Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems
Marianne Swanson Pauline Bowen Amy Wohl Phillips Dean Gallup David Lynes
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Rev. 1
Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems
Marianne Swanson Pauline Bowen Amy Wohl Phillips Dean Gallup David Lynes
May 2010
U.S. Department of Commerce
Gary Locke, Secretary
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Patrick D. Gallagher, Director
Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
There are references in this publication to documents currently under development by NIST in accordance with responsibilities assigned to NIST under the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002. The methodologies in this document may be used even before the completion of such companion documents. Thus, until such time as each document is completed, current requirements, guidelines, and procedures (where they exist) remain operative. For planning and transition purposes, federal agencies may wish to closely follow the development of these new documents by NIST. Individuals are also encouraged to review the public draft documents and offer their comments to NIST.
All NIST documents mentioned in this publication, other than the ones noted above, are available at http://csrc.nist.gov/publications.
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-34 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-34, 150 pages (May 2010) CODEN: NSPUE2
CONTINGENCY PLANNING GUIDE FOR FEDERAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Reports on Computer Systems Technology
The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in federal computer systems. This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations.
ii
CONTINGENCY PLANNING GUIDE FOR FEDERAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Authority
This document has been developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in furtherance of its st.
Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems Maria.docx
1. Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems
Marianne Swanson Pauline Bowen Amy Wohl Phillips Dean
Gallup David Lynes
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Rev. 1
Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems
Marianne Swanson Pauline Bowen Amy Wohl Phillips Dean
Gallup David Lynes
May 2010
U.S. Department of Commerce
Gary Locke, Secretary
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Patrick D. Gallagher, Director
Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be
identified in this document in order to describe an experimental
procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not
intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the
National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it
intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are
necessarily the best available for the purpose.
There are references in this publication to documents currently
under development by NIST in accordance with responsibilities
assigned to NIST under the Federal Information Security
Management Act of 2002. The methodologies in this document
may be used even before the completion of such companion
documents. Thus, until such time as each document is
completed, current requirements, guidelines, and procedures
(where they exist) remain operative. For planning and transition
purposes, federal agencies may wish to closely follow the
development of these new documents by NIST. Individuals are
also encouraged to review the public draft documents and offer
their comments to NIST.
All NIST documents mentioned in this publication, other than
the ones noted above, are available at
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications.
2. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special
Publication 800-34 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-
34, 150 pages (May 2010) CODEN: NSPUE2
CONTINGENCY PLANNING GUIDE FOR FEDERAL
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Reports on Computer Systems Technology
The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S.
economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership
for the nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL
develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept
implementations, and technical analysis to advance the
development and productive use of information technology.
ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical,
physical, administrative, and management standards and
guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of
sensitive unclassified information in federal computer systems.
This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research,
guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its
collaborative activities with industry, government, and
academic organizations.
ii
CONTINGENCY PLANNING GUIDE FOR FEDERAL
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Authority
This document has been developed by the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) in furtherance of its statutory
responsibilities under the Federal Information Security
Management Act (FISMA) of 2002, Public Law 107-347.
NIST is responsible for developing standards and guidelines,
including minimum requirements, for providing adequate
information security for all agency operations and assets, but
such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national
security systems. This guideline is consistent with the
requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A-130, Section 8b(3), “Securing Agency Information
3. Systems,” as analyzed in A-130, Appendix IV: Analysis of Key
Sections. Supplemental information is provided in A-130,
Appendix III.
This guideline has been prepared for use by federal agencies. It
may be used by nongovernmental organizations on a voluntary
basis and is not subject to copyright. Attribution would be
appreciated by NIST.
Nothing in this document should be taken to contradict
standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on
federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory
authority. Nor should these guidelines be interpreted as altering
or superseding the existing authorities of the Secretary of
Commerce, Director of the OMB, or any other federal official.
NIST Special Publication 800-34, Revision 1, 150 pages
(May 2010)
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Attn: Computer Security Division, Information Technology
Laboratory 100 Bureau Drive (Mail Stop 8930) Gaithersburg,
MD 20899-8930
iii
CONTINGENCY PLANNING GUIDE FOR FEDERAL
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Compliance with NIST Standards and Guidelines
NIST develops and issues standards, guidelines, and other
publications to assist federal agencies in implementing the
Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of 2002
and in managing cost- effective programs to protect their
information and information systems.
· Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) are
developed by NIST in accordance with FISMA. FIPS are
approved by the Secretary of Commerce and are compulsory and
binding for federal agencies. Since FISMA requires that federal
agencies comply with these standards, agencies may not waive
their use.
· Guidance documents and recommendations are issued in the
NIST Special Publication (SP) 800- series. Office of
4. Management and Budget (OMB) policies (including OMB
FISMA Reporting Instructions for the Federal Information
Security Management Act and Agency Privacy Management)
state that, for other than national security programs and
systems, agencies must follow NIST guidance.1
· Other security-related publications, including NIST
interagency and internal reports (NISTIRs) and ITL Bulletins,
provide technical and other information about NIST’s activities.
These publications are mandatory only when so specified by
OMB.
1 While agencies are required to follow NIST guidance in
accordance with OMB policy, there is flexibility within NIST’s
guidance in how agencies apply the guidance. Unless otherwise
specified by OMB, the 800-series guidance documents
published by NIST generally allow agencies some latitude in the
application. Consequently, the application of NIST guidance by
agencies can result in different security solutions that are
equally acceptable, compliant with the guidance, and meet the
OMB definition of adequate security for federal information
systems. When assessing federal agency compliance with NIST
guidance, auditors, evaluators, and assessors should consider
the intent of the security concepts and principles articulated
within the particular guidance document and how the agency
applied the guidance in the context of its specific mission
responsibilities, operational environments, and unique
organizational conditions.
iv
CONTINGENCY PLANNING GUIDE FOR FEDERAL
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Acknowledgements
The authors, Marianne Swanson and Pauline Bowen of the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Amy
Wohl Phillips, Dean Gallup, and David Lynes of Booz Allen
Hamilton, wish to thank their colleagues who reviewed drafts of
this document and contributed to its technical content. The
authors would like to acknowledge Kelley Dempsey, Esther
5. Katzman, Peter Mell, Murugiah Souppaya, Lee Badger, and
Elizabeth Lennon of NIST, and David Linthicum of Booz Allen
Hamilton for their keen and insightful assistance with technical
issues throughout the development of the document.
v
3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 3.4.5 3.4.6 Plan 3.5.1 3.5.2 3.5.3 3.5.4
Plan
Backup and Recovery
................................................................................... 20
Backup Methods and Offsite Storage
............................................................ 21 Alternate Sites
...............................................................................................
21 Equipment Replacement
............................................................................... 24 Cost
Considerations
...................................................................................... 25
Roles and Responsibilities
............................................................................ 26
Testing, Training, and Exercises
(TT&E)..........................................................27
Testing....................................................................................
.......................27
Training..................................................................................
........................ 28 Exercises
...............................................................................................
........ 29 TT&E Program Summary
..............................................................................29
Maintenance
...............................................................................................
...... 31
Information System Contingency Plan
Development...............................34
CONTINGENCY PLANNING GUIDE FOR FEDERAL
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Table of Contents
Executive
7. ............................................................ 8
3. 2.2.3 Crisis Communications
Plan............................................................................9
4. 2.2.4 Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP)
Plan.....................................................9
5. 2.2.5 Cyber Incident Response Plan
...................................................................... 10
6. 2.2.6 Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP)
...................................................................... 10
7. 2.2.7 Information System Contingency Plan
(ISCP)...............................................10
8. 2.2.8 Occupant Emergency Plan (OEP)
................................................................. 10
Information System Contingency Planning
Process................................13
Develop the Contingency Planning Policy
Statement...............................................14 Conduct the
Business Impact Analysis
(BIA)............................................................ 15
1. 3.2.1 Determine Business Processes and Recovery
Criticality..............................16
2. 3.2.2 Identify Resource Requirements
...................................................................19
3. 3.2.3 Identify System Resource Recovery Priorities
..............................................19
Identify Preventive Controls
...................................................................................... 19
Create Contingency Strategies
................................................................................. 20
Supporting
Information.............................................................................
................. 35 Activation and Notification Phase
............................................................................. 36
1. 4.2.1 Activation Criteria and
Procedure..................................................................36
2. 4.2.2 Notification Procedures
8. .................................................................................36
3. 4.2.3 Outage Assessment
...................................................................................... 38
Recovery
Phase......................................................................................
.................. 39 4.3.1 Sequence of Recovery
Activities...................................................................39
vi
4.4 4.5
Chapter 5.
5.1
5.2 5.3 5.4
5.5
2. 4.3.2 Recovery
Procedures..............................................................................
......39
3. 4.3.3 Recovery Escalation and
Notification............................................................40
Reconstitution Phase
...............................................................................................
. 41 Plan Appendices
...............................................................................................
........ 42
Technical Contingency Planning
Considerations.....................................43
Common Considerations
.......................................................................................... 43
1. 5.1.1 Use of the BIA
...............................................................................................
44
2. 5.1.2 Maintenance of Data Security, Integrity, and
Backup....................................44
3. 5.1.3 Protection of Resources
................................................................................ 46
4. 5.1.4 Adherence to Security Controls
..................................................................... 46
9. 5. 5.1.5 Identification of Alternate Storage and Processing
Facilities.........................46
6. 5.1.6 Use of High Availability (HA)
Processes........................................................48
Client/Server Systems
..............................................................................................
48
1. 5.2.1 Client/Server Systems Contingency
Considerations.....................................49
2. 5.2.2 Client/Server Systems Contingency
Solution
s ..............................................51
Telecommunications Systems
.................................................................................. 52
1. 5.3.1 Telecommunications Contingency
Considerations........................................53
2. 5.3.2 Telecommunications Contingency