5. Public health surveillance
• It is the ongoing, systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health-
related data essential to planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health
practice.
6. Why Do We Use Public Health Surveillance?
• Because it can
• size of a health problem
• geographical occurrence of illness
• natural history of a disease
• detect epidemics or define a problem
• generate hypotheses
• changes in infectious agents
• changes in health practices
• facilitate emergency planning
7. Cont.
• Now a days public health services progress towards
the digitalization/computerization.
• So it is essential to integrate the data to gain meaningful information for planning
health programs.
• As a part of International Health Regulations (IHR) core capacity building, India
need to strengthen public health surveillance systems.
• Needs a comprehensive information system to monitor emerging and re-emerging
public health threats, disasters and mass events.
8. Cont.
• Public health surveillance is not only about collection, analysis, interpretation
but also the dissemination of health data for the batter planning,
implementation and evaluation of public health action.
• Thus it is essential to get a single operating picture of health profile by integrating
all the health-related information.
9. Cont. History
• 1988 Cholera outbreak in Delhi & 1994 plague outbreak in Surat
• huge morbidity and mortality, the country sustained huge economic losses
• 1995- NAAC(National Apical Advisory Committee) for national disease
surveillance and response system.
• 1997-National Surveillance Programme for Communicable Diseases
HIV Sentinel Surveillance -one of the first nationwide disease surveillance
programmes, which began in 1992 & expanded across the country in 1998.
10. Cont.
• 2004- IDSP(project) funded by world bank for 5 years.
• converted into a programme and funded under the 12th Five-year Plan (2012-17)
within the NHM.
• 26th November 2018- improve the digital capabilities of the IDSP, Integrated
Health Information Platform (IHIP) was soft launched by the MOHFW,
Government of India.
• 5th April 2021- an upgraded version of IHIP was virtually launched by Dr Harsh
Vardhan.
11. Introduction of IHIP
• It is a web-based real-time, village wise, case based electronic health information
system which will aim to provide details about epidemic-prone diseases with
Geographical Information System (GIS) for managing disease outbreaks and
related resources thus reducing the morbidity and mortality and lessening disease
burden in the populations.
12. • Single operating platform of the health data and information of India
• real-time information on human health across India
• Reduces data and information fragmentation
• 33+ health conditions
• public health surveillance in IHIP: Time , Place, Person
• Geospatial epidemiology
• provides analysis on mobile and electronic devices
• Role & hierarchy based feedback & alert mechanisms are maintained.
Cont.
13. Objectives
• Collect real time data with time, place and person distribution in respect of
diseases with outbreak potential
• Develop a surveillance system for early warning signs
• Plan preparedness as per the Disease calender with logistics
• Epidemiological investigation with RRTs
• Timely surveillance and response
• Data integration with other relevant portals
14. Two key phases for data reporting
• The process of data reporting on IHIP under IDSP consists of the following
two key phases.
verification of master data of
health facilities (including
examining of user IDs and
passwords, creation of user
profiles, health facility
directory, etc.).
one-time initial activity to set
up basic information.
reporting disease surveillance
data (including event alerts
and outbreak)
which is a continuous activity
carried out in a real-time
manner.
1 2
15. What are the essential differences between IDSP
portal and new IHSP?
• IHSP is designed to:
– Capture disaggregate data of persons at
all levels
– Link data from S, P, L, EWS 1
and 2 forms
– Capture real-time or daily surveillance
data
– Monitor more than 33+ health
conditions
– Provide analysis on mobile
and electronic devices
– Integrate with ongoing surveillance
programs
• IDSP was designed to:
– Capture aggregate data only
– Not to link data from S, P and
L forms
– Weekly surveillance
– Monitor 22 health
conditions
– Paper-based data collection
16. Block PHC
or Community Health Center
(Medical Doctor + helper)
Sub Center
Primary Health Center
(Auxiliary Nurse Midwife, or Male Health Worker)
Weekly household
visits to collect data
PaperForms
One consolidated “P”
form/PHC/week + “L” forms
B-PHC or CHC data
collected from PHCs
Paper forms are
converted to
electronic data
Spreadsheets
Electronic data, kept in the form
of XL sheets or on a DB / Portal
IDSP
Database Spreadsheets
PaperForms
One Consolidated “S” Form per
Sub-center per week
Email/Web Entry
Hand
deliver
Hand
deliver Laboratory Presence
District Surveillance Unit
(District Surveillance Officer,
Data Manager, Data Entry Operator)
LaboratoryPresence
State Surveillance Unit
(State Surveillance Officer,
Data Manager, Data Entry Operator)
State
(36 States/UTs)
District
(707)
Sub-district
(6267)
Village
(655075)
LaboratoryPresence
Conventional IDSP’s Data Collection Process at State-level
(718)
17.
18. Linkages of the central surveillance unit at
the central level
19.
20. Rationale for use of case definitions
• Uniformity in case reporting at district, state and national level.
• Use of the same criteria by reporting units to report cases.
• Compatibility with the case definitions used in WHO recommended
surveillance standard.
• Allow international information exchanges.
21. Active and Passive Reporting
Reporting
Active Passive
Field Health
Workers
Home Visits
S Form
Medical officers and
Laboratory Technicians
Presumptive and Confirm
cases(P & L form)
33. CURRENT STATUS OF IHIP IN OUTBREAK?
• Provides Health condition alert
• Threshold set for each disease
• automated epidemic curve plot and pathogen wise distribution of cases
• hotspots can be identified from the clusters with the information obtained from
GIS tagging of individual cases.
• fastening the outbreak investigation by selecting rapid response team from the
IHIP portal via online, based on the availability of trained members in the
particular outbreak area.
35. Existing Structure of Public Health Surveillance
• successfully integrated: 1) NVBDCP 2)Zoonotic infections
3) Diarrheal Disease Control Program
4) VPD 5) ARI
• Not yet fully integrated: 1)NACP 2) NTEP 3)RCH
• Vertical programs run their own standalone portals:
1) SI-NACO for National AIDS Control Program (NACP)
2) Nikshay for National TB Elimination Program (NTEP) and
3) RCH Portal for the Reproductive and Child Health (RCH) program.
36. Limitations of existing Public Health Surveillance
System
1. Implementation Challenges
2. Limited Private Sector Involvement
3. Programs and Institutions work in vertical siloes
4. Human Resource and Training challenge
5. Limited use of media
6. Limited focus on Non-Communicable Diseases
7. Limited focus on Occupational Health
37. References:
• Mogan Ka1 *, Aravind Gandhi Periyasamy2 , Venkatesh U.1 , Jugal Kishore1. A situation model of
integrated health information platform in India: an anticipated review. Int J Community Med
Public Health. 2020 Mar;7(3):1197-1200.
• Integrated Health Information Program (IHIP). Available at: https://ihip.nhp.gov.in.
• Guidelines of Soft launch Integrated Health Information Platform Integrated Disesase Surveillance
Programme of Segment of November; 2018.
• Park K. Park’s Text book of preventive and social medicine. 26th Edition. Jabalpur: M/s
Banarsidas Bhanot, 2021
• Kadri AM, Kundapur R, Khan AM, Kakkar R, Sheth A, Mangrola N. editors. IAPSM’s Textbook
of Community Medicine. 2nd edition. Jaypee Brothers Medical Pub; 2021.
Editor's Notes
Health Planning - Is the process of defining community health problems, Identifying needs and resources, establishing priority goals, and setting out the administrative action needed to reach those goals.
Health Planning - Is the process of defining community health problems, Identifying needs and resources, establishing priority goals, and setting out the administrative action needed to reach those goals.
So, for that it Needs a comprehensive information system to monitor emerging and re-emerging public health threats, disasters and mass events.
For the nationwide disease surveillance programmes, HIV Sentinel Surveillance was 1st to began in 1992 & it expanded across the country in 1998.
1995 Centra govt. leads establishment of-National Apical Advisory Committee (NAAC)
1997-initiation of National Surveillance Programme for Communicable Diseases
In march-2003: Central Surveillance Unit (CSU) was established
And later on it extended up to 2012.
In 12th five year plan(2012-17) converted into programme within the NHM
NHM-National Health Mission
After that, IHIP has been implemented but not yet fully functional across the nation
Geospatial epidemiology- ability to describe and analyze geographic variations in diseases.
So, main aim to design and development of this platform is to the strengthening of India’s Public Health Surveillance System.
eHealth standards(extra)
1st – generation of Unique ID and password it leads to create unique user profile for that health facility. and it is one time activity.
Certain benefits of IHIP as compare to IDSP
avoiding resource wastage
2) integrates data from both public and private health sectors
3) providing signal for outbreak earlier than IDSP
providing quick information and response with better quality and efficiency
In IHIP, All health ministry, local governments and municipalities can asses information with real-time information on any electronic device from anywhere.
Weekly reporting
In paper form
S form filled by field health worker send to PHC
P & L form at PHC, CHC, DH, med. Clg.
Send to DSU- where it were converted in electronic data.
CBHI- Central Bureau of Health Intelligence
Again it is Same in IHIP but in digitalised way.
Doctors from PHC, CHC, DH, med clg, private practitioners.
L form- for lab confirm cases which is from any govt. or private lab.
In the IDSP modules, there was release of Case definitions for the diseases under the surveillance.
Passive- done when person/patient themselves reported to the health facility.
Now let’s take Certain visuals of IHIP and comparison of reporting in old IDSP and new IHIP.
IHIP in it’s toolbar it contains
Outbreak- information regarding any event alert
Report- diseases summery, summery of suspected, probable and lab confirm cases.
Downloads- user information, TOT documents, form.
Karnataka
S,P,L
Three filtered form in regarding duration
S- no. of cases along with deaths
P- number of cases along with lab tested
L- sample tested along with sample positive
Top portion shows details regarding the reporting unit.
Digitalised version of S form
Detail regarding subcentre
Top portion shows Person sociodemographic details
Select syndrome by click on it or on next button which was same as hard copy in old IDSP
Filed health worker doing Syndromic Surveillance Data Collection on Mobile Platform.
Top portion shows details regarding reporting unit.
There are 22 conditions covered under P forms.
This is the digitalised version of P form
Personal details of person followed by clinical details
Top portion shows details regarding reporting unit.
Conditions covered under L forms are
It is digitalised version of L form in IHIP
In which on top portion it include personal details of person
In middle clinical details and lastly the laboratory details.
Auto generated report based on number of sample tased along with the confirm cases of particular disease.
Frequency distribution of cases over the periods of time.
This is also system generated report in IHIP.
Reporting of influenza dis. In Karnataka.
Week wise Frequency distribution of cases over the periods of time.
Spot map of influenza cases
Pie diagram- variant wise distribution of influenza
View a map of Karnataka state in contest to influenza cases.
Blue round show no. of cases of the specific areas.
Red area shoe the hotspot area where large no. cases were aggregated.
vertical programs
SI-NACO: strategic information management system
No uniform structure in outbreak investigation process & reporting.
3. NTEP, NACP, RCH work in vertical siloes.
4. Most of the posts are filled on contractual basis & there is frequent shortage of staff, and also lack of implementation of training programs in the field of surveillance.
5. Only a few states have functional media scanning cells
6. Because of epidemiological transition, there is a dual burden of communicable and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in India