • 2. 14.4.2021(Paper No. 14-Ga) of the plaintiffs-petitioners and the application filed by respondent no.1 under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. dated 16.7.2022 in Civil Suit No. 151 of 2021 (Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and others vs. U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board and others) expeditiously, if possible within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting adjournment unnecessarily to either of the parties, unless there is any legal impediment. With aforesaid direction, the instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 18.7.2022 P.P. Digitally signed by POONAM PATEL Date: 2022.07.18 17:32:41 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad