NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
TapaCarp vs eTapaCarp _ Mina
1. ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE
FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE
Technologies for
Vocational Education and Training
Scaling-up TapaCarp
Mina Shirvani
8.04.2014
2. Problem
• High hardware and maintenance cost of TapaCarp
• Idea: develop a cheap web-based version: eTapaCarp
DUAL-T Advisory Board Meeting 2014 2
TapaCarp eTapaCarp
3. Research question
• Does the split of input and output planes affect the performance?
• Do gaze patterns vary when the feedback is displayed on the
same plane as the input, versus on a computer display?
DUAL-T Advisory Board Meeting 2014 3
5. Experiment Setup
• Task: edge finding activity
– finding highlighted edges on a tangible block,
on the three orthographic projections
– 10 questions
• Participants
– 18 EPFL students from MT and ME sections
– 9 participants per condition
DUAL-T Advisory Board Meeting 2014 5
7. Results
DUAL-T Advisory Board Meeting 2014 7
• Part 1: Performance
– Duration of activity
– Accuracy of response
– Movement of block
• Part 2: Gaze pattern analysis
– Time spent on each AOI
– Number of glances
– Duration of glances
– Revisit time
– Transitions among AOIs
8. Duration of the activity
DUAL-T Advisory Board Meeting 2014 8
• eTapacarp: m=516.26, SD=207.36
• Tapacarp: m=619.88, SD=160.34
• Not significant : F[1,16]=1.4, p=0.25
9. Number of correctly completed questions
DUAL-T Advisory Board Meeting 2014 9
TapaCarp: m=8.33, SD=1.87
eTapaCarp: m=7.89, SD=2.14
13. 2-way transitions b.w. views and object
DUAL-T Advisory Board Meeting 2014 13
17%
31%
52%
Transition type: front to obj side to obj top to obj
38%
35%
27%
Significant differences:
• side : F[1,16]=5.63, P=0.03
• top: F[1,16]=10.78 , P=0.0047
14. Summery
• No significant difference in accuracy and duration of the
activity in both conditions
• Presence of some differences between the gaze patterns in
the two conditions
DUAL-T Advisory Board Meeting 2014 14