3. Types of Nerve injury
SEDDON SUNDERLAND INJURY RECOVERY
NEUROPRAXIA DEGREE I CONDUCTION NERVE BLOCK,
RESOLVES SPONTANEOUSLY
FAST/EXCELLENT
AXONOTMESIS • DEGREE II
• DEGREE III
• DEGREE IV
• AXONAL RUPTURE WITHOUT
INTERRUPTION OF THE BASAL
LAMINA
• RUPTURE OF BOTH AXONS AND
BASAL LAMINA TUBES
• COMPLETE SCAR BLOCK
• SLOW/EXCELLENT
• SLOW/INCOMPLETE
• NONE
NEUROTMESIS DEGREE V COMPLETE TRANSECTION NONE
DEGREE VI
(MACKINNON)
COMBINATION OF I-IV
WITH/WITHOUT NORMAL FASCICLES
MIXED
8. EVALUATION OF NERVE INJURY
CLINICAL EXAMINATION
SEMMES-WEINSTEIN FILAMENTS
TWO POINT STATIC AND MOVING
DISCRIMINATION
TENS TEST
ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC
EMG CHANGES PRECEED CLINICAL
RECOVERY (EG MOTOR UNIT
POTENTIALS)
9. GRADING OF SENSORY RECOVERY
S0- NO RECOVERY
S1 – DEEP CUTANEOUS SENSATION
S2 – SUPERFICIAL CUTANEOUS SENSATION
S2+ - HYPERRESPONSE OF S2
S3 – PAIN AND TOUCH SENSATION WITH
LOSS OF HYPERRESPONSE, TWO POINT
DISCRIMINATION >15MM
S3+ - GOOD LOCALIZATION, TWO POINT
DISCRIMINATION 7-15MM
S4 – COMPLETE RECOVERY; TWO POINT
DISCRIMINATION 2-6MM
GRADING OF MOTOR RECOVERY
M0 – NO CONTRACTION
M1- PALPABLE CONTRACTION
M2 – ACTIVE JOINT MOTION – BUT NOT AGAINST
GRAVITY
M3 – ACTIVE JOINT MOVEMENT AGAINST
GRAVITY
M4 – FULL RANGE OF ACTIVITY AGAINST
GRAVITY – SUBNORMAL STRENGTH
M5 - FULL RANGE OF ACTIVE MOTION – NORMAL
STRENGTH
12. EPINEURAL V/S
FASICULAR
EPINEURAL REPAIR IS THE PREFERRED
METHOD
FASICULAR REPAIR CAN BE TRIED FOR
MAJOR PERIPHERAL NERVE TO
IMPROVE ALIGNMENT
CLINICAL STUDIES SUPPORT BOTH
TECHNIQUES AS LONG AS FASICLES
WERE NOT OVERLAPPED.
DISADVANTAGE OF PERINEURAL
REPAIR WAS EXTENSIVE DISSECTION
AND PERMENANT INTRANEURAL
STITCH LED TO INCREASE FIBROSIS.
13. INTRA OPERATIVE NERVE
STIMULATION
UNCOMPICATED NERVE INJURIES (TRANSECTION/NERUROMA IN
CONTINUITY INVOLVING THE ENTIRE CROSS SECTION) – NO USE
MAINLY USED IN - CLOSED TRACTION INJURIES (BRACHIAL
PLEXUS/LARGER MIXED PERIPHERAL NERVES IN THE EXTREMITIES)
ALSO, WHERE EMG RESULT IS EQUIVOCAL OR ADDITIONAL
REOCVERY MAY HAVE OCCURRED BETWEEN THE TIME OF PREVIOUS
STUDY AND OPERATION
14. FACTORS AFFECTING OUTCOME
AGE OF PATIENT - CHILDREN V/S ADULTS
DEGREE AND TYPE OF INJURY – CRUSH V/S SHARP CUT, PROXIMAL V/S DISTAL
TIME OF REPAIR –
FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY = NUMBER OF MOTOR AXONS REACHING THE TARGET ENDPLATE
TIME OF DENERVATION
16. NERVE TRANSFERS
INDICATIONS
1. BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY WITH ONLY VERY PROXIMAL OR NO NERVE AVAILABLE
FOR GRAFTING
2. HIGH PROXIMAL INJURY THAT REQUIRES A LONG DISTANCE FOR REGENERATION
3. SCARRED AREAS IN CRITICAL LOCATIONS WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY TO CRITICAL
STRUCTURES
4. MAJOR LIMB TRAUMA WITH SEGMENTAL LOSS OF NERVE TISSUE REQUIRING
SEVERAL GRAFTS
5. PROLONGED TIME FROM INJURY TO RECONSTRAUCTION AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO
NERVE GRAFTING
6. PARTIAL NERVE INJURY WITH A DEFINED FUCTIONAL LOSS
7. SPINAL CORD AVULSION INJURY
8. IDOPATHIC NEURITIDES,RADIATION TRAUMA, AND NERVE INJURIES WHERE THE
LEVEL OF INJURY IS UNCERTAIN.
17. NERVE TRANSFER V/S TENDON
TRANSFER
NERVE TRANSFER CAN RESTORE SENSIBILITY IN ADDITION TO
MOTOR FUNCTION
A NERVE THAT INNERVATES MULTIPLE MUSCLE GROUPS CAN BE
RESTORED WITH A SINGLE NERVE TRANSFER
THE INSERTION AND ATTACHMENT OF MUSCLES ARE NOT
DISRUPTED
18. FUTURE IN NERVE REPAIR
NEURAL TUBES POPULATED WITH SCHWANN CELLS AND
NEUROTROPHIC PROCESS.
TROPHIC FACTORS – NERVE GROWTH FACTOR, BRAIN DERIVED
NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR,FIBROBLASTIC GROWTH FACTOR,CILIARY
NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR, IL-6
NERVE GROWTH FACTOR AND FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR –
ENHANCED NERVE REGENERATION
LEUPEPTIN- CALPAIN INHIBITOR, BLOCKS THE CALPAIN PROTEASE
MEDIATED ABSORPTION OF MOTOR END-PLATES.