DR C: I reviewed your assessment this morning and I am a little confused. I am unclear if this is an organizational policy or a health policy from a government entity. The paper seems to fluctuate between the two. Can you please provide some clarity? Me: This is a health policy (consent policy). The paper summarizes the policy as described in the assessment instruction as well as speaks to what could happen if the policy is not strictly adhered to.  The letter is, however, beckoning for some reconsideration on the part of the policy that relates to research on acute illnesses as the restrictions placed by the policy can have a negative effect on patients who might suffer from these illnesses. I hope this helps.   Rodis, J. F., MD. (2011, August). Consents Policy. Retrieved from https://www.trinityhealthofne.org/documents/IRB/Consent%20Policy%20RM%202.009.pdf Reply Dr. C: Thanks for this. I will take another look this weekend. Me: Thank you! DR C FEEDBACK: The paper needs to focus on a more legal stand point of a STATE’s HEALTH POLICY. Describe the legal implication of not adhering or adhering to specific health policy. There are other better health policies you can use. I would recommend using a different policy. YOU CAN RUN YOUR POLICY BY BE PRIOR TO WORKING ON THE NEW PAPER Thank you for your hard work on this. As I mentioned in the discussion board, I am a little confused on this. This seemed to be an organizational policy rather than a health policy. There is some confusion on this though; specifically, your letter addressing a legal issue but it does not seem connected to the paper. If you are looking to get an A for this paper, please refer to the rubric to see how to obtain a maximum point of 3 for each section. Dr. C Learning Objective1.1: Describe the issue addressed by a health policy.: NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 1 Response does not fully or accurately explain the issue addressed by the policy. Additional Comments: This seemed to be an organizational policy rather than a health policy. There is some confusion on this though; specifically, your letter addressing a legal issue but it does not seem connected to the paper. REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT) Learning Objective 1.2:Explainthe background of the policy formulation.: NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 1 Adequate background of the policy’s formulation is not provided. Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT) Learning Objective 2.1:Describe key stakeholders involved in the formulation of a health policy.: MEETS EXPECTATIONS 2 Key stakeholders identified include advocacy groups, providers, payers, suppliers, organizations, and consumers, (as appropriate). Response explains why each identified stakeholder has an interest in this policy. Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT) Learning Objective 2.2: Categorize health policy stakeholders as advocacy groups or business interests.: MEETS EXPECTATIONS 2 Stakeho.

1. DR C: I reviewed your assessment this morning and I am a little
confused. I am unclear if this is an organizational policy or a
health policy from a government entity. The paper seems to
fluctuate between the two. Can you please provide some clarity?
Me: This is a health policy (consent policy). The paper
summarizes the policy as described in the assessment
instruction as well as speaks to what could happen if the policy
is not strictly adhered to. The letter is, however, beckoning for
some reconsideration on the part of the policy that relates to
research on acute illnesses as the restrictions placed by the
policy can have a negative effect on patients who might suffer
from these illnesses. I hope this helps.
Rodis, J. F., MD. (2011, August). Consents Policy. Retrieved
from
https://www.trinityhealthofne.org/documents/IRB/Consent%20P
olicy%20RM%202.009.pdf
Reply
Dr. C: Thanks for this. I will take another look this weekend.
Me: Thank you!
DR C FEEDBACK: The paper needs to focus on a more legal
stand point of a STATE’s HEALTH POLICY. Describe the legal
implication of not adhering or adhering to specific health
policy. There are other better health policies you can use. I
would recommend using a different policy. YOU CAN RUN
YOUR POLICY BY BE PRIOR TO WORKING ON THE NEW
PAPER
Thank you for your hard work on this. As I mentioned in the
discussion board, I am a little confused on this. This seemed to
be an organizational policy rather than a health policy. There is
some confusion on this though; specifically, your letter
addressing a legal issue but it does not seem connected to the

2. paper. If you are looking to get an A for this paper, please refer
to the rubric to see how to obtain a maximum point of 3 for
each section.
Dr. C
Learning Objective1.1: Describe the issue addressed by a health
policy.:
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1
Response does not fully or accurately explain the issue
addressed by the policy.
Additional Comments: This seemed to be an organizational
policy rather than a health policy. There is some confusion on
this though; specifically, your letter addressing a legal issue but
it does not seem connected to the paper.
REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST
POINT)
Learning Objective 1.2:Explainthe background of the policy
formulation.:
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1
Adequate background of the policy’s formulation is not
provided.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 2.1:Describe key stakeholders involved in
the formulation of a health policy.:
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2
Key stakeholders identified include advocacy groups, providers,
payers, suppliers, organizations, and consumers, (as
appropriate).
Response explains why each identified stakeholder has an
interest in this policy.

3. Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 2.2: Categorize health policy stakeholders
as advocacy groups or business interests.:
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2
Stakeholders are accurately placed into two categories:
advocacy groups and business interests.
Rationale is provided for the categorizations.
Explanation is provided as to why these categorizations matter.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 2.3: Explain the diverse perspectives of key
stakeholders involved in the evolution of the policy.:
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2
Response accurately and fairly explains the diverse perspectives
of four key stakeholders with regard to the health policy.
Response provides one rationale for each stakeholder
perspective.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 3.1: Describe the role of government
agencies in the formulation and implementation of a health
policy.:
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1
Response insufficiently addresses the role of specific
government agencies and officials in the formulation of this
policy.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

4. Learning Objective 3.2: Explain the diverse perspectives of the
government agencies and officials with regard to the policy.:
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1
Response does not adequately and/or accurately explain the
diverse perspectives of the government agencies and officials
with regard to the policy.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 4.1: Describe the role of law and regulation
in the formulation and implementation of a health policy.:
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1
Response identifies fewer than four accurate examples of the
role of law and regulation in the formulation and
implementation of the health policy.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 5.1: Identify key organizational
stakeholders impacted by a health policy:
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2
Response identifies at least five organizational stakeholders
who will be impacted by the policy.
Response provides rationale for selecting these five
stakeholders and describes how they will be impacted.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 5.2: Explain the overarching diverse
perspectives of the organizational stakeholders with regard to
the policy.:
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2

5. Response accurately and fairly explains the diverse perspectives
of the organizations and stakeholders with regard to the policy.
Response provides one rationale for each perspective.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 5.3: Analyze the impact of the policy on
organizational stakeholders.:
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2
Response identifies three areas within the organization that will
be most impacted by the policy.
Response provides rationale for selecting these three areas,
including a description of how these areas will be impacted.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 6.1: Explain the relevance of a health policy
to an organization.:
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1
Response provides fewer than three points of relevance of the
policy to the organization and/or insufficient rationale.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)
Learning Objective 6.2: Describe the expected impact of a
policy on organizational outcomes.:
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2
Response identifies four organizational outcomes that will be
impacted by the health policy.
Response explains how these outcomes will be impacted by the
policy.
Additional Comments: REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO
ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST POINT)

6. Written Communication PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling,
and mechanics.:
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2
Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American
English.
Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively
impact readability.
Additional Comments: There were some minor writing issues.
REFER TO RUBRIC ON HOW TO ACHIEVE A 3 (HIGHEST
POINT)
Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance
clarity.:
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3
Writing is consistently well-organized. Introductions,
transitions, and conclusions are used effectively to enhance
clarity, cohesion, and flow.
Additional Comments:
Written Communication PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written
work.:
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure,
formatting, etc., are applied correctly and consistently
throughout the paper. Sources are consistently cited
appropriately and accurately.
Additional Comments:
Critical Thinking PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies.:
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3
Response clearly and comprehensively assesses the

7. reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.
Response provides a detailed and compelling analysis of
implications of fallacies and logical weaknesses in a given
argument.
Additional Comments:
Critical Thinking PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate
assumptions.:
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3
Response justifies the reasonableness and need for assumptions
in an original argument.
Additional Comments:
Critical Thinking PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and
alternatives.:
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3
Response justifies selection of chosen alternative relative to
others.
Additional Comments:
Critical Thinking PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills.:
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3
Response presents compelling supporting arguments for
proposed solutions.
Additional Comments:
Information Literacy PS 6.1: Identify credible sources.:
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3
All resources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the
topic.
Additional Comments:

8. Information Literacy PS 6.2: Analyze findings from relevant
sources.:
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3
Analysis clearly reflects relevance of findings to the identified
problem, issue, or purpose, and synthesizes findings to generate
new insights.
Additional Comments:
©2014 Walden University 1
LE004: Analyzing Policies From Diverse Perspectives: Analyze
a policy from the diverse perspectives of policymakers, interest
groups, healthcare
administrators, and other stakeholders to assess impact on an
organization.
Assessment Rubric
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations

9. Part I: Policy Assessment
Sub-Competency 1: Explain the formulation of a health policy.
Learning Objective 1.1:
Describe the issue
addressed by a health
policy.
Response is missing. Response does not fully or
accurately explain the issue
addressed by the policy.
Response accurately and
succinctly describes the
issue addressed by the
policy.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response describes
relevant current issues or
ongoing concerns related
to this policy.
Learning Objective 1.2:
Explain the background
of the policy
formulation.

10. Response is missing. Adequate background of
the policy’s formulation is
not provided.
Response provides
adequate and succinct
background of the policy’s
formulation.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response uses one or more
examples of the policy in
action to demonstrate an
understanding of
formulation of health
policy at state or federal
level.
Sub-Competency 2: Categorize health policy stakeholders
within the context of two distinct groups: advocacy groups and
business interests.
©2014 Walden University 2
Learning Objective 2.1:
Describe key

11. stakeholders involved
in the formulation of a
health policy.
Response is missing. Response does not
adequately identify the key
stakeholders involved in a
health policy.
Key stakeholders
identified include
advocacy groups,
providers, payers,
suppliers, organizations,
and consumers, (as
appropriate).
Response explains why
each identified
stakeholder has an
interest in this policy.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response provides
additional information
about the role of advocacy
groups in the formulation
of this policy.
Learning Objective 2.2:

12. Categorize health
policy stakeholders as
advocacy groups or
business interests.
Response is missing.
Stakeholders are
inaccurately categorized as
advocacy groups or
business interests.
Insufficient or incorrect
rationale is provided for
categorizations.
Stakeholders are
accurately placed into two
categories: advocacy
groups and business
interests.
Rationale is provided for
the categorizations.
Explanation is provided as
to why these
categorizations matter.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response briefly explains

13. how advocacy groups or
business interests identify a
relevant issue/concern in
the formulation of this
policy.
Learning Objective 2.3:
Explain the diverse
perspectives of key
stakeholders involved
in the evolution of the
policy.
Response is missing. Response does not
adequately and/or
accurately explain the
diverse perspectives of four
key stakeholders.
Response accurately and
fairly explains the diverse
perspectives of four key
stakeholders with regard
to the health policy.
Response provides one
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response briefly explains
the diversity of
perspectives regarding this

14. ©2014 Walden University 3
rationale for each
stakeholder perspective.
policy from key
stakeholders.
Sub-Competency 3: Explain the role of government agencies
and officials, including public health agencies, in the
formulation and
implementation of health policy.
Learning Objective 3.1:
Describe the role of
government agencies in
the formulation and
implementation of a
health policy.
Response is missing.
Response insufficiently
addresses the role of
specific government
agencies and officials in the
formulation of this policy.
Response identifies the
key government agencies
(including public health

15. agencies) and officials
involved in the
formulation and
implementation of this
policy.
Response describes the
roles that these
government agencies and
officials played
throughout the process.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response describes two
constraints that
government agencies faced
in formulating and
implementing this policy.
Learning Objective 3.2:
Explain the diverse
perspectives of the
government agencies
and officials with
regard to the policy.
Response is missing. Response does not
adequately and/or
accurately explain the
diverse perspectives of the
government agencies and
officials with regard to the

16. policy.
Response accurately and
fairly explains the diverse
perspectives of the
government agencies and
officials with regard to the
policy.
Response provides one
rationale for each
perspective.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response briefly explains
the diversity of
perspectives regarding this
policy from government
agencies and officials.
Sub-Competency 4: Explain the role of law and regulation in the
formulation and implementation of health policy.
©2014 Walden University 4
Learning Objective 4.1:

17. Describe the role of law
and regulation in the
formulation and
implementation of a
health policy.
Response is missing.
Response identifies fewer
than four accurate
examples of the role of law
and regulation in the
formulation and
implementation of the
health policy.
Response identifies four
examples of the role of
law and regulation in the
formulation and
implementation of the
health policy.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response describes two
constraints to
implementing the policy
that arose from a legal or
regulatory perspective.

18. Sub-Competency 5: Analyze the impact of policy on
organizational stakeholders.
Learning Objective 5.1:
Identify key
organizational
stakeholders impacted
by a health policy.
Response is missing. Response identifies fewer
than five organizational
stakeholders who will be
impacted by the policy.
Rationale for selection and
description of impact is
insufficient and/or
inaccurate.
Response identifies at
least five organizational
stakeholders who will be
impacted by the policy.
Response provides
rationale for selecting
these five stakeholders
and describes how they
will be impacted.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:

19. Response indicates which
organizational stakeholder
is likely to be most
impacted by the policy and
describe examples of the
impact.
Learning Objective 5.2:
Explain the overarching
diverse perspectives of
the organizational
stakeholders with
regard to the policy.
Response is missing. Response does not
adequately and/or
accurately explain the
diverse perspectives of the
organizations and
stakeholders with regard to
the policy.
Response accurately and
fairly explains the diverse
perspectives of the
organizations and
stakeholders with regard
to the policy.
Response provides one
rationale for each
perspective.

20. Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response briefly explains
the diversity of
perspectives regarding this
policy from the
organizations and
stakeholders.
©2014 Walden University 5
Learning Objective 5.3:
Analyze the impact of
the policy on
organizational
stakeholders.
Response is not provided. Response identifies fewer
than three areas within the
organization that will be
impacted by the policy
and/or provides insufficient
description of the impact.
Response identifies three
areas within the
organization that will be
most impacted by the
policy.

21. Response provides
rationale for selecting
these three areas,
including a description of
how these areas will be
impacted.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response provides a brief
explanation of the impact
of the policy in relation to
ethics and cost-
effectiveness.
Part 2: Letter to a Policymaker
Sub-Competency 6: Summarize the impact of health policy on
an organization.
Learning Objective 6.1:
Explain the relevance of
a health policy to an
organization.
Response is missing.
Response provides fewer
than three points of
relevance of the policy to

22. the organization and/or
insufficient rationale.
Response provides three
points of relevance of the
policy to the organization.
Response provides
rationale for each of the
three points.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response describes one
constraint the policy will
place on the organization.
Learning Objective 6.2:
Describe the expected
impact of a policy on
organizational
outcomes.
Response is missing. Response identifies fewer
than four outcomes,
provides insufficient
explanation for the impact
on outcomes.
Response identifies four
organizational outcomes
that will be impacted by
the health policy.

23. Response explains how
these outcomes will be
impacted by the policy.
Demonstrates the same
level of achievement as “2”
plus the following:
Response provides at least
one example of how the
policy will have a positive
or negative impact on the
organizational outcome.
PS001: Written Communication: Demonstrate graduate-level
writing skills.
©2014 Walden University 6
0
Not Present
1
Needs Improvement
2
Meets Expectations
3
Exceeds Expectations

24. Learning Objective
PS 1.1:
Use proper grammar,
spelling, and
mechanics.
Multiple major and minor
errors in grammar,
spelling, and/or mechanics
are highly distracting and
seriously impact
readability.
Multiple minor errors in
grammar, spelling, and/or
mechanics are distracting
and negatively impact
readability.
Writing reflects competent
use of standard edited
American English.
Errors in grammar,
spelling, and/or mechanics
do not negatively impact
readability.
Grammar, spelling, and
mechanics reflect a high
level of accuracy in
standard American English
and enhance readability.

25. Learning Objective
PS 1.2:
Organize writing to
enhance clarity.
Writing is poorly organized
and incoherent.
Introductions, transitions,
and conclusions are
missing or inappropriate.
Writing is loosely
organized. Limited use of
introductions, transitions,
and conclusions provides
partial continuity.
Writing is generally well-
organized. Introductions,
transitions, and
conclusions provide
continuity and a logical
progression of ideas.
Writing is consistently
well-organized.
Introductions, transitions,
and conclusions are used
effectively to enhance
clarity, cohesion, and flow.
Learning Objective
PS 1.3:
Apply APA style to

26. written work.
APA conventions are not
applied.
APA conventions for
attribution of sources,
structure, formatting, etc.,
are applied inconsistently.
APA conventions for
attribution of sources,
structure, formatting, etc.,
are generally applied
correctly in most
instances. Sources are
generally cited
appropriately and
accurately.
APA conventions for
attribution of sources,
structure, formatting, etc.,
are applied correctly and
consistently throughout
the paper. Sources are
consistently cited
appropriately and
accurately.
Learning Objective
PS 1.4:
Use appropriate
vocabulary and tone
for the audience and
purpose.

27. Vocabulary and tone are
inappropriate and
negatively impact clarity of
concepts to be conveyed.
Vocabulary and tone have
limited relevance to the
audience.
Vocabulary and tone are
generally appropriate for
the audience and support
communication of key
concepts.
Vocabulary and tone are
consistently tailored to the
audience and effectively
and directly support
communication of key
concepts.
PS005: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: Use critical-
thinking and problem-solving skills to analyze professional
issues and inform best
practice.
©2014 Walden University 7
Learning Objective
PS 5.1:
Analyze assumptions

28. and fallacies.
Analysis of assumptions is
missing.
Response is weak in
assessing the
reasonableness of
assumptions in a given
argument.
Response does not
adequately identify and
discuss the implications of
fallacies or logical
weaknesses in a given
argument.
Response generally
assesses the
reasonableness of
assumptions in a given
argument.
Response identifies and
discusses the implications
of fallacies and/or logical
weaknesses in a given
argument.
Response clearly and
comprehensively assesses
the reasonableness of
assumptions in a given
argument.

29. Response provides a
detailed and compelling
analysis of implications of
fallacies and logical
weaknesses in a given
argument.
Learning Objective
PS 5.2:
Generate reasonable
and appropriate
assumptions.
Assumptions are missing. Response does not
adequately present and
discuss key assumptions in
an original argument.
Response presents and
discusses key assumptions
in an original argument.
Response justifies the
reasonableness and need
for assumptions in an
original argument.
Learning Objective
PS 5.3:
Assess multiple
perspectives and
alternatives.

30. Assessment of multiple
perspectives is missing.
Response does not identify
nor adequately consider
multiple perspectives or
alternatives.
Response identifies and
considers multiple
perspectives and
alternatives.
Response justifies
selection of chosen
alternative relative to
others.
Learning Objective
PS 5.4:
Use problem-solving
skills.
Problems and solutions are
not identified.
Response presents
solutions, but they are
ineffective in addressing
the specific problem.
Response presents
solutions that are practical
and work in addressing the
specific problem.

31. Response presents
compelling supporting
arguments for proposed
solutions.
PS006: Information Literacy: Apply appropriate strategies to
identify relevant and credible information and data in order to
effectively
analyze issues and make decisions.
Learning Objective
PS 6.1:
Identify credible
sources.
Credible sources are
missing.
Some sources are credible,
appropriate, and relevant
to the topic.
Most sources are credible,
appropriate, and relevant
to the topic.
All resources are credible,
appropriate, and relevant
to the topic.
©2014 Walden University 8
Learning Objective

32. PS 6.2:
Analyze findings from
relevant sources.
Analysis is missing. Analysis superficially
reflects relevance of
findings to the identified
problem, issue, or
purpose.
Analysis clearly reflects
relevance of findings to
the identified problem,
issue, or purpose.
Analysis clearly reflects
relevance of findings to
the identified problem,
issue, or purpose, and
synthesizes findings to
generate new insights.
Part 1: Policy Assessment
In a 3- to 4-page report:
· Briefly explain the issue addressed by the policy.
· Explain the background of the policy’s formulation.
· Describe key stakeholders involved in the evolution of the
policy.
· Categorize which of the stakeholders would be considered
advocacy groups and which would be classified as business
interests. Explain how you differentiate the two categories and
why this differentiation matters.
· Explain the diverse perspectives of the key stakeholder
involved in the evolution of the policy.
· Explain the role of various government agencies and officials,

33. including public health agencies, in the evolution, formulation,
and implementation of the policy.
· Briefly explain the diverse perspectives of the government
agencies and officials with regard to the policy.
· Determine the ongoing role of law and regulation in the
evolution, formulation, and implementation of the policy.
· Identify key local organizations and stakeholders impacted by
this policy.
· Briefly explain the overarching diverse perspectives of the
organizations and stakeholders with regard to the policy.
· Analyze the impact of the policy on those organizational
stakeholders.
Part 2: Letter to a Policymaker
For Part 2, identify a policymaker who is a member of the U.S.
Congress from your state of residence. If you are from a
territory, you will identify the equivalent legislative person. If
you are an international student, you may choose any person
who is responsible for enacting healthcare policies or laws in
your area. You will write a letter to the policymaker that
focuses on the organization you selected, for Part 1, in support
of or opposition to the issue you selected. Your letter should be
written in a respectful tone and focus on the evidence
supporting your position, instead of merely expressing your
personal thoughts and opinions. You must also provide evidence
from the peer-reviewed literature to support your position. The
letter should use a professional letter format, including
salutation and address.
In a 1- to 2-page letter:
· Explain the relevance of the health policy to the organization.
· Describe the expected impact of the policy on organizational
outcomes.