Jeffery L. Pieters
Professor Lycan
First Year Writing Seminar EN106
02 April 2020Is Income Inequality To Blame For Poor Student Test Scores?
Studies ranging from psychology to economics all indicate that early childhood education and development are vital to the success of a child in all aspects of life, regardless of their socioeconomic status. Despite the reality that children from disadvantaged households often face more challenges and have lower test scores, publicly funded programs can have a significant and measured effect on success. Lawmakers have the responsibility to shape fiscal policy in order to bridge the gaps that face our nation's “persistently disadvantaged.” Although I agree that eligibility to qualify for free or reduced school meals is a poor measure of a student's actual needs as Susan Dynarski points out, it is important to extend these ideas to include access to quality early childhood education programs.
“A closer look reveals that the standard measure of economic disadvantage whether a child is eligible for a free or reduced-price lunch in school masks the magnitude of the learning gap between the richest and poorest children.” (Greene, Kindle Locations 11218-11220). This gap is an important aspect of the disparity in which money is distributed to schools as it can be misconstrued to divide the money based on numbers instead of actual need. The disadvantaged children are those who are in the most need for assistance both monetarily and educationally and these funds should be focused on their needs specifically instead of a school as a whole generically, though there is likely no easy way to focus this money in a specific manner. One possible way to address this need is to provide assistance and education to all children across the nation from birth regardless of financial need. Studies for years have shown that children who attend preschool are more likely to be successful throughout elementary and high school, and early childhood brain development increases intelligence levels (Untangling the Evidence). By providing this type of education and development across the board we could raise the test score of children across the nation. This would prove to be an expensive and extremely difficult task to implement universally however, we do currently have a federal program in place currently aimed at providing these types of educational programs to low income families, Head Start.
The Head Start Program is administered under the Department of Health and Human Services and provides services to pregnant women and children from birth to age five. The Head Start Program is designed to teach early learning, health education, and family well-being with the intention of promoting school readiness to these children. In fiscal year 2018, the Federal Government spent $9.47 billion dollars on this program which helped 1,050,000 children and pregnant women in 2017 and 2018 (Head Start Programs). This program is delivered nationwide ...
Poor Student Test Scores Linked to Income Inequality and Lack of Early Education
1. Jeffery L. Pieters
Professor Lycan
First Year Writing Seminar EN106
02 April 2020Is Income Inequality To Blame For Poor Student
Test Scores?
Studies ranging from psychology to economics all indicate that
early childhood education and development are vital to the
success of a child in all aspects of life, regardless of their
socioeconomic status. Despite the reality that children from
disadvantaged households often face more challenges and have
lower test scores, publicly funded programs can have a
significant and measured effect on success. Lawmakers have the
responsibility to shape fiscal policy in order to bridge the gaps
that face our nation's “persistently disadvantaged.” Although I
agree that eligibility to qualify for free or reduced school meals
is a poor measure of a student's actual needs as Susan Dynarski
points out, it is important to extend these ideas to include
access to quality early childhood education programs.
“A closer look reveals that the standard measure of economic
disadvantage whether a child is eligible for a free or reduced-
price lunch in school masks the magnitude of the learning gap
between the richest and poorest children.” (Greene, Kindle
Locations 11218-11220). This gap is an important aspect of the
disparity in which money is distributed to schools as it can be
misconstrued to divide the money based on numbers instead of
actual need. The disadvantaged children are those who are in
the most need for assistance both monetarily and educationally
and these funds should be focused on their needs specifically
instead of a school as a whole generically, though there is likely
no easy way to focus this money in a specific manner. One
possible way to address this need is to provide assistance and
education to all children across the nation from birth regardless
of financial need. Studies for years have shown that children
who attend preschool are more likely to be successful
2. throughout elementary and high school, and early childhood
brain development increases intelligence levels (Untangling the
Evidence). By providing this type of education and development
across the board we could raise the test score of children across
the nation. This would prove to be an expensive and extremely
difficult task to implement universally however, we do currently
have a federal program in place currently aimed at providing
these types of educational programs to low income families,
Head Start.
The Head Start Program is administered under the Department
of Health and Human Services and provides services to pregnant
women and children from birth to age five. The Head Start
Program is designed to teach early learning, health education,
and family well-being with the intention of promoting school
readiness to these children. In fiscal year 2018, the Federal
Government spent $9.47 billion dollars on this program which
helped 1,050,000 children and pregnant women in 2017 and
2018 (Head Start Programs). This program is delivered
nationwide through 1,600 agencies which tailor the program to
the needs of the local areas, both in centers, and homes. The
Head Start Program however was only able to serve just over
one million children and pregnant women, yet according to
www.childstats.gov there were 23.2 million children under the
age of five in 2018 alone. This one million served represents the
most needy in our nation yet provided services to only a
fraction of those who could benefit from this education.
Expanding the budget for this program in the area of childhood
education specifically would lead to a significant improvement
of test scores of all lower income and middle income families.
In addition to the Head Start Program, pre kindergarten schools
are another way that children can receive critical education
prior to entering elementary school. Yet as recently as 2017, six
states did not have state funded preschool programs, Idaho,
Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, and
Wyoming (Early Childhood Education). These programs are
funded from state budgets and local municipalities in the form
3. of bonds or other taxes. Yet despite the studies and evidence
that shows for every dollar spent in one of these programs, the
return on investment can be from two to four dollars (Cannon,
2018), some lawmakers are still hesitant to expand the budgets
from preschool programs.
According to the New York Times article by Reardon,
Waldfogel and Bassok, “Greater availability of affordable
preschool programs particularly if they are high quality may be
part of the reason poor children are starting to catch up to their
affluent peers.” (Greene, Kindle Locations 11314-11316).
Preschool is proven to increase childhood development and
helps to close the gap of test scores from lower income to upper
income children. A common thought is that a more educated
society is a more civilized society, by this thought we should be
investing heavily in education while paying the teachers much
more than they currently receive as 80% of all Head Start
teachers have a Bachelor's degree or higher. Yet if we continue
to use the qualification for free lunch as the only measure to
receive public funds we will continue to leave the most in need
children behind.
Works Cited
Cannon, Jill S., et al. “High-Quality Early Childhood Programs
Can Change Lives.” RAND
Corporation, 3 Jan. 2018,
www.rand.org/blog/rand-review/2018/01/high-quality-early-
childhood-programs-can-cha
nge-lives.html.
“Early Childhood Education.” Education Commission of the
States,
www.ecs.org/research-reports/key-issues/early-childhood-
education/.
Greene, Stuart,Lidinsky, April. From Inquiry to Academic
Writing: A Text and Reader (Kindle
Locations 11218-11220). Bedford/St. Martin's. Kindle Edition.