This document provides instructions for a Week 5 CEA Project assignment. Students are asked to revise their Week 3 paper based on instructor feedback, add two additional scholarly articles to the literature review section, research and analyze an additional law or regulation, research and summarize at least two additional related cases, and write a summary/conclusion section. The paper should be 10-14 pages following APA format. Feedback from the instructor on the Week 3 submission is provided, noting that the student completed all tasks but could provide more in-depth analysis and ensure full citation of sources. Overall, the work was well-done but some sections lacked full citation and references. The instructor encourages the student to review the rubric and ask any questions.

1. Week
5 CEA Project
Assignment
Task: Submit to complete this assignment
Due May 31 at 11:59 PM
MBA5005 Individual Project
Week 5 Deliverables
This week, you will revise the first part of the paper according
to your instructor’s comments. You will add additional articles,
laws, cases and summary as outlined below. You will then
combine all information and submit the final paper using the
instructions provided.
Revisions
Revise the paper submitted in Week 3.
Literature Review
For Week 5, locate two additional scholarly articles related to
your topic. Summarize the articles in your own words and
explain how they are related to your topic. Do not use published

2. cases for this section. You must use scholarly articles from the
South University Online Library. Legal journals may provide
some of the best sources of information. Westlaw Campus
Research is a good option for finding legal information in law
journals. When you combine this section with Week 3, you will
have a total of at least four articles.
Laws and Regulations
Research and analyze one additional law or regulation related to
the topic you selected. The information may require research of
federal and/or state laws, as well as administrative agency laws.
Summarize the information about the law or regulation you
found and explain how it applies to your topic. When you
combine this section with Week 3, you will have a minimum of
two laws or regulations. Depending on the topic, you may
compare the laws of two states For example, if you are writing
about gender discrimination, compare the federal law with law
from one of the states that also provides protection at the state
level. States often provide more protection than the federal law.
Cases
Research at least two additional published cases (lawsuits)
related to the topic you selected. Summarize the cases in your
own words and explain how they are related to your topic.
Provide a summary that includes the name of the case, state or
federal court, issue, summary of events and ruling. Explain
whether you agree or disagree with the court’s decision.
Combine the case from Week 3 with this section for a total of
three cases.

3. Summary/Conclusion
As an ending to your paper, summarize what you have learned.
Assess and communicate what you believe the future holds as it
relates to your topic.
If applicable, discuss how you might apply what your learned to
your personal or professional life.
Add the parts from Week 3 and submit your final paper in
accordance with the formatting instructions provided.
Formatting Instructions
Submit a 10 to 14-page paper about the topic selected.
The paper should consist of a cover page, short introduction,
explanation of the legal issue, literature review, analysis of
related laws or regulations, reviews of cases, summary of
information learned and application to your professional life,
and a separate reference page.
Use APA format for the paper. Review the APA materials
located in the Library Research Guide.
Name your document
SU_MBA5005_W5_LastName_FirstInitial.doc
Submission Details:
Support your responses with examples.
Cite any sources in APA format.

4. Submit the paper to the Submissions Area by the due date
assigned.
Week 3 Paper
The effects of incarceration on health
Introduction
The history of the concept of prisons has been utilized
incarceration of people and denial of freedom. Penitentiaries
were often utilized as a impermanent stopgap prior to the
condemning to death or life bondage; however, as time-lapse
and advancement take place, the prisons have started
transforming into the correctional facilities with the engineering
of the concepts of rehabilitation and three formations of the
politico prisoners, enemies of government and Prisoners of War.
The United States Criminal Justice System and the criminal law
are some of the drivers of the well-being inequalities that
impact communities' wellbeing around the nation. As one of the
mechanisms utilized in criminal justice, mass incarceration has
both direct and unintended impacts on the well-being of
personalities and populations.
The well-being disparities witnessed among the people who
have experienced incarceration concerning their own but
become even so when one recognizes that marginalized
communities are more likely to interact with the United States
legal system (Mei, 2019). The United States legal system is
characterized by specific populations having a higher
probability of being incarcerated and struggle with well-being
issues associated with the process. Mass incarceration is a
critical determinant of well-being, especially in the United
States, which comprises the largest number of people in

5. incarceration centers worldwide. This research aims to
determine the various well-being impacts of mass incarceration
both to the inmates, the families, and the general community.
Literature review
The work of (Mark, Katherine, Ava, Monica, and Sandro, 2015)
examined whether the resident in the neighborhood where there
are high levels of mass imprisonment is related to psychiatric
indisposition among the non-incarcerated communal members.
The others demonstrated but incarcerations have capacities to
exercise collateral damages on the psychological well-being of
individual foods with high levels of any cancellations and
demonstrated that the detrimental well-being impacts of mass
imprisonment go yonder those who are incarcerated. The
research on the well-being repercussions of incarceration is
deemed to fall into two broad categories. One focuses on the
individuals directly involved in the prisons, and the second one
on the community's close friends and family members.
Article summary
The first article considered for the summary has titled the
effects of confinement and reentry on Albert's communal well-
being and wellbeing in 2019. The focus of the study was to
determine the drivers of mass incarceration and the various
well-being impacts related to mass incarceration, including
physical and mental wellbeing. The author demonstrates that
there are diverse Direct and indirect impacts on the well-being
of individual's families and groups as mass incarceration is
argued to be a foremost social determining factor of wellbeing
(National Academies Press (U.S.), 2019). The peace concluded
that mass incarceration is characterized by huge racial
disparities, with the African Americans have a probability of
3.6 times more likely to be incarcerated than the white. The
association between deficiency and incarceration was discussed

6. as predictable and quite disturbing as the American prisons are
filled with individuals who have been shot out of the economy
lacking quality education, and with many more chances of
accessing good jobs. The authors suggested that the
interventions were made before individuals are imprisoned,
during law enforcement, in the preliminary detention. In court,
appearances should be utilized to mitigate the adverse well-
being effects of mass incarceration.
The second article considered for the summary is titled city of
inmates, conquest, rebellion, and rice of human Cajun in Los
Angeles Albert by Kelly in 2017. The piece has demonstrated
that the United States, in the 20th century, is embarking upon a
historically unprecedented and globally and parallel boom in
imprisonment. Los Angeles is argued to be incarcerating more
people than any other city in the United States, which imprisons
a higher number of people than any other nation on the globe.
Some of the factors that made Los Angeles the capital city of
the world incarceration sentence included the immigrant
exclusions and the black's disappearances (Hernández, 2017).
The article summarizes that missing cancellations are used to
exacerbate racial disparities and further support discrimination
against minority communities, which has multiple adverse well-
being repercussions, especially psychological issues on minority
communities.
Laws and regulations
The increase in the utilization of imprisonment as a response to
criminal activities reflects a clear policy choice. In the 1980s
and 1990s, the United States federal legislation the governors
and the president signed laws which were intended to guarantee
worth most of the criminals convicted would end up being
imprisoned and got the prison term for various offenses would
be longer than in the earlier periods (Wang & Flores-Lagunes,
2020). In the act of 1994, I know who each entered the state

7. application for a federal grant for prison construction was
required to demonstrate that the state was increasing the
percentage of convicted offenders sentenced to prison. In 1973,
criminal sentences, often referred to as law without order
demonstrated that the American sentencing black standards for
sentencing decisions and opportunity appeal. The system could
not keep its promises in rehabilitative mechanisms as it only
ended up with racial disparities.
Cases
In the case of Wolff McDonnell in 1974, it w s held that the
prisoners retained rights to some due process while
incarcerated. The Supreme Court demonstrated that the due
process would call for the prison disciplinary actions and
conclusions to revoke the good time credits. The court
demonstrated that due process requires that inmates have to be
accompanied a chance to ac for witnesses and present evidence
and a written statement that offers in-depth information on the
offenses committed and the evidence.
In 1974, McDonnell, an inmate at Nebraska penal and a
complex disciplinary field, a case complaining against the
prison disciplinarians and proceedings, was biased. The
inspections of the inbound and the outbound emails were
unreasonable, and there was an absence of legal assistance for
the inmates. At the time, the prisoners would only get an oral
report regarding the nature of charges against them and did not
have a chance of cross-examining their cases or even presenting
their witnesses ("Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974),"
n.d.). Even though the court denied the arguments that the
convicts were entirely denied their privileges, the court
concluded that inmates were eligible for an on paper
communication of violations, for instance, one day prior to
hearings and a written declaration from the board concerning
the shreds of substantiation utilized and the causes for the

8. penalizing hearings.
References
Hernández, K. L. (2017). Conclusion upriver in the age of mass
incarceration. City of Inmates. Doi: 10.5149/north
Carolina/9781469631189.003.0008
Mark, Katherine, Ava, Monica and Sandra. (2015). the
collateral damage of mass incarceration: Risk of psychiatric
morbidity among Nonincarcerated residents of high-
incarceration neighborhoods. Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4265900/
Mei, K. S. (2019). Bernice Chauly, incantations /
Incarcerations. Southeast Asian Review of English, 56(2), 175-
177. doi:10.22452/sare.vol56no2.16
National Academies Press (US). (2019, September 18). Mass
incarceration as a public wellbeing issue - The effects of
incarceration and reentry on community wellbeing and well-
being - NCBI bookshelf. Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555719/
Wang, X., & Flores-Lagunas, A. (2020). Conscription and
military service: Do they result in future violent and non-
violent incarcerations and recidivism? Journal of Human
Resources, 0418-9449R2. doi:10.3368/jhr.58.1.0418-9449r2
Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974). (nod). Retrieved
from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/539/
Professors feedback

9. Overall Feedback
Thanks so much for your efforts in the week 3 assignment
which is an individual legal research paper. We provided you
with a listing of topics that you could select from all the way
from medical marijuana to the investment laws of your state or
you could have chosen your own topic if you so wish. As with
every paper we require that you properly formatted and properly
cite and reference the work. In this paper we need to see and
Introduction, background about the topic selected and why it
was selected. Also, please know that this is related to the week
five submission. We also require a Literature Review which
identifies information that is already known about a research
topic. For this assignment you are required to locate two
scholarly articles related to your topic. We then require that
you perform research on the Laws and Regulations and analyze
one law or regulation related to the topic you selected and to
summarize the information about the law or regulation you
found and explain how it applies to your topic. We also
require that you find case law at least one published case
(lawsuit) that is related to the topic you selected and to
summarize the case in your own words and explain how it is
related to your topic. Provide a summary that includes the
name of the case, state or federal court, issue, summary of
events and ruling. Explain whether you agree or disagree with
the court’s decision. We would then like to see some type of
conclusion or wrap-up statement to your 4 to 6-page paper about
this topic. As always APA formatting is required as is full
citation and referencing of all the information as well as a
separate cover page and a separate page for references. Overall
you have done some excellent work here you have performed all
the tasks that were asked of you and provided a great overview
of the laws the casework as well as your thoughts on the
outcome of these cases. You’ve done some good analysis and
provided an excellent overview of the intricacies of this legal

10. issue, but we were seeking a bit more depth to the analysis
where you truly look at both sides of the issues before truly
settling on a solution or conclusion. So, you did lose a few
points on the various sections of the rubrics but overall you
have done some great work. The work seems to be well cited in
some sections of this paper, but other sections seem to be
lacking full citation and references, so you did lose a few
points. APA formatting is used throughout including headers
and titles great work there. Overall you have done some good
work on this paper please see the rubrics and if you have any
questions or would like me to go over this in more depth please
let me know.