Foreign Policy Essay

Canadian Foreign Policy Essay
Canadian Foreign Policy
Introduction
As the 20th century comes to an end, Canada is a transcontinental nation whose interests and
representatives span the face of the globe and extend into every sphere of human behaviour.
However this was not always the case. When the four colonies of British North America united to
create Canada on July 1, 1867, the new country's future was by no means secure. Canada was a
small country, with unsettled borders, vast empty spaces, and a large powerful neighbour, theUnited
States. Confronting these challenges was difficult for the young country. Though Canada was
independent in domestic matters, Britain retained control over its foreign policy. Over the next fifty
or so years, Canada's leaders and its...show more content...
Nevertheless the government soon found that even such a prosaic agenda required the beginnings of
a system of Canadian representation abroad, most notably in the mother country. All correspondence
between Ottawa and London passed through the Governor General who was described as "the
human link in the imperial chain."5
It was in the weary war years of Mackenzie King in the 1930's when the development of Canadian
foreign policy started to take shape. Before that period Canada did not have an independent
foreign policy with no international presence whatsoever and Canadian people saw themselves as
part of the British dynasty. The first period in the formulation of Canadian foreign policy was in
fact the 'absence' of policy and it was World War 1 which gave birth to foreign policy. Sixty
thousand Canadians were lost which left Canadians wary of international development especially
when there were very few military objectives. Canada had minimal control over her own troops and
negotiations with the British were a challenge. Our troops were under control of the British and
negotiating with the British was challenging. Looking back, there was almost a sense of absurdity
about WW1. Therefore, Canadians came out of WW1 with a stronger than ever desire for
independence. The Statute of Westminster, 1931, was the last of the Imperial Acts of the Parliament
of Great Britain applicable to all dominions. It granted Canada,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Foreign Public Policy Essays
Foreign Public Policy Analysis
Directions: Choose one specific foreign policy issue in American government and complete a public
policy analysis of how the problem was addressed.
Stage I Agenda Setting: How did this issue arrive on the public policy agenda? Identify specific
linkage institutions and describe their roles and influence in placing this issue on the policy agenda.
The Ebola virus was first discovered in the year 1976 in Africa. Since then, there have been
countless outbreaks of this virus documented in several different countries across Africa. The issue
of the Ebola virus first arrived on the public policy agenda in the year of 2014. In march of this year,
there was an outbreak in west Africa.
Stage II Policy Formulation:...show more content...
Any who were at high risk or some risk had to have daily check ups from health officials for a
total of 21 days straight. These policies showed to be very effective at containing the disease and
preventing it from spreading. I would characterize these policies as true reform.
Stage V Policy Change: Based on what you learned in the evaluation of the policy, is it necessary
to revise the policy? Why or why not? In your opinion, what would have to happen for the policy
to change? Basing my analysis on what I've previously learned about the policies, I believe it
would be necessary to constantly check and revise the policies on Ebola. These revisions would
help to make any improvements to the system possible and ensure the highest regulations on safety
for the general public would be set.
Stage VI Policy Termination: Should this public policy be ended? What factors would lead to
termination of this public policy? Who has the most to gain from maintaining the policy and who
has the most to lose?
I do not believe at all that these public policies should be stopped or terminated. These policies were
set in place to keep the deadly virus from west Africa from spreading throughout the United
States. It is solely for the purpose of keeping the general public safe and controlling the epidemic.
© KC Distance Learning
Foreign Policy Summary: Based on the discussion with your

Us Foreign Policy In The 21st Century Essay
During the course of this paper we will examine whether or not U.S. foreign policy in the 21st
century has either, fundamentally changed, or if the U.S. is using the same policies it has been
using for centuries. First we will discover that much is new in the realm of U.S. foreign policy
and lastly we will explore the aspect of globalization. Next we will examine the new approaches
the U.S. has used in the 21st century to address the new issues on foreign policy and how they
have greatly changed, from President Bush's focuses on the use of unilateralism and primacy to
President Obama's separation from Bush's policies and embracing the use of multilateralism and
'smart' power. Finally, while we examine a few resolute aspects of the current global stage we can
then come to the conclusion that while much is new on the world stage in the 21st century, some
aspects of the current foreign policies have remained the same, and will probably stay that way in the
future.
New Actors in the Global Arena
The number of actors who contribute to foreign policy making is increasing in the global arena
and for US foreign policy. The newest actor to be considered is the people. Public opinion plays a
key role in influencing foreign policy. In this day and age, almost everyone in the world has access to
technology which...show more content...
Foreign policy in big government nations is based on the considering of national security,
geopolitics, government administrative and bureaucratic infighting, and defense of allied nations.
Foreign policy in a free nation is based on personal values, personal beliefs, personal self–interest,
peaceful settlement of disputes, and a significant degree of insularity and isolation from the big
government nations of the

The Purpose Of Foreign Policy
In his 1992 book Writing Security, David Campbell writes that foreign policy is subjective and
includes a description of dangers posed by others. Those that create foreign policy choose aspects of
reality and describe them as threats to the state and society. He says that the purpose of national
security strategy is primarily to define and support the state and national identity, which is created by
marking borders between "us" and "the other". Interpreting specific factors and groups in terms of
threat reinforces citizens' feelings of identity, belonging, and solidarity.
In Campbell's view, U.S. Vietnam veterans were made "other", by politicians and society. The image
that showed them as drug abusers enabled them to be identified as potential

Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy
Although the aspirations and goals of states are often motivated by external political pressures,
analysis of recent foreign policy decisions demonstrates how internal political forces can play
equally crucial roles in the pursuit and execution of these objectives. Thus, it would be invalid to
claim that domestic politics and the nature of regimes play minor roles in either the goals a state
pursues or the means it employs to reach them. By understanding how the diffusion of power in
governments affect policy decisions, one can develop increased awareness of the linkages that exist
between the internal pressures of domestic politics and the external forces of foreign politics.
Before discussing...show more content...
As the commander in chief, the president plays a significant role in shaping foreign policy. The
president possesses the power to appoint senior cabinet members, commit troops and conduct high
level talks with foreign governments. Congress, on the other hand, has the power to ratify treaties,
confirm the president's appointees and approve budgetary measures. And while the president has the
ability to commit troops, only Congress has the authority to declare war. Despite criticisms of the
American policy making process describing it as inefficient and slow moving, the main purpose and
thus benefit of the constitutional separation of power is the framework of checks and balances that
safeguard against monopolization of foreign policy decision making.
But despite the provisions outlined in the Constitution outlining the separation of power between the
executive and legislative branch in the formulation of foreign policy, congressional influence over
foreign policy decisions waned after World War II. During the Vietnam War, the Johnson and Nixon
administrations became increasingly secretive and monopolized foreign policy decision authority.
Ultimately, however, the growing imbalance of influence of the executive branch in foreign policy
decisions led to the creation of the War Powers Act. The Act stipulated that the president was
required to report to Congress within 48 hours after the

Foreign Policy Essay
Policemen of the World Thesis and Outline
Janene Bull
Professor Joel A. Goldstein
Contemporary US History
2/22/2015
The evolution of U.S. Foreign policy following the Civil War is continually evolving. During the
Civil War years, America had an economy that was based on agriculture. Farmers were growing
cotton, tobacco and sugarcane. Slaves from Africa worked on these enormous plantations. . At the
time, America was in an election year with Lincoln as the candidate of the Republican Party
claiming he was going to abolish slavery. When Lincoln won the election he did just that,
immediately there after 7 states declared their independence from the US, they were then known as
Confederate States. After a few years 4 more states...show more content...
References www.historyboss.com www.foreignpolicy.com www.huffingtonpost.com Results:100%
Unique Content continually evolving. During the Civil War years, America had
Good
on agriculture. Farmers were growing cotton, tobacco and
Good
and sugarcane. Slaves from Africa worked on these enormous
Good
enormous plantations. . At the time, America was in an election
Good
abolish slavery. When Lincoln won the election he did just
Good
did just that, immediately there after 7 states declared
Good
independence from the US, they were then known as Confederate States.
Good
Confederate States. After a few years 4 more states also joined
Good
international relations. During the past 5 years there have been
Good

the Civil War. For example, Issues Regarding Guantanamo
Good
Amendment of 1901), and the attempt to Stop the Soviet Expansion
Good
policing roll, and has acted as an enforcer of global rules.
Good
global rules. When there is a threat to world peace the
Good
world peace the U.S will respond. Three instances where America
Good
Industrial Revolution, the Treaty of Paris and, The Cold War.
Good
Military Justice, and the four Geneva Conventions. The driving
Good
Geneva Conventions. The driving forces involved in stopping
Good
How the Plagiarism Check Tool Works:
The article you

Purpose Of Foreign Policy
At first glance, the basic values of US foreign policy seem confusing and very difficult to figure
out. The main purpose of Foreign Policy is to solve international problems and prevent military
action as much as possible. At first its purpose was to protect their commercial interests because our
military was week. After WWI, United States were helping the countries who were not financially
able to take care of themselves. They were saving money and selling their products that later when
WW2 occurs, they can be ready. The 20th century was marked by two world wars in which the
United States, along with Allied powers, defeated its enemies and increased its international
reputation. The United States followed an independent course, and

Us Foreign Policy Essay
Why is US foreign policy pulled to extreme of either doing too much or nothing at all?
The inability of U.S. foreign policy to stay effective is because America has committed itself to
supporting alliances that have not proven to be mutually beneficial. Foreign assistance, which is
supposed to improve the well–being of recipient countries, goes directly to small coalitions. The
United States, with the fear of losing its position on the global stage, has committed itself to the
conundrum of regime change which often produces little result. Countries receiving foreign aid and
military assistance have no incentives to build an effective bureaucracy or judicial system because
these systems can represent threats to incumbents based upon local...show more content...
On the other hand, U.S. foreign policy was pulled to do nothing good to social improvements. The
ultimate goal for U.S. foreign policy is to promote democracy in recipient countries. However, this
goal has failed several times. For example, America was too deeply trapped into the commitment to
see the real problems of South Vietnam. According to Hilton Root, the South Vietnam government's
deepest vulnerability was its failure to win the confidence of the peasantry. Like Chiang Kai–shek's
loss of China, both the Diem and Thieu regimes failed to gain popular support from the rural
population. Without clearly seeing the needs of the rural population, America's effort to support
South Vietnam and import democracy to this country failed with the collapse of the South
Vietnamese government. Furthermore, social conditions of South Vietnam were not mature enough
for accepting democratic style social reforms. According to Hilton Root, there was no cultural
heritage in Vietnam that can link the individual rights to the cultural legacy of the nationhood.
Unlike the French and American social systems, which rest secure on social contract, the Vietnamese
had no social contract and Vietnamese social identity stemmed from loyalty to family or village
rather than to the nationhood. The lack of both social

Domestic and Foreign Policies Essay
Domestic and Foreign Policies Throughout our history, many policies have been made to deal
with domestic or foreign issues or conflicts. One example of domestic policies were the reforms
FDR created called the New Deal. An example of a foreign policy was that of containment used
after WW2. In the 1930's our country and many others around the world went through a financial
depression. The Depression was mostly attributed to the stock market crash in 1929. President
Hoover who served before FDR tried numerous things to try and help cure the depression. But by
the time FDR was elected in, the depression was still very much present. FDR was open to many
different ideas to try and fix the economy....show more content...
FDR was undoubtedly one of the best leaders our country has seen, but it wasn't so easy for him.
Two of the programs Roosevelt instituted were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The
National Recovery Administration enabled codes that called for, or encouraged businesses to agree
upon fair prices. One business complained that these codes were too much like laws. Therefore, the
NRA gave legislative power to the president that he shouldn't have had. The supreme court declared
the administration unconstitutional. A similar case was brought to the supreme court. It said that the
codes that went along with the Agricultural Adjustment Act that had required a tax were also
unconstitutional. In response to the supreme court rulings FDR tried to raise the number of judges
that sit in the supreme court from 9 to 15. He wanted to appoint justices that shared the same views
as his on. The congress didn't approve of the plan. Directly following world war two the United
States and the Soviet Union emerged as the two super powers of the world. Although the two
countries were allies during the war, after the war they were common enemies. The U.S. strongly
apposed the political advances the Soviet Union was making. Directly after World War 2, The Soviet
Union was quickly supporting communist revolutions within the nations of Eastern

John F Kennedy Foreign Policy Essay
Once every four years American citizens who are at least 18 years or older to vote for Presidents
of the United State. The candidate who receives the most Electoral College vote wins. A president
cannot serve more than two terms or eight years. President John F. Kennedy was elected as the 35th
president of the United States in 1961 ("John F. Kennedy"). According to the White House
biography, "John F. Kennedy", Based upon his civil right, health care, and foreign John F. Kennedy
was a successful president.
Importantly, President John F. Kennedy policy on foreign helped make a great president. According
to Bureau of Public Affair, "Kennedy's foreign Policy", Kennedy's formed alliance with Latin
America to help poor women and man that suffer from hunger and poverty. The United State hoped
that Latin America will make the countries stronger. Next, Kennedy's began American involvement
with Vietnam. He's getting involved because he received conflict advice from Vietnam. South
Vietnam had a war about the Geneva Accord into Communist North Vietnam but not south.
Kennedy's goal is to containing communism so he supported South Vietnam and expand the military.
And then American war in Vietnam was over because North Vietnam captured the capital city of
Saigon. Now one of Kennedy's important foreign policy...show more content...
John F. Kennedy provided health insurance for poor people based on "John F. Kennedy on health
care". Also, Kennedy's attempt to create retirement base Medicare. He's providing health insurance
for elderly by let them use social security benefits. Beside health care Kennedy's had Addison
disease which can cause him to gain more weight or some illness. But there's a new drug called
cortisone that can help with Addison disease. Kennedy's used the drug and it's like a "miracle drug"
which can change your whole life. Cortisone made Kennedy's have normal weight from that time

World War I Foreign Policy Essay
Foreign Policy is our government's strategy for dealing with other nations. Throughout this paper I
will be talking about different examples of foreign policy and how our nation deals with other
nations.The development of foreign policy is influenced by domestic considerations, the policies or
behaviours of other states, oe plans to advance specific geopolitical designs. A foreignpolicy should
protect the integrity of the country and the interests of its citizens. The foreign policy of a country
should promote its national interests of the country. Foreign policy should also promote economic
interests of the country. Foreign policy has long–lasting consequences. Some of the people making
decisions on foreign policy won't live long enough...show more content...
World War I was started when Archduke Franz Ferdinand ,heir to the Austro
–Hungarian Empire, was
assassinated. Austria–Hungary declared war on Serbia and the peace between Europe's great
powers fell quickly. Germany invaded belgium in the first battle of World War I assaulting the
city Leige and captured the city in eleven days (History.com Staff). During the siege they shot
civilians and executed a belgian priest. They went through Belgium and advanced toward France.
French and British forces drove the Germans back after they made it within thirty miles of Paris.
The defeat meant the end of German plans for a fast victory in France. Russian forces attacked
the German held portions of East Prussia and Poland. Russian forces were stopped by Germany
and Austria in August, 1914 (History.com Staff). America stayed out of World War I with the
policy of neutrality which was favored by president Woodrow Wilson. The cause of America
joining World War I and declaring war on germany was the sinking of U.S. merchant ships. "At the
Paris Peace Conference in 1919, Allied leaders would state their desire to build a post–war world
that would safeguard itself against future conflicts of such devastating scale"(History.com Staff).
Some participants called World War I the War to End All Wars. The Treaty of Versailles gave
Germany heavy reparations and they were also denied entrance to the League of Nations.
Germany felt tricked into signing the treaty. Hatred of the Versailles treaty as years passed settled
into a smoldering resentment in Germany which was one of the causes of World War II two
decades later. World War II involved more than thirty countries and resulted in more than fifty
million military and civilian deaths (History.com Staff). The war started when germany invaded
Poland and went on for six years. What allowed Hitler to invade Poland was when he signed a
nonaggression pact with soviet leader Joseph Stalin so

National Security in Foreign Policy
Foreign policy definition: a set of political goals that aims to outline how a particular state will
interact with others
Beach (2012): Foreign policy actions can be undertaken using a variety of different instruments,
ranging from adopting declarations, making speeches, negotiating treaties, giving other states
economic aid, engaging in diplomatic activity such as summits, and the use of military force
No matter which instruments are used, the primary objective of states in outlining their foreign
policies is to maximise their national security.
States can go about maximising national security through different means such as by military force,
economic prosperity and/or the general welfare of its people.
Difficult to analyse to what extent national security is a primary objective of states – theories of IR
will help explain states' motives and how they go about maximising state security, if it is their prime
objective at all.
This essay will analyse the concept of national security through realism (focused on military power),
liberalism (focused on cooperation through liberal internationalism) and constructivism (focused on
wider definitions of security, such as health and the environment).
A.Realism
1.Core principles of realist view of national security
For realists, the concept of national security is an effective balancing of external threats.
The realist tradition of IR theory is said to have stemmed from the work of Thomas Hobbes, where he

America's Foreign Policy Essay
To begin America's foreign policy has changed quite a lot. The first policy we had was the
Monroe Doctrine which was established in 1823. The policy provided precedent and support for
U.S. expansion on the American continent. This meant Europe could not interfere in Western
Hemisphere affairs and could not be involved in the expansion. Soon after that we were changing
our policies again which lead us to Wilson's 14 points. Basically after we had entered WW1 we
wanted to establish peace so we drew up specific recommendations for a comprehensive peace
settlement. As you can see already we are becoming more involved and our policies are allowing
us to become a whole and make peace. Then once again we were getting involved and our policies
had to changed again we created the United Nations in 1945. It consisted of the following...show
more content...
The United Nations helps established peace and committing to maintain international peace and
security. We at this point we're trying to develop friendly relations to among nations. We were very
involved around the world making sure everything and everybody was at peace. As time went on
we tried to allow the US to expand and get others to join our side. We created the Truman Doctrine.
Which was asking for assistance from Greece and Turkey to forestall communist domination of the
two nations. This then changed our policy to allow the United States to support free people who are
resisting communist efforts to help resolve them. We had thought that if we were being involved
it was going to better us. But that all changed and so did our policies on 9/11. We were attacked
and so we converted military operations, new security legislation, efforts to block the financing of
terrorism. We soon became involved in a different way we focused more on equality and adding
people. We now pay close attention to what everyone is doing to help keep us safe. Which leads us
to the next

Development of Foreign Policy Essay
Prior to the establishment of the United States, which was formed with the end of the American
Revolution, there was no foreign policy for the American new found state. However, this changed
with the formation of the same. The policy then consisted mainly on its regional interests and had no
regards of the international scene. This however came to pass with the advent of the
Spanish–American war. What however ought to be noted is that the regional policy had in its ideals
an aim of creating an 'Empire of Liberty'.
The US had its first taste of having a foreign affairs office through the First Congress in 1789 upon
the creation of the cabinet level Department of Foreign Affairs. This was soon thereafter renamed to
Department of States...show more content...
The address also highlighted foreign policy's role at ensuring that the country steers clear from
association with any portion of the foreign world that had a notion of permanence as well as an
advocacy for trade with all nations.
The State found itself entangled with European Powers severally, most notable once being the War
of 1812 and the 1898 Spanish–American War that earlier had been noted. These entanglements
nevertheless did not deter the growth of the US foreign policy as even with them, its foreign trade
continued to flourish under the helm of the policy. This also ensured that despite the wars in the
European world with which it was in constant contact with, the state did not partake of them. In
furtherance to this, the US made a lot of progress in the same duration. It grew in geographical
coverage and might by great leaps all thanks to the spirit of the foreign affairs.
With the entrant of the 20th Century, the US saw with it its participation in two World Wars, and its
subsequent success not in one but both. This increased its might, reputation and significance in the
shaping and development of the world's politics. This was topped by the Wilsonianism program
which had to its end, the spread of democracy and end of militarism amongst nations (Manela,
2009). The Wilson's initiative saw to its end the formation of the League of Nations upon the end of
the WWI, though the US declined to join.
Between the years 1932 to

Regionalization Introduction An international region can be defined as a number of states linked by
a geographic relationship and by a degree of interdependence. The activities of the neighboring states
have a significant impact on determining foreign policy. Regionalization is helping reshape the
world in a profound way since many countries today are seeking stronger economic ties with their
regional neighbors. Regional subsystems are characterized by clusters of states coexisting in
geographical closeness as interrelated units that sustain significant security, economic, and political
relations. Regionalization can be conceived as the growth of societal integration within a given
region, including the undirected processes of social and economic interaction among the units.
Similarly, the term regionalism refers to the proneness of the governments and peoples of two or
more states to establish voluntary associations and to pool together resources in order to create
common functional and institutional arrangements. Furthermore, regionalism can be best described
as a process occurring in a given geographical region by which different types of actors (states,
regional institutions, societal organizations and other nonstate actors) come to share certain
fundamental values and norms. Regionalization and regionalism find expression in the economic
and security domains, including convergent motivations toward both political/security and economic
forms of integration. India

Mussolini's Foreign Policy Essay
Mussolini's Foreign Policy Mussolini considered foreign policy to be so important that he acted as
his own Foreign Minister. After 1936 he gave it to his son in law Count Ciano. Through him,
Mussolini still retained control. His foreign policy was expansionist and was also used to sort out
domestic problems. Frequently he sought to distract attention from internal problems while at the
same time trying to impress Italians with success abroad. Mussolini tended to be the aggressor
rather than the conciliator, believing it was better to be feared than liked. The main areas of
planned Fascist expansion were to be the Balkans, North Africa and the Mediterranean was to
become an Italian lake. His...show more content...
After WWI Italy longed for peace. Mussolini enjoyed signing peace pacts with foreign countries and
signed 8 pacts between 1926–1930. He wanted Italy to remain a great European power but secretly
hoped that she might one day become a world power. He won acclaim in Italy by signing the
Treaty of Locarno in 192 confirming the Versailles division of Europe and the Kellogg–Briand Pact
in 1928 by which he committed Italy to renounce war as an instrument of policy. For some time,
Mussolini had been casting his eyes towards Africa especially Abyssinia (now Ethiopia). The
Italians invaded Abyssinia in Oct 1935 without first declaring war. By employing aeroplane
bombs, machine guns and poison gas on a large scale, the Italians had little difficulty in
overcoming Abyssinian resistance. But Abyssinia was a League of Nations member and its
emperor, Haile Selaisse, applied for help. Italy was condemned as an aggressor and economic
sanctions were imposed, but were of little use. In May 1936 Marshal Badoglio led the capture of the
Abyssinian capital, Addis Ababa. Mussolini declared the creation of an Italian empire with Victor
Emmanuel III as emperor. However this incident caused the withdrawal of Italy from the league in
1937. A further consequence of the Abyssinian incident was that it drove Mussolini to have closer
ties with Hitler's Germany. Hitler

An Example Of Foreign Policy In The United States
Foreign policy is how one nation deals with many other nations. The book talks about Ronald
Regan trying to create foreign policy and then here you have congress like a bunch of ants
floating on a log down river each ant thinking there in charge. Foreign policy from the way "How
Congress Works'" says is set up by the president and not really. Having congress get involved
makes foreign policy way more complicated then needed. Harry Truman was one man who was
asked a question. A random person wanted to know who created foreign policy? His answer was
that he did. Now this leads to a important example of foreign policy. This leads toJohn F. Kennedy
and we all know what major foreign policy deal he had to deal with. It was the Cuban missile crisis.

U.S. Foreign Policy Essay
Throughout the course of history, the United States has remained consistent with its national interest
by taking many different actions in foreign policy. There have been both immediate and long term
results of these actions. Foreign policy is the United States policy that defines how we deal with
other countries economically and politically. It is made by congress, the president, and the people.
Some of the motivations for United States foreign policy are national security, economics, and
idealism. The United States entry into World War Iin 1917 and the escalation of the Vietnam War in
1964 and the both had great impact on the United States.
A major type of foreign policy in the 1964 was containment. The Vietnam War was fought
...show
more content...
The goals of this foreign policy was to end communism containment while starting democracies. For
the United States, the war ended in the withdrawal of American troops and the failure of its foreign
policy in Vietnam.
Another major foreign policy action was the entry to World War I. On August 4, 1914 there was an
outbreak in Europe. A war started between the central powers and the allied powers. The central
powers consisted of Germany, Austria–Hungry, and the Ottoman Empire. They were also known as
the Triple Alliance. The Allied Powers, also know as the Triple Entente consisted of Britain,
France, and Russia. An immediate cause of the war was the assassination of Archduke Franz
Ferdinand in 1914. Some long term causes that started the war were militarism, alliances,
imperialism, and nationalism. America tried to keep themselves isolated from the war in Europe.
Before the war, America had an idea of neutrality. Neutrality is when American lives and property is
not threatened. There was great ethnic diversity in the United States which led to a public union
about war. The United States also had the idea of freedom of the seas. This meant the routes for
trading were open. The United States had the desire to trade with both the central and the allied
powers. The United States had a great economic interest in the war at this time. There were many
different

Free Essay: Foreign Policy
ESSAY: FOREIGN POLICY
Introduction
Washington and Monroe believed the United States should not become involved in European
affairs, but is that possible to follow today? In my opinion, I believe that European affairs can be
avoided for the most part, but with major wars, it can't be avoided. When there is a major battle in
Europe, there is a danger to the United States. If we don't work to stop the European threat before it
gets to our country, we can be facing major devastation, destruction, and death. One not–so–recent
example of this is World War II. If the United States hadn't joined the Second World War, then
Germany would've eventually invaded our country and would've been harder to stop than it
already was. Because of the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor, December 7th 1941, we joined on
the side of the British against the Japanese, Germans, and Italians, or the Axis powers. With minor
terrorist attacks and other minor European crimes, we can stay out of their business and for the
most part remain neutral in the conflicts on European nations. We need to protect ourselves and our
allies if we wish to keep our freedoms that other countries don't have. It's up to our president to
decide what we need to interfere with, and what we need to stay out of.
I....show more content...
If we as a nation remain neutral in major conflicts in Europe, than we will be endangering
ourselves, and our children to come. One example of why we must become involved with some
European affairs is the terror attacks in Paris in November of 2015. It was the bloodiest attack in
Europe for years. French president Hollande called it an "act of war" by the terrorist group ISIS.
On the night of November 13, 130 people were massacred by bombings and shootings. If that
escalated to a full war with the ISIS, then the United States would be in danger of the same terror
attacks on major cities like New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, or Washington D.

US Foreign Policy Essay
US Foreign policy is what the United States of America does in foreign
countries. This may include setting new rules or even controlling the countries' governments.
What the US does in other countries usually ends up creating a conflict or an uprising in the
region. US foreign policy makes the world very unstable and it causes disagreements between
countries. The Israel Lobby has a great deal of negative influence on US foreign policy. The
US is also very keen to destroy Wahabbist ideas and to exploit countries' resources.
The Israel Lobby causes a lot of instability and unbalanced power
between countries in the Middle East. The Israel Lobby is the term used to describe the group...show
more content...
AIPAC pressured congresswomen Betty
McCollum when she decided not to agree on a law passed to support Israel. They used press
and the media to make her accept this law so they could get what they wanted for Israel. Israel
is stopping nationalism in the Middle East so it can get control of the oil reserves. The US
supports this fully since they're going to take their share of the oil. This is another example of
how the Israel Lobby influences what the US does in other countries. The Israel Lobby has a
a lot influence on the US and the US foreign policy in the Middle East is based on Israel's
interest. These interests are achieved by violence and wars and this is how the US foreign
policy creates conflict in the Middle East.
The US has the goal to eliminate Wahhabist ideas which cause the
Wahhabists to fight even more for their religion and ideas, causing conflict in the area.
Wahhabism is a conservative form ofIslam which is practiced in Saudi Arabia. Wahhabists

believe in the unity of God and they follow the Sharia law. The Wahhabist ideology was
spread to Afghanistan and Pakistan where this group of people called the Talibans started to
follow the Wahhabist ideas. The US considered the Talibans to be terrorists and they wanted
to destroy them. US tried many things to stop the

Foreign Policy Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Online Paper Writing Services Haynes

More from Online Paper Writing Services Haynes (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Foreign Policy Essay