Researching your biography
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
2 likes•596 views
A biography summarizes the life of a person by including important facts and experiences. To write a biography, research must be done to learn about the famous person. When researching online, it is important to find credible websites by evaluating the author's expertise, whether the site is up-to-date, objective, and cites multiple sources. The first step is searching the person's name and assessing website extensions like .edu or .gov, which tend to be more reliable than .com. Notes should be taken on key details like birthplace, cause of fame, and interesting facts.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Comp 150 fall 16
This document provides an overview of services and resources available at Reed Library. It discusses library services like reference help, borrowing items, study rooms, and more. The collections include 150k books, 200k ebooks, 100+ databases, and streaming media. The document demonstrates how to search the library catalog and database for materials, and evaluates search results like magazine articles and academic journals. It also introduces bibliographic management tools and explains how librarians can help with research.
Using Primary Sources
This document defines and compares different types of sources used in research: primary, secondary, and tertiary. It explains that primary sources are original materials created at the time under study, while secondary sources are analyses and interpretations of primary sources created by other researchers. Tertiary sources synthesize secondary sources. The document notes that primary sources lack typical research aids and require determining their context, including who created them, when and where, and why, in order to draw conclusions from them.
Websites you can trust or not
The document discusses how to identify trustworthy and untrustworthy websites. It suggests that Wikipedia cannot always be trusted because facts are contributed by regular people without verification. Individual websites stating opinions as facts should also be viewed skeptically. Websites with spelling mistakes and lack of punctuation may indicate low quality information. More reliable sources of news and information on specific topics include reputable news organizations and sites run by experts in the subject area.
TCS: Conversion Optimization Tools + Social, Augmented Reality + Virtual Real...
This is Part 10 of the Roland Frasier mega presentation on business tools and marketing tools from Traffic & Conversion Summit 2017 in San Diego, California. This deck contains CRO tools, conversion optimization tools, augmented reality tools, mixed reality tools, virtual reality tools and social marketing tools
Connected Content: The Future of Information
The last decade has seen an explosion of channels and devices. And the pace of change is only accelerating. How do you prepare for the next disruption? Are you ready for the new frontier where we interact with our voice rather than clicking, tapping, and reading? It’s time for an end-to-end process for building a structured content framework. One that lets you plan and design interfaces and content delivery systems that meet the needs of today and are ready for the opportunities of tomorrow. Discover a design method that starts with content, not pixels, by showing the interplay of content strategy, content design, and content management.
375643 634074779366488750
This document introduces the CRAAP test for evaluating information sources. The CRAAP test consists of 5 criteria - Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Each criterion is explained in 1-2 sentences. Currency refers to how up-to-date the information is. Relevance means how effectively the source communicates information to its intended audience. Authority evaluates the author's credentials and expertise. Accuracy examines the reliability and verifiability of the content. Purpose determines why the source was created and any potential biases. The document provides examples and guidelines for applying each aspect of the CRAAP test.
How to search the web
The document provides tips and guidance for effectively searching the web using search engines and directories. It discusses using keywords, quotation marks, plus and minus signs, and the "OR" operator to refine searches. It also offers questions to consider when evaluating websites such as checking for bias, the author's credentials, whether sources are cited, and why the page was created.
TCS: Competitive Intelligence Tools - Tools Presentation Part 1
This is part 1 of Roland Frasier's marketing tools and business tools presentation from Traffic & Conversion Summit 2017 in San Diego, California
Recommended
Comp 150 fall 16
This document provides an overview of services and resources available at Reed Library. It discusses library services like reference help, borrowing items, study rooms, and more. The collections include 150k books, 200k ebooks, 100+ databases, and streaming media. The document demonstrates how to search the library catalog and database for materials, and evaluates search results like magazine articles and academic journals. It also introduces bibliographic management tools and explains how librarians can help with research.
Using Primary Sources
This document defines and compares different types of sources used in research: primary, secondary, and tertiary. It explains that primary sources are original materials created at the time under study, while secondary sources are analyses and interpretations of primary sources created by other researchers. Tertiary sources synthesize secondary sources. The document notes that primary sources lack typical research aids and require determining their context, including who created them, when and where, and why, in order to draw conclusions from them.
Websites you can trust or not
The document discusses how to identify trustworthy and untrustworthy websites. It suggests that Wikipedia cannot always be trusted because facts are contributed by regular people without verification. Individual websites stating opinions as facts should also be viewed skeptically. Websites with spelling mistakes and lack of punctuation may indicate low quality information. More reliable sources of news and information on specific topics include reputable news organizations and sites run by experts in the subject area.
TCS: Conversion Optimization Tools + Social, Augmented Reality + Virtual Real...
This is Part 10 of the Roland Frasier mega presentation on business tools and marketing tools from Traffic & Conversion Summit 2017 in San Diego, California. This deck contains CRO tools, conversion optimization tools, augmented reality tools, mixed reality tools, virtual reality tools and social marketing tools
Connected Content: The Future of Information
The last decade has seen an explosion of channels and devices. And the pace of change is only accelerating. How do you prepare for the next disruption? Are you ready for the new frontier where we interact with our voice rather than clicking, tapping, and reading? It’s time for an end-to-end process for building a structured content framework. One that lets you plan and design interfaces and content delivery systems that meet the needs of today and are ready for the opportunities of tomorrow. Discover a design method that starts with content, not pixels, by showing the interplay of content strategy, content design, and content management.
375643 634074779366488750
This document introduces the CRAAP test for evaluating information sources. The CRAAP test consists of 5 criteria - Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Each criterion is explained in 1-2 sentences. Currency refers to how up-to-date the information is. Relevance means how effectively the source communicates information to its intended audience. Authority evaluates the author's credentials and expertise. Accuracy examines the reliability and verifiability of the content. Purpose determines why the source was created and any potential biases. The document provides examples and guidelines for applying each aspect of the CRAAP test.
How to search the web
The document provides tips and guidance for effectively searching the web using search engines and directories. It discusses using keywords, quotation marks, plus and minus signs, and the "OR" operator to refine searches. It also offers questions to consider when evaluating websites such as checking for bias, the author's credentials, whether sources are cited, and why the page was created.
TCS: Competitive Intelligence Tools - Tools Presentation Part 1
This is part 1 of Roland Frasier's marketing tools and business tools presentation from Traffic & Conversion Summit 2017 in San Diego, California
Websites you can trust or not
The document discusses how to identify trustworthy and untrustworthy websites. It suggests that Wikipedia cannot always be trusted because facts are added by regular people without verification. Individual websites stating opinions as facts should also be viewed skeptically. Websites with spelling mistakes and lack of punctuation may not provide reliable information as they indicate low quality. Recommended trustworthy sites include major news organizations and sites run by experts on a given subject, such as the NBA's official website for information about basketball.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses checking the domain name to determine the sponsor's reliability. Key questions to consider include the 5 Ws: who wrote it, what is the purpose/content, when was it created/updated, where did the information come from, and why should it be trusted. Additionally, the appearance and functionality of the site should be examined to ensure it is professional, loads quickly, and is easy to navigate. The example shows a student evaluating two dragonfly websites, determining that the .edu site "Dragonflies of Kentucky" would be best for a research project due to more complete information and affiliation with an educational institution.
Awesome Essay Ideas
The document provides steps for requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It outlines the registration process, how to submit a request by completing an order form and providing instructions and sources, and how writers will bid on the request. It notes that after receiving a paper, customers can request revisions if needed and that HelpWriting.net guarantees original, high-quality content or a full refund.
Evaluating websites
Presentation of information from Common Sense Media on evaluating websites. Designed for middle school but will be used as refresher for high school students before a research project.
Website Evaluation Presentation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and quality in order to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite for school assignments. It recommends using the Five W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - as a framework to analyze the author's credentials, purpose of site, date of publication, domain type, and sources cited. Students are reminded to consider more than one website and also use print resources, as the quality of sources impacts teachers' evaluation of student work. Being a careful evaluator is important for making informed decisions.
Good information
This document provides guidelines for evaluating the reliability of information sources. It discusses asking questions about the relevance, timeliness, accuracy, and credentials of authors and publishers of research, websites, newspapers/periodicals, and books. Key questions include considering the purpose and date of information as well as whether multiple people contributed. Websites ending in .edu, .org, or .gov are generally more trustworthy than personal .com or .net sites run by individuals.
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It recommends asking questions about the author's expertise, potential biases, use of evidence, and publication venue. Credible sources include well-established websites from experts in the field, as well as mainstream news sites. Government and educational websites ending in .gov and .edu require additional scrutiny. Fact-checking sites can help verify questionable information. Overall, critical evaluation of sources is important to determine what can reasonably be considered factual.
Strategic Outreach: Use of Social Media in the Job Search Process
A presentation I made to the Massachusetts Bar Association/Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers attorney job search group in December 2012.
How to use a website
This document discusses evaluating the credibility of online sources for research. It notes that anyone can publish information online, so it is important to consider who is paying for the site and whether the information is credible or not. Credible sources mentioned include college and government websites, newspapers, and About.com which pays experts. Wikipedia is not considered a credible source for research papers due to the ability of any user to edit pages. The document provides examples of websites on Greek mythology and instructions on citing website sources, noting that the author, title, sponsor, and date should be included.
Wc web evaluation lesson 6th
1) The document discusses how to evaluate websites for research purposes using the ABCA criteria of Authority, Bias, Currency, and Accuracy.
2) It explains each criteria, such as checking for an author's expertise (Authority), potential biases in the content or purpose of the site (Bias), how recently the site was updated (Currency), and reviewing the information for errors or questionable claims (Accuracy).
3) The document provides examples of citing websites and applying the ABCA evaluation to determine if a site is appropriate for school research.
Robot spiders and hippos
Stephen Croome's presentation, prepared for the Authority 2.0 conference- http://eventwith.me/authority2 .
Unfortunately, Stephen was ill on the day, and unable to travel to the event.
Evaluation Of A Site
This document provides guidance on evaluating the quality and credibility of websites for research and citations. It discusses a number of factors to consider, referred to as CARRDSS, which stand for Credibility, Accuracy, Reliability, Relevance, Date, Sources, and Scope. Credibility factors include considering the author's credentials and expertise, as well as clues about who published the content. Accuracy involves checking if facts can be verified from other reliable sources. Reliability addresses any biases present. Relevance is about how directly the content relates to the research topic. Date refers to when the content was created and last updated. Sources refers to whether the author cited reliable references. Scope examines the depth and intended audience of the content
Online Research (2)
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider that can help determine whether a site is a good source of information or not. The document also provides some tips on using search engines like Google to investigate authors, sponsors and potential biases. It recommends additional online research resources available through the HISD library system.
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for reliability and quality. It recommends checking the domain name to determine the sponsor, with .edu, .gov and .org domains generally being more reliable. It also recommends considering the 5 W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - such as checking for the author's credentials, purpose of the site, when it was last updated. Finally, it suggests examining website characteristics like load speed, easy navigation, lack of errors or interfering ads. An example compares two dragonfly websites, finding one superior for research due to more complete information like author and date.
website work
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of information found on websites. It outlines several factors to consider, such as checking who authored the content and whether their credentials can be verified, comparing the information to other reliable sources, assessing if the content is biased or presents multiple perspectives, and confirming the information is up to date. The overall aim is to help people identify trustworthy websites and confidently determine which sites to use for research or answering questions.
Website Work
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites. It outlines several factors to consider, such as checking who authored the content and whether their credentials can be verified, comparing information across multiple sources, assessing if the content is biased or presents alternative perspectives, and confirming the information is up-to-date. The document encourages users to consult multiple websites on a topic rather than relying solely on a single source. It aims to help readers confidently determine which websites can be trusted for information.
Lookup public record 2
Public records contain information about individuals that is available for public view and can be obtained legally. Reasons to lookup public records include hiring employees, learning about romantic partners or suspicious individuals, or locating lost friends. Online public records searches have made the process hassle-free and cost-efficient, as many websites provide records for free or low fees. Caution should be taken as some non-authorized websites may contain fake information.
Helping kids learn through research
This document provides guidance for parents on helping their children with research. It discusses different types of resources available for research, including print, electronic, and primary sources. It also covers how to evaluate the reliability of websites and emphasizes the importance of teaching children to properly cite their sources and use information ethically from a young age.
ORCID Communications & Messaging
The document summarizes an ORCID outreach meeting that covered developing an elevator pitch for ORCID, engaging with communities, and addressing myths about ORCID. Speakers at the meeting included representatives from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Princeton University, and the Australian Access Federation. Attendees were encouraged to develop an elevator pitch for ORCID that is 30 seconds to 2 minutes, uses plain English, tells a compelling story, and includes words like open, new, approachable, etc. The meeting also addressed common myths about ORCID like whether it is needed in addition to other profiles, how easy it is to update, privacy/security concerns, and why different services now request ORCID IDs.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Additional tips include checking URLs for clues about the domain, considering print and subscription sources, and evaluating blogs based on the author, content, comments, updates, and biases addressed. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than settling for those that are "good enough" and to keep in mind that source quality affects the evaluation of their own work.
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
"How to make and deliver dynamic presentations by making it more interactive to captivate your audience attention"
More Related Content
Similar to Researching your biography
Websites you can trust or not
The document discusses how to identify trustworthy and untrustworthy websites. It suggests that Wikipedia cannot always be trusted because facts are added by regular people without verification. Individual websites stating opinions as facts should also be viewed skeptically. Websites with spelling mistakes and lack of punctuation may not provide reliable information as they indicate low quality. Recommended trustworthy sites include major news organizations and sites run by experts on a given subject, such as the NBA's official website for information about basketball.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses checking the domain name to determine the sponsor's reliability. Key questions to consider include the 5 Ws: who wrote it, what is the purpose/content, when was it created/updated, where did the information come from, and why should it be trusted. Additionally, the appearance and functionality of the site should be examined to ensure it is professional, loads quickly, and is easy to navigate. The example shows a student evaluating two dragonfly websites, determining that the .edu site "Dragonflies of Kentucky" would be best for a research project due to more complete information and affiliation with an educational institution.
Awesome Essay Ideas
The document provides steps for requesting writing assistance from HelpWriting.net. It outlines the registration process, how to submit a request by completing an order form and providing instructions and sources, and how writers will bid on the request. It notes that after receiving a paper, customers can request revisions if needed and that HelpWriting.net guarantees original, high-quality content or a full refund.
Evaluating websites
Presentation of information from Common Sense Media on evaluating websites. Designed for middle school but will be used as refresher for high school students before a research project.
Website Evaluation Presentation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and quality in order to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite for school assignments. It recommends using the Five W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - as a framework to analyze the author's credentials, purpose of site, date of publication, domain type, and sources cited. Students are reminded to consider more than one website and also use print resources, as the quality of sources impacts teachers' evaluation of student work. Being a careful evaluator is important for making informed decisions.
Good information
This document provides guidelines for evaluating the reliability of information sources. It discusses asking questions about the relevance, timeliness, accuracy, and credentials of authors and publishers of research, websites, newspapers/periodicals, and books. Key questions include considering the purpose and date of information as well as whether multiple people contributed. Websites ending in .edu, .org, or .gov are generally more trustworthy than personal .com or .net sites run by individuals.
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It recommends asking questions about the author's expertise, potential biases, use of evidence, and publication venue. Credible sources include well-established websites from experts in the field, as well as mainstream news sites. Government and educational websites ending in .gov and .edu require additional scrutiny. Fact-checking sites can help verify questionable information. Overall, critical evaluation of sources is important to determine what can reasonably be considered factual.
Strategic Outreach: Use of Social Media in the Job Search Process
A presentation I made to the Massachusetts Bar Association/Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers attorney job search group in December 2012.
How to use a website
This document discusses evaluating the credibility of online sources for research. It notes that anyone can publish information online, so it is important to consider who is paying for the site and whether the information is credible or not. Credible sources mentioned include college and government websites, newspapers, and About.com which pays experts. Wikipedia is not considered a credible source for research papers due to the ability of any user to edit pages. The document provides examples of websites on Greek mythology and instructions on citing website sources, noting that the author, title, sponsor, and date should be included.
Wc web evaluation lesson 6th
1) The document discusses how to evaluate websites for research purposes using the ABCA criteria of Authority, Bias, Currency, and Accuracy.
2) It explains each criteria, such as checking for an author's expertise (Authority), potential biases in the content or purpose of the site (Bias), how recently the site was updated (Currency), and reviewing the information for errors or questionable claims (Accuracy).
3) The document provides examples of citing websites and applying the ABCA evaluation to determine if a site is appropriate for school research.
Robot spiders and hippos
Stephen Croome's presentation, prepared for the Authority 2.0 conference- http://eventwith.me/authority2 .
Unfortunately, Stephen was ill on the day, and unable to travel to the event.
Evaluation Of A Site
This document provides guidance on evaluating the quality and credibility of websites for research and citations. It discusses a number of factors to consider, referred to as CARRDSS, which stand for Credibility, Accuracy, Reliability, Relevance, Date, Sources, and Scope. Credibility factors include considering the author's credentials and expertise, as well as clues about who published the content. Accuracy involves checking if facts can be verified from other reliable sources. Reliability addresses any biases present. Relevance is about how directly the content relates to the research topic. Date refers to when the content was created and last updated. Sources refers to whether the author cited reliable references. Scope examines the depth and intended audience of the content
Online Research (2)
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider that can help determine whether a site is a good source of information or not. The document also provides some tips on using search engines like Google to investigate authors, sponsors and potential biases. It recommends additional online research resources available through the HISD library system.
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for reliability and quality. It recommends checking the domain name to determine the sponsor, with .edu, .gov and .org domains generally being more reliable. It also recommends considering the 5 W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - such as checking for the author's credentials, purpose of the site, when it was last updated. Finally, it suggests examining website characteristics like load speed, easy navigation, lack of errors or interfering ads. An example compares two dragonfly websites, finding one superior for research due to more complete information like author and date.
website work
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of information found on websites. It outlines several factors to consider, such as checking who authored the content and whether their credentials can be verified, comparing the information to other reliable sources, assessing if the content is biased or presents multiple perspectives, and confirming the information is up to date. The overall aim is to help people identify trustworthy websites and confidently determine which sites to use for research or answering questions.
Website Work
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites. It outlines several factors to consider, such as checking who authored the content and whether their credentials can be verified, comparing information across multiple sources, assessing if the content is biased or presents alternative perspectives, and confirming the information is up-to-date. The document encourages users to consult multiple websites on a topic rather than relying solely on a single source. It aims to help readers confidently determine which websites can be trusted for information.
Lookup public record 2
Public records contain information about individuals that is available for public view and can be obtained legally. Reasons to lookup public records include hiring employees, learning about romantic partners or suspicious individuals, or locating lost friends. Online public records searches have made the process hassle-free and cost-efficient, as many websites provide records for free or low fees. Caution should be taken as some non-authorized websites may contain fake information.
Helping kids learn through research
This document provides guidance for parents on helping their children with research. It discusses different types of resources available for research, including print, electronic, and primary sources. It also covers how to evaluate the reliability of websites and emphasizes the importance of teaching children to properly cite their sources and use information ethically from a young age.
ORCID Communications & Messaging
The document summarizes an ORCID outreach meeting that covered developing an elevator pitch for ORCID, engaging with communities, and addressing myths about ORCID. Speakers at the meeting included representatives from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Princeton University, and the Australian Access Federation. Attendees were encouraged to develop an elevator pitch for ORCID that is 30 seconds to 2 minutes, uses plain English, tells a compelling story, and includes words like open, new, approachable, etc. The meeting also addressed common myths about ORCID like whether it is needed in addition to other profiles, how easy it is to update, privacy/security concerns, and why different services now request ORCID IDs.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Additional tips include checking URLs for clues about the domain, considering print and subscription sources, and evaluating blogs based on the author, content, comments, updates, and biases addressed. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than settling for those that are "good enough" and to keep in mind that source quality affects the evaluation of their own work.
Similar to Researching your biography (20)
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Strategic Outreach: Use of Social Media in the Job Search Process
Strategic Outreach: Use of Social Media in the Job Search Process
Recently uploaded
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
"How to make and deliver dynamic presentations by making it more interactive to captivate your audience attention"
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف أحرف الخلاف للقراء العشرةأعد أحرف الخلاف بالتلوين وصلا سمير بسيوني غفر الله له
Stack Memory Organization of 8086 Microprocessor
The stack memory organization of 8086 microprocessor.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/qhtvq32h4ybf9t49ku85x0n3xl4jhr15Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N Roll Records presentation by Izzy Vazquez for Music Retail and Distribution class at Full Sail University
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Physical pharmaceutics notes for B.pharm students
Recently uploaded (20)
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
Researching your biography
- 1. Researching Your Biography By Mrs. Manross
- 2. What is a Biography? O A biography is a history of someone’s life O It includes important facts about that person’s life O It should also talk about interesting experiences the person has had
- 3. Getting Started O You will need to do research to learn more about your famous person O When you research you must know how to find a good website
- 4. Finding Good Websites O Not all websites are created equal O Some are better than others O How can you tell what a good website is?
- 5. Tips on Finding Good Websites O Credibility O Accuracy O Reasonableness O Support
- 6. More About Cars O Credibility O Who is the author? O Do they have the background needed to be an expert on the person? O What is the extension of the web address? O A .edu or .gov usually has more credibility than a .com
- 7. More About Cars O Accuracy O Is the web site up to date? O Does the web site include as much information about the person as possible? O What is the purpose of the web site?
- 8. More About Cars O Reasonableness O Is the information fair? O Does the writer take a biased point of view?
- 9. More About Cars O Support O Where did the information come from? O Did the author use more than one source?
- 10. Now You Are Ready to Begin Researching O Your first step will be to type in your person’s name in a reputable search engine such as Google O Look at the file extensions for the sites that come up-is a .gov going to be more reliable than a .com? O Take notes!
- 11. Note taking O What kinds of things will you jot down? O Start with: O Where and when your person was born O Why was your person famous? O At least two interesting things about your person
- 12. You are Ready to Begin! O Find out as much as you can about your person, but most of all have fun doing your research!