The document summarizes Peter Anyebe's research on developing precision in human resource management using conceptual models. It outlines two assumptions: perceiving existence beyond matter to include mind, soul and spirit; and shifting business emphasis from profit/loss to value creation. Models were derived to establish this conception, including the perception model of mind and standard procedure series. Key factors like thought pattern, behavior pattern, learning curve, productivity and leadership were determined. Metrics like the F-Scale, identity kit and bill of health index were developed for measurement. The research aims to put the right workforce in the right environment for profitable business results by quantifying concepts like commitment, character, learning and effort.

1. CONSULTANTS
8, De - Ba ng ler St.
P.O. Box 1243,
Gb oko
+ 234-808-080-2046
E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m
+234-703-430-2486
Agape Research:
The Final Word
By
Peter Anyebe
AGAPE
CONSULTANTS
2nd
September, 2015
HubPages
View
my profile
WordPress
Google Me
Google+
Website:
www.identi
tykit.biz
To the extent that a person is learned, LnG it would be
possible to predict the behavior pattern, ROI from the
thought pattern; f0 and to the extent that the person has
self-control, ScR it would be possible to determine the
capacities for productivity, Nu and leadership, Ps
Keywords: Feelings, Self-Control, Learning, Effort, Self-Containment, Engagement,
Retention, Skill, Productivity, Leadership, Competency, Influence

2. CONSULTANTS
8, De - Ba ng ler St.
P.O. Box 1243,
Gb oko
+ 234-808-080-2046
E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m
+234-703-430-2486
Agape Research:
The Final Word
By
Peter Anyebe
0.00 Preamble
At Agape Consultants, Gboko we set out in 1988 to achieve the following:
Put a value on people, C
Put a value on organizations, ROI and
Create the enabling environment, EB in which the value may be optimized
This derived from the desire to put the right workforce, C in the right environment,
EB and delivering profitable business results, ROI. In 2015, about 28 years later, we
have achieved as follows:
Put a value on people, according to the capacities for productivity and value
creation in terms of the monetized return on investment, ROI; as well as
leadership and the number of people they are able to influence
Put a value on the health of organizations, BHI according to their
profitability, sustainability, and sensitivity to the environment
Optimize both people and organizational value, to boost the culture, OrgC
and the business environment, EB
It is hoped that this would pave the way for a precise HR, like its nearest neighbor
accountancy, as well as engineering and architecture.

3. 1.0 Conceptualization
Precision required a recourse to first, 1st
principles, to understand the human person
in proper perspective. The following two, 2 assumptions were kernel to the
conception of the person:
A paradigm shift in which science would perceive existence beyond matter,
to include mind, soul, and spirit
Another paradigm shift in business, where the emphasis shifts from profit
and loss to value creation
In both cases, the alternative paradigms are inclusive of the former. An emphasis on
value creation would also ensure good profit. And the four, 4 realms of existence
also capture matter. For instance soul is conceptualized as the product of the mind,
which functions to create with inputs from spirit and matter. Diagrammatically:
Then the quality of soul would derive from the capacity of mind to interpret input
from spirit and matter, appropriately. Moreover, people are evaluated against the
capacity for effort; as it is applied to thought and at work, to distinguish between the
following three, 3 phenomena:
Thought Pattern, f0
Behavior Pattern, Po
Learning Curve, LnG
Given the learning curve, LnG the capacities for productivity ROI and leadership,
Nu would be determined. And the factors LnG, EfT, and EnG would represent
measures of intellect, will, and emotion respectively; all three, 3 of which are
components of mind. While effort, EfT is actually a measure of the commitment of
the will, engagement, EnG would be a measure of the co-operation from the
emotion, which could be disruptive sometimes. The emotion, A and the intellect, F

4. work together, to generate the feelings, L that combine to define the soul, S for A =
LF2
and S = 1/L where L = 1/A2 F2
. Equivalently the factors RtN, f0, and ScT work
together for optimum value creation, which translates into wealth in the form of
profits.
2.0 Actualization
The following models were derived to establish this conception:
The perception model of mind, PMM
The natural order, N-O
The standard procedure series, SPS
The character model
The 6-Metrics model
The productivity model
For measurement, the following models are kernel:
The F-Scale
The identity kit, Id-K
The bill of health index, BHI
The appraisal model, AppM
The self-containment model, ScT
The self-control model, ScR
By the PMM, at optimum, the mind would
reduce phenomena into the five, 5 essential
components that define being. These include
the three, 3 form features that define spirit;
and the two, 2 wave features that define
matter, for 3 + 2 = 5. But the typical SPS
comprises six, 6 items, which are a
reduction from the three, 3 form features,
according to the two, 2 wave features, for 3
x 2 = 6. Serially:
Work, L
Energy, F
Exhaust, A
3. Energy, F1 Phenomenon
2. Work, L2 6. Purpose, A2
1. Work, L1 5. Principle, A1
4. Energy, F2

5. In this case, the sixth, 6th
item defines the object that the procedure seeks to achieve,
while the other five, 5 items describe the object. And the N-O comprises four, 4
items according to the duality series in operations research presented below:
Maxima, F1
Minimax, L2
Maximin, L1
Minima, F2
These define the first, 1st
four, 4 items of the SPS, to predict the fifth, 5th
. The SPS is
actually the analogue of the N-O. While the N-O defines reality as it ought to be, the
personal order, P-O is a representation of the same reality, according to the person’s
perception of it. The F-Scale is a rendition of the SPS, so that the first, 1st
four, 4
items are scrambled to calibrate the scale. The subject that is measured unscrambles
the items, according to the person’s perception of them, to measure the P-O against
the N-O as the factor-f0 or objectivity, f0.
Following Einstein, thought is reduced into intuition, Pc and rationality, Rn.
Intuition is evaluated as the capacity for phenomenological compression, Pc where
phenomena are interpreted, to reduce them into the essentials that give being.
Rationality corroborates this action, to impose order on the items. The character
model outlines the form of these two, 2 concepts as follows:
Thus character, C would be established by the thought pattern, which predicts the
behavior pattern, as a function of the performance at task by the standard

6. procedure, n. The factor-n is evaluated on the organizational kit, Org-K which is
a reduction of the essential jobs that are performed in the organization into duties,
activities, and tasks. The procedures for the performance at these tasks are then
standardized for use in the analysis. Diagrammatically:
Given these three, 3 factors including Pc, Rn, and n; together with the accountant’s
measures of revenue, profit, and cost of materials, the 6-metrics are determined as
follows:
The factors C and OrgC are input to the appraisal model, to evaluate the factor-
ROIAPP; which is input to the model of self-containment, ScT.
It is from the 6-metrics that learning, LnG and effort, EfT are derived. The factors
f0, RtN, and ScT are measures of intellect, emotions, and feelings respectively;
which define the form of engagement, EnG to quantify the commitment, C’ of the
will. They explain how the will, through character, C affects the intellect and the
emotion, through LnG and EfT respectively. At optimum performance, learning and
effort would be reciprocals, for EfT = 1/LnG; which makes the emotion and the
intellect, inverses. Optimum performance here would be a reference to self-control, ScR.
Given:
1. Pc C
2. Rn
3. √n
1. Revenue
2. Profit BHI OrgC
3. Cost of Materials
F
f0
EB
ROIAPP
EmP
RtN
EnG
SkG
ScT
The right Workforce, in the right Environment,
Delivering profitable Business Results
6-Metrics Model

7. 3.0 Concluding
In all these, the work would be to put the emotion in the control of the intellect; so
that the feelings are normalized, to create a quality soul. This would be the
responsibility of the will, according to the person’s commitment to the task of soul
building. Ultimately, they would reduce phenomena to the four, 4 strategic
objectives, as evidence of optimum performance. By the productivity model,
commitment via the factor-C predicts productivity, according to the return on
investment, ROI. And optimum performance via the factor-f0 predicts leadership,
according to the approximation of the four, 4 strategic objectives, Nu.
In general, the following three, 3 features of the human person have been
highlighted, for form:
Leadership, L
Productivity, A and
Self-Control, F
These derive from the following fundamental assumptions:
Ultimately, the purpose of humanity and the universe would be, to build the
soul
But the body, which is material, would need to be sustained, for optimum
performance on the primary objective of soul building
The universe is designed to perturb humanity, into sharpening the intellect,
to gain control over the emotion
Recall that the human brain is designed so that
information reaches the emotion first, 1st
before it gets to
the intellect. And it is the emotion that is in touch with the
environment, together with all of its vagaries. Moreover
the physical environment is designed, following gravity
and relativity, to make the reconstruction of reality a
mirage. These have turned the elephantine emotion into
erratic and dominant forces, to be tamed by the skeletal
intellect, which must first, 1st
acquire the required energy. Given self-control therefore, a
certain amount of energy would be available to build the soul. This would be distributed
between productivity for sustenance, and leadership for soul building.

8. Appendix
The first, 1st
two,
2 of the eighteen,
18 subjects
satisfy the
requirements of
the productivity
model, with data
from the identity
kit, Id-Kit:
RES = RGT,
Nu → 4
Ps → 20%
When the
productivity
model is
combined with
the bill of health
index, BHI
which is
evaluated for
companies with
data from their
books; the same
two, 2 subjects
are predicted
When the
productivity model
is combined with
the bill of health
index, BHI, as well
as the self-control
model, the same
two, 2 subjects are
predicted