SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 27
On the way to a Relation Registry for ISOcat data categories Irina Nevskaya – Frankfurt University Menzo Windhouwer – MPI for Psycholinguistics 10/10/2011 1 RELISH meets LOEWE
Outline Introduction to ISOcat data categories Relations in ISOcat RELISH and ISOcat Introduction to Relation Registry RELcat 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 2
A glimpse of ISOcat 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 3
ISOcat data categories ISOcat is a Data Category Registry (DCR) an implementation of ISO 12620:2009 A data category is  the result of the specification of a given data field an elementary descriptor in a linguistic structure or an annotation scheme 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 4
Goal: semantic interoperability 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 5 partOfSpeech Lemma writtenForm writtenForm Word Form grammaticalGender lexicalType grammaticalGender wordOrder Lexicon 1..* A (schema for a) typological database Lexical Entry Shared semantics! 0..* 1..* Form Sense 0..* A (schema for a) LMF lexicon
Data category types 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 6 open constrained complex: closed writtenForm grammaticalGender email string string string Constraint: .+@.+ neuter feminine masculine simple:
Data category types 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 7 lexicalResource container: globalInformation lexicon language alphabet lexicalEntry japanese ipa lemma writtenForm
Data category relationships 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 8 Value domain membership Subsumption relationships between simple data categories (legacy) Relationships between complex/container data categories are not stored in ISOcat … … but can be stored in RELcat, a Relation Registry partOfSpeech string pronoun personal pronoun
No relationships in ISOcat? 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 9 Rationale:  Relation types and modeling strategies for a given data category may differ from application to application; Motivation to agree on relation and modeling strategies will be stronger at individual application level; Integration of multiple relation structures in DCR itself could lead to endless ontological clutter.
RELISH and ISOcat 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 10
Harmonization of Terminology between GOLD and the ISO Data Category Registry in the RELISH project The ILIT team created a suitable transformation of the concepts of the GOLD ontology into data categories.  The team in Frankfurt (FRA) has created an MDF data category selection. These data category selections (GOLD and MDF) have been made public. By mapping on the ISOcat data categories, a harmonization of the used semantic categories should be achieved. A chart with interrelations between the MDF, GOLD and standard ISOcat data categories was created; types of relations between the categories were established to be implemented in the Relation Registry and in mapping the categories in the process of lexicon import into LEXUS as well as into RELISH-LIFT interchange formats. 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 11
Problems encountered by an attempt of mapping MDF categories are mostly complex ones. They contain a language property (value): - v - vernacular - e – English - n – national - r – regional GOLD and „standard“ ISOcats do not contain a language property GOLD and „standard“ ISOcats are thought of more as concepts, not as their concrete realizations 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 12
Types of relations between the MDF, GOLD and standard ISOcat data categories sameAs: MDF-ISOcat “gloss” (DC-3711) is sameAs the ISOcat “gloss” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-244 almostSameAs: MDF-ISOcat “gloss national” (DC-3711) is almostSameAs the ISOcat “gloss” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-244 partOf: The MDF-ISOcat “Gloss (national)” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3711combines 1) the ISOcat “gloss” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-244, 2) the MDF-ISOcat „national language” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3702 They have, thus the relation partOf the MDF-ISOcat “Gloss (national)” 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 13
Does the name of the category help to find a match? The names can be completely different, but the same phenomena are meant:  ,[object Object]
The MDF “Borrowed word (loan)“ (DC-3688) is sameAs the standard ISOcat “source language” (DC-2494)10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 14
Does the name of the category help to find a match? The names can coincide, but different phenomena are meant: - The MDF ISO category “citation form (vernacular)”, defined as “a form for representing a lexeme” (DC-3716) should not be confused with the GOLD category “citation”. The GOLD category is defined as “The action of citing or quoting any words or written passage from a publication that allows others to locate and identify the original source. Typical details include the title, author's name, the journal title (for articles), publication date and page numbers used in research.” The MDF ISO category is almostSameAs the ISOcat "sort key" (DC-469), defined as “a form for sorting a printed dictionary”. 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 15
Various relations between „standard“categories in the ISOcat Data Registry No generic term in the standard set of ISO categories: - In the ISOcats registry, there is no generic term “date”, but a number of more specific “date” terms:  “origination date”: http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-166 “check date”: http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-126 “creation date” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2251 “importation date”: http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-265 “modification date”: http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-365 etc. The MDF category “date” (DC-365) marks both the date of the data creation and the date of the data modification. 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 16
Various relations between „standard“categories in the ISO cat Data Registry Polysemy of the categories: MDF-ISOcat “gloss” (DC-3707) is almostSameAs the ISOcat “gloss” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-244 only in its first meaning: “In TEI: A phrase or word used to provide a gloss or definition for some other word or phrase. In 1951: Any editorial comment.” 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 17
Various relations between „standard“categories in the ISOcat Data Registry Synonymy of the categories: - The ISOcat “etymology” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-221 is sameAsto the ISOcat “etymological root” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1987 - The ISOcat „comment“ http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1846 issameAsto the ISOcat “note” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-382 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 18
RELcat a Relation Registry 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 19
Relation Registry Stores typed relationships between data categories: ISOcat, Dublin Core, … concepts: GOLD, … Sets of relationships are owned by individuals or groups no standardization effort can be combined might need conflict resolution can use their own vocabulary hookup into a core taxonomy of relation types Exploitation: Various levels of semantic search CMDI metadata search CMDRSB 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 20
RELcat An implementation of a Relation Registry Based on a RDF quad store, SPARQL (and RDFS Plus) Status: read-only backend in alpha stage Upload of relations by admin Available sets Metadata: CMDI and Dublin Core http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/relcat/set/cmdi http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/relcat/set/dc RELISH: RELISH and GOLD http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/relcat/set/relish http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/relcat/set/gold Representations: .rdf .trig .svg .png … Queries on multiple sets are supported Misses: UI, reasoner, handling of same-as cliques, … 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 21
Relationship types rel:related rel:sameAs(symmetric and transitive) rel:almostSameAs(symmetric) rel:narrower(inverse of rel:broader) rel:superClassOf(inverse of rel:subClassOf) rel:broader(inverse of rel:narrower) rel:subClassOf(inverse of rel:subClassOf) rel:partOf rel:directPartOf rel:indirectPartOf http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/relcat/relations Generic algorithms can use the upper part of the taxonomy and combine arbitrary graphs http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/query/combine?set=relish&set=gold Specific vocabularies (SKOS, OWL) should put (some) predicates in the proper place in the taxonomy Specific algorithms (OWL reasoners) can use the original set or combinations of sets using the same vocabulary 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 22 ,[object Object]
owl:sameAs
owl:equivalentClass
owl:equivalentProperty…
A fragment of the relation chart 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 23

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Sustainable operability: Keeping complex linguistic resources alive.
Sustainable operability: Keeping complex linguistic resources alive.Sustainable operability: Keeping complex linguistic resources alive.
Sustainable operability: Keeping complex linguistic resources alive.Menzo Windhouwer
 
A CMD Core Model for CLARIN Web Services
A CMD Core Model for CLARIN Web ServicesA CMD Core Model for CLARIN Web Services
A CMD Core Model for CLARIN Web ServicesMenzo Windhouwer
 
Za co jesteś wdzięczny?
Za co jesteś wdzięczny?Za co jesteś wdzięczny?
Za co jesteś wdzięczny?Gazeta Pomorska
 
Microsoft: Software + Servicios
Microsoft: Software + ServiciosMicrosoft: Software + Servicios
Microsoft: Software + Serviciosacabralinfogroup
 
Plains Indian Teepee
Plains Indian TeepeePlains Indian Teepee
Plains Indian Teepeeguest59aa42b
 
What do cats have to do with explicit semantics?
What do cats have to do with explicit semantics?What do cats have to do with explicit semantics?
What do cats have to do with explicit semantics?Menzo Windhouwer
 
Vip10750行程报价单诺维奇出发3天2晚0802010
Vip10750行程报价单诺维奇出发3天2晚0802010Vip10750行程报价单诺维奇出发3天2晚0802010
Vip10750行程报价单诺维奇出发3天2晚0802010guest55ae8d4
 
Test dla przedszkolaków
Test dla przedszkolakówTest dla przedszkolaków
Test dla przedszkolakówGazeta Pomorska
 
Collaboratively Defining Widely Accepted Linguistic Data Categories in the IS...
Collaboratively Defining Widely Accepted Linguistic Data Categories in the IS...Collaboratively Defining Widely Accepted Linguistic Data Categories in the IS...
Collaboratively Defining Widely Accepted Linguistic Data Categories in the IS...Menzo Windhouwer
 

Viewers also liked (16)

Sustainable operability: Keeping complex linguistic resources alive.
Sustainable operability: Keeping complex linguistic resources alive.Sustainable operability: Keeping complex linguistic resources alive.
Sustainable operability: Keeping complex linguistic resources alive.
 
A CMD Core Model for CLARIN Web Services
A CMD Core Model for CLARIN Web ServicesA CMD Core Model for CLARIN Web Services
A CMD Core Model for CLARIN Web Services
 
The ISO-DCR
The ISO-DCRThe ISO-DCR
The ISO-DCR
 
Use of ISOcat within CMDI
Use of ISOcat within CMDIUse of ISOcat within CMDI
Use of ISOcat within CMDI
 
Za co jesteś wdzięczny?
Za co jesteś wdzięczny?Za co jesteś wdzięczny?
Za co jesteś wdzięczny?
 
Microsoft: Software + Servicios
Microsoft: Software + ServiciosMicrosoft: Software + Servicios
Microsoft: Software + Servicios
 
Znani i popularni
Znani i popularniZnani i popularni
Znani i popularni
 
Plains Indian Teepee
Plains Indian TeepeePlains Indian Teepee
Plains Indian Teepee
 
Nie Tylko Dla Kobiet
Nie Tylko Dla KobietNie Tylko Dla Kobiet
Nie Tylko Dla Kobiet
 
What do cats have to do with explicit semantics?
What do cats have to do with explicit semantics?What do cats have to do with explicit semantics?
What do cats have to do with explicit semantics?
 
Królowie szos
Królowie szosKrólowie szos
Królowie szos
 
Vip10750行程报价单诺维奇出发3天2晚0802010
Vip10750行程报价单诺维奇出发3天2晚0802010Vip10750行程报价单诺维奇出发3天2晚0802010
Vip10750行程报价单诺维奇出发3天2晚0802010
 
Narzekasz?
Narzekasz?Narzekasz?
Narzekasz?
 
Definicje Alternatywne
Definicje AlternatywneDefinicje Alternatywne
Definicje Alternatywne
 
Test dla przedszkolaków
Test dla przedszkolakówTest dla przedszkolaków
Test dla przedszkolaków
 
Collaboratively Defining Widely Accepted Linguistic Data Categories in the IS...
Collaboratively Defining Widely Accepted Linguistic Data Categories in the IS...Collaboratively Defining Widely Accepted Linguistic Data Categories in the IS...
Collaboratively Defining Widely Accepted Linguistic Data Categories in the IS...
 

Similar to On the way to a Relation Registry for ISOcat data categories

RDA and FRBR — an update
RDA and FRBR — an updateRDA and FRBR — an update
RDA and FRBR — an updateJenn Riley
 
EAD, MARC and DACS
EAD, MARC and DACSEAD, MARC and DACS
EAD, MARC and DACSmillermax
 
Semantic Technologies and Triplestores for Business Intelligence
Semantic Technologies and Triplestores for Business IntelligenceSemantic Technologies and Triplestores for Business Intelligence
Semantic Technologies and Triplestores for Business IntelligenceMarin Dimitrov
 
Charleston 2012 - The Future of Serials in a Linked Data World
Charleston 2012 - The Future of Serials in a Linked Data WorldCharleston 2012 - The Future of Serials in a Linked Data World
Charleston 2012 - The Future of Serials in a Linked Data WorldProQuest
 
SKOS - 2007 Open Forum on Metadata Registries - NYC
SKOS - 2007 Open Forum on Metadata Registries - NYCSKOS - 2007 Open Forum on Metadata Registries - NYC
SKOS - 2007 Open Forum on Metadata Registries - NYCjonphipps
 
Linked Open Data Visualization
Linked Open Data VisualizationLinked Open Data Visualization
Linked Open Data VisualizationLaura Po
 
Tools of our Trade (RDA, MARC21) 2010-03-15
Tools of our Trade (RDA, MARC21) 2010-03-15Tools of our Trade (RDA, MARC21) 2010-03-15
Tools of our Trade (RDA, MARC21) 2010-03-15Ann Chapman
 
Porting terminologies to the Semantic Web
Porting terminologies to the Semantic WebPorting terminologies to the Semantic Web
Porting terminologies to the Semantic WebBernard Vatant
 
Semantic Web, Cataloging, & Metadata
Semantic Web, Cataloging, & MetadataSemantic Web, Cataloging, & Metadata
Semantic Web, Cataloging, & Metadatarobin fay
 
The tools of our trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC
The tools of our trade: AACR2/RDA and MARCThe tools of our trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC
The tools of our trade: AACR2/RDA and MARCAnn Chapman
 
Force11 JDDCP workshop presentation, @ Force2015, Oxford
Force11 JDDCP workshop presentation, @ Force2015, OxfordForce11 JDDCP workshop presentation, @ Force2015, Oxford
Force11 JDDCP workshop presentation, @ Force2015, OxfordMark Wilkinson
 
Getty Vocabulary Program LOD: Ontologies and Semantic Representation
Getty Vocabulary Program LOD: Ontologies and Semantic RepresentationGetty Vocabulary Program LOD: Ontologies and Semantic Representation
Getty Vocabulary Program LOD: Ontologies and Semantic RepresentationVladimir Alexiev, PhD, PMP
 
SKOS and Linked Data
SKOS and Linked DataSKOS and Linked Data
SKOS and Linked DataAntoine Isaac
 
Semantic Mapping in CLARIN Component Metadata.
Semantic Mapping in CLARIN Component Metadata.Semantic Mapping in CLARIN Component Metadata.
Semantic Mapping in CLARIN Component Metadata.Menzo Windhouwer
 

Similar to On the way to a Relation Registry for ISOcat data categories (20)

RDA and FRBR — an update
RDA and FRBR — an updateRDA and FRBR — an update
RDA and FRBR — an update
 
EAD, MARC and DACS
EAD, MARC and DACSEAD, MARC and DACS
EAD, MARC and DACS
 
Semantic Technologies and Triplestores for Business Intelligence
Semantic Technologies and Triplestores for Business IntelligenceSemantic Technologies and Triplestores for Business Intelligence
Semantic Technologies and Triplestores for Business Intelligence
 
Charleston 2012 - The Future of Serials in a Linked Data World
Charleston 2012 - The Future of Serials in a Linked Data WorldCharleston 2012 - The Future of Serials in a Linked Data World
Charleston 2012 - The Future of Serials in a Linked Data World
 
SKOS - 2007 Open Forum on Metadata Registries - NYC
SKOS - 2007 Open Forum on Metadata Registries - NYCSKOS - 2007 Open Forum on Metadata Registries - NYC
SKOS - 2007 Open Forum on Metadata Registries - NYC
 
Linked Open Data Visualization
Linked Open Data VisualizationLinked Open Data Visualization
Linked Open Data Visualization
 
Tools of our Trade (RDA, MARC21) 2010-03-15
Tools of our Trade (RDA, MARC21) 2010-03-15Tools of our Trade (RDA, MARC21) 2010-03-15
Tools of our Trade (RDA, MARC21) 2010-03-15
 
20110728 datalift-rpi-troy
20110728 datalift-rpi-troy20110728 datalift-rpi-troy
20110728 datalift-rpi-troy
 
Porting terminologies to the Semantic Web
Porting terminologies to the Semantic WebPorting terminologies to the Semantic Web
Porting terminologies to the Semantic Web
 
Semantic Web, Cataloging, & Metadata
Semantic Web, Cataloging, & MetadataSemantic Web, Cataloging, & Metadata
Semantic Web, Cataloging, & Metadata
 
Metadata : Concentrating on the data, not on the scheme
Metadata : Concentrating on the data, not on the schemeMetadata : Concentrating on the data, not on the scheme
Metadata : Concentrating on the data, not on the scheme
 
Introduction to RDA
Introduction to RDAIntroduction to RDA
Introduction to RDA
 
RDA
RDARDA
RDA
 
Tools Of Our Trade
Tools Of Our TradeTools Of Our Trade
Tools Of Our Trade
 
The tools of our trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC
The tools of our trade: AACR2/RDA and MARCThe tools of our trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC
The tools of our trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC
 
Force11 JDDCP workshop presentation, @ Force2015, Oxford
Force11 JDDCP workshop presentation, @ Force2015, OxfordForce11 JDDCP workshop presentation, @ Force2015, Oxford
Force11 JDDCP workshop presentation, @ Force2015, Oxford
 
Getty Vocabulary Program LOD: Ontologies and Semantic Representation
Getty Vocabulary Program LOD: Ontologies and Semantic RepresentationGetty Vocabulary Program LOD: Ontologies and Semantic Representation
Getty Vocabulary Program LOD: Ontologies and Semantic Representation
 
SKOS and Linked Data
SKOS and Linked DataSKOS and Linked Data
SKOS and Linked Data
 
Metadata Cloud
Metadata CloudMetadata Cloud
Metadata Cloud
 
Semantic Mapping in CLARIN Component Metadata.
Semantic Mapping in CLARIN Component Metadata.Semantic Mapping in CLARIN Component Metadata.
Semantic Mapping in CLARIN Component Metadata.
 

On the way to a Relation Registry for ISOcat data categories

  • 1. On the way to a Relation Registry for ISOcat data categories Irina Nevskaya – Frankfurt University Menzo Windhouwer – MPI for Psycholinguistics 10/10/2011 1 RELISH meets LOEWE
  • 2. Outline Introduction to ISOcat data categories Relations in ISOcat RELISH and ISOcat Introduction to Relation Registry RELcat 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 2
  • 3. A glimpse of ISOcat 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 3
  • 4. ISOcat data categories ISOcat is a Data Category Registry (DCR) an implementation of ISO 12620:2009 A data category is the result of the specification of a given data field an elementary descriptor in a linguistic structure or an annotation scheme 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 4
  • 5. Goal: semantic interoperability 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 5 partOfSpeech Lemma writtenForm writtenForm Word Form grammaticalGender lexicalType grammaticalGender wordOrder Lexicon 1..* A (schema for a) typological database Lexical Entry Shared semantics! 0..* 1..* Form Sense 0..* A (schema for a) LMF lexicon
  • 6. Data category types 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 6 open constrained complex: closed writtenForm grammaticalGender email string string string Constraint: .+@.+ neuter feminine masculine simple:
  • 7. Data category types 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 7 lexicalResource container: globalInformation lexicon language alphabet lexicalEntry japanese ipa lemma writtenForm
  • 8. Data category relationships 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 8 Value domain membership Subsumption relationships between simple data categories (legacy) Relationships between complex/container data categories are not stored in ISOcat … … but can be stored in RELcat, a Relation Registry partOfSpeech string pronoun personal pronoun
  • 9. No relationships in ISOcat? 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 9 Rationale: Relation types and modeling strategies for a given data category may differ from application to application; Motivation to agree on relation and modeling strategies will be stronger at individual application level; Integration of multiple relation structures in DCR itself could lead to endless ontological clutter.
  • 10. RELISH and ISOcat 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 10
  • 11. Harmonization of Terminology between GOLD and the ISO Data Category Registry in the RELISH project The ILIT team created a suitable transformation of the concepts of the GOLD ontology into data categories. The team in Frankfurt (FRA) has created an MDF data category selection. These data category selections (GOLD and MDF) have been made public. By mapping on the ISOcat data categories, a harmonization of the used semantic categories should be achieved. A chart with interrelations between the MDF, GOLD and standard ISOcat data categories was created; types of relations between the categories were established to be implemented in the Relation Registry and in mapping the categories in the process of lexicon import into LEXUS as well as into RELISH-LIFT interchange formats. 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 11
  • 12. Problems encountered by an attempt of mapping MDF categories are mostly complex ones. They contain a language property (value): - v - vernacular - e – English - n – national - r – regional GOLD and „standard“ ISOcats do not contain a language property GOLD and „standard“ ISOcats are thought of more as concepts, not as their concrete realizations 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 12
  • 13. Types of relations between the MDF, GOLD and standard ISOcat data categories sameAs: MDF-ISOcat “gloss” (DC-3711) is sameAs the ISOcat “gloss” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-244 almostSameAs: MDF-ISOcat “gloss national” (DC-3711) is almostSameAs the ISOcat “gloss” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-244 partOf: The MDF-ISOcat “Gloss (national)” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3711combines 1) the ISOcat “gloss” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-244, 2) the MDF-ISOcat „national language” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3702 They have, thus the relation partOf the MDF-ISOcat “Gloss (national)” 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 13
  • 14.
  • 15. The MDF “Borrowed word (loan)“ (DC-3688) is sameAs the standard ISOcat “source language” (DC-2494)10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 14
  • 16. Does the name of the category help to find a match? The names can coincide, but different phenomena are meant: - The MDF ISO category “citation form (vernacular)”, defined as “a form for representing a lexeme” (DC-3716) should not be confused with the GOLD category “citation”. The GOLD category is defined as “The action of citing or quoting any words or written passage from a publication that allows others to locate and identify the original source. Typical details include the title, author's name, the journal title (for articles), publication date and page numbers used in research.” The MDF ISO category is almostSameAs the ISOcat "sort key" (DC-469), defined as “a form for sorting a printed dictionary”. 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 15
  • 17. Various relations between „standard“categories in the ISOcat Data Registry No generic term in the standard set of ISO categories: - In the ISOcats registry, there is no generic term “date”, but a number of more specific “date” terms: “origination date”: http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-166 “check date”: http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-126 “creation date” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-2251 “importation date”: http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-265 “modification date”: http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-365 etc. The MDF category “date” (DC-365) marks both the date of the data creation and the date of the data modification. 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 16
  • 18. Various relations between „standard“categories in the ISO cat Data Registry Polysemy of the categories: MDF-ISOcat “gloss” (DC-3707) is almostSameAs the ISOcat “gloss” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-244 only in its first meaning: “In TEI: A phrase or word used to provide a gloss or definition for some other word or phrase. In 1951: Any editorial comment.” 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 17
  • 19. Various relations between „standard“categories in the ISOcat Data Registry Synonymy of the categories: - The ISOcat “etymology” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-221 is sameAsto the ISOcat “etymological root” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1987 - The ISOcat „comment“ http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-1846 issameAsto the ISOcat “note” http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-382 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 18
  • 20. RELcat a Relation Registry 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 19
  • 21. Relation Registry Stores typed relationships between data categories: ISOcat, Dublin Core, … concepts: GOLD, … Sets of relationships are owned by individuals or groups no standardization effort can be combined might need conflict resolution can use their own vocabulary hookup into a core taxonomy of relation types Exploitation: Various levels of semantic search CMDI metadata search CMDRSB 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 20
  • 22. RELcat An implementation of a Relation Registry Based on a RDF quad store, SPARQL (and RDFS Plus) Status: read-only backend in alpha stage Upload of relations by admin Available sets Metadata: CMDI and Dublin Core http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/relcat/set/cmdi http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/relcat/set/dc RELISH: RELISH and GOLD http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/relcat/set/relish http://lux13.mpi.nl/isocat/relcat/set/gold Representations: .rdf .trig .svg .png … Queries on multiple sets are supported Misses: UI, reasoner, handling of same-as cliques, … 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 21
  • 23.
  • 27. A fragment of the relation chart 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 23
  • 28. Types of semantic relations 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 24
  • 29. A Fragment of the RELcat 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 25
  • 30. A Fragment of the RELcat 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 26
  • 31. 10/10/2011 RELISH meets LOEWE 27 Thank you for your attention! Visit and use: www.isocat.org Track and debug: lux13.mpi.nl/relcat/ Questions or feedback? nevskaya@em.uni-frankfurt.de Menzo.Windhouwer@mpi.nl