7. King, J. M., Tharme, R. E., & De Villiers, M. S. (2000). Environmental flow assessments for rivers:
manual for the Building Block Methodology (p. 340). Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
8. Desired flow levels for cultural needs at Kachla Ghat (EF2). Top-levels for maintenance
and drought years at the cross-section.
Source:Lokgariwar C., Chopra R., Smakhtin V., Bharati L. & OโKeeffe J. (2013)
1m depth at banks
allows bathing,
also offers depth
reqd for dolphins
Floods replenish
fields + wetlands
9. Comparison of desired flow levels for all
groups at Chaubari, Ramganga
Motivation:
๏ฌ
Shelter for fish &
Invertebrates
๏ฌ
Cremation at
banks
๏ฌ
Longitudinal
connectivity
Motivation:
๏ฌ
Flows reach
vegetation line
๏ฌ
Annual inundation
of fields
๏ฌ
Lateral connectivity
10. Cultural flow requirements vs naturalised
flows at EF sites for maintenance years
Chicu Lokgariwar, Ravi Chopra, Vladimir Smakhtin, Luna Bharati & Jay OโKeeffe , Water International (2013): Including cultural water
requirements in environmental flow assessment: an example from the upper Ganga River, India, Water International, DOI:
10.1080/02508060.2013.863684