At the moment, both Angular and Polymer are leading technologies for the frontend work of app development. Both platforms have different aspects to cater to for development purposes. Understandably, selecting the right one can be quite a challenge. Polymer is a JavaScript library, while Angular is an open-source framework perfect for developing web applications. This write-up highlights the key features of Angular and Polymer to give you a complete picture. Visit Here for More: https://www.moontechnolabs.com/blog/angular-vs-polymer-a-face-off-for-the-throne-of-frontend-development/

1. Angular Vs. Polymer
-
A Face-Off For The Throne
Of Front End Development

2. 7. In terms of ease of testing:
7.1. Polymer
7.2. Angular
8. In terms of architecture:
8.1 Polymer
8.2 Angular
9. In terms of scalability:
9.1 Polymer
9.2 Angular
10. Final Words
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. About Angular
3. Researched Data:
4. What Angular can do?
5. The pros and cons:
5.1. Advantages of using Polymer:
5.2. Disadvantages of Polymer:
5.3. Advantages of Angular:
5.4. Disadvantages of Angular:
6. In terms of performance:
6.1. Polymer
6.2. Angular

3. At the moment, both Angular and Polymer are leading technologies for the frontend work of app development.
Both platforms have different aspects to cater to for development purposes. Understandably, selecting the right
one can be quite a challenge. Polymer is a JavaScript library, while Angular is an open-source framework perfect
for developing web applications. This write-up highlights the key features of Angular and Polymer to give you a
complete picture.
When an angular app development company works on an app development project, the professionals prioritize
designing an intuitive and unique UI. However, it’s easy to talk about it, but things become difficult when handling
the project. Selecting the appropriate frontend tech requires an in-depth understanding of how various platforms
function and how you can leverage the specialties of those platforms for your project.
Introduction

4. If you think you’re going to explore the documentation of every available tech, look into their pros and cons,
scrutinize the way different organizations used them, you should forget about it. There’s no way to do it. Then
again, you shouldn’t worry about it because you have this write-up at your disposal.
Here you’ll find an in-depth comparison between two rivaling ~ frontend technologies – Polymer and Angular.
The comparison will be on various grounds forming the base of every project of web app development. Both
platforms have multiple approaches to development, and by the end of this write-up, you’ll have a clearer picture
of your needs that you can satisfy with the right solution.

5. If you ask an angular app development company, the experts working there will describe Angular as a
typescript-based JavaScript framework that can help businesses develop scalable web applications by migrating
into a native app using angular. This standalone frontend framework comes with an inbuilt toolkit and libraries
that will never affect the size or speed of an application. It offers development opportunities over several
platforms due to reusable code that will be of use for every deployment target. It even has a dynamic UI binding
at a simple property or object level, along with a two-way data binding fundamental to its architecture.
About Angular

6. ● According to experts, Angular makes up for 0.4% of all websites designed using the JavaScript library.
● Only a few sites use Angular, but most of them get a lot of traffic.
● On GitHub, Angular has 72,600 stars, 19,000 forms, and almost 1300 contributors. It even boasts of
having a storehouse of 1.7 million users.
● Around 16.1% of all developers in the world use Angular.
Researched Data:

7. If you hire angular developers, they can build the following applications for you.
What Angular can do?

8. Advantages of using Polymer:
● A developer can utilize the functionality of custom element creation to compose CSS, HTML, and JS as
custom elements.
● Polymer comes with structured and properly maintained documentation as opposed to Angular/React. It
proves significantly advantageous when bringing in new developers to an existing team.
● Polymer supports one-way and two-way data binding. With the second functionality, developers can make
changes in both downward and upward directions between host elements, as well as DOM elements.
Naturally, data updates will take place between the target elements and the host automatically.
● The architecture of Polymer doesn’t include any extra security layer. That’s why developers connect to
third-party libraries, such as Chart.js, Mathjax, d3js, and more to build applications without any hassle.
The pros and cons:

9. ● Polymer doesn’t offer a clear explanation as to how a developer can leverage its specialities to organize
and build large-scale applications. If you hire angular developers and ask them to work on a large-scale
application using Polymer, they will disagree with you.
● Developers often find it difficult to understand the web component structure of Polymer and introduce
necessary changes in their coding styles. Naturally, they rewrite the codes and spend a lot of time testing
the same for bugs. In the long run, this problem affects the overall timeline of the projects and causes
unnecessary delays.
● Polymer users often complain about its below-par performance standards in mobile applications. If most of
your digital products are on mobile devices, you should reconsider your choice.
Disadvantages of Polymer:

10. ● JavaScript’s superset offers enhanced navigation, refactoring services, and auto-complete. These features
work together to eliminate all errors within code while allowing the developer to work on enterprise-scale
applications.
● Angular delivers incredibly high performance to the developers ensured by the hierarchical dependency
injection, AOT compiler, Angular Universal support, differential loading, and Ivy renderer.
● Angular has long-term support from Google further backed with detailed documentation. There’s also a
possibility that the framework will expand and receive enhanced developmental features in the future.
● Angular is one such framework that facilitates easy integration of third-party applications, which, in turn,
offers more flexibility and tools for the progress of development.
● The command-line interface of Angular provides recommendations needed for loaders, dependencies, and
plug-ins now and then.
● All modules and elements of Angular can accommodate integration from other frameworks. Developers
can even customize things depending on their requirements. It’s also possible for them to reuse and
manage the HTML elements of Angular by wrapping them as a DOM element.
Advantages of Angular:

11. ● Shifting from AngularJS to Angular can be problematic for developers. The difficulties increase when the
framework application is too large. Besides, just shifting from one to the other isn’t going to be enough. A
developer has the learn how to use Angular if he/she transitions to it from AngularJS, and the associated
learning curve is going to be steep.
● Even after having a component-based architecture, managing those components and associated
repetitiveness make the frontend framework wordy for the development community.
● Due to the requirements of abstractions, boilerplate codes and other bundled features, even the simplest
and smallest applications tend to get bloated.
Disadvantages of Angular:

12. In terms of performance:
Polymer
The performance standard of an app is a crucial factor while developing a web application. In that regard, Polymer
introduced lit-HTML v1.0 and LitElement v2.0. The former serves as a swift and lightweight HTML template
library, while the latter is a JS library used for creating lightweight web components. The ultimate objective of
both libraries is to augment the performance of an app with web components that a developer can use with or
without app development frameworks.
For high-performance frameworks, Angular already managed to prove itself by facilitating enhanced performance.
Ivy renderer bestows power upon the framework, which is a rewritten version of Angular’s rendering engine. It
can make applications faster and more compact for unparalleled performance and compile components that
further reduce the time required for the development.
Angular

13. In terms of ease of testing:
Polymer
The creators of Polymer developed an end-to-end testing environment. They call it the Web Component Tester. It
has all the functionalities of a third-party testing tool, such as Sinon, Chai, Mocha, Selenium, and more. This
feature negates the hassle of learning how to use a new tool.
Angular
For the providers of angular development services, testing is an imperative part of the framework itself. Also, all
the JavaScript codes in Angular have to pass a series of tests. The convenience offered by Angular in terms of
testing allows developers to work on a project from scratch and test every component seamlessly.

14. In terms of architecture:
Polymer
Polymer developers don’t have to adhere to any specific structure as its main function is to build the web
components for an application. There are four interconnected layers in the internal architecture of Polymer.
● The foundation has polyfills and they add features to browsers not natively included in the same.
● The native contains all essential features available natively on browsers.
● The elements consist of a basic set that acts as building blocks for developers to build applications.
● The core provides the required infrastructure to explore the features offered by the foundation and native
layers.

15. Angular
There is a Model-View-Controller architecture in Angular that isolates the logic of the app from the UI layer and
supports the separation of concerns effectively. This architecture further helps to organize the components of the
code according to design and performance-related differences. It even simplifies the development structure by
combining the MVC pattern and two-way data binding.

16. In terms of scalability:
Polymer
Owing to the block structure of Polymers, developers can add new code blocks to the structure to scale an app
up or down without altering previous codes. Most of the recognized and used browsers also support Polymer,
which improves the possibility of achieving app compatibility. In short, it’s perfectly possible to build scalable
frontend apps with Polymer.
Angular
Due to continuous support from Google and other world-renowned corporations, Angular is an all-inclusive
framework that the providers of angular development services can use to create enterprise-level applications. The
scalability of this framework is the result of its impactful feature designs and command-line interface.

17. Source: https://www.moontechnolabs.com/blog/angular-vs-polymer-a-face-off-for-the-throne-of-frontend-development/
Final words
You need to learn a bit about the two to decide what to use for your web app project. Unfortunately, it isn’t
possible to include more info in this write-up. However, it will tell you about what to choose depending on a few
considerations. The polymer should be your choice if you’re going to build an e-commerce application, news
platform, websites, and taxi hiring or sharing applications. For a customized app with exclusive requirements,
Angular is the better choice. You should also stick with it if you wish to leverage HTML, JavaScript, and CSS, build
an app with personalized features and multiple events, create an app with shareable components, or a messaging
platform like WhatsApp.

18. Thank You!