1. Oral
His/Herstory
Write-­‐Up
Rubric
100 pts total
EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE FAIR
INTRODUCTION Introduction to write up explains
who is being presented, how they
conducted the interview and the
way that they will be presenting
and why
Short introduction, but
does set up who is being
presented.
Introduction does not
relate to presentation.
No introduction to
presentation.
QUALITY OF
INFORMATION
Information clearly represents the
interview including major events
and details of their life.
Information represents the
interview but presentation
did not include major
events or small details of
their life.
Information represents the
interview but missing
major events and details.
Information did not
have any major events
or details of the
interview.
CONTENT
DEPTH -
COMPLEXITY
in-depth; well supported;
develops complex concepts and
relationships, beyond expected
level; analyzes multiple
perspectives and issues, abstract
thinking.
Covers topic effectively;
well developed; explores
the topic beyond facts and
details; critical thinking
evident; compares and
contrasts.
Valid content but little
depth or elaboration;
sparse information and
presentation, simple, basic
information; limited critical
thinking is evident.
Needs more information
or more accurate
information, information
was insufficient or
irrelevant, very simple.
USE OF QUOTES
FROM
READINGS
Write-up integrated 1 quote from
EACH reading (Week 1 & 2). Full
quote sandwiches are present
and connect smoothly with the
other content in the write-up
2 quotes (one from each
reading) were integrated
into the write-up. Quote
sandwiches may be a bit
awkwardly integrated.
2 quotes are present, but
quote sandwich is either
not complete or not clear.
1 quote is integrated, or
quotes are present but
are not clearly
connected or
introduced.
SUMMARY OF
COOPERATION
Works well with partner. Sharing
and using others ideas. Equal
time given to both presenters. The
cooperative work is clearly
documented and explained. This
will be evaluated through your
individual summaries which
highlights the work that your
partner you have each
contributed.
Worked well together and
shared ideas, but one did
most of the presenting.
This will be evaluated
through your individual
summaries which
highlights the work that
your partner you have
each contributed.
Somewhat cooperative,
but still seemed to do it
their own way. This will be
evaluated through your
individual summaries
which highlights the work
that your partner you have
each contributed.
Completely un-cooperative.
This will be
evaluated through your
individual summaries
which highlights the
work that your partner
you have each
contributed.