This document discusses EMC hazards and how to avoid them in instrumentation design. It covers different types of EMI and EMS hazards such as conducted emission hazards, radiated emission hazards, conducted susceptibility hazards, and ESD hazards. It provides tips for EMC hazard design regarding immunity to ESD, surge, EFT, and voltage dips. The document also discusses following best practices in the design process such as considering EMC in specifications, architecture, rules, and pre-compliance testing. PCB architecture considerations like layering and isolation are presented.
5. EMI Hazards
Radiated Emission
Due to Ferrite
Due to Enclosure and Air gaps
Due to ventilation and ventilation fans
Due to Environment
6. EMC Hazard Design – Immunity
ESD – Electro Static Discharge
Due to Enclosure Martials & Environment Humidity
Surge Immunity
Due to Selection of MOV and place of Installation
PFMF –Power Frequency Magnetic Field
Due to Field of Installation & Environment of
Installation
Voltage Dips & Short Interruption
Due to Input supply to the “EUT”
7. EFT – Design Hazard
Embedded controllers are designed to generate and act on signals such as high-speed serial
communication clocks that have timing specifications comparable to that of transient-
induced noise. Therefore, transient-induced noise is likely to interfere with these signals. In
a broad classification, the following blocks, pins, and signals are most influenced by
transient-induced noise:
Power and ground signals
Reset circuits
Clock/oscillator signals
Edge-sensitive triggers
High-frequency digital signals
Analog signals
Communication blocks such as I2C, SPI, UART
CPU
Flash/RAM
transient-induced noise affects one or more of these blocks, the following types of system
failures can occur:
Reset
Latch-Up
8. The Design Process
Concept the idea
Target specifications the details (include functional and regulatory
- EMC)
System architecture the structure and details - EMC
Design rules the circuit and layout constraints- EMC
Initial design build it
Functional evaluation does it work? If not, modify.
Regulatory evaluation is it legal? If not modify - EMC
Release it meets the (modified) specs.
9. The Design Process
Target specifications the details (include
functional and regulatory - EMC)
- Are all the jurisdictions
specified?
- Have the requirements
changed?
- Is the environment correct?
10. The Design Process
System architecture the structure and details – EMC
-How many layers in PCBs?
-Are reactive circuits located away from I/O ports?
-Are I/O ports isolated/shielded?
-Are IC families appropriate for speeds needed?
-Will housing provide shielding?
11. Design for compliance
Initial Design must consider the following:
design goals
Components
PCB architecture
PCB layout and I/O
Cables
enclosures and shielding
software/firmware
12. Design for compliance
Design rules the circuit and layout constraints –EMC
- Are RF signal traces short and/ or embedded?
- Are bypass caps located and sized optimally?
- Are ground planes low-Z, and earth bypass provided?
- Have sensitive designs been modeled?
-Consider use of Signal Integrity and Quiet expert, EMC
Flo simulation tools
13. Design for compliance
Design for robustness:
- checkpoint routines and watchdog timers.
- checksums, error detection/correction codes.
- “sanity checks” of measured values.
- poll status of ports, sensors, actuators.
- read/write to digital ports to validate.
14. Design for compliance
To increase the EMC success rate, the design process must have following
checks:
- Be sure the regulatory specifications are correct and current.
- Take into account the impact of equipment architecture
on EMC. Assure that purchased modules also comply.
- Consider EMC design rules, manual and/or automatic.
- Include places for EMC compliance modifications.
- Perform pre-compliance testing where possible.
15. Design for compliance
Regulatory evaluation is it legal? If not modify – EMC
- Were places provided for optional
filtering/bypassing?
- Are ferrites cost-effective?
- Can spring fingers be added to the enclosure?
- Will a shielded cable help?
- Board re-spin?
16. Design for compliance
EMI increases with power consumption
EMI increases with slew rate/clock
speed
EMI increases with ground bounce
EMI increases with output loading
Differential drive can reduce EMI
(LVDS)
17. Design for compliance: PCB architecture
Adjacent ground and power planes act as very
good decoupling capacitors.
ground and power planes can shield high-speed
or low-level signal traces between.
separate ground and chassis planes can reduce
noise.
16-planes (layers) design is common for back
planes
18. Pre-compliance tools
To pre-test for RF immunity:
use licensed transmitters for radiated fields.
use coupling networks and transformers for
conducted disturbances.
To mitigate RF immunity problems:
try ferrites and spring fingers above 50 MHz
try filters below 50 MHz, bypassing anywhere.
19. Pre-compliance EMI sites
1 m site
minimizes factory ambient.
good for small EUT, frequencies > 100 MHz.
Screened room
inexpensive, OK for regulatory conducted emissions
and conducted immunity tests.
Can be used for radiated emissions, with precautions.
20. My Profile
• Dr.R .Lenin Raja M.E., Ph.D (RF & Antenna)
• Director- Technical – ISRL
• Editor -Member:
• Carthage Science Publishing – RF & Microwave Engineering (The
Netherlands)
• Electronics & Antenna Engineering – World Academy of Science &
Technology –USA
• Contact : +91-8870082081
• leninaucbe@gmail.com; lenin.research@gmail.com