INTRODUCTION
TO DEFINE ICP
TO ENLIST FACTORS CAUSING INC ICP
TO ENLIST INDICATION ANDCONTRA INDICATION OF ICP MONITORING
TO BRIEF CONSIQUENCIES OF INC ICP
TO EXPLAIN ASSESSMENT OF INC ICP
TO BRIED WARNING SIGN OF ICPMONITORING
TO EXPLAIN VARIOUS INVASIVE AND NON INVASIVE METHOD OF ICP MONITORING
3. OBJECTIVES
INTRODUCTION
TO DEFINE ICP
TO ENLIST FACTORS CAUSING INC ICP
TO ENLIST INDICATION ANDCONTRA INDICATION OF ICP MONITORING
TO BRIEF CONSIQUENCIES OF INC ICP
TO EXPLAIN ASSESSMENT OF INC ICP
TO BRIED WARNING SIGN OF ICPMONITORING
TO EXPLAIN VARIOUS INVASIVE AND NON INVASIVE METHOD OF ICP
MONITORING
4. HISTORICAL REVIEW
1. Understanding of the CSF circulation — MAGENDIE who described a
small foramen in the floor of the fourth ventricle 175 years ago.
2. ALEXANDER MONRO &GEORGE KELLIE((1823- 24,Scotland) )
defined closed box concept
3. 1891 QUINKE introduced LP allowing CSF sampling & measurement
4. 1900 CUSHING describes the classic Triad seen with severely elevated
ICP
5. 1960 LUNDBERG introduced long term continuous ICP monitoring
via an indwelling intraventricular catheter.
5. INTRODUCTION
1. The skull is a rigid structure.
2. It contains:
Brain – 80-85% 1300-1750 mls
Blood 5-8%
Cerebro spinal fluid (CSF) 8-12%
6. NORMAL CSF
Average intracranial volume : 1400 to 1700 ml
CSF occupies about 150 ml : 10 percent approx.
Rate of formation : 0.35ml/min = ~20ml/hour =
~500ml/day
Renewed 3 – 4 times a day
Sites of production Choroidal plexus : 70-80 percent
Extra-choroidal : 20-30 percent
9. COMPENSATORY MECHANISMS FOR
EXPANDING MASSES
Immediate
Decrease in CSF volume by movement of fluid to the lumbar area.
Decrease in the blood volume by squeezing blood out of sinuses
Delayed
Decrease in the extra-cellular fluid.
10. DEFINITION
INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE (ICP) is the pressure inside the
skull and thus in the brain tissue and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
Normal range 5 – 15 mm Hg
INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE (ICP)
Increased ICP is defined as a sustained elevation in pressure above
20mm of Hg
11. LEVELS ICP In mmHg
Normal 5-15
Mild 16-20
Moderate 21-30
Severe 31-40
Very severe 41 and above
12. FACTORS CAUSING INC ICP
Cerebral Oedema
Vasogenic
Cytotoxic oedema
Post-Cardiac Arrest
Inflammatory—Meningitis/Encephalitis
Intra Cranial Space Occupying Lesions
Enlarged ventricular system
Pneumocephalus
Increase in C.B.F.
Impaired cerebral venous drainage
13. INDICATION OF ICP MONITORING
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS ) < 8
Posturing (extension, flexion)
Bilateral or unilateral pupil dilation (except with Epidural
Hematomas)
CT Scan results showing edema and/or mid-line shift
Physical assessment /neurological assessment findings which
indicate a need for monitoring
15. CONSEQUENCES
Internal herniation:- Temporal lobe is
pushed down though Tentorium in cisura
External herniation:- Cerebellar tonsills/
peduncle herniate through foramen
magnum → Compressing over IV
ventricle → ↓CPP → Death ==
“CONING”
16. ASSESSMENT OF ICP
1. THROUGH CLINICALASSESSMENT
Altered level of consciousness
Change in speech
Altered pupillary reactivity
Changes motor and sensory activities
Headache
Vomiting
Pupillary oedema
Bradycardia
Cheyne stroke respiration
Brain death
18. ICP MONITORING
The monitoring of intracranial pressure is used in treating severe
traumatic brain injury patients. This process is called intracranial
pressure monitoring. All current clinical available measurement
methods are invasive and use various transducer systems.
20. External Ventricular Drainage (EVD)/
Ventriculostomy
Gold standard test
Catheter inserted into lateral ventricles and coupled to an external
transducer through a burr hole.
In addition to measuring ICP, this technique can also be used for
drainage of CSF and administering of medicine intra- thecally, for
example, antibiotic administration in cases of ventriculitis,
possibly resulting from EVD placement itself.
Allows for removal / sampling of CSF.
Ventriculostomy has to be kept at ideal height, Targus of ear.
21.
22. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Serves a lot as a therapeutic device Accurate placement of an EVD may be
difficult
Low cost Complication includes mal position
Most accurate Occlusion
Hemorrhage
Infection
24. Prominent P1 wave :The
systolic BP is too high
Diminished P1 wave • If the
systolic BP is too low, P1
decreases and eventually
disappears, leaving only P2. •
P2 and P3 are not changed by
this.
25. ROUND ICP wave : ICP
critically high
Diminished p2 and p3 wave :
hyperventilation
26. PROMINENT P2 wave :
The mass lesion is increasing in volume
• The intracranial compliance has decreased
• An inspiratory breath hold (as ICP will also rise)
• If P2 is higher than P1 – it indicates intracranial hypertension
27. WHEN TO PULL OUT EVD?
CT evidence of reduction of cerebral oedema
Improved icp
Evd is infected
28. FIBEROPTIC INTRACRANIAL
PRESSURE MONITOR
Fiberoptic devices for ICP monitoring in which the catheter tip
measures the amount of light reflected off a pressure-sensitive
diaphragm .
The most widely studied fiberoptic device is the Camino
fiberoptic ICP monitoring device
The sensor is placed within the ventricles of a brain tissue and
provides a direct measurement of brain pressure
29. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Ease of insertion- right frontal Zero drift.(Recalibration cannot be
performed 2 mm Hg (first 24 hrs); 1 mm
Hg (first 5 days) – Manufacturer 0.5 – 3.2
mm Hg drift – Actual)
Can be inserted in severely compressed
ventricles or those with midline shift
Mechanical problems (breakage or
dislocation of fibrooptic cables )
Accuracy
low complication rate
30. THE SUBARACHNOID SCREW (BOLT)
A subdural screw or bolt is a hollow screw that is
inserted through a hole drilled in the skull. It is
placed through dura mater.
This allows the sensor to record from inside the
subdural space.
It is placed just through the skull between the
arachnoid membrane and cerebral cortex
It does not allow for CSF drainage but ideal for mild
to moderate head injury
It can easily converted to ventriculostomy if the
patient decompensate.
31. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Does not penetrate the brain It is unable to drain CSF
Lower risk of infection than the
intraventricular catheter
The accuracy is questionable
It is easier to place
32. MINIATURE STRAIN GAUGE
TRANSDUCER
It has a microchip pressure sensor at the tip of a flexible nylon
cable that produces different electricity based on pressure.
33. Advantages
• can be placed in various compartments, including the
ventricle, parenchyma, and subdural space
Disadvantages
• Less accurate.
34. SPIEGELBERG PARENCHYMAL
TRANSDUCER
Using an Air-Pouch mounted in the tip region of a dual lumen
probe.
One lumen transmits the pressure to the Brain-Pressure Monitor.
The second lumen is used for drainage of CSF.
35. SPIELBERG COMPLIANCE MONITOR
Compliance is defined as change in volume per unit change in
pressure
A low compliance state means that a small change in volume lead
to a large change in pressure
Inverse relationship between compliance and ICP
To measure compliance, the monitor injects a small amount of air
into the air balloon pouch and measures the pressure response to
this change in volume
37. OPTIC NERVE SHEATH DIAMETER
(ONSD)
ONSD , which can be measured by ultrasound,
correlates with ICP.
demonstrated a strong linear relationship between
ONSD and ICP.
But the critical value of ONSD for detecting
elevated ICP (ICP >20 mm Hg) is different in the
various studies, thus limiting its potential use at this
time
38. TECHNIQUE:
Select the high frequency linear array probe.
Apply ultrasound gel liberally to the closed eyelid.
Resting the probe hand on a bony structure such as the forehead or brow ridge
Stabilizes the image and lowers the risk of inadvertent pressure on the globe.
Place the ultrasound probe lightly over the gel in a transverse orientation
initially.
Both the eye should be scanned, in case of unilateral papilledema
First locate a point 3mm in posterior to the optic disk at this point place the
calipers at 90degree to the axis of optic nerve to measure the diameter of optic
nerve.
ONSD Measurement Common cut-off is 5 mm
39. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Reproducibility of measurements Lack of a uniform cut-off value
Portability of equipment Operator dependent
The non-invasive nature of the technique
Potential risk of pressure injury to the
globe
Rapid performance
Avoidance of ionising radiation
Avoidance of patient transport for imaging
Relatively low costs
Ready availability of equipment
40. VENOUS OPHTHALMODYNAMOMETRY
It, which measures venous opening pressure (VOP), to calculate
ICP.
Drawback -requires dilation of the pupil to perform the
measurement.
Both ONSD and VOP measurement can be performed only
intermittently and therefore can be used just as a screening tool
for ICP elevation rather than as a continuous monitor.
41. TYMPANIC MEMBRANE DISPLACEMENT
TMD gives an idea of Cochlear fluid pressure acts as a
surrogate for ICP.
High cochlear fluid pressure causes an inward- directed
movement of the tympanic membrane, low cochlear fluid
pressure causes an outward movement. This movement is
measured as the mean volume displacement , But less
accurate.
42. TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER
Measuring ICP based also on changes in patterns of blood flow
velocity in the intracranial arteries, which can be assessed by
TCD
The Middle Cerebral Artery is considered a biologic pressure
transducer whose vessel wall deflects in response to mural
pressure , modulating according to the pulsatile waveform of CBF
ICP can be derived with various mathematical models by using
various blood flow velocity data & variations in TCD waveform
morphologies
43. VEP (VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL)
Delay in visual evoked potentials is observed patient with raised
ICP
44. SUMMARY
DEFINE ICP
FACTORS CAUSING INC ICP
INDICATION AND CONTRA INDICATION
CONSIQUENCIES
ASSESSMENT OF INC ICP
VARIOUS INVASIVE AND NON INVASIVE METHOD OF ICP MONITORING
45. BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Basvanthappa B.T”MEDICAL SURGICAL NURSING”1st edition , 2005 Jaypee
Brothers Publications, NewDelhi,Page No.1142-1144.
2. Black J.M. Hawk, J.H. (2005) Medical Surgical Nursing Clinical Management for
Positive Outcomes. (7th ed) Elsevier. Page No.986-990 .
3. Chintamani Lewis”MEDICAL SURGICAL NURSING ”South Asia edition 2nd
volume 2015,Elseiver Publication,Page No.1541.
4. Lewis, Heitkemper&Dirksen (2000) Medical Surgical Nursing Assessment and
Management of Clinical Problem (6 thed) Mosby. Page No.862
5. Phipps W.J., Long C.B. & Wood N.F. (2001) Shaffer’s Medical Surgical Nursing
B.T.Publication Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. Page No.1418-1421.