2. Pre- production work flow.
The pre- production work flow was average. W all worked together
, e
reallywell and it was great fun doing so. The fact that we all had
brilliant ideas and shared themwith each other in a veryprofessional
way we listened to each other and took everyidea into consideration.
,
W worked well together bycontributing ideas to the story
e , boards and
screenplay However we did all do a story
s. board each individuallyto
see what each others approach to the film process would be, we did
ing
this to see how each other worked. W didn’t want to look at the other
e
group m bers story
em board until theywere finished.
This is because once theywere done,
we picked out aspects that we thought
were good fromall three of the story board
plans, and created one new one with
every one’s contribution and planning.
3. What went well?
The teamwork elem of the
ent
preliminarytask went reallywell, we
all m sure that every
ade one knew
exactlywhat was happening, what to
do and how we were going to do it.
W wanted to m sure that all of
e ake
the group were okaywith what was
happening. The fact that we all
shared the sam kind of ideas was
e
reallyhelpful, we all respect each
other and their opinions and
thoughts. Our teacher Mr Henton
,
reallyhelped us, byallowing us to
use his car in a part of our
preliminarytask.
4. What could have gone better?
W should have taken less tim in the
e e
planning stage of our prelim inary
task, becuase we didn't plan the tim e
verywell it m that we com
ent prim ised
on finaliseing elem ents that we
would've liked to have in the
prelim inarytask. This would have
m eant that we could have included
m things such as SFX m up for
ore ake
a better look, and finding an em pty
roomfor our film ing. The reason we
took so long was because we were
planning to include m scenes. W
ore e
were planning to m it m
ake ore
detailed but planning is what cost us
our m uch needed detials we took so
long to get every thing sorted.
5. What technology did you use?
W didn't reallyhave access or
e
knowledge for the use of a wider
range of technology however the
,
technologywe used in our
prelim inarytask was an iP the
ad
film we done was with a
ing
programP hoto Booth, designed
byApple for us on iP ads, iPhones
and other apple products. This
technologywas sim and easyto
ple
use, to connect the iP with the
ad
com puters we used a USB lead to
easilyget the film onto the
s
com puter for editing.
6. What did you learn?
During the film of our prelim
ing inary
task I learnt that cam angles are
era
every thing in filming, if I was to do
this task again then I would definitely
concentrate m on the different
ore
angles that we used. The technology
we used to edit our prelim inarytask,
was iMovie. This programworked
extrem well, it was so sim and
ely ple
easyto use. Mycom pleted and edited
prelim inarytask m eets the criteria
well, we included all of the shots that
were required of us, a couple of these
were the, Two Shot and Match on
Action, and we onlyused m usic that
we m fromsounds effects provided
ade
with the iMovie program .
7. Overall.
Overall I amextrem happywith
ity
the final edited prelim inarytask, we
worked verywell as a teamI would
love to do it again. The work flow
was good, but I think if I was to do
it again I would spend less tim e
finalising an idea at the beginning,
and just work through it on the way
during the film process. I am
ing
happythat I m som m
ade e istakes,
because this wayI can learn from
themfor future projects. I have
learnt a lot fromthis project.
