Does God Exist Philosophy Essay

Does God Exist? Essay
Does God exist?
The question of God's existence is a perplexing one, the only evidence we have of God is what we
are told from those who worship him, and unknowns can be debated logically if a higher being is in
control.
It has been written that in the beginning there was man and there was woman, and God put the two
together to create a new race of beings. We are to assume then that God gave these beings asoul to
distinguish them from other beings, for example, plants. The soul is often argued to be a mystical
form that is immortal and can not be proven to be anything else.
Assuming this argument to be valid then God is a supreme being to have created humans. We have
several high beings that appear to stem from this one divine being,...show more content...
This leads to the argument for a heaven and a hell, an afterlife for the immortal soul to move onto.
Plato's cosmology dictates the Notion of Purity in the structure of the universe, going as far to say
that the Earth is round and beyond the stars and planets is a World of Being.
His reasoning is what is pure will rise above the earth, and what is non–pure will slip from it. People
of faith take this concept and say there must be a supreme being governing this process, thus God
must exist. It is Socrates metaphysics that leads us to two worlds, one of becoming, the other of
being. In the World of Becoming the body is most like the seen, and in the World of Being the
body is of the unseen, according to Socrates. In the World of Becoming humans are limited by
their body, whereas the World of Being consists of the mind and soul. Socrates believed to
achieve the World of Being one must die to free their soul, and he did this. Believing a true
philosopher is one who wants death he let it happen so that his soul could be free to learn the
truth of the portrait of an ideal form, free of limitations. People of faith would say that this is what
God ultimately did as well. God was a true philosopher who freed his soul. Unfortunately for the
philosophers who accomplish this, we never hear from them again. If there is a God, then he must
be a silent being that is diligent in his work. What we have are reasoning's on an
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

"Is it Possible to Prove the Existence of God?"
There are many arguments that have been brought forward to support or refute the existence of God.
Even in early times, these arguments were there and a number of philosophers argued on the
possibility of God's existence. St. Thomas Aquinas is one of the philosophers who supported the
existence of God. In one of his writings that is referred to as Summa Theologica, he provides five
ways in which God's existence can be proved (Aidan, 2001). I belong to this school of thought
which believes that God does exist. Therefore, this paper seeks to present arguments that prove the
existence of God.
First and foremost, the possibility of God itself implies the existence of God. Maydole (1980) gives
an in–depth analysis of St. Anselm who was of the idea that God could not be a being that is greater
than which the human mind can conceive. Therefore, if there is even a slightest consideration that
God exists, then he does exist. He goes on to assert that there can only be one supreme being in
existence and that the same supreme being cannot be greater that itself. Therefore, this argument
suggests that co–supremity among distinct things is impossible. For that reason, God exists.
The second convincing argument about the existence of God concerns the way in which the world
is governed. Things such as natural bodies do not have a mind of their own and yet they act for an
end. Such ends, seemingly pursues the best results. It cannot be

God Is Real : Is God Real?
RJ Longstreet
Dr. DePoe
PHIL 312
30 November 2015
God is Real The question "Is God real?" has been speculated for years and years. It is one of the
main questions that is still being asked in today's world, with movies, music and media
surrounding it. The popular movies that have recently been released such as "God's Not Dead"
and "Heaven is for Real," are perfect examples of this, with millions going to see them, and
supporting the assumption that there is a God and place called Heaven. Millions of people assert
their faith of God on a daily basis by claiming to pray to him, and doing things in order to bring him
glory; the Bible is a major component that people turn to in order to support their claim that God
is real, and is still apart of our everyday life. However, there is a side that states God is not real and
he will not return. Major arguments for this side would be through certain catastrophic events that
occurred, such as the Boston bombings or the attack on 9/11. The nonbelievers state that if there
was a God he would not put his people through that; and also the argument of evolution, and how
man came to be. As for me, I believe that God is indeed real, because the stories of Jesus told
through the Bible, the amount of people that claim to have first–hand experience of both God and
heaven, how Moses obtained the Ten Commandments at Mount Sinai, and how life events are
interconnected to teach us lessons. Usually, a book or text is a major component that

Bertrand Russell's main arguments against the existence of God and Christianity in general, started
with the definition of a Christian. He gave his opinion on several types of argument for the existence
of God. Such as, the cosmological, the natural law, the teleological, the moral, and the argument for
the remedying of injustice. He then gave his view of the characteristic of Christ, the defects in
Christ's teaching, and how the churches have retarded progress. In the process of reading Bertrand
Russell argument, he has made some valid points, but also made some unsound judgment.
I think Bertrand Russell critique is fair in that a lot of people in today's society has a loose
definition of what a Christian is. A Christian is not just someone that lives a good life. A Christian
should portray a dogmatic nature, and believe in God and immortality. However his argument is
contradictory in the first cause, he first claims that if everything must have a cause, then God must
have a cause. Then he opposes his argument by stating, if there can be anything without a cause, it
may just as well be the world as God. In my opinion this is poor reasoning....show more content...
On the other hand, Bertrand Russell claims that he is not a Christian, but yet he seems to know the
bible more than most professed Christians do. But it has been said, the devil knows the bible just
as good, because he was once an angel in heaven. I have found his critique to be rather convincing,
because it may either stimulate a person to evaluate their beliefs; or it may be an awakening to a
profess Christian, that do not know the word of God, and realizes that an atheist knows more about
the Christian faith than the Christians

Does God Exist
Does God Exist The question of God's existence has lingered in the mind of man since the dawn
of religion. The simple fact that billions of people consider themselves to have some allegiance to
a deity means that this question deserves to be seriously considered. In this paper I will argue for
the sake that God does exist and the reasons why. I will include many of the arguments found in
our philosophy book and those covered in class as well as other subjects such as human suffering
and the reasons God chose to make the world as it is today, also including examples from life and
the movies we watched in class.
St. Thomas Aquinas had many arguments for the existence of God and one of those was the fifth way.
In the argument of the fifth...show more content...
To exist in reality is greater than existing in the mind (idea). Therefore God, being that which nothing
greater can be conceived must exist in reality. All his premises support his conclusion, creating a
valid and sound argument proving that God must exist.
The atheist William Rowe uses an argument called the problem of evil that tries to prove the
nonexistence of God's however I can dismiss said argument. The problem of evil is the argument
that an all–powerful, all–knowing, and perfectly good God would not allow any–or certain kinds
of–evil or suffering to occur. The problem of evil contends that some known fact about evil is
evidence against the existence of God. This objection is typically raised against the Christian faith.
The Bible describes God as a god of love (1 John 4:16) and an all powerful god (Jeremiah 32:17).
The rationale behind this objection is, quite simply, if God is a loving god then he wouldn't want
mankind to suffer and if he is an all powerful god then he would have the means to stop suffering.
Therefore, the rationale follows, God cannot be both loving and all powerful and so the Christian
premise must be wrong. However, this is, in fact, an oversimplification of Christian theology. The
Bible itself acknowledges the existence of suffering and even suggests that suffering brings benefits:
In Romans 8:17 it is said that "We are heirs – heirs of God and co–heirs with Christ, if indeed we
share in his sufferings in order that we may also

Argumentative Essay: Does God Exist?
Perhaps the most important question in life someone can ask there self's is, whether or not god
exists. From the video "Does god exist" Quentin Smith, a graduate of Western Michigan University
says, "All the galaxies were once compacted together, and the big bang theory is when all the matter
in the galaxies just blew apart. And the mystery, according to science laws, is there can be no cause
of this initial explosion." Although there can be countless allegations someone can make to refute
this known fact, I believe, through my experiences, that this is true. Thus, leading me to believe
there is an unimaginable force that contains space that must have been able to expand our universe
into what we see today. "God is at liberty to create, whatever state of the...show more content...
Keith ward, a graduate of Oxford University, describes in the video "Can we know God through
experience?" that when people decide to get into a relationship with god, it is a culture based
practice. He goes on to say "So what they feel is being disclosed is very relative to the culture
they're in." 'According to the Oklevueha EarthWalks proclamation, ceremonies are conducted as a
means of connecting people with their creator, "developing an appreciation for all things on this
earth, and all our relations," and to "facilitate change in [people's] lives." During these ceremonies,
church members say, people with troubled and tortured pasts often become emotional and
confessional, digging difficult memories from the place where they may lie latent within, then
bringing them to light in an attempt to resolve and get beyond them.' (Article by Jared W.
Blackley.2001) In my opinion, that is what Mooney is trying to convey to the courts. He doesn't
want the court to see this as a drug, but a way to experience what it means to be

Does God Exist?
Every culture has its God. Christianity and Islam have their own god; the Romans and Greeks
had their Pantheon. A lot of people believe in god have thought that there is more to life the
material world around us. It seems arises naturally the world over by believing in god. Does God
exist? I believe in God is exists by the philosophical argument: ontological argument, the first cause
argument, the argument form design, and the moral argument. Arguments relate to theexistence of
God are in different forms: some focus on history, some on personal experience, some on
philosophy, and some on science. These arguments are the purported proof of the existence of God.
If successfully, each argument supports a specific and certain conception of God.
Argument I: The design argument for the existence of God. The argument from design is the
teleological argument that focuses on the fact that the universe is ordered. The complex world and
order of nature must be designed by some mind. The mind is God. The key theme of design
argument is that God must exist though the way things work, and God as an intelligent designer
who makes the world be the way it is. God exists from the way things in nature are ordered and
their apparent purpose. Everything appears to have a purpose by happened randomly. Therefore,
God design and order the world by particular way. Anthropic Principle is one of the main elements
for the design argument. This principle considers the universe is

Does God Exist? The Existence Of God?
Does God Exist? The existence of God is a question that has troubled and plagued mankind since
it began to consider logic. Is there a God? How can we be sure that God exists? Can you prove to
me that He is real? Does His existence, or lack thereof, make a significant difference? These loaded
questions strike at the heart of human existence. But the real question is, can we answer any of them?
These questions are answered in the arguments of St. Thomas Aquinas, Blaise Pascal and St.Anselm
of Canterbury. For thousands of years, theologians, philosophers and scientists have been trying to
prove or disprove God's existence. Many, including the three mentioned above, have strong
proofs and theories that attempt to confirm God's existence. Although, without any scientific
evidence, how can they be entirely sure? "Philosophical proofs can be good proofs, but they do
not have to be scientific proofs," (Kreeft). Gravity similar to God's existence ; it cannot be seen
nor explained, yet it still exists. With faith, reason, understanding and even some math, God's
existence can be verified rationally. It is difficult and nearly impossible to say whether or not God
can exist because there is a definite lack of knowledge, or limited knowledge, regarding this issue.
Most human beings in society have the natural curiosity and burning desire to know if God does or
does not exist. But, when it comes to God – the possibilities are endless. He is anything and
everything – he is not

Does God Exist?
Does God Exist ?
1. What role do arguments play in answering this question?
I think arguments have played an important role in analyzing and understanding the depth of this
question, for mankind. Although the question itself seems factual (either it does or it doesn 't), yet
no arguments have been able to answer this question conclusively, despite many debates going on for
centuries. One possible reason for that inconclusiveness may lie in our intuition and the way, humans
define God and existence. We will explain why we don 't think arguments conclusively answer this
question, in more detail in answer to question 4 below.
2. Does Stroll offer any arguments that help answer this question?
Stroll himself doesn 't propose any...show more content...
Other critics of the strong version of the ontological argument point out that though it is possible to
understand the definition of god in the argument, it is inconceivable to conceive of something of
which nothing greater can be conceived. However, Stroll [1] pointed out that it is not possible to
prove his proposition against the ontological argument and same can be said about other critiques of
this argument as well. Hence the issue of existence of God is still undecided based on the ontological
argument.
Stroll [1] then discusses the design argument which is based on empirical observation and
experiment. The argument from design is a posteriori as it tries to assemble scientific,
observational evidence in support of its proposition for existence of God. The design argument
states that the natural world around us is like a complicated machine made up of smaller machines,
in which each object fulfills a purpose to complete the complex circle of life in our world. Since all
complicated artifacts can only be brought about by a designer thus the design argument proposes
God 's existence as the ultimate designer of this complicated machine. Stroll looks at arguments for
and against the design argument by the discussion of three philosophers (Cleanthes, Philo and
Demea) in the book by David Hume (Dialogues concerning natural religion).

Do God Exist ?
Thesis Statements 1. Because of man's ignorance and curiosity, arguments for the existence of God
have been made over the years. Basically, these arguments are divided into two large groups i.e.
logical and metaphysical. Actually, these arguments seek to prove that the existence of a being or
having faith with at least one attribute that only God could have is logically necessary. 2. Believing
and having faith in God will only resort to one thing–goodness. 3. Faith has something to do with
one's conception about God. 4. The existence of God remains a matter of faith since it's difficult to
"prove" God to someone who does not believe. 5. There are arguments that attempts to give
information of what they know about...show more content...
The analogy just doesn't work. Second, some say that the theories of the big bang and evolution
better explain the complexity in the universe. Third, some say that even if the teleological argument
is true, it does not prove the existence of the Christian God. 3. Ontological Argument
The third argument for God's existence is the ontological argument. This argument is unlike the
cosmological and teleological arguments in that it does not argue from evidence in the natural
world. Thus, it is not a "cause and effect" argument. The ontological argument can be stated in this
way: "God is the greatest being imaginable. One of the aspects of perfection or greatness is
existence. Thus, God exists." Or put another way–"The fact that God can be conceived means that he
must exist." This argument for God's existence was developed by the twelfth century theologian and
philosopher, Anselm. It is based on Anselm's declaration that God is "that which nothing greater can
be conceived." The ontological argument has been very controversial. Even many who believe in
God's existence question its validity. A contemporary of Anselm named Guanilo responded to
Anselm. Guanilo said that one could imagine a perfect island but that did not mean a perfect island
exists. Others have said you can imagine a unicorn but that does not mean unicorns exist. Thus,
many challenge the idea that

One burning and enduring problem in philosophy to which we have given considerable examination
is the question of the existence of God––the superlative being that philosophers have defined and
dealt with for centuries. After reading the classic arguments of St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas,
the contentious assertions of Ernest Nagel, and the compelling eyewitness accounts of Julian of
Norwich, I have been introduced to some of the most revered and referenced arguments for and
against God's existence that have been put into text. All of them are well–thought and
well–articulated arguments, but they have their holes. The question of God's true existence,
therefore, is still not definitively answered and put to rest; the intensity of this...show more content...
I have not seen a response to this problem so effectively stated, honest, and convincing. Nagel's
arguments concerning the Theodicy Problem show that atheists think in a much more
straightforward and practical fashion than do theists.
The way Nagel uses the words "unvarnished facts of human existence" (606) leads to another
attractive element to atheism and to his work––Nagel appeals to the earthly life, and only the earthly
life, in describing how atheists think. Instead of reaching out to another world or deity that does not
even certainly exist, atheists "often take as their ideal the intellectual methods employed in the
contemporaneous empirical sciences" (607). Because atheists use empirical evidence obtained
through science, i.e. use evidence that certainly exists and can be sensed, all of the thinking they do
is based solely on what clearly and distinctly exists in reality. To atheists, says Nagel, "controlled
sensory observation is the court of final appeal in issues concerning matters of fact" (608). Not all of
theist thinking is based on something that is proved to exist, since God has not been absolutely
proved to be, so the essential base of the theist thought is composed of supposition and theory.
Atheists simply ground their logic in what is certainly known, and no assumptions found their
reasoning. Even in matters of human morals, atheists think practically:

Does God Exist?
Does God exist? There is no evidence that any god exist, so I assume that there isn't one. I do not
believe in a heaven or a hell! Although, I wonder where did we come from? Where will we end up
after death? Will we rot underneath the soil? There are over twenty different religions with answers;
some similar, some different but overall, majority of them are bias. Bias, because none of them are
proven. In today's society, we humans have adapted through evolutions by using our surroundings
such like animals knowing our needs and wants with the use of reason instead of religion. There is
no set religion in this world to live by: nature acts on its own. The ambition that human–being strives
for has three main purposes reason, consideration, and courage. Each religion has their own stories
that are oral traditions passed down from generation to generation. Where are the facts? Humans
want to know the truth of the world we populate, and not supernatural details. Like science as well
as philosophy, humans study and practice to increase our knowledge on our world. There are many
religions based on race, creed, ethnicity, and other characteristics not considering that all humans
share the same moral rights. You may call me atheist. However, I believe in the truth as secular
humanism believes in reasoning.
The word humanism has a number of meanings, and because authors and speakers often don't clarify
which meaning they intend, those trying to explain humanism can easily become a

Does God Exist
Does God exist?
Does God exist? This seemingly simple question is in fact loaded with a myriad of twists and turns
that scientists and theologians have debated for years without reaching an accepted conclusion. Part
of the problem lies in the many definitions of God. Traditionally it is accepted that God is a supreme
being, infallible, perfect, and existing outside of the material world of humanity. It is this definition
that is generally used when debating God's existence. There have been several arguments made using
this definition both for and against the existence of God. "Arguments for the existence of God
typically include metaphysical, empirical, inductive, and subjective types. Arguments against
typically include empirical,...show more content...
He states,
Most people understand that sexual lust has to do with propagating genes. Copulation in nature
tends to lead to reproduction and so to more genetic copies. But in modern society, most
copulations involve contraception, designed precisely to avoid reproduction. Altruism probably
has origins like those of lust. In our prehistoric past, we would have lived in extended families,
surrounded by kin whose interests we might have wanted to promote because they shared our
genesВ… Just as people engaged in sex with contraception are not aware of being motivated by a
drive to have babies, it doesn't cross our mind that the reason for do–gooding is based in the fact that
our primitive ancestors lived in small groupsВ… that seems to me to be a highly plausible account
for where the desire for morality, the desire for goodness, comes from.
In addition, the moral argument, like the design argument, if valid, may indicate a higher being but
this being is not necessarily the perfect God presented in most religions. Just as there are numerous
arguments for the existence of God there are equally as many arguing against his existence. One of
these is the Sociological theory of religion. This theory states that religious gods are the unconscious
fabrication of society brought about in order to control individual thought and behavior. The major
criticism of this argument is the wide spread nature of

Does God Exist? Essay
Religion is something that virtually all humans have in common. In all corners of the world and in
all eras of history, people have wondered about the meaning of life, how to make the best of it, what
happens afterwards and if there is anyone or anything "out there." The world of philosophy consists
of so many unanswered questions. One such question is whether or not God exists. This is the very
question that has grasped the imagination of humanity since the birth of reason, and the same
question that has plagued scientists and philosophers without coming close to an accepted
conclusion. God is a word that means different things to different people. The definition for God,
according to most monotheistic religions is the creator and ruler...show more content...
William Paley presented the watchmaker analogy in his Natural Theology (1802) "Suppose I found
a watch upon the ground, and it should be inquired how the watch happened to be in that place, I
should hardly think... that, for anything I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why
should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for a stone that happened to be lying on the
ground? For this reason, and for no other; namely, that, if the different parts had been differently
shaped from what they are, if a different size from what they are, or placed after any other manner,
or in any order that in which they are placed, either no motion at all would have been carried on in
the machine, or none which would have answered the use that is now served by it." Paley wrote
in response to Hume's objection to analogy between artefacts and worlds, choosing to use the
example of a watch as a reliable indication of divine design. Paley identifies two features of a
watch which demonstrate that it is designed. First, a watch performs a valuable purpose,
timekeeping, which a designer would find useful and secondly, the watch would be unable to
perform such a purpose if it's parts were any different or arranged differently. He strongly argued
that the world of nature showcases more

The belief in Gods has always existed throughout human's recored history. Whether it be the Greek
Gods: Apollo, and Zeus, or the Judeo–Christian God, believed by Christians in modern day society.
The belief of God has always existed among humans, however, assuming God does not exist, what
explains the cultural evolution of such a false belief, namely religion? I shall argue that the reason
this false belief is successful is because it manipulates human nature better than any other belief by
these three points: an avoidance of death (the soul), a sense of worth (knowledge), and a sense, or
need of belief (faith). This question is inherent in clarifying the undoubtedly success this false belief
has had through human's existence. However,...show more content...
Finally, the third section will dwell on the controversial topic of faith, and human's need for belief.
Religion has done an excellent job in manipulating human's need for trust. Therefore, the
combination of these three sections should compel the reader to better understand why such a false
belief, such as religion has had such success throughout history. The first section of this paper should
properly be named: "The Happy Ending," as it seems fitting for this point of success for religion. It is
not unfair to assert that one of humans greatest fears is death, the thought of become nothingness.
Honestly, is there ever a point in ones own life that they can think, or even experience nothingness?
Evidently the answer should be no, as we are always something, always being. For a human this is an
overwhelming, and at times frightening thought. Especially when science and many atheist comes to
the conclusion that when a human dies nothing happens, there is no happy ending –– sadly,
nothingness seems to be the answer. With that being said, however, religion has offered an
alternative answer, one which most definitely appeals to many humans; and more importantly gives
humans a way out of death. Before moving forward it maybe important to clarify the term death and
what its meaning is for the purposes of this essay. Obviously not even religion can save an
individual from dying, humans are biological beings, thus time is never on

The question of the existence of a higher power, or a god, has long plagued philosophers. Today,
much of the intellectual community believe that a god does not, and cannot exist. Yet, for much of
the world's population there is a firm belief in a deity. McCloskey in his article "On Being an
Atheist", outlines the reasons he believes theists are wrong. As a result it is only natural for theists
to examine his work and see if his points truly defeat the idea of god's existence.
McCloskey begins by denying the idea that the existence of a god has been proven by the classical
arguments for his existence (McCloskey, 1968). In fact, this is true. The proofs McCloskey
references do not prove the existence of god, rather they contend that god is...show more content...
Some, like McCloskey, dispute that there needs to be an explanation. Perhaps these objects
simply exists, and that is a fact that must be accepted (Evans & Manis, 2009). Philosophically,
accepting a fact like this not an answer to the question, but rather turning a blind eye to it. Another
argument is that every contingent element simply relies on another contingent element, creating a
circle of contingent elements supporting one another (Evans & Manis, 2009). Because of this
the whole series of contingent objects cannot be fully explained, nor do they have a reason to
exist. Neither of these two atheistic explanations actually answer the question of why or how
these contingent objects exist. To say that an answer to this question does not exist or is not
needed is to say that true meaning does not exist nor is it needed (Evans & Manis, 2009). The end
result of McCloskey's view is that there does not need to be any reason why the universe is the way
it is, which is a rather hard view for a philosopher to take.
Next, McCloskey proclaims that these proofs do not mean that there is an omnipotent, perfect, and
ever existing being. Again, he is correct. The arguments never claim that they attempt to prove
such a deity exists (Evans & Manis, 2009). The point of the arguments are to make a case that
there is a reason a god or gods would exist, not to prove that a certain god exists(Evans & Manis,
2009).

Does God Exist?
A Philosophical Argument for the Existence of God Does God Exist? If God so desired, He could
merely appear and attest to the whole of humankind that He exists. But if He did that, there would
be no need for faith. "Then Jesus told him, 'Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed
are those who have not seen and yet have believed '" (John 20:29). I'm sure an abundance of people
would love for someone to simply show them the evidence for God 's existence. Enough of those
statements of, "You just have to believe" or "Just have some faith" such statements that leave
many people with no comfort or acceptance. I would like to attempt to point out some of the
reasons that lead me undoubtedly believe that God exists. First of all, consider the following.
When it comes to the prospect of God 's existence, the Bible says that there are individuals who
have seen sufficient evidence, but they have concealed the truth they have seen. On the other
hand, for those who continue to wonder if God is there, he says, "You will seek me and find me;
when you seek me with all your heart, I will be found by you." Before one looks at the facts
surrounding God 's existence, one must ask themselves, if God does exist, would I want to know
him? To follow are some reasons to consider. First of all, the most familiar argument is that
something must have caused the Universe to exist. Philosophers call this the Cosmological
Argument, and early advocates of this specific

Does God exist? This burning, three–word question has been argued over since the beginning of man
kind. Everyone has their own opinion about religion, and Martin Luther and RГ©ne Descartes were
no exception to that statement. Both men, born in the 15th century and 16th century respectively,
had a desire to seek out the truth and answer to that question. Whether it was from diligently
studying scripture, or going out into the expansive world, each man found what they were looking
for. In Luther's book, On Christian Liberty, and in Descartes' book, Discourse on the Method, each
author wrote of their findings. While Luther and Descartes both concluded that God did exist, each
man had a different means of getting to the truth. Thesis: which was better? When someone makes a
bold statement, the general consensus is that they should have some sort of reasoning to back it up.
This is exactly what Descartes thought. His journey to seeking truth first started when he was a
child. He was educated in all subjects, but just as soon as they ended, he was curious for more. So
he went out into the world to try to find the truth he had been looking for. While he did learn new
things, he was never satisfied. Finally, when he had exasperated the books and world, he was left
with nothing other than himself. But this put him exactly where he needed to be. From meditative,
self reflection he found his truth. He wrote on page 64, "I think, therefore I am". Descartes
concluded that nothing was for

Does God Really Exists? Essay
Does God Really Exists The idea of God has been one of the most debatable issues since the dawn
of humanity and with it guided as well as deluded most lives in the pursuit for the truth. The impacts
springing from the notion of God has from time memorial changed history, inspired more poetry and
music including philosophy more than anything else, imagined or real. Peter Kreft once concluded
that "The idea of God is either a fact, like sand, or a fantasy like Santa" (Lawhead, p. 334). Over the
cause of time, different arguments have surfaced within and without the philoshophical boundaries
in an attempt to either explain the reality of the non–existence of a God. A few of these claims include
the, cosmological argument, the teleological argument and the problem of evil. However, although
both arguments are insufficiently conclusive in their arguments about God, the cosmological
argument seems to speaker quite louder than the rest and thus forms the basis of this paper: it
generates the conclusion that God exists based on fundamental considerations about the cause of the
world and why there is something rather than nothing. To begin with, teleological argument posits
God's existence based on the appearance of design. The Cosmological and the teleological
arguments are both based on empirical or a posterior reasoning and have their roots deepened in
philosophy history. On the contrary, the problem of evils supports the argument that God does not
exist based on the presence

Does God Exist Essay
God Does Exist!
P1: God is a maximally great being.
P2: If God is a maximally great being, then God is a necessary entity.
P3: If God exists necessarily, then God exists in all possible worlds.
P4: If God exists in all possible worlds, then God exists in our world.
P5: If God exists in our world, then God Exists.
C1: God Exists
My argument is a great argument. A maximally great being is defined as an entity who possesses
all favorable attributes such as love and morality. These attributes also include necessity. A
necessary entity is one that exists in all worlds and cannot be proven false, making it a favorable
attribute. A square, for example, necessarily exists. The square cannot exist in our world with only
three sides. Because it can't exist in our world with only three sides, it can't exist in all possible
worlds. Therefore, a necessary entity cannot be false, and...show more content...
However, this is considered to be logically absurd. By asking if a maximally great being can make
a burrito so spicy, that even he can't eat it, is to imply that the definition of omnipotent is the
ability to do the logically impossible. In actuality, the definition of omnipotent is to have a very
great or almighty power, not to do what is logically impossible. It is similar to ask if God can
create a square with three sides. The three sided square does not exist in this world. If it cannot
exist in this world then it cannot exist in any possible world because the square with four sides is
necessarily existing. If it cannot exist in any possible world, then it's logically incomprehensible
and cannot be answered by anyone. You can't use a logical absurdity to disprove God'sexistence
because the argument has to follow order. If my argument about God's existence has to follow logic
and order, then so does a refutation trying to disprove God's

Does God Exist Philosophy Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Online Paper Writing Services Haynes

More from Online Paper Writing Services Haynes (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Does God Exist Philosophy Essay