Template Building Workshop

Relink icon

1 4

1. From the Quark file, make sure all logos and graphics are in place.

Through InDesign CS2, convert the Quark to an InDesign file.
Use this converted InDesign file for reference only.

4. If any logos or graphics are missing or modified in the converted InDesign
file, navigate to where they reside using the Links palette “Relink” icon.
You can then use the screen below for the next missing graphic(s).
2

2. If any graphic files are missing you will see this message.
Click OK to repair the links in InDesign later.

3

3. If there are grouped or locked objects in the converted Quark
file you will see this message. Often there are warning messages
because of minor conversion issues.

Workshop 1 • Getting Started

7

5

7. Confirm all preferences including Baseline Grid.
Under Edit menu > Preferences > General, Type, etc.
5. Create a new, clean InDesign document which will be used as
a master template incorporating all swatches and most styles.
Under File > New > Document. Set specifications.

6

6. Save and name preset. Libraries
must be
8. Use only CMYK color swatches.
Each document will be one section of the publication. created
Delete any rgb swatches. in current
application
To prepare document you also need access to your live Quark and Word files
version
(suggest creating desktop shortcut for easier navigation). 8

Use real text, not dummy text (to later check paragraph styles and the
hyphenation & justification values within the paragraph styles).

Workshop 1 • Create the InDesign Document

Codes & Standards
Standard column configurations Non-printing layout margins & The Debate Over Circuit Breakers vs.
are created for whatever is columns for inside, outside, top
Fused Solutions Continues
present in the magazine: and bottom set to live area.
(2 col, 3 col, 2 + 3 col, etc.) Column numbers are set on By First Last, Italic Byline [c-s]

I
We use one text box with column individual master pages for have a number of reservations about the tech- ally take less total space than CB switchgear and
and gutter settings, rather than standard column configurations. nical issues in Mr. Lane’s articles, which broke be less expensive. The use of Class-J time-delay
down changes to the NEC and suggested fused current-limiting fuses may also reduce the size of
multiple threaded frames. Temporary guides are sometimes distribution may not always be necessary when equipment. What about the short-circuit rating
set to mark important guides, considering selective coordination requirements. of other components such as busway? How will
Both circuit breaker (CB) and fused systems they be affected by the short-delay trips? It is com-
such as for rules in column provide safe and reliable overcurrent protection mon in high-rise construction to run busway from
gutters, etc. when systems are carefully engineered, installed the main switchgear to distribution panels or to
and maintained. But there are significant differ- use plug-in busway to feed main-lug only (MLO)
ences that must be recognized. branch panels.
The first problem with all three articles is they do
(Subhead) unnecessary risks
not look at a complete system. The one-line diagram
in part two of the series, “The Skinny on Switchgear The same diagram shows an 800-amp CB with
and the New NEC,” (CSE 9/05, p.15), shows a feeder short delay trips protecting the automatic transfer
breaker in the main switchgear (not switchboard) of switch (ATS). Will the ATS have an adequate short-
800 amps, but neither the size of the main breaker circuit rating? One ATS manufacturer tests and UL
is indicated, nor whether there is a main breaker or lists its units only when protected by current-lim-
a sequence service. Is there coordination between iting fuses or CB with clearing times of less than
the 800-amp feeder breaker and the main breaker? three cycles. Generators commonly have short-n
To achieve this, the main breaker would require a is there. It is almost a knee-jerk response. While
short delay trip set at 12 cycles. The vast majority of some industries have planned shutdowns for ser-
transformers in commercial and industrial systems vice and maintenance purposes, commercial and
other industries seldom can do so except at late
hours. This , it should be included in every project
Considering only space, fused switchboards can
specification. To do less is to increase hazard to
take up less total space than CB switchgear, cost
personnel. No engineer can do so and meet the
less and require no need for rear access.
ethics of his profession.

Author Keith Lane responds: My intent was
are protected on the primary side by current-limiting
fuses. What would the coordination be? It’s difficult to solicit good conversation in the engineering
enough to coordinate CB having instantaneous trips community, which I think my article has succeeded
with primary current-limiting fuses. in doing. I am certainly not against AHJs adopting
If the primary fuses open—admittedly, this rarely the 2005 NEC. The heart of the piece was the issue
happens—the system is down until the utility replac- of selective coordination but neither the size of the
es the fuses, and only after determining there is no main breaker is indicated, nor whether there is a
problem in the transformer or main switchgear. main breaker or a sequence service. Is there coor-
Any facility requiring an 800-amp CB for the dination between the 800-amp feeder breakerAs
emergency system must be fairly large. It is reason- noted in my conclusion, I am in favor of good
able to assume a 2.5% impedance high-efficiency engineering analysis, which would include a com-
1,500- or 2,000-kVA transformer. Available short- prehensive fault current calculation, coordination
circuit current could easily be more than 75,000 study and appropriate settinehensive fault current
amps. What is the cost of CB switchgear-type con- analysis, priate setting of the breakers or with the

Workshop 1 • Master page A with 2 column configuration, baseline grid and live text for mockup
struction opposed to a bolted pressure switch and use of fused distribution, the reliability of electrical
fuse switchboard? Considering only space, fused distribution systems would be increased over what
switchboards are readily available. They may actu- is required by the NEC prior to 2005.

A
Consulting-Specifying Engineer • MONTH, 2006

Codes & Standards Codes & Standards
It was quite obvious that the contrac- ing the contractor’s work. that the contractor is responsible for the It was quite obvious that the contrac- ing the contractor’s work. that the contractor is responsible for the
tor had installed bolts that were too But let’s return in time to the methods and materials of constructing tor had installed bolts that were too But let’s return in time to the methods and materials of constructing
short to fully engage the threads of the developer’s initial concern about the struc- the project. But as soon as an engineer short to fully engage the threads of the developer’s initial concern about the struc- the project. But as soon as an engineer
nut. While on the site, the engineer also tural connection. The engineer observes states, even in ambiguous terms, that the nut. While on the site, the engineer also tural connection. The engineer observes states, even in ambiguous terms, that the
noted that the stucco lath and moisture the same condition, but this time offers work is “complete,” he or she has joined noted that the stucco lath and moisture the same condition, but this time offers work is “complete,” he or she has joined
barrier operations had been completed. a substantially different report about the right in on the responsib. Designers and barrier operations had been completed. a substantially different report about the right in on the responsib. Designers and
In his follow-up report of the site visit, stucco: “Stucco lath and moisture barrier specifiers should maintain strict control In his follow-up report of the site visit, stucco: “Stucco lath and moisture barrier specifiers should maintain strict control
the engineer cited the bolting deficiency, work appears complete. Since structural over the actual duties that they assume, the engineer cited the bolting deficiency, work appears complete. Since structural over the actual duties that they assume,
with a correction, and also wrote that integrity of the building depends on the and they should avoid even the appear- with a correction, and also wrote that integrity of the building depends on the and they should avoid even the appear-
“the stucco cladding paper and lath is fastener use and placement for positive ance of approving an owner’s. By simply “the stucco cladding paper and lath is fastener use and placement for positive ance of approving an owner’s. By simply
complete, ready for the scratch coat.” attachment to the frame, it is strongly adding, “The Owner should verify with complete, ready for the scratch coat.” attachment to the frame, it is strongly adding, “The Owner should verify with
This report became a key issue in the case recommended that you verify through the equipment manufacturer’s represen- This report became a key issue in the case recommended that you verify through the equipment manufacturer’s represen-
against the designer, as the structural the building department or a deputy tative that all connecr this application,” against the designer, as the structural the building department or a deputy tative that all connecr this application,”
design allowed for the stucco cladding to inspector that the details of the specifi- the engineer places responsibility better design allowed for the stucco cladding to inspector that the details of the specifi- the engineer places responsibility better
participate in the building’s lateral force cations were faithfully adhered to.” informed and in a better position where participate in the building’s lateral force cations were faithfully adhered to.” informed and in a better position where
resistance system. The engineer has just directed the it belongs—back with the owner. resistance system. The engineer has just directed the it belongs—back with the owner.
Two years later, when cracks in the owner or developer to verify compliance Two years later, when cracks in the owner or developer to verify compliance
Recommendations Recommendations
stucco and other collateral finishes were with some other entity and has pointed stucco and other collateral finishes were with some other entity and has pointed
observed, it was determined by forensic out that it is a critical component of the The use of “recommendation” lan- observed, it was determined by forensic out that it is a critical component of the The use of “recommendation” lan-
experts that the attachment of the lath building’s design. Thus, the liability has guage cannot be emphasized enough, experts that the attachment of the lath building’s design. Thus, the liability has guage cannot be emphasized enough,
to the wood frame employed staples that been kept in the lap of the owner. The not only for observation reports of site vis- to the wood frame employed staples that been kept in the lap of the owner. The not only for observation reports of site vis-
were too short, and that the fastener same use of “recommendations” can its, but also certificates for payment and were too short, and that the fastener same use of “recommendations” can its, but also certificates for payment and
spacing exceeded the design specifica- written requests spacing exceeded the design specifica- written requests
tions. Essentially, the weight of the stucco for information tions. Essentially, the weight of the stucco for information
Considering only space, fused switchboards can Considering only space, fused switchboards can
exceeded the capacity of the fasteners from the contrac- exceeded the capacity of the fasteners from the contrac-
take up less total space than CB switchgear, cost take up less total space than CB switchgear, cost
to secure it to the frame. The engineer’s tors. By including to secure it to the frame. The engineer’s tors. By including
less and require no need for rear access. less and require no need for rear access.
written report of observation was inter- a recommenda- written report of observation was inter- a recommenda-
preted by the developer’s attorney as an tion to verify, preted by the developer’s attorney as an tion to verify,
endorsement of the contractor’s adher- charge the owner to seek verification confirm, validate appropriate, design endorsement of the contractor’s adher- charge the owner to seek verification confirm, validate appropriate, design
ence to the structural design. from the contractor, thus asserting that professionals place themselves one step ence to the structural design. from the contractor, thus asserting that professionals place themselves one step
Attorneys for the developer cited the the engineer’s observation was not an further from the inevitable dispute. The Attorneys for the developer cited the the engineer’s observation was not an further from the inevitable dispute. The
field report, indicating that it provided inspection. More importantly, it estab- following is a suggested checklist: field report, indicating that it provided inspection. More importantly, it estab- following is a suggested checklist:
a representation that all of the work lishes that inspection of the work is out- ● Limit observations and report lan- a representation that all of the work lishes that inspection of the work is out- ● Limit observations and report lan-

observed by the engineer was consistent side of the engineer’s scope. guage to the purpose o. observed by the engineer was consistent side of the engineer’s scope. guage to the purpose o.
with industry practices and wisdom. They The key to this area of practice is to ● Limit oral conversations with the with industry practices and wisdom. They The key to this area of practice is to ● Limit oral conversations with the

argued that the engineer’s comment be always mindful of the duty that one contractor to basic items. Follow low up argued that the engineer’s comment be always mindful of the duty that one contractor to basic items. Follow low up
that “...the stucco cladding paper and can end up assuming as a result of a substantive questions every report or that “...the stucco cladding paper and can end up assuming as a result of a substantive questions every report or
lath is complete” additionally inferred, simple conversation or a brief written written oral conversation. lath is complete” additionally inferred, simple conversation or a brief written written oral conversation.
“...according to building codes and my memo. Once again, although the case ● Include “recommendations to verify” “...according to building codes and my memo. Once again, although the case ● Include “recommendations to verify”

specs.” The court agreed and held that no involved a structural design issue, the in every report or written correspondence specs.” The court agreed and held that no involved a structural design issue, the in every report or written correspondence
other individual was better informed and same practice should be incorporated dealing with contractor rify through the other individual was better informed and same practice should be incorporated dealing with contractor rify through the
in a better position to observe a defect into the standard policies of all disciplines building department or a deputy inspec- in a better position to observe a defect into the standard policies of all disciplines building department or a deputy inspec-
in the application of the lath than the of engineering. Designers and specifiers tor that performance. in the application of the lath than the of engineering. Designers and specifiers tor that performance.
engineer. The engineer was found by the should maintain strict control over the ● Follow up in writing, asking the engineer. The engineer was found by the should maintain strict control over the ● Follow up in writing, asking the

court to have contributed substantially to actual duties that they assume, and they owner/developer if their verification of court to have contributed substantially to actual duties that they assume, and they owner/developer if their verification of
the failures of the stucco attac ures of the should avoid even the appearance of the work confirmed compliance by the the failures of the stucco attac ures of the should avoid even the appearance of the work confirmed compliance by the
stucco attachment. approving an owner’s and contractor’s contractor, manufacturer or fabricator. stucco attachment. approving an owner’s and contractor’s contractor, manufacturer or fabricator.
work. Otherwise, the other players in ● Limit the construction-phase services work. Otherwise, the other players in ● Limit the construction-phase services

Avoiding risk Avoiding risk
the construction drama will be delighted wherever possible. The project rarely has the construction drama will be delighted wherever possible. The project rarely has
How could this liability risk have been to hand the engineer their responsibili- a sufficient budget to allow for detailed How could this liability risk have been to hand the engineer their responsibili- a sufficient budget to allow for detailed
avoided? It’s all about duty. In this situa- ties and receive the endorsement of the verification of design compliance. avoided? It’s all about duty. In this situa- ties and receive the endorsement of the verification of design compliance.

Workshop 1 • Master page B with 3 column configuration, baseline grid and live text for mockup
tion, the engineer snatched liability away design professional for the work they The key to this area of practice is to tion, the engineer snatched liability away design professional for the work they The key to this area of practice is to
from the contractor and the developer by have just completed. The construction be always mins a result conversation or from the contractor and the developer by have just completed. The construction be always mins a result conversation or
voluntarily assuming the duty of evaluat- industry has established the standard a brief written memo. Once again, voluntarily assuming the duty of evaluat- industry has established the standard a brief written memo. Once again,

B
B Consulting-Specifying Engineer • MONTH, 2006

Codes & Standards
p-style c-style
Section Bold Section

The Debate Over Circuit Breakers vs.
p-style
Head

ByLine [p-styLe], Italic Byline [c-style]

I
p-style
have a number of reservations about the tech- ally take less total space than CB switchgear and
Text DropCap
nical issues in Mr. Lane’s articles, which broke be less expensive. The use of Class-J time-delay
[nested DropCap]
down changes to the NEC and suggested fused current-limiting fuses may also reduce the size of
distribution may not always be necessary when equipment. What about the short-circuit rating
considering selective coordination requirements. of other components such as busway? How will
Both circuit breaker (CB) and fused systems they be affected by the short-delay trips? It is com-
provide safe and reliable overcurrent protection mon in high-rise construction to run busway from
p-style
when systems are carefully engineered, installed the main switchgear to distribution panels or to
Text
and maintained. But there are significant differ- use plug-in busway to feed main-lug only (MLO)
p-style
ences that must be recognized. branch panels.
Subhead
The first problem with all three articles is they do
not look at a complete system. The one-line diagram
in part two of the series, “The Skinny on Switchgear The same diagram shows an 800-amp CB with
and the New NEC,” (CSE 9/05, p.15), shows a feeder short delay trips protecting the automatic transfer
breaker in the main switchgear (not switchboard) of switch (ATS). Will the ATS have an adequate short-
800 amps, but neither the size of the main breaker circuit rating? One ATS manufacturer tests and UL
is indicated, nor whether there is a main breaker or lists its units only when protected by current-lim-
a sequence service. Is there coordination between iting fuses or CB with clearing times of less than
the 800-amp feeder breaker and the main breaker? three cycles. Generators commonly have short-n
To achieve this, the main breaker would require a is there. It is almost a knee-jerk response. While
short delay trip set at 12 cycles. The vast majority of some industries have planned shutdowns for ser-
transformers in commercial and industrial systems vice and maintenance purposes, commercial and
other industries seldom can do so except at late
p-style
p-style hours. This , it should be included in every project
Considering only space, fused switchboards can Text
PullQuote specification. To do less is to increase hazard to
c-style
personnel. No engineer can do so and meet the
Bold Text
ethics of his profession.

Author Keith Lane responds: My intent was
are protected on the primary side by current-limiting
fuses. What would the coordination be? It’s difficult to solicit good conversation in the engineering
enough to coordinate CB having instantaneous trips community, which I think my article has succeeded
with primary current-limiting fuses. in doing. I am certainly not against AHJs adopting
If the primary fuses open—admittedly, this rarely the 2005 NEC. The heart of the piece was the issue
happens—the system is down until the utility replac- of selective coordination but neither the size of the
es the fuses, and only after determining there is no main breaker is indicated, nor whether there is a
problem in the transformer or main switchgear. main breaker or a sequence service. Is there coor-
Any facility requiring an 800-amp CB for the dination between the 800-amp feeder breakerAs
emergency system must be fairly large. It is reason- noted in my conclusion, I am in favor of good
able to assume a 2.5% impedance high-efficiency engineering analysis, which would include a com-
1,500- or 2,000-kVA transformer. Available short- prehensive fault current calculation, coordination
circuit current could easily be more than 75,000 study and appropriate settinehensive fault current
amps. What is the cost of CB switchgear-type con- analysis, priate setting of the breakers or with the

Workshop 2 • RBI Paragraph & Character Styles for Master page A
struction opposed to a bolted pressure switch and use of fused distribution, the reliability of electrical
fuse switchboard? Considering only space, fused distribution systems would be increased over what
switchboards are readily available. They may actu- is required by the NEC prior to 2005.

A

Codes & Standards
p-style c-style
Section Bold Section

p-style
Head

c-style ByLine [p-styLe], Italic Byline [c-style]
BoldItalics
NotesEditor Editor’s note: This month’s Codes & Standards, following the tone set in Letters (p.7), is an in-depth rebut-
[nested]
tal to Keith Lane’s August-through-October series analyzing the 2005 edition of the NEC. A response from Mr.
p-style Lane follows. It should be noted that Lane’s original article was run in three parts because of length.
NotesEditor

I
have a number of reservations about the tech- size of the main breaker is indicated, nor whether
p-style
Text DropCap
nical issues in Mr. Lane’s articles, which broke there is a main breaker or a sequence service. Is
[nested DropCap]
down changes to the NEC and suggested fused there coordination between the 800-amp feeder
distribution may not always be necessary when breaker and the main breaker? To achieve this, the
considering selective coordination requirements. main breaker would require a short delay trip set
Both circuit breaker (CB) and fused systems at 12 cycles. The vast majority of transformers in
provide safe and reliable overcurrent protection commercial and industrial systems are protected
p-style
when systems are carefully engineered, installed on the primary side by current-limiting fuses. What
Text
and maintained. But there are significant differ- would the coordination be? It’s difficult enough
ences that must be recognized. to coordinate CB having instantaneous trips with
p-style
The first problem with all three articles is they primary current-limiting fuses.
Subhead

p-style (Subhead) unnecessary risks
PullQuote The same diagram shows an 800-amp CB with
short delay trips protecting the automatic trans-
fer switch (ATS). Will the ATS have an adequate
short-there is no problem in the transformer or
do not look at a complete system. The one-line main switchgmp fault on the load side of a branch
diagram in part two of the series, “The Skinny on breaker may cause all three CBs to open. If power
Switchgear and the New NEC,” (CSE 9/05, p.15), look? After the fa removed, the switches and CBs
shows a feeder breaker in the main switchgear trical distribution systems would be increased over
(not switchboard) of 800 amps, but neither the what is required by the NEC prior to 2005.

p-style
GraphicCaption

1,250-hp, 3600-rpm, 2,300-volt, WP-1 enclosure, constant-speed motor drives an aeration blower at Weyerhaeuser’s
Longview Complex.

Workshop 2 • RBI Paragraph & Character Styles for optional Master Page A
A

Codes & Standards
element label
Section

element label
Head

element label
Byline
Editor’s note: This month’s Codes & Standards, following the tone set in Letters (p.7), is an in-depth rebut-
element label
Intro
Lane follows. It should be noted that Lane’s original article was run in three parts because of length.

I
element label
nical issues in Mr. Lane’s articles, which broke there is a main breaker or a sequence service. Is
Body
considering selective coordination requirements. main breaker would require a short delay trip set
Both circuit breaker (CB) and fused systems at 12 cycles. The vast majority of transformers in
provide safe and reliable overcurrent protection commercial and industrial systems are protected
element label
Graphic

element label (Subhead) unnecessary risks
Accurate element labels must be included for all text and Pullquote The same diagram shows an 800-amp CB with
graphic frames. Under Window > Show Element Labels short delay trips protecting the automatic trans-
(this feature for Smart Connection Enterprise rollout). short-there is no problem in the transformer or
Do not group frames because element labels will be disgarded. diagram in part two of the series, “The Skinny on breaker may cause all three CBs to open. If power

element label
Graphic

element label
Caption

Longview Complex.

Workshop 2 • RBI Element labels for Smart Connection Enterprise
A

p-style

Codes & Standards
Section
c-style
FIlE PREPaRaTIoN FoR E-loGIC REvIEw
Bold Section
element label
1. Review ALL documents with art director and CMS prior to e-Logic review. Section

2. All mockups will be sent to e-Logic with complete paragraph and character
styles and element labels in place.
3. Suggest locking frames on Master Pages that don’t move, such as a folio or Fused Solutions Continues
section name.
4. With all document pages highlighted in pages palette, Override All Master
Page Items on document pages for e-Logic review. Pages palette > Fly out Editor’s note: This month’s Codes & Standards, following the tone set in Letters (p.7), is an in-depth rebut-
menu > Override All Master Page Items (Alt+Shift-Ctr+L). This must be Lane follows. It should be noted that Lane’s original article was run in three parts because of length.
done because e-Logic reviews document pages, not master pages.

I
5. Make revisions as required by e-Logic report. nical issues in Mr. Lane’s articles, which broke there is a main breaker or a sequence service. Is
Save and keep all documents with live text (mockup) prior to stripping out the considering selective coordination requirements. main breaker would require a short delay trip set
text. These files are the ones that get sent to e-Logic, with complete paragraph Both circuit breaker (CB) and fused systems at 12 cycles. The vast majority of transformers in
and character styles and element labels in place. provide safe and reliable overcurrent protection commercial and industrial systems are protected
4

The same diagram shows an 800-amp CB with
short delay trips protecting the automatic trans-
short-there is no problem in the transformer or
diagram in part two of the series, “The Skinny on breaker may cause all three CBs to open. If power

4

Longview Complex.

Workshop 3 • Mockup to art director, CMS, e-Logic for review
A

Codes & Standards
aFTER DoCumENT aPPRoval By E-loGIC CREaTE THE aCTual TEmPlaTE 3

1. In each master page, create dummy text in all frames—dummy text is
the actual name of the style sheet used (text is stripped out except for
style names).
Head
2
2. Examples: in the head frame you would type Head; in the Byline
frame type Byline, Italic Byline [c-style]; in the NotesEditor frame type
NotesEditor; in the body frame type Text DropCap, Text, Subhead, etc. 2 ByLine [p-styLe], Italic Byline [c-style]
(using the appropriate paragraph styles, see samples).
Editor’s note: NotesEditor
3. There are some exceptions such as the name of the Section and Editor’s
Note (a nested c-style), which don’t change. In these cases—when the 3 2

T

text doesn’t change—leave the live text intact. 2 ext DropCap
Text
4. Document pages must be revised to the format of the updated Master
Pages. Subhead
Text
5. All templates will have complete paragraph and character styles and
element labels in place.

PullQuote PullQuote

Save and keep all documents with live text (mockup) prior to stripping out the
text. These files are the ones that get sent to e-Logic, with complete paragraph
and character styles and element labels in place.

Remember,
InDesign
has
unlimited
undos
(ctr-z)

GraphicCaption

Workshop 3 • Create actual template
A

Template Building Workshop

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (12)

Similar to Template Building Workshop

Similar to Template Building Workshop (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Template Building Workshop