Argument Essay On Gun Control

Argumentative Essay On Gun Control
Marshun Jones
Ms. Wilks
English IV
I was interested in this after the recent shootings in the U.S
The gun control Act of 1968 was passed after the assassinations of both president John F. Kennedy,
the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy. It banned interstate mail orders of all
firearms, interstate handgun sales and weapons with no "sporting purpose. "It prohibited the sale of
firearms to minors, felony, fugitives, drug addicts and these committed to a mental institution. And
then allowed the sale of machine guns manufactured after May 19, 1986. The violent crime control
and law environment Act of 1994 banned the possession, transfer or domestic weapons for 10 years.
The debate over gun control in the United States has...show more content...
Gun–control advocates sought to rekindle the debate following another string of deadly mass
shootings in 2015, including the killing of nine people at a church in Charleston, South Carolina,
and 14 at a community center in San Bernardino, California. These advocates often highlight the
stricter gun laws and lower incidence of gun violence in several other democracies, like Japan and
Australia, but many others say this correlation proves little and note that rates of gun crime in the
United States have plunged over the last two decades.The current Constitution of Japan was
promulgated on November 3, 1946, and came into effect on May 3, 1947. China's expanding
military and growing assertiveness has been bolstered by weapons cloned from the arsenals of other
countries. It is not only American weapon designs and technology that have been stolen and
replicated by the Chinese. Russia has at times served as China's unwitting research and development
department. China bought two dozen of the fighters but later negotiated for a license to assemble
additional planes domestically using key components imported from Russia. Gun control in Japan,
combined with the prevailing respect for authority, has led to a more harmonious relationship
between civilians and the police than in the US. It's something of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on An Argument Against Gun Control
Argument Against Gun Control
An Argument Against Gun Control As long ago as 1789, the creators of the Constitution realized the
importance of guns in American society. The Second Amendment states,"A well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not
be infringed." No loopholes, or legal caches exist in this statement. The Founding Fathers allow for
no restriction of the private ownership of firearms. Yet, in recent years anti–gun politicians have
attempted to control guns in the name of crime prevention. Gun control makes no effort to control
criminals, does not reduce crime, takes guns from responsible sportsmen and...show more content...
Ultimately, people's choices lead them to drive recklessly, overindulge in unhealthy food, and use
firearms to commit violent crimes. So, criminals should be controlled, not the guns which they share
with millions of law–abiding citizens. Gun control supporters claim that gun control lowers crime
rate. Gun control does nothing to reduce crime. A study conducted by the Urban Institute regarding
The Clinton Gun Ban Law of 1995, finds that "because the banned guns and magazines were never
used in more than a fraction of all gun murders, even the maximum theoretically achievable
preventive effect of the ban on gun murders is almost certainly too small to detect statistically..."
Joseph Constance, the Deputy Police Chief of Trenton, New Jersey, states: "Assault weapons are
used in an underwhelming .026 of 1% of crimes in New Jersey. This means that my officers are
more likely to confront an escaped tiger from the local zoo, than to confront an assault rifle in the
hands of a drug–crazed killer on the streets." West Virginia stands as an example of the inaccurate
thinking of gun control advocates. This state has the highest number of guns per person in the
nation, yet it has the lowest number of crimes per person in the nation.
Gun control has little or no effect on crime. Gun control advocates believe that

Chance Pressley
Mrs. Gallos
English 3
21 November 2017
Gun Control
The topic of gun control is a a very talked about and subjective topic and has many different
opinions and various extremes. First off, gun control can mean anything from having background
checks or waiting periods when buying guns to taking away guns completely. Most people agree
that background checks are necessary to keep guns out of people with bad intentions hands because a
gun itself is a very neutral object and can be used for any amount of good or bad as can any other
object. However, it is much easier for a person with bad intent to hurt more people with a gun then
say a stick or another neutral object. The danger of a weapon is completely up to the person in
control of the weapon.
The first argument of people in favor of gun control is, of course, If people don't have guns, they
can't kill people (or as many people). This makes sense because most mass mass killings and
murders are a result of a person with bad intent gaining possession of a gun. However, would a
stricter gun policy really help? People against gun control think not. There are various subjective
arguments but the facts are simple, the correlation between accessibility of guns and crime with
guns, if any, is that the less accessible the guns are the higher the gun violence is. This is made
very clear with studies from other countries who have very strict gun control policies. Which only
brings us back to the idea that guns are just neutral objects and can only be controlled by the person
in possession of the weapon.
One major problem that those against gun control have is that having guns is a right to every
American Citizen listed in the Second Amendment. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to
the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed"
("Second Amendment"). This is one of the major obstacles of those in a favor of gun control and a
key point in the argument of those against gun control. This is argued subjectively by those in favor
of gun control with saying that times have changed and guns are no longer needed in today's
society. However, as long as the Second Amendment is in place, guns will be legal.

Gun Control
Although gun control laws are made to prevent violent outcomes, the influence which laws carry are
the complete opposite to what one would think. Ever since the ratification of the Second
Amendment, the debate on gun control has become a very heated topic. There is one side that
believes that guns should be banned in order to stop any future tragedies from occurring. On the
other hand, there is another side that believes guns are our cherished right to own and we should be
allowed to use them freely. Even though many gun advocates believe that guns should be used in its
continued free fashion, there are many tragic events occurring in the US almost everyday, that
should lead to the scrutinization of guns.
The Second Amendment...show more content...
Although this event was mainly overseen, this occurrence added insult to injury as talks about gun
control revolved around this issue, but no initial laws nor decisions were made. In the past twenty
years, there has been an increase of major gun laws that have been able to prevent some tragedies
and the wrongful sale of guns.
Even though we are at a point where society has changed in the US, gun control has still been a
controversial subject that doesn't seem to have any compromise coming in its near future. Although
guns can't be directly banned, there have been many bills enacted in order to decrease the countless
occasions of gun violence, such as adding background checks and adding tougher guidelines for
purchasing a gun. In this article written by Abby Norman, she says, "It wasn't until 1993 that
background checks were instituted as a precursor to gun ownership which came as part of the Brady
Handgun Violence Prevention Act" (Norman, 2015). This law implemented a five day waiting
period for a licensed manufacturer, seller, or importer to sell, transfer, or deliver a handgun to
someone who is unlicensed. At first, this Act was successful as it was able to prevent the selling
of over 70,000 handguns, although just four years later, the law ceased to apply in November
1998. In the same, President Bill Clinton enact a newer and broader version of the Brady Act, which
was brought along with other rules as it now applied to

Gun Control For many years the controversial topic of gun control has sparked countless
passionate debates. The arguments posed in these debates vary widely concerning the possible
solutions to solving the problem of violent crime due to the possession of firearms. This paper
introduces three different views concerning gun control. The first illustrates the freedom to own
firearms. The second view advocates the complete restriction of firearms owned by citizens, and
the last one presents a modified freedom of possessing firearms. Each faction seeks to have its
position supported by national legislation. One of the big supporters of owning firearms is The
Future of Freedom Foundation, known as FFF, who wants the absolute right to own any weapon.
Their reasoning is that people in America can only protect themselves from stronger dangers if
they own firearms. They point out that weak people like women on the street can defend
themselves against an attacker, and fewer hostage situations would happen when people in
America can carry guns with them. People of FFF freely say that more guns equals less crime,
and that in some of the states where gun ownership is not highly controlled, lower crime rate is
experienced. (Benedict D. LaRosa, October, 2002) Their argument is that after the government
passed a gun control act in 1968, the crime rate climbed up in robbery cases from 138,000 in 1965
to 376,000 in 1972, while murders with guns increased from 5,015 to 10,379 in the same period
according to the Census Bureau. They cite an example about New York, where the restrictions on
guns are strong; the crime rate is higher than in Vermont, where gun controls are low. Also, they
state where gun control is strictly enforced, illegal gun ownership is much higher. By allowing
guns for citizens, the crime rate will decrease. They also considered this an economical solution for
protection. (Benedict D. LaRosa) They support multiple gun ownership for each person so they can
be safe on the street, in the office and even at home. They say gun control interferes with the right to
protect yourself and your family. They attack the government by saying that the right to own
firearms is being taken away slowly from citizens, and

In the USA, Americans have right to own guns, and this is for self– protection. However, many
people are trying to take over advantage of the law by using guns to apply physical attack on
someone. This makes the issues of regulating the access, ownership, and use of guns are paramount
importance. The question of whether guns should be controlled touches the core of the country's
national security. Many Americans think thatgun control is wrong because guns do not kill people,
people do. If a person wants to kill someone, there are millions ways for him to do his dreadful
action without guns. Also, guns do provide protections. On the other hand, many others agree that
gun control should be enforced. With the widespread all of the incidences of unpurposed mass
shootings on the media, several proponents have had to question the existing legal on gun control in
the USA. Civilians should be kept away from guns to...show more content...
While most opponents of strict gun control ague that people should be allowed to own guns because
of their own self–defense. Also, those opponents show their evidence that their right to own gun is a
part of Second Amendment. Many Americans choose to interpret this to mean that civilians could
have the right to bear arms, but the key words in the law are 'well–regulated militia', which imply
that the groups or individuals owning guns must be well regulated. Therefore, when Americans are
trained properly, guns now will be the truest meaning of self–protection. In addition, many
Americans even take advantage of the "well–regulated militia" quote to do crimes. For example,
there was a veteran who found out his wife cheated on him. While he was in anger, he used his
handgun to shoot at his wife. This implies that most of the crimes committed using civilian held guns
is not for self–defense, but rather for purposes of committing violent

Samira Rastegar
Argumentative Essay
ESOL 0054 – 81003
Dr. Dogger
Nov 15, 2017
The Gun Control
Gun control is a controversial topic that has been around for decades in the United States and all
around the world. After the recent terrible events, it has become an issue of controversy between the
two groups that agree and disagree with gun control. Between 1970 and 2000, firearm injuries in the
United States annually has 32,703 deaths. After motor–vehicle crashes, firearm injuries are second
leading reason of injury and death in the United States.Majority of people that are against with gun
control believe that gun can help them for self–defense in home and society. However, other people
believe that if we reduce the number of guns in our society, we will reduce the amount of
violence. There are many reasons for gun control. Let's focus on three main reasons: manic people,
economy issue, and accident by children. First, the crazy person is one of the reason of gun
control. Studies show, increased risk of committing to violence against other if people have serious
mental illness like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Individually if perpetrators are
using drug and alcohol, and they are not tacking medical treatment. (Cook, Goss 71). Also, review
of more than 20 studies showed that commit to violence among mentally ill people are three to five
times more than other people. (Cook, Goss 72). For example, the gunman behind the worst mass
shooting in Texas

There should be a strict gun control law in the United States to regulate gun holders and eliminate
the misuse of gun and gun violence. It is necessary for the American people to be more careful with
all the firearms due to the result of many gun death whether it's an accident or on purpose.
In the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed." Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment's intended
scope. This inalienable right should belong to our people as the power to protect themselves.
Keeping this right also shows the respect to our nation's spirit of freedom and liberty of us as...show
more content...
People in the past had to protect themselves from wild, ferocious animal and their enemies; those
were no longer a threat to us. Current society needs to modify the law to adjust current society
better and increase the applicable area of law to cover. The law is the best weapon to protect and
defend yourself, and that's why we need to improve the law with the progress of our society.
Different periods have different problems; we should make the law more flexible to applied, and
gun control is one problem we are focusing right now.
For recent years in America, word "gun violence" and "gun control" were brought up more
frequently, we reevaluate and reconsider the safety of gun and the actual use of it. Gun holder
was asked to put the gun into gun cabinets because it's easy for kids to get and find out how to use
it without any safety instruction. It's horrible to hear a kid knows how to use a gun before he
knows how to read. Kids are not the only thing we should be worried about; many adults are
incorrectly using it as well, there are more than 78 injuries and death that was caused by firearms
every single day over the

Gun control has been a controversial topic for 2 years now. Due to very recent events such as the
shooting in San Bernardino, the need for strict gun control could not be more emphasized by the
public. According to, preventioninstitute.org, eighty–nine individuals die because of shootings in the
United States every day. Easy access guns are resulting to many counts of gun violence, which is
why stricter laws need to be put into place. The current state of affairs is inadmissible and something
needs to be done immediately to prevent fewer deaths. Forming a culture of gun safety, having
accessible mental health treatment, and having sensible gun laws are all semi–solutions to the major
issue at hand.
The United States is the nation that has the

What is gun control? Who is affected by Gun Control? Why should someone care about Gun
Control? Imagine going to a concert with your friends and family, you guys are laughing and
having a good time when all of sudden someone starts shooting up the place. Are you thinking to
yourself that if guns were banned this wouldn't have never happened? Or are you wishing you
had a gun to protect everyone from what is happening? Gun Control has been an issue since the
beginning of time, there are some people who think we need it and others who say we have the
right to bear arms. With gun control a lot more lives could be saved and people won't have to be
scared of a mass shootings happening somewhere. Kids can feel safe when going to school and they
won't have to worry about one of their class mates shooting up the school.
Gun Control is a set of laws or policies that regulate the sale or use of firearms by civilians. Guns
have a high rate of killing or injuring someone, which makes this a primary topic for gun control
policies. Even with a good reason to have gun control, it is still one of the most difficult topics in
American politics. Criminals are affected by gun control because they won't be able to have easy
access to getting a gun. Families are also affected in some way, for one with gun control families
won't have to be scared of a mass shootings happening because Gun Control will be put in place.
People need to care about this because kids,women and men could have been saved from some of
these mass shootings we have had over the last couple of months. Families wouldn't have to
mourn for their loved ones, if people can just see why this is such a big issue and be able to find a
way to stop all of these killings and shootings.
Having gun control can save a lot of lives and could have stop events that shouldn't have
happened. For Example, the Las Vegas shooting and Columbine High School shooting could have
all been avoided if these shooters were not able to get easy access to all of these guns. For the Las
Vegas shooting, Stephen Paddock who killed 58 people was able to get 23firearm and hundreds of
rounds of ammunition.The police also found 19 more guns and thousands of rounds of ammunition
in his house. It's not

Gun Control In discussion of gun control, one controversial belief has been that banning certain
guns, ammo, and clips will reduce the amount of crime involving guns. On one hand, liberals
argue that this will decrease the amount of crimes because there are less guns out there. On the
other hand, conservatives contend that this is not true. Some even believe that crime might
increase due to this. My own view is that banning these items will have a negative impact on our
society, and here is why. The first reason that I don't think it would have a positive effect is
because criminals don't obey the law anyway so why would this change their availability of
firearms? Just because drugs are illegal doesn't mean one still can't obtain them, so how would
this be any different with firearms? One could buy pretty much anything their heart desires on
the black market, including human body parts, and many kinds of drugs. "Mexico has some of
the strictest gun control laws in the world and yet, in 2012, Mexico had 11,309 gun murders
(9.97 gun homicides per 100,000 people) compared to the United States that had 9,146 gun
homicides (2.97 per 100,000 people)" (should more gun control laws be enacted). With that being
said, how come some believe that we should have more strict gun laws simply because other
countries do, are we striving to be like Mexico, one might hope not. One could buy pretty much
anything their heart desires on the black market, including human body parts, and many kinds of
drugs. Making firearms illegal would not help solve anything, in fact I think it would make matters
worse. The effects of the government banning guns could lead to a crisis in America because it
would take away law abiding gun owner's protection. "The October 2015 Gallup survey showed a
higher rate of 43 percent, including guns kept on property outside the home" (Ingraham). 43 percent
of Americans are gunowners that would suffer from the government banning guns; people that could
potentially use these for self–defense in the occurrence of a robbery or assault. According to
gunowners.org: Guns used 2.5 million times a year in self–defense. Law–abiding citizens use guns
to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times

Argumentative Essay On Gun Violence
Argumentative Essay One gun, one church, and one miserable Wednesday night. On June 17th,
2015 Dylann Roof set out for a mass killing spree killing nine victims, including a pastor. Certain
rights could uphold gun laws and make it so such things do no happen; unfortunately these tragic
things do still occur. However, people who do follow the law and do follow laws help in some of
these tragic occurrences. Although these things happen it is our God given right as United States
citizens to bear arms. Through the second amendment and other gun laws, we could live in peace
and still have our rights to bear arms. The massacre that killed nine victims happened during an
evening prayer at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Church (Connor, 4). People ranged
from 26 to 81, and a pastor of 23 years were all victims of this massacre. Dylann illegally purchased
a .45–caliber Glock handgun for this crime (Connor, 2). The purchase was legal despite his...show
more content...
For example, in 2002 a law school shooting in Grundy, Virginia, came to an end when a student
confronted the shooter (Hunter, 1). Many cases have come up including gun violence; however
guns are not the problem, people are! A 2009 workplace shooting in Houston, Texas was stopped by
two workers who had their carried concealed handguns (Hunter, 1). People with carry–and–conceal
weapons have come to save the day in high schools, middle schools, malls, workplaces, and even
in churches. Another example was in 2012 in Aurora, Colorado, when during a church service a
shooting was stopped by a member of the congregation (Hunter, 2). It is so easy to point the
blame towards guns when guns can help us in many more ways than they can hurt us. This could
have been avoided if someone else had a carried conceal weapon or if Roof had been responsible
enough to get one or not have on at

Dakota Pigg
Mrs.Gallos
English 3
21 November 2017
Gun Control
A common controversial topic that is discussed universally is the issue of shootings and gun use.
Citizens views on the topic range from the wishes to completely ban guns, to the total allowance
and ownership of such items. In comparison, some drugs may be illegal, although people still
possess them. Would the same be for guns? Should more be done to implement the control over
guns? Or should more freedom be given to gun owners? One can visualize the positives and
negatives regarding gun control by learning more about the following: the suspected terrorist list,
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is constantly adding new names to a list of suspected
terrorist....show more content...
These trends and patterns are indicative of the use of black market practices to obtain various
weapons by groups that the FBI and other law enforcement have been attempting to limit access to
weapons. Well known terrorist, Farook, who was involved in the San Bernardino terrorist attack
demonstrated the use of acquiring weapons through the black market as he went through friends and
neighbors to gather weapons he would not be able to get himself.
Some studies show, like the one coordinated by Cato, bans on certain guns in five states did not lead
to a decline in gun crime when compared to the other forty–five states, but an increase.
This counter argument is supported by evidence from VPC where they organized a study called
Firearm Justifiable Homicides and Non–Fatal Self Defense Gun Use, "In 2012, for every justifiable
homicide in the United States involving a firearm, guns were used in 32 criminal homicides."
(Whittenburg). During 2012 there were 8,342 homicides total. Given these points, guns were
scarcely used for self–defense and in turn used in criminal homicides.
Bailey, David. "Does Gun Control Encourage Crime? The Science of Crime Statistics."
huffingtonpost.com. Oath Inc, 3 Aug. 2016. Web. 15 Nov. 2017.
Cook, Philip. "How dangerous people get

Gun Control Argumentative Essay
Over the last few years, homicides due to firearms have seen a large increase in commonality and
the debate over gun ownership is as impassioned as ever before. On one hand, avid gun owners cite
the 2nd Amendment and their constitutional right to bear arms as reason to maintain possession over
their firearms. On the other hand though, many fanatics believe that guns should not be accessible to
any member of society, exempt of course for only members of the law enforcement or their country's
military. However, weighing all the possible options and providing resources for strictergun control
laws could help save the lives of many countless victims. Currently, there are over 33,000 gun
related deaths per year, coupled with over 370 mass shootings...show more content...
Currently, each store must conduct a background check that consists of asking of prior convictions
and commitments to mental institutions from the potential buyer. If in the case that the buyer is
deemed fit for purchase, they can likely walk out of the store with a gun, including a high–powered
automatic rifle, the same day. However, if their application is flagged a more extensive
background check is conducted, rightfully so. Nonetheless, rejections only occur in less than 1%
of gun applications and more often than not uninformed and untrained citizens become gun
owners if they apply (LePore 4). Even members of the "No Fly List," a list for potential domestic
terrorists, who aren't allowed to board American flights, are often allowed to obtain a gun license
without much thorough investigation to their background as long as they haven't been labeled
mentally disabled. Such is the case with the Orlando's gay nightclub shooter last year, Omar
Mateen. Mateen, was a suspected terrorist, who although was on the "No Fly List," was still
allowed to obtain a highly powered automatic weapon just days before his unprovoked massacre. By
applying a more thorough required background process, gun stores face much less risk of selling to a
potentially unstable person with ulterior motives than

Indeed, the United States has a long tradition of holding guns. The public opinion with guns is
deeply based. A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2017 showed that 48% of the
population grew up in armed families; 72% believed that most people should have the right to
have guns or that almost everyone had the right to hold guns; 61% believed that the people have
the right to hold almost all types of firearms or most types of firearms; 56% believe that gunners
should be allowed to hold guns in almost any location or in most places. The right to hold guns is
both a constitutional provision and a "political correctness," and gun control faces many practical
resistances. However, with the continuous occurrence of vicious shooting incidents,...show more
content...
On the issue of gun legislation, the Democratic Party tends to establish a strict gun control law and
tries to pass it through the National Assembly. The Republican Party, on the other hand, strives to
prevent the passage of laws and regulations from the standpoint of fighting for party interests such as
voters and election expenses. Therefore, the bill proposed by the Democrats is difficult to pass in the
Senate, where the Republicans dominate. Since most of the constituency divisions in the House of
Representatives are decided by Republican–controlled state legislatures, the Republicans have more
"stable" seats than Democrats do. In the constituencies of these members of the House of
Representatives, politicians are more sensitive to their voters, and these voters are also more
inclined to vote on popular issues such as gun rights. The penalty for offending these voters is much
higher than alienating voters who support gun control, because voters who support gun control often
do not participate in the Republican primary election. The demographic structure also played a role
in the support of the House of Representatives in support of guns, because the proportion of gun
owners is higher in urban areas than in urban areas. Even

Gun Control Argument Essay
"A New Beginning" Gun control has been a major debate ever since considerably the greatest
shooting, the columbine has occurred. There has been gun activists and gun protests to argue
whether guns should be ban. The government has remained inactive and idle on the issue, refusing
to enforce stricter gun control on behalf of Second Amendment rights. Banning guns could be the
next step to opening the doors in our fearful society. The usage of guns is unnecessary and unneeded
in order to live in a peaceful country.
The most important reason guns should be taken away is clearly safety. According to BBC News,
"Some 13,286 people were killed in the US by firearms in 2015, according to the Gun Violence
Archive, and 26,819 people were injured [those...show more content...
Indeed, it will involve removing the second amendment which will anger many people, however,
times are changing. For instance, if America turned into a hateful country, in other words, society
would hate those who follow certain religion, hate on other ethnics, and discriminating people based
on their skin color. All of this is possible just because of the first amendment. Wouldn't it be the
right choice to remove the first amendment to reconcile otherwise America would be doomed. If we
don't take away guns, the death count in America will keep rising up and the cycle would repeat
itself. Are guns itself more precious than the lives of other human

Gun control in the United States is a very controversial topic in today's political society, leaving the
nation divided into two sides with two strongly opinionated beliefs. This all started with the increase
in the amount of mass shootings and an overall increase in gun violence. The two sides consist of
the liberal point of view and the conservative point of view. The liberals believe that the availability
of firearms to the people in the country is a major issue, and that the U.S. government is at fault for
the mass shootings due to the lenient regulations on guns. In retaliation, the conservatives argue that
having a gun is a God given right, that the Second Amendment of The Constitution. Although the
availability of guns is seen to be...show more content...
has a sin tax on harmful substances such as cigarettes and alcohol, so why are there none on gun
regulation? Putting a tax on the price of guns could potentially decrease the overall percentage of
purchase of guns. In the U.S. simple regulated background checks are required by licensed firearm
dealers, yet there is no mandatory check when exchanging a weapon privately, while in other
countries such as Canada background checks are mandatory across all firearm exchanges and focus
on the buyer's mental health and addiction history. The United States could learn how to keep citizens
safer by examining other areas' regulations. "California has America's strictest gun laws. This means
that prospective gun owners must hold a Firearms Safety Certificate, submit to a waiting period like
in Canada, buy weapons only through licensed dealers, and possess only a 'California legal' gun that
complies with restrictions on what can and cannot be sold inside the state." (https:/
/www.nationalobserver.com/2015/12/04/news
/how–american–gun–deaths–and–gun–laws–compare–canadas). Compared to Canada's gun laws
these are seen as fairly lenient. According to the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics,
California is on the lower end of the spectrum when it comes to gun violence per capita, evidence
shows that (as of 2014) California's death rate is 7.4 per 100,000 people, compared to a much
smaller state with lenient gun

Gun Control Argumentative Essay
Gun control
In the U.S. more than 30,000 people are killed by firearms each year, you can say that we need
stricter gun laws. Who should we blame for all of the shootings in America? We should blame the
people who pull the trigger, the people who sell the guns, and our government. Gun control is one of
the biggest debates because everyone has their own strong opinions. If the U.S. had better gun
control laws, then there wouldn't be any gun violence issues. The government can't figure out what
to do about the gun violence debate. Twice in the last two years the gun problem has reached the
nation's highest court. The main reason is the 2nd amendment. People simply won't give away their
firearms because they have the right to bear arms and that...show more content...
These are innocent children and teachers that are being killed by lunatics carrying a gun. Adam
Lanza was the shooter in the Sandy Hook shooting that killed twelve students, six school employees,
and his mother. Adam had many untreated disorders such as anxiety, excessive–compulsive disorder,
anorexia, and aspergers. This proves that if we had stronger background checks this may never have
happened. The gun sellers simply don't care about who is buying their guns, all they care about is
making money. Adam was also using an AR–15 which is an assault weapon that should be outlawed
for civilians. James Holmes was responsible for the mass movie theater shooting in Aurora,
Colorado. This shooting killed 12 people and injured 70 others. Experts say the reason why James
shot up the movie theater was because he had an untreated schizophrenia disorder. In these two
incidences the killers were able to get guns, even though they were mentally ill. They were guilty of
the crimes, but sometimes our Judicial System will find them innocent for reasons of insanity and
may eventually be let back into society. The senseless shootings might all be prevented with more
thorough background

Sami Walsh
English 1100 *78
Professor Davis
29 November 2017
Essay 3
The definition of gun control is "the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale,
transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians." With the horrific events that
have occurred lately in our country, I believe that the laws on gun control are not strict enough.
There are only a handful of people who cannot possess a gun, leaving millions of other individuals
with the ability to own a firearm. Almost anyone can buy a gun, but not just "anyone" should be
allowed to have one.
A gun is a very dangerous weapon that needs to be taken care of by a responsible person. The
person behind the trigger must know exactly how to hold, use, and shoot a firearm. Many people
have been killed or severely injured when encountering one of these deadly weapons. Gun control is
no joke, our politicians need to unite and help our country become a safer, gun reduced place. We as
a nation are tired of waking up and casually hearing about another mass shooting that could have
been prevented.
According to Every Town Research, "On an average day 93 Americans are killed with guns." Also,
"America's gun homicide rate is more than 25 times the average of other developed countries" If gun
laws were stricter, these statistics would instantly decrease. Obviously, our country has a problem if
our homicidal gun rate is that much higher than every other country. We need to consider other
countries gun laws to see what they are doing, maybe that would help us decrease the death rate
across America.
America just suffered a huge loss in the Las Vegas shooting. 58 people dead and 500 injured. It is
ridiculous how one man could take so many lives and then take his own life. Reported by CNN,
"No one knows why Paddock morphed from a retired accountant to the deadliest mass shooter in
modern US history." If he did not have access to the military style rifles that he owned, maybe none
of this would have happened.
Paddock was reported to be possessing 42 guns and an excessive amount of ammunition. How in the
world was this man not questioned when he was buying a surplus amount of ammunition, along with
those insanely powerful machines? No single person

Gun control, one of the most sensitive issues in America today; should we the people believe in
gun control or should we discard it as futile. The American constitution states in the second
amendment " A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of
the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed", and so why should there be a need to put
regulations on gun ownership. On the other hand gun control helps regulate on persons who can
own a gun such as the mentally ill and convicted felons who can cause more harm to others and
themselves. Gun control will also help decrease school shootings and other mayhem that occurs in
the United states. If gun control helps regulate on gun violence why is it so controversial?
Gun control weather it violates the constitution or not has some benefits to it, for some of these
benefits help on choosing who can own a firearm. Convicted felons who are released from prison
cannot own a firearm for in the states judgment they will commit another crime. The mentally ill
cannot own a firearm for in fear of them hurting themselves or others. Gun control also regulates
what type of...show more content...
The American people argue it is unconstitutional because it is our right to bear arms and cannot be
infringe and slowly disarming the public. Firearms are needed for home defense and the
protection of loved ones against criminals who break into the home. People who live on the
outskirts of civilization need firearms for hunting as a means of providing food for their family,
and with out their firearms they may never be able to provide for their family. Sentimental firearms
are passed down through generations and hold the position of valued heirlooms, for no person will
give up their family's

Argument Essay On Gun Control

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Service College

Recently uploaded

Argument Essay On Gun Control