3. STUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Media Center, Nash Central High School
Tuesday, July 17, 2012, 6:00 pm
 Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward
 Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant
 Approval of Minutes from the June 25, 2012 Meeting (suspend until
next meeting)
 Committee Operating Procedure
 Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller, OREd
 Report to School Board - August 2012
 Questions?
Next Meeting
Scenario Discussion
TBD
3

4. Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools

5. Jan-Aug 2012 Aug - 2012 Aug – Dec 2012 August 2013
Committee Committee Public Input/ Community
Deliberations/ Recommendations Engagement Implementation
Monthly Reports to Presented to the
the School Board School Board Board of Education
Approval
5

6. Board of Public Engagement
Education
Committee Chairs
Technical Support
Community
Feedback Committee
ORED
Staff 6

7. Contiguous boundaries:
 Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using
satellite attendance areas.
Respect neighborhoods:
 Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified
“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other
guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major
highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.
Proximity to schools:
 While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest
school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating
school boundaries.
7

8. Modify feeder systems:
 In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each
site, consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would
allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on
mobile classrooms.
Stay within enrollment capacities:
 Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the
four high schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.
Consider anticipated growth:
 Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to
ensure that anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly
more than the others.
Enrollment balance:
 In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic
and economic populations at each middle and high school.
8

9.  February 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process
 March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data
 April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision
 May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
 June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
 June 25 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
 July 17 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
9

10.  Transparent
 Lines of Communications
 Committee Meetings
 Open to the public
 Website
 Information posted immediately after each meeting
 E-mail/ Phone Line
 An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has
been established to ensure seamless communication and to
make all information readily available to the public.
 A phone line has been established for those with limited or no
internet access to provide feedback to the committee.

11. Mike Miller, OREd
11

12.  Middle School Scenarios
 General Committee requests:
 Utilization, No feeder – MS 02, Rev. 1
 3 middle schools in Rocky Mount – MS 05, Rev.1
 Committee member requests:
 MS 04, Rev. 2
 Elementary School Scenario
 Minor adjustments to current zones
 Relief for Benvenue (currently at 111%)
12

13.  Committee Member Requests
 Scenario Revision Tools sent June 27
 Planning segment map
 Planning segment data table
 Documentation
13

14. 6-8 Student Count
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
NEW MS (RM HS
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash
site)
CURRENT 729 633 433 910 1099 0
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1) 703 653 282 808 847 511
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1) 488 625 353 888 932 518
(See data tables in handout.)

15. Utilization
140%
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
NEW MS (RM HS
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash
site)
CURRENT 88% 94% 78% 107% 129% 0%
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1) 94% 97% 51% 95% 100% 68%
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1) 65% 93% 63% 104% 110% 69%
Minority %
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
NEW MS (RM HS
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash
site)
CURRENT 78% 67% 88% 59% 51% 0%
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1) 66% 47% 96% 57% 56% 96%
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1) 71% 50% 98% 56% 54% 91%

16. Free/Reduced Lunch %
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
NEW MS (RM HS
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash
site)
CURRENT 73% 68% 78% 58% 64% 0%
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1) 66% 51% 87% 59% 69% 87%
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1) 66% 54% 91% 57% 67% 82%
80% Academic Proficiency %
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
NEW MS (RM HS
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash
site)
CURRENT 51% 54% 55% 69% 63% 0%
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1) 55% 71% 44% 68% 61% 44%
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1) 52% 68% 42% 69% 62% 49%

17.  Maximum Utilization: 110% (SNMS, MS 05 Rev.1, currently 129%)
 Minimum Utilization: 51% (Parker, MS 02 Rev.1, currently 78%)
 MS 02, Rev. 1: NCMS to 3 high schools, Edwards
and NEW to 2 high schools
 MS 05, Rev. 1: All clean feeder to high schools
except Edwards split to NCHS and RMHS
 Total Grade 6-8 students reassigned
 MS 02, Rev. 1: 1334
 MS 05, Rev. 1: 1276

18. CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 02, REV. 1
18

19. CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 05, REV. 1
19

20. K-5 Student Count
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
MB Red Winstea
Baskervi Benvenu Cedar Middles Nashvill Spring Willifor
Bailey Coopers Johnson Hubbar Pope Oak/Swi d/Engle
lle e Grove ex e Hope d
d ft Creek wood
CURRENT 620 341 743 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 583 550 437 1081
Scenario ES 02 620 372 688 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 581 550 437 1107
(See data tables in handout.)

21. Utilization
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
MB Red Winstea
Baskervi Benvenu Cedar Middles Nashvill Spring Willifor
Bailey Coopers Johnson Hubbar Pope Oak/Swi d/Engle
lle e Grove ex e Hope d
d ft Creek wood
CURRENT 93% 80% 111% 99% 104% 83% 96% 81% 104% 90% 72% 101% 75% 95%
Scenario ES 02 93% 87% 103% 99% 104% 83% 96% 81% 104% 90% 72% 101% 75% 98%
Minority %
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
MB Red Winstea
Baskervi Benvenu Cedar Middles Nashvill Spring Willifor
Bailey Coopers Johnson Hubbar Pope Oak/Swi d/Engle
lle e Grove ex e Hope d
d ft Creek wood
CURRENT 65% 98% 74% 52% 31% 100% 78% 59% 49% 99% 44% 51% 97% 64%
Scenario ES 02 65% 97% 74% 52% 31% 100% 78% 59% 49% 99% 43% 51% 97% 64%

22. Free/Reduced Lunch %
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
MB Red Winstea
Baskervi Benvenu Cedar Middles Nashvill Spring Willifor
Bailey Coopers Johnson Hubbar Pope Oak/Swi d/Engle
lle e Grove ex e Hope d
d ft Creek wood
CURRENT 71% 94% 68% 73% 47% 91% 70% 70% 52% 91% 46% 65% 92% 59%
Scenario ES 02 71% 92% 68% 73% 47% 91% 70% 70% 52% 91% 46% 65% 92% 60%
Academic Proficiency %
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Red Winstea
Baskervil Benvenu Cedar MB Middlese Spring
Bailey Coopers Johnson Nashville Pope Oak/Swi Williford d/Engle
le e Grove Hubbard x Hope
ft Creek wood
CURRENT 62% 45% 63% 73% 73% 38% 58% 61% 71% 35% 72% 60% 35% 61%
Scenario ES 02 62% 45% 64% 73% 73% 38% 58% 61% 71% 35% 72% 60% 35% 61%

23.  Impacting six elementary schools:
Benvenue, Baskerville, Red Oak/Swift Creek, and
Winstead/Englewood
 Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 71
 Benvenue utilization: 103% (currently 111%)

24. CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCENARIO ES 02
24

25.  Middle School Scenarios
 Committee requests
 Better utilization balance
 3 middle schools in Rocky Mount
 Member request MS 04, Rev. 2
 Elementary School Scenario
 Scenario ES 02
25

26. 26

27.  Further scenarios?
 Deadline for Committee member
requests: July 24, 2012
 How many options to present?
 “Packaging” the recommended scenarios?
Reminder: High-resolution review must be
performed by NRMPS Transportation Dept.
27

28. February 13 (4:00-5:30)
March 26 (6:00)
April 30 (6:00)
May 29 (6:00)
June 12 (6:00)
Tuesday June 25 (4:00–5:30)
Tuesday July 17 (6:00)
August - TBD

29. QUESTIONS