Opposing Viewpoints Essay

Media Violence Opposing Viewpoints
Media violence's history began in the 1950s when television became a mainstream media; TV
networks sought a simple successful formula to increase their revenues. In present day "an
average of 150 acts of violence and about 15 murders entertain us and our children every week, and
that does not count cartoons and news" (Gerber, G. 1996). The average American child has viewed
at least 40,000 murders and 200,000 violent acts, according to the research of TV–Turnoff Network
research. The excess of violence on TV and the video game industry accompanied by the absence of
parental love and involvement creates a dissident reality that can only increase the level of
aggressiveness in children. Violent media content can also discourage creativity and...show more
content...
Television is also consorting children as a common way of solving problems and grant the
message that there is many people who deserve violent treatment. There have been experiments
done by George Gerbner that lead to the conclusion that adults who watch violent films daily are
not bothered by them after a while. One example of this could be doctors, when doctors first start
their career certain cases disturb them, but after a while they are no longer surprised or bothered by
most
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Three Opposing Viewpoints on Abortion Essay
Three Opposing Viewpoints on Abortion
Abortion has been an issue of heated debate in the United States for numerous years. Legislation
has ruled it legal to perform an abortion on any gestational age of an embryo or fetus. Some people
agree with the law and consider themselves pro–choice. Others are completely against abortion and
are pro–life. In addition to these two groups is another group who support abortion in the first half of
pregnancy, but believe abortion should be banned for the second half.
Pro–Choice
Those who agree with the laws on abortion are strong supporters of the woman's right to choose.
Hence, they call themselves pro–choice advocates. These persons are in support of abortions no
matter...show more content...
This group of people also believes that pregnant women have the right to refuse to use their bodies
for the growth of something they do not want. They see unwanted pregnancies as invasions of a
woman's body.
Pro–Life
Those against abortion believe that it kills an unborn child. They consider themselves to be pro–life
advocates for America's unborn children. These persons suggest that the beginning of human life is
at the instant of fertilization. They see abortion as morally and ethically wrong.
Pro–choice persons view abortion as murder. They view an unborn child as a human with rights to
life. They argue that taking a human life living outside the uterus is considered murder, so killing an
embryo or fetus, an unborn child, is also murder.
Pro–life advocates also argue that abortions are being used for unsettling reasons. People are
choosing to have abortions when they discover that their unborn child is not "perfect." The embryo
or fetus may be the wrong sex, or have some form of a birth defect. They also view abortions as an
unacceptable form of birth control. Many women are not getting one abortion because of an
unwanted pregnancy, but two, three, and sometimes even more.
Late–Term Abortions
A third group of people involved in the abortion debate are pro–choice for the first half of pregnancy,
but

Essay on Opposing Viewpoints: Abortion
Appendix E Critical Analysis Forms Fill out one form for each source. Source 1 The "Necessary
Evil" Argument Does Not Justify Abortion Forsythe, Clarke D. "The 'Necessary Evil' Argument
Does Not Justify Abortion." Opposing Viewpoints: Abortion. Ed. Mary E. Williams. San Diego:
Greenhaven Press, 2002. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Apollo Library–Univ of
Phoenix. 9 Jan. 2010 . 1Identify the principal issue presented by the source.The myths behind
"Necessary Evil" of abortions and how referring to these abortions as "necessary evils" attempts to
put minds at ease from a moral standpoint. 2Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If
none exist, explain how you determined this.I believe no bias...show more content...
Ed. Emma Bernay. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale.
Apollo Library–Univ of Phoenix. 9 Jan. 2010 . 1Identify the principal issue presented by the
source.Arguing against Partial Birth Abortions and the ethics behind it, whether or not the
babies feel pain and if its truly murder 2Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If
none exist, explain how you determined this.There is definite bias in this article. The author
definitely states his side by clearly stating how the partial births take place and his views on it.
3Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.I
found no areas vague but I had a hard time reading this so absolutely nothing appeared vague to
me. All arguments seem to be very clearly and strongly presented. 4Do you find the source
credible? Explain your reasoning.Yes I find it credible. Rich Deem, the author has worked in basic
science research for years and is currently working at Cedars–Sinai MC as a researcher/specialist;
therefore, he has the experience and documents statistics and credible sources. 5Identify and name
any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.Using the
word "gruesome" plus the way he discussed the procedure I believe is rhetorical. 6Identify and
name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain

Machiavelli led us to a question that was continuously in disagreement. That question was "Is it
better to be loved than feared, or vice versa" (p.392)? Machiavelli thought that one is to be loved
& feared. Nevertheless, at the same time it's tremendously hard to achieve being both loved &
feared. Machiavelli believed that if one had to do without one of them that it would be a safer to be
feared than to be loved. For example if a ruler was more loved than feared then if you served their
men's interest & were also devoted to them they would promise you their blood, possessions, lives,
& children until you needed help because once you needed help you were on our own. If you're
more feared than loved then when you're in trouble your...show more content...
Erasmus believed in many characteristics of a good prince, a living similarity of God, who is at
once good & powerful. The prince has great goodness, which encourages him want to help all; &
his power allows him to do that. A good price must hold the life of each individual person more
cherished than his own. He's to work & strive each & every day & night so that he can be the best
for everyone. He's to give incentives to all 'good' men & he may not seek recompensation. He must
look out for the well–being at great risk to himself. He is to remember that all of his wealth is in
the hands of his nation. He's to always be alert & on watch so that all of his people may sleep
without the fear of being invaded. The prince may not grant vacation to himself because he's to
always devote his life to peace of his country. He must do everything including the whole kit &
caboodle as well as allowing everything that can possibly bring never–ending peace to his country.
In today's world, I would have to say that the perspective of Erasmus is more modern &
contemporary. Just by rereading over all the characteristics that Erasmus as well as Machiavelli
wrote, Erasmus's is more comparable to what a ruler is supposed to be like in today's society. Even
though there are a few things in Machiavelli's story that are comparable to today's rulers in society,
Erasmus had more things that were comparable. It is extremely difficult to say which

Gun Control : Opposing Viewpoints
GUN CONTROL: OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS Introduction and Preliminary Research In a country
where the people own more than 70 million handguns and perhaps one million automatic rifles and
assault weapons, public opinion on gun control is understandably divided. Those opposed to gun
control often cite the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, which appears to
guarantee private citizens the unrestricted right to bear arms; less theoretical arguments include the
practical need for self–defense in a violent society, and the prospect of political tyranny in a society
where only the government possesses weapons. Finally, the sporting rights of hunters and target
shooters are said to be threatened by calls for registration of rifles and...show more content...
Although numerous advocacy groups have emerged on both sides of the issues, the battles lines are
most clearly drawn between the pro–gun National Rifle Association (NRA) and the gun–control
groups comprised of the many associations of police officers and chiefs (POAs). The National
Rifle Association, with over 3 million members nationwide and a large office building prominently
located near the Capitol building in Washington, D.C., has aggressively fought gun registration and
control for decades, and is said to be the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill beside the government
employees union. The NRA has been able to intimidate politicians by mounting a large single–issue
lobby at election time, but President Clinton has announced his intention to sign the Brady Bill
for tightened gun control, and in March of 1993 actually dared to criticize the NRA for lobbying
against gun control efforts at the local, state and national level ("Clinton Criticizes the NRA,"
1993: 155). On the opposite side of the issue is a wide array of gun control groups, but perhaps the
most significant are the police officer and police chief associations as a whole, which in the last
decade have come out solidly in favor of increased handgun and automatic weapon registration and
restriction. The street war with criminals, and the increasing incidence of mass murder, are finding
America 's police

Opposing Viewpoints
There is no doubt that people's viewpoints has played a pivotal role in all societies. The desire for
express the opinion lies deep within the human sprite. No one can deny direct and indirect influence
of viewpoint on relationships between people in whole society. However, this issue has recently
engendered many controversies among academicians. Some people may hold this viewpoint that if
we can't say anything nice about someone, then we should not say anything about this person.
However, others have an opposite perspective and believe that we should say both nice and bad
things about other people. Nevertheless, many remain neutral, sharing the view that a myriad of
factors should be taken into consideration so as to be able to prove which belief is closer to the
reality. I am of the opinion that the positive viewpoint about someone seems more valuable for
people than negative viewpoints about them; not only does it make to find and keep strong
relationships, but also it is more impressive. In the following paragraphs, I will try to pinpoint the
most important reasons.
The most significant reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this
issue that people maybe don't like that people talk behind them back. This means that it is an
unpleasant behavior that makes...show more content...
But two things are noteworthy here. One is that the society faces an uncritical thought. Two, this
issue has a negative effects on other branches of society. In my own experience, I have a friend in
university that because of other people said inappropriate things about him, resist to change the bad
behavior. To illustrate, I would like to mention the available statistics about this issue. According to
the results of a study in my country, less than 15 present of people resist changing the bad behavior
due to others said anything bad about

Do You Agree With Opposing Viewpoints
Dudley Field Malone once said, "I have never in my life learned anything from a man who agreed
with me." Many people believe that disagreement creates an increase in stress levels which
prevents learning. Disagreements take place every day, and are a vital process in the development
of our own thoughts and opinions. Learning how to disagree with others respectfully will lead us
to stretch our thinking. Explaining opposing standpoints with others gives perspective on the
contrasting positions. Some people say that we learn more from those we share our opinions with,
when in fact people with opposing views help expand our knowledge by providing a different
perspective. In the event that, sharing opposing positions about a subject and having each person
defend their viewpoints leads to knowledge about the opposing sides. I've experienced times when I
listen to someone talking about the conflicting side of an argument, and it causes me to change my
opinion. If you are able to listen to opposite standpoints on a topic and respectful accept their
positon, you will gain a new perspective. When discussing an argument with someone, you typically
will find blind spots that will...show more content...
Once a protest is made against our perspective, we feel challenged to provide factual evidence and
logical reasoning to influence others that we are right. Character plays a big role in this because
wanting to be right is a normal human reaction. Ego drives us to find out more so we have
evidence to support our ideas, and prove that our way of thinking is the right way. Going into a
debate with an open mind to the contrasting argument should be taken into consideration. Every
person has their own experiences and theories to share that can enrich your knowledge. Learning is
being encouraged by those who disagree with our stance on a subject because, we are being exposed
to new philosophies and

Food Safety Opposing Viewpoints
Opposing view point online collection in the article "Food Safety" explains that food safety is an
issue that very few people think about until they become sick. Opposing viewpoints online
collection supports their explanation by giving statistics on the amount of people that get sick
each year along with the different types of foodborne illnesses there are. The author's purpose is
to show the dangers of foodborne illnesses by estimating that "40 million people experience
foodborne diseases every year. In order to eliminate foodborne illnesses they must set a certain
food standard. The author establishes a formal tone for the reader. This work is significant because
it informs the readers what we need to do for solve the food safety issues

Gun Control: The Opposing Viewpoints Essay
U.S congress woman Gabrielle Giffords was shot in the head. This happened in Arizona, a state
where guns are allowed in open carry meaning everyone has option to carry a gun as long as it is
not concealed. When this congress woman was shot, the shooter became enraged. After shooting 3
more people his gun got jammed, this is when a civilian jumped him and stopped his irrational
behavior. This brings up many different opinions on whether guns should be allowed or taken away.
John Luik author of the article "The Increased Availability of Guns ReducesCrime" and Sabina
Thaler the author of the article "The Claim of Increased Gun Availability Reduces Crime is
Unfounded" are two examples of people having different opinions on such a debatable...show more
content...
These statistics also help advocate that guns can be a big protection for innocent people. Pro– gun
believers will say that criminals will always have guns, so if innocent people have them as well, it
is less likely for innocent people to be hurt.
One strong point for gun owners is the shootings in schools against numerous victims. One shooting
was in Pearl, Miss., and another in Edinboro, Pa. Each of those states is allowed open carry. In both
of those shootings, the killer came to a halt because citizens had guns. If citizens didn't have guns
more killers could have continued to murder people because they would have had no way to protect
themselves. These gun supporters will be the firsts to say that because those people had guns, those
killings didn't become mass murders.
On the opposing side, some others may say that the equation of more guns equals less crime is
absolutely absurd. Sabina Thaler the author against guns states "crime victims uniformly use guns in
self–defense is false. Women, for example, are less likely to use guns to protect themselves and are
in fact in greater danger when doing so." This statistic will help show that even if you have a gun to
protect yourself, you might put

Opposing Views On Abortion Essay
The issue of abortion is very complex since it raises many issues. People not only have to
consider the legal aspect of abortion, but also its medical, ethical, social, biological, and religious
aspects, which are still widely debated. First of all, when considering abortion, it is imperative to
make sure the mother is safe, which is why people advocate medical procedures over surgical
procedures due to the former having less health risks. The drug mifepristone is highly effective and
is commonly used to block the production of the hormone that is responsible for proper fetal
development and is usually used up to sixty–three days after the beginning of the last menstrual
period. In regards to ethical issues, there are the two extremes, the pro–life supporters and the
pro–choice supporters, and the individuals with various moderate views justifying abortion
depending on the status of the fetus, the rights of both the woman and the fetus,...show more content...
Social issues that are discussed in the issue of abortion are the effects of abortion on society and
the ideas of social justice and equality. Supporters of abortion claim that a ban on abortion has
serious negative effects on the poor. More than two hundred thousand women die annually in
developing nations as a result of illegal abortions because they could not afford or access abortion
services. Furthermore, if woman delivers the child because she did not have access to services that
terminated her unwanted pregnancy, that child may be abandoned, which poses more problems for
children and society. To counter this, abortion advocates proposed that every woman, regardless of
status, should have equal access to basic services. Restrictions of abortion deny poor, less–educated
women equal access to these facilities, which increases their risk of performing illegal abortions or
having unwanted children that they cannot provide for

As with most hotly–debated issues, there are reasonable points from both sides of the arguments
in favor of and against the vaccination of children. To those who are in favor of vaccinating
children, vaccinations are seen as a means of protection against some highly contagious and
possibly deadly diseases. To those on the other side of the argument, vaccinations are generally
seen as ineffective in protection, as well as a possible source of autism and other disorders. This
paper will present and analyze both sides of this argument in an attempt to inform the reader on the
opposing viewpoints of the vaccination of children. The first viewpoint this paper will examine is
that of those in favor of vaccinating children. Firstly, vaccinations have the ability to protect children
from diseases such as Hepatitis B, Measles, Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Polio, Influenza, and
Tuberculosis, as well as an assortment of others. The driving force behind most pro–vaccine
individuals is the protection of their children. When parents choose not to give their children
vaccinations, it increases the chance of an outbreak of any of the above mentioned diseases. Without
the implementation of vaccines, many of these easily–preventable diseases become possible
epidemics."Vaccines are only given to children after a long and careful review by scientists,
doctors, and healthcare professionals" (Vaccines). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
or CDC, works alongside public and private

Running head: Opposing Viewpoints
1
Opposing Viewpoints of Foucault and Rayner Analyzed through Ethos, Logos, and
Pathos
Jarod Kane
October 10th, 2016
Radford University
Opposing Viewpoints 2
Whether we like it or not the society that currently exists is Panoptic, with cameras on every street
corner or even just the constant surveillance of the internet we are always being watched and have
lost our privacy in lieu of our own safety. Panopticism, the idea that someone is always being
watched and thus they alter their actions to please those watching. It is very clear that Panopticism
does shape an individual 's actions, whether that be for better or worse.
Foucault, on one hand, believes that this motif turns that individual into a labeless subject being
disciplined by a machine like system. However, Rayner argues that a Panoptic society actually helps
the subject mold their image in the public eye. I will be analyzing how Foucault and
Rayner use Ethos, Logos, and Pathos rhetorically to clarify their argument in this Opposing
Viewpoints Essay.
Ethos is a rhetorical appeal used to grab the attention of the audience's morals or ethics.
Foucault in a few short words does not like the implementation of the panopticon or the idea of
panopticism. He believes that it takes away one 's individuality from fear of societal backlash.
"Hence the major effect of the Panopticon: to induce in the inmate a state of conscious and
permanent visibility that assures the automatic functioning of

Essay about Opposing Viewpoints on Depression
As Descartes argued, the mind and the body are the base of our existence, and many different
cultures view different illnesses positively or negatively. Certain cultures, like the Hmong, believe
that epilepsy is a good spiritual thing, but others, such as Western culture, believe that it is
medically bad because it could cause death. Many illnesses can be viewed both negatively and
positively, some more than others. However, one such illness that is mostly viewed negatively is
depression. It is viewed negatively in a symptomatic sense – the symptoms are useless – and in a
diagnostic sense – those diagnosed with depression are not actually depressed and the illness itself
does not exist; it is simply an excuse to be lazy. There are many...show more content...
In addition, depression is extremely stigmatized. Depression is often seen as a lack of effort, a cry
for attention, or simply laziness. This stigmatization causes a lot of people with depression to ignore
the symptoms – some of which include the inability to focus, an unexplainable sadness, or a very
large difficulty in doing things, including simply getting out of bed. Another important aspect to
note is that most people have felt this way at some point in their lives, perhaps after a traumatic
event or simply a stressful day. Those with depression experience it for longer periods of time, and
the fact that others have experienced it causes those with depression to believe that their illness is
not really there, simply a prolongation of the symptoms of others. Many cultures have different
views on depression – some, like Eastern European cultures, tend to believe that depression is not a
real thing; others, like Western cultures, actually tend to over diagnose depression– and throughout
history, people have had different ideas of the reasons for depression. Because depression is
portrayed so vastly differently across the globe and in different humans, there are different
approaches to the causes for this mood disorder. Unlike a flu, for example, that has specific visible
symptoms, such as a fever, vomiting, and feeling exhausted, depression essentially does not have any
visible symptoms that

"Introduction to Sexual Assault on Campus: Opposing Viewpoints." Sexual Assault on Campus.
Ed. Jack Lasky. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2016. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing
Viewpoints in Context. Web. 17 Oct. 2016. The article introduces sexual assault to readers as a
problem that is in line with other forms of violence such as domestic violence, dating violence and
stalking. It gives a figure of 19% undergraduate women who have reported a complete or attempted
sexual assault while in campus and worth noting is that in most of the incidences, the victims knew
the perpetrators, who also feature in other related crimes. In the article, high sexual prime of the
hundreds youth on campus together with alcohol and other drugs are blamed for these heinous acts
and it has thus become an "accepted" cultural norm. Sexual assault, which the article defines as a
forceful compellation of someone to engage in unwanted sexual activities with another, and it can
range from kissing to penetration, is on the rampant increase and hence raising nationwide
concerns. These concerns and opinions, however, divide the nation along political, gender, civic,
and cultural lines. Meanwhile no exact factors have been linked to the rising cases of sexual
assault on campus even though alcohol, male college sexuality and age have proven to be a factor.
On this, divisive positions also emerge but no one seems to answer the question why it is so
frequent and rampant in nearly all college campuses.

Death Penalty Opposing Viewpoints
Johansen, Jay. "The Death Penalty Deters Crime." The Death Penalty. Ed. Mary E. Williams. San
Diego: Greenhaven, 2002. N. pag. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 15
Nov. 2016. In this article, the author examines the crime rates when it comes having the death
penalty. The information I want to include is the dates of when crime decreased when the death
penalty came in, in order to refute it. This article is different from the article I will be using to
refute this, for it does have data compared to this article.

Opposing Views On Climate Change
The climate change is overall change, which has taken place in global climate pattern due to
increase of carbon dioxide in many folds. Whether it is responsibility of individual or the
government to control the climate change has become a moot point for many years. Proponents and
opponents of both the views have their own strong arguments. Before coming to an end, I would like
to light on both the views in my imminent paragraphs.
To put the wheel in motion, the people who strongly advocate the view believes that main cause of
climate change is due to pollution of factories, industries and public transport and government is
getting the huge revenue in the shape of different type of taxes. So, it is moral duty our government
to take the responsibility

Alexander Hamilton Opposing Viewpoints
Over time, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton have been arguing on their views on how to
run our nation. Their opposing viewpoints resulted in the emergence of two political parties. One
political party was the Federalist, who supported Alexander Hamilton. The second political party was
the Democratic–Republicans, who supported Thomas Jefferson. As a member of the cabinet and a
fellow American, I would support Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist party. I would support
Hamilton because of his view on the economy and foreign policy. To elaborate, I would support the
Federalists because of their perspective on the constitution and government. My opponents may say
that their views on foreign policy, economy, government, and the constitution...show more content...
Hamilton favored a national bank, so all Americans would use the same form of currency.
Likewise, Alexander Hamilton believed in paying back the war debt as soon as possible. He did
this by placing taxes on imported goods called tariffs. Moreover, he believed the United States
economy should be based on large businesses. Due to these ideas, I would support Hamilton because
he was helping the nation raise revenue and pay off the debt. Also, by placing taxes he was
encouraging growth in American businesses. Therefore, Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist
party standpoint of the economy is another reason that supports my

Feminism: Opposing Viewpoints Analysis
Feminism: Opposing Viewpoints is a non–fiction novel that addresses the many contradicting beliefs
in feminism. It looks at the different viewpoints held by different women on some controversial
topics such as the wage gap, the glass ceiling, and Arab feminism. It also addresses the two questions
of
Why is feminism needed?
What is, "White Feminism?" Why is feminism needed? Is it Obsolete? Feminism is not obsolete.
According to Feminism: Opposing Viewpoints "Women hold only 15 percent of seats in Congress
and 14 percent of seats on Fortune 500 boards. On average they still earn less than men" (Fisanick).
Not only is this ridiculous, it's unfortunately unsurprising. The wage gap is commonly cited
whenever discussions of gender and politics come...show more content...
It's a refusal to acknowledge the intersections of race, gender, class, sexuality, etc... White feminism
is a type of feminism that is only there for white, cis, straight, able–bodied, girls. It won't
acknowledge transgender girls, disabled girls, muslims, etc... However, white feminists are not
always white, they can be POC, "white feminist" is just a term coined for a feminist who only
supports white women. Feminism: Opposing Viewpoints broaches the topic of white feminism in
viewpoint five, Arab Feminism Has a Long History Without Western Intervention by talking
about Arab feminism, and how white feminists think women in the Arab world need saving
because they are unable to save themselves. It goes on to say "Therefore, the focus on Arabs
women's issues illustrates the good intentions of American feminism; however my concern is
with the "big sister" manner in which those intentions are manifested. Often, Arab women's
voices are excluded from discussions concerning their own lives, and they are to be "informed"
about feminism, as if it is an ideology exclusive to American women alone" (Fisanick). This is
very important, a majority of the time, when people want to help groups that they feel are
oppressed, they do so in ways that end up with them speaking over the marginalized groups. The
last sentence was crucial as well, because it really illustrates the "big sister approach", and shows
what "white feminism" is. It erases people's voices, and it makes a movement that is supposed to be
for all women for one one group of women

Opposing Views On Abortion
Abortion has been a controversial topic for centuries not only in the United States but also in the
other parts of the world. Politicians always struggle to strike a balance between the rights of the
unborn and the rights of the pregnant woman. In my own point of view, abortion is morally
justifiable on the basis of health such as: (1) If the pregnancy is a result of a crime such as rape,
abuse, or incest, (2) if the pregnancy put the mother's life in peril, (3) if the fetus would have a
serious genetic problem. I opposed abortion when the reasons include: primarily for gender
selection, second, for social reasons such as poverty or if the mother is unable to care for the child
(being pregnant at an early age). I believe that there are support

Opposing Viewpoints In Schools
Held Back: A look at American Schooling
Knowledge is arguably the World's most valuable resource; without it the human race would be in
the darkness, surrounded by predators and savages. However, the Human race has never been keen
to have its final moments in the dark. Humans produced fire, managed to capture it in glass, built
cities fueled by it and have fought wars over the right to stand in its light. With that in mind, the
education of all Humans is not a task to be taken lightly. The United States has set up countless
systems, facilities, and programs: billions of dollars spent on the ideals of learning and progress.
So why is one of the World's superpowers lagging behind when it comes to this aspect, especially
when it comes to Primary,...show more content...
Schools Really Falling Behind China?" All Things Considered 26 Jan. 2011: n. pag. Opposing
Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Apr. 2017.
Brady, Diane. "Reinventing School: George Bush Pledges Better Education." Maclean's 29 Apr.
1991: 50. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Apr. 2017.
Enderlin–Lampe, Scherie. "Shared Decision Making in Schools: Effect on Teacher Efficacy."
Education 118.1 (1997): 150. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Apr. 2017.
Fiske, Edward B. "STUDY, DRAWING LESSONS FOR U.S., CITES RIGOR OF JAPANESE
SCHOOLING." The New York Times 4 Jan. 1987: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7
Apr. 2017.
Mathews, Jay. "We're Not Satisfied with Our Schools, and That's Good for Our Education." The
Washington Post 10 June 2013: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Apr. 2017.
"Top Silicon Valley High Schools Respond To Rising Suicide Rate." All Things Considered 17 Nov.
2015: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Apr. 2017.
Toppo, Greg. "Kids Today? They're Not That Different from Kids of Yesterday." USA Today 22
July 2008: 05D. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Apr. 2017.
Traiger, Jerome. "Lessons from the Japanese: Adapt Don't Adopt." Education 116.3 (1996): 441.
Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Apr.

Opposing Viewpoints Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Online Paper Writing Services Haynes

More from Online Paper Writing Services Haynes (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Opposing Viewpoints Essay