Academic Grading Criteria F o rm a t (3 0 % ) Presentation and report format to prescribed AIM standard. Demonstration of wide reading and inclusion of requisite references in Harvard reference style. Academic writing appropriate to postgraduate level of study. Clearly articulated. Within required word count. Well structured, logical flow to argument C o n c e p ts (2 0 % ) Demonstration of knowledge of concepts. Concepts support the argument or recommendations being made. P ra c tic a l A p p lic a tio n (2 0 % ) Demonstrates practical application of concepts Workplace-related examples support the argument or recommendations made. A n a ly tic T h in k in g (2 0 % ) Demonstration of analytical thinking in relation to concepts. Demonstration of analytical thinking in relation to workplace examples R e cc o m e n d a ti o n s ( 1 0 % ) Recommendations well articulated and clearly drawn from analysis. Total .