3. RANK COUNTRY SCORE
ABOUT THE INDEX
1 New Zealand 9.5
2 Denmark 9.4 The Index ranks countries according to their
3 Finland 9.4 perceived levels of public-sector corruption.
4 Sweden 9.3 The 2011 index draws of 13 different
5 Singapore 9.2 assessments and business opinion surveys
……. carried out 10 independent and reputable
18 UK 7.8 institutions.
Perception are used because corruption-
……
whether frequency of amount – is difficult to
24 USA 7.1
measure.
…….
75 China 3.6
……… Measuring scandals, investigations or
120 Mongolia 2.7 prosecutions, while offering ‘non-perception’
…….. data, reflect less on the prevalence of
143 Russia 2.4 corruption in a country and more on other
factors, such as freedom of the press or the
efficiency of the judicial system.
4. Public outcry at corruption, impunity and economic instability
sent shockwaves around the world in 2011. Protests in many
countries quickly spread to unite people from all parts of society.
Their backgrounds may be diverse, but their message is the
same: more transparency and accountability is needed from our
leaders.
The 2011 CPI shows that No region or country in the world is
immune to the damages of corruption, the vast majority of the
183 countries and territories assessed score below five on a
scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 10 (very clean.)
Perceptions are used because corruption is to a great extent a
hidden activity that is difficult to measure. Over time,
perceptions have proved to be a reliable estimate of corruption.
Public sector governance that puts the interests of its citizens
first is a responsibility that transcends borders. Governments
must act accordingly. For their part, citizens need to continue
demanding better performance from their leaders.
5. Legislative branch of government =Legally
Executive branch of government
Judiciary
Public sector
Law enforcement – хууль сахиулах
Electoral management body
Ombudsman =a government appointee who investigates complaints by private
persons against the government
Audit institution
Anti-corruption agencies
Political parties
Media
Civil society
Business
6. Research papers published in 2007 and 2008 examined the economic consequences
of corruption perception, as defined by the CPI.
The researchers found a correlation between a higher CPI and lower long-term
economic growth, as well as a decrease in GDP growth of 2.4% for every unit
increase in a country's CPI score.
Also shown was a power-law dependence linking higher CPI score to lower rates of
foreign investment in a country.
7. The Bribe Payers Index is a unique tool capturing
the supply side of international bribery,
specifically focussing on bribes paid by the
8.
9. The Corruption Perceptions Index ranks countries
based on the degree to which corruption is perceived to
exist in the public sector. The Bribe Payers Index ranks
countries based on the likelihood of companies
headquartered in that country to bribe abroad.
The BPI draws on Bribe Payers Survey of business
executives, while the CPI draws on external data sources,
which include other business surveys, commercial risk
assessments and other country experts both within and
outside the country.
The CPI and BPI scores do however correlate strongly
with each other, demonstrating the relationship between
different forms of corruption within a country.
10. Main organ for corruption
perception in Mongolia is IAAC /ATG/.
Yearly budget from the government
for the IAAC was US $300,000 in , and
increased to US $1,65 million in 2007
years.
The Mongolia has 3.0 ball by the
CPI in 2007 year.
