Lessons about federations 151020
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•457 views
Presentation about the emerging lessons regarding GP federations. Presented at PCC event, London 20 Oct 2015
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Lessons about federations 151020
Similar to Lessons about federations 151020 (20)
More from Robert Varnam Coaching
More from Robert Varnam Coaching (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Lessons about federations 151020
- 1. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam Lessons about federations Dr Robert Varnam Head of general practice development @robertvarnam bit.ly/fedlessons1520
- 2. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam What size should we be? What form should we adopt? We’re a federation. What now? Top questions
- 4. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam An example of this in practice at the moment is the Prime Minister’s GP Access Fund. Now covering a significant proportion of the country, practices in this are implementing quite wide-ranging redesign of their services, acknowledging that extended hours are only one part of good access. The practices participating in this programme are already beginning to implement many of the transformational changes envisaged by the Five Year Forward View. This is generating valuable learning about the specific changes required, including the ways in which the system can make progress easier and more sustainable. Wave one Wave two 57 schemes 2500 practices 18m patients The Prime Minister’s Challenge Fund
- 5. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam What are PMCF schemes doing? Wider primary care at scale Reshape demand Active front-end Contact modes Match capacity & demand Rapid access model Extended hours Release capacity Service redesign team Broaden skillmix Complex care model Premises I.T. Workforce ServicecomponentsSystemenablers bit.ly/PMCFresources1
- 6. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam Back to the future? Top lessons so far
- 8. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam At the heart of the case for change is not the workload of practices – important though that is – it is the needs of patients, and they way they are changing. When the NHS was founded, its purpose was fairly simple. Every now and then, people got ill. When they did, they consulted their doctor. If it was a straightforward problem, they would give a prescription, the person would get better, return to work and, in a year or two, they might need the doctor again. If it was less straightforward, they would be referred to a clever doctor – who would give a prescription or cut out the offending part. The patient would then get better, return to work, and, in a year or two, they might become ill again. That accounted for the majority of the anticipated work of the NHS. And, for some patients, that’s still the kind of care that’s needed. However, a growing proportion of our work is fundamentally different. This now seminal chart illustrates the central fact underlying the quantitative and qualitative change in the work of primary care. It illustrates the rise in multimorbidity with age. As people get older, they have more simultaneous longterm conditions. So that, by the age of 75, for example, at least a third of people are living with four or more LTCs. And, as our demography changes, the proportion of older people increases. Dealing with longterm conditions already accounts for over half of work in primary care. It is set to increase. And, crucially, this represents a qualitative change in the nature of work. These are not people who visit the GP every year or two to get cured of their problem. These are people with problems that we cannot cure – they are living with multiple issues which will not go away, and they visit the GP six, seven, eight or more times a year. At least. Furthermore, the more simultaneous problems someone has, or the greater their frailty, the less helpful it is to pass their care to a doctor specialising in one part of the body. These people need treating as people, not diseases. So the population of people who need what only primary care can offer has grown, the amount of time they need has grown – and both are set to continue growing. This is the chief case for change in primary care, the pressure of patients’ needs. This is not a blip requiring a short-term correction to the priorities of the NHS. It is a fundamental shift which requires every developed nation on earth to turn away from what Muir Gray has termed the ‘century of the hospital’, and place the emphasis where the population’s need is. Scottish School of Primary Care Why change?
- 9. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam Purpose > function > formPurpose > function > formPurpose > function > formPurpose > function > formPurpose > function > formPurpose > function > formPurpose > function > formPurpose > function > form Top lessons so far
- 10. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam Association Network Federation Partnership Superpractice A federation by any other name… 5 yearsContemplation
- 11. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam Clarity Buy-in Agility Size Alignment Priorities Partnerships 2 300+ Only everything will suffice
- 12. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam • Monthly colloquium • Quarterly colloquium • Committee • Executive team • The Boss Decision making Face-to-face visits Bulletin Online forum Surveys
- 13. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam Outsourced management Spare time New managers Distributed leadership Leadership & infrastructure Vision-casting Data gathering Programme management I.T. Procurement Workforce Mobilisation Governance Practice engagement Patient engagement Stakeholder partnerships Analysis
- 14. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam 1. Stop obsessing about form 2. Create shared purpose 3. Invest in development 4. Design the form deliberately Top tips
- 15. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam Purpose > function > formPurpose > function > formPurpose > function > form 1. Stop obsessing about form Purpose > function > form Pick something to improve for patients Improve it together Build infrastructure to support & sustain
- 16. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam 2. Create shared purpose • A sense of shared identity sufficiently strong to allow collaboration that crosses boundaries of organisational sovereignty. • We share ideas, data, resources • We will adopt a standard approach • We can call on each other • A purpose beyond ourselves, orienting us around the needs of our patients. • Commitment to us and our purpose sufficiently strong to make compliance unnecessary
- 17. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam 3. Invest in development
- 18. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam Leadership Creating shared purpose Strategic planning & partnerships Leading through change Being a leader Improvement Patients as partners Processes and systems Using data for improvement Rapid cycle change Business Governance Operations management HR Business intelligence Capabilities Enablers Innovation spread Policies & permissions Contracts & incentives Infrastructure Productive federation Transparent measurement 3. Invest in development What do teams and individuals need? These are interdependent How can the system catalyse & accelerate change?
- 19. www.england.nhs.uk @robertvarnam At an organisational level, what will wider primary care at scale look like? Again, the precise details should be locally determined. But we should aim for it to be bigger, in a way that brings real patient to patients and staff, not just creating a new organisation because it makes us feel safer. Our new networks, federations or mergers should have enhanced capabilities, for leadership, management, services and improvement. We also need to ensure that, as we operate at large scale, we maintain the personal care which is so hugely important for many patients (and staff). That will take deliberate design: it won’t just happen. Finally, it should like it’s ‘yours’ – by which I mean that staff will need to have the same sense of belonging, ownership and commitment as in the best practices now. Regardless of the actual business model. That, too, will take planning and skill. At an organisational level, what will wider primary care at scale look like? Again, the precise details should be locally determined. But we should aim for it to be bigger, in a way that brings real patient to patients and staff, not just creating a new organisation because it makes us feel safer. Our new networks, federations or mergers should have enhanced capabilities, for leadership, management, services and improvement. We also need to ensure that, as we operate at large scale, we maintain the personal care which is so hugely important for many patients (and staff). That will take deliberate design: it won’t just happen. Finally, it should like it’s ‘yours’ – by which I mean that staff will need to have the same sense of belonging, ownership and commitment as in the best practices now. Regardless of the actual business model. That, too, will take planning and skill. 4. Design the form deliberately Bigger Personal Capable Connected
Editor's Notes
- ** ADD NARRATIVE TO EVERY SLIDE ** NB Each slide has white text in the background, to provide narrative notes for SlideShare
- An example of this in practice at the moment is the Prime Minister’s GP Access Fund. Now covering a significant proportion of the country, practices in this are implementing quite wide-ranging redesign of their services, acknowledging that extended hours are only one part of good access. The practices participating in this programme are already beginning to implement many of the transformational changes envisaged by the Five Year Forward View. This is generating valuable learning about the specific changes required, including the ways in which the system can make progress easier and more sustainable.
- At the heart of the case for change is not the workload of practices – important though that is – it is the needs of patients, and they way they are changing. When the NHS was founded, its purpose was fairly simple. Every now and then, people got ill. When they did, they consulted their doctor. If it was a straightforward problem, they would give a prescription, the person would get better, return to work and, in a year or two, they might need the doctor again. If it was less straightforward, they would be referred to a clever doctor – who would give a prescription or cut out the offending part. The patient would then get better, return to work, and, in a year or two, they might become ill again. That accounted for the majority of the anticipated work of the NHS. And, for some patients, that’s still the kind of care that’s needed. However, a growing proportion of our work is fundamentally different. This now seminal chart illustrates the central fact underlying the quantitative and qualitative change in the work of primary care. It illustrates the rise in multimorbidity with age. As people get older, they have more simultaneous longterm conditions. So that, by the age of 75, for example, at least a third of people are living with four or more LTCs. And, as our demography changes, the proportion of older people increases. Dealing with longterm conditions already accounts for over half of work in primary care. It is set to increase. And, crucially, this represents a qualitative change in the nature of work. These are not people who visit the GP every year or two to get cured of their problem. These are people with problems that we cannot cure – they are living with multiple issues which will not go away, and they visit the GP six, seven, eight or more times a year. At least. Furthermore, the more simultaneous problems someone has, or the greater their frailty, the less helpful it is to pass their care to a doctor specialising in one part of the body. These people need treating as people, not diseases. So the population of people who need what only primary care can offer has grown, the amount of time they need has grown – and both are set to continue growing. This is the chief case for change in primary care, the pressure of patients’ needs. This is not a blip requiring a short-term correction to the priorities of the NHS. It is a fundamental shift which requires every developed nation on earth to turn away from what Muir Gray has termed the ‘century of the hospital’, and place the emphasis where the population’s need is.
- One of the tasks of the Call to Action was to identify the actions necessary to promote, support and sustain the adoption of the kind of innovation and improvements we seek. We consulted with practice managers, clinicians, commissioners, policy makers and improvement experts, as well as drawing on the experience of building primary care improvement capability in the UK and internationally. A comprehensive list of areas emerged from this process. This has been tested and refined through ongoing consultation with innovators and professional leaders. The framework describes a set of intrinsic capabilities required by practices to lead service change rapidly, safely and sustainably, and a set of enablers which can be used by policymakers and commissioners to make change easier and more sustainable. Since April 2014, we have had the opportunity to use this framework in support of 1100 GP practices across England in the Prime Minister’s Challenge Fund. As these 20 groups of practices have introduced a range of service innovations, they have received a bespoke programme of capability-building and direct access to national support for key enablers. Feedback from practices and leaders has been very positive, with many examples of faster and better progress being made as a result of it. NHS England are now considering ways in which this framework can be used to secure support for other national initiatives, for example further extension of access improvements, support to workforce innovators and a programme to release capacity through reducing workload and working differently.
- One of the tasks of the Call to Action was to identify the actions necessary to promote, support and sustain the adoption of the kind of innovation and improvements we seek. We consulted with practice managers, clinicians, commissioners, policy makers and improvement experts, as well as drawing on the experience of building primary care improvement capability in the UK and internationally. A comprehensive list of areas emerged from this process. This has been tested and refined through ongoing consultation with innovators and professional leaders. The framework describes a set of intrinsic capabilities required by practices to lead service change rapidly, safely and sustainably, and a set of enablers which can be used by policymakers and commissioners to make change easier and more sustainable. Since April 2014, we have had the opportunity to use this framework in support of 1100 GP practices across England in the Prime Minister’s Challenge Fund. As these 20 groups of practices have introduced a range of service innovations, they have received a bespoke programme of capability-building and direct access to national support for key enablers. Feedback from practices and leaders has been very positive, with many examples of faster and better progress being made as a result of it. NHS England are now considering ways in which this framework can be used to secure support for other national initiatives, for example further extension of access improvements, support to workforce innovators and a programme to release capacity through reducing workload and working differently.
- At an organisational level, what will wider primary care at scale look like? Again, the precise details should be locally determined. But we should aim for it to be bigger, in a way that brings real patient to patients and staff, not just creating a new organisation because it makes us feel safer. Our new networks, federations or mergers should have enhanced capabilities, for leadership, management, services and improvement. We also need to ensure that, as we operate at large scale, we maintain the personal care which is so hugely important for many patients (and staff). That will take deliberate design: it won’t just happen. Finally, it should like it’s ‘yours’ – by which I mean that staff will need to have the same sense of belonging, ownership and commitment as in the best practices now. Regardless of the actual business model. That, too, will take planning and skill.