1. Kenneth Lester Jackson
2/4/2013

2. On January 9, 2013, Detective
Tilley of the ICAC Task Force was
monitoring internet
activity on a peer to peer
website called Gnutella. While
monitoring he noticed certain
files downloaded by a user named
“Ken,” which he knew to
constitute child pornography
through cross reference with a
federal database.
Detective Tilley was then able to
download these videos from
“Ken’s” computer. Upon doing so,
he sought a subpoena for the
subscriber IP information for user
“Ken.”

3. On January 16, 2013, the
subpoena was returned
showing that the I.P.
address was registered
to Carol Jackson with a
user name of
KENJACK1943@roadrunner
Carol Jackson had an
address in Englewood, Ohio.
Detective Tilley contacted
the Englewood Police
Department and a search
warrant was obtained on the
address.
.com

4. On Monday (dates are wrong on
report) around 10 AM, Detective
Meade responded to Ken’s address
to get a visual and physical
description of the apartment
building.
In the report, the
outside of the building was
described in detail, as was the
“While standing in the
hallway.
hallway at the front door of
Apartment 106, using my
iPhone, I checked for a WiFi signal.
I was able to
detect one locked network
under a user name of
“QuickMagnolia.”

5. On January 4 (date is wrong) Judge
Cynthia Heck was presented with a
search warrant affidavit for 124
Chestnut, Apartment 106.
Judge
Heck reviewed the affidavit and
signed the warrant.
At 3:18 pm, four police executed
the search warrant.
They knocked
on the front door and Ken
answered.
They identified
themselves as Englewood PD,
informed Ken that they had a
search warrant and asked him to
sit on the couch while they
secured the apartment.

6. While questioning Ken, a laptop
was on the table currently
downloading.
They asked Ken if
the computer belonged to him,
said yes.
he
They asked him to stand
up and to place his hands behind
his back, handcuffed him
and
explained that he was being
transported back to the police
station for further questioning.

7. The police photographed the
apartment and processed the
scene for evidence.
A Roku and a thumb drive were
found next to a tv stand,
A
pretty detailed explanation
photographed and collected as
of the apartment layout is
evidence, along with an
given in the report.
aluminum CD holder with
multiple homemade CD’s.
An Ipod media unit was found,
along with a silver Ipod,
photographed and collected.
Acer Aspire laptop, a 7 port USB
hub and two external hard drive
and other computer items.
All
were photographed and taken in for
evidence.

8. A front closet was searched and a
GPS, digital camera, cell phones,
blank photo paper, CDR’s and SD
cards were found.
All were
photographed and taken for
evidence.
A safe was found in a hall closet
and searched, no evidence was
found.
In the bedroom another Roku was
found along with another thumb
drive and GPS.
They were
photographed and collected for
evidence.

9. After collecting all of the
evidence, they cleared the scene
by leaving a copy of the search
warrant and a property sheet
showing all of the items removed
from the residence.
All evidence
was booked into
the property
room.
All of these possessions now
belong to the
State/Englewood Police
Department.

10. On February 5, Sergeant Totel started a forensic
examination of the digital evidence in the case. He
reviewed the existing case reports and search
warrant, then signed Ken’s laptop (item #6) and two
large external storage devices (Items #24 and #8).
He did not have sufficient storage resources to begin
processing the evidence, so he re-secured the
evidence until further arrangements could be made.
On February 6, he
began the process of
creating forensic
images of the
devices. He left the
process running over
the weekend, with the
evidence secured in
his office.
As he checked the
remaining digital
evidence he notated
when it was checked out
and returned to the
property room. Every
piece of evidence was
notated as to what was
done and if evidence
was found or not.

11. On February 13 & 14, a
peer to peer file was
found on the laptop and
had been used on
January 8, the same
program that originally
started the whole
process.
An undeleted file named
“7 yo showherlovingholes.ptch.avi”
was recovered. The video was 6
minutes and 10 seconds long and
contained images of a pre-teen
child, fully nude and “showing
off” her exposed vagina and anus.
An adult male is heard talking in
the video, presumably Russian. At
several points in the video, and
adult’s finger is seen touching
the child’s vagina.
Another video was about 13
minutes long, entitled “Tara 8
yo video digest” with a female
child performing fellatio on an
adult penis and the girl
performing various sex acts,
masturbating and posing nude.

12. February 11 – Grand
Jury subpoena
issued
February 14 –
Criminal Subpoena
served by Sheriff
February 14 – Indictment for
3 counts: Pandering Obscenity
involving minor (Create,
reproduce, publish)
3 counts: Pandering sex,
oriented material involving
minor (create material)

13. February 14
Warrant issued on
Indictment
February 15
Criminal Subpoena
served by sheriff
February 19
Bond set: 50,000 cash
+ EHDC
February 19
Entry plea of
Not Guilty
February 20
Appointed Counsel

14. March 29
Motion and order
for continuance
granted to
April 3
April 4
Motion and order for
continuance reset to
April 17
April 18
Entry of waiver and plea on
May 1
Judge Dennis
Adkins

15. April 17, Ken
plead guilty to
two counts of
Pandering
Obscenity
involving a
minor and one
count of
Pandering
Sexually
Oriented
Material
Involving a
minor, all
felonies of the
second degree

16. April 29
Prosecuting Attorney Mathias
Heck requests that Ken is
sentenced to a term that
exceeds the statutory
minimum, stating:
The videos at issue in this
case are not borderline
instances of child
pornography. That is
to say, the videos are not
merely depictions of naked
children. Rather, they
include graphic
sexual content of children
under the age of ten being
vaginally penetrated,
orally penetrated, and
digitally penetrated. It is
clear that all victims in
the videos are prepubescent. In fact, one
victim is initially eating
a lollipop prior to being
prodded to service an adult
male orally and
vaginally. At the end of
the video the adult
ejaculates on the child.

17. 1. The victims of the offenses
did NOT suffer any physical or
mental injury due
to the conduct of the
offender.
2. The victims of the offenses
did NOT suffer serious
physical, psychological, or
economic harm as a direct
result of these offenses.
3. The offender did NOT hold a
public office or position of
trust in the
community.
4. The offender’s occupation
did NOT oblige the offender to
prevent the offenses
or bring others committing it
to justice.
April 30
David
Turner
made the
following
reasons
why Ken
should
not go to
jail:
5. The offender’s
professional
reputation or
occupation was NOT
used to
facilitate the
offenses.
6. The offender did
NOT have a
relationship with the
victims.
7. The offender did
NOT commit the
offenses for hire or
as part of an
organized
criminal activity.
8. The offenses were
not motivated by
prejudice based on
race, ethnic
background, gender,
sexual orientation,
or religion.

18. May 2
Found guilty of one count
Pandering Obscenity Involving
Minor (Count 1)– Sentenced 2
years – Concurrent
Guilty of one
count Pandering
Obscenity
involving Minor
(Count 2) –
Sentenced 2 years
– Concurrent
Total – Two years CRC
Pandering Obscenity
Involving Minor (Count
2) – Sentenced 2 years
– Concurrent

19. May 6
Ken sentenced to the Correctional
Reception Center to be imprisoned
and confined for a term of two years
on each count to be served
concurrently.
Court finds
that Ken is
a Tier 2 sex
offender/
child victim
offender.
Ken will be supervised
by the Parole Board for
five years after his
release from prison
Ken is required to
register as a sex
offender/child
victim offender
Ken is to receive credit for
eighty-seven days spend in
confinement

20. Number: A679933
Admission Date: 5/6/2013
Institution: Correctional
Reception Center
Status:
Incarcerated
2 COUNTS - PANDER OBSCENITY INVOLVING
MINORS – Second degree felony
2 COUNTS – PANDER SEX MATERIAL
INVOLVING MINORS – Second degree
felony
Stated Prison Term: 2 years
Expiration Stated Term: 2/3/2015
Prison officials cannot reduce the
term for any reason without the
judge’s approval. There is one
exception: officials may grant
"earned credit" of one day for each
month that the inmate successfully
participates in certain prison
programs.