Case study Grading Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement Content 70% Advanced 92-100% Proficient 84-91% Developing 1-83% Not present 0% Total Personal Leadership Skills 14 to 15 pts Personal leadership skills and attributes needed for effective leadership and statesmanship. 12.5 to 13.5 pts Mostly discusses personal leadership skills and attributes needed for effective leadership and statesmanship. 1 to 12 pts Some discussion of personal leadership skills and attributes needed for effective leadership and statesmanship. 0 pts Lacks discussion of personal leadership skills and attributes needed for effective leadership and statesmanship. Statescraft 14 to 15 pts An understanding of the important concepts related to government structures and processes needed for effective leadership. 12.5 to 13.5 pts Mostly understands important concepts related to government structures and processes needed for effective leadership. 1 to 12 pts Somewhat understands important concepts related to government structures and processes needed for effective leadership. 0 pts Does not understand important concepts related to government structures and processes needed for effective leadership. Organization of Content 7.5 to 8 pts Organized discussion of content. 6.5 to 7 pts Mostly organized discussion of content. 1 to 6 pts Discussion of content somewhat organized. 0 pts Disorganized discussion of content. Use of Important Ideas from Readings 9.5 to 10 pts Thorough review and use of important ideas from required reading and research. 8 to 9 pts Mostly thorough review and use of important ideas from required reading and research. 1 to 7.5 pts Somewhat thorough review and use of important ideas from required reading and research. 0 pts Review is not thorough and important ideas not presented. Using real case, apply Statesmanship Model to the Public Admin Context 14 to 15 pts Detailed and relevant discussion of public administration context. 12.5 to 13.5 pts Mostly detailed and relevant discussion of public administration context. 1 to 12 pts Somewhat detailed and relevant discussion of public administration context. 0 pts Discussion of public administration context has little detail or relevance. Integrate Public Admin and Statesmanship Public Admin. Context 14 to 15 pts A logical, critical and focused discussion of how statesmanship concepts are relevant to the public administration context. 12.5 to 13.5 pts Mostly logical, critical and focused discussion of statesmanship relevance to public administration context. 1 to 12 pts Somewhat logical, critical and focused discussion of statesmanship relevance to the public administration context. 0 pts Discussion is not logical and lacks focus of how statesmanship relevance to public administration. Detailed Conceptual Applications 9.5 to 10 pts Thorough and critical review and use of important ideas on from ...

1. Case study Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
0%
Total
Personal Leadership Skills
14 to 15 pts
Personal leadership skills and attributes needed for effective
leadership and statesmanship.
12.5 to 13.5 pts
Mostly discusses personal leadership skills and attributes
needed for effective leadership and statesmanship.
1 to 12 pts
Some discussion of personal leadership skills and attributes
needed for effective leadership and statesmanship.
0 pts
Lacks discussion of personal leadership skills and attributes
needed for effective leadership and statesmanship.

2. Statescraft
14 to 15 pts
An understanding of the
important concepts related to
government structures and
processes needed for
effective leadership.
12.5 to 13.5 pts
Mostly understands important concepts related to government
structures and processes needed for effective leadership.
1 to 12 pts
Somewhat understands important concepts related to
government structures and processes needed for effective
leadership.
0 pts
Does not understand important concepts related to government
structures and processes needed for effective leadership.
Organization of
Content
7.5 to 8 pts
Organized discussion of
content.
6.5 to 7 pts
Mostly organized discussion of content.
1 to 6 pts
Discussion of content somewhat organized.

3. 0 pts Disorganized discussion of content.
Use of Important Ideas from Readings
9.5 to 10 pts
Thorough review and use of
important ideas from required
reading and research.
8 to 9 pts
Mostly thorough review and use of important ideas from
required reading and research.
1 to 7.5 pts
Somewhat thorough review and use of important ideas from
required reading and research.
0 pts
Review is not thorough and important ideas not presented.
Using real case, apply Statesmanship Model to the Public
Admin Context
14 to 15 pts
Detailed and relevant discussion of public administration
context.
12.5 to 13.5 pts
Mostly detailed and relevant discussion of public administration
context.

4. 1 to 12 pts
Somewhat detailed and relevant discussion of public
administration context.
0 pts
Discussion of public administration context has little detail or
relevance.
Integrate Public Admin and Statesmanship
Public Admin.
Context
14 to 15 pts
A logical, critical and focused
discussion of how
statesmanship concepts are
relevant to the public
administration context.
12.5 to 13.5 pts
Mostly logical, critical and focused discussion of
statesmanship relevance to public administration context.
1 to 12 pts
Somewhat logical, critical and focused discussion of
statesmanship relevance to the public administration context.
0 pts
Discussion is not logical and lacks focus of how statesmanship
relevance to public administration.

5. Detailed Conceptual Applications
9.5 to 10 pts
Thorough and critical review and use of important ideas on from
required reading and research. Vagueness is avoided in lieu of
detailed conceptual applications to specific contexts.
8 to 9 pts
Mostly thorough and critical review and use of important ideas
from required reading and research. Vagueness is mostly
avoided of detailed conceptual applications to specific contexts.
1 to 7.5 pts
Somewhat thorough and critical review and use of important
ideas from required reading and research. Vagueness is
somewhat avoided of detailed conceptual applications to
specific contexts.
0 pts
Review is not thorough and lacks criticality of important ideas
from required reading and research. Vague applications to
specific contexts.
Structure
30%
Advanced

6. 92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
0 %
Total
Use of Sources
From Course
9.5 to 10 pts
Use of all relevant sources
from the module/week and
previous modules/weeks.
8 to 9 pts
Use of most relevant sources from the module/week and
previous modules/weeks.
1 to 7.5 pts
Use of some relevant sources from the module/week and
previous modules/weeks.
0 pts
Use of no relevant sources from the module/week and
previous modules/weeks.
Outside Sources
9.5 to 10 pts
Use of 3 to 5 outside
scholarly sources.
8 to 9 pts

7. Use of 2 or 3 outside scholarly sources.
1 to 7.5 pts
Use of 1 or 2 outside scholarly sources.
0 pts
Use of no outside scholarly sources.
Pages & Spacing
4.5 to 5 pts
4 to 5 pages; double-spaced
3.5 to 4 pts.
3 to 4 pages; double-
spaced
1 to 3 pts
2 to 3 pages or not double-spaced
0 pts.
Less than 2 pages or not double-spaced
Grammar & APA
11 to 12 pts
Proper grammar and current
APA format
10 to 10.5 pts
A few grammar and APA errors

8. 1 to 9.5 pts
Several grammar and APA errors
0 pts
Grammar and APA not at graduate level
Professor Comments:
Total
/125
PADM 610
Case Study 3 Instructions
Overview:
In this case study, you will apply your Statesmanship model to a
public administration context dealing with the challenges of
planning and implementation of policy and programs.
Remember to discuss the importance of the following:
· Program Evaluation
· Policy analysis
· Conflict resolution and consensus building
· Covenant
· Statecraft
General Guidelines:
· Case Study scenarios must be taken from documented
(published) public administration contexts; no hypotheticals are
allowed. Students can focus on one particular public
administration organization or may refer to a particular
situation (well-documented by the research) that many public
administrators face.
· All ideas shared by the student must be supported with sound
reason and citations from the required readings, presentations,

9. and additional research.
· Integrate Biblical principles within the analysis of the paper.
· The paper should be 4-5 pages of content in length (not
counting the title page or references), double-spaced, and in
APA format.
· All required readings and presentations from the assigned
module must be cited.
· 3-5 additional sources must be used. This need not be
scholarly so long as they are provide relevant political and
economic analysis of your chosen nation. Wikipedia may not be
used (though certainly the student is welcome to review its
content), and informal blogs are not appropriate.
This paper is due on Sunday at 11:59 pm (EST) of Module 5.